TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY Escondido, California June 25, 2015 LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 Prepared by: Pedram Massoudi Transportation Engineer II Under the Supervision of: John Boarman, P.E. Principal
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Westminster Seminary Project (Project) proposes the development of 72 graduate housing units on 9.7 acres. The Project site is located on the east side of Bear Valley Parkway of Boyle Avenue in the City of Escondido. The project study area includes five intersections and six roadway street segments. The traffic analyses for the project were conducted in accordance with the City of Escondido s Traffic Impact Study Guidelines. The following scenarios are evaluated in this report: Existing Existing + Project Existing + Cumulative Projects Existing + Project + Cumulative Projects Buildout (Year 2035) without Project Buildout (Year 2035) with Project The project traffic generation calculations were conducted using the trip generation rates published in the SANDAG s Not so Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for San Diego Region (April 2002). The project is calculated to generate 216 daily trips with 17 trips (3 inbound/14 outbound) in AM peak hour and 19 trips (13 inbound/6 outbound) during PM peak hour. LLG applied engineering judgment based on existing traffic flows, intersection controls and roadway characteristics to determine the distribution of traffic among the nearby intersections. Cumulative projects were accounted for based on research conducted by LLG within the City of Escondido and County of San Diego to identify if any potential discretionary projects could be included for analysis. Based on the research conducted, three (3) cumulative projects were included in this study. Per the City of Escondido significance thresholds and the analysis methodologies presented in this report, Project-related and cumulative traffic are calculated to cause no significant impact on the study area intersections and segments. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 i Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 Project Description... 2 2.1 Project Location... 2 2.2 Project Description... 2 2.3 Project Access... 2 3.0 Existing Conditions... 6 3.1 Existing Transportation Conditions... 6 3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes... 7 4.0 Analysis Approach and Methodology... 12 5.0 Significance Criteria... 15 5.1 City of Escondido... 15 6.0 Analysis of Existing Conditions... 16 6.1 Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service... 16 6.2 Daily Street Segment Levels of Service... 17 7.0 Trip Generation/Distribution/Assignment... 18 7.1 Trip Generation... 18 7.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment... 18 8.0 Cumulative Traffic Volumes... 23 9.0 Analysis of Near-Term Scenarios... 27 9.1 Existing + Project... 27 9.1.1 Intersection Analysis... 27 9.1.2 Segment Operations... 27 9.2 Existing + Cumulative Growth... 27 9.2.1 Intersection Analysis... 27 9.2.2 Segment Operations... 27 9.3 Existing + Project + Cumulative Growth... 27 9.3.1 Intersection Analysis... 27 9.3.2 Segment Operations... 28 10.0 Analysis of Buildout Scenario... 31 10.1 Buildout... 31 10.2 Buildout + Project... 31 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 ii Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
11.0 Project Access... 35 12.0 Significance of Impacts and Mitigation Measures... 36 APPENDIX APPENDICES A. Intersection and Segment Manual Count Sheets B. Intersection Methodology and Near-Term Analysis Sheets C. City of Escondido Roadway Classification Table LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 iii Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
LIST OF FIGURES SECTION FIGURE # FOLLOWING PAGE Figure 2 1 Vicinity Map... 3 Figure 2 2 Project Area Map... 4 Figure 2 3 Site Plan... 5 Figure 3 1 Existing Conditions Diagram... 9 Figure 3 2 Post Bear Valley Project Construction Conditions Diagram... 10 Figure 3 3 Existing Traffic Volumes... 11 Figure 7 1 Project Traffic Distribution... 20 Figure 7 2 Project Traffic Volumes... 21 Figure 7 3 Existing + Project Traffic Volumes... 22 Figure 8 1 Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes... 24 Figure 8 2 Existing + Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes... 25 Figure 8 3 Existing + Project + Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes... 26 Figure 10 1 Year 2035 Traffic Volumes... 33 Figure 10 2 Year 2035 + Project Traffic Volumes... 34 LIST OF TABLES SECTION TABLE # PAGE Table 3 1 Existing Traffic Volumes... 8 Table 4 1 Traffic Impact Analysis ADT Thresholds for Roadway Segments... 13 Table 4 2 Traffic Impact Analysis ADT Thresholds for Intersections... 13 Table 5 1 City of Escondido Traffic Impact Significance Thresholds... 15 Table 6 1 Existing Intersection Operations... 16 Table 6 2 Post Bear Valley Project Street Segment Operations... 17 Table 7 1 Project Trip Generation... 18 Table 9-1 Near-Term Intersection Operations... 29 Table 9-2 Near-Term Street Segment Operations Post Bear Valley Widening Project Constructio. 30 Table 10 1 Buildout Street Segment Operations... 32 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 iv Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
1.0 INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY Escondido, California June 25, 2015 Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) have prepared the following traffic impact analysis to assess the impacts to the street system as a result of the Westminster Seminary project (Project), which proposes the development of 72 graduate housing units on the site. The Project site is located on the east side of Bear Valley Parkway, south of Boyle Avenue in the City of Escondido. The traffic analysis presented in this report includes the following: Project Description Existing Conditions Description Analysis Approach and Methodology Significance Criteria Analysis of Existing Conditions Project Trip Generation/Distribution/Assignment Cumulative Projects Analysis of Near-term Scenarios Analysis of Buildout Scenarios Site Access Discussion Significance of Impacts and Mitigation Measures LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 1 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Location The Project site is located at the southeast corner of the Bear Valley Parkway / Boyle Avenue intersection in the City of Escondido. Figure 2 1 shows the Project vicinity and Figure 2 2 illustrates, in more detail, the site location. 2.2 Project Description The proposed Project would construct 72 new student housing residential units on approximately 9.7 acres adjacent to the existing seminary. 2.3 Project Access Access to the site would be provided from the existing access along the north-western portion of the project on Boyle Avenue. All project traffic would be oriented to/from Boyle Avenue and would use the Bear Valley Parkway / Boyle Avenue intersection. Figure 2 3 shows the Project s Site Plan. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 2 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
OCEANSIDE VISTA Legend City PACIFIC O C E A N Boundary Incorporated Unincorporated SOLANA BEACH N:\2420\Figures Date: 02/24/15 5 CARLSBAD DEL MAR ENCINITAS }78 805 SAN DIEGO 5 15 8 CORONADO SAN MARCOS }56 }163 }52 }75 1 }15 ESCONDIDO NATIONAL CITY 15 }94 [_ PROJECT SITE POWAY LA MESA LEMON GROVE }54 }125 }125 SANTEE }94 }67 EL CAJON 8 [ 0 2 4 Miles Figure -1 Vicinity Map Westminster Seminary Project
N:\2420\Figures Date: 02/24/15 Figure 2-2 Project Area Map Westminster Seminary Project
