CR 510/85 Street from CR 512 to 58 Avenue

Similar documents
SH 249 PUBLIC MEETING DESIGN CHANGES FROM FM 2920 TO HARDIN STORE ROAD

Public Information Workshop

Purpose and Need Report

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

PUBLIC MEETING. Bear Creek Park Community Center. January 24, :30 pm to 7:30 pm

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Appendix 3 Traffic Technical Memorandum

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

MEMORANDUM. Project Description. Operational Trip Generation. Construction Trip Generation. Date: August 12, 2014 TG: To: From: Subject:

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

Additional $200 Speeding Fine Signs

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

A IR Q UALITY A PPENDIX

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

Clearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

P07033 US 50 EB Weaving Analysis between El Dorado Hills and Silva Valley Ramp Metering Analysis for US 50 EB On-Ramp at Latrobe Road

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

City of Pacific Grove

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

Load Rating for SHVs and EVs

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

CHAPTER 7: EMISSION FACTORS/MOVES MODEL

Environmental Assessment Derry Road and Argentia Road Intersection

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

1.1 Purpose of This Environmental Impact Report EIR Process Use of This Report Report Organization...

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

SWCAA 492. Oxygenated Fuels

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

WOODVILLE HIGHWAY (SR 363) PD&E STUDY From Capital Circle Southeast To Paul Russell Road FPID NUMBER: Public Hearing

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

STAFF REPORT # CHANGE OF ZONING

Applicable California Vehicle Code Sections, 2015 Edition

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Introduction. Assumptions. Jeff Holstein, P.E., City of Brooklyn Park Steve Wilson, Principal Tim Babich, Associate Krista Anderson, Engineer

AIR QUALITY ROUTE 29 BYPASS PROJECT TECHNICAL REPORT STATE PROJECT: , P101; UPC Prepared for: From: Route 250 Bypass

Agenda Item: NB-4 Meeting Date:

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

HARDEE COUNTY ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT Driveway-Culvert Installation Permit

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Appendix C Noise and Vibration Worksheets

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

Lower River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Noise Analysis

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

Illinois Route 60/83 Widening and Reconstruction IL Route 176 to IL Route 60 P Traffic Noise Analysis Technical Report FINAL

Travel Forecasting Methodology

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

FIELD APPLICATIONS OF CORSIM: I-40 FREEWAY DESIGN EVALUATION, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. Michelle Thomas

Interchange Justification Report

MANHATTAN VILLAGE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT

Highway 23 New London Access & Safety Assessment. Public Open House #2 October 3, :00 to 7:00 PM

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report BAY COUNTY 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Appendix C. Traffic Study

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

TRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS

Traffic Generation November 28, Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

Access Management Standards

BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS OF RANDOLPH ROAD: HIGHWAY 87 TO VAIL ROAD TIGER II GRANT APPLICATION

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis

Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study

Citizens Committee for Facilities

RE: Traffic Impact Statement: Paper Mill Lake Subdivision

Red Wing US 63 Bridge and Approach Roadways

Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009

SECTION 9 STORM SEWER INLETS

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles

FLAMBOROUGH QUARRY HAUL ROUTE STUDY HAUL ROUTE VIBRATION REPORT. itrans Consulting Inc 100 York Boulevard Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1J8

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Transcription:

Date: November 14, 2017 To: CR 510/ 85 Street PD& Project File From: Metric ngineering, Inc. Subject: FM No.: 405606-2-22-02 Air Quality Screening Test CR 510/85 Street from CR 512 to 58 Avenue Indian River County The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried out by FDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 14, 2016 and executed by FHWA and FDOT. The proposed project is located in Indian River County, an area currently designated as being in attainment for all criteria air pollutants. The project area predominantly contains residential and agricultural land uses, along with the two public schools and several parks/preserves. The project was reviewed for air quality impacts consistent with the FHWA Discussion Paper: Appropriate Level of Highway Air Quality Analysis for a C, A/FONSI, and IS. The project alternatives were subjected to a carbon monoxide (CO) screening model that makes various conservative worst-case assumptions related to site conditions, meteorology and traffic. The Florida Department of Transportation s (FDOT s) screening model for CO uses the latest United States nvironmental Protection Agency (PA)-approved software to produce estimates of one-hour and eight-hour CO at default air quality receptor locations. The one-hour and eight-hour estimates can be directly compared to the current one-and eight-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for CO. The roadway intersections forecast to have the highest total approach traffic volumes are where CR 510 intersects 66 Avenue and CR 512. The Build and No-Build scenarios for both the opening year (2020) and the design year (2040) were evaluated. The traffic data input used in the evaluation is attached to this memorandum. stimates of CO were predicted for the default receptors which are located 10 feet to 150 feet from the edge of the roadway. Based on the results from the screening model, the highest project-related CO oneand eight-hour levels are not predicted to meet or exceed the one- or eight-hour NAAQS for this pollutant with either the No-Build or Build alternatives. As such, the project passes the screening model. The results of the screening model are attached to this memorandum. The project is located in an area which is designated attainment for all of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards under the criteria provided in the Clean Air Act. Therefore, the Clean Air Act conformity requirements do not apply to the project. The project is expected to improve traffic flow by adding lanes to relieve congestion, which should reduce operational greenhouse gas emissions.

