NCDOT Rideability and IRI Special Provision. Nilesh Neel Surti, PE North Carolina DOT State Pavement Construction Engineer

Similar documents
MnDOT s Experience with IRI Specifications

An Update on Smoothness Specifications at ODOT

DESCRIPTION This work consists of measuring the smoothness of the final concrete or bituminous surface.

ITEM 585 RIDE QUALITY FOR PAVEMENT SURFACES Description. Measure and evaluate the ride quality of pavement surfaces.

Table Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files

SECTIO N 610 PAVEMENT SMO O THNESS

Section 6. Ride Specification Special Provisions Step-by-Step Ride Guide for Inspectors and Project Engineers

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Asphalt Pavement Construction Update

Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation

Control of Pavement Smoothness in Kansas

DIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS

PN 420-7/18/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

PN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (IRI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Smoothness Specification Update

SECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

Research Update Construction Conference Charles Holzschuher, P.E. February 3, Florida Department of Transportation

a road is neither cheap nor fast.

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

Profiler Certification Process at the Virginia Smart Road

Ride Smoothness Measurement and Specification Issues. Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Manager, Bureau of Research New Jersey Department of Transportation

RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CONSIDERATIONS. SWIFT 2013 Chris Olidis, P.Eng.

Asphalt Technician Certification Program

THE USE OF PERFORMANCE METRICS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE

DEVELOPMENT OF PROFILER- BASED RIDEABILITY SPECIFICATIONS FOR ASPHALT PAVEMENTS AND ASPHALT OVERLAYS

SMOOTH PAVEMENTS LAST LONGER! Diamond Grinding THE ULTIMATE QUESTION! Rigid Pavement Design Equation. Preventive Maintenance 2 Session 2 2-1

Profiler Certification Program at the NCAT Pavement Test Track. R. Buzz Powell Jason Nelson

Median Barriers in North Carolina

FIGURE 15. MANUAL RUT DEPTH

Work Zone Safety & New Interstate Resurfacing Provision

Created by: St. Louis County

EFFECT OF PAVEMENT CONDITIONS ON FUEL CONSUMPTION, TIRE WEAR AND REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE COSTS

Presentation Outline. TRB MEPDG Workshop. Traffic Data & WIM Program. WIM Program in WIM program (prior to MEPDG) Utilizing WIM data

RUTGERS PAVEMENT RESOURCE CENTER RIDE QUALITY TOOLS

Florida s Turnpike Enterprise High Tension Median Cable Barrier Pilot Project. William H. Cook, P.E. Florida s Turnpike Assistant Roadway Engineer

If it ain t broke, don t t fix it. HMA Thin Lifts for Pavement Preservation in Tennessee 2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA

CSG National Conference Nashville

Work Zone Safety Initiatives and Research Efforts. Irene Soria Safety Evaluation Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation Safety Engineering

SMOOTH MOVING - it's a measure of quality (1st of 3 articles) HMA = Smoothness

West Virginia Department of Transportation Division of Highways

Evaluation of Grind and Groove (Next Generation Concrete Surface) Pilot Projects in California

STATE ND PROJECT NO. CP 0883 (14) & CP 1152 (14) SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 9 31 SIGN NUMBER SIGN SIZE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT REQUIRED UNITS PER AMOUNT UNITS

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

Surveys consistently show that smoothness is. Smooth Going How new technology is changing quest for smooth pavements !"#$!"#$%"$

Non-Destructive Pavement Testing at IDOT. LaDonna R. Rowden, P.E. Pavement Technology Engineer

Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Burlington, Vermont. Rhode Island DOT

Field Verification of Smoothness Requirements for Weigh-In-Motion Approaches

Louisiana s s Work Zone Task Force Work Zone Improvements

NCDOT Report on Improving Safety on Secondary Roads

Summary of Pavement Smoothness Specifications in Canada and Around the World

Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2003/8 EVALUATION OF INDOT CONSTRUCTION SMOOTHNESS SPECIFICATIONS

Implementation of AASHTO s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016

