Department of the Air Force Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Report Compliance with EPAct 1992/2005 and E.O for Fiscal Year 2007

Similar documents
DEFENSE AGENCIES Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Report Compliance with EPAct and E.O in Fiscal Year 2008

U.S. Navy Fleet AFV Program Report for Fiscal Year 2006 February 12, 2007

U.S. Navy Fleet AFV Program Report for Fiscal Year 2008 May 21, 2009

U.S. Navy Fleet AFV Program Report for Fiscal Year 2009 January 12, 2010

U.S. Postal Service Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Program Report for Fiscal Year 2012 February 15, 2013

Fleet Sustainability Policy

U.S. Department of Energy: Vehicle Technology and Infrastructure Deployment

DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE 8899 East 56 th Street Indianapolis, in Agency Fleet Management Plan for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017

Green California Summit & Exposition April 7,2008. Green Fleets: Kicking Tires & Crunching Numbers The 1992 Federal Energy Policy Act (EPAct)

Bringing Together State, Alternative Fuel. Fuel Providers to Increase Use of. Fleet Regulatory Requirements. New West Technologies Ryan Daley

Federal Fleet Management: Fleet Laws and Regulations

CAPITAL PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SECTION VIII FACILITIES OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

MEMORANDUM. Proposed Town of Chapel Hill Green Fleets Policy

Minnesota State Light Vehicle Fleet Sustainability Benchmarks FY 2018

SANTEE COOPER Biodiesel Fuel Usage. Presentation To National Clean Cities Conference May 5, 2004 Ft Lauderdale, FL

State of New Jersey Alternative Fuel Program

TOWN OF MONTREAT GREEN FLEET POLICY (Adopted April 8, 2010)

Montgomery County Department of General Services DGS Delivering Green Service

Winston-Salem State University

Caltrans Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Experience. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Equipment (DOE)

Alternative Fuel Vehicles by Type: Pros, Cons, and Case Studies. Cabell Hodge National Renewable Energy Laboratory

FleetDASH. Fleet Sustainability Dashboard - FleetDASH. Mark Singer National Renewable Energy Laboratory August 17, 2017

The United States Postal Service Ethanol & Bio-Diesel Programs. The Alternative Clean Transportation Conference Long Beach, California May 6, 2014

FAST EISA Section 246 Infrastructure Reporting FAQ

OTC/MANE-VU. 19 November 2014

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS GREEN FLEET POLICY

California Low Emission Truck Policies and Plans

U.S. Alternative Fuels Policies Lessons Learned and Future Directions

Air. Goals: Improve statewide air quality Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 9 DRAFT DRAFT

Vehicle and Equipment Services (4760P)

Clean Cities 101. Dallas-Fort Worth Clean Cities Coalition North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department 1

AFV Driver Training. Presented by Annalloyd Thomason 10 th National Clean Cities Conference Coordinator Meeting May 2, 2004

Refuel: San Diego Regional Alternative Fuel Coordinating Council. Kick-off Meeting October 16, 2014

FLEET SERVICES OVERVIEW and ACCOMPLISHMENTS Public Works Commission August 10, 2017

Performance Metrics for the Organizational Fleet Manager. William Gookin & Scott Conlon Mercury Associates

Pima Association of Governments Energy Programs Clean Cities

Criteria. As background, the US Environmental Protection Agency s Green Vehicle Guide states that:

Electric Vehicles and EV Infrastructure Municipal Electric Power Association

Fleet Characterization Combat Element Logistics Head Significant logistics support is required to transport fuel and supplies to the combat elements a

U S Postal Service Fleet Planning and Management. GovEnergy 2007

Alternative Fuels: Existing Conditions

Australia s Experience in Alternative Transport Fuels. An Overview

University of North Carolina at Asheville

Conventional Fuel Management Strategies That Work

Benefits of greener trucks and buses

PROMOTING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC AND OTHER LOW EMISSION VEHICLES

Central Kansas Clean Cities Alternative Fuels in Kansas

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT SUPPORT LOGISTICS AGENCY

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

University of North Carolina at Wilmington

[Author Name] [Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.] Green Fleet Policy

