Similar documents
APPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets

LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW

Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis

Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida

Provide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;

Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet)

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois

MEMORANDUM November 19, 2012

Date: December 20, Project #:

One Harbor Point Residential

10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis

KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266

Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis

Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality

June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Traffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study

Barrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study

MEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC

JRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:

Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia

APPENDICES. No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016)

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

C. iv) Analysis/Results

Village of Richmond Transportation Brief

April Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief

Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc Hazeldean Road. Transportation Impact Study. Ottawa, Ontario. Project ID

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use

DIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017

BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive. Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc.

APPENDIX G. Traffic Data

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Intersection LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive N B 16.1 B 17.5

Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview

Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

Parking/Traffic Assessment Study

(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals

MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA

Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE

JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Upper Broadway Road Diet Summary of Findings

Memorandum. Megan Costa, SOCPA Sam Gordon, Town of DeWitt Jeanie Gleisner, CNYRPDB Meghan Vitale DATE: April 20, 2017

ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report

Proposed Pit Development

Half Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment. Full Report. March 15, Prepared for: Mattamy Homes.

RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS

Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit Application Transportation Assessment

STANDARD LIMITATIONS

Interstate 80 Corridor Study

MMM Group Limited. Communities. Transportation. Buildings. Infrastructure

MEMORANDUM BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION. DATE March 1, 2012

830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality

Appendix B: Traffic Reports

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Wellington Street West

1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief

1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace

267 O Connor Street Residential Development

LEMON FLATS SECOND ACCESS

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Prescott Plaza Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX 1.1: APPROVED TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPING AGREEMENT TIA Report.docx

700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1. Submitted by:

Critical Movement* Delay (sec/veh) Critical Movement* LOS 8 a.m. 9 a.m. B 25.2 C. 3 p.m. 4 p.m. B 17.3 B

Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation

FIRGROVE ELEMENTARY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

CitiGate Retail Development

Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF CANADA 1021 THOMAS SPRATT PLACE TRANSPORTATION BRIEF

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Traffic Impact Study. Residences at Bancroft Block 14, Lot 2 Borough of Haddonfield, Camden County, New Jersey

Tijuana River Valley Regional Park Campground and Education Center

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development

1 st Street Intersection Study

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

Appendix E: Emission Reduction Calculations

Lakeside Terrace Development

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA. Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825

Transcription:

Traffic Analysis For Approved Uses within the St. Lucie West DRI Aldi Port St. Lucie, FL Prepared for: Bohler Engineering, LLC 1000 Corporate Drive Suite 250 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334 Prepared by: 10795 SW Civic Lane Port St. Lucie, FL 34987 (772) 345-1948 009002 December 2013 MacKenzie Engineering and Planning, Inc. CA 29013 Shaun G. MacKenzie P.E. PE Number 61751

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... i APPENDICES... i LIST OF TABLES... i LIST OF FIGURES... ii INTRODUCTION... 1 CURRENT DATA... 3 TRIP GENERATION... 4 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION... 5 ACCESS... 5 AVAILABLE DRI USES... 7 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS... 7 CONCLUSION... 8 APPENDICES... 9 APPENDICES Volume Development Spread Sheets Pre-Development Intersection Analysis Post Development Intersection Analysis LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Proposed Trip Generation... 4 Table 2. Intersection Level of Service... 7 009001 Page i

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Site Location Map... 1 Figure 2. Concept Plan... 2 Figure 3. Driveway Trips... 6 009002 Page ii

INTRODUCTION An Aldi grocery store is proposed at the southeast corner of Cashmere Boulevard and St. Lucie West Boulevard in Port St. Lucie, Florida. Figure 1 illustrates the site location. Aldi is proposing a 16,305 square foot store. A concept plan for the store is shown in Figure 2. The proceeding analysis will review the proposed site with respect to traffic capacity. Figure 1. Site Location Map ALDI 009002 Page 1

Figure 2. Concept Plan 009002 Page 2

CURRENT DATA The information contained below was used to develop the foregoing traffic analysis. Trip Generation, 9 th Edition (ITE report) City, State and County Traffic Data MacKenzie Engineering Traffic Data St. Lucie MPO 009002 Page 3

