Base Stock Slate Definition Progress Review

Similar documents
E.1.1 INTRODUCTION E.1.2 DEFINITIONS. The definitions in E through E apply to these Guidelines.

Lubricants Group Ballot Modifications to the API 10% Rule

API Service Category SN. Comparative Review API SN and ILSAC GF-5 Revisions Based on January 8 Ballot Comments March 19, 2010

On Nov. 14, 2018 the Lubricants Standards Group (LSG) reviewed the BOI/VGRA Task Force Proposal #2 VGRA Technical Principles.

Table F-x Technical Principles for New Viscosity Grades and Read Across. (Applies to oils with HTHS mpa s)

API Engine Oil Licensing and Certification System (EOLCS) Licensees API Lubricants Group Other Interested Parties

SJ, SL 7.4 min 7.4 min 8.6 min 7.4 min. R&R None

After review and discussion, the LSG agreed by voice vote to Ballot Table F-y Technical Principles for New Viscosity Grades and Read Across.

Ballot API 1509, Annex G Phosphorus Limits for Universal Oil. Instructions

CODE BULLETIN C-60. American Chemistry Council Product Approval Code of Practice January 2018 Edition

ILSAC GF-5 STANDARD FOR PASSENGER CAR ENGINE OILS. January 23, Jointly developed and approved by

INTERNATIONAL LUBRICANT STANDARDIZATION

API Engine Oil Licensing and Certification System (EOLCS) Licensees API Lubricants Group Other Interested Parties

API Lubricants Group Ballot Proposed Revisions to API 1509, 16th Edition, April 2007

API Engine Oil Program. Kevin Ferrick Sr. Manager, API Global Industry Services April 2016

Neutral Oils : 60R, 110RVL, 100R, 150R, 220R, 600R

On February 13, 2018 the Lubricants Standards Group (LSG) reviewed the BOI/VGRA Task Force Proposal #1 Sequence VH BOI Read Table Proposal.

Group III Base Stock Technology and Performance

Lubricants Group eballot on Revised Seq. IIIH to Seq. IIIG Equivalency in ILSAC GF-5

API Update. Kevin Ferrick 40 th Automotive Petroleum Industry Forum

Ballot Summary and Comments on Revision of API 1509 BOI/VGRA

PC-10 New Category Evaluation Team. Status Report

Re-refined Oil Definition Review Proposed Revision. California Assembly Bill 1195 (AB1195)

ATIEL TRAINING WEBINAR: WHAT S NEW IN 2017? Thursday 30 March 2017 (17.30 CET) Duration: max 1 hour WELCOME. Slide 1 of 26

Addressing the API Licensing Fear Factor

API Engine Oil Licensing and Certification System. API Lubricants Group November 2012

Lubricants Group eballot on Seq. IIIHB to Seq. IIIGB Equivalency in ILSAC GF-5

API Engine Oil Classifications Service fill oils for gasoline, light-duty diesel and heavy-duty diesel engines

Lubricants Group eballot on Seq. IIIH to Seq. IIIG Equivalency in ILSAC GF-5

API Engine Oil Classifications

API Lubricants Group - Standards Minutes of Teleconference 10-JAN-2013

Ballot Table F-** Groups II, III and IV Viscosity Read-Across: LSPI Test (ASTM Dxxxx )

LOW TEMPERATURE OPERABILITY STARTABILITY & CHARACTERISTICS

Q.6 ILSAC GF-6A/GF-6B Standard for Passenger Car Engine Oils (Effective May 1, 2020)

Engine oil specifications

Table G-6 Requirements for API Service Category SP and API SP with Resource Conserving None

Ballot Change to API 1509 Annex Q Addition of SAE 0W 16 & 5W 16 Engine Oils. April 17, 2014

MTEP Methods for Rated Parameters

Q.6 ILSAC GF-6A/GF-6B Standard for Passenger Car Engine Oils (Effective May 1, 2020)

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Update on the proposal for "A transparent and reliable hull and propeller performance standard"

Ballot Summary and Comments on Revision of API 1509 BOI/VGRA

1 COPYRIGHT 2018, LUBES N GREASES MAGAZINE. REPRODUCED WITH PERMISSION FROM THE MAY 2018 ISSUE

GLOBAL REGISTRY. Addendum. Global technical regulation No. 10 OFF-CYCLE EMISSIONS (OCE) Appendix

Refining impact of the IMO bunker fuel sulphur decision

WET GRIP TEST METHOD IMPROVEMENT for Passenger Car Tyres (C1) Overview of Tyre Industry / ISO activities. Ottawa

POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RESPONSE. Application of more than one engine operational profile ("multi-map") under the NOx Technical Code 2008

Premium Protection for Today s Engines EXTRA PROTECTION AND VALUE. PROTECK TM ELITE K SYNTHETIC BLEND ENGINE OIL

SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Fourteenth session Bonn, July 2001 Item 3 (b) of the provisional agenda

The revised FPR Commentary proposal is attached as Exhibit A.

