EURONAV TALKS IMO 2020 FROM THE VIEW OF A SHIPOWNER JUNE

Similar documents
AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION SULPHUR REGULATIONS

The Changing composition of bunker fuels: Implications for refiners, traders, and shipping

Implications Across the Supply Chain. Prepared for Sustainableshipping Conference San Francisco 30 September 2009

IMO 2020: A Sea Change is Coming

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to A key to understanding the future of marine bunkers and fuel oil markets

IMO 2020 Dilemmas, Choices & Economics for the ship owners

IMPACTS OF THE IMO SULPHUR REGULATIONS ON THE CANADIAN CRUDE OIL MARKET

Bunkers - pricing outlook

Changes on the Horizon

Clean Marine one fuel, all sources, all 1me! Tuzla Jan Fredrik Gulbrandsen

Trends for Refining Residual Fuel Oil. Prepared for Bunker Asia Forum 2011 Singapore 7 September 2011

Changes in Bunker Fuel Quality Impact on European and Russian Refiners

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to 2025 Sourcing Lower Sulphur Products

VTTI placing Cyprus on the Oil Trading Map 19 June 2018

VTTI. Storage Markets : Our Perspective. StocExpo Europe March Onur Capan: Market Intelligence

Bracing up for A refiner s response to breaking the status quo

Marine Insurance day 2018

IMO 2020 & Marine Fuels An Oil Major s Viewpoint

Residual Fuel Market Issues

Market Report Series: Oil 2018 Analysis & Forecasts to Energy Community 10 th Oil Forum, Belgrade, 25 September 2018

The road leading to the 0.50% sulphur limit and IMO s role moving forward

Marine Bunkers 2020 & Beyond

Bunker Fuel Quality: 2020 Outlook North of England P&I Athens, November

The Effects of Changes to Marine Fuel Sulfur Limits in 2020 on Energy Markets March 2019

NORDEA SHIPPING CONFERENCE INVESTOR PRESENTATION

Desulphurizing Bunker Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology

Update on Environment Issues Asian Regional Panel Meeting

Squaring up IMO 2020 Global Sulphur Cap Maintaining a Fleet at Optimal Efficiency

Outlook for Marine Fuels Demand & Regulation: Implications for Refining and Are We Getting Global Oil Demand Forecasting Wrong?

Removing High Sulphur Bunker from the Refineries: Eni s case study

IEA Bioenergy ExCo78 workshop Biofuel supply to Interislander

September Vistin Trading An Energy World of Opportunities

Royal Belgian Institute of Marine Engineers

Bunker Fuels Focus: IMO2020 Update #4

The Transition to Low Sulfur Bunker Fuel

ECA changes and its impact on distillate demand

Marine Fuel Management. Mark Pearson ASGL Marine Fuel Manager Athens, 9 April 2014

Market Report Series Oil 2018 Analysis and Forecasts to Columbia University Centre on Global Energy Policy, New York, May 22 nd 2018

Regulations : Compliance Challenges and Impact on Dry Bulk Overcapacity

MARITIME GLOBAL SULPHUR CAP. Know the different choices and challenges for on-time compliance SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

2020? Lars Robert Pedersen. Deputy Secretary General. EGCSA Conference London 22 May 2017

A multi-fuel future: the impact of the IMO sulphur cap

Residual Fuel Market Outlook

LNG. DME Ethane. Coal Slurry MSAR. Biofuel ULSFO (Ultra Low Sulphur Fuel Oil) Methanol Glycerine Hydrogen

Availability of Low Sulphur Marine Fuels: Prospects & Issues

New York Energy Forum IMO2020 Market Issues

AL BADI TRADING OIL & GAS PRODUCTS LLC

Desulphurizing Marine Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology. November 19, 2017 International Ultrasonic Technologies Inc.

Examining the cost burden imposed on European refining by EU legislation

Performing In A Volatile Oil Market

Company Overview. Fleet Profile. Key Facts

What Do the Impending New Bunker Specs Mean for Refiners

AN INTEGRATED GROUP. A single point of contact for a full spectrum of solutions

2020 Sulphur Cap. Challenges and Opportunities. Delivering Maritime Solutions.

LNG as an alternative fuel for the Italian market Alessandro Gaeta SVP Primary Logistics eni r&mc. Rome, 11 June 2015

Your proven route to competitive SOx compliance

USE OF MDO BY SHIPS PART OF A HOLISTIC APPROACH

Future Marine Fuel Quality Changes: How might terminals prepare?