TRIP GENERATION Trip Generation The trip generation was projected based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) report Trip Generation, 9 th Edition. Table 1 displays the proposed uses and the resulting trip generation. Table 1. Proposed Trip Generation Aldi Trip Generation Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips Total In Out Total In Out Proposed Site Traffic Supermarket 16.305 1000 SF 1,667 55 34 21 204 104 100 Subtotal 1,667 55 34 21 204 104 100 Pass-By Traffic* Supermarket 36.0% 600 20 12 8 73 37 36 Subtotal 600 20 12 8 73 37 36 NET PROPOSED TRIPS 1,067 35 22 13 131 67 64 Total Proposed Driveway Volumes 1,667 55 34 21 204 104 100 NET CHANGE IN TRIPS (FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONCURRENCY) 1,067 35 22 13 131 67 64 NET CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY VOLUMES 1,667 55 34 21 204 104 100 Note: Trip generation was calculated using the following data: Pass-by AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use ITE Code Unit Daily Rate Rate in/out Rate in/out Equation Supermarket 850 1000 SF 102.24 36% 62/38 3.40 51/49 Ln(T) = 0.74 Ln(X) + 3.25 Internal Capture Internal capture is 0 because the project is a single use. Pass-by Capture A 36 percent pass-by capture rate was applied to the trip generation using ITE s report Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition, Land-Use 850 (Supermarket). 009002 Page 4

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Traffic distribution and assignment was determined using engineering judgment, trip lengths based on the uses and from a review of the roadway network. The overall distribution is summarized by general directions and is depicted below: NORTH - 25 percent SOUTH - 25 percent EAST - 25 percent WEST - 25 percent ACCESS The proposed Project site has two points of access. The accesses are as follows: Existing Cashmere Boulevard Right-in/right-out Proposed St. Lucie West Boulevard Right-in/right-out Access to the site is proposed via two access driveways, both are right-in/right-out driveways. The primary entrance into the Home Depot center on Cashmere Boulevard contains a southbound leftturn lane and a northbound right-turn lane. A site plan is attached within Appendix D. Figure 2 displays the proposed access and projected driveway volumes. 009002 Page 5

Figure 3. Driveway Trips RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT 45.0% (47) 15 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT 0 4 1 0 (20) (5) 0.0% 20.0% 5.0% 547 41 (67) (5) 19 1 0% 0 0 11 (50) 50% 0 0 0% RIGHT-IN / RIGHT- OUT 7 (21) 20% 580 (71) 18 FULL ACCESS 30% (31) 0 0 0% 10 5 (25) 25% 7 2 (21) (5) 20% 5% PROJECT DRIVEWAY TRIPS 498 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily (61) Total In Out Total In Out 17 1,667 55 34 21 204 104 100 Aldi PROPOSED PROJECT DRIVEWAY TRAFFIC 1667 (204) 23 Total daily driveway trips PM peak hour driveway trips AM peak hour directional driveway trips 009002 Page 6

AVAILABLE DRI USES Adequate entitlements exist within the DRI for development of this proposal. All transportation conditions related to this development have been satisfied based on a review of Resolution 10-R47; therefore transportation improvements associated with this property have been satisfied by the St. Lucie West DRI. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Two intersections will primarily be affected by the development, St. Lucie West Boulevard & Cashmere Boulevard and Cashmere Boulevard & Home Depot driveway. In order to provide a conservative analysis, we projected traffic volumes for the currently vacant Albertsons shopping center and added those into the pre-development condition. Both intersections were analyzed using Synchro 8 traffic analysis software. Intersection St. Lucie West Blvd & Cashmere Boulevard Cashmere Blvd & Home Depot Driveway * Major Street / Minor Street Table 2. Intersection Level of Service Pre- Development LOS D (45.0 sec/veh) A/C* Post Development LOS D (45.3 sec/veh) A/C* Both intersections are projected to operate acceptably in 2015 with the project and with a store generating trips equivalent to Albertsons on the west side of Cashmere Boulevard. 009002 Page 7