MoDOT TECHNICIAN QUALIFICATION MANUAL For PROFILOGRAPH OPERATORS. Table of Contents. Profilograph Example (Pay Calculation)

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

Pavement Surface Properties Consortium Phase II (TPF-5[345])

3-D Laser Data Collection and Analysis of Road Surface Texture

Lowering Pavement Evaluation Costs Using Big Data

Maintaining Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity

LaDOTD s s New Traffic Control Details

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2000/23. Final Report. Sedat Gulen John Nagle John Weaver Victor Gallivan

On Low Speed Problem in Road Smoothness Profiling. Vadim Peretroukhine Michael Nieminen. September 28,

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Page 1 of KA

Measuring Pavement Condition Data for a Long-term Pavement Performance Study on New Zealand Roads. D Brown

s Contact the Area Construction Engineer at for RAP sample location. Page 2 of 10

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. June Dear Customer:

mileage fees primer vmt fees are in your future

Evaluation of the Rolling Wheel Deflectometer (RWD) in Louisiana. John Ashley Horne Dr. Mostafa A Elseifi

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017

I.D.O.T. Update Version -

Measurement of Tire/Pavement Noise

US 70 Corridor Planning for the Future

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY

Wet Accident Reduction Program (WARP) in Virginia. Bipad Saha, P.E. Pavement Design Engineer

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 603 SIGNS

2013 Changes to the 2011 MMUTCD, Part 6 September 2013

Willamette River Transit Bridge. Portland - Milwaukie Light Rail Willamette River Bridge Willamette River Bridge Advisory Committee

MEMORANDUM FPN: State Road: 91 County: Osceola (92)

D-25 Speed Advisory System

I-4 Beyond the Ultimate. Florida Transportation Builders Association January 18, 2019

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL & INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM

Rehabilitated PCC Surface Characteristics

Load Rating for SHVs and EVs

SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE PAVEMENT PROJECTS 2015 TxAPA Annual Meeting September 23, 2015 Austin District Mike Arellano, P.E. Date

Right-of-Way Obstruction Permit Fee Structure Minneapolis Department of Public Works May 10, 2001

(2111) Digital Test Rolling REVISED 07/22/14 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP

Work Zone Changes Since We Last Met 2016 Louisiana Transportation Conference. Barry L. Lacy, P.E. Work Zone/Claims/Audit Engineer

CHANGE LIST for MDOT Traffic and Safety Geometric Design Guides. May 23, 2017: The following update was made to the web site.

MN Roads Low Volume Road Testing to Validate the Purdue TPTA Textures and Predicted Joint Effects

Purdue Road School West Lafayette IN

RhodeWorks Initiative

Purpose of Tonight s Meeting

Fundamentals of Paving Smoothness

The Evolution of Transportation Technology in an Increasingly Smart Society. Presented by: Matthew J. Schiemer, PE September 12, 2017

RESIDENTIAL WASTE HAULING ASSESSMENT SERVICES. January 10, 2011 Presentation to Arvada City Council

Round robin tests in the Netherlands

The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application

2018 NDACE CONFERENCE

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

Transcription:

NCDOT Rideability and IRI Special Provision Nilesh Neel Surti, PE North Carolina DOT State Pavement Construction Engineer RPUG 2011

NCDOT - Ride Quality Background Fall 1995 Rideability addressed in Asphalt QA/QC Program National Highway User s survey in 1996 indicated that nationwide pavement conditions were the No. 1 concern of traveling public Rideability Specification developed for 5 projects let in Nov. 1996 Full implementation considered for 1997 Pavement Smoothness Task force was established June 2005 Memo on Rideability (still an issue) Rideability Group was established with Industry Reps.

