A Process for Mapping Component Function to Mission Completion

Similar documents
UT30MK2 & MT30 Unmanned and Manned Turrets

A SUCCESSFUL EUROPEAN COOPERATION POWERFUL & COMPACT 40 CTAS CASED TELESCOPED ARMAMENT SYSTEM

ELBIT SYSTEMS - LAND AND C 4 I. ATMOS 155mm truck-mounted howitzer for increased mobility and enhanced firing capabilities

LAND 400 Phase 2. Defending Australia and its National Interests

MINE CLEARANCE, REMOTE CONTROL AND AREA DENIAL SYSTEMS SPECIAL PROJECTS

LAND DOMAIN. Defence Led UNCLASSIFIED 2

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION

30x173mm High Explosive Air Burst Trace (HEAB-T) Capabilities for Tomorrow

Electro Optic Systems Holdings Limited

Statement of Jim Schoppenhorst, Director, DD(X) BAE Systems / Armament Systems Division. Before the

EW Engagement Modelling for Light Armoured Vehicles

Mega Engineering vehicles. the next generation of advanced apc

WORLD CLASS through people, technology and dedication

Zeppelin The German Airship For use in Axis & Allies 1914 Board Game Historical Board Gaming v1.0

NDIA 2010 Numerical Prediction of Large Caliber Cannon Impulse. Bob Carson Mechanical Engineer Fluid Dynamics Analyst Date: 19 May 2010

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

TECHNICAL SUPPORT ASSETS COMPOSITION

RESTRICTED AN 01 -SEC - 2 PILOT'S FLIGHT OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ARMY MODELS. B-24D and J

Wer wolf MKII Modular Mine Protected Vehicle

INTEGRATED COMBAT SOLUTION

Army Ground Vehicle Use of CFD and Challenges

HELLFIRE. The following presents products and product configurations in development. Qualification of the product is ongoing.

Table of Contents. Preface... x. Section 1. Assuming the Duties of Game Master Section 2. Generating Characters... 3

OPERATOR S MANUAL HOWITZER, HEAVY, SELF-PROPELLED 8-INCH, M110A2

Universal MachineGun Sight (UMS) Red/Green Dot Sight for Crew Served Weapons (Model: UMS-XXX)

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

FLYEYE Unmanned Aerial System

COMPANY COMMANDER SUPPORT WEAPONS TACTICAL BRIEFING ON SUPPORT WEAPONS

CBU-89 Gator Mine. FAS Military DOD 101 Systems Dumb Bombs Index Search.

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

Beyond Design Basis Analysis:

ARDEC Rapid Design Projects for Field Support Part 1

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

ITA Titanium 2005 M777A1 Howitzer Cost Reduction Efforts 27 September 2005

OPERATOR S MANUAL. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

WARGAME RULES 20mm Scale Russo-German War c. 1943

Innovative Designs to Improve Medium Calibre Ammunition Effectiveness. Parari Eelko van Meerten

Future infantry squads shall be equipped with lighter, Safer, programmable but more lethal ammunition

The AGM-114K-2A Missile Enhanced Lethality Design and Test

Lockheed Martin. Team IDK Seung Soo Lee Ray Hernandez Chunyu PengHarshal Agarkar

Т38 STILET. Air Defense Missile System

Tires are available in a number of sizes and tread patterns dependent on the vehicle usage. Tire sizes are as follows:

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

30mm Airburst Development Translating Lessons Learned into System Requirements 40 th Annual Guns and Ammunition Conference April 2005 New

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FROM VENDORS FOR DESIGNS FOR A FUTURE READY COMBAT VEHICLE FOR INDIAN ARMY

Fire Power Forum. DISTRIBUTION A: Approved for Public Release.

Table of Contents. Abstract... Pg. (2) Project Description... Pg. (2) Design and Performance... Pg. (3) OOM Block Diagram Figure 1... Pg.

FUNCTIONAL SAFETY SOLUTIONS in Solenoid Valves

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Family of Heavy Tactical Vehicles

Precise Indirect Fires. Mr. Bart Barcellos. Raytheon

Camouflaging Vehicles Using Field Expedient Materials, Commercial Hardware Store Materials, Camouflage Nets, and Rubber Conveyer Belt Material

(2111) Digital Test Rolling REVISED 07/22/14 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP

Up-Armored HMMWV CASEVAC Conversion Kit (UAH-CCK)

PE" " 1TAT10N PAGE omb Iyo ,88. I-e El. -a Sl sl.or-o'',,ip9oc.a-,,.