CONCLUSION An Aldi grocery store is proposed at the southeast corner of Cashmere Boulevard and St. Lucie West Boulevard in Port St. Lucie, Florida. Aldi is proposing a 16,305 square foot store. The project is vested for concurrency since it is within the approved St. Lucie West DRI and the St. Lucie West DRI has satisfied all of its transportation obligations. The intersections of St. Lucie West Boulevard & Cashmere Boulevard and Cashmere Boulevard & Home Depot driveway are projected to operate acceptably in 2015 with the project and with a store generating trips equivalent to Albertsons on the west side of Cashmere Boulevard. 009002 Page 8

APPENDICES

Aldi Trip Generation for Vacant Shopping Center at SW Corner of Cashmere & SLW Blvd Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips Total In Out Total In Out Existing Site Traffic Gen. Commercial 37.979 1000 SF 3,619 86 53 33 313 150 163 Subtotal 3,619 86 53 33 313 150 163 Pass-By Traffic Gen. Commercial 51.7% 1,871 44 27 17 162 78 84 Subtotal 1,871 44 27 17 162 78 84 NET EXISTING TRIPS 1,748 42 26 16 151 72 79 Proposed Site Traffic Gen. Commercial 96.698 1000 SF 6,644 153 95 58 586 281 305 Subtotal 6,644 153 95 58 586 281 305 Pass-By Traffic Gen. Commercial 39.4% 2,618 60 37 23 231 111 120 Subtotal 2,618 60 37 23 231 111 120 NET PROPOSED TRIPS 4,026 93 58 35 355 170 185 Total Proposed Driveway Volumes 6,644 153 95 58 586 281 305 NET CHANGE IN TRIPS (FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONCURRENCY) 2,278 51 32 19 204 98 106 NET CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY VOLUMES 3,025 67 42 25 273 131 142 Note: Trip generation was calculated using the following data: Pass-by AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use ITE Code Unit Daily Rate Rate in/out Rate in/out Equation Gen. Commercial 820 1000 SF Ln(T) = 0.65 Ln(X) + 5.83 Ln(T)=-0.29 Ln(T) = 0.61 Ln(T) = 0.67 Ln(X) 62/38 48/52 Ln(X)+5 Ln(X)+2.24 + 3.31 c:\users\cad\documents\jobs - share drive\009 - bohler\002 - aldi\[aldi traffic.xlsx]tgen (2) Copyright 2013, MacKenzie Engineering and Planning, Inc.

Aldi PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 4 Cashmere Boulevard & St. Lucie West ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr totals 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 1 16 301 47 17 43 232 53 46 21 27 77 46 36 962 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 3 19 273 49 13 37 262 54 76 43 27 70 57 37 1017 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 0 28 293 60 13 42 231 67 68 35 34 69 41 24 1005 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 1 24 281 42 9 44 262 63 36 39 44 94 46 42 1026 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 0 23 343 59 7 31 279 59 66 30 20 101 44 25 1087 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 0 33 262 47 12 45 229 84 46 17 31 72 43 23 944 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 1 24 362 53 7 38 307 69 42 29 37 72 31 26 1097 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 2 19 263 48 10 46 257 54 53 23 33 78 36 19 939 186 2378 405 326 2059 503 433 237 253 633 344 232 8077 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 4010 4:15 PM 5:15 PM 4135 4:30 PM 5:30 PM 4062 4:45 PM 5:45 PM 2 104 1248 201 35 158 1077 275 0 190 115 132 0 339 164 116 4154 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 4067 ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr 2 104 1248 201 35 158 1077 275 0 190 115 132 0 339 164 116 439 414 119 182 ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr 10/3/2013 2 104 1248 201 35 158 1077 275 0 190 115 132 0 339 164 116 Count Taken: 10/3/2013 Buildout year: 2014 Growth Rate: 1.00% Seasonal Factor: 1.11 ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr 2014 2 116 1399 225 39 177 1207 308 0 213 128 147 0 380 183 130 0% 0% 0% 0% Diversion* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Committed 11 27 16 0 0 25 0 0 0 16 0 11 0 0 25 0 Pre W/Committed 13 143 1415 225 39 202 1207 308 0 229 128 158 0 380 208 130 Pre W/ Div 13 143 1415 225 39 202 1207 308 0 229 128 158 0 380 208 130 Project 0 0 10 7 10 7 0 0 0 16 16 0 0 10 7 0 Post 13 143 1425 232 49 209 1207 308 0 245 144 158 0 390 215 130 Project Traffic Assignment In In In In Out Out In In 0% 0% 15% 10% 15% 10% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 0% 0% 15% 10% 0% Intersections 12-02-13