Tennessee Clean Fuels 2018 Calendar Year Fleet Data Collection SURVEY

Development of CNG Market Using Flared Gas. Masami KOJIMA Oil, Gas and Mining Policy Division The World Bank

TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION 2008 ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN

CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS

Driving Sustainability with Technology, Information, and Tools

Trends in Iowa Ethanol Blends Sales: E10, E15, E20, and E85 and the Biofuel Distribution Percentage

Case Study: Arlington County s Implementation and Operational Experience with B20 Biodiesel VIRGINIA

Fayetteville State University

Emerging Technologies

Canada s Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations for Model Years

State of New Jersey Alternative Fuel Program

U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle GHG and CAFE Standards

NAT GAS Acts S 1408 vs. HR 1835 Side by Side

Department of Legislative Services

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

Air Force Operational Energy

ALTERNATIVELY FUELED VEHICLE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017

3.17 Energy Resources

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TRANSPORTATION BIOFUELS PLANNING STUDY

U.S. Air Force Energy Program

2018 GHG Emissions Report

Improving the quality of life in the communities we serve.

Solano County Transit

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Alternative Fuels

ON-ROAD FUEL ECONOMY OF VEHICLES

Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE REVISED FISCAL IMPACT (replaces fiscal note dated March 21, 2013)

State of the States. Tim Keaveney. Doing More. Company

RFS2: Where Are We Now And Where Are We Heading? Paul N. Argyropoulos

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

NELP. Vol. 5 March Navy Environmental Leadership Program. bulletin. Alternative Fuel Vehicle Program. Electric Vehicle Program

Zero Emissions Airport Vehicle and Infrastructure Pilot Program Webinar

2010 Advanced Energy Conference. Electrification Technology and the Future of the Automobile. Mark Mathias

Tribal Transit Presentation. April 2011

VEHICLE FLEET MANAGEMENT AT THE IDAHO NATIONAL ENGINEERING AND ENVl RONMENTAL LABORATORY

NC STATE UNIVERSITY FLEET SERVICES

ARI SUSTAINABLEWORKS FLEET GUIDE. Driving Smarter, Cleaner

Natural Gas Powered Refuse Trucks: Cleaner-Cheaper-Domestic

Review of the SMAQMD s Construction Mitigation Program Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices February 28, 2018, DRAFT for Outreach

Alternative Fuel Price Report

Clean Cities Presentation

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Dear New Clean Cities Stakeholder:

How Fuel Cells Help Meet State Energy Goals

Laboratory Puts Alternative-Fuel

Alternative Fuel Requirements for School Districts. Peter Moulton Alternative Fuels & Vehicles Lead Energy Division

RE: Comments on Proposed Mitigation Plan for the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust

Direct Injection Ethanol Boosted Gasoline Engines: Biofuel Leveraging For Cost Effective Reduction of Oil Dependence and CO 2 Emissions

Systems Analysis of China s Fuel/Vehicle Alternatives: Policy Implications for 2020

Automotive Fuel Economy Program. Annual Update Calendar Year National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS September 2002

Transcription:

Department of the Air Force Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Report Compliance with EPAct 1992/2005 and E.O. 13423 for Fiscal Year 2007 This report summarizes the Department of the Air Force's (USAF) fiscal year (FY) 2007 fleet performance in meeting the requirements of the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005 (Public Law 109-58) and in meeting the goals of Executive Order (E.O.) 13423 (Exhibit 1). Exhibit 1. USAF's Performance in Meeting EPAct 2005 and E.O. 13423 Requirements, FY07 Authority/ Mandate Performance Measure Goal/Requirement USAF Performance in FY07 EPAct 2005 Alternative fueled vehicle (AFV) acquisitions 75% of the covered light-duty vehicles (LDV) acquired in FY07 must be AFVs Met goal - 119% of the covered LDVs acquired in FY07 were AFVs Alternative fuel use in AFVs Utilize alternative fuels 100% of the time in AFVs Did not meet goal - Utilized alternative fuels 53.5% of the time in AFVs E.O. 13423 Reduce fossil fuel consumption Reduce covered consumption by 2% annually compared to FY05 baseline Did not meet goal - Decreased covered fossil fuel consumption by 0.04% Increase alternative fuels consumption Increase alternative fuel consumption by 10% annually as compared to FY05 baseline Did not meet goal - Decreased alternative fuel consumption by 3.4% EPAct 2005 Compliance For the fifth consecutive year, the USAF exceeded its EPAct requirements for AFV acquisitions (Exhibit 2). As a result of its aggressive AFV acquisition policy and biodiesel fuel use, the USAF in FY07 earned AFV acquisition credits amounting to 119% of its covered vehicle acquisitions, which is 44 percentage points higher than the 75% AFV acquisition requirement (Appendix A). In short, the USAF: Acquired 1,765 EPAct-covered LDVs. Of these, 1,445 or 81.9% were AFVs Received an additional 662 credits through the use of biodiesel Earned a total of 2,107 credits (including vehicle acquisitions and additional credits) or 119% of covered acquisitions 1