Workshop on GHG Emission On Ships Co-organised by CIL and MPA

RESULTS FOR Q ANALYST TELECONFERENCE

Marine Division. Peter Leifland Alfa Laval Group

Compliance with IMO Regulations - New Strategies for Refiners in the U.S. and Internationally

Ship Energy Efficiency and Air Pollution. Ernestos Tzannatos Department of Maritime Studies University of Piraeus

Low sulphur bunker fuel oil : what are the options?

MARINE FUELS MARPOL ANNEX VI 2020

Global Sulfur Cap

DRY BULK FREIGHT MARKET OUTLOOK MJUNCTION INDIAN STEEL MARKETS CONFERENCE

The Continuing Journey to 2020 and the 0.5% Sulphur Limit For Marine Fuel

Focus on Slurry Hydrocracking Uniflex Process Upgrade Bottom-of-the-Barrel to Improve Margins

Shell Alexia S4. Proven performance under tough conditions. Shell Marine Products

Residue Upgrading Technologies Key Technologies, Considerations & Options for your Refinery Russia BBTC 2015 MOSCOW

IMO 2020: Implications for Crude Oil Prices. Philip K. Verleger. PKVerleger LLC and Colorado School of Mines July 2018

Products Methodology. September 2013

INDUSTRY'S PERSPECTIVE ON THE COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOW SULPHUR REQUIREMENTS. Pulp and paper industries' views and assessment

2018 World Maritime Day Observance. November 14th, 2018 Cozumel, Quintana Roo, Mexico

Converting Visbreakers to Delayed Cokers - An Opportunity for European Refiners

Regional Energy Trade and Refining Industry in Northeast Asia

Low Sulphur Marine Fuel: Supply and refining challenges

LNG fuel as an alternative to low-sulphur marine gas oil for complying with the new emission rules. September 29 th, 2017 Limassol

Middle East DownStream Weak May 2013 ABU DHABI, UAE

New 2020 sulphur regulations for global shipping

Shipping and Environmental Challenges MARINTEK 1

Dr Diamantis Andriotis, Technical Manager, Stealth Maritime Corporation SA

Acombination. winning

The IMO 2020: Global Shipping s Blue Sky Moment

Product Tanker Market Outlook IMSF Geneva - May 2017

Newbuildings & Yards 20 June Marine Money Week New York Prepared by Angelica Kemene Head of Market Analysis & Intelligence

Market Report Series Oil 2018

EEDI. SOx PM2.5. The importance of enforcement. Partnerskab for grøn Skibsfart

Downstream Petroleum Sector The Growing Prominence of Asian Refining

Crude to Chemicals. Opportunities and Challenges of an Industry Game-Changer. MERTC, Bahrain. January 23, 2017

Technical Session: Crude Oil Supply High Quality Competitive Distillate Fuels from Coal-to-Liquids Processing

A pathway for the evolution of the refining industry and liquid fuels in Europe

ARA TT Market Projections

Pacific Fuel Price Monitor

Rotor Sail Solution. Tuomas Riski - Norsepower Steen Jacobsen - Maersk Tankers Energy Technologies Institute LLP - Subject to notes on page 1

Worldwide Demand for Crude Oil & Refined Products: Refinery Business Objectives: Fundamental Qualities of Oil:

How The IMO is Not Making Shipping Great Again

Dealing with the 2020 sulphur cap

Trinidad and Tobago Energy

Transcription:

EURONAV TALKS IMO 2020 FROM THE VIEW OF A SHIPOWNER JUNE 2018 1

IMO 2020 2

% weight permitted WHAT IS IMO 2020 I HAVE SEEN ONE BEFORE.BUT NEVER THIS BIG Hill 4.5% Cliff 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% Open Seas 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% Emission Control Areas (ECA) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Source: IMO Year 3