Economic and Social Council

API CF & CG-4 Licensing

MEMORANDUM. Proposed Town of Chapel Hill Green Fleets Policy

RESPONSE TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT AND DRIVER AND VEHICLE STANDARDS AGENCY S CONSULTATION PAPER

Used Oil Aeration Control for GF-5

UOP/EMRE Alliance for High Quality Lube and Diesel Production Technology

SN GF min 7.7 min 8.6 min 7.6 min R&R None Ford

USING ENGINE OIL TO IMPROVE FUEL ECONOMY

Notification of a Proposal to issue a Certification Memorandum. Approved Model List Changes

ANNEX 7. RESOLUTION MEPC.182(59) Adopted on 17 July 2009

Session Four Applying functional safety to machine interlock guards

Renewable Fuels Association One Massachusetts Ave. NW Suite 820 Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Fax: (202)

Definition of White Spirits Under RAC Evaluation Based on New Identification Developed for REACH

Duncan Connolly. Basestocks & Specialties Marketing Development Manager ExxonMobil Fuels, Lubricants & Specialties Marketing Company

QUESTION / CLARIFICATION QC-ENE-001

Refill Capacities and Recommendations

13 th Military Airworthiness Conference 25 th September 2013 EASA Presentation. Pascal Medal Head Of Certification Experts Department EASA

TECHNICAL BULLETIN API LICENSING. THE API LICENSING PROCESS AND HOW AND WHY ENGINE OIL STANDARDS ARE DEVELOPED

OFFICIAL IPCO Policy Document

Neville Hargreaves Gastech, April 2017, Tokyo. Roll out of smaller scale GTL technology at ENVIA Energy s plant in Oklahoma City, USA

Standard Specification for Performance of Engine Oils 1

Revision of Directive 2000/59/EC on port reception facilities for ship generated waste and cargo residues

Joint Operating Procedures for First Nations Consultation on Energy Resource Activities

Guidance on Manufacturing Process Descriptions & Use of EINECS/CAS Number Definitions for REACH Registrations

Mobil Delvac 1300 Super

Petroleum Refining-Production Planning, Scheduling and Yield Optimization

Southern California Edison Rule 21 Storage Charging Interconnection Load Process Guide. Version 1.1

-SQA-SCOTTISH QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY HIGHER NATIONAL UNIT SPECIFICATION GENERAL INFORMATION

Fig 1. API Classification of base oils

API SP and API SP with Resource Conserving User Language

MorGas PRODUCTCATALOG 2013

Attached are suggested wording revisions to the proposed NASAA FPR Commentary.

FURTHER TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR ENHANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING

VHVI BASE OILS FROM FUELS HYDROCRACKER BOTTOMS

EITF Issue 15-A, Application of the Normal Purchases and Normal Sales Scope Exception to Certain Electricity Contracts within Nodal Energy Markets

Understanding a FMCSA Compliance Investigation Presented by Chad Hoppenjan April 2015

Standard Authorization Request Form Regional Standard or Variance Texas Reliability Entity, Inc.

Methodology Validation Report for United Technologies Corporation

Economic and Social Council

NORTH AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR LOW-VOLTAGE FUSES

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. EEDI reduction beyond phase 2. Submitted by Liberia, ICS, BIMCO, INTERFERRY, INTERTANKO, CLIA and IPTA SUMMARY

MOTOR OIL MATTERS API Campaign to Promote Quality Motor Oils

Workshop on GHG Emission On Ships Co-organised by CIL and MPA

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission ( FTC or Commission ) has completed its

Consistent implementation of the 2020 sulphur limit and work to further address GHG emissions from international shipping

Regulatory update on implementation of the 0.50% sulphur limit for international shipping

Industry Lubricant Specifications Time For A Time-Out

REGULATORY CONTROL OF NUCLEAR FUEL AND CONTROL RODS

Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)

