Figure 2-14: Existing Bus Routing at Irwindale Station

Similar documents
CHAPTER 2 PROPOSED BUS ROUTE MODIFICATIONS

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Chapter 1 Project Description

9. Downtown Transit Plan

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Troost Corridor Transit Study

Blue Ribbon Committee

Proposed Service Plan

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

SERVICE IMPROVEMENT GUIDE

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

DEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY

Table 8-1: Service Frequencies for All Short-List Alternatives by Day of Week and Time of Day Frequency Day of Week Time of Day Time Period

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

3.14 Parks and Community Facilities

3.0 TRANSPORTATION ISSUES AND ANALYSIS

Delta Kappa Gamma January 22, 2018

CLAREMONT METROLINK STATION STUDY Claremont Town Hall Meeting December 11, 2017

Pomona Rotary December 19, 2017

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Analysis of Radial and Trunk Feeder Transit System Configurations in Downtown Charlottesville

MTA New York City Transit Service Guidelines Manual

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

1.0 Detailed Definition of Alternatives

Chapter 9 Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

NICTI Alternatives Analysis

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Welcome and Agenda. Thank you for joining us! 6:00 pm Open House. 6:30 pm Welcome & Presentation. 7:00 pm Q&A. 7:15 pm Open House Resumes

Community Meetings June 2018

Appendix B. Tier 2 Final Environmental Assessment I-66 Transit/TDM Technical Report

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Table City of Glendora Predicted Vibration Levels for Residential (Category 2) Land Uses

Attachment F Transportation Technical Memorandum

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

3. PRELIMINARY DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVES

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

Central Park Drives Traffic Management Overview

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

Key Transfer Stations - Technical Memo

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION

Impacts to street segments were analyzed based on procedures detailed in the Highway Capacity Manual for levels of service related to roadways.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS N. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING

3.1 Introduction Transportation Elements and Study Area Meeting the Need for the Project

Technical Feasibility Report

2.4 Build Alternatives

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

Metro Transit Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

EAST-WEST BUS RAPID TRANSIT Service Plan and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Cost Memo

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

Appendix C: GAPS ANALYSIS

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

Construction Realty Co.

Appendix G Traffic and Parking Report

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

PAPER FOR AREMA 2004 ANNUAL CONFERENCE LOS ANGELES UNION STATION RUN-THROUGH TRACKS. Paul Mak, PE, SE - DMJM HARRIS

Report of Registration County Summary

1 On Time Performance

Section 3.12 Traffic and Transportation

West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. Informational Briefing Gateway Cities Service Council April 13, 2017

Hastings Ranch Dr. Sierra Madre Bl. Sierra Madre Villa Av. Foothill Bl b. Sierra 4 Madre F187. Michillinda Av. Rosemead Bl. 487 Santa Anita Av

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

1.0 INTRODUCTION Organization of this Report Study Area EXISTING CONDITIONS CTA Rail Forest Park Branch...

Service Planning Open House

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

PAPER FOR AREMA 2006 ANNUAL CONFERENCE LOS ANGELES UNION STATION RUN-THROUGH TRACKS UNION STATION TERMINAL IMPROVEMENTS. Paul Mak, PE, SE HDR Inc

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Update

Measure R Funded Transit Projects

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Sherman Oaks Community Traffic Plan

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

DETAILED DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVES. July 2014 FINAL

West LRT. Alignment Update and Costing Report May Calgary Transit Transportation Planning Clifton ND Lea Consultants

BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) MISSISSAUGA SEGMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.

METRO SERVICE CHANGE LINE 577 EXPRESS: A TALE OF TWO BUS LINES

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND PARKING

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Rail~Volution 2005 Hal Ryan Johnson, AICP, Bus Rapid Transit Project Manager Utah Transit Authority September 7, 2005

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Transcription:

494 W oothill Blvd 69 N Irwindale Ave 185 Irwindale E 1st St 3 6 feet igure 2-14: Existing Bus Routing at Irwindale 39

Proposed Bus Route 494 W oothill Blvd Proposed Discontinued Bus Route Proposed New Layover Location Alignment 69 N Irwindale Ave 185 Irwindale E 1st St igure 2-15: Proposed Bus Routing at Irwindale 4 3 6 feet