WHY SHIPPING MATTERS 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% HOUSTON (Rotterdam, Singapore, Fujairah) WE HAVE A PROBLEM 10% 5% 0% Global Shipping as % of Oil Demand Global Shipping as % of all oil based sulphur emissions Source: IMO 4

REFINERY IMO 2020: LIMITED IMPACT ON REFINERS Product Use 2018 Demand mbpd Current Prices $bbl LPG Commercial fuel 12 38 BRENT Naphtha Petrochemical 6 91 Gasoline Automotive fuel 26 97 Jet Fuel Aviation fuel 7 93 Kerosene Commercial heating 0.5 101 Diesel Automotive fuel 29 94 Residual Fuel Oil Ship bunker fuel 7 59 Asphalt Highway/Roof 2 55 Source: Bernstein, Citi 5

Value in use $/bbl Industrial RESIDUAL FUEL DEMAND TODAY 70 SUPPLY 60 50 40 30 Bunkers Utility Fuel for gas & coal 20 PRICE Refinery Feedstock 10 Mbpd 2 4 6 8 10 12 6

Value in use $/bbl Industrial RESIDUAL FUEL DEMAND POST 2020 70 SUPPLY 60 50 40 30 Bunkers Utility \ Fuel for gas & coal 20 PRICE Refinery Feedstock 10 Mbpd 2 4 6 8 10 12 7

WHO IS DOING WHAT? Showcasing 2 possible new 0.5% fuels at industry events Will supply new fuels in NW Euro, Mediterranean & Singapore Believes 0.5% sulphur oil will be $120-190/mt more expensive than LSFO Deciding whether to produce 0.5% LSFO for export outside European ECA MIXED MESSAGES Plans to sell 30-40,000 mt/month of single 0.5% sulphur fuels Built $1bn facility to provide advanced cracking; licensed to 2 plants in China 8

HIGH SULPHUR FUEL OIL DISPLACEMENT REFINERS CAN CLOSE MUCH OF THE GAP 0.1 0.3 0.4 1.0 1.0 1.2 LNG Scrubbers Non Compliance Blending MGO ULSFO Source: Euronav M bpd 9

SCRUBBERS ARE NOT FOR EVERYBODY, LITERALLY THEY ARE NOT A SCALE SOLUTION 120 Penetration of scrubbers in core shipping segments 100 1% As of September 2017 80 under 1.0% 60 13% 40 20 0 Ferries Cruise Ship Bulk Carrier Chemical/Oil Tanker Container LPG/Gas Carrier Other Source: Clarksons, Citi 10

HOW WILL THE REST OF THE WORLD SEE SULPHUR IN THE OCEAN? 11

THE BIG SHORT PLAY Buying a LONG futures positon in a falling market, what is the safe price? 1 VLCC consumes 75mt per day x 330 sailing days = 24,000 mt per year = NATURAL SHORT HSFO market 2000 mt per month in Calendar 2020 = BUY HSFO knowing it hedges physical position, then can trade the volatility = What is the Price? = Current market at TC market low BP recently fixed market rate +3k for scrubber So option price = $3k x 365 = $1,080,000 for a forward market volatile between todays HSFO price of $400 p/t and absolute destruction value of $100 p/t or less 12

COMPLIANCE, ENFORCEMENT & REGULATION WELL ESTABLISHED FOR TANKER MARKET Wide variance in penalty regimes but remember oily water separators Reputation & Customer structure in large tanker sector underpins high compliance 13

SHIP OWNER OPTIONS IMO 2020 options Ultra Low Sulphur Fuel Oil - ULSFO Install scrubbers Marine Gasoil LNG High expense, No risk Low expense, High risk High expense, No risk High expense, No risk 14

Payback Period, years SCRUBBER ECONOMICS 5.0 Scrubber Payback Period 4.5 4.0 4.30 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 3.39 2.79 2.69 2.14 1.78 1.53 1.24 1.03 1.26 1.07 1.02 0.93 0.87 0.76 0.74 0.86 0.73 0.60 0.61 0.64 0.50 0.51 0.42 100 150 250 300 350 400 500 600 Source: Euronav I Class VLCC Fuel Spread in usd/ton 300 days at sea 250 days at sea 200 days at sea 15