Certification Memorandum. Approved Model List Changes

Revised proposal to amend UN Global Technical Regulation No. 3 (Motorcycle brake systems) I. Statement of technical rationale and justification

Transcription:

Base Stock Slate Definition Progress Review Lubricants Group Work Group on Status Update on Base Stock Slate Definition May 5, 2011 Orlando 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-4070 www.api.org 1

Today s Review (May 2011) Report progress of Base Stock Slate Definition Work Group established by Lubricants Group Chair Key activities : (since Dec 9 LG meeting) Receipt of comments from 6 LG members through end of Feb Review of comments at BOI/VGRA venue and assignment of comments for action: Feb 23 Clarification sessions with LG responders April 26 Development of case for action by work group for API Legal prior to API addressing comments for API action (on going) Follow-up with several LG responders after clarification sessions (planned) Incorporation of comments and reissuing of proposal including full 1509-style text (planned)

Overall Comments about Intent of the Intra-slate guidelines Several comments attributed to this proposal an attempt to define what should be in a slate for a base stock manufacturer. However, this proposal was targeted at a lube marketer who is trying to decide if a change to a different base stock(s) from the same manufacturer warrant testing or not Basis is the base oil blend originally used in the qualified oil Uses properties of the base stocks Many comments during this review have been extremely helpful in clarifying this proposal It is a significant change and many have asked for clarifying examples The work group expresses its appreciation for those who so earnestly considered the proposal

Base Stock Slate Definition: key comments from clarification sessions E.1.2.2 A base stock slate is a product line of base stocks from a manufacturer that can be substituted in a finished oil with no performance penalty. Base stocks within a slate can be substituted to formulate different viscosity grades without performance penalty when applying VGRA Guidelines (Appendix F) Key comments: need to rewrite no performance penalty address inconsistent with intra-slate testing tables Needs clarifying example Needs to specify that the manufacturer specifies the slate Base stocks must be in the same API group (this omission was intentional)

Manufacturer Definition and Responsibilities key comments from clarification sessions E.1.2.2.1 A MANUFACTURER (REFINER, BLENDER OR MARKETER) of a base stock slate must be aware of, and in a position to affect, the quality of base stock manufacture and any changes to base stock quality within their defined base stock slate independent of base stock source. These responsibilities are important because base stock specifications are not always sufficient predictors of performance in finished engine oils. In addition to physical, chemical & known compositional parameters, additional parameters (e.g. feedstock, refining parameters, and quality assurance system) also influence engine oil performance. For base stock slate application under EOLCS, the licensee should ensure that the Manufacturer of the base stock slate/s used meets the above requirements. This definition encompasses the common usage of the term base stock manufacturer for purposes of base stock slate definition Defines the responsibilities of a base stock slate manufacturer Clarifies the importance of these responsibilities Re-affirms the licensee responsibility for the quality of the finished oil and hence the licensee should assure that the source of base oil used has an appropriate manufacturer per this definition.

Manufacturer Definition and Responsibilities key comments from clarification sessions E.1.2.2.1 A MANUFACTURER (REFINER, BLENDER OR MARKETER) of a base stock slate must be aware of, and in a position to affect, the quality of base stock manufacture and any changes to base stock quality within their defined base stock slate independent of base stock source. These responsibilities are important because base stock specifications are not always sufficient predictors of performance in finished engine oils. In addition to physical, chemical & known compositional parameters, additional parameters (e.g. feedstock, refining parameters, and quality assurance system) also influence engine oil performance. For base stock slate application under EOLCS, the licensee should ensure that the Manufacturer of the base stock slate/s used meets the above requirements. Key Comments: Issues around role of manufacturer vs marketer Comments around limits of blending within manufacturing Comments around need for similarity of manufacturing process for slate components Base Stock Manufacturers registration process needed (outside of WG scope)

Work Group Approach: tables key comments from clarification sessions Determined test by test important base oil and finished oil parameters that impact performance. Examined variability of these important parameters within example existing base stock slates as a guide. Considered test reproducibility in evaluating base oil impact on engine test parameters From the above analysis a set of test by test guidelines were developed for interchange within a base stock slate for passenger car motor oils (E5), heavy duty engine oils (E6) as well as bench testing used in approval for these oils (E7). Key Comments: Need for more thorough explanation/justification for values in the tables Need to better resolve emerging tests that do not have established BOI parameters Will address after follow up on key definition issues with LG responders who are reconsidering their comments

Resolution of Comments for API Action Case for action by work group for API Legal prior to API commenting on select comments for action is being reviewed Initial response is that API participation on work group will suffice to address comments identified for API resolution Any change must be justified that is proposed for 1509 API legal will review for anti-competitive issues Work Group (incl API staff) will now address

Comments?