azusa-alaeda StatION the azusa-alameda Gold Line station will be located on the side of santa fe avenue between azusa avenue and alameda avenue in the downtown area. four existing bus routes that operate in the vicinity of azusa-alameda station and interface with the station are shown in figure 2-16. 185 this local bus route carries nearly 2, passengers per weekday between Hacienda Heights and azusa via West covina and downtown azusa on an alignment that includes the proposed irwindale and alameda stations. it approaches the station vicinity from the west via foothill Boulevard and terminates at san Gabriel avenue two blocks west of the station. the results of the bus rider survey conducted for this study indicate that 68% of existing route 185 riders are likely to use the Gold Line extension and that 21% consider azusa-alameda station as the preferred point of access, which is second to irwindale station (3%). detailed ridership data for route 185 was not available for this analysis, making definitive recommendations more difficult. at a minimum it is recommended that route 185 be extended to a new terminal and layover point located adjacent to the new station entrance when the Gold Line extension opens. Buses would continue from san Gabriel avenue on foothill Boulevard, turn on azusa avenue and east on santa fe avenue to the bus stop. departing buses would turn south on alameda avenue and west on foothill Boulevard returning to irwindale. 187 this local bus route currently travels east-west on foothill Boulevard and passes one block south of the azusa-alameda station site. existing bus stops are located on both sides of foothill at the azusa avenue intersection. as described earlier, route 187 would be truncated at both ends and serve the arcadia and azusa-citrus stations. ridership data indicates that downtown azusa is a significant transit trip generator and diversion of route 187 to the station entrance on santa fe avenue is recommended. Both alameda and azusa avenues may be used for signal-protected access to and from foothill Boulevard. 28 this local route is foothill transit s second highest volume line carrying over 3,4 passengers per average weekday between Puente Hills all and downtown azusa via azusa avenue. it currently terminates one block south of the azusaalameda station via a one-way loop consisting of on azusa avenue, west on foothill Boulevard and south on san Gabriel avenue. existing bus stops are located on azusa avenue bound and on san Gabriel avenue southbound, both south of foothill Boulevard. the results of the bus rider survey conducted for this study reported that 62% of existing route 28 riders are likely to use the Gold Line extension and that the azusa-alameda station is the preferred point of access for 16% of those who expect to use the train. in comparison, azusa-citrus station is preferred by 48% of riders, and duarte is preferred by 1% of riders. detailed ridership data for route 28 was unavailable at the time of this analysis, making it more difficult to offer recommendations concerning this route. at a minimum, extension one block on azusa avenue and east on santa fe avenue to a new on-street bus stop and layover point located across the street from the Gold Line station entrance is recommended. ideally customers should have a line-of-sight visual connection to buses from the rail platform. departing southbound buses would turn south on alameda avenue, west on foothill Boulevard and south on san Gabriel avenue returning to Puente Hills all. this alignment would allow route 28 to make use of the existing bus stop located on the side of foothill Boulevard at the far side of alameda avenue. 494 this relatively low-volume express route provides weekday peak direction-only service between the san dimas Park-ride lot (site of Phase 2B Gold Line station) and the el onte Busway station on an alignment that includes three proposed Gold Line stations: azusa-citrus; azusa-alameda and onrovia. it runs primarily east-west on foothill Boulevard, Baseline road and Huntington drive east of yrtle avenue, and -south on yrtle to el onte. route 494 partially overlaps several other routes, including route 492 on arrow Highway; route 284 on Lone Hill avenue and foothill drive east of Glendora avenue; route 187 and shorter segments of several other routes on foothill Boulevard and Huntington drive, as well as etro route 27 on yrtle avenue to el onte. route 494 carries an average of 133 weekday boardings on seven one-way trips, or 19 passengers per trip. the results of the bus rider survey conducted for this study reported that 72% of existing route 494 riders are likely to use the Gold Line extension and that the azusa-alameda station is the preferred point of access for 25% of all riders, followed by azusacitrus (23%), onrovia (19%) and duarte (15%). detailed passenger boarding and alighting information was not available for analysis, making definitive recommendations more difficult. However, either truncation at the proposed azusa-citrus station or outright discontinuation of route 494 should be considered in conjunction with restructuring local services to feed passengers into the Gold Line. Given the low ridership volume on this route, it is expected that existing riders would be easily absorbed within the capacity provided by the Gold Line extension. from a policy perspective, foothill transit as well as etro should avoid providing express bus services to downtown Los angeles when feeder services to the Gold Line are available providing comparable service. Interface it is proposed that santa fe avenue be converted to have an on-street bus facility adjacent to the azusa-alameda station, between azusa avenue and alameda avenue. this proposal will improve customer convenience and help to meet operational requirements. Bus stops sufficient to accommodate three fixed-route bus routes and one paratransit or specialized transportation vehicle at azusa-alameda station should be provided. Bus route modifications are shown in figure 2-17. 41