Aldi PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT 4 Cashmere Boulevard & Cashmere Corners ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr totals 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 0 6 2 4 0 10 2 7 0 12 44 5 0 10 62 7 171 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 0 10 1 6 0 9 2 4 0 12 97 7 0 14 56 2 220 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 0 11 0 3 0 13 1 8 0 3 73 11 0 24 116 2 265 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 0 4 1 3 0 13 0 9 0 2 65 7 0 9 72 3 188 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 PM 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 PM 7:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 4 16 45 5 28 29 279 30 57 306 14 844 5:15 PM 6:15 PM 0 31 4 16 0 45 5 28 0 29 279 30 0 57 306 14 844 5:30 PM 6:30 PM 673 5:45 PM 6:45 PM 453 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 188 6:15 PM 7:15 PM 0 ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr 0 31 4 16 0 45 5 28 0 29 279 30 0 57 306 14 17 22 116 142 ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr 10/3/2013 0 31 4 16 0 45 5 28 0 29 279 30 0 57 306 14 Count Taken: 10/3/2013 Buildout year: 2014 Growth Rate: 1.00% Seasonal Factor: 1.11 ebu ebl ebt ebr wbu wbl wbt wbr nbu nbl nbt nbr sbu sbl sbt sbr 2014 0 34 4 17 0 50 5 31 0 32 312 33 0 63 343 15 0% 0% 0% 0% Diversion* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Committed 11 27 16 0 0 25 0 0 0 16 0 11 0 0 25 0 Pre W/Committed 11 61 20 17 0 75 5 31 0 48 312 44 0 63 368 15 Pre W/ Div 11 61 20 17 0 75 5 31 0 48 312 44 0 63 368 15 Project 0 0 10 7 10 7 0 0 0 16 16 0 0 10 7 0 Post 11 61 30 24 10 82 5 31 0 64 328 44 0 73 375 15 Project Traffic Assignment In In In In Out Out In In 0% 0% 15% 10% 15% 10% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 0% 0% 15% 10% 0% Intersections 12-02-13

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Pre 3: Cashmere Blvd & St. Lucie West Blvd Timing Plan: PM Lane Group EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 13 143 1415 225 39 202 1207 308 229 128 158 380 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 370 370 780 0 370 0 365 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Ped Bike Factor 0.91 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3433 3539 1583 0 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3117 3539 1583 0 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 219 250 98 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1048 957 580 Travel Time (s) 23.8 21.8 13.2 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 180 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 14 155 1538 245 42 220 1312 335 249 139 172 413 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 169 1538 245 0 262 1312 335 249 139 172 413 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment R NA Left Left Right R NA Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Median Width(ft) 30 30 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 9 9 15 9 15 9 15 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Left Left Thru Right Left Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 20 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 6 20 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 1

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Pre 3: Cashmere Blvd & St. Lucie West Blvd Timing Plan: PM Lane Group SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 208 130 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 365 Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 141 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 1268 Travel Time (s) 28.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 226 141 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 226 141 Enter Blocked Intersection No No Lane Alignment Left Right Median Width(ft) 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 4 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 2

