Mars 2018 Mission Status and Sample Acquisition Issues

Similar documents
From MARS To MOON. V. Giorgio Director of Italian Programs. Sorrento, October, All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space

Long-Range Rovers for Mars Exploration and Sample Return

NEXT Exploration Science and Technology Mission. Relevance for Lunar Exploration

Challenges of Designing the MarsNEXT Network

Moon Exploration Lunar Polar Sample Return ESA Thematic information day BELSPO, 3 July 2012

Lunar Architecture and LRO

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION LAVOCHKIN ASSOCIATION PROGRAM OF THE MOON EXPLORATION BY AUTOMATIC SPACE COMPLEXES

Sample Fetching Rover - Lightweight Rover Concepts for Mars Sample Return

CHANGING ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING PARADIGMS FOR HUMAN MARS LANDER

Europa Lander. Mission Concept Update 3/29/2017

Martian In Situ Investigations

Mission Concept Study

How to Assess Heritage Systems in the Early Phases? Andreas M. Hein

Heat Shield Design Project

Photovoltaic Assemblies For The Power Generation Of The Exomars Missions

European Lunar Lander: System Engineering Approach

System Testing by Flight Operators the Rosetta Experience

Europa Lander Mission Overview and Update

Mission Concept Study

ReachMars 2024 A Candidate Large-Scale Technology Demonstration Mission as a Precursor to Human Mars Exploration

Formation Flying Experiments on the Orion-Emerald Mission. Introduction

Mars Sample Return Implementation Discussions

On the feasibility of a fast track return to Mars

Planetary Surface Transportation and Site Development

NASA Glenn Research Center Intelligent Power System Control Development for Deep Space Exploration

Rover development status

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

Historical Perspectives: Evolution of Recent Mars EDL Systems Development. 6th International Planetary Probe Workshop June 2008 Erisa K Hines

MARS-OZ: A Design for a Simulated Mars Base in the Arkaroola Region

Name: Space Exploration PBL

Lunar Missions by Year - All Countries. Mission count dropped as we transitioned from politically driven missions to science driven missions

Lunette: A Global Network of Small Lunar Landers

Chassis Concepts for the ExoMars Rover

Solar Electric Propulsion Benefits for NASA and On-Orbit Satellite Servicing

The Common Spacecraft Bus and Lunar Commercialization

Statement of Jim Schoppenhorst, Director, DD(X) BAE Systems / Armament Systems Division. Before the

Human Exploration of the Lunar Surface

AFG Project Update Spring 2006 Semester 02/15/2006

Massachusetts Space Grant Consortium

An Overview of CSA s s Space Robotics Activities

Prototype Development of a Solid Propellant Rocket Motor and an Electronic Safing and Arming Device for Nanosatellite (NANOSAT) Missions

Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati

The Falcon 1 Flight 3 - Jumpstart Mission Integration Summary and Flight Results. AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, 2008 Paper SSC08-IX-6

Venus Entry Options Venus Upper Atmosphere Investigations Science and Technical Interchange Meeting (STIM)

Analysis of Power Storage Media for the Exploration of the Moon

QinetiQ Electric Propulsion

The Mars Express Mission A Continuing Challenge. Erhard Rabenau, NOVA Space Associates Ltd Mars Express Senior Mission Planner

Next Steps in Human Exploration: Cislunar Systems and Architectures

F/A-18A/B/C/D Flight Control Computer Software Upgrade

An Integrated Process for FDIR Design in Aerospace

Cooperative EVA/Telerobotic Surface Operations in Support of Exploration Science

Curiosity lands on Mars

AMSAT-NA FOX Satellite Program

Ares V: Supporting Space Exploration from LEO to Beyond

Routine Scheduled Space Access For Secondary Payloads

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6416) City Council Staff Report

Design and Testing of a Sample Container to Preserve Rock Cores for Proposed Mars Sample Return

Ironless Core DC Motors for Aerospace

Innovative Mars exploration rover using inflatable or unfolding wheels

OMOTENASHI. (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor)

AMBR* Engine for Science Missions

Lunar Surface Access from Earth-Moon L1/L2 A novel lander design and study of alternative solutions

Update on Community or Heritage Rail Project (Project Manager Services) The Engineering Department recommends that Council:

The European Lunar Lander Mission


CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Mars Surface Mobility Proposal

Exomars Orbiter Module Bus OMB

CALL FOR IDEAS FOR THE RE-USE OF THE MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM PLATFORM CAPABILITIES. D. McCoy

LPT6510 Pulse-tube Cooler for K applications

Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)

