Outline. Terms To Be Familiar With (cont d) Terms To Be Familiar With. Deflectometer Equipment. Why are these two terms critical?

Similar documents
Introduction to Seminar: Technical Content. Terms To Be Familiar With. Outline. 5. Garbage in, garbage out (6)

Falling Weight Deflectometer

Assessing Pavement Rolling Resistance by FWD Time History Evaluation

Status of the first experiment at the PaveLab

Non-contact Deflection Measurement at High Speed

Concrete Airport Pavement Workshop Right Choice, Right Now ACPA SE Chapter Hilton Atlanta Airport November 8, 2012

PRESENTED FOR THE 2002 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AIRPORT TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER CONFERENCE 05/02

Accelerated Pavement Tester

FAA FRANGIBILITY RESEARCH

Evaluation of the Rolling Wheel Deflectometer (RWD) in Louisiana. John Ashley Horne Dr. Mostafa A Elseifi

Structural Considerations in Moving Mega Loads on Idaho Highways

Non-Destructive Pavement Testing at IDOT. LaDonna R. Rowden, P.E. Pavement Technology Engineer

Field Verification of Smoothness Requirements for Weigh-In-Motion Approaches

PN 420-7/18/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

Round robin tests in the Netherlands

Darwin-ME Status and Implementation Efforts_IAC09

PAVEMENT TESTING, ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND REVIEW REPORT Cold In-Place Recycling Project Brown County State Aid Highway 3, Minnesota

DIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS

SECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

CHECK AND CALIBRATION PROCEDURES FOR FATIGUE TEST BENCHES OF WHEEL

Characterization of LTPP Pavements using Falling Weight Deflectometer

The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application

RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CONSIDERATIONS. SWIFT 2013 Chris Olidis, P.Eng.

Young Researchers Seminar 2009

Runway Surface Condition Assessment and Reporting. History Behind FAA Friction Level Classifications. Federal Aviation Administration

MOVING PAVEMENT DEFLECTION TESTING MEASUREMENTS

Rutting of Caltrans Asphalt Concrete and Asphalt-Rubber Hot Mix. Under Different Wheels, Tires and Temperatures Accelerated

TAM International, Inc. QI Visible Magnetic Particle Inspection

FRA High Speed Adjustable Perturbation Slab Track

Correlation of the Road Rater and the Dynatest Falling Weight Deflectorneter. Final Report for MLR-91-4

Pavement Thickness Design Parameter Impacts

PN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

mga research corporation

Runway Grooving and Skid Resistance

- New Superpave Performance Graded Specification. Asphalt Cements

Skukuza Airport Airfield side Flexible Pavements: PCN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Implementation and Thickness Optimization of Perpetual Pavements in Ohio

AC 150/5320-6E and FAARFIELD

Use of New High Performance Thin Overlays (HPTO)

Profiler Certification Process at the Virginia Smart Road

CEE 320 Midterm Examination (50 minutes)

DYNAMIC PILE TESTING 10/26/ General.

Industry/PennDOT Initiative On Performance Testing. AN UPDATE January 22, 2019

7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads. 7.4 Landing Gear Loading on Pavement

Using the WaferSense Auto Gapping Sensor (AGS) On Novellus Vector

Appendix A. Summary and Evaluation. Rubblized Pavement Test Results. at the. Federal Aviation Administration National Airport Test Facility

FMVSS 121 Brake Performance and Stability Testing

Mattest (Ireland) Ltd

CERTIFIER MODEL 912 CERTIFIER 912 Brake Timing Test

Evaluation of Accuracy and Precision of Highway Speed Deflection Devices

7.0 PAVEMENT DATA. 7.1 General Information. 7.2 Landing Gear Footprint. 7.3 Maximum Pavement Loads

Median Barriers in North Carolina

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware

February 8, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/CC-104

Warm Mix Technology. Sasobit. Sasobit. Available WMA Technologies SEAUPG 2005 CONFERENCE - NASHVILLE, TN CONCERNS: Frankfurt Airport

Equivalent Loading Frequencies to Simulate Asphalt Layer Pavement Responses Under Dynamic Traffic Loading

Passive Vibration Reduction with Silicone Springs and Dynamic Absorber

Installation Manual. Talon Series. Portable Vehicle Scale by Fairbanks Scales, Inc. All rights reserved.