2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Goal AFV Acquistions/Credits Exhibit 2. EPAct AFV Acquisitions, Credits, and Requirements (Actual and Projected) Alternative Fuel Vehicles Flexible-fuel vehicles (FFV) that can run on E85 (85% ethanol, 15% gasoline) or gasoline were the AFV of choice in FY07. Of the 1,445 AFVs acquired in FY07, 1,442 were FFVs and 3 were Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) vehicles. FFVs capable of operating on E85 comprise the majority of USAF s AFV fleet (Exhibit 3), with CNG and electric vehicles making up the balance. As the availability of CNG and electric dedicated and bi-fuel vehicle models decreases, these vehicle types will become less prevalent in USAF's fleet. Exhibit 3. USAF s Total AFV Inventory E85 5321 Electric 25 CNG 1033 Electric CNG E85 Exemptions Of the 2,355 total LDVs acquired by the USAF in FY07, 590 vehicles (25%) were considered exempt from compliance with EPAct. Exemptions are granted for fleet size, geographic location or use outside a Metropolitan Statistical Area/Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA/CMSA), and use for law enforcement. In FY07, USAF received the following exemptions: Fleet Size - 0 Geographic - 0 2

Law Enforcement - 211 Non-MSA/CMSA Operation (Fleet) - 0 Non-MSA/CMSA Operation (Vehicles) - 379 FY08/09 Projected Acquisitions The appendices to this report offer a detailed look at the USAF's FY07 acquisitions (Appendix A) and its projected acquisitions for FY08 and FY09 (Appendices B and C). As illustrated in Exhibit 2, the USAF has exceeded its annual EPAct AFV acquisition requirements since FY03 and plans to continue to exceed these requirements over the next 2 years. E.O. 13423 Compliance Exhibit 4 compares USAF s covered fuel use in FY07 with the FY06 consumption. E.O. 13423 calls for each agency to reduce vehicular petroleum consumption by 2% a year through FY 2015 using FY05 as a baseline with continued increase of alternative fuel consumption by 10% a year compounded annually. In FY07, the USAF had only a.04% reduction in fossil fuel consumption in comparison to FY06, which did not meet the mandate. However, compared to FY05 the Air Force reduced vehicle fossil fuel consumption by 2.4%. Additionally, the USAF did not meet the goal of increasing alternative fuel consumption by 10% due to significant decreases in Bio diesel, B20 consumption. B20 consumption was lower due to the EPAmandated conversion from low sulfur diesel fuel, LSD to ultra low sulfur diesel, ULSD fuel throughout the CONUS. As bases converted from LSD to ULSD, no mechanism in the fuels accountability was used to determine if the ULSD contained a 20% biomix or straight diesel. Therefore, some of the LSD B20 may have been converted to straight ULSD, reducing available B20 and lowering consumption, while some of the ULSD B20 may have been mistakenly counted as regular ULSD, further reducing consumption figures. Even though the goal for increasing the use of alternative fuels was not met, the USAF did increase E85 consumption by 61% in comparison to the FY05 baseline (FY05: 258,431 vice FY07: 418,077). We expect continued increase of E85 consumption in the future due to on-going efforts identifying off base availability. Additionally, fuel keys have been locked out for AFVs for use of pure gasoline and diesel at locations with E85 & B20 to ensure 100% use. Finally, guidance has been published mandating the use of alternative fuels in AFVs at locations with available sources within 5 miles or 15 minutes driving time of the base.. Exhibit 4. USAF s Total Covered Fuel Use Fuel Use FY05 (GGE) FY07 (GGE) Alternative Fuel B100 Biomass portion of the B20 774,182 605,416 CNG 100,530 70,237 E85 258,431 418,077 Electricity 1,677 2,259 Total Alternative Fuel Use 1,134,973 1,096,020 Covered Petroleum Diesel 2,663,296 2,955,202 DSL Component from Biodiesel 1,851,693 1,800,086 Gasoline 8,695,861 8,138,049 Total Covered Petroleum Use 13,210,849 12,893,337 Petroleum Consumption Progress Report Exhibit 5 shows that although the USAF reduced its covered fuel consumption from the FY05 baseline, it increased non-covered petroleum consumption in overseas locations and fuel used in law enforcement and emergency response vehicles. Our on-base fuel accountability is improving due to specific Air Force guidance for vehicle fuel key coding for better monitoring and depicting covered and uncovered fuel consumption. Also General Services Administration (GSA) is estimating availability of providing fuel 3