CO Florida 2012 - CR 510 and 66 Ave Year 2020 Intersection Type 4 X 4 Speed Arterial 35 mph Approach Traffic Arterial 861 vph 1 2.8 1.7 2 3.1 1.9 3 3.2 1.9 4 2.8 1.7 5 2.8 1.7 6 2.8 1.7 7 3.1 1.9 8 3.2 1.9 9 2.8 1.7 10 2.8 1.7 11 2.8 1.7 12 3.1 1.9 13 3.3 2.0 14 2.8 1.7 15 2.8 1.7 16 2.9 1.7 17 3.1 1.9 18 3.2 1.9 19 2.8 1.7 20 2.8 1.7 *NO XCDANCS OF NAAQ STANDARDS AR PRDICTD*

CO Florida 2012 - CR 510 and 66 Ave - Build Year 2020 Intersection Type 4 X 4 Speed Arterial 35 mph Approach Traffic Arterial 926 vph 1 2.9 1.7 2 3.1 1.9 3 3.4 2.0 4 3.0 1.8 5 2.9 1.7 6 2.9 1.7 7 3.1 1.9 8 3.4 2.0 9 2.9 1.7 10 2.9 1.7 11 2.9 1.7 12 3.1 1.9 13 3.4 2.0 14 2.9 1.7 15 2.9 1.7 16 3.0 1.8 17 3.1 1.9 18 3.4 2.0 19 3.0 1.8 20 2.9 1.7 *NO XCDANCS OF NAAQ STANDARDS AR PRDICTD*

CO Florida 2012 - CR 510 and 66 Ave Year 2040 Intersection Type 4 X 4 Speed Arterial 35 mph Approach Traffic Arterial 1352 vph 1 3.2 1.9 2 3.3 2.0 3 3.5 2.1 4 3.3 2.0 5 3.1 1.9 6 3.2 1.9 7 3.3 2.0 8 3.5 2.1 9 3.2 1.9 10 3.1 1.9 11 3.2 1.9 12 3.3 2.0 13 3.5 2.1 14 3.2 1.9 15 3.1 1.9 16 3.2 1.9 17 3.4 2.0 18 3.5 2.1 19 3.2 1.9 20 3.1 1.9 *NO XCDANCS OF NAAQ STANDARDS AR PRDICTD*

CO Florida 2012 - CR 510 and 66 Ave - Build Year 2040 Intersection Type 4 X 4 Speed Arterial 35 mph Approach Traffic Arterial 1532 vph 1 3.4 2.0 2 3.6 2.2 3 3.8 2.3 4 3.6 2.2 5 3.2 1.9 6 3.4 2.0 7 3.6 2.2 8 3.8 2.3 9 3.5 2.1 10 3.2 1.9 11 3.5 2.1 12 3.6 2.2 13 3.8 2.3 14 3.5 2.1 15 3.2 1.9 16 3.4 2.0 17 3.7 2.2 18 3.8 2.3 19 3.5 2.1 20 3.2 1.9 *NO XCDANCS OF NAAQ STANDARDS AR PRDICTD*

Facility Name CO Florida 2012 - CR 510 CR 510 and CR 512 Year 2020 Intersection Type 6 X 4 Speed Arterial 30 mph Approach Traffic Arterial 999 vph 1 2.8 1.7 2 3.1 1.9 3 3.4 2.0 4 2.9 1.7 5 2.7 1.6 6 2.6 1.6 7 2.9 1.7 8 3.1 1.9 9 3.1 1.9 10 2.9 1.7 11 2.8 1.7 12 3.1 1.9 13 3.4 2.0 14 2.9 1.7 15 2.7 1.6 16 2.6 1.6 17 2.9 1.7 18 3.1 1.9 19 3.1 1.9 20 2.9 1.7 *NO XCDANCS OF NAAQ STANDARDS AR PRDICTD*

CO Florida 2012 - CR 510 and CR 512 - Build Year 2020 Intersection Type 6 X 4 Speed Arterial 30 mph Approach Traffic Arterial 999 vph 1 2.8 1.7 2 3.1 1.9 3 3.4 2.0 4 2.9 1.7 5 2.7 1.6 6 2.6 1.6 7 2.9 1.7 8 3.1 1.9 9 3.1 1.9 10 2.9 1.7 11 2.8 1.7 12 3.1 1.9 13 3.4 2.0 14 2.9 1.7 15 2.7 1.6 16 2.6 1.6 17 2.9 1.7 18 3.1 1.9 19 3.1 1.9 20 2.9 1.7 *NO XCDANCS OF NAAQ STANDARDS AR PRDICTD*

CO Florida 2012 - CR 510 and CR 512 Year 2040 Intersection Type 6 X 4 Speed Arterial 30 mph Approach Traffic Arterial 1161 vph 1 2.8 1.7 2 3.0 1.8 3 3.2 1.9 4 2.8 1.7 5 2.5 1.5 6 2.6 1.6 7 2.7 1.6 8 3.1 1.9 9 2.8 1.7 10 2.8 1.7 11 2.8 1.7 12 3.0 1.8 13 3.2 1.9 14 2.8 1.7 15 2.5 1.5 16 2.6 1.6 17 2.7 1.6 18 3.1 1.9 19 2.8 1.7 20 2.8 1.7 *NO XCDANCS OF NAAQ STANDARDS AR PRDICTD*

CO Florida 2012 - CR 510 and CR 512 - Build Year 2040 Intersection Type 6 X 4 Speed Arterial 30 mph Approach Traffic Arterial 1199 vph 1 2.9 1.7 2 3.0 1.8 3 3.2 1.9 4 2.8 1.7 5 2.6 1.6 6 2.6 1.6 7 2.7 1.6 8 3.1 1.9 9 2.9 1.7 10 2.8 1.7 11 2.9 1.7 12 3.0 1.8 13 3.2 1.9 14 2.8 1.7 15 2.6 1.6 16 2.6 1.6 17 2.7 1.6 18 3.1 1.9 19 2.9 1.7 20 2.8 1.7 *NO XCDANCS OF NAAQ STANDARDS AR PRDICTD*