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Effective evaluation of the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Project requires an understanding of the existing transportation system within the Project study area. Figure 3 1 shows an existing conditions diagram, including signalized/unsignalized intersections and lane configurations. The study area was determined in accordance with the City of Escondido s published Traffic Impact Analysis Requirement Guidelines (2014). Further details on the City s guidelines for developing the study area can be found in Section 4.0. The study area includes the following five (5) intersections and six (6) street segments. Intersections: 1. Bear Valley Parkway / S Midway Drive 2. Bear Valley Parkway / Boyle Avenue 3. Bear Valley Parkway / Birch Avenue 4. Bear Valley Parkway / Idaho Avenue 5. Bear Valley Parkway / San Pasqual Valley Road (SR 78) Segments: 1. Bear Valley Parkway: Oak Drive to S Midway Drive 2. Bear Valley Parkway: S Midway Drive to Boyle Avenue 3. Bear Valley Parkway: Boyle Avenue to Birch Avenue 4. Bear Valley Parkway: Birch Avenue to Idaho Avenue 5. Bear Valley Parkway: Idaho Avenue to San Pasqual Valley Road 6. Bear Valley Parkway: San Pasqual Valley Road to Eldorado Drive 3.1 Existing Transportation Conditions The following is a brief description of the streets in the Project area. Although the project is located within the City of Escondido General Plan area and thus most of roadway classifications are taken from the City of Escondido s General Plan map, the study area includes intersections and street segments in both City of Escondido and County of San Diego jurisdictions. Bear Valley Parkway is a north/south facility with varying Mobility Element classifications. In the Project study area, from north of Midway Road to Boyle Avenue, it is currently constructed as a four-lane divided roadway and classified as Major Road. From Boyle Avenue to San Pasqual Valley Road, it is constructed as a two-lane undivided roadway and classified as a Collector. This section is in the County of San Diego. Bear Valley Parkway is under construction at present by the County of San Diego. This project will widen Bear Valley Parkway from a two-lane road to a four-lane major road from San Pasqual Valley LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 6 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
Road (SR-78) to Boyle Avenue. The Bear Valley Parkway / Boyle Avenue intersection will be signalized as part of the widening project. The widened road will connect to the existing four-lane road within the city of Escondido to the north. Bike lanes, Sidewalks, Divided Median (from San Pasqual Valley to Idaho Avenue) and Two-way Left Turn Lane (from Idaho Avenue to Boyle Avenue) are some of the major improvements. The project will be completed in summer 2016 according to the County of San Diego. Figure 3 2 shows the post Bear Valley Parkway Widening conditions diagram. S Midway Drive is classified as a Major Road on the City of Escondido mobility element. It is currently constructed as a two-lane undivided roadway with a two-way left-turn lane. The posted speed limit is 30 mph and curbside parking is provided along the road. No bicycle facilities currently exist, though Class II bicycle lanes are proposed. S Midway Drive intersects Bear Valley Parkway with an actuated signalized intersection. In addition Orange Glen High School is located in the vicinity and at the west side of this intersection. Therefore the pedestrian volumes is considerable during peak hours. Boyle Avenue is in the City of Escondido and classified as a Local Collector. It is a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Curbside parking is prohibited among the west part of Boyle Avenue, although it is allowed on the east segment of the road. Boyle Avenue intersects Bear Valley Parkway at a two-way stopped Controlled unsignalized intersection. Birch Avenue is a Local Collector road in the County of San Diego. It is currently constructed as a two-lane undivided road. Although there is no posted speed limit on the road, it is assumed the speed limit is 30 mph since the road has the same classification and geometric characteristics as Boyle Avenue. Curbside parking is prohibited among the road. Birch Avenue is two-way stopped Controlled at its intersection with Bear Valley Parkway. Idaho Avenue in the study area is located in the County of San Diego and classified as a Local Collector. It is a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Curbside parking is prohibited among the road. No bicycle facilities currently exist. Idaho Avenue intersects Bear Valley Parkway with a signalized intersection. San Pasqual Valley Road (SR 78) is classified as a Major Road. It is constructed as a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. SR 78 intersects Bear Valley Parkway at a signalized intersection. Curbside parking is not allowed on San Pasqual Valley Road. San Pasqual Valley Road and Bear Valley Road intersection is an actuated signalized with left and right turn storage lanes at the intersection. 3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Table 3 1 is a summary of the most recent available average daily traffic volumes (ADTs) from LLG counts commissioned in January 2015. Figure 3 3 shows the Existing Traffic Volumes. Appendix A contains the count sheets. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 7 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
Street Segment TABLE 3 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ADT a Bear Valley Parkway Oak Drive to S Midway Drive 13,220 S Midway Drive to Boyle Avenue 17,922 Boyle Avenue to Birch Avenue 18,659 Birch Avenue to Idaho Avenue 18,832 Idaho Avenue to San Pasqual Valley Road 17,533 San Pasqual Valley Road to Eldorado Drive 21,610 Footnotes: a. Average Daily Traffic Volume counts conducted in January 2015 by LLG Engineers. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 8 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
2U 40 1 2U 2 3 4 5 Midway Dr Boyle Ave Birch Ave Idaho Ave Sn Psql Vly Rd Êe ee Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy!$!$!$!$ Êe ee Êe ee Austin Wy D / U XX Birch Ave 2U 55 Study Intersections San Pasqual Turn Lane Configurations Intersection Control # Number of Travel Lanes Divided / Undivided Roadway Posted Speed Limit Two-Way Left-Turn Median Idaho Ave 3U Valley R d Boyle Ave 2U 2U 2U 55 Bear Valley Pkwy 35 2U 4 2U 5 3 30 40 2U Midway Dr 2 2U 4D 30 45 2U 2U 25 4D 25!!!!! } 78 1 Bear Valley Pkwy Project Site Austin Wy 3U 55 N:\2420\Figures Date: 02/24/15 Figure 3-1 Existing Conditions Diagram Westminster Seminary Project
4D 40 1 2U 2 3 4 5 Midway Dr Boyle Ave Birch Ave Idaho Ave Sn Psql Vly Rd Êe ee Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Êe ee!$!$ Êe ee Êe ee Austin Wy D / U XX Birch Ave 2U 55 Study Intersections San Pasqual Turn Lane Configurations Intersection Control # Number of Travel Lanes Divided / Undivided Roadway Posted Speed Limit Two-Way Left-Turn Median Idaho Ave 3U Valley R d Boyle Ave 2U 2U 4D 55 Bear Valley Pkwy 35 4U 4 2U 5 4U 3 30 40 Midway Dr 2 2U 45 4D 30 45 2U 2U 25 4D 25!!!!! } 78 1 Bear Valley Pkwy Project Site Austin Wy 3U 55 N:\2420\Figures Date: 03\/05/15 Figure 3-2 Post Bear Valley Project Construction Conditions Diagram Westminster Seminary Project