MASH 2016 Implementation: What, When and Why

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier

LOW-PROFILE SIDERAIL TRUCK SCALES S E R I E S. Toughest Truck Scales On Earth.

SKID RESISTANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM

Understanding Fuel: Costs, Purchasing, Pricing Strategy, & Internationally

METODS OF MEASURING DISTRESS

Advanced Design of Flexible Aircraft Pavements

Ground Penetrating Radar Survey of a Cemetery: Interpretation

The effect of grinding and grooving on the noise generation of Portland Cement Concrete pavement

Profiler Certification Program at the NCAT Pavement Test Track. R. Buzz Powell Jason Nelson

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (IRI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

V PicoScope NVH Diagnostics Overview

Novel Chassis Concept for Omnidirectional Driving Maneuvers

Evaluation of Grind and Groove (Next Generation Concrete Surface) Pilot Projects in California

Crash Testing Growth Common Roadside Hardware Systems Draft FHWA and AASHTO Requirements for Implementing MASH 2015

Effect of Load, Tire Pressure, and Tire Type on Flexible Pavement Response

FAQ s Categories. Frequently Asked Questions related to Safety Edge Technology grouped in 5 categories:

Table Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

SECTIO N 610 PAVEMENT SMO O THNESS

Variation of Deflection with Measuring Equipment and Load Speed on Test Track

Morehouse Instrument Company

TxDOT Project : Statewide Implementation of Total Pavement Acceptance Device (TPAD)

The European Standards for Asphalt

TOWARDS THE APPLICATION OF STRESS-IN-MOTION (SIM) RESULTS IN PAVEMENT DESIGN AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

REHABILITATION DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR HAUL ROADS ASSOCIATED WITH A WIND FARM DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier

Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation

DESCRIPTION This work consists of measuring the smoothness of the final concrete or bituminous surface.

Impact of Environment-Friendly Tires on Pavement Damage

Tex-614-J, Testing Epoxy Materials

IVTM Installation Manual

ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS FOR ROAD SURFACE CPX MEASUREMENTS

LCN ACN-PCN

Airfield Frangibility Criteria Questions and Concerns with Current Standards

July 10, Refer to: HSA-10/CC-78A

Boston Scientific Energy Storage Project. Final Report (PUBLIC) November 2016

The Use of Falling-Weight Deflectometers in Determining Critical Velocity Problems. Craig Govan, URS, Trackbed Technology

Gain an understanding of how the vehicles work. Determine the advantages and disadvantages of each

Fast Track Repair Materials and Methods. 9/22/2006 International Grooving &Grinding Association 1

July 17, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176A

Checklist Series. 6 Joint Sealing. Portland Cement Concrete Pavements

Transcription:

Calibration and Specifications for the Falling Weight Deflectometer and Heavy Weight Deflectometer Outline Prepared for the ALACPA Conference October 2009 Sao Paulo, Brazil By Frank B. Holt Sr. Vice President Dynatest International A/S Terminology Equipment Standards Other references With kind assistance from Dr. Gonzalo Rada Fugro USA Terms To Be Familiar With Terms To Be Familiar With (cont d) reference calibration term used to describe the calibration of either the FWD load cell or deflection sensors against a separate reference measuring system. For load cell calibration, the reference system is a custom-made reference load cell; and for deflection sensors, it is a precision accelerometer. Done at the factory and / or at a Calibration Center relative calibration term used to describe a calibration procedure in which the deflection sensors are calibrated relative to one another. No outside reference system is used; the sensors are compared to each other. It is a quick means to periodically verify that the sensors are functioning properly and consistently Why are these two terms critical? Deflectometer Equipment Relative calibration is done at least monthly. Reference calibration is done annually at a calibration center, or by a certified technician on location. If these are not done how do you know if the data is good? Inaccurate data will lead to inaccurate results and designs 1

