METODS OF MEASURING DISTRESS

Similar documents
Non-Destructive Pavement Testing at IDOT. LaDonna R. Rowden, P.E. Pavement Technology Engineer

Assessment of pavement damage

A Study on Correlation between International Roughness Index and Present Serviceability Rating

Assessment of pavement damage

Concrete Airport Pavement Workshop Right Choice, Right Now ACPA SE Chapter Hilton Atlanta Airport November 8, 2012

RSMS. RSMS is. Road Surface Management System. Road Surface Management Goals - CNHRPC. Road Surface Management Goals - Municipal

SMOOTH PAVEMENTS LAST LONGER! Diamond Grinding THE ULTIMATE QUESTION! Rigid Pavement Design Equation. Preventive Maintenance 2 Session 2 2-1

Assessing Pavement Rolling Resistance by FWD Time History Evaluation

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

REHABILITATION DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR HAUL ROADS ASSOCIATED WITH A WIND FARM DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SUBJECT NAME: HIGHWAY ENGINEERING

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

A Study on Overlay Design of Repeatedly Deteriorating Flexible Pavement

Lowering Pavement Evaluation Costs Using Big Data

Ride Smoothness Measurement and Specification Issues. Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Manager, Bureau of Research New Jersey Department of Transportation

RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CONSIDERATIONS. SWIFT 2013 Chris Olidis, P.Eng.

Falling Weight Deflectometer

Ride vibration & road condition

Round robin tests in the Netherlands

Non-contact Deflection Measurement at High Speed

Measuring Pavement Condition Data for a Long-term Pavement Performance Study on New Zealand Roads. D Brown

(2111) Digital Test Rolling REVISED 07/22/14 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP

PN 420-7/18/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

Young Researchers Seminar 2009

Skukuza Airport Airfield side Flexible Pavements: PCN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

THE USE OF PERFORMANCE METRICS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE

STUDY ON PERFORMANCE OF FLEXIBLE HIGHWAY PAVEMENTS Rokade S a *, Agarwal P K b and Shrivastava R c

HDM-4 Road Use Costs Model Documentation. Version February 2, The World Bank

SMOOTH MOVING - it's a measure of quality (1st of 3 articles) HMA = Smoothness

City of Vallejo Public Works Department

Evaluation of the Rolling Wheel Deflectometer (RWD) in Louisiana. John Ashley Horne Dr. Mostafa A Elseifi

Characterization of LTPP Pavements using Falling Weight Deflectometer

Fundamentals of Paving Smoothness

Managing the Maintenance of the Runway at Baghdad International Airport

ASSESSMENT AND EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF PAVEMENT SURFACE FRICTION. Shila Khanal, MASc.,P.Eng. Pavement Engineer

SECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

Data Collection Technology at ARRB Transport Research

The high-speed road deflection tester

Motorways, trunk and class 1 roads and heavily trafficked roads in urban areas (carrying more than 2000 vehicles per day) C All other sites 45

Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences

Impact of Overweight Traffic on Pavement Life Using WIM Data and Mechanistic- Empirical Pavement Analysis

LESSONS LEARNT FROM THE MEASUREMENT OF GRAVEL ROAD ROUGHNESS IN KWAZULU-NATAL

On Low Speed Problem in Road Smoothness Profiling. Vadim Peretroukhine Michael Nieminen. September 28,

SPECIFICATION FOR SKID RESISTANCE INVESTIGATION AND TREATMENT SELECTION

EFFECT OF PAVEMENT CONDITIONS ON FUEL CONSUMPTION, TIRE WEAR AND REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE COSTS

Case study on Carbon Fiber spring suspension for FORD ENDEVOUR THUNDER+

Design and Analysis of suspension system components

Wheel Load Scales WL 101. Operating Instructions

Status of the first experiment at the PaveLab

UNIT-1 PART:A. 3. (i) What are the requirements of an ideal highway alignment? Discuss briefly.

Improved Performance Evaluation of Road Pavements by Using Measured Tyre Loading. James Maina and Morris De Beer CSIR Built Environment, South Africa

Roadscanners Products for Intelligent Asset Management

Motor Vehicles Working Group (MVWG)

Assessing the Condition of the Irish Regional Road Network 2011/2012

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Last date for sending comments : 30 November 2011

PN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

Introduction to Seminar: Technical Content. Terms To Be Familiar With. Outline. 5. Garbage in, garbage out (6)

Wheeled Mobile Robots

3-D Laser Data Collection and Analysis of Road Surface Texture

College of Mechanical & Power Engineering Of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei Province, China

Outline. Terms To Be Familiar With (cont d) Terms To Be Familiar With. Deflectometer Equipment. Why are these two terms critical?

