Neighborhood Traffic Calming Options

Similar documents
TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy

CAR 10-1 TRAFFIC CALMING CAR 10-1 OPR: Engineering 06/06

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

SPEED HUMP POLICY. It is the policy of Hamilton Township to consider requests for speed humps as outlined below:

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Citizens Committee for Facilities

Speed Limit Reduction. January 24, 2017

traversing them. Speed dips may be installed in lieu of speed humps where the 85 th percentile speed on a street is at least 36 mph.

SPEED HUMP POLICY and PROCEDURES for RESIDENTIAL AREAS

Low Speed Design Criteria for Residential Streets Andrew J. Ballard, P.E. and David M. Haldeman, E.I.T.

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

County of Humboldt Department of Public Works COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SPEED HUMP POLICY

REAL-TIME ELECTRONIC SPEED FEEDBACK DISPLAYS EVALUATION:

POLICY ON SPEED HUMPS

TRAFFIC IMPACT DATA. Dillons #98 On-Site Relocation

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Memorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017

Slow Down! Why speed is important in realizing your Vision Zero goals and how to achieve the speeds you need

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Palo Alto Evergreen Park Mayfield Residential Preferential Parking (RPP) Program. How to Purchase Resident Parking Permits RESIDENTS

Clearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

SUSTAINABLE STREETS DIVISION DIRECTIVE ORDER #6010

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY. Order # 6019 FOR PUBLIC HEARING

Purple Line Extension, Section 2 Southern California Edison, Phase I

Wichita TMC Support- Monthly Incident Report for December 2017

Public Meeting: Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) TNC (Transportation Network Company) Lot on S. Eads Street

POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION. Effective Date: July 10, 2013

Purple Line Extension, Section 2 Southern California Edison, Phase I June 7, 2017

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

Additional $200 Speeding Fine Signs

Traffic Calming Study. Town of Avon, Indiana. July 2017

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

City of Lawrence Traffic Safety Commission Agenda June 1, :00 PM City Commission Room, City Hall

WIM #31 US 2, MP 8.0 EAST GRAND FORKS, MN JANUARY 2015 MONTHLY REPORT

County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

POLICIES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPEED HUMPS (Amended May 23, 2011)

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

Traffic Data Services: reporting and data analytics using cellular data

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

Purpose of Tonight s Meeting

We recommend you keep a copy of this ordinance with you while you are off-roading.

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

2016 Congestion Report

CUY SAFETY STUDY KINSMAN RD (US 422) AT E. 93 RD ST CLEVELAND, OHIO - ODOT DISTRICT 12. October 13, LJB Inc.

WIM #40 US 52, MP S. ST. PAUL, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT

Wichita TMC Support- Monthly Incident Report for June 2018

APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

2015 Community Report White Rock

Project Advisory Committee

Residential Parking Management Plan. Appendix A CITYWIDE PARKING RATES

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT

Collision Analysis Safety Tables

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

2016 Community Report Portales

WIM #39 MN 43, MP 45.2 WINONA, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT

Mountain Area Transportation Study Model Methodology and Assumptions Final

2015 Community Report Grants

Exposition Light Rail Transit Project

2016 Community Report Los Alamos County

2014 Community Report Portales

a. A written request for speed humps must be submitted by residents living along the applicable street(s) to the Public Works Department.

2015 Community Report Las Vegas

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

2015 Community Report Tularosa

2014 Community Report Luna County

2016 Community Report Torrance County

2015 Community Report Torrance County

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

and Members of Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Mewburn Road Speed Control Review

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

2016 Community Report De Baca County

2015 Community Report Chaparral

2016 Community Report Aztec

2015 Community Report Aztec

TAP PHASE 3.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT) Intersection Concept, Case Studies, and Design Guide ITE Midwest Annual Meeting June 30, 2015 Branson, MO

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description C Existing 100 Block Michigan Avenue Northeast Westbound

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA MAY 2013 MONTHLY REPORT

2014 Community Report Las Vegas

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

2014 Community Report Truth or Consequences

Transcription:

2017 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Options F.Q. Story Neighborhood Carl Langford Traffic Engineering Supervisor City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department Traffic Services 1 Division