1 2 3 4 5 Midway Dr 19 / 18 187 / 81 18 / 4 181 / 32 17 / 5 614 / 607 815 / 480 808 / 602 643 / 523 668 / 351 71 / 90 3 / 3 5 / 6 41 / 13 95 / 29 18 / 17 289 / 84 216 / 205 Boyle Ave Birch Ave Idaho Ave 60 / 12 11 / 4 78 / 80 19 / 13 7 / 21 27 / 7 126 / 120 33 / 49 1 / 7 Sn Psql Vly Rd 17 / 24 430 / 715 124 / 113 Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy 90 / 23 235 / 77 43 / 20 1 / 7 8 / 16 60 / 158 328 / 226 242 / 920 448 / 1,058 359 / 834 321 / 633 1 / 5 5 / 5 41 / 11 19 / 18 5 / 13 9 / 18 6 / 11 9 / 0 6 / 6 6 / 2 3 / 6 54 / 46 9 / 4 70 / 81 680 / 585 229 / 128 126 / 159 366 / 1,281 81 / 181 Austin Wy Birch Ave San Pasqual Idaho Ave Valley R d Boyle Ave Bear Valley Pkwy 21,610 18,832 4 17,533 5 18,659 3 Midway Dr 2 17,922 13,220 } 78!!!!! 1 Bear Valley Pkwy Project Site Austin Wy!# AM / PM XXXX Study Intersections AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes Average Daily Trips N:\2420\Figures Date: 02/25/15 Figure 3-3 Existing Traffic Volumes Westminster Seminary Project
4.0 ANALYSIS APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY Level of service (LOS) is the term used to denote the different operating conditions which occur on a given roadway segment under various traffic volume loads. It is a qualitative measure used to describe a quantitative analysis taking into account factors such as roadway geometries, signal phasing, speed, travel delay, freedom to maneuver, and safety. Level of service provides an index to the operational qualities of a roadway segment or an intersection. Level of service designations range from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F representing the worst operating conditions. Level of service designation is reported differently for signalized intersections, unsignalized intersections and roadway segments. The City of Escondido s recently published Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines provide the following direction on report approach and methodology: 1. The traffic study should include a SANDAG prepared Select Zone Assignment for the project to determine the project traffic distribution. 2. The traffic study should utilize the Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) published by SANDAG, to determine the project traffic volume. 3. Traffic should utilize the following scenarios to determine project traffic impacts at intersections and along roadway segments. a. Existing Condition (based on new traffic counts) b. Existing + Project Traffic Condition c. Existing + Cumulative Projects Traffic Condition d. Existing + Cumulative Projects + Project Traffic Condition e. Year 2035 Traffic Condition 4. Highway Capacity Manual (Year 2010) should be utilized to determine level of service for intersections. 5. The study area should include at least all site access points and major intersections (signalized and unsignalized) adjacent to the site. The tables below contain the trigger-points to identify if a roadway segment or intersection should be included in the Traffic Impact Analysis. Table 4 1 below contains the trigger-points for roadway segments within the City of Escondido for different street classifications based on ADT added to the segment. Table 4 2 below contains the trigger-points for intersections based on peak hour volumes. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 12 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
TABLE 4 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ADT THRESHOLDS FOR ROADWAY SEGMENTS Street Classification Lanes Cross Sections (ft.) TIA Trigger-Points (ADT generation) Prime Arterial Major Road Collector (8 lanes) 116/136 (NP) 900 (6 lanes) 106/126 (NP) 800 (6 lanes) 90/110 (NP) 700 (4 lanes) 82/102 (NP) 500 (4 lanes) 64/84 (NP) 500 (4 lanes) (WP) 250 Local Collector and all other (2 lanes) 42/66 (NP) (WP) 200 TABLE 4 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ADT THRESHOLDS FOR INTERSECTIONS Intersection Classification (Minor leg of the intersection) TIA Trigger-Points (AM or PM peak hour trips added to any leg) Prime Arterial 50 Major Road 40 Collector 30 Local Collector 20 Signalized intersections were analyzed under AM and PM peak hour conditions. Average vehicle delay was determined utilizing the methodology found in Chapter 18 of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), with the assistance of the Synchro (version 9) computer software. The delay values (represented in seconds) were qualified with a corresponding intersection Level of Service (LOS). Signalized intersection calculation worksheets and a more detailed explanation of the methodology are attached in Appendix B. Unsignalized intersections were analyzed under AM and PM peak hour conditions. Average vehicle delay and Levels of Service (LOS) was determined based upon the procedures found in Chapters 19 and 20 of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), with the assistance of the Synchro (version 9) computer software. Unsignalized intersection calculation worksheets and a more detailed explanation of the methodology are attached in Appendix B. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 13 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
Street segment analysis is based upon the comparison of daily traffic volumes (ADTs) to the City of Escondido Roadway Classification, Level of Service, and ADT Table. This table provides segment capacities for different street classifications, based on traffic volumes and roadway characteristics. The City of Escondido Roadway Classification, Level of Service, and ADT Table is attached in Appendix C. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 14 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
5.0 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA The project study area includes locations that lie exclusively within the City of Escondido. The following is a summary of the City s published significance criteria. 5.1 City of Escondido In accordance with SANTEC/ITE Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies in the San Diego Region, the following thresholds shall be used to identify if a project is of significant traffic impact under any scenario. Based on SANTEC/ITE guidelines, if now or in the future, the project s traffic impact causes the values in Table 5 1 below to be exceeded in a roadway segment or an intersection that is operating at LOS D or worse, it is determined to be a significant impact and the project shall identify mitigation measures. TABLE 5 1 CITY OF ESCONDIDO TRAFFIC IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS Level of Service With Project D, E, or F Allowable Change due to Project Impact Roadway Segments Intersections V/C Speed Reduction (mph) Delay (sec.) 0.02 1 2 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 15 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
6.0 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 6.1 Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service Table 6 1 summarizes the existing peak hour intersection operations. As shown, all the signalized study area intersections are calculated to currently operate at service levels of LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours before and after Bear Valley Parkway widening project. Minor street movement of the only unsignalized intersection in the study area, are calculated to operate at LOS D to F during AM and PM peak hours. Intersection TABLE 6 1 EXISTING INTERSECTION OPERATIONS Control Type Peak Hour Existing Existing (Post Bear Valley Widening Construction) Delay a LOS b Delay a LOS b 1. Bear Valley Parkway/ S Midway Drive 2. Bear Valley Pkwy/ Boyle Avenue 3. Bear Valley Parkway/ Birch Avenue 4. Bear Valley Parkway/ Idaho venue 5. Bear Valley Parkway/ San Pasqual Valley Road Signal TWSC c (Signal) d TWSC c Signal Signal AM 22.8 C 22.8 C PM 7.8 A 7.8 A AM 74.2 F 6.3 A PM 114.3 F 5.8 A AM 36.1 E 26.4 D PM 84.5 F 55.1 F AM 16.6 B 10.7 B PM 11.8 B 7.9 A AM 15.3 B 15.3 B PM 21.4 C 21.4 C Footnotes: a. Average delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. b. Level of Service. c. Two-Way Stop Controlled intersection, minor street left turn LOS indicated. d. After construction of Bear Valley Widening Project, Bear Valley Parkway/Boyle Avenue would operate as a Signalized intersection. SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED DELAY/LOS THRESHOLDS DELAY/LOS THRESHOLDS Delay LOS Delay LOS 0.0 10.0 A 0.0 10.0 A 10.1 to 20.0 B 10.1 to 15.0 B 20.1 to 35.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 C 35.1 to 55.0 D 25.1 to 35.0 D 55.1 to 80.0 E 35.1 to 50.0 E 80.1 F 50.1 F LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 16 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
