A Theoretical Study in Maximizing Crude Unit Kerosene

Similar documents
Crude Distillation Chapter 4

Increased recovery of straight-run

Optimizing Distillate Yields and Product Qualities. Srini Srivatsan, Director - Coking Technology

CRUDE DISTILLATION. Overview. Purpose To recover light materials. Fractionate into sharp light fractions.

Report. Refining Report. heat removal, lower crude preheat temperature,

Crude Tower Simulation Aspen Plus v8.6. The feedstock to the crude system will be an equal mix of Light, Medium, & Heavy Crude oils.

Crude Evaluation Best Practices

The Advantage of Real Atmospheric Distillation using D7345 Test Method. Presented by Jonathan Cole, PAC

Crude Oil Distillation. Chapter 4

March 7, 1967 J. F. G. ELLIS 3,308,060

Heat Integration in a Crude Distillation Unit Using Pinch Analysis Concepts (AIChE 2008 Spring Meeting 165b)

VISBREAKER MONITORING FOR MAXIMUM CONVERSION

Kolmetz Handbook of Process Equipment Design REFINERY ATMOSPHERIC CRUDE TOWER SELECTION AND SIZING (ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINE)

CHAPTER 2 REFINERY FEED STREAMS: STREAMS FROM THE ATMOSPHERIC AND VACUUM TOWERS

Y. Zak Friedman, Ph.D Principal Consultant

1. Crude oil Atmospheric Distillation Unit

Fouling tendency is a critical

Crude Assay, ASTM, TBP distillations, Evaluation of crude oil properties.

Optimal Model-Based Production Planning for Refinery Operation

Application of the Self-Heat Recuperation Technology to Crude Oil Distillation

Optimal Model-Based Production Planning for Refinery Operation

Distillation in Refining

Converting Visbreakers to Delayed Cokers - An Opportunity for European Refiners

heavy crude blends. Most heavy crudes have higher viscosities,

On-Line Process Analyzers: Potential Uses and Applications

Optimize Energy Recovery in Refineries. Copyright : Evae Andersson

This is the first of two articles

Correlating TBP to Simulated Distillations. COQA Long Beach, CA

Optimal Model-Based Production Planning for Refinery Operation

Bitumen has become an

In 2000, the ConocoPhillips Sweeny, Texas, refinery began

Richard Salliss & Rakesh Mehta New Approach to Refinery Crude Switch Optimization using Profit Suite and Unisim

Deep Cut Vacuum Tower Incentives for Various Crudes

Atmospheric Crude Tower with Aspen HYSYS V8.0

1. Introduction. 2. Challenges. APC Implementation Case Study Implementing Advanced Process Control on Hydrocracker Unit 1

Modernizing a Vintage Cat Cracker. Don Leigh HFC Rahul Pillai KBR Steve Tragesser KBR

New Technologies To Enhance the Distillation Yield of Petroleum Fractionation

CC USE COLUMN DATA TO INFER AND CONTROL CRUDE FRACTIONATION PRODUCT PROPERTIES

D^r i^k_hkfzg\^ bg]b\zmhkl _hk <hgl^i mkzrl IZkZf^m^kl =^lb`g M^lm kng <hg\enlbhgl MZ[e^, DZnlabd Fhl\Z K^_^k^g\^l D^gm FZahg

LCO Processing Solutions. Antoine Fournier

Product Blending & Optimization Considerations. Chapters 12 & 14

Petroleum Refining Fourth Year Dr.Aysar T. Jarullah

Unit 7. Vaccum Distillation of Crude

White Paper. Improving Accuracy and Precision in Crude Oil Boiling Point Distribution Analysis. Introduction. Background Information

MEG/WRI s Partial Bitumen Upgrader Project Adding Value to MEG and Alberta

CHEMSYSTEMS. Report Abstract. Petrochemical Market Dynamics Feedstocks

APC Implementation Case Study Vacuum Gasoil Cloud Point Model Predictive Controller 1

Technology for Producing Clean Diesel Utilizing Moderate Pressure Hydrocracking With Hydroisomerization

Alon Big Springs refinery

Refinery Crude Unit Advanced Control What? Why? How?

Hybrid Model for Optimization Of Crude Distillation Units

Study on Relative CO2 Savings Comparing Ethanol and TAEE as a Gasoline Component

Diesel Maximization: Putting a Straw on the FCC Feed AM Annual Meeting March 22-24, 2015 Marriott Rivercenter San Antonio, TX.

REFINERY PROCESS AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

CHAPTER ELEVEN. Product Blending GASOLINE OCTANE BLENDING

100,000 bpd Refurbished Oil Refinery FOR SALE AND RELOCATION

COMPARISON OF TOTAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION NECESSARY FOR SUBCRITICAL AND SUBCRITICAL SYNTHESIS OF BIODIESEL. S. Glisic 1, 2*, D.

ADVANCED DISTILLATION

Results Certified by Core Labs for Conoco Canada Ltd. Executive summary. Introduction

White Paper.

