TEG th May th Flex-TEG Meeting JAMA-JARI

Similar documents
FlexPLI Round Robin Testing

Update on Pedestrian Leg Testing

Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor. Flex GTR Evaluation Tests

Update on Pedestrian Leg Testing

Flex-GTR: Comparison of Test Results from Prototype and Series Production Legforms. - BASt / ACEA joint project, November

Flex GT Testing of US Vehicles

Robustness of SN04 prototype test results

Flex PLI Logbook for the IG GTR9-PH2 Round Robin Tests. Please return to: or fax-no

Design Freeze Status. FLEX-PLI-GTR Development Instrumentation and Electrical Design

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION

JARI Research Activities for Traffic Safety

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL VULNERABLE ROAD USER PROTECTION

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION

SAFETY ENHANCED INNOVATIONS FOR OLDER ROAD USERS. EUROPEAN COMMISSION EIGHTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME HORIZON 2020 GA No

JAMA/JARI Evaluation Tests of

Pedestrian Protection Large Truck/SUV Challenges

BEYOND SAFETY LEGISLATION: CONTRIBUTION OF CONSUMER INFORMATION

Survey on Safety of New Mobility Vehicles

SAFETY ENHANCED INNOVATIONS FOR OLDER ROAD USERS. EUROPEAN COMMISSION EIGHTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME HORIZON 2020 GA No

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.126/Rev.1 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.126/Rev.1

Crash Simulation in Pedestrian Protection

COMPONENT LEG TESTING OF VEHICLE FRONT STRUCTURES

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC)

Virtual human body model for fast safety assessment

Pedestrian Safety. Bumper Test Area

Pedestrian protection in vehicle impacts: Further results from the Australian New Car Assessment Program

SAFETY ENHANCED INNOVATIONS FOR OLDER ROAD USERS. EUROPEAN COMMISSION EIGHTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME HORIZON 2020 GA No

Humanetics is now shipping all ATDs for use in the U.S. NCAP at SBL-A and also offers upgrade kits for previously delivered dummies.

AMENDMENT NO December 2015 To AIS-100

INFLUENCE OF BUMPER DESIGN TO LOWER LEG IMPACT RESPONSE

A study on the feasibility of measures relating to the protection of pedestrians and other vulnerable road users

MULTIBODY ANALYSIS OF THE M-346 PILOTS INCEPTORS MECHANICAL CIRCUITS INTRODUCTION

INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF TARGET POPULATION FOR POTENTIAL REDUCTION OF PEDESTRIAN HEAD INJURY IN THE UNITED STATES: An Estimate Based on PCDS Cases

Analysis of a Frontal Impact of a Formula SAE Vehicle David Rising Jason Kane Nick Vernon Joseph Adkins Dr. Craig Hoff Dr. Janet Brelin-Fornari

ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2014/15 Rev.1

Full Width Test ECE-R 94 Evaluation of test data Proposal for injury criteria Way forward

EEVC WG12 Rear Impact Biofidelity Evaluation Programme

Proposal of an Electromagnetic Actuator for Prosthetic Knee Joints

GT-Suite Users International Conference Frankfurt a.m., October 22 nd 2012

OVERVIEW: KIT INCLUDES:

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.126 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.126

Model Contest Judging: Eliminating the Mystery. Sunrise Division 02 Rocky Mountain Region National Model Railroad Association

Early Stage Vehicle Concept Design with GT-SUITE

Applications & Products Overview for Automobile Testing

Proposal for a Modification of the Bumper Test Area for Lower and Upper Legform to Bumper Tests

Deflection of Deployable Bonnets in DB Systems

1 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 2 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 3 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 4 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 5 NRG #40 Anem. m/s 6 NRG #40 Anem. m/s. 30 m. 40 m. 30 m. m/s.