Prior slides

Case for Action (i.e. issues with current slate definition) Current definitions: E.1.2.1 A base stock is a lubricant component that is produced by a single manufacturer to the same specifications (independent of feed source or manufacturer s location); that meets the same manufacturer s specification; and that is identified by a unique formula, product identification number, or both. Base stocks may be manufactured using a variety of different processes including but not limited to distillation, solvent refining, hydrogen processing, oligomerization, esterification, and rerefining. Rerefined stock shall be substantially free from materials introduced through manufacturing, contamination, or previous use. E.1.2.2 A base stock slate is a product line of base stocks that have different viscosities but are in the same base stock grouping and from the same manufacturer. E.1.2.3 A base oil is the base stock or blend of base stocks used in an APIlicensed oil.

Case for action: slate is of importance in licensed engine oils Practical benefits of "slate" The over-arching benefit is that "slate" is used in base stock substitution and thereby gives advantage to the use of slate in formulating products. The advantage for a "slate" accrues to both the owner of the slate and the finished lube blender. The finished lube blender can obtain greater range of different viscosity products (as well as flexibility in fulfilling their base stock needs for a given viscosity product) while reducing qualification cost. The owner of the slate can obtain supply or related benefits within a single manufacturing facility and/or across his various manufacturing locations. example 1: A 5W-30 engine oil is formulated with a Group II 4.7 cst @ 100 C cst base oil mix, made from 4.5 and 6 cst base stocks and is fully tested and qualified. This same product can be made from various combinations of other base stocks in the same slate with limited testing. Examples could include a 4 and an 8 cst OR a 4.5 and an 12 cst OR any combination of the 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8 and 12 cst stocks that meet the viscometrics. example 2: A 5W-30 engine oil is formulated with a Group II 4.7 cst @ 100 C cst base oil mix, made from 4.5 and 6 cst base stocks and is fully tested and qualified. Higher viscosity grade products, such as 10W-30, 10W-40, 15W-40, 20W-50 are made from the appropriate base stocks in the slate with limited testing according to the allowed tests in Appendix F. Bottom line from examples: "slate" provides advantage primarily in greater speed, flexibility and reduced testing.

Case for action: Issues with the Current Definitions Work Group Consensus on Issues with the Current Definitions As an industry group, various committees (API LG, BOI/VGRA task force etc) have tried to grapple with the definition and the impact of the definitions without clear resolution. We take this as evidence that the definitions need work and clarification and offer four issues that support a case for improvement the current definition: 1) "Manufacturer" definition does not adequately treat the key elements of being responsible for base oil quality. Definition was created during a time when lubricants predominantly were formulated either with all Group I or with all Group II. Manufacturing plants were generally simplified and/or represented a single location with limited ability to economically manufacture multiple stocks at overlapping viscosity grades. Current lubricants use a far more complex suite of base oils made in a greater range of manufacturing processes. The definition also does not define nor indicate any limits on "single manufacturer". No guidance is given on making base stocks/baseoils that should meet performance standards.

Case for action: Issues with the Current Definitions (cont d) 2) Without guidance on slate and manufacturer, significant variations in base stocks can arise which could result in oils that do not meet the performance standards. Manufacturers control the process of production and base oil interchange, by its very definition, acknowledges the importance of the manufacturer, nor that it is the manufacturer that defines the slate. Entities that merely buy/resell can circumvent the key aspects of BOI thereby resulting in oils that do not meet performance standards. 3) Diversity of manufacturing routes can lead to variations in base stocks even within a given API group and from a single manufacturer. Nothing prevents a single manufacturer from putting a wide range a quality in different basestocks. which could potentially move a passing oil to failure against the performance standards. 4) Slate is defined by different viscosities. However, the principle behind why viscosities are important is not enumerated nor is the viscosity specifically linked to a temperature, leaving uncertainty as to why this is important and provides no guidance for the formulator. While general practice at the time of the creation of the standard favors viscosities measured at 40 or 100 deg C, the reason is not clear. While it can be argued that this was to prevent different stocks have different properties within the same slate, no explanation nor limit was indicated.