6.2 Daily Street Segment Levels of Service Table 6 2 summarizes the post Bear Valley Widening Project construction segment operations along the key study area roadways. As shown, Bear Valley Parkway from Eldorado Drive to San Pasqual Road is calculated to operate at LOS C. All other roadway segments operate at LOS B. Street Segment TABLE 6 2 POST BEAR VALLEY PROJECT STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS Existing Classification Capacity (LOS E) a ADT b LOS c V/C d Bear Valley Parkway Oak Drive to Midway Drive 4-Lane Major 37,000 13,220 B 0.36 Midway Drive to Boyle Avenue 4-Lane Major 37,000 17,922 B 0.48 Boyle Avenue to Birch Avenue 4-Lane Major 37,000 18,659 B 0.50 Birch Avenue to Idaho Avenue 4-Lane Major 37,000 18,832 B 0.51 Idaho Avenue to San Pasqual Road 4-Lane Major 37,000 17,533 B 0.47 San Pasqual Road to Eldorado Drive 4-Lane Major 37,000 21,610 C 0.58 Footnotes: a. Capacities based on City of Escondido Roadway Classification Table. b. Average Daily Traffic Volumes c. Level of Service d. Volume to Capacity LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 17 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
7.0 TRIP GENERATION/DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT 7.1 Trip Generation The Project proposes to develop 72 new student housing units on an approximately 9.7 acre site. The subject project differs significantly from a traditional multifamily project. The existing Seminary is a commuter school, meaning no students currently live on campus. Every student must commute to and from campus in order to attend class or study at the library. After the project is completed, however, the vast majority (approximately 75%) of the students will be living on campus, thus making a daily commute to and from campus unnecessary. Since students will already be on campus, they can simply walk to class or the library and then walk back to their residence. Most students will even walk home for lunch, thus decreasing traffic impact during the lunch hour. Less than a quarter of the student body will continue to commute. There will be miscellaneous additional trips to the grocery store and other destinations throughout the week, but these will be minimal based on the economic situation of the students. While there will be some children living in the student housing units, very few will be school age since most students are in their mid-20s. Laundry facilities and a playground are part of the project, Seminary will further minimize the need for additional trips off campus. The net effect of the completed student housing project will likely be a decrease in the daily trips to and from the seminary. However in order to be conservative, an increase in traffic due to the project was assumed. The typical apartment trip rate is 6 ADT per unit. Based on the above discussion, half of this rate (3 ADT / unit) was utilized. As discussed above, it is believed that this rate overstates the amount of new trips that the project will generate and the analysis is therefore conservative. Table 7 1 shows a summary of the Project traffic generation. As tabulated the proposed Project is calculated to generate 216 daily trips with 17 trips (3 inbound/14 outbound) in AM peak hour and 19 trips (13 inbound/6 outbound) during PM peak hour. Land Use Size TABLE 7 1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Daily Trip Ends (ADTs) Rate a Volume % of ADT AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In:Out Volume % of In:Out Volume Split In Out ADT Split In Out Student Apartments 72 DU 3/DU 216 8% 20:80 3 14 9% 70:30 13 6 Footnotes: a. Rate is based on SANDAG s (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002 for apartments. One half of the SANDAG rate was utilized. 7.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment The project-generated traffic was distributed and assigned to the road network based on the project s proximity to the north and south segments of Bear Valley Road and to the west and east side of S LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 18 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
Midway Drive, Boyle, Birch, Idaho Avenue and San Pasqual Valley Road. LLG applied engineering judgment based on existing traffic flows, intersection controls and roadway characteristics to inform the local distribution among the nearby intersections. Figure 7-1 and Figure 7-2 depicts the project trip distribution/assignment in the study area. Figure 7 3 shows Existing + Project traffic volumes. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 19 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
1 10% Midway Dr 5% Midway Dr 5% 2 Boyle Ave 15% 3 Birch Ave 5% 4 Idaho Ave 10% 5 Sn Psql Vly Rd 20% 15% 5% 62% 3% 10% 49% 3% 20% 24% 5% Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy 5% 10% 70% 62% 49% 24% 15% 15% 70% 3% 3% 5% Austin Wy Birch Ave San Pasqual 20% 5% 10% Idaho Ave Valley R d Boyle Ave 24% Bear Valley Pkwy 4 5 15% 3 2 3% 5% 3% 10%!!!!! } 78 1 Bear Valley Pkwy Project Site Austin Wy XX% Project Traffic Distribution Inbound Distribution by Movement X% X% Outbound Distribution by Movement N:\2420\Figures Date: 02/24/15 Figure 7-1 Project Trip Distribution Westminster Seminary Project
1 2 3 4 5 Midway Dr Boyle Ave Birch Ave Idaho Ave 0 / 1 1 / 2 1 / 1 9 / 4 1 / 0 0 / 1 2 / 1 7 / 3 1 / 0 3 / 1 4 / 2 1 / 2 Sn Psql Vly Rd 1 / 3 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 0 Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy 2 / 9 2 / 8 2 / 7 1 / 0 2 / 1 1 / 3 2 / 1 2 / 1 10 / 4 0 / 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 Austin Wy Birch Ave San Pasqual Idaho Ave Valley R d Boyle Ave Bear Valley Pkwy 52 134 4 106 5 151 3 Midway Dr 2 33 } 78 21!!!!! 1 Bear Valley Pkwy Project Site Austin Wy!# AM / PM XXXX Study Intersections AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes Average Daily Trips N:\2420\Figures Date: 06/24/15 Figure 7-2 Project Traffic Volumes Westminster Seminary Project
1 2 3 4 5 Midway Dr 22 / 19 189 / 82 19 / 5 181 / 32 17 / 5 618 / 609 822 / 483 817 / 606 643 / 523 669 / 353 72 / 90 4 / 3 6 / 6 42 / 15 95 / 29 18 / 17 289 / 84 216 / 206 Boyle Ave Birch Ave Idaho Ave 60 / 12 12 / 6 78 / 80 19 / 14 7 / 21 27 / 7 127 / 122 33 / 49 1 / 7 Sn Psql Vly Rd 18 / 27 430 / 715 124 / 113 Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy 90 / 23 235 / 77 43 / 20 1 / 7 8 / 16 60 / 158 329 / 226 244 / 927 450 / 1,066 359 / 834 323 / 634 1 / 5 5 / 5 43 / 20 19 / 18 7 / 14 11 / 19 16 / 15 9 / 1 6 / 6 6 / 2 3 / 7 54 / 46 9 / 4 70 / 82 680 / 585 229 / 128 126 / 159 367 / 1,284 81 / 181 Austin Wy Birch Ave San Pasqual Idaho Ave Valley R d Boyle Ave Bear Valley Pkwy 21,662 18,966 4 17,639 5 18,810 3 Midway Dr 2 17,955 13,241 } 78!!!!! 1 Bear Valley Pkwy Project Site Austin Wy!# AM / PM XXXX Study Intersections AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes Average Daily Trips N:\2420\Figures Date: 06/24/15 Figure 7-3 Existing + Project Traffic Volumes Westminster Seminary Project