RIMRES: A project summary

Smart Grid Update Supplier Conference. Kevin Dasso Senior Director Technology & Information Strategy. October 27, 2011

THE MARS EXPLORATION ROVERS: HITTING THE ROAD ON MARS. Nagin Cox

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry

A combined Exobiology and Geophysics Mission to Mars

Lunar Science and Infrastructure with the Future Lunar Lander

Adrestia. A mission for humanity, designed in Delft. Challenge the future

Development of Japan s Next Flagship Launch Vehicle

UN-ECE / WP.29-AC3 HFCV - SGS. Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs

SABRE FOR HYPERSONIC & SPACE ACCESS PLATFORMS

Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)

PRESENTATION TO THE OPAG PRODUCTION OPERATIONS AND RPS SYSTEMS STATUS

Utilizing Lunar Architecture Transportation Elements for Mars Exploration

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program. Advisory Committee Meeting

EUROBOT EVA-assistant robot for ISS

ENERGIA 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : K Series : K-1/SL-17 Version : 4 strap-ons

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release.

Applying Environment & Sustainability to Airport Charges. Matt Gorman, Rick Norman

SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM. Steve Creech Manager Spacecraft/Payload Integration & Evolution August 29, 2017 A NEW CAPABILITY FOR DISCOVERY

lights on, down 2 ½ 40 feet, down 2 ½ Kickin up some dust 30 feet, 2 ½ down faint shadow

BATTERY FOR EXTENDED TEMPERATURE RANGE EXOMARS ROVER MISSION

Light-Lift Rocket II

Autonomous Sample Acquisition for the ExoMars Rover

Deployment and Drop Test for Inflatable Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Capsule with using Large Scientific Balloon

Suborbital Flight Opportunities for Cubesat-Class Experiments Aboard NLV Test Flights

Establishment of Light Tactical Vehicles Program Office

July 28, ULA Rideshare Capabilities

EXOMARS MSA. TEST HDRM DEVELOPMENT FOR SEPARATION PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION

Transcription:

Mars 2018 Mission Status and Sample Acquisition Issues Presentation to the Planetary Protection Subcommittee Charles Whetsel Manager, Advanced Studies and Program Architecture Office Christopher G. Salvo Mars 2018 Formulation Lead January 20, 2011

Project Context Mars 2018 is 2 nd mission of new NASA-ESA Joint Mars Exploration Program ESA to provide orbiter engineering bus for Joint Trace Gas Science Payload & ESA Entry, Descent, & Landing (EDL) Demonstration carrier in 2016 NASA to provide launch/cruise/edl for both NASA & ESA Rovers in 2018 Current concept would make extensive use of MSL-heritage Launch, Cruise, and EDL systems NASA provides launch for both missions Note 1: Primary division of responsibilities established June 2009 at NASA-ESA Bilateral discussions in Plymouth, UK. Responsibilities for subsequent missions in the joint program are yet to be determined, but both agencies agree on the ultimate importance of Mars Sample Return (MSR) NASA Mars 2018 Project is currently in Pre-Phase A Working towards conduct of Mission Concept Review & issuance of Formulation Authorization Document, in conjunction with Key Decision Point A (KDP-A) later in 2011 or early 2012 (pending funding/progress) Note 2: ESA Rover has been under development for > 4 years. The ESA ExoMars Project considers the rover maturity to be at Preliminary Design Review (PDR) (Phase B->C transition) level Mars 2018-2

Excerpt of Working-version NASA Program-Level Requirements (of relevant interest) Launch to Mars in 2018 opportunity Deliver to Mars the proposed NASA 2018 Rover Deliver to Mars the ESA ExoMars Rover Be capable of landing/operating at sites as far north as [25 N] and as far south as [5 S] latitude. 5 S adopted from ExoMars rover constraint. For NASA rover 15 S is roughly equivalent to 25 N. Go to a site such that regions of scientific interest would be reachable within traverse capabilities of the rovers i.e. land at sites similar to Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) sites EDL capable of handling similar rocks and slopes - to put science targets within reach. NOTE: Flight system implementation assumes large inheritance of MSL hardware systems for all elements prior to touchdown see following NASA Rover would be able to select, acquire, and cache [1 or 2] caches of at least [19-31] cores of [10 g] each, [TBD number potentially hermetically sealed] NOTE, this may not be the full returned sample mass; regolith/dust/compressed atmospheric sample may be acquired by subsequent MSR-L. If two caches flown, may be duplicates of each other; for robustness against failures in later campaign steps (fill either in parallel [identical contents] or serially [early mission cache, later mission cache] Mars 2018-3