N San Gabriel Ave E 11th St E 9th St 185 N Citrus Ave Azusa-Alameda 281 N Alameda Ave E oothill Blvd W 5th St 28 N Azusa Ave 494 igure 2-16: Existing Bus Routing at Azusa-Alameda 42 4 8 feet

E 11th St N San Gabriel Ave Proposed Bus Route Proposed Discontinued Bus Route Proposed New Layover Location Alignment E 9th St 185 E oothill Blvd 281 N Alameda Ave N Azusa Ave 28 494 N Citrus Ave Azusa-Alameda W 5th St 4 8 feet igure 2-17: Proposed Bus Routing at Azusa-Alameda 43

azusa-citrus StatION the azusa-citrus station will be located west of the intersection of citrus avenue and foothill Boulevard near the citrus community college and azusa Pacific university campuses. there are five existing bus routes that operate in the vicinity of the proposed station site as shown in figure 2-18. 187 this is foothill s most heavily utilized route carrying over 6, passengers per average weekday, 3,1 per saturday and 2,9 per sunday. a detailed discussion of boarding and alighting patterns is provided earlier in this report in the arcadia station section. route 187 travels east-west on foothill Boulevard and -south on citrus avenue in the vicinity of the azusa-citrus station site, passing several hundred feet to the south. existing bus stops are located on the east side of citrus avenue south of the curve to foothill Boulevard, and on the side of foothill Boulevard immediately east of the curve to citrus avenue. ridership data shown earlier in figures 2-5 and 2-6 indicate that the azusa-citrus station vicinity is a significant transit trip generator in both directions. Passenger volumes are higher to the west and lower to the east of the station site, with accumulated loads of approximately 6 passengers aboard weekday service in each direction at foothill Boulevard and citrus avenue. these ridership patterns support reconfiguration of route 187 to better complement the Gold Line when the line is extended. it is recommended that route 187 be divided into three shorter routes to shift longer passenger trips to the Gold Line, and refocus bus service on providing feeder trips into both azusa-citrus and arcadia stations from the east with continuing direct service provided by the Gold Line. two of the three new routes would terminate at azusa-citrus station: route 187 arcadia/azusa would operate between arcadia station and azusa-citrus station on its current alignment with minor changes to better serve the azusa-alameda station. the route should operate within a 9-minute schedule cycle, requiring six peak buses to provide peak period 15-minute headways designed to meet every other peak direction Gold Line train at arcadia station. route 188 azusa/ontclair would operate between azusa-citrus station and the ontclair transit center on an alignment similar to the present route 187, which includes intermediate stops at the Glendora and claremont stations as planned in the azusa to ontclair extension. the route should operate within a 12-minute schedule cycle, requiring eight peak buses to provide peak period 15-minute headways designed to meet every other peak direction Gold Line train at azusa-citrus station. the azusa-citrus station does have substantial needs for bus layover space. at project opening, the necessary layover space is proposed to be provided along the curbs on citrus avenue. Long-term need would be met by the bus facility on the side of the light rail alignment where all five bus routes would have layover space. 281 this local bus route carries nearly 2,1 passengers per weekday between Puente Hills all and azusa via industry, West covina and covina. it approaches azusa from the south via citrus avenue and terminates one-half mile south of the station site at the intersection of alosta avenue at citrus avenue. the results of the bus rider survey conducted for this study indicate that 74% of existing route 281 riders are likely to use the Gold Line extension, and that half of these consider the azusa-citrus station as the preferred point of access, followed by azusa-alameda (12%) and irwindale (11%). the concurrent survey of current Gold Line riders indicated that azusacitrus station is the most preferred among the six new stations as the initial point of access to the rail line. detailed ridership data for route 281 was not available for this analysis, making definitive recommendations more difficult. However, extension of the route to the azusa citrus station is strongly suggested to provide new connectivity with the Gold Line. 488 this local bus route carries nearly 1,6 passengers per weekday between el onte and Glendora via Baldwin Park, West covina and covina. it approaches the azusa-citrus station site from the south and east via south Grand avenue and foothill Boulevard, and currently terminates.5 mile east at the intersection of foothill Boulevard and Barranca avenue. the results of the bus rider survey conducted for this study indicate that 54% of existing route 488 riders are likely to use the Gold Line extension, and that 56% of these consider the azusa-citrus station as the preferred point of access, followed by azusa-alameda (9%) and irwindale (7%). detailed ridership data for route 488 was not available for this analysis, making definitive recommendations more difficult. However, extension of the route to the azusa-citrus station is strongly suggested to provide an effective feeder connection from the south Grand avenue corridor to the Gold Line, as well as an additional bus connection between the Gold Line and the san Bernadino etrolink Line in covina. 494 this relatively low-volume express route provides weekday peak direction-only service between the san dimas Park-ride lot (site of Phase 2B Gold Line station) and the el onte Busway station on an alignment that includes three Phase 2a stations: azusa-citrus; azusa-alameda and onrovia. it runs primarily east-west on foothill Boulevard, Baseline road and Huntington drive east of yrtle avenue, and -south on yrtle to el onte. route 494 partially overlaps several other routes, including route 492 on arrow Highway; route 284 on Lone Hill avenue and foothill drive east of Glendora avenue; route 187 and shorter segments of several other routes on foothill Boulevard and Huntington drive, as well as etro route 27 on yrtle avenue to el onte. route 494 carries an average of 133 weekday boardings on seven one-way trips, or 19 passengers per trip. the results of the bus rider survey conducted for this study reported that 72% of existing route 494 riders are likely to use the Gold Line extension and that the azusa-citrus station is the preferred point of access for 23% of all riders, second to azusa-alameda (25%) but ahead of onrovia (19%) and duarte (15%). detailed passenger boarding and alighting information was not available for analysis, making definitive recommendations more difficult. either truncation at azusa-citrus station or outright discontinuation should be considered in conjunction with restructuring local services to feed passengers into the Gold Line. 498 this express route provides weekday peak direction-only service between the citrus college Park-and-ride Lot in azusa and downtown Los angeles via covina and West covina. it carries 866 passengers per average weekday on 23 westbound trips to Los angeles in the morning and 25 return trips to azusa in the afternoon. average ridership per one-way trip is 18 passengers. 44