8.0 CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES Cumulative projects are other projects in the study area that will add traffic to the local circulation system in the near future. LLG researched potential cumulative projects within the City of Escondido and County of San Diego to identify if any potential discretionary projects could be included for analysis. Based on the research conducted, three (3) cumulative projects were included in this study. The following is a brief description of the projects that were considered as cumulative projects. 661 Bear Valley proposes the development of 55 residential dwelling units on 40.88 acres. The project site is located east of Bear Valley Parkway, north of Encino Drive in the City of Escondido. The project is calculated to generate 550 daily trips with 44 trips (13 inbound/31 outbound) in AM peak hour and 55 trips (39 inbound/16 outbound) during PM peak hour. 20 percent of the 661 Bear Valley inbound and outbound Project traffic is expected to take Bear Valley Road from El Dorado Drive to San Pasqual Valley Road and use Bear Valley Parkway / San Pasqual Valley Road intersection and 6 percent of the volume continues on Bear Valley Parkway to the north. Safari Highland Ranch to be located north of San Pasqual Valley Road (SR 78) and the Wild Animal Park and east of Cloverdale Road. The property is proposed to be annexed from the County of San Diego into the City of Escondido. Safari Highland Ranch project proposes approximately 550 single-family estate homes, 5 acres regional park, fire station and some specialty retails. It is calculated that this project would generate 6,478 daily trips with 545 trips (175 inbound, 370 outbound) in AM peak hour and 647 trips (446 inbound, 201 outbound) during PM peak hour. Emmanuel Faith Community Church is located at an existing site east of Encino Drive, between E. 17th Avenue and Eldorado Drive in the City of Escondido, adjacent to the County of San Diego. Emmanuel Faith Community Church proposes a master plan to renovate several existing buildings along with some new buildings, replace existing classrooms and a nursery, construct a new youth building with meeting rooms, expand of the worship area by 400 seats and construct a preschool. During the week it is calculated to generate 1,056 daily trips with 173 trips (87 inbound/86 outbound) in the AM peak hour and 184 trips (92 inbound/92 outbound) during the PM peak hour. It is calculated that 25 percent of the generated traffic would be oriented to/from San Pasqual Valley Road and 20 percent would be oriented along Bear Valley Parkway to the north. Figure 8 1 shows the total cumulative traffic volumes. Figure 8 2 shows the existing + cumulative traffic volumes. Figure 8 3 shows the existing + project + cumulative traffic volumes. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 23 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
1 2 3 4 5 Midway Dr 3 / 4 17 / 18 1 / 2 8 / 23 18 / 30 9 / 15 4 / 6 5 / 9 6 / 11 Boyle Ave 3 / 4 Birch Ave Idaho Ave Sn Psql Vly Rd 9 / 15 17 / 18 71 / 199 3 / 8 Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy 4 / 3 13 / 10 1 / 1 1 / 2 1 / 3 3 / 4 4 / 3 18 / 14 2 / 1 4 / 3 24 / 18 2 / 2 6 / 4 30 / 23 2 / 2 19 / 10 160 / 88 22 / 13 2 / 1 2 / 1 11 / 28 Austin Wy Birch Ave San Pasqual Idaho Ave Valley R d Boyle Ave Bear Valley Pkwy 506 459 4 574 5 344 3 Midway Dr 2 230 } 78 115!!!!! 1 Bear Valley Pkwy Project Site Austin Wy!# AM / PM XXXX Study Intersections AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes Average Daily Trips N:\2420\Figures Date: 02/25/15 Figure 8-1 Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes Westminster Seminary Project
1 2 3 4 5 17 / 5 Midway Dr 18 / 17 289 / 84 219 / 209 181 / 32 Boyle Ave 60 / 12 11 / 4 81 / 84 18 / 4 Birch Ave 5 / 6 19 / 13 7 / 21 31 / 13 187 / 81 Idaho Ave 3 / 3 126 / 120 33 / 49 6 / 16 36 / 36 615 / 609 833 / 510 817 / 617 652 / 538 674 / 362 Sn Psql Vly Rd 95 / 29 41 / 13 79 / 113 34 / 42 501 / 914 127 / 121 Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy 90 / 23 235 / 77 43 / 20 332 / 229 334 / 643 5 / 13 9 / 18 7 / 13 9 / 0 6 / 6 7 / 5 20 / 19 64 / 161 377 / 848 43 / 12 12 / 19 472 / 1,076 7 / 7 3 / 6 54 / 46 12 / 8 7 / 11 272 / 943 3 / 7 89 / 91 840 / 673 251 / 141 128 / 160 368 / 1,282 92 / 209 Austin Wy Birch Ave San Pasqual Idaho Ave Valley R d Boyle Ave Bear Valley Pkwy 22,116 19,291 4 18,107 5 19,003 3 Midway Dr 2 18,152 13,335 } 78!!!!! 1 Bear Valley Pkwy Project Site Austin Wy!# AM / PM XXXX Study Intersections AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes Average Daily Trips N:\2420\Figures Date: 02/25/15 Figure 8-2 Existing + Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes Westminster Seminary Project
1 2 3 4 5 Midway Dr 181 / 32 17 / 5 652 / 538 675 / 364 42 / 15 95 / 29 18 / 17 289 / 84 219 / 210 Boyle Ave Birch Ave Idaho Ave 60 / 12 12 / 6 81 / 84 189 / 82 19 / 5 840 / 513 826 / 621 4 / 3 6 / 6 19 / 14 7 / 21 31 / 13 127 / 122 33 / 49 6 / 16 39 / 37 619 / 611 80 / 113 Sn Psql Vly Rd 35 / 45 501 / 914 127 / 121 Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy Bear Vly Pkwy 90 / 23 235 / 77 43 / 20 333 / 229 336 / 644 9 / 1 6 / 6 7 / 5 20 / 19 7 / 14 11 / 19 17 / 17 64 / 161 377 / 848 45 / 21 12 / 19 474 / 1,084 7 / 7 3 / 7 54 / 46 12 / 8 7 / 11 274 / 950 3 / 7 89 / 92 840 / 673 251 / 141 128 / 160 369 / 1,285 92 / 209 Austin Wy Birch Ave San Pasqual Idaho Ave Valley R d Boyle Ave Bear Valley Pkwy 22,168 19,425 4 18,213 5 19,154 3 Midway Dr 2 18,185 13,356 } 78!!!!! 1 Bear Valley Pkwy Project Site Austin Wy!# AM / PM XXXX Study Intersections AM / PM Intersection Peak Hour Volumes Average Daily Trips N:\2420\Figures Date: 06/24/15 Figure 8-3 Existing + Project + Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes Westminster Seminary Project
9.0 ANALYSIS OF NEAR-TERM SCENARIOS The following is a summary of the operational analyses for the various street-system components for the near-term traffic scenarios. 9.1 Existing + Project 9.1.1 Intersection Analysis Table 9 1 summarizes the peak hour intersection operations with the addition of the Project traffic. As shown in Table 9 1 the minor-street left-turns are calculated to operate at LOS D and F at the intersections of Bear Valley Parkway/Birch Avenue during AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Since the Project adds virtually no minor-street left-turn volume to the Bear Valley Parkway / Birch Avenue intersection (see Figure 7-2) and the overall minor-street volumes are very small, no significant impact is calculated at this intersection. As tabulated in Table 9 1 no significant impacts were identified to the signalized intersections in the study area as well. 9.1.2 Segment Operations Table 9 2 summarizes the roadway segment operations with the addition of Project traffic. As seen in Table 9 2, all of the study area segments are calculated to continue to operate at LOS B, except for the segment on Bear Valley Parkway from Eldorado Drive to San Pasqual Road, which continues to operate at LOS C. As shown in Table 9 2 and Based on the City of Escondido s significance criteria, no significant impacts were identified to the segments. 9.2 Existing + Cumulative Growth 9.2.1 Intersection Analysis Table 9 1 summarizes the peak hour intersection operations with the addition of cumulative growth traffic. Table 9 1 shows that all study area signalized intersections are calculated to operate at LOS C or better, while the minor-street movements at the Bear Valley Parkway/Birch Avenue unsignalized intersection operates at LOS D and F during peak hours. 9.2.2 Segment Operations Table 9 2 summarizes the roadway segment operations with the addition of cumulative growth traffic. As seen in Table 9 2, five Bear Valley Parkway segments (from Oak Drive to San Pasqual Road) are calculated to continue to operate at LOS B. Additionally, Bear Valley Parkway from San Pasqual Road to Eldorado Avenue is calculated to operate at LOS C. 9.3 Existing + Project + Cumulative Growth 9.3.1 Intersection Analysis Table 9 1 summarizes the peak hour intersection operations for Existing + Cumulative Growth + Project conditions. Table 9 1 shows that again the Project will not results in significant impacts on all the intersections and all of the study area signalized intersections are calculated to operate at LOS LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 27 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