78th TRB 99 Session 440

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

Darwin-ME Status and Implementation Efforts_IAC09

Tire 16 inch 225/75R inch 255/60R 18

IMPACT REGISTER, INC. PRECISION BUILT RECORDERS SINCE 1914

Assignment 4:Rail Analysis and Stopping/Passing Distances

Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation

An Update on Smoothness Specifications at ODOT

HDM-3. Transportation systems Engineering, IIT Bombay 72

SHORT PAPER PCB OBLIQUE COLLISIONS ENGINEERING EQUATIONS, INPUT DATA AND MARC 1 APPLICATIONS. Dennis F. Andrews, Franco Gamero, Rudy Limpert

Topics. Hauling, Laydown and Compaction. Optional Release Agent Hauling Vehicles. Delivery 7/6/2010

Influence of Vehicle Speed on Dynamic Loads and Pavement Response

Accelerated Pavement Tester

Development of a Multibody Systems Model for Investigation of the Effects of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Powertrains on Vehicle Dynamics.

Identification of tyre lateral force characteristic from handling data and functional suspension model

Field Verification of Smoothness Requirements for Weigh-In-Motion Approaches

Seals Stretch Running Friction Friction Break-Out Friction. Build With The Best!

Skid against Curb simulation using Abaqus/Explicit

SUMMARY OF STANDARD K&C TESTS AND REPORTED RESULTS

The GK units differ from the LK units in that the springs of the GK units have a spring eye at the front.

ITEM 585 RIDE QUALITY FOR PAVEMENT SURFACES Description. Measure and evaluate the ride quality of pavement surfaces.

The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application

Pavement Management Index Values Development of a National Standard. Mr. Douglas Frith Mr. Dennis Morian

Procedure for assessing the performance of Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems in front-to-rear collisions

Vehicle Dynamic Simulation Using A Non-Linear Finite Element Simulation Program (LS-DYNA)

Cornering & Traction Test Rig MTS Flat-Trac IV CT plus

Analysis of Design of a Flexible Pavement with Cemented Base and Granular Subbase

MOVING PAVEMENT DEFLECTION TESTING MEASUREMENTS

Full Vehicle Durability Prediction Using Co-simulation Between Implicit & Explicit Finite Element Solvers

RATED CAPACITY PC - D28 TIDD PC25 RATED CAPACITY MANUAL PC - D28 OCTOBER 2013 REV A PC25

MnDOT s Experience with IRI Specifications

High speed friction measurement

Structural Considerations in Moving Mega Loads on Idaho Highways

ANALYZING THE DYNAMICS OF HIGH SPEED RAIL

Impact of Environment-Friendly Tires on Pavement Damage

Tech Tip: Trackside Tire Data

III B.Tech I Semester Supplementary Examinations, May/June

Transcription:

METODS OF MEASURING DISTRESS The pavement performance is largely defined by evaluation in the following categories: Roughness Surface distress Skid resistance Structural evaluation Deflection ROUGHNESS Pavement roughness is generally defined as an expression of irregularities in the pavement surface that adversely affect the ride quality of a vehicle (and thus the user). Roughness is an important pavement characteristic because it affects not only ride quality but also vehicle delay costs, fuel consumption and maintenance costs. Subjective measurement of Roughness Pavement Roughness can be measured subjectively or objectively. In subjective measurement, a set of road users can be asked to rate the riding quality on a 0-5 scale as shown below.