Meeting Agenda Current traffic conditions Neighborhood streets Crash history Traffic Volume/Speed Results Traffic calming programs Speed Hump/Speed Cushion Neighborhood Traffic Management Arizona State Fair Parking 2

Neighborhood Streets Arterial Street Collector Street Local Street Existing STOP Sign 35mph+ 35mph 25mph 25mph 3

Crash History 2011-2015 16 SINGLE VEHICLE 12 ANGLE 5 SIDESWIPE 4 REAR END 2 LEFT TURN 2 BIKE Crash Statistics 41 Reported Crashes 8 Crashes / Year Severity: 1 Serious Injury 2 Minor Injury 6 Possible Injury 32 No Injury Citywide: 24,131 Crashes/yr 4

Traffic Count Results (West) April 2017 176 VPD 61 NB / 115 SB 114 VPD 47 EB/ 67 WB 166 VPD 61 EB/ 105 WB 281 VPD 66 EB/ 215 WB 248 VPD 71 EB/ 177 WB 62 VPD 28 NB / 34 SB 694 VPD 203 NB / 491 SB Traffic Volume VPD = Vehicles Per day 191 VPD 77 EB/ 114 WB 188 VPD 80 EB/ 108 WB 211 VPD 94 EB/ 117 WB 5

Traffic Count Results (West) April 2017 19.5 MPH 18.1 NB / 20.8 SB 14.8 MPH 14.3 EB/ 15.3 WB 17.3 MPH 16.0 EB/ 18.6 WB 17.4 MPH 15.5 EB/ 19.2 WB 17.8 MPH 14.9 EB/ 20.7 WB 17.1 MPH 15.7 NB / 18.5 SB 25.2 MPH 25.2 NB / 25.2 SB Average Speed MPH = Miles Per Hour 18.0 MPH 16.8 EB/ 19.2 WB 17.7 MPH 17.0 EB/18.4 WB 18.8 MPH 18.7 EB/ 18.9 WB 6

Traffic Count Results (West) April 2017 1.4% 0.8% NB /1.9% SB 0.3% 0.5% EB/0.0% WB 0.4% 0.0% EB/ 0.7% WB 0.0% 0.0% EB/ 0.0% WB 0.3% 0.0% EB/ 0.5% WB 0.4% 0.0% NB/0.7% SB 2.9% 3.1 NB / 2.6 SB Percentage of Speeders 10+ MPH Over Limit 0.1% 0.0% EB/ 0.2% WB 1.0% 0.3% EB/1.6% WB 1.2% 1.0% EB/1.3% WB 7

Traffic Count Results (East) April 2017 360 VPD 194 NB / 166 SB 443 VPD 223 NB / 220 SB 637 VPD 406 EB/ 231 WB 372 VPD 162 EB/ 210 WB 814 VPD 283 EB/ 531 WB 343 VPD 228 EB/ 115 WB 268 VPD 141 NB / 127 SB Traffic Volume VPD = Vehicles Per day 236 VPD 111 EB/ 125 WB 220 VPD 108 EB/ 112 WB 171 VPD 82 EB/ 89 WB 8

Traffic Count Results (East) April 2017 18.1 MPH 17.8 NB / 18.3 SB 19.6 MPH 19.6 NB / 19.6 SB 21.9 MPH 21.3 EB/ 22.5 WB 21.9 MPH 21.3 EB/ 22.5 WB 21.9 MPH 21.8 EB/ 21.9 WB 20.6 MPH 22.3 EB/ 18.8 WB 19.6 MPH 20.1 NB / 19.0 SB Average Speed MPH = Miles Per Hour 23.9 MPH 23.9 EB/ 23.8 WB 19.4 MPH 19.9 EB/ 18.9 WB 19.4 MPH 19.6 EB/ 19.2 WB 9

Traffic Count Results (East) April 2017 0.2% 0.0% NB /0.4% SB 0.1% 0.0% NB /0.1% SB 1.1% 0.6% EB/1.6% WB 1.3% 0.6% EB/ 1.9% WB 1.0% 0.8% EB/1.1% WB 1.0% 1.2% EB/0.8% WB 0.7% 1.2% NB /0.2% SB Percentage of Speeders 10+ MPH Over Limit 4.5% 5.3% EB/3.7% WB 0.6% 0.4% EB/0.7% WB 0.6% 0.6% EB/0.6% WB 10