FIRE CONTAINMENT GUIDE

PRODUCT OPTIMIZATION SUPPORT 40 MM HV ABM. Federica Valente, H. Huisjes, T. Soullié, A. M. Kruse

Panzer Grenadiers 255 MP (45) Munitions Halftrack 200 MP 15 Fuel. Vampire Halftrack 220 MP. Mortar Halftrack 240 MP 40 Fuel

DYNAMIC LOAD IN OPERATION OF HIGH-SPEED TRACKED VEHICLES

ABRAHAM to RAM. Börje Nyquist Director BAE Systems Bofors AB. Bofors AB Proprietary & Competition Sensitive 1

Country Name Commodity Quantity License Value PHILIPPINES (Continued)

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

LOW RECOIL, HEAT TRANSFER MITIGATING RAREFACTION WAVE GUN ENGINEERING, MODELING AND LARGE CALIBER SYSTEM DEMONSTRATOR DEVELOPMENT

Adaptation of Existing Fuze Technology to Increase the Capability of the Navy s 2.75-Inch Rocket System

ENERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWERTRAIN AND CHASSIS INTEGRATED SIMULATION ON A MILITARY DUTY CYCLE

Cooperative EVA/Telerobotic Surface Operations in Support of Exploration Science

ARMORED VEHICLE RECOGNITION

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY PROVISIONAL TEMPLATE

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Jay Gundlach AIAA EDUCATION SERIES. Manassas, Virginia. Joseph A. Schetz, Editor-in-Chief. Blacksburg, Virginia. Aurora Flight Sciences

MARAUDER LAND SYSTEMS ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS AEROSPACE LEADERS IN DEFENCE AND SECURITY INNOVATION

Variable Valve Drive From the Concept to Series Approval

ANNUAL REPORT ON EXPORTS AND IMPORTS OF CONVENTIONAL ARMS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 13(3) OF THE ARMS TRADE TREATY. Col. (Rtd.) Saa Anthony Sinah

Anti-Vehicle (Anti-tank) Mines

Tank-Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center

45th Annual Armament Systems: Gun and Missile Systems Conference & Exhibition Event #0610 May 17-20, 2010 Dallas, Texas

Top 9 Attack Helicopters

Defense Green Technology of KOREA

Panzerhaubitze mm Self- Propelled Howitzer - Archived 4/2000

This We'll Defend. Russell Phillips. Shilka Publishing U. S. A R M Y

Contents. Preface... xiii Introduction... xv. Chapter 1: The Systems Approach to Control and Instrumentation... 1

Appendix C. Safety Analysis Electrical System. C.1 Electrical System Architecture. C.2 Fault Tree Analysis

Chapter 8. Example Point Design - Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses

CTAS Maturity Briefing 9 th April David Leslie, Chairman CTAI

IMPORTANT WARRANTY & INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS ATTACHED

PRESS KIT IDEB 2018 May 16th May 18th 2018

ANTIARMOR WEAPONS SUBCOURSE OVERVIEW

THERMAL TARGET RECOGNITION, IDENTIFICATION, ENGAGEMENT

Protecting the Warfighter

Fire Fighting Equipment Development - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Trials. Ripley Valley Rural Fire Brigade - August 2010

XM mm PROXIMITY FUZE EXPLOSIVE TRAIN DESIGN

RUles summary. The TURN TURN SEQUENCE ORDERS MOVEMENT FUBAR CHART. Appendix II TROOP QUALITY AND MORALE OFFICER MORALE MODIFERS

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Warning! Before continuing further, please ensure that you have NOT mounted the propellers on the MultiRotor.

ANALYTICAL EVALUATION OF ENGINE AND VEHICLE HARDWARE EFFECTS ON VEHICLE RESPONSE. Drew Raftopoulos

Guns & Missiles Symposium #11725

Country / Designation Commodity Quantity License Value

AGM-114 Hellfire. Version: Basic Interim HF II Longbow Diameter: 7 in 7 in 7 in 7 in Weight: 100 lb 107 lb 100 lb 108 lb

White Paper. How Do I Know I Can Rely on It? The Business and Technical Cases for Solar-Recharged Video Surveillance Systems

Grenade Launchers in China

Transcription:

UNCLASSIFIED A Process for Mapping Component Function to Mission Completion 2010 Mar 02 1 UNCLASSIFIED

Contact and Special Thanks Kevin Agan Mechanical Engineer ARL/SLAD (410) 278-4458 Kevin.Agan@arl.army.mil Special thanks to: Bill Landis Mechanical Engineer ARL/SLAD (410) 278-2675 Wlandis@arl.army.mil 2