C or better and the minor-street left-turn unsignalized intersection ( Bear Valley Parkway/Birch Avenue) operates at LOS D to F during the peak hours. 9.3.2 Segment Operations Table 9 2 summarizes the roadway segment operations for the Existing + Cumulative Growth + Project conditions. As seen in Table 9 2 and according to the 0.02 allowable increase in V/C ratio, no significant impacts are calculated and the LOS remains unchanged with the addition of cumulative growth traffic + Project conditions on all of the segments in the study area. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 28 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
TABLE 9-1 NEAR-TERM INTERSECTION OPERATIONS Intersection Control Type Peak Hour Existing Existing (Post Construction) Existing + Project Existing + Cumulative Projects Existing + Cumulative Projects + Project Delay a LOS b Delay LOS Delay LOS Δ c Delay LOS Delay LOS Δ Significant Impact? 1. Bear Valley Parkway/ S Midway Drive 2. Bear Valley Pkwy/ Boyle Avenue Signal TWSC d (Signal) e AM 22.8 C 22.8 C 22.8 C 0.0 22.8 C 22.8 C 0.0 No PM 7.8 A 7.8 A 7.8 A 0.0 7.8 A 7.9 A 0.1 No AM 74.2 F 6.3 A 6.4 A 0.1 6.3 A 6.5 A 0.2 No PM 114.3 F 5.8 A 5.9 A 0.1 5.8 A 5.9 A 0.1 No 3. Bear Valley Parkway/ Birch Avenue TWSC d AM 36.1 E 26.4 D 27.2 D 0.8 27.2 D 27.8 D 0.6 No PM 84.5 F 55.1 F 55.8 F 0.7 64.0 F 65.0 F 1.0 No 4. Bear Valley Parkway/ Idaho venue Signal AM 16.6 B 10.7 B 10.8 B 0.1 11.3 B 11.4 B 0.1 No PM 11.8 B 7.9 A 8.0 A 0.1 8.4 A 8.5 A 0.1 No 5. Bear Valley Parkway/ San Pasqual Valley Road Signal AM 15.3 B 15.3 B 15.4 B 0.1 17.0 B 17.1 B 0.1 No PM 21.4 C 21.4 C 21.5 C 0.1 28.8 C 28.9 C 0.1 No Footnotes: a. Average delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. b. Level of Service. c. Δ denotes an increase in delay due to project. d. TWSC Two-Way Stop-Controlled. e. After construction of Bear Valley Widening Project, Bear Valley Parkway/Boyle Avenue would operate as a Signalized intersection. SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED DELAY/LOS THRESHOLDS DELAY/LOS THRESHOLDS Delay LOS Delay LOS 0.0 10.0 A 0.0 10.0 A 10.1 to 20.0 B 10.1 to 15.0 B 20.1 to 35.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 C 35.1 to 55.0 D 25.1 to 35.0 D 55.1 to 80.0 E 35.1 to 50.0 E 80.1 F 50.1 F LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 Westminster Seminary 29 N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
Street Segment Bear Valley Parkway TABLE 9-2 NEAR-TERM STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS POST BEAR VALLEY WIDENING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION Capacity (LOS E) a Existing Existing + Project Existing + Cumulative Projects Existing + Cumulative Projects + Project Sig Impact? ADT b LOS c V/C d ADT LOS V/C Δ e ADT LOS V/C ADT LOS V/C Δ e Oak Drive to Midway Drive 37,000 13,220 B 0.36 13,241 B 0.36 0.00 13,335 B 0.36 13,356 B 0.36 0.00 No Midway Drive to Boyle Avenue 37,000 17,922 B 0.48 17,955 B 0.49 0.01 18,152 B 0.49 18,185 B 0.49 0.00 No Boyle Avenue to Birch Avenue 37,000 18,659 B 0.50 18,810 B 0.51 0.01 19,003 B 0.51 19,154 B 0.52 0.01 No Birch Avenue to Idaho Avenue 37,000 18,832 B 0.51 18,966 B 0.51 0.00 19,291 B 0.52 19,425 B 0.53 0.01 No Idaho Avenue to San Pasqual Road 37,000 17,533 B 0.47 17,639 B 0.48 0.01 18,107 B 0.49 18,213 B 0.49 0.00 No San Pasqual Road to Eldorado Drive 37,000 21,610 C 0.58 21,662 C 0.59 0.01 22,116 C 0.60 22,168 C 0.60 0.00 No Footnotes: a. Capacities based on the City of Escondido Roadway Classification (See Appendix C). b. Average Daily Traffic c. Level of Service d. Volume to Capacity ratio e. Δ denotes a Project-induced increase in the Volume to Capacity (V/C) ratio. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 Westminster Seminary 30 N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
10.0 ANALYSIS OF BUILDOUT SCENARIO 10.1 Buildout Buildout traffic volumes were obtained from the SANDAG Series 11 traffic model (Year 2030, volumes adjusted to Year 2035). This model was utilized because it includes the approved land uses associated with the City of Escondido s recent General Plan Update. Table 10 1 summarizes the roadway segment operations for Year 2035. As shown in Table 10 1, all Bear Valley Parkway segments within the study area are calculated to operate at LOS C or better except for San Pasqual Road to Eldorado Drive which would operate at LOS F. 10.2 Buildout + Project Figure 10 2 shows Year 2035 Buildout + Project traffic volumes. As seen in Table 10 1 the LOS remains unchanged with the addition of Project traffic. The Project-attributable increases in V/C do not exceed the allowable 0.02. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 Westminster Seminary 31 N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
TABLE 10 1 BUILDOUT STREET SEGMENT OPERATIONS Street Segment Adopted Circulation Element Capacity (LOS E) a Buildout Buildout With Project ADT b LOS c V/C d ADT LOS V/C Δ e Sig? f Bear Valley Parkway Oak Drive to Midway Drive 37,000 13,020 B 0.35 13,041 B 0.35 0.00 No Midway Drive to Boyle Avenue 37,000 19,990 B 0.54 20,023 B 0.54 0.00 No Boyle Avenue to Birch Avenue 37,000 20,600 C 0.56 20,751 C 0.56 0.00 No Birch Avenue to Idaho Avenue 37,000 21,060 C 0.57 21,194 C 0.57 0.00 No Idaho Avenue to San Pasqual Road 37,000 21,530 C 0.58 21,636 C 0.58 0.00 No San Pasqual Road to Eldorado Drive 37,000 40,800 F 1.10 40,852 F 1.10 0.00 No Footnotes: a. Capacity based on City of Escondido s roadway classification Table. b. Average Daily Traffic. c. Level of Service. d. Volume to Capacity. e. Δ denotes a Project-induced increase in the Volume to Capacity (V/C) ratio. f. Sig = significant Project impact based on Significance Criteria. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 Westminster Seminary 32 N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
Bear Valley Pkwy 21,530 Midway Dr 13,020 19,990 Bear Valley Pkwy Boyle Ave!!!!! Austin Wy Project Site Birch Ave 20,600 Idaho Ave 21,060 San Pasqual Valley R d 40,800 } 78 XXXX Average Daily Trips N:\2420\Figures Date: 02/25/15 Figure 10-1 Year 2035 Traffic Volumes Westminster Seminary Project
Bear Valley Pkwy 21,636 Midway Dr 13,041 20,023 Bear Valley Pkwy Boyle Ave!!!!! Austin Wy Project Site Birch Ave 20,751 Idaho Ave 21,194 San Pasqual Valley R d 40,852 } 78 XXXX Average Daily Trips N:\2420\Figures Date: 06/24/15 Figure 10-2 Year 2035 + Project Traffic Volumes Westminster Seminary Project
11.0 PROJECT ACCESS Access to the proposed project is via an existing driveway off Boyle Avenue at the north-western part of the site. All project volumes will distribute to Bear Valley Parkway directly through Boyle Avenue. The analysis shows that the Bear Valley Parkway / Boyle Avenue signalized intersection can accommodate all the project traffic without any perceptible changes in delay. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 Westminster Seminary 35 N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