Some Different Deflectometers Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD) While only used on unbound materials these devices also require calibration annually. Deflection Measurement The load cell and sensors are the critical component to collect accurate data What is an HWD / FWD? Comprised of a tow vehicle and trailer Designed to impart a dynamic load to a pavement structure Measures deflection of the pavement surface Simulates a moving wheel load. What is it Used For? Structural capacity/remaining life estimates Load transfer efficiency between PCC pavement joints Void detection in PCC pavements Network level pavement management Project level pavement investigations Many research applications. Standards 2

HWD/FWD Calibration Think of FWD deflections as shots at a target Important Standards Owners Manual for your FWD/HWD Provides the manufacturer s recommendation on maintenance and calibration ASTM D4694 - Standard Test Method for Deflections with a Falling-Weight-Type Impulse Load Device Uncalibrated SensorsAfter Reference Calibration After Relative Calibration May or may not fall within Randomly 2% scattered closer to target Very close to May or may not be biased intended target ASTM D4695 - Standard Guide for General Pavement Deflection Measurements Important Standards FAA AC 150/5370-11A - USE OF NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING IN THE EVALUATION OF AIRPORT PAVEMENTS Section 11 states: the NDT equipment sensors should provide accurate and repeatable deflection measurements at each sensor location. FAA AC 150/5370-11A - USE OF NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING IN THE EVALUATION OF AIRPORT PAVEMENTS This AC also provides excellent guidance to users for testing procedures on both Asphalt and Portland cement Concrete pavements AASHTO R32-09 Standard requirements The Standard Recommended Practice for Calibrating the Load Cell and Deflection Sensors for a Falling Weight Deflectometer The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) developed R32 in January of 2009 The equipment is highly specialized and will be available for a source to be determined The site and operators will be trained and certified prior to any calibration being performed. 3

R32 Overview Calibration Equipment Defines terminology Defines the Method Defines the Apparatus to be used Defines the setup of the FWD/HWD for the calibration Defines the setup of the Reference Load cell and the deflection sensors Defines the annual and monthly procedures Defines the Report that should be provided after calibration Defines the Precision and Bias of the procedure Apparatus Test Pad The calibration facility is defined as indoor space with controlled temperature and a level floor large enough for vehicle and trailer The test pad may either be constructed or an existing slab which meets defined criteria for size and deflections Portland Cement Concrete Typically 4 by 5 meters and crack free although an existing slab may have hairline cracks no wider than 1.5 mm Slab should be isolated from the surrounding floor so transient vibrations are not transmitted into the pad Slab deflection of 300 microns with a 70 kn load Minimum slab thickness of 125 mm on 200 mm open graded crushed materials Subgrade modulus less than 80 MPa Bedrock deeper than 7 to 9 meters FWD/HWD setup Calibrating a built in FWD FWD/HWD shall be properly maintained and working Shall be attached to the tow vehicle if a trailer Program a minimum of 3 load levels with a maximum of 80 kn +- 10% 18 to 30 drops in the sequence with the same sequence being used for the load cell calibration and the deflection sensor calibration 4

Results Acceptance Deflections Sensors are acceptable if the slope for an individual sensor is not more than 0.0020 The trial is acceptable if all sensors are not more than 0.0020 The calibration software will determine the Reference Gain Factor for the sensor and the RMS difference for all sensors If RMS is >0.003 it indicates some sensors may not be repeatable The Final Gain factors are compared to the previous calibration The difference shall not be higher or lower than 1% for each sensor and the load cell. A change over a number of years greater than 0.1% per year is unacceptable Calibration Certificate Summary Upon successful completion of the process a Calibration Certificate will be issued for the load cell and deflection sensors on the machine. The new AASHTO standard will be the foundation of calibration procedures both in the US and the European Road communities. Some equipment manufacturer s can now offer Calibrations of the equipment on site thanks to the new procedures and equipment developed by Dr. Irwin and AASHTO Summary Cont d Web Site Assistance Ask your engineering consultants to see the calibration records for their equipment as part of your contract requirements. This will help ensure that your data will be accurate Ask to see their testing plan and pattern to ensure it will fully meet your needs and show you that they know what they are doing. www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/ad visory_circular/150-5370- 11A/150_5370_11a.pdf www.astm.org (Available in Spanish) www.transportation.org/ (AASHTO web site) 5

Gracias por su atención Thanks also to Dr. Gonzalo Rada for helping make this presentation Questions? 6