Present Serviceability Rating (as suggested by AASHTO on a scale of 0-5) can be worked out from these subjective ratings. Objective Measurement of Roughness In the objective measurement, the roughness is indicated in terms of cumulative measure of vertical displacements as recorded by a recording wheel due to the unevenness in the longitudinal profile of the road. This cumulative measure of ups and downs in road profile is termed as roughness index or unevenness index and is normally represented in m/km or mm/km. Roughness Measurement Equipment Following are the methods/equipment that can be used for computing roughness index. Rod and level survey A survey can provide an accurate measurement of the pavement profile. The use of surveys for large projects, however, is impractical and cost prohibitive. Dipstick profiler This instrument can record the pavement profile measurement very accurately. The device records 10 to 15 readings per minute. Software analysis provides a profile accurate to ± 0.127 mm. However, measurements by dipstic are time consuming and therefore, it is commonly used to measure a profile for calibration of more complex instruments. Profilographs Profilographs have a sensing wheel, mounted to provide for free vertical movement at the center of the frame. The deviation against a reference plane, established from the profilograph frame, is recorded on graph paper from the motion of the sensing wheel. Profilographs can detect very slight surface deviations or undulations up to about 6 m in length. However, they are not practical for network condition surveys due to slow speed. Response type road roughness meters (RTRRMs) These instruments provide indirect measure of longitudinal road profile. The RTRRMs measure the relative movement between the body of the automobile and the centre of the rear axle. The RTRRM measurements are sensitive to the type of tyre, tyre pressure, load, vehicle suspension system, speed of vehicle, etc. Because of such sensitivity they need to be calibrated when any of the above factors change significantly. The CRRI s fifth

wheel bump integrator that is normally used in India also falls in this category. The advantage of these RTRRMs is that they can record the road roughness at speeds up to 80 km/hr. Since no to RTRRMs are exactly alike, it is necessary to convert the measures (unevenness index) to a standard common international scale. To provide a common quantitative basis on which the different measures of roughness can be compared, the International Roughness Index (IRI) was developed by World Bank. The IRI summarises the longitudinal surface profile in the wheel path and is computed from surface elevation data collected by either topographic survey or a mechanical profilometer or a dipstick. IRI is reported in units of m/km. All the RTRRMs need to be calibrated by measuring the unevenness of a standard stretch for which IRI values are known. Profiling devices These devices very accurately can establish the longitudinal profile of a pavement by either using contact or non-contact sensor systems. The non-contact systems use laser/ultrasonic devices for mapping the road profile. These profilometers are expensive and are normally used to calibrate RTRRMs. Range of Roughness Values The following figure shows the range of IRI values for different pavements and the corresponding speeds.

There are several correlations between PSR and IRI. One of the correlations is presented here. PSR = 5e 0.26 ( IRI ) where, PSR = present serviceability rating IRI = international roughness index Indian Practice In India the roughness is measured using fifth wheel bump integrator (developed by CRRI) and is reported as Unevenness Index (UI) in mm/km. For arriving at IRI from UI values the bump integrator needs to be calibrated for specific set of parameters using dipstick profiler. A typical relationship between IRI (m/km) and UI (mm/km) is given as IRI = UI / 720 SURFACE DISTRESS Surface distress is any indication of poor or unfavorable pavement performance or signs of impending failure. The general surface distresses can be grouped under the following three broad groups. The distresses under each of the groups are also mentioned along with the unit of measurement in parentheses. Fracture Cracking (% area cracked) Distortion - localized settlements and depression (depth in mm), rutting (rut depth in mm) and shoving Disintegration - raveling, stripping, potholes and patching (% effected area or no of pot holes per km length) Surface distress is related to roughness (the more cracks, distortion and disintegration - the rougher the pavement will be) as well as structural integrity (surface distress can be a sign of impending or current structural problems).

Measures of distress can be either subjective or objective. A simple example of a subjective measurement may be rating of each type of defect based on visual inspection on a scale of 0-5 as Very Poor, Poor, Fair, Good and Very Good as in PSR. Objective measurements, which are generally more expensive to obtain, use different types of automated distress detection equipment. Older techniques, used teams of individuals who drove across every km of pavement to be measured. The measurements were made using simple instruments and by visual estimation. The rut depths were measured using straight edge and the area of cracking, patching, raveling, etc were visually estimated. Based on the objective measurements the Present Serviceability Index (PSI) could be obtained using the AASHTO equation. Current methods record pavement surface distresses using video imaging using a specially equipped van that is fitted with high-resolution cameras. The van can travel at the usual highway speeds. Evaluation is either done manually by playing the video back on specially designed workstations while trained crews rate the recorded road surface or automatically by computer image processing software. In more advanced Integrated Pavement Analysis Units, in addition to high resolution video cameras, other instruments such as non-contact (laser) profilometers for mapping longitudinal as well as transverse pavement profile, distance measuring instrument and computer workstations for processing the data are fitted. Automatic Road Analyser and Laser Road Surface Tester fall in this category. Using Integrated Pavement Analysis Units one can obtain the following measurements. Roughness Distress (cracking, rut depth) Gradients, camber, curvature Pavement texture The rating suggested by IRC in its guidelines for maintenance management of primary, secondary and urban roads is given in the following table.