12.0 SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Per the City of Escondido significance thresholds and the analysis methodologies presented in this report, Project-related and cumulative traffic are calculated to cause no significant impact on adjacent street system components. Therefore, no mitigation is necessary. End of Report LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 Westminster Seminary 36 N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\2420 Report-3.doc
TECHNICAL APPENDICES WESTMINSTER SEMINARY Escondido, California June 25, 2015 LLG Ref. 3-15-2420
APPENDIX A INTERSECTION AND SEGMENT MANUAL COUNT SHEETS LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 Westminster Seminary N:\2420\2nd Submittal\Report\Appendices\2420 Appendix cover.doc
Turn Count Summary Accurate Video Counts Inc info@accuratevideocounts.com (619) 987-5136 Location: S Midway Drive @ Bear Valley Pkwy Date of Count: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 Analysts: LV/CD Weather: Sunny AVC Proj No: 15-0301 0 / 2 / / / 7 / 15 1 / 2 18 / 17 289 / 84 216 / 205 / 85 / 8 90 / 23 235 / 77 43 / 20 0 / 9 0 / 0 328 / 226 321 / 633 19 / 18 2 / 2 17 5 668 351 95 29 Bear Valley Pkwy S Midway Drive 7 13 Time Period PHF 0.71 0.96 S Midway Drive Bear Valley Pkwy 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM www.accuratevideocounts.com P.O. Box 261425 San Diego CA 92196 2/2/2015
Vehicular Count Accurate Video Counts Inc info@accuratevideocounts.com (619) 987-5136 Location: Southbound @ Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL 7:00 AM 4 171 9 5 29 6 0 57 33 54 49 3 420 7:15 AM 6 148 31 27 71 10 7 72 93 60 114 4 643 7:30 AM 5 197 50 49 105 22 11 98 110 51 122 8 828 7:45 AM 2 152 5 9 30 5 1 94 92 51 4 3 448 8:00 AM 2 138 1 0 1 0 1 76 38 45 0 2 304 8:15 AM 2 157 0 0 0 0 15 72 34 45 1 3 329 8:30 AM 0 129 1 0 0 0 0 66 30 37 0 2 265 8:45 AM 2 110 1 1 0 1 2 72 28 41 0 1 259 Total 23 1,202 98 91 236 44 37 607 458 384 290 26 3,496 AM Intersection Peak Hour : S Midway Drive AM Period (7:00 AM - 9:00 AM) Westbound Northbound 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM Bear Valley Pkwy Eastbound Intersection PHF : 0.71 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL Volume 17 668 95 90 235 43 19 321 328 216 289 18 2,339 PHF 0.71 0.85 0.48 0.46 0.56 0.49 0.43 0.82 0.75 0.90 0.59 0.56 0.71 Movement PHF 0.77 0.52 0.76 0.72 0.71 PM Period (4:00 PM - 6:00 PM) Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL 4:00 PM 1 89 7 2 29 1 4 141 60 50 25 7 416 4:15 PM 1 102 3 3 21 2 6 151 56 44 22 6 417 4:30 PM 3 109 9 4 14 5 7 158 55 56 16 6 442 4:45 PM 5 90 3 8 17 3 6 139 46 44 20 4 385 5:00 PM 0 86 5 7 14 7 3 171 55 49 18 3 418 5:15 PM 1 107 6 7 22 8 6 145 49 43 12 5 411 5:30 PM 2 72 14 5 22 3 4 174 60 51 30 1 438 5:45 PM 2 86 4 4 19 2 5 143 62 62 24 8 421 Total 15 741 51 40 158 31 41 1,222 443 399 167 40 3,348 PM Intersection Peak Hour : 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM Intersection PHF : 0.96 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL Volume 5 351 29 23 77 20 18 633 226 205 84 17 1688 PHF 0.63 0.82 0.518 0.821 0.875 0.625 0.75 0.909 0.911 0.827 0.7 0.531 0.96 Movement PHF 0.84 0.81 0.92 0.81 0.96 www.accuratevideocounts.com P.O. Box 261425 San Diego CA 92196 2/2/2015
Turn Count Summary Accurate Video Counts Inc info@accuratevideocounts.com (619) 987-5136 Location: Boyle Avenue @ Bear Valley Pkwy Date of Count: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 Analysts: LV/CD Weather: Sunny AVC Proj No: 15-0301 0 / 1 / / / 0 / 1 0 / 0 60 / 12 11 / 4 78 / 80 / 1 / 3 5 / 13 9 / 18 6 / 11 0 / 0 0 / 0 60 / 158 359 / 834 41 / 11 0 / 1 181 32 643 523 41 13 Bear Valley Pkwy Boyle Avenue 1 1 Time Period PHF 0.93 0.95 Boyle Avenue Bear Valley Pkwy 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM www.accuratevideocounts.com P.O. Box 261425 San Diego CA 92196 2/2/2015
Vehicular Count Accurate Video Counts Inc info@accuratevideocounts.com (619) 987-5136 Location: Southbound @ Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL 7:00 AM 15 194 4 0 1 4 0 84 18 25 1 11 357 7:15 AM 31 191 1 2 2 3 7 101 17 20 1 27 403 7:30 AM 55 165 4 0 1 0 3 72 10 18 4 25 357 7:45 AM 58 133 20 2 2 2 19 92 13 18 5 4 368 8:00 AM 37 154 16 1 4 1 12 94 20 22 1 4 366 8:15 AM 6 164 2 1 1 1 4 89 13 12 1 1 295 8:30 AM 7 136 3 0 0 0 2 77 13 20 2 1 261 8:45 AM 5 159 3 2 2 1 1 79 10 11 1 4 278 Total 214 1,296 53 8 13 12 48 688 114 146 16 77 2,685 AM Intersection Peak Hour : Boyle Avenue AM Period (7:00 AM - 9:00 AM) Westbound Northbound 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM Bear Valley Pkwy Eastbound Intersection PHF : 0.93 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL Volume 181 643 41 5 9 6 41 359 60 78 11 60 1,494 PHF 0.78 0.84 0.51 0.63 0.56 0.50 0.54 0.89 0.75 0.89 0.55 0.56 0.93 Movement PHF 0.97 0.71 0.91 0.78 0.93 PM Period (4:00 PM - 6:00 PM) Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL 4:00 PM 16 132 5 4 10 11 4 178 24 22 1 1 408 4:15 PM 10 119 3 1 4 4 4 228 31 14 1 2 421 4:30 PM 6 145 5 9 7 4 3 199 40 29 2 1 450 4:45 PM 6 137 3 1 2 2 2 188 43 12 1 4 401 5:00 PM 10 122 2 2 5 1 2 219 44 25 0 5 437 5:15 PM 10 120 0 1 2 3 2 200 33 25 2 7 405 5:30 PM 10 130 2 2 1 3 1 226 35 23 2 2 437 5:45 PM 6 111 4 1 2 1 4 213 42 13 3 4 404 Total 74 1016 24 21 33 29 22 1,651 292 163 12 26 3,363 PM Intersection Peak Hour : 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM Intersection PHF : 0.95 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL Volume 32 523 13 13 18 11 11 834 158 80 4 12 1709 PHF 0.80 0.902 0.65 0.361 0.643 0.688 0.688 0.914 0.898 0.69 0.5 0.6 0.95 Movement PHF 0.91 0.53 0.95 0.75 0.95 www.accuratevideocounts.com P.O. Box 261425 San Diego CA 92196 2/2/2015
Turn Count Summary Accurate Video Counts Inc info@accuratevideocounts.com (619) 987-5136 Location: Birch Avenue @ Bear Valley Pkwy Date of Count: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 Analysts: LV/CD Weather: Sunny AVC Proj No: 15-0301 0 / 4 / / / 1 / 0 0 / 0 19 / 13 7 / 21 27 / 7 / 1 / 0 9 / 0 6 / 6 6 / 2 0 / 0 0 / 0 8 / 16 448 / 1,058 5 / 5 3 / 2 18 4 808 602 5 6 Bear Valley Pkwy Birch Avenue 0 0 Time Period PHF 0.92 0.98 Birch Avenue Bear Valley Pkwy 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM www.accuratevideocounts.com P.O. Box 261425 San Diego CA 92196 2/2/2015
Vehicular Count Accurate Video Counts Inc info@accuratevideocounts.com (619) 987-5136 Location: Southbound @ Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL 7:00 AM 1 240 2 1 2 4 0 100 2 7 2 2 363 7:15 AM 0 225 1 0 2 1 2 123 4 4 3 7 372 7:30 AM 11 177 1 4 2 1 3 88 1 12 2 7 309 7:45 AM 6 166 1 4 0 0 0 137 1 4 0 3 322 8:00 AM 5 191 1 4 2 0 0 117 2 12 1 4 339 8:15 AM 2 195 0 0 3 1 4 120 6 2 2 1 336 8:30 AM 0 175 1 2 1 0 1 101 3 4 1 2 291 8:45 AM 1 175 0 1 2 2 1 88 0 3 0 0 273 Total 26 1,544 7 16 14 9 11 874 19 48 11 26 2,605 AM Intersection Peak Hour : Birch Avenue AM Period (7:00 AM - 9:00 AM) Westbound Northbound 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM Bear Valley Pkwy Eastbound Intersection PHF : 0.92 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL Volume 18 808 5 9 6 6 5 448 8 27 7 19 1,366 PHF 0.41 0.84 0.63 0.56 0.75 0.38 0.42 0.82 0.50 0.56 0.58 0.68 0.92 Movement PHF 0.85 0.75 0.84 0.63 0.92 PM Period (4:00 PM - 6:00 PM) Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL 4:00 PM 1 144 0 0 0 1 1 216 1 1 2 2 369 4:15 PM 2 115 0 0 1 0 2 242 2 1 4 1 370 4:30 PM 1 157 0 0 1 1 1 245 4 3 2 2 417 4:45 PM 2 129 0 0 0 1 2 252 3 1 3 1 394 5:00 PM 1 142 3 0 1 2 4 283 3 1 3 2 445 5:15 PM 2 163 3 0 1 0 1 249 1 2 4 4 430 5:30 PM 0 153 0 0 3 0 0 253 6 4 3 1 423 5:45 PM 1 144 0 0 1 0 0 273 6 0 11 6 442 Total 10 1147 6 0 8 5 11 2,013 26 13 32 19 3,290 PM Intersection Peak Hour : 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM Intersection PHF : 0.98 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL Volume 4 602 6 0 6 2 5 1058 16 7 21 13 1740 PHF 0.50 0.923 0.5 ##### 0.5 0.25 0.313 0.935 0.667 0.438 0.477 0.542 0.98 Movement PHF 0.91 0.67 0.93 0.60 0.98 www.accuratevideocounts.com P.O. Box 261425 San Diego CA 92196 2/2/2015