consumption by tag number for leased assets during the spring of 2008, further enhancing our ability to accurately report consumption for all vehicles and fuel types. Exhibit 5. USAF s Vehicular Petroleum Consumption USAF Fleet Successes Installed E85 fuel station at F.E. Warren Air Force Base (AFB), Wyoming and Minot AFB, North Dakota. Additional an E85 station at Little Rock AFB is scheduled to come on-line by the end Jan 08. Established a Model Energy Base Initiative (MEBI) to validate vehicle requirements at Barksdale & McGuire AFBs to improve the process for identifying vehicles that could be changed to AFVs or low speed vehicles (LSV). The Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Installations, Logistics and Environment was so pleased with results of the two MEBI visits conducted in FY07 and plans are pending to accomplish 30 other bases pending travel funding. The MEBI promotes the use of new technology to maximize our efforts to use alternative fuels and continues the process for examining new ways to reduce fossil fuel dependency through alternative energy solutions. Major Commands identified 772 LSVs for procurement at a cost of $7.3M. An additional $36M is required in FY09 thru FY10 for LSV procurement in order to achieve a 30% or more miles per gallon than conventional gas or diesel vehicles. The USAF, in conjunction with DESC, is continually working to balance funding constraints to provide alternative fuel infrastructure to meet on-going requirements. The Air Force Petroleum Agency (AFPET) also continues to work diligently with DESC by submitting 39 additional projects that are in design or awaiting funds for 2008-2013. However, it is unlikely that DESC funding will be available to provide the tankage needed in the near future. Within the past fiscal year, the USAF reduced 699 vehicle authorizations and right sized 2,485 vehicle authorizations. Of the 2,485 authorizations right sized, 772 were converted to LSVs. The prime factors for determining an authorization will be mission requirements/ops tempo, availability of alternative fuel infrastructure and historical/estimated annual miles driven. Local Fleet Managers will determine if a LSV, AFV or hybrid will first meet the customer's needs. If these types of conveyances will not meet the customer's needs, then a diesel engine-powered vehicle (if biodiesel (B20) is available locally) will be the next choice with a conventional gasoline vehicle as a last resort. The Air Force's goal is to replace 30% of our light duty fleet with LSVs by FY12. $36M is needed through FY12 to fund the LSV 4