Interchange of Base Stocks in the Same Base Stock Slate A new approach is needed to utilize the new definitions in moving from base stock similarity to performance in a finished oil The new definitions alone are inadequate to assure finished oil quality if widely different base stocks are included in the same slate The additional flexibility in defining base stock slates is balanced by new additional guidelines for changing stocks within a slate. The development of these new guidelines is based on technical principles derived from the existing base oil interchange principles, technical data and the application of the work group s expertise. The new guidelines should enable all practitioners to operate on a level playing field assuring finished product quality. The work group determined test by test important base oil and finished oil parameters that impact performance. The group also looked at variability of these parameter within example existing base stock slates as a guide. The group also considered test reproducibility in evaluating base oil impact on engine test parameters

Base Stock Slate Principles A key principle - No change in base stocks from those defined in the ACC Candidate Data Package can compromise the quality of oil being sold. Properties of the base oil blend determine whether interchange is allowed within a single manufacturer s slate or between different slates. Oil marketer is responsible for oil being sold should appear in an early section of API 1509, in addition to current use in Appendix E & F. Appropriate levels of base stock flexibility from tested formulations should be available The concept of the base oil manufacturer determining what constitutes his slate will be part of the proposal The base stock slate definition will be a result of and dependent upon the application of all these principles Only through consideration of all of the above principles and a new definition with guidelines can an acceptable, comprehensive approach be delivered

Base Stock Slate Definition In addition to minor changes to the text in the introduction, E1.1 the following items were added: E1.2.2 Base Stock Slate definition. E1.2.2.1 Manufacturer definition E5 Interchange of Base Stocks in the same slate for PCMO E.6 Interchange of Base Stocks in the Same Base Stock Slate for Heavy Duty Engine Oil E.7 Interchange of Base Stocks in the same Base Oil Slate for bench Tests (in progress) Full presentation to Lubes Group in November

Base Stock Slate Definition Base Stock Slate Work Group has been meeting for the last 10 months including 5 face to face and frequent teleconferences. Addressed base stock slate definition and concerns raised during industry dialogue. Base stock slate definition had to be coupled to changes in API 1509 addressing intra-slate base stock interchanges. Adopting a broader definition for base stock slate to encompass the diverse concerns raised in industry required additional guidelines to insure quality when applying the broader definition.

Interchange of Base Stocks in the Same Base Stock Slate Guidelines How to use the following section: GUIDELINE APPLICATION The following section provides testing guidelines for Passenger Car Engine oils. The changes being proposed are WITHIN a viscosity grade. Guidelines for changes between viscosity grades are already discussed in Appendix F. When a change in base stocks within a base stock slate is proposed for a formulation, certain base oil blend and finished oil properties should be determined: Base oil Blend Properties Saturates, Sulfur, Viscosity Index and Viscosity @ 100C Finished Oil NOACK, HTHS @ 100C, CCS, HTHS @ 150C. The differences between these properties for the tested oil(s) in the CDP and the proposed oil will determine if the change can be made within the base stock slate without the need for additional support. Only tests that are used in the API Service Category to be licensed need to be addressed for any specific change desired. When the guidelines below indicate that a particular test should be run, a passing result needs to be achieved.

E.5 Interchange of Base Stocks in the Same Base Stock Slate for Passenger Car Motor Oils Property Base Oil Saturates Level Base Oil Sulphur Level Base Oil Viscosity Index Base Oil Kinematic Viscosity @ 100C Finished Oil Noack Volatility Finished Oil HTHS Viscosity @ 100C Finished Oil HTHS Viscosity @ 150C Finished Oil CCS at W grade Temperature Change Sequence Test IIIG IIIGA IIIGB IVA VG VIB VID VIII Decrease 6% absolute or increase - - - - - - - - Decrease >6% absolute RUN 3 - - - RUN - - - Increase > 0.2% absolute - - - - RUN 1 - - - Increase 0.2% absolute or Decrease - - - - - - - - Decrease 10 Units or Increase - - - - - - - - Decrease > 10 Units RUN - - - - - - - Decrease 7% or Increase - - - - - - - - Decrease > 7% - - - RUN - - - - Increase > 2% absolute RUN - - - - - - - Increase 2% absolute or Decrease - - - - - - - - Increase - - - - - - RUN 2 - Decrease - - - - - - - - Increase > 7% - - - - - RUN - - Increase 7% or Decrease - - - - - - - - Increase > 15% - - - - - RUN - - Increase 15% or Decrease - - - - - - - - 1. Only required if interchange base stock is Group I 2. Not required if HTHS of candidate maximum HTHS supported by core data upon applying equations in section E.xx.xx 3. Omission pointed out at Nov LG meeting