Turn Count Summary Accurate Video Counts Inc info@accuratevideocounts.com (619) 987-5136 Location: Idaho Ave @ Bear Valley Parkway Date of Count: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 Analysts: LV/CD Weather: Sunny AVC Proj No: 13-0080 0 / 0 / / / 0 / 0 0 / 0 121 / 115 32 / 47 1 / 7 / 5 / 3 3 / 6 52 / 44 9 / 4 0 / 0 0 / 0 1 / 7 233 / 885 1 / 5 0 / 3 180 78 784 462 3 3 Bear Valley Parkway Idaho Ave 0 0 Time Period PHF 0.83 0.95 Idaho Ave Bear Valley Parkway 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM www.accuratevideocounts.com P.O. Box 261425 San Diego CA 92196 6/30/2013
Vehicular Count Accurate Video Counts Inc info@accuratevideocounts.com (619) 987-5136 Location: Southbound @ Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right TOTAL 7:00 AM 1 198 22 1 8 1 0 40 0 14 3 0 288 7:15 AM 1 180 39 3 11 1 1 55 0 41 8 0 340 7:30 AM 0 206 63 2 16 1 0 69 1 49 20 1 428 7:45 AM 1 200 56 3 17 0 0 69 0 17 1 0 364 8:00 AM 2 147 26 0 20 2 0 43 0 12 8 1 261 8:15 AM 0 137 23 4 10 0 1 63 0 10 9 0 257 8:30 AM 2 171 23 1 12 2 0 82 0 15 3 1 312 8:45 AM 0 132 30 2 14 1 1 70 2 10 8 2 272 Total 7 1,371 282 16 108 8 3 491 3 168 60 5 2,522 AM Intersection Peak Hour : Idaho Ave AM Period (7:00 AM - 9:00 AM) Westbound Northbound 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM Bear Valley Parkway Eastbound Intersection PHF : 0.83 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right TOTAL Volume 3 784 180 9 52 3 1 233 1 121 32 1 1,420 PHF 0.75 0.95 0.71 0.75 0.76 0.75 0.25 0.84 0.25 0.62 0.40 0.25 0.83 Movement PHF 0.90 0.80 0.84 0.55 0.83 PM Period (4:00 PM - 6:00 PM) Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right TOTAL 4:00 PM 1 103 17 0 6 0 3 198 0 22 6 1 357 4:15 PM 2 133 18 0 3 1 0 210 1 24 9 3 404 4:30 PM 0 123 18 0 6 1 0 187 0 32 14 2 383 4:45 PM 0 100 25 2 8 3 2 216 1 31 15 2 405 5:00 PM 3 117 24 1 8 1 2 235 2 30 13 3 439 5:15 PM 0 122 16 1 17 1 2 230 1 33 7 1 431 5:30 PM 0 123 13 0 11 1 1 204 1 21 12 1 388 5:45 PM 0 92 18 1 8 2 0 220 1 31 9 2 384 Total 6 913 149 5 67 10 10 1,700 7 224 85 15 3,191 PM Intersection Peak Hour : 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM Intersection PHF : 0.95 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right TOTAL Volume 3 462 78 4 44 6 7 885 5 115 47 7 1663 PHF 0.25 0.939 0.78 0.5 0.647 0.5 0.875 0.941 0.625 0.871 0.783 0.583 0.95 Movement PHF 0.94 0.71 0.94 0.88 0.95 www.accuratevideocounts.com P.O. Box 261425 San Diego CA 92196 6/30/2013
Turn Count Summary Accurate Video Counts Inc info@accuratevideocounts.com (619) 987-5136 Location: Pasqual Valley @ Bear Valley Pkwy Date of Count: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 Analysts: LV/CD Weather: Sunny AVC Proj No: 15-0301 0 / 4 / / / 0 / 0 Pasqual Valley 0 / 1 17 / 24 430 / 715 124 / 113 0 / 0 / 0 70 / 81 680 / 585 229 / 128 3 / 7 Pasqual Valley 0 / 0 Bear Valley Pkwy / / / / Bear Valley Pkwy 0 Time Period 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM PHF 0.94 0.92 126 159 366 1,281 81 181 2 1 19 18 614 607 71 90 www.accuratevideocounts.com P.O. Box 261425 San Diego CA 92196 2/2/2015
Vehicular Count Accurate Video Counts Inc info@accuratevideocounts.com (619) 987-5136 Location: Southbound @ Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL 7:00 AM 4 196 20 9 130 30 22 96 20 22 75 4 628 7:15 AM 5 168 20 24 168 44 20 83 28 34 123 1 718 7:30 AM 10 132 12 15 161 58 24 77 27 31 83 3 633 7:45 AM 1 118 20 18 180 82 25 110 40 30 118 7 749 8:00 AM 3 196 19 13 171 45 12 96 31 29 106 6 727 8:15 AM 0 165 27 19 158 34 20 102 30 31 117 2 705 8:30 AM 5 126 11 9 149 44 13 71 17 26 91 2 564 8:45 AM 1 165 13 10 138 41 17 81 21 32 107 3 629 Total 29 1,266 142 117 1,255 378 153 716 214 235 820 28 5,353 AM Intersection Peak Hour : Pasqual Valley AM Period (7:00 AM - 9:00 AM) Westbound Northbound 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM Bear Valley Pkwy Eastbound Intersection PHF : 0.94 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL Volume 19 614 71 70 680 229 81 366 126 124 430 17 2,827 PHF 0.48 0.78 0.89 0.73 0.94 0.70 0.81 0.83 0.79 0.91 0.87 0.61 0.94 Movement PHF 0.81 0.87 0.82 0.90 0.94 PM Period (4:00 PM - 6:00 PM) Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL 4:00 PM 4 144 27 15 142 20 39 229 38 20 127 5 810 4:15 PM 9 105 10 25 144 28 49 300 28 25 155 6 884 4:30 PM 6 185 36 15 134 28 51 344 33 20 183 1 1,036 4:45 PM 2 166 19 19 149 36 43 285 37 41 180 5 982 5:00 PM 1 151 25 22 158 36 38 352 61 27 197 12 1,080 5:15 PM 14 122 9 21 110 27 77 217 41 31 145 9 823 5:30 PM 8 132 20 30 92 18 58 198 35 29 121 2 743 5:45 PM 18 115 6 17 69 25 58 211 26 25 121 5 696 Total 62 1120 152 164 998 218 413 2,136 299 218 1,229 45 7,054 PM Intersection Peak Hour : 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM Intersection PHF : 0.92 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left TOTAL Volume 18 607 90 81 585 128 181 1281 159 113 715 24 3982 PHF 0.50 0.82 0.625 0.81 0.926 0.889 0.887 0.91 0.652 0.689 0.907 0.5 0.92 Movement PHF 0.79 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.92 www.accuratevideocounts.com P.O. Box 261425 San Diego CA 92196 2/2/2015
24 Hour Segment Count Accurate Video Counts Inc info@accuratevideocounts.com (619) 987-5136 Location: Orientation: 1. Bear Valley Pkwy (Oak Drive - Midway Drive) North-South Date of Count: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 Analysts: Weather: DASH Sunny AVC Proj. No: 15-0301 24 Hour Segment Volume 13,220 Time Hourly Volume Hourly Volume Time NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM - 1:00 AM 56 43 99 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM 228 254 482 1:00 AM - 2:00 AM 31 35 66 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM 281 250 531 2:00 AM - 3:00 AM 16 31 47 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM 400 419 819 3:00 AM - 4:00 AM 19 34 53 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM 541 444 985 4:00 AM - 5:00 AM 22 144 166 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 629 422 1,051 5:00 AM - 6:00 AM 63 333 396 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 673 385 1,058 6:00 AM - 7:00 AM 168 732 900 6:00 PM - 7:00 PM 593 341 934 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM 429 780 1,209 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM 394 249 643 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 295 543 838 8:00 PM - 9:00 PM 296 191 487 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM 258 350 608 9:00 PM - 10:00 PM 242 136 378 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM 223 300 523 10:00 PM - 11:00 PM 170 115 285 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM 224 261 485 11:00 PM - 12:00 AM 97 80 177 Total 1,804 3,586 5,390 Total 4,544 3,286 7,830 24-Hour NB Volume 6,348 24-Hour SB Volume 6,872 NB SB Total 1,400 7:00-9:00 4:00-6:00 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 12:00 AM 2:00 AM 4:00 AM 6:00 AM 8:00 AM 10:00 AM 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 8:00 PM 10:00 PM www.accuratevideocounts.com P.O. Box 261425 San Diego CA 92196 2/3/2015