Agenda Issue / Introduction Paradigm Preview A Required Tool: Fault Tree Analysis Paradigm Explanation The Mission and Means Framework Example: A simple tank battle Example: Networked UAV and SPH 3

Issue A process is needed to evaluate the loss of component function in networked systems to the completion of the mission. 4

Established industry process As a best practice, the consumer product industry has been conducting task-based component analysis for decades. Mission: Task 1 Task 2... Task n Functionality: Component 1 Component 2... Component n 5

A preliminary process for ARL A preliminary process has been developed within ARL/SLAD that can correlate component availability to the completion of Army standard mission tasks. This process is currently being tested and improved. 6

Focus of Analysis Using fundamentals from systems and reliability engineering: Quantitatively define what the system and personnel can accomplish (tasks). Quantitatively define what components are required to accomplish these tasks. Focus of analysis is remaining capability. Maintain terminology familiar to the military user: Attainable Speed Send/Receive Communications Execute Fire Missions 7

A preview of the process Mission Task System Tasks System Functions Sub-System 8

Existing Tool: Fault Tree Fault Tree: a logic diagram that represents operating relationships. As long as a functioning path can be traced from beginning to end, then the operation and/or capability is maintained. Each level of the paradigm comprises of Fault Tree relationships to the level below. Series Parallel Parent Parent Child 1 Child 1 Child 2 Child 2 Child 3 Child 4 9

The component is the lowest level of the analysis. The component is the individual hardware that is required for a system to function. Gear Tire Oil Filter Fuel Tank 10

For each component, failure modes and or operating conditions are defined. Standard operating conditions Probability of Component Dysfunction Given a Hit (PCD H) {Probability of Kill (P K )} Consider all modes and conditions with respect to successful operation given an insult or use. With an insult to a component, evaluate to see if it is available and functioning. 11

Sub-Systems A Sub-System is an assembled collection of components that work together to fulfill a specific purpose. Examples: Automatic Transmission Wheel, Front Left Lubrication System Fuel System Fuel Tank Fuel Filter Sub-System Fuel System Fuel Pump Fuel Lines 12

System Functions A System Function is an observable, repeatable, and measureable performance of the sub-systems. Examples: Maintain Cooling (Engine) Generate Energy from Fuel Transmit Electrical Power Transfer Power to the Wheels Cooling sub-system example: To maintain the proper operating temperature of the engine, the cooling system needs to remove waste heat from the system. The fans and related drive trains are required to maintain adequate air-flow. Maintain Cooling (Engine) Fan System Functions Sub-System Cooling System Fan gear box 13

System Functions System Functions can be either binary or probabilistic: Maintain Cooling (Engine) Cooling System Fan 1 IR-signal detection Maximum Fan gear box State: System Function Value: All parts functional 1.0 Probability of detection 0.6 Strong Moderate Weak Fan failed 0.0 0 Distance from signal source 14

System Task A System Task is a mutually independent performance of the system. This task is observable, measurable, and repeatable. For a light-duty four-wheeled vehicle, some sample System Tasks are: Operate in night conditions Travel off-road Travel on-roads Protect crew Communicate short-range Communicate long-range Communicate intra-vehicle Haul trailer System Tasks System Functions Sub-System 15

System Task Bins As damage is applied, a System Task could degrade into subsequent bins of performance, as seen below. Travel on Roads Damage state Communicate short-range Damage state Can travel 31 to 50 mph Undamaged Data and voice Undamaged Can travel 11 to 30 mph Two flat tires, on run-flats Data only Hand-mike failed Can travel 1 to 10 mph Four flat tires, on run-flats Voice only Radio computer failed NOT possible Tires completed destroyed NOT possible Radio failed At any given time and damage state, a system will exist in only one of the bins. 16

System Task Bins Travel on Roads Can travel 31 to 50 mph Can travel 11 to 30 mph Support Weight of Vehicle at All Wheels Support Weight of Vehicle at 2 Wheels Maintain Traction at All Wheels Maintain Traction at 2 Wheels Transfer Power to All Wheels Transfer Power to 2 Wheels Generate Power from Engine Generate Power from Engine Provide Fuel to Engine Provide Fuel to Engine Provide Air to Engine Provide Air to Engine Maintain Proper Engine Temp. Maintain Proper Engine Temp. Decelerate Rapidly Front Braking Accelerate Rapidly Accelerate Rapidly Maintain Directional Control Maintain Directional Control Change Gears Change Gears Provide Alternator Power Provide Battery Power Provide Alternator Power Provide Battery Power 17