Service Bulletin A

LEG PROTECTION FOR MOTORCYCLISTS. B. P. Chinn T.R.R.L. M.A. Macaulay Brunel University

Stratasys DDM Group Dynamic Flex Test Report

OVERVIEW: KIT INCLUDES:

POWR Series. Performance and Steerable Drilling Motors

Side impact protection in non-integral CRS First feedback on 440 mm. 52 nd Meeting of the UN Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems

THUMS User Community

Validation of a FAST Model of the Statoil- Hywind Demo Floating Wind Turbine

Technical Bulletin. Proposed Pedestrian Grid Procedure - Data Collection. Version 1.0. November 2010 TB 010 TB010-1

Bistable Rotary Solenoid

Small Overlap Frontal Crashworthiness Evaluation Rating Protocol (Version II)

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF PROPERTIES OF HYDRAULIC DRIVE FOR VALVES OF INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES

Benefits for Australia of the introduction of an ADR on pedestrian protection. RWG Anderson, G Ponte, D Searson

The Fleming s Left Hand Rule shows what happens when electrons in a current enter a magnetic field.

A Predictive Delay Fault Avoidance Scheme for Coarse Grained Reconfigurable Architecture

Small Overlap Frontal Crashworthiness Evaluation

Ride Custom Systems Face Sheet :~)

Lifting Points. Lifting Points Information 3:2. Rotating Eye Lifting Point - RELP 3:4. Rotating Lifting Point - RLP 3:5

Rodless cylinders. Series General. Construction characteristics. Technical characteristics. Use and maintenance

Small Overlap Frontal Crashworthiness Evaluation

ACOCAR active suspension

Description Product group Rod seal

Composite Long Shaft Coupling Design for Cooling Towers

Application of the SuperGen Electro-Mechanical Supercharger to Miller-Cycle Gasoline Turbocharged Engines

Economic and Social Council

Offshore Application of the Flywheel Energy Storage. Final report

Lifting Points Rotating Ball-bearing De-centered Weldable Screw-on

Performance as Test Procedures of the PDB and ODB Tests for a Mini-Car

CLIENT PROJECT REPORT

oééçêí=çå=cáåçáåöë= OMNUMOMP=Ó=N^== - english version - Truncated version dated 12 th July 2018

汽车对行人的碰撞保护 The Protection of Motor Vehicle for Pedestrians in the Event of a Collision

AERODYNAMIC STABILITY OF A SUPER LONG-SPAN BRIDGE WITH SLOTTED BOX GIRDER

Spur gearing, Helical gearing [mm/iso] Pinion Gear ii Project information? i Calculation without errors.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Reli-a-Flex TM Reliance

Sandwich nozzle hot test on Vulcain 2 engine.

Sousuke Sasaki, Yoshio Tonegawa Japan Automobile Research Institute. 17th August th International ETH-Conference on JARI

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Efficient and Effective bearing performance evaluation

FLAT BIO END CAP TEST REPORT

1 of 2 5/25/17, 4:57 PM

The Planetary Motor Design and control of a novel multi-rotor structure

Installation instructions, accessories. Body kit

Method Development for Evaluating Wheelchair Seating System (WCSS) Crashworthiness using FMVSS-207 Testing

INTELLIGENT ACTIVE ROLL CONTROL SHAUN TATE

Vehicle Safety Research in TGGS

A Total Solution for Automotive Helical Spring Design

Case Study on On EHV Circuit Breaker Flashover NTPC-SINGRAULI

250V 24V, 30V, 48V, 100 / 110V, 125V, 200 / 220V DC. 11mA. 2,000V AC / 1min. ±4.5kV, 3 times for each pole (1.2 / 50μs)

Plié 2.0 MPC Knee CMS Numerical Coding Recommendations and Justifications

SYSTEM # Installation Instructions for: MOPAR CARS 6.4L Engine REV 06/12/17

Annex D DRIVING COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT

Simulated EV Dynamics: Safety & etvc

Transcription:

TEG-87 19 th May 29 8 th Flex-TEG Meeting JAMA-JARI Technical Evaluation Tests for the Flex-GTR-prototype Comparability of the Flex-GTR-proto output under the symmetric right and left bumper corner impact 1