851 W Bennett Ave Azusa-Citrus W oothill Blvd los ta Av e 281 EA N Citrus Ave 488 S Grand Ave N Barranca Ave 494 498 Alosta Ave 3 6 feet igure 2-18: Existing Bus Routing at Azusa-Citrus 45

orning trips currently depart from the intersection of Barranca avenue at foothill Boulevard, which is.5 mile east of the azusa-citrus station site. Buses turn east on alosta avenue and south onto Grand avenue to the i-1 freeway. afternoon trips return via on Grand and west on foothill Boulevard to Barranca avenue. the results of the bus rider survey conducted for this study reported that 54% of existing route 498 riders are likely to use the Gold Line extension and that the azusa-citrus station is overwhelmingly preferred as the point of access by 69% of those who expect to use the Gold Line. detailed passenger boarding and alighting information was not available for analysis, making definitive recommendations more difficult. discontinuation should be considered in conjunction with restructuring local services to feed passengers into the Gold Line. from a policy perspective, foothill transit as well as etro should consider truncating or discontinuing parallel express bus services to downtown Los angeles when feeder services to the Gold Line offer comparable service. Interface this station is particularly important as an intermodal transfer point due to its dual function as a major generator of walkon passenger traffic and as the eastern terminus of the Gold Line until the azusa to Pasadena extension is completed. survey results conducted for this analysis suggest that this location will attract nine percent of total Gold Line a and P peak boardings, the most among the six new stations, and six percent of midday and night-time boardings. Projected utilization of azusa-citrus station is even higher as an alighting point, with 12% of total anticipated Gold Line passengers alighting there during midday and P peak periods 1% at night and six percent during the morning peak. the survey also indicated that 79% of respondents are interested in the extension from azusa-citrus to ontclair, suggesting that interim demand for access to azusa-citrus among residents of eastern san Gabriel Valley cities will be high. Proposed bus route modifications are shown in figure 2-19. in view of its interim significance as the Pasadena to azusa extension eastern terminus, timely construction of an offstreet bus facility adjacent to azusa-citrus station is recommended. the bus interface plan acknowledges that location and configuration of a permanent facility is contingent on development of the adjacent rosemont aster Planned community. this may require the use of on-street bus stops and a nearby off-site location where terminating buses can spend scheduled recovery time and turn around. initially buses will board and alight passengers at on-street bus stops located on both sides of foothill Boulevard at the citrus avenue curve. terminating buses would then deadhead to an off-site recovery time point. Lacking restroom facilities, this location is not suggested for extended layovers until a permanent off-street facility is constructed. 46