NCDOT - Ride Quality Background Final Surface Testing SP (2 or more lifts of asphalt, 45 mph, 1000 ) Hearne Straightedge Asphalt Pavement Rainhart Profilograph Concrete Pavement

Hearne Straightedge developed in NC by Tom Hearne

Hearne is a 10-ft rolling straightedge pushed at 2 mph

Graph produced by Hearne Straightedge

Bump meter taken in one wheel path

Rainhart profilograph for concrete pavements and bridges

Rainhart is 29-ft rolling profilograph pushed at 2 mph

Measuring smoothness on graphical scale

Rainhart profilograph for concrete pavements and bridges Profile Index (PI) averaged over 29-foot length and across a 44-inch wide path Every wheel path is measured No incentives / disincentives Corrective action usually diamond grinding

Feedback and issues with profilographs These contraptions are slow (2 mph) Can take multiple runs to complete Traffic control issues (lane closures) Results are subjective (graphs on paper) Not a true profile of roadway

Fast forward to 2011 What is IRI? International Roughness Index Pavement smoothness measured with Laser Profiler mounted on a vehicle (Units = in/mile) Golf carts Vehicles < 30 mph SUVs and vans Vehicles up to 70 mph

Laser Profiler Set Up NCDOT Pavement Management Unit has profiler equipment and has been measuring IRI for years on our Interstates PMU has 4 profilers (Single 5-Pt lasers can go to 7) 2 DynaTest and 2 ICC

Liner laser technology RoLine and TriODS sensors mounted on lightweight profiler.

NC Turnpike Authority - IRI Special Provision NCTA had an IRI spec on WWF and Monroe projects NCTA used 65 in/mile on asphalt and 75 in/mile on concrete NCTA has hired Consultant to perform IRI testing

NCDOT - IRI Special Provision 2008 NCDOT had pilot project w/ Percent Improvement SP 2011 - NCDOT developed draft IRI Spec Reconvened Rideability group for asphalt Formed Rigid Pavement Committee for concrete Received Industry input on draft IRI spec Intent - Use IRI spec for new location construction (Bypass projects are ideal)

NCDOT IRI Special Provisions details For asphalt, still include Hearne as an option For concrete, convert to IRI in 2012 Spec Book Contractor performs smoothness testing or hires a firm In 2010, AASHTO documents on Inertial profilers and systems were updated and finalized Need calibrated profiler and trained, competent personnel using the system Use low-speed or high-speed profiler Run profiler on both wheel paths at same time Will allow separate runs one per each wheel path

NCDOT SP requires use of line laser technology

Liner laser technology PaveMetrics LCMS with Accelorometer to collect IRI values

NCDOT More details on IRI Special Provision Data provided to RE after each run on approved media (CD, DVD, flash drive) DOT will analyze raw data on FHWA ProVAL software DOT can do QA to verify data with PMU profilers Contractor provides results report - 10 days after completion of smoothness testing IRI numbers for 0.10-mile sections (MRI is average of IRI numbers from both wheel paths) NCDOT Same numbers for both pavement types w/ acceptance range from 55-70 Pay Adjustment continuous formulas

NCDOT Pay Adjustment Chart Price adjusted based on MRI numbers per lane 45.0 or under PA = $200 per 0.10 mile 45.1 to 55.0 PA = 600 (10*MRI) 55.1 to 70.0 Acceptable (No PA) 70.1 to 90.0 PA = 650 (10*MRI) Over 90.1 Corrective Action Required Corrective action must be approved by RE Areas of Localized roughness (>125.0 in 25 )

What s next??? Implementation on projects in 2012 Bumps in the road as we learn and use laser profilers Resurfacing projects Different Specification (Future) Goal will be to develop a Percent Improvement SP (Similar to chart such as SCDOT) Bridge IRI Special Provision Oregon Inlet bridge = 3 miles in length

GO WOLFPACK!!! & BLACKJACK!!!??? Any QUESTIONS??? Nilesh Surti, PE RPUG 2011 NCDOT Construction Unit nsurti@ncdot.gov Cell: (919) 909-6493