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Pre 3: Cashmere Blvd & St. Lucie West Blvd Timing Plan: PM Lane Group EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Permitted Phases 2 6 8 Detector Phase 5 5 2 2 1 1 6 6 3 8 8 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 9.5 21.5 21.5 9.5 9.5 21.5 21.5 9.5 21.5 21.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 18.3 18.3 77.0 77.0 20.0 20.0 78.7 78.7 31.5 25.9 25.9 27.1 Total Split (%) 12.2% 12.2% 51.3% 51.3% 13.3% 13.3% 52.5% 52.5% 21.0% 17.3% 17.3% 18.1% Maximum Green (s) 12.8 12.8 71.5 71.5 14.5 14.5 73.2 73.2 26.0 20.4 20.4 21.6 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max C-Max None None C-Max C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 11.8 75.2 75.2 14.5 77.9 77.9 24.1 17.4 17.4 20.9 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.08 0.50 0.50 0.10 0.52 0.52 0.16 0.12 0.12 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.87 0.27 0.79 0.71 0.36 0.88 0.64 0.64 0.87 Control Delay 77.7 40.2 4.6 83.4 31.2 6.9 90.5 76.7 38.0 81.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 77.7 40.2 4.6 83.4 31.2 6.9 90.5 76.7 38.0 81.5 LOS E D A F C A F E D F Approach Delay 39.0 34.1 70.9 Approach LOS D C E Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 45.0 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Cashmere Blvd & St. Lucie West Blvd 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 3

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Pre 3: Cashmere Blvd & St. Lucie West Blvd Timing Plan: PM Lane Group SBT SBR Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 21.5 21.5 Total Split (s) 21.5 21.5 Total Split (%) 14.3% 14.3% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 14.2 14.2 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.51 Control Delay 76.0 16.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 76.0 16.0 LOS E B Approach Delay 68.1 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 4

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Pre 6: Cashmere Blvd & Cashmere Corners Timing Plan: PM Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 35 4 19 52 6 32 33 334 34 65 364 16 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 350 250 260 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.874 0.875 0.850 0.994 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1628 0 1770 1630 0 1770 3539 1583 1770 3518 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1628 0 1770 1630 0 1770 3539 1583 1770 3518 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 631 689 581 580 Travel Time (s) 14.3 15.7 13.2 13.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 38 4 21 57 7 35 36 363 37 71 396 17 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 38 25 0 57 42 0 36 363 37 71 413 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 30 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.5% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 6

HCM 2010 TWSC 2014 Pre 6: Cashmere Blvd & Cashmere Corners Timing Plan: PM Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 35 4 19 52 6 32 33 334 34 65 364 16 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - 0 - - 350-250 260 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 38 4 21 57 7 35 36 363 37 71 396 17 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 803 981 207 776 989 182 413 0 0 363 0 0 Stage 1 546 546-435 435 - - - - - - - Stage 2 257 435-341 554 - - - - - - - Follow-up Headway 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 275 248 799 287 245 829 1142 - - 1192 - - Stage 1 490 516-570 579 - - - - - - - Stage 2 725 579-647 512 - - - - - - - Time blocked-platoon, % - - - - Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 242 226 799 258 223 829 1142 - - 1192 - - Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 349 326-369 326 - - - - - - - Stage 1 475 485-552 561 - - - - - - - Stage 2 665 561-587 482 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.1 13.9 0.7 1.2 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1142 - - 349 499 369 532 1192 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 - - 0.073 0.076 0.102 0.113 0.059 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.255 - - 16.1 12.8 15.9 12.6 8.21 - - HCM Lane LOS A C B C B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.097 - - 0.234 0.244 0.338 0.38 0.189 - - Notes ~ : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 7

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Post 3: Cashmere Blvd & St. Lucie West Blvd Timing Plan: PM Lane Group EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 13 143 1425 232 49 209 1207 308 245 144 158 390 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 370 370 780 0 370 0 365 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Ped Bike Factor 0.90 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3433 3539 1583 0 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3099 3539 1583 0 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 3433 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 220 247 98 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1048 957 580 Travel Time (s) 23.8 21.8 13.2 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 180 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 14 151 1500 244 52 220 1271 324 258 152 166 411 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 165 1500 244 0 272 1271 324 258 152 166 411 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment R NA Left Left Right R NA Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Median Width(ft) 30 30 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 9 9 15 9 15 9 15 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Left Left Thru Right Left Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 20 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 6 20 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 1