replacements. The initiative to aggressively replace conventional vehicle authorizations with LSVs is receiving a great deal of senior Air Force leadership emphasis and oversight. Nellis and Minot Air Force Bases are testing the use of oxygenated ultra low sulfur bio diesel. The fuel is essentially an oxygenated (02) Biodiesel (B20) Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel and equates to a 27.5% biomass diesel product that burns cleaner than regular diesel. Minot AFB is testing cold weather feasibility. The Air Force's Advanced Power Technology Office (APTO) has 20 projects involving hydrogen fuel cells/electric prototype vehicles, 3 hydrogen fueling stations for mobile, stationary, cold region and limited scale requirement use, 2 joint services fossil fuel conversion projects, 13 Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Phase I & II projects, 4 Fischer Tropsch projects and 3 Renewable Energy projects. The SBIR develops and tests various technologies in hybrid and electrical motor capabilities for vehicles and aerospace equipment. Following are some of the more significant projects presently being worked by the APTO: Hydrogen Refueling Station Congressionally Funded Hydrogen Infrastructure Project: This project develops and demonstrates hydrogen refueling equipment for limited scaled requirements. It complements the hydrogen fuel cell vehicles by providing the capability to be deployed for operations at multiple locations to support hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Station will be built to be expandable and capable of producing from 6 to 40 kilograms of hydrogen. This project is the first task order on the APTO IDIQ and is scheduled to begin construction in the Spring of 2008 and be completed by the fall. Hydrogen Fuel Cell Powered Tow Tractor. Congressionally Funded C2P2 Project: Convert a hybrid diesel - electric MB-4 tow tractor to a hybrid hydrogen fuel cell electric MB-4 tow tractor. Removed the diesel engine, fuel tank and diesel supporting auxiliary components and added a hydrogen fuel cell, storage compartment, power management and auxiliary components. Delivered 2006. Under sustainment and follow-on to begin in 2008. Fischer Tropsch Demonstration APTO Project AF Senior Energy Focus Group tasking to demonstrate S-8 synthetic fuel in a field application. S-8 is produced using Fischer Tropsch process by Syntroleum. This is an out of the laboratory utilization of S-8 fuel in 2 pieces of support equipment and 3 vehicles. Develop and Integrate Auxiliary Power in Vehicles Congressionally Funded Infrastructure Project: Develop and integrate auxiliary power capability in an M915. It will have the capability to provide additional power generation resources at a fraction of the cost of a separate unit reducing the logistic footprint for deployment. 5

Summary and Conclusions In FY07, the USAF exceeded its EPAct AFV acquisition requirements and expects to exceed them again in FY08 and FY09. The Air Force is working diligently in its efforts towards meeting EPA, DOE and DoD regulations and mandates. Since 11 Sep 01 to the present the USAF operations tempo is continually increasing making it more and more difficult to meet these mandates. Operations to support contingencies in Iraq and Afghanistan and other global commitments have a direct effort on our efforts to meet EPAct and E.O. mandates. Despite this difficult era, the Air Force remained committed to reducing our fossil fuel consumption. Unfortunately, despite our aggressive AFV acquisitions and increased use of E85, we did not achieve the required 10% increase in use of alternative fuels, largely due to the reduced consumption of B20. Conversion from low sulfur diesel fuel to ultra low sulfur diesel fuel was the main reason for our decreased B20 consumption. We are relying heavily on the Air Force Petroleum Office (AFPET) to continue its efforts in obtaining alternative fuel infrastructure through DESC and we further expect they will work diligently at improving the availability of quality alternative fuels at locations that already have alternative fuel infrastructure in place. In any case, the current Global War on Terror and sustained security threat levels at stateside Air Force bases continue to complicate our efforts towards moving more aggressively in meeting EPAct and E.O. mandates. Finally, HQ USAF/A4RE will continue to provide guidance on obtaining and utilizing AFVs, LSVs, hybrids and alternative fuels to the maximum extent possible and will aid the major command and wing level logistic leaders with their efforts towards meeting EPAct 1992/2005 and E.O. 13423 mandates. 6