Mission Tasks A Mission Task is the operational task that is to be executed by the soldiers and systems working in concert. For the Army, the Mission Tasks are defined in Field Manual (FM) 7-15 The Army Universal Task List (AUTL). Examples of Mission Tasks: Conduct a raid Conduct direct fires Hold an objective Mission Task System Tasks System Functions Sub-System 18

A Brief Sample Mission Task System Tasks System Functions Conduct Indirect Fires Aim on Target, Indirect Fires Traverse gun Sub-System Powered traverse system Gear case, traverse mechanism 19

A Sample Mission Task System Tasks Operate in daytime conditions Mission Task Conduct Indirect Fires Aim on target, Indirect Fires Fire Munition Maintain internal communications Send/Receive Short- Range Communications Protect Crew Prevent Catastrophic Loss 20

A Piece of a Sample Mission Task Mission Task System Tasks System Function Sub-System Conduct Indirect Fires Operate in daytime conditions Aim on target, In-Direct Fires Fire Muniton Maintain internal communications Send/Receive Short-Range Communications Open breechblock Retrieve Munition Load / Ram Munition Retrieve Propellant Load / Ram Propellant Close breechblock Retrieve primer Breechblock Access System Breech System Operating handle detent plunger Operating handle Operating crank roller Cradle cam Protect Crew Prevent Catastrophic Loss Install primer Attach firing lanyard Gunner pulls lanyard and fires munition 21

MMF Application: Two Battle Tanks This example will look at a simplified hypothetical engagement. Context (military, political, physical, ) BLUFOR s purpose, mission OPFOR s purpose, mission Index: Location in time and space Mission Tasks, Operations Mission Tasks, Operations Functions, Capabilities Interactions & Effects Functions Capabilities Forces, Forces, BLUFOR OPFOR Source: Fundamentals of Ground Combat System Ballistic Vulnerability / Lethality ; Dietz, et. al., pg 14 22

MMF Example Tank A (OPFOR) observes Tank B (BLUFOR) move into effective range. All Tank A components are functional The system can accomplish the Execute Direct Fire System Task An anti-tank round is fired. Sub-Systems: Cannon system Recoil System Counter-recoil system Breech Ring Tank A detecting and firing on Tank B System Functions: Retrieve munition Load munition Traverse turret Elevate cannon System Tasks: Maintain Situational Awareness Execute Direct Fire Protect from Catastrophic Loss Mission Tasks, Operations Mission Tasks, Operations Fire control computer Firing mechanism Fire munition Reset cannon Functions, Capabilities Interactions & Effects Functions Capabilities Forces, Forces, 23

MMF Example The round fired from Tank A impacts Tank B on the track and road wheels. The interaction of the round with the track, road wheels, and suspension will cause those components to fail. The only resultant capability for Travel Off-Road is NOT possible. Mission Functions, Capabilities Tasks, Operations Interactions & Effects Mission Tasks, Operations Functions Capabilities Sub-Systems: R3 Road wheel Tire Wheel Hub Road Arm Road Arm Anchor Penetrator impacting Tank B: System Functions: Brake Vehicle Change gears Generate power from fuel Transfer power to tracks Maintain track tension, Right Track Maintain traction, Right Track Support system weight at R1 Support system weight at R2 Support system weight at R3 Support system weight at R4 System Tasks: Travel Off-Road 15 20 mph 10-15mph 5 10 mph < 5 mph NOT Possible Maintain Situational Awareness Execute Direct Fire Protect from Catastrophic Loss Forces, Forces,. 24

MMF Example Tank B returns fire on Tank A. All firepower components are functional. Capable of all Firepower System Tasks. Mission Tasks, Operations Mission Tasks, Operations Sub-systems: Cannon system Recoil System Counter-recoil system Breech Ring Fire control computer Firing mechanism Tank B returning fire System Functions: Acquire target Retrieve munition Load munition Traverse turret Elevate cannon Fire munition Reset cannon System Tasks: Travel Off-Road Maintain Situational Awareness Execute Direct Fire Prevent Catastrophic Loss Functions, Capabilities Interactions & Effects Functions Capabilities Forces, Forces, 25

MMF Example The round from Tank B impacts the side of Tank A. Sub-Systems Penetrator acting on Tank A System Functions: System Tasks: The penetrator from the Tank B passes through the armor of the Tank A. Upon entering the interior, either spall or the main penetrator interact with energetic material. This interaction results in a catastrophic detonation. Stored Propellant Propellant in Tube 1 Propellant in Tube 2 Protect Munitions Protect Propellant. Maintain Situational Awareness Execute Direct Fire Prevent Catastrophic Loss Propellant in Tube 3 Mission Tasks, Operations Mission Tasks, Operations Propellant in Tube 4 Propellant in Tube 5 Functions, Capabilities Interactions & Effects Functions Capabilities. Forces, Forces, 26