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Post 3: Cashmere Blvd & St. Lucie West Blvd Timing Plan: PM Lane Group SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 215 130 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 365 Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 137 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 1268 Travel Time (s) 28.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 226 137 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 226 137 Enter Blocked Intersection No No Lane Alignment Left Right Median Width(ft) 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 4 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 2

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Post 3: Cashmere Blvd & St. Lucie West Blvd Timing Plan: PM Lane Group EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Permitted Phases 2 6 8 Detector Phase 5 5 2 2 1 1 6 6 3 8 8 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 9.5 21.5 21.5 9.5 9.5 21.5 21.5 9.5 21.5 21.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 18.1 18.1 75.6 75.6 20.5 20.5 78.0 78.0 32.4 26.9 26.9 27.0 Total Split (%) 12.1% 12.1% 50.4% 50.4% 13.7% 13.7% 52.0% 52.0% 21.6% 17.9% 17.9% 18.0% Maximum Green (s) 12.6 12.6 70.1 70.1 15.0 15.0 72.5 72.5 26.9 21.4 21.4 21.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max C-Max None None C-Max C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 11.6 73.9 73.9 15.0 77.4 77.4 24.9 18.3 18.3 20.8 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.10 0.52 0.52 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.86 0.27 0.80 0.70 0.35 0.88 0.67 0.60 0.87 Control Delay 77.7 40.5 4.7 83.0 31.0 6.7 89.9 77.2 34.7 81.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 77.7 40.5 4.7 83.0 31.0 6.7 89.9 77.2 34.7 81.6 LOS E D A F C A F E C F Approach Delay 39.2 34.3 70.6 Approach LOS D C E Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 45.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Cashmere Blvd & St. Lucie West Blvd 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 3

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Post 3: Cashmere Blvd & St. Lucie West Blvd Timing Plan: PM Lane Group SBT SBR Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 21.5 21.5 Total Split (s) 21.5 21.5 Total Split (%) 14.3% 14.3% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 14.2 14.2 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.50 Control Delay 76.0 15.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 76.0 15.9 LOS E B Approach Delay 68.3 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 4

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2014 Post 6: Cashmere Blvd & Cashmere Corners Timing Plan: PM Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 35 4 19 77 6 32 33 355 39 96 364 16 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 350 250 260 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.874 0.875 0.850 0.994 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1628 0 1770 1630 0 1770 3539 1583 1770 3518 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1628 0 1770 1630 0 1770 3539 1583 1770 3518 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 631 689 581 580 Travel Time (s) 14.3 15.7 13.2 13.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 38 4 21 84 7 35 36 386 42 104 396 17 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 38 25 0 84 42 0 36 386 42 104 413 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 30 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.1% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service A 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 6

HCM 2010 TWSC 2014 Post 6: Cashmere Blvd & Cashmere Corners Timing Plan: PM Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 35 4 19 77 6 32 33 355 39 96 364 16 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - 0 - - 350-250 260 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 38 4 21 84 7 35 36 386 42 104 396 17 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 881 1071 207 867 1080 193 413 0 0 386 0 0 Stage 1 613 613-458 458 - - - - - - - Stage 2 268 458-409 622 - - - - - - - Follow-up Headway 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 241 219 799 247 217 816 1142 - - 1169 - - Stage 1 446 481-552 565 - - - - - - - Stage 2 714 565-590 477 - - - - - - - Time blocked-platoon, % - - - - Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 206 193 799 216 191 816 1142 - - 1169 - - Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 313 289-330 294 - - - - - - - Stage 1 432 438-535 547 - - - - - - - Stage 2 654 547-518 435 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.1 15.9 0.6 1.7 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1142 - - 313 463 330 463 1169 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 - - 0.081 0.081 0.169 0.149 0.089 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.255 - - 17.5 13.5 18.1 14.1 8.381 - - HCM Lane LOS A C B C B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.097 - - 0.263 0.264 0.6 0.522 0.293 - - Notes ~ : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined 12/4/2013 12:00 pm Synchro 8 Light Report Page 7