Appendix A Department of Air Force Complex-Wide AFV Report 2007 Actual Actual Department of Air Force FY 2007 Vehicle Acquisitions Actual FY 2007 Light-Duty Vehicle Acquisitions Leased Purchased Total Total number of Light-Duty (8,500 GVWR) - Vehicle Acquisitions Exemptions 7 Total Vehicle Inventory 1,755 600 2,355 16,325 Fleet Size 0 0 0 0 Geographic 0 0 0 0 Law Enforcement 106 105 211 919 Non-MSA Operation (fleet) 0 0 0 0 Non-MSA Operation (vehicles) 253 126 379 (n/a) EPACT Covered Acquisitions 1,396 369 1,765 15,406 Actual FY 2007 AFV Acquisitions Vehicle Leased Purchased Total Total Vehicle Inventory Sedan CNG Bi-Fuel Subcompact 0 0 0 9 Sedan CNG Bi-Fuel Compact 0 0 0 2 Sedan E-85 Flex-Fuel Compact 87 8 95 1,227 Sedan E-85 Flex-Fuel Midsize 534 0 534 661 Pickup 4x2 CNG Bi-Fuel 0 0 0 546 Pickup 4x2 CNG Dedicated 0 0 0 1 Pickup 4x2 E-85 Flex-Fuel 105 140 245 1,465 Pickup 4x2 Electric Dedicated 0 0 0 25 Pickup 4x2 LPG Bi-Fuel 0 0 0 1 Pickup 4x4 CNG Bi-Fuel 0 0 0 22 Pickup 4x4 CNG Dedicated 0 0 0 1 Pickup 4x4 E-85 Flex-Fuel 62 18 80 331 SUV 4x2 E-85 Flex-Fuel 9 0 9 50 SUV 4x4 CNG Bi-Fuel 0 0 0 1 SUV 4x4 E-85 Flex-Fuel 95 11 106 413 Minivan 4x2 (Passenger) E-85 Flex-Fuel 239 7 246 1,006 Minivan 4x2 (Cargo) E-85 Flex-Fuel 0 14 14 4 Van 4x2 (Passenger) CNG Bi-Fuel 0 2 2 7 Van 4x2 (Passenger) CNG Dedicated 0 0 0 6 Van 4x2 (Passenger) E-85 Flex-Fuel 14 3 17 39 Van 4x4 (Passenger) E-85 Flex-Fuel 5 0 5 5 Van 4x2 (Cargo) CNG Bi-Fuel 0 0 0 11 Van 4x2 (Cargo) CNG Dedicated 0 0 0 3 Van 4x2 (Cargo) E-85 Flex-Fuel 18 0 18 33 Bus CNG Bi-Fuel 0 0 0 1 Bus CNG Dedicated 0 0 0 19 Pickup MD CNG Bi-Fuel 0 0 0 211 Pickup MD E-85 Flex-Fuel 1 70 71 80 Van MD (Passenger) CNG Bi-Fuel 0 0 0 81

Van MD (Passenger) CNG Dedicated 0 0 0 10 Van MD (Passenger) E-85 Flex-Fuel 1 0 1 2 Van MD (Cargo) CNG Bi-Fuel 0 1 1 29 Van MD (Cargo) CNG Dedicated 0 0 0 4 MD 8,501-16,000 GVWR CNG Bi-Fuel 0 0 0 62 MD 8,501-16,000 GVWR E-85 Flex-Fuel 1 0 1 5 HD 16,001 + GVWR CNG Bi-Fuel 0 0 0 7 Total Number of AFV Acquisitions 1,171 274 1,445 6,380 Zero Emission Vehicle Credits 0 0 0 0 Dedicated Light-Duty AFV Credits 0 0 0 0 Dedicated Medium-Duty AFV Credits 0 0 0 0 Dedicated Heavy-Duty AFV Credits 0 0 0 0 Biodiesel Fuel Usage Credits - Actual 0 0 662 0 Total AFV Acquisitions with Credits 1,171 274 2,107 0 AFV Percentage of Covered Light-Duty Vehicle Acquisition 119 % 0 8