MMF Example Tank A has experienced a catastrophic event. Sub-systems: The final state of Tank A System Functions: System Tasks: Due to the loss of all components: all Tank A System Functions are not available, all Tank A System Tasks are not available, the Tank A Mission Tasks cannot be completed. Cannon system Recoil System Counter-recoil system Breech Ring Retrieve munition Load munition Traverse turret Elevate cannon Maintain Situational Awareness Execute Direct Fire Prevent Catastrophic Loss Fire control computer Fire munition Mission Mission Firing mechanism Reset cannon Tasks, Operations Tasks, Operations Functions, Capabilities Interactions & Effects Functions Capabilities Forces, Forces, 27

Networked Forces Application: UAV as a Forward Observer In a future combat scenario, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) functions as a forward observer for a self-propelled howitzer (SPH). 28

UAV Sample Definition The UAV, while on patrol, flies within detection range of a possible target emitting IR radiation. Observe for Artillery Fires Operate in daytime conditions Maintain Powered Flight Maintain Navigation Detect Target (IR) Observe Target (Video) Designate Target Maintain Electrical Power Energize IR Sensor Detect Signature (IR) Probability of detection 1 0.6 0 IR-signal detection Maximum Strong Moderate Weak Distance from signal source IR Sensor Send/Receive Long- Range Communications Compare to signature library IR Sensor System IR Sensor Mount IR Sensor Lens Prevent Catastrophic Loss Designate signature as Target 29 Mission Task System Tasks System Function Sub-System

UAV Sample Definition Because the UAV detected the target, it will send a communication to the emplaced SPH. Operate in daytime conditions Observe for Artillery Fires Maintain Powered Flight Maintain Navigation Detect Target (IR) Provide power to radio Provide power to transmitter Observe Target (Video) Designate Target Send transmission Antenna mount Send/Receive Long- Range Communications Receive transmission Antenna System Antenna Wires Prevent Catastrophic Loss Transmitter System 30 Mission Task System Tasks System Function Sub-System

SPH Sample Definition Since all communication components are functional, the SPH is able to receive the fire mission. Operate in daytime conditions Conduct Indirect Fires Aim on target, In-Direct Fires Fire Muniton Maintain internal communications Provide power to radio Antenna mount Send/Receive Long- Range Communications Protect Crew Provide power to transmitter Send transmission Antenna System Antenna Wires Prevent Catastrophic Loss Receive transmission Radio System 31 Mission Task System Tasks System Function Sub-System

SPH Sample Definition Since all firepower components are functional, the SPH is able to execute the indirect fire mission. Conduct Indirect Fires Operate in daytime conditions Aim on target, In-Direct Fires Fire Muniton Maintain internal communications Open breechblock Retrieve Muntion Load / Ram Munition Retrieve Propellant Load / Ram Propellant Close breechblock Breechblock Access System Breech System Sub-System Operating handle detent plunger Operating handle Operating crank roller Cradle cam 32 Mission Task Send/Receive Long- Range Communications Protect Crew Prevent Catastrophic Loss System Tasks Retrieve primer Install primer Attach firing lanyard Gunner pulls lanyard System Function

Networked Systems Mission Connect systems by mutual System Tasks. As the UAV detected the target, it was able to send the information to the SPH. As the SPH was able to receive communications, it was able to fire on the target. Observe for Artillery Fires Operate in day conditions Operate in day conditions Conduct Indirect Fires Maintain Powered Flight Aim on target, Indirect Fires Open breechblock Maintain Electrical Power Maintain Navigation Fire Muniton Retrieve Muntion Load / Ram Muniton Energize IR Sensor Detect Signature (IR) Detect Target (IR) Observe Target (Video) Maintain internal communications Retrieve Propellant Load / Ram Propellant Compare to signature library Designate Target Send/Receive Long- Range Communications Close breechblock Retrieve primer Designate signature as Target Send/Receive Long-Range Communications Protect Crew Install primer Attach firing lanyard Prevent Catastrophic Loss Prevent Catastrophic Loss Gunner pulls lanyard 33

Summary Traditionally, V/L analysis has focused on single vehicle vulnerability. Example: Firepower Loss of Function (F LoF) = 0.7 Mission context averaged across all missions. The presented process: Mission context is maintained. The single vehicle is now assessed for remaining capability. Reports ability to complete tasks. Reports ability to complete mission. By quantitatively defining a system s functionality and linking to descriptive tasks, we are able to link independent systems and evaluate the impact to the mission. 34