Historical Traffic Study Results 2016 445 VPD 241 EB/ 204 WB Traffic Volume VPD (Vehicles Per Day) 309 VPD 212 EB/ 97 WB 209 VPD 79 NB / 130 SB 294 VPD 154 NB / 140 SB 209 VPD 79 NB / 130 SB 11

Historical Traffic Study Results 2016 22.5 MPH 22.9 EB/ 22.5 WB Average Speed MPH (Miles Per Hour) 21.3 MPH 22.3 EB/ 20.2 WB 19.3 MPH 19.6 NB / 19.0 SB 19.8 MPH 19.4 NB / 20.1 SB 19.3 MPH 19.6 NB / 19.0 SB 12

Historical Traffic Study Results 2016 0.7% 0.4 EB/ 1.0 WB 10 MPH Over Limit Percentage of Total 0.7% 1.4 EB/ 0.0 WB 0.0% 0.0% NB / 0.0% SB 0.0% 0.0% NB / 0.0% SB 0.0% 0.0% NB / 0.0% SB 13

Traffic Volume Results April 2017 Highest Volume Day Locations Friday 467 (52%) Vehicles/ WB Friday 925 (45%) Vehicles/SB 14 Daily Breakdowns (Average percentage of total Volume) Friday 33% Saturday 21% Sunday 18% Monday 28%

15 Stop Signs Stop signs are traffic control devices, not traffic calming devices Signs are justified when: Visibility obstructions exist Crash problems exist Traffic volumes are equal Improper use of stop sign can make intersections more dangerous

16 Speed Humps Speed Humps: Run continuously across street Local streets only Slows all vehicles

17 Speed Cushions Speed Cushions: Runs continuously with grooves cut for fire trucks Collector streets only Slow all vehicles except fire trucks

Speed Bump or Hump? Speed Bump Speed Hump 3 ½ 12-0 Bumps are used primarily in parking lots with LOW speeds 18 18

Speed Hump Program Requirements Costs Speed humps cost the City $2,800 each Residents may need to pay for some of installation Average Speed on Street Cost to Resident for Speed Humps 25 mph or Less $1,200/hump 26-29 mph $250/hump 30 mph or higher $100/hump Once installed City will maintain 19

Speed Cushion Program Requirements Costs Speed Cushions cost the City $4,000 each Residents may need to pay for some or all of installation Average Speed on Street Speed Limit or Less Cost to Resident for Speed Cushions $2,800/cushion 1 to 4 mph Above Limit $500/cushion 5 mph or more Above Limit $200/cushion Once installed City will maintain 20

21 Petitioning Requirements Petition boundary: Speed Humps 20-30 homes Speed Cushions 50-60 homes Consensus: Super Majority Approval: 100% within 100 feet 70% of entire boundary

Traffic Mitigation Eligibility Existing Speed Humps

23 Traffic Calming Program o Contact from Neighborhood o Create Neighborhood Traffic Committee o Conduct traffic study - Speed and Volume o Devise Traffic Control Plan o Obtain Neighborhood Consensus o Implement Solutions

24 Create Traffic Committee Responsibility Where to count, What devices, Petition responsibilities

State Fair Parking

State Fair Parking

27 Arizona State Fair Parking Options Resident Permit Parking (RPP) Re-zoning of the street; only residents with a city-issued permit are allowed to park on the street. 24/7 coverage through the zone annually. Requires a study of intruder parking. Temporary No Parking Installation Applies to residents and non-residents. Temporary No Parking signs installed along the street. 24/7 coverage during the fair only. No Parking Time of Day Installation Applies to residents and non-residents. No Parking time of day signs installed along the street. Covers problematic times annually.

28 Questions? City Contacts: Carl Langford 602-262-4613 Carl.Langford@phoenix.gov Michael Vellotti 602-495-5463 Michael.Vellotti@phoenix.gov Traffic Complaint Hotline: 602-534-SPEED (7733)