Payback Period, years SCRUBBER ECONOMICS 5.0 Scrubber Payback Period 4.5 4.0 4.30 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 3.39 2.79 2.69 2.14 1.78 1.53 1.24 1.03 1.26 1.07 1.02 0.93 0.87 0.76 0.74 0.86 0.73 0.60 0.61 0.64 0.50 0.51 0.42 100 150 250 300 350 400 500 600 Source: Euronav I Class VLCC Fuel Spread in usd/ton 300 days at sea 250 days at sea 200 days at sea 16

SCRUBBERS FOCUS IS ON WRONG AREA 17

SCRUBBERS FOCUS IS ON WRONG AREA 18

SCRUBBER ISSUES UNCERTAIN HOW LONG FUEL SPREAD WILL MAKE SCRUBBERS VIABLE CAPITAL COST & COMMISSIONING INSTALLATION OPERATION VESSEL EFFICIENCY FUEL SOURCING FUTURE REGULATION Fixed cost of $4-5m for VLCC Lost revenue in commissioning & installation Capacity to build units Difficulty of installation Space required on vessel varies according to differing designs Training costs and investment for staff Significant risk of corrosion key areas Risk of engine failure/will the scrubber work? Insurance/Liability Maintenance costs VLCC will lose 1% efficiency Extra weight from scrubber Cannot use scrubber in Port or approaches or in Ecozones Energy Load Back Pressure Uncertainty over capability to source sufficient HFO post 2020 Utilisation Potential for change in regulations post 2020 Vessel changes will increase carbon emissions 19

LNG COSTLY AND IMPRACTICAL SOLUTION; IT S AS SAFE AS IT IS COLD o Prohibitive cost to retrofit LNG to crude tanker c. $10m o Insulation risk for LNG facility o Limited current LNG capacity/infrastructure o Issue of space on a crude tanker with added LNG fittings 20

WIDER IMPLICATIONS FOR TANKER SECTOR OF IMO 2020 21

#1 NEW TRADING ROUTES 22

Source: Wells Fargo, IMO, UNCTAD, Company Filings # 2 STORAGE OPPORTUNITIES HSFO Volumes Bear Case Bull Case MARKET SIZE IMO 2020 HSFO Conversion Volumes 3.3 3.3 MITIGATING FACTORS Estimated Non Compliance/Scrubber Penetration -1.0-0.5 HSFO Volumes to be replaced 2.3 2.8 HSFO REPLACEMENT Higher coking capacity, higher light sweet crude runs etc -2.2-2.0 Remaining non compliant volumes 0.1 0.8 Mid Point 0.5 STORAGE Estimated Global HSFO storage 94.0 AVAILABILITY Current HSFO Inventory 64.0 Remaining Land based HSFO Storage 30.0 Time it would take to fill land based storage post March 2020 62 days VLCCs Absorbed per Quarter until market clears 23 23

# 3 MORE CRUDE RUNS REQUIRED = MORE SHIPPING 0.7m BPD CRUDE REQUIRED (PLATTS) TO PRODUCE ULTRA LOW SULPHUR FUEL OIL 24

Number of VLCCs # 4 ACCELERATING RECYCLING 35 30 25 20 15 Number of VLCCs over 17 years old 93 Tankers > 17 o Incoming regulatory costs (Ballast Water 2019 & IMO 2020) o Reduced earnings/utilisation with age o High value of recycle prices 10 o Higher fuel costs 5 0 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 VLCC Age @ June 2018 Source: Fearnley PRESSURE ON OWNERS OLDER TONNAGE 25

Average fuel consumption (Mt/day) # 5 SLOW STEAMING TO PRESERVE NEW FUEL 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 Ballast Speed (kts) Source: CR Weber, Morgan Stanley 26

WHAT IMO 2020 COULD MEAN FOR TANKERS #1 INCREASED FUEL COSTS = NEW TRADING ROUTES #2 INCREASED FUEL COSTS = STORAGE OPPORTUNITIES #3 INCREASED FUEL COSTS = MORE OIL PRODUCED = MORE SHIPPING #4 INCREASED FUEL COST = MORE RECYCLING #5 INCREASED FUEL COSTS = SLOW STEAMING 27