Flight System Concept: 2-Rover Touchdown Platform Delivered by MSL-based Cruise/Entry/Descent Stage Touchdown Through Initial Deployments Sky Crane Maneuver Stand-Up Egress Mars 2018-4

Planetary Protection (PP) and Contamination Control Expectations Joint mission moving forward assuming eventual overall Planetary Protection Categorization would be V (Restricted Earth Return Outbound Phase/Leg) driven by NASA mission objectives, recognizing that ESA ExoMars objectives, taken alone, likely warrant Category IVb (Investigations of extant Life) Overall Planetary Protection and Organic Cleanliness Considerations are expected to be a major factor in the design and implementation processes for both rovers as well as the common shared delivery system hardware (largely inherited from MSL-based designs) Mars 2018-5

Current Thinking Regarding PP Approach Considering 4 Main Classes of PP-Related Concerns: 1. Traditional Forward PP (contamination of the martian landing site, and its potential for propagation to the rest of Mars) MSL-based approach expected: Similar mass delivered to Mars surface, but likely larger surface area for 2-rovers + platform 2. Protection from contamination of samples delivered to the in situ experiments on the ExoMars rover (general rover environment on Mars, internal sample acquisition/transfer pathways) 3. Protection from contamination of samples for return delivered to the NASA rover caching assembly (general rover environment on Mars, internal sample acquisition/transfer pathways) Planned approach is for each rover (ESA/NASA) to take appropriate precautions to safeguard the sample acquisition/delivery pathways, and deliver clean rovers to the integration flow; NASA to lead development of approach to maintain cleanliness during ground handling and in flight through touchdown/egress on Mars. 4. Satisfaction of anticipated specific Back-PP requirements on containment assurance of martian material returned to the earth s biosphere Currently assumed to be primarily met by systems/hardware on later elements of a Mars Sample Return (MSR) Campaign, e.g. Earth Entry Vehicle, Orbiter, or OS. Due-diligence to examine potential design implications for 2018 CGS - 6

Sample Acquisition and Caching Architecture Tool Deployment Device: Design: 5 degree of freedom (DoF) arm Functions: tool deployment, alignment and linear feed; place canister on the ground. Coring Tool: Technique: Rotary percussion; Functions: Core, breakoff, retention, bit change out, linear spring for preload and vibration isolation. Caching Subsystem: Sample Encapsulation: Acquire sample directly into its sample tube in the bit. Sample Transfer: Use bit changeout to transfer sample to caching subsystem (sample in tube in bit). Functions: Transfer sample tube in/out of bit, bit changeout, tube sealing, store tubes in canister. 12/1/2010 MLS- 7

Prototype Caching Subsystem Development Concept Docking port Bit 2- DoF handling arm Sample measurement, sealing sta=on Plugs Sample canister Linear actuator, tube gripper Sample tubes Spare tubes Sample carousel 3/4/2010 iphone for scale Sample tube Bit carousel SHEC Func/onal Prototype PGB, 8

Mars 2018 Formulation Status (2 of 2) Integrated timeline of pre-launch flight hardware flow, handling activities/events and facilities still in development, so inputs related to contamination threat and assay/re-cleaning opportunities are timely (a planned agenda topic at next face-toface interchange planned week of February 7 th ) NASA 2018 Formulation activities anticipate substantial R&D/ Technology Development efforts in 2012/2013 (in preparation for 2014 Project-level PDR), focused not only on Sample Acquisition/Encapsulation but also PP/Organic Cleanliness Techniques and Approaches to assure system compliance with requirements, including MSR round-trip considerations Planning and scoping for these efforts getting underway in 2011 Mars 2018-9

Additional Slides BACKUP MATERIAL Mars 2018-10

Full Spacecraft Expanded View Mars 2018-11

NASA Rover Dimensions 1791 mm 739 mm 1729 mm 443 mm 1947 mm 1977 mm 5518 mm 1850 mm Mars 2018-12

ESA ExoMars Rover Stowed Deployed 660 mm 1500 mm 1410 mm Mars 2018-13

Current Working Mars 2018 Schedule (based on 2010 PPBE budget request) Full Lifecycle, Phase A-D: 78 months Note: Post-design review separation From KDP milestones subject to revision Mars 2018-14

Current Working Mars 2018 Schedule (based on 2010 PPBE budget request) Full Lifecycle, Phase A-D: 78 months Note: Post-design review separation From KDP milestones subject to revision Mars 2018-15

Sample Tube Ø11.9 mm tube OD Ø11.2 mm tube ID Ø10 mm core 6 mm plug 5 mm gap 68 mm tube Ø13 mm chamber ID January, 2011 50 mm core 69 mm chamber 7 mm gripping feature From P. Younse 16