Considerations for Individual Properties: PCMO Base Oil Saturates % = Passing Oil Base Oil Saturates - 2R%, Max Rationale: Covers range of current experience seen in slates Base Oil Sulfur % = Passing Oil Base Oil Sulfur + 0.2%, Max (Group I, only) Rationale: Covers range of current experience Base Oil VI = Passing Oil Base Oil VI 10 Numbers, Max Rationale: Appendix R example and typical range of experience NOACK % = Passing Oil NOACK +2%, Max (Round-up of R=1.62%) Rationale: Covers range of current experience, significant impact Base Oil Viscosity = Passing Oil BOV - 7%, Max Rationale: Greater change could adversely impact Sequence IVA. HTHS @ 100C = As allowed by Sequence VID BOI guideline calculations. Rationale: Sequence VID BOI is based on an industry accepted data. HTHS @ 150C = Passing Oil HTHS150 + 2R, Max Rationale: Covers range of current experience CCS = Passing Oil CCS + R, Max Rationale: Covers range of current experience

E.6 Interchange of Base Stocks in the Same Base Stock Slate for Heavy Duty Engine Oils Property Base Oil Saturates Level Change Increase > 6% absolute Increase or decrease 6% absolute Decrease >6% absolute EOAT, RFWT, 1N, 1P GM Cat MACK Cummins IIIF IIIG 1R C13 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 M11EGR ISM ISB - - - - RUN 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RUN RUN RUN RUN 1 RUN RUN RUN RUN RUN RUN RUN RUN Base Oil Sulphur Level Base Oil Viscosity Index Base Oil Kinematic Viscosity @ 100C Increase > 0.3% absolute Increase 0.3% absolute or Decrease Decrease 10 Units or Increase Decrease > 10 Units Decrease 7% or Increase - - - - RUN - RUN RUN - RUN RUN RUN RUN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RUN RUN RUN RUN - - - - - - - - Decrease > 7% - - - RUN - - - RUN RUN RUN RUN RUN Finished Oil Noack Volatility Increase > 2% absolute Increase 2 absolute or Decrease - RUN - - - RUN - - - - - - - - - - 1. Only required if Group I present in candidate or tested formulation

Considerations for Individual Properties: PCMO Base Oil Saturates % = Passing Oil Base Oil Saturates - 2R%, Max Rationale: Covers range of current experience seen in slates Base Oil Sulfur % = Passing Oil Base Oil Sulfur + 0.3%, Max (Group I, only) Rationale: Covers range of current experience Base Oil VI = Passing Oil Base Oil VI 10 Numbers, Max Rationale: Appendix R example and typical range of experience NOACK % = Passing Oil NOACK +2%, Max (Round-up of R=1.62%) Rationale: Covers range of current experience, significant impact Base Oil Viscosity = Passing Oil BOV - 7%, Max Rationale: Greater change could adversely impact Sequence IVA.

E.7 Interchange of Base Stocks in the Same Base Stock Slate for Bench Test Property Base Oil Saturates Level Base Oil Sulphur Level Change Increase > 6% absolute Increase or decrease 6% absolute Decrease >6% absolute Increase > 0.3% absolute Increase or decrease 0.3% absolute Decrease >0.3% absolute or TEOST Elastomers MACK Corrosion Compatibility 33 MHT CI4 CJ4 GF-5 T11A T12A BRT HTCBT H&M EOFT EOWT E-85 - RUN 2 RUN 3 RUN 3 RUN - TBD - - - - - - - - - - - - TBD - - - - - - - - RUN 3 RUN 3 RUN RUN TBD - - - - - - - - - - - - TBD - - - - - - - - - - - - TBD - RUN - - - - TBD - - - - - - Base Oil Viscosity Index Finished oil MRV Viscosity @ -20C Increase > 10 Units RUN 1 - - - - - TBD - - - - - - Increase or decrease 10 Units - - - TBD - - - - - - Decrease > 10 Units - RUN 2 - - - - TBD - - - - - - Increase - - - - - RUN TBD - - - - - - Same or decrease - - - - - - TBD - - - - - - 1. Not required if candidate base oil blend VI <120 2. Not required if existing support data is in Group II 3. Not required if covered by test matrix

Prior saved text Review conclusion of base stock slate definition work group activity Explanation of the principals Presentation of 1509 revision proposal Request input prior to presentation to full Lubes Group in November and BOI/VGRA in October