Back Grounds In the Flex-GT tests, incomparable test results were obtained under the symmetric right and left bumper corner impact because of the asymmetric structure of the knee joint. In the Flex-GTR-prototype development, knee joint was developed by having symmetric structure. JAMA/JARI therefore conducted symmetric right and left bumper corner impact tests using the Flex-GTR-prototype in order to check the comparability of the test results. 2

Test Test Rigs Simplified Car: Type 2 (Photo: Overview) Type 2-R Right bumper corner Type 2-L Left bumper corner BLE BLE BP BP SP SP 3 deg. 3 deg. BLE: Bonnet leading edge BP: Bumper SP: Spoiler 3

Test Test Rigs, contd. Simplified Car: Type 2 Cross Sectional Dimensions align with the Car Center Line Vertical (mm) 12 1 8 H1 = 8 mm H2 = 525 mm H3 = 3 mm L1 = 18 mm BLE: Bonnet leading edge BP: Bumper, SP: Spoiler BLE ( t =.6 mm ) H1 6 BP ( t =.8 mm ) 4 H2 SP ( t =.8 mm ) 2 H3 L2 (3 mm) Ground level -4-2 2 4 6 8 Horizontal (mm) 4

Test Test Rigs, contd. Simplified Car: Type 2 (Photo: After test) Type 2-R Right bumper corner Type 2-L Left bumper corner BLE BLE BP BP SP SP BLE: Bonnet leading edge BP: Bumper SP: Spoiler 5

Impact Condition Vertical (mm) 12 1 8 Impact Speed 11.1 ±.2 m/s Flex-GTR-proto Simplified Car (Type 2) Side view (image) 6 BP 4 2 Impact Height 75 ± 1 mm Ground Level Temperature 2 ± 4 deg. Celsius Relative Humidity 4 ± 3 % -4-2 2 4 6 8 Horizontal (mm) 6

Impact Condition, contd. Flex-GTR-proto Top view (image) Horizontal Location ± 1 mm Impact direction Simplified car center line BP Simplified Car (Type 2-R) Horizontal Location ± 1 mm Flex-GTR-proto Impact direction BP Simplified Car (Type 2-L) Simplified car center line BP: Bumper 7

Test Test Matrix Test ID S8 S9 S1 S11 Impactor Simplified Car DAS Type SN Type Flex-GTR-proto SN3 SLICE Type 2-L Type 2-R Comparability of the Flex-GTR-proto output under the symmetric right and left bumper corner impact 8

Test Test Results 9

Kinematics (Flex-GTR-prototype, L and R Bumper Corner Impact) Flex-GTR-proto. (SN3), S8 Simplified Car (Type 2-L) Simplified Car Type 2-L Flex-GTR-proto. (SN3), S9 Simplified Car (Type 2-L) Simplified Car Type 2-R Flex-GTR-proto. (SN3), S1 Simplified Car (Type 2-R) Inversed Images Flex-GTR-proto. (SN3), S11 Simplified Car (Type 2-R) Inversed Images ms 1 ms 2 ms 3 ms 4 ms 1

Waveforms (Flex-GTR-prototype, L and R Bumper Corner Impact) Tibia-1 Tibia-2 Tibia-3 Tibia-4 Bending moment (Nm) Bending moment (Nm) 5 Tibia-1 4 3 2 1-1 -2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Time (ms) 5 Tibia-2 4 3 2 1-1 -2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Time (ms) Bending moment (Nm) Bending moment (Nm) Flex-GTR-proto.(SN3), Simplified Car (Type 2-L), S8 Flex-GTR-proto.(SN3), Simplified Car (Type 2-L), S9 Flex-GTR-proto.(SN3), Simplified Car (Type 2-R), S1 Flex-GTR-proto.(SN3), Simplified Car (Type 2-R), S11 5 Tibia-3 4 3 2 1-1 -2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Time (ms) 5 Tibia-4 4 3 2 1-1 -2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Time (ms) Knee-ACL Knee-PCL Knee-MCL Elongation (mm) Elongation (mm) 3 Knee-ACL 25 2 15 1 5-5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Time (ms) 3 Knee-PCL 25 2 15 1 5-5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Time (ms) Elongation (mm) 3 25 2 15 1 5-5 Knee-MCL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Time (ms) Flex-GTR-proto.(SN3), Simplified Car (Type 2-L), S8 Flex-GTR-proto.(SN3), Simplified Car (Type 2-L), S9 Flex-GTR-proto.(SN3), Simplified Car (Type 2-R), S1 Flex-GTR-proto.(SN3), Simplified Car (Type 2-R), S11 11

