US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Similar documents
5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What IS BRT, Really? Not BRT and RNY

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Draft Results and Recommendations

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

1 On Time Performance

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Needs and Community Characteristics

Troost Corridor Transit Study

Draft Results and Open House

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Green Line Long-Term Investments

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project. Downtown Oakland to San Leandro International Blvd to East 14 th St

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

KANSAS CITY STREETCAR

Van Ness Transit Corridor Improvement Project. Engineering, Maintenance and Safety Committee March 25, 2015

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese CEO/General Manager

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Maryland Gets to Work

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

Proposed FY2015 Budget and Fare Increase

Capital Metro Plans & Projects Update NASWC July 27, capmetro.org

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

May 23, 2011 APTA Bus & Paratransit Conference. Metro ExpressLanes

Multnomah County Commission December 15, 2016

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

CHAIR AND MEMBERS STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING ON MARCH 20, 2019 RECOMMENDATION

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Keeping Seattle Moving Seattle City Council February 2013

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA) AND FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA)

Arterial BRT Quarterly Update

Dixie Transportation Planning Office

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Proposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

Yonge Subway Extension Breakfast Meeting

UNION STATION MASTER PLAN STUDY

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

Purple Line Light Rail P3 Project

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

BUS RAPID TRAN SIT. Institute of Tra nsporta tion Engineers October 17, 2013

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Arterial Bus Rapid Transit. System Policy Oversight Committee April 7, 2014

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report

Program Overview. February 2018

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

DART Priorities Overview

San Francisco Transportation Plan Update

GODURHAM PROGRESS REPORT

Informal Business Discussion Minutes Tuesday, May 3, :00 PM 1. Transportation

Exhibit A Sound Transit Board Resolution R Selecting the bicycle, pedestrian, and parking access improvements to be built for the Puyallup

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

Bus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL

Colorado Association of Ski Towns August 26, 2016

Transcription:

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing February 16, 2017

Project Goals Improve the quality of transit service Improve mobility opportunities and choices Enhance quality of life Support master planned development Provide sustainable and cost-effective transit alternatives 2

A Snapshot of the US 29 Corridor One of busiest transit corridor in Maryland with over 11,000 daily bus trips Bus trips on the corridor average 20 percent longer than auto trips; up to 60 percent longer during peak periods Highly diverse 65% of residents minority; 32% foreign born 31% of population speaks a language other than English at home 30% of households earn less than half of the area median income 12% have no access to a car; 38% have access to only one vehicle Home to over 9,000 senior citizens and 11,000 people with disabilities 3

A Snapshot of the US 29 Corridor Major job and education centers Food and Drug Administration (FDA) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Discovery Communications Headquarters 61,000 jobs along corridor in 2010; projected to over 80,000 in 2040 Major Planned Development White Oak Science Gateway Downtown Silver Spring Burtonsville 4

MDOT Study Process Findings (2040 Analysis) Station Locations Service Plans HOV mode share Impacts of new pavement in north Traffic Analysis Total capital cost : $80-140 million 5

MCDOT US 29 Project Approximately 40% of the alignment along US 29 is in dedicated Bus on Shoulder lanes 6

Elements of MCDOT US 29 Project Frequent all-day service 7 days/week Same hours as Metrorail 7.5 minutes peak; 15 minutes off-peak Uniquely branded vehicles and stations Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Bike/pedestrian improvements to facilitate station access, including 10 new bikeshare stations Ongoing coordination with Howard County 7

Elements of BRT BRT Element Runningway Stations Vehicles Fare Collection ITS (Technology) Service and Operations Branding US 29 BRT Details 40% in dedicated Bus on Shoulder 11 level-boarding BRT stations with improved amenities such as real-time info and off-board fare collection Sleek, articulated BRT vehicles with multiple-door level boarding and interior bike accommodation Off-board fare collection Transit Signal Priority at 15 intersections; real-time arrival info Frequent, headway-based service with longer span; integration with local services Uniquely branded service, stations, vehicles Most BRT projects operate in mixed traffic primarily arterials streets for 50 percent or more of their routes. - GAO Report, 2012 Source: National BRT Institute 8

US 29 BRT Project Benefits Ridership and Transit Reliability Projected BRT Ridership 2020: 13,000 daily boardings (3,950 new) 2040: 20,000 daily boardings (5,700 new) Improved transit reliability Current on time performance for local corridor transit services averages 45-77%* US 29 BRT will improve reliability through: Bus on Shoulder Transit Signal Priority The Benefit-Cost Analysis for the US 29 BRT project shows that benefits outweigh costs by a factor of four. More efficient operations (level multiple-door vehicle boarding, limited stops, off-board fare collection) 9 *RideOn goal is 90%

US 29 BRT Compared to Other BRTs Ridership Average Daily Ridership One Year After Opening US 29 BRT 10 Source: GAO Analysis of Transit Agency Reported Data, 2012

US 29 BRT Project Benefits Improved Transit Travel Time 11

US 29 BRT Compared to Other BRTs Travel Time Savings Change in travel time (as a percentage) over previous bus service US 29 BRT (White Oak to Silver Spring) 12 Source: GAO Analysis of Transit Agency Reported Data, 2012

US 29 BRT Project Benefits Economic Impact Development of the White Oak Science Gateway depends heavily upon the presence of US 29 BRT and its capacity to enhance mobility. 7 million square feet of commercial space > 20,000 jobs 5,300 additional dwelling units Project estimated to result in $269-520 million net benefit Estimated Operational Phase Impacts 85 permanent jobs in Montgomery County $6.5 million annual labor income $13.4 million additional annual business sales Source: MCDOT TIGER grant application, Economic Impact Analysis, Sage Policy Group 13

US 29 BRT Project Benefits Accessibility Increases regional connections and access to a fast-growing jobs corridor US 29 BRT will improve transit access and provide upward mobility for transit-dependent populations Currently minimal off-peak transit service on the corridor BRT will significantly increase span and frequency of service Local routes will be integrated and improved 14

US 29 BRT Project Benefits Route Efficiency and Coverage Existing local service will be evaluated to interface with BRT and potentially provide improved frequency and/or coverage into neighborhoods Potential strategies: Adjust frequency Adjust span of service Relocate stops Change alignments Extend routes Limited stop overlay Neighborhood circulators 15

US 29 BRT Estimated Infrastructure Cost MCDOT anticipates that the majority of TIGER funding will be used towards station and pedestrian improvement construction 16 Note: County s FY17-22 budget already included $6.5 million for US 29 BRT planning and design

TIGER Grant USDOT Program Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery $500 million made available nationwide in FY16 Highly competitive (3-5% of grant requests awarded) $10 million Federal grant awarded for US 29 BRT Award based on demonstrated benefits of project with respect to grant criteria (economic competitiveness, quality of life, environmental sustainability) Tremendous opportunity for federal investment in East County Provides national visibility to Montgomery County s BRT program 17

Status of TIGER grant Developing positive relationship with FTA Grant agreement by June 2017 Elements required to secure grant Final scope of work (in progress) Inclusion of project in STIP/CLRP (March 2017) All local funding approved in CIP (May 2017) NEPA complete (June 2017) 18

US 29 Project Schedule 19

Public Engagement Developing robust public engagement plan Corridor Advisory Committees CACs will continue to meet to provide input on the project throughout project phases Public Open Houses Tuesday, March 7 Monday, March 13 6:30-8:30pm Silver Spring Civic Center 7:00-9:00pm Montgomery Blair High School 20 Wednesday, March 15 6:30-8:30pm White Oak Community Center