Appendix B Department of Air Force Complex-Wide AFV Report 2008 - Planned Planned Department of Air Force FY 2008 Vehicle Acquisitions Planned FY 2008 Light-Duty Vehicle Acquisitions Leased Purchased Total Total number of Light-Duty (8,500 GVWR) - Vehicle Acquisitions 2,038 960 2,998 Fleet Size 0 0 0 Geographic 0 0 0 Exemptions Law Enforcement 95 80 175 Non-MSA Operation (fleet) 0 0 0 Non-MSA Operation (vehicles) 1,224 79 1,303 EPACT Covered Acquisitions 719 801 1,520 Planned FY 2008 AFV Acquisitions Vehicle Leased Purchased Total Sedan CNG Bi-Fuel Subcompact 9 0 9 Sedan E-85 Flex-Fuel Compact 386 16 402 Sedan E-85 Flex-Fuel Midsize 54 1 55 Pickup 4x2 CNG Bi-Fuel 40 0 40 Pickup 4x2 E-85 Flex-Fuel 120 299 419 Pickup 4x4 CNG Bi-Fuel 3 0 3 Pickup 4x4 E-85 Flex-Fuel 11 8 19 SUV 4x2 E-85 Flex-Fuel 3 0 3 SUV 4x4 E-85 Flex-Fuel 54 47 101 Minivan 4x2 (Passenger) E-85 Flex-Fuel 153 11 164 Minivan 4x2 (Cargo) E-85 Flex-Fuel 0 1 1 Van 4x2 (Passenger) E-85 Flex-Fuel 1 14 15 Van 4x2 (Cargo) E-85 Flex-Fuel 5 0 5 Pickup MD CNG Bi-Fuel 2 0 2 Pickup MD E-85 Flex-Fuel 1 69 70 Van MD (Passenger) CNG Bi-Fuel 13 0 13 Van MD (Cargo) CNG Bi-Fuel 2 0 2 Van MD (Cargo) CNG Dedicated 1 0 1 MD 8,501-16,000 GVWR Electric Dedicated 0 1 1 Total Number of AFV Acquisitions 858 467 1,325 Zero Emission Vehicle Credits 0 0 0 Dedicated Light-Duty AFV Credits 0 0 0 Dedicated Medium-Duty AFV Credits 2 2 4 Dedicated Heavy-Duty AFV Credits 0 0 0 Biodiesel Fuel Usage Credits - Planned 0 0 570 Total AFV Acquisitions with Credits 860 469 1,899 AFV Percentage of Covered Light-Duty Vehicle Acquisition 125 % 9

Appendix C Department of Air Force Complex-Wide AFV Report 2009 - Projected Projected Department of Air Force FY 2009 Vehicle Acquisitions Projected FY 2009 Light-Duty Vehicle Acquisitions Leased Purchased Total Total number of Light-Duty (8,500 GVWR) - Vehicle Acquisitions 1,820 202 2,022 Fleet Size 0 0 0 Geographic 0 0 0 Exemptions Law Enforcement 85 12 97 Non-MSA Operation (fleet) 0 0 0 Non-MSA Operation (vehicles) 1,132 24 1,156 EPACT Covered Acquisitions 603 166 769 Projected FY 2009 AFV Acquisitions Vehicle Leased Purchased Total Sedan E-85 Flex-Fuel Compact 352 0 352 Sedan E-85 Flex-Fuel Midsize 33 0 33 Pickup 4x2 CNG Bi-Fuel 12 0 12 Pickup 4x2 E-85 Flex-Fuel 207 132 339 Pickup 4x4 CNG Bi-Fuel 7 0 7 Pickup 4x4 E-85 Flex-Fuel 26 7 33 SUV 4x2 E-85 Flex-Fuel 1 12 13 SUV 4x4 E-85 Flex-Fuel 57 5 62 Minivan 4x2 (Passenger) E-85 Flex-Fuel 134 0 134 Minivan 4x2 (Cargo) E-85 Flex-Fuel 2 0 2 Van 4x2 (Passenger) CNG Dedicated 6 0 6 Van 4x2 (Passenger) E-85 Flex-Fuel 5 8 13 Van 4x2 (Cargo) CNG Dedicated 3 0 3 Van 4x2 (Cargo) E-85 Flex-Fuel 0 3 3 Pickup MD CNG Bi-Fuel 2 0 2 Pickup MD E-85 Flex-Fuel 0 62 62 Van MD (Passenger) CNG Bi-Fuel 13 0 13 Van MD (Passenger) E-85 Flex-Fuel 0 8 8 Van MD (Cargo) CNG Bi-Fuel 13 0 13 Van MD (Cargo) CNG Dedicated 1 0 1 MD 8,501-16,000 GVWR E-85 Flex-Fuel 0 2 2 Total Number of AFV Acquisitions 874 239 1,113 Zero Emission Vehicle Credits 0 0 0 Dedicated Light-Duty AFV Credits 9 0 9 Dedicated Medium-Duty AFV Credits 2 0 2 Dedicated Heavy-Duty AFV Credits 0 0 0 Biodiesel Fuel Usage Credits - Projected 0 0 288 Total AFV Acquisitions with Credits 885 239 1,412 AFV Percentage of Covered Light-Duty Vehicle Acquisition 184 % 10