Maximum Values (Flex-GTR-prototype, L and R Bumper Corner Impact) Comparability Check for Flex-GTR-prototype (SN3) Under Right and Left Bumper Corner Impact Test Method: Subsystem (Free fright) Test Rig: Simplified Car Max. values** Tibia-1 Tibia-2 Tibia-3 Tibia-4 Knee-ACL Knee-PCL Knee-MCL (Nm) (Nm) (Nm) (Nm) (mm) (mm) (mm) Simplified Car (Type 2-L) Flex-GTR-prot. (SN3), S8 273.7 269.6 269.8 139.5 11.61 8.18 19.3 Flex-GTR-prot. (SN3), S9 282.1 28. 281.1 149.2 12.11 7.72 18.8 avg. 277.9 274.8 275.5 144.3 11.9 8. 19.1 Simplified Car (Type 2-R) Flex-GTR-prot. (SN3), S1 285.6 281.5 278.7 146.5 11.81 7.38 19.8 Flex-GTR-prot. (SN3), S11 285.6 281.5 278.7 146.5 11.81 7.38 19.8 avg. 285.6 281.5 278.7 146.5 11.8 7.4 19.8 Injury Assessment Items Monitoring Items Simplified Car (Type 2-L) Flex-GTR-prot. (SN3), S8 Flex-GTR-prot. (SN3), S9 Simplified Car (Type 2-R) Flex-GTR-prot. (SN3), S1 Flex-GTR-prot. (SN3), S11 Bending Moment - Max. (Nm) 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Tibia-1 Tibia-2 Tibia-3 Tibia-4 Elongation - Max. (mm) 32 28 24 2 16 12 8 4 Knee-ACL Knee-PCL Knee-MCL 12

Maximum Values (Flex-GTR-prototype, L and R Bumper Corner Impact) Comparability Check for Flex-GTR-prototype (SN3) Under Right and Left Bumper Corner Impact Test Method: Subsystem (Free fright) Test Rig: Simplified Car Max. values** Tibia-1 Tibia-2 Tibia-3 Tibia-4 Knee-ACL Knee-PCL Knee-MCL (Nm) (Nm) (Nm) (Nm) (mm) (mm) (mm) Simplified Car (Type 2-L), Avg. 277.9 274.8 275.5 144.3 11.86 7.95 19.1 Simplified Car (Type 2-R), Avg 285.6 281.5 278.7 146.5 11.81 7.38 19.8 Avg. 281.8 278.1 277.1 145.4 11.84 7.67 19.42 St. Dev. 5.42 4.77 2.3 1.55.4.4.49 CV (%) 1.92 1.72.83 1.6.3 5.26 2.51 Judgement Good Good Good Good Good Acceptable Good t-iarv* 318 318 318 318 12.7 12.7 2. St.Dev./t-IARV (%) 1.7 1.5.72.49.28 3.17 2.44 Judgement Good Good Good Good Good Acceptable Good * t-iarv: Tentative Injury Assessment Reference Values ** Injury assessement items and monitoring items were evaluated. Injury Assessment Items Monitoring Items Judgements Good: < 3% Acceptable: 3% and < 7% Marginal: 7% and < 1% Not Acceptable: > 1% 13

Conclusions JAMA/JARI conducted symmetric right and left bumper corner impact tests using the Flex-GTR-prototype. As a results, we observed comparable test results of the Flex-GTR prototype under the symmetric right and left bumper corner impact. This results means, no concerns of the Flex-GTR-prototype for to use the symmetric right and left bumper corner impact tests. 14