Pavement Condition Rating Based on Different Types of Defects Defects Range of Distress Cracking (%) >30 21 to 30 11 to 20 5 to 10 <5 Ravelling (%) >30 11 to 30 6 to 10 1 to 5 0 Pothole (%) >1 0.6 to 1.0 Shoving (%) >1 0.6 to 1.0 0.1 to 0.5 0.1 to 0.5 0.10 0 0.10 0 Patch (%) >30 16 to 30 6 to 15 2 to 5 <2 Settlement and depression (%) >5 3 to 5 Up to 2 Up to 1 0 Rutting (mm) >50 21 to 50 11 to 20 5 to 10 <5 Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Condition Very Poor Poor Fair Good Very Good (Source: Guidelines for Maintenance Management of Primary, Secondary and Urban Roads, IRC, 2004) SKID RESISTANCE Skid resistance is the force developed when a tyre that is prevented from rotating slides along the pavement surface (Highway Research Board, 1972). Skid resistance is an important pavement evaluation parameter because inadequate skid resistance will lead to higher incidences of skid related accidents. Skid resistance depends on pavement surface texture. Skid resistance changes over time. Typically it increases in the first two years following construction as the roadway is worn away by traffic and rough aggregate surfaces become exposed, then decreases over the remaining pavement life as aggregates become more polished. Skid resistance is generally quantified using some form of friction measurement such as a friction factor or skid number. Friction factor (like a coefficient of friction): f = F/L

Skid number: SN = 100(f) where: F = frictional resistance to motion in plane of interface L = load perpendicular to interface Measurement Techniques Portable Pendulum Skid tester The locked wheel tester The spin up tester Pavement surface texture measurement Portable Pendulum Skid tester it is a dynamic pendulum impact type tester for measuring the resistance offered by a surface under test. It is used for measuring spot values of surface friction at representative locations. Though, it provides good information on the skid resistance of the pavement, it cannot provide data with different speeds. The locked wheel tester This method uses a locked wheel skidding along the tested surface to measure friction resistance. It is possible to measure skid resistance at different speeds in this method. The spin up tester A spin up tester has the same basic setup as a locked wheel tester but operates in an opposite manner. For a spin up tester, the vehicle (or trailer) is brought to the desired testing speed (typically 64 km/hr ) and a locked test wheel is lowered to the pavement surface. The test wheel braking system is then released and the test wheel is allowed to "spin up" to normal traveling speed due to its contact with the pavement. The friction force can be computed by knowing the test wheel's moment of inertia and its rotational acceleration. This avoids the use of costly force measuring equipment. Pavement surface texture measurement In this method the pavement skid resistance is correlated with the pavement macrotexture. By measuring the pavement texture and using the established correlation between the macrotexture and the skid resistance, the skid resistance is obtained.

DEFLECTION Pavement surface deflection measurements are the primary means of evaluating a flexible pavement structure. Although other measurements can be made that reflect (to some degree) a pavement's structural condition, surface deflection is an important pavement evaluation method because the magnitude and shape of pavement deflection is a function of traffic (type and volume), pavement structural section, temperature affecting the pavement structure and moisture affecting the pavement structure. Deflection measurements can be used in backcalculation methods to determine pavement structural layer stiffness and the subgrade resilient modulus. Furthermore, pavement deflection measurements are non-destructive destructive in nature which adds on to the overall viability of usage. Measurement Technique The pavement surface deflections can be measured using either static deflection equipment or impact load deflection devices. Static deflection equipment measure pavement deflection in response to a static load. Benkelman Beam falls in this category. Impact load devices deliver a transient impulse load to the pavement surface. The subsequent pavement response (deflection basin) is measured by a series of sensors. The most common type of equipment is the falling weight deflectometer (FWD). Benkelman Beam is a simple device that operates on the lever arm principle. The Benkelman Beam is used with a loaded truck - typically 80 kn on a single axle with dual tires inflated to 480 to 550 kpa. Measurement is made by placing the tip of the beam between the dual tires and measuring the pavement surface rebound as the truck is moved away. The Benkelman Beam is low cost but is also slow, labor intensive and does not provide a deflection basin. The procedure of measuring rebound deflection and finding the characteristic deflection using Benkelman Beam is documented in the following standard. IRC:81-1997 Guidelines for strengthening of flexible road pavements using Benkelman Beam deflection technique. Using the above standard one can design the overlays after arriving at the pavement characteristic rebound deflection.

Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) is an impact load device that delivers a transient impulse load to the pavement surface and the resulting pavement response (deflection basin) is measured by a series of sensors (geophones). Vertical deflection of the pavement in multiple locations is recorded by the geophones, which provides a more complete characterization of pavement deflection. The area of pavement deflection under and near the load application is collectively known as the "deflection basin". One of the advantages of FWD is that multiple tests can be performed on the same location using different weight drop heights. The advantage of FWD over BB is that it is quicker, the impact load can be easily varied and it more accurately simulates the standard loading of trucks, both with respect to time of application of the load as well as the magnitude of the load. Therefore, using FWD deflection data one can characterize the existing pavement layers in terms of their layer modulii using backcalculation procedures with the help of mechanistic structural models. Once the pavement layers are characterised in terms of their present resilient modulii, overlays can be designed using mechanistic procedures. The characteristics of important equipment for the pavement performance evaluation is documented in Guidelines for Maintenance Management of Primary, Secondary and Urban Roads, IRC, 2004. The same is provided in Table 12-A.1.

Name of Principal of Equipment Operation Benkelman Beam Elastic deflection under static load Falling Weight Deflectometer Loadman Automatic Road Analyser (ARAN) Laser Road Surface Tester (LRST) Table 12-A.1 Important Characteristics of Recommended Equipment for Data collection Elastic deflection under impulse load Elastic deflection under impulse load Continued images one forward and two straight down Measures slope profile in the time domain Output Rebound deflection at single point under load Deflection basin 200-300 stations per day Single point deflection Operating Speed Multiple Measurement Merits Limitations Recommendations Crawling NA Simple, quick, Single point Can be used for routine cheap deflection overlay requirements for all categories of roads NA Easy to Expensive Recommended for use operate on primary / secondary relatively fast, road network complete deflection profile is measured 80-100 stations per day Video tapes 30-100 kmph Distress unevenness IRI long, profile Upto 90 kmph NA Distress (Crack rut depth) profile, roughness, gradients, curveture, etc Distress rut depth, profile, macro texture Simple, portable Covers about 600 km a day with good accuracy Suitable for all weather condition Single point deflection Expensive, dry surface measurements, processing is manual Calibration needed daily for laser and accelerometer Recommended on thin pavements with smooth surfaces subject to good correlations with already established methods Recommended for use on primary / secondary road network with dry surface Recommended for all categories of roads

Towed fifth wheel bump integrator/vehicle mounted bump integrator DIPSTICK British Pendulum Skid Tester Mu Meter Static Weigh Pads Weigh-In-Motion Instrumented Car Response type measurement Measures vertical profile by slope measurements Measures lateral friction by swing action Measures side force coefficient Load measured through load cells/load bars Piezo electric sensors and capacitor type sensor Mesurement of upgrade downgrade and directional change of vehicle Table 12-A.1 Contd. Unevenness index 30 kmph NA Simple, Can not Reliable data measure profile collection needs frequent calibration International roughness index(iri) Slow walking NA Measures true profile Skid resistance Very slow NA Simple, portable Friction value Upto 150 kmph NA Requires little traffic control Static loads Normal NA Any traffic conditions Weights of moving vehicles Cumulative rise/fall curvature Normal Speed, vehicle type 32 kmph Unevenness, gradients, curves Traffic is not interrupted during studies Very slow Noting and recording manual spots measurements only Ineffective in winter, sharp curves and steepgrades Vehicles need to be stopped and aligned Proper calibration checks are required Capturing of Low speed, more sudden jerks parameters in adversely effect single run the Recommended for all categories of roads Recommended for more accurate surface profile measurements and for calibration of response type equipments( towed / vehicle mounted bump integrators) Recommended for all categories of roads Recommended for primary roads Recommended for medium and low traffic loads Recommended for primary / secondary roads with smooth surfaces, steel rimed tyres should be avoided Recommended for all categories of roads