GC MERGE OF LIGHT ENDS WITH ASTM D7169 BOILING POINT DISTRIBUTION

Product Specification

You have probably noticed that there are several camps

Mini refinery feasibility study

NATIONAL PETROCHEMICAL & REFINERS ASSOCIATION 1899 L STREET, NW, SUITE 1000 WASHINGTON, DC CC

Meeting product specifications

Refinery & Petrochemical Integration- An IOCL Perspective

Maximizing Refinery Margins by Petrochemical Integration

Sensitivity analysis and determination of optimum temperature of furnace for commercial visbreaking unit

Selection of Column Internals - Coker Unit

Changing Refinery Configuration for Heavy and Synthetic Crude Processing

UOP/EMRE Alliance for High Quality Lube and Diesel Production Technology

Preface... xii. 1. Refinery Distillation... 1

High Performance Tray Tower Solutions

Synthesis of Optimal Batch Distillation Sequences

5.0 DIESEL HYDROTREATING UNIT

20,000 bpd CRUDE OIL REFINERY FOR SALE AND RELOCATION

Impact of Processing Heavy Coker Gas Oils in Hydrocracking Units AM Annual Meeting March 21-23, 2010 Sheraton and Wyndham Phoenix, AZ

The Role of the Merox Process in the Era of Ultra Low Sulfur Transportation Fuels. 5 th EMEA Catalyst Technology Conference 3 & 4 March 2004

FAST TRACK PRODUCTION SOLUTIONS. Early Production Facilities Field Diesel Units Crude Oil Topping Units Gasoline Refineries

Characterization of crude:

SOLVENT DEASPHALTING OPTIONS How SDA can increase residue upgrading margins

New Residue Up-grading Complex at European Refinery Achieves Euro 5 Specifications

Waste Lubricating Oil Purification and Recovery

Thermal cracking Introduction

Bottom of Barrel Processing. Chapters 5 & 8

PWH API 610 SINGLE STAGE OH2

Investment Planning of an Integrated Petrochemicals Complex & Refinery A Best Practice Approach

Recent increases in hydraulic

Energy costs are the largest

OIL REFINERY PROCESSES

NEW METHODOLOGY OF DETERMINATION OF BOILING POINT AT VERY LOW PRESSURE: PETROLEUM CASE

Maximizing Bottom-of-the Barrel Conversion with Commercially Proven Technologies. Jacinthe Frécon

Regional Energy Trade and Refining Industry in Northeast Asia

Lecture 3: Petroleum Refining Overview

TechnipFMC RFCC Technology converts bunker fuels into high value products for African refiners

Solvent Deasphalting Conversion Enabler

Optimization of Toluene-Benzene Reactor

Mild Hydrocracking using IsoTherming Technology

Crude and vacuum distillation

Transcription:

A Theoretical Study in Maximizing Crude Unit Kerosene Introduction W. Doug McDaniel, MPEC, Inc., Feb. 26, 2014, Ver. 1 (email address: wdmcdaniel@mpec-inc.com) Not long ago I was asked how low the D-86 90% point of a Crude Unit overhead naphtha stream should be for a good Crude Unit operation where kerosene was worth substantially more than naphtha. I had seen what I considered both good and bad operations, but wasn t really sure. I knew typical numbers, but I hadn t ever done a study to document how low it should be, or how much kerosene could be recovered from a typical crude, both theoretically, and practically. This exercise was intended to fill in that knowledge gap. Summary Conclusion It turns out that surprisingly large amounts of kerosene are not normally being recovered due to the fairly poor fractionation typical in most existing Crude Units. Per this exercise, assuming a 105 F flash kerosene with a 550 F D-86 endpoint, and 100,000 BPSD of a sample light crude (~39 API gravity), only 26,185 BPSD of dry kerosene is produced out of 33,900 BPSD theoretically possible with infinite fractionation. This exercise further shows two possible configurations that increase kerosene to 28,940 BPSD by adding a Kerosene Fractionator to the Crude Unit, and further to 32,760 by adding an additional Diesel Fractionator. Adding just the Kerosene Fractionator decreases the naphtha make by 2,500 BPSD. (The rest of the additional kerosene comes from diesel, resulting in a loss of 78 BPSD of diesel to AGO.) If the 2,500 BPSD upgrade of naphtha to kerosene is valued at $20/BBL (ignoring the diesel loss), then this is worth $17.5 MM/Yr. The total duty of the Kerosene Fractionator s reboiler is substantial at 59.9 MM BTU/Hr, but using 75% efficiency and $4/MM BTU, this only amounts to $2.7 MM/Yr. Eliminating the Kerosene Steam Stripper also saves 10,000 #/Hr of steam worth $0.4 MM/Yr at $5.0/M#. Since this is a net value of $15.2 MM/Yr, it would seem that this idea should be well worth pursuing, especially if an idle column is available. If kerosene is more highly valued than diesel, then adding the Diesel Fractionator might also be beneficial. Adding the Diesel Fractionator recovers 441 BPSD more naphtha to kerosene, but it also loses 1,569 BDSD of additional diesel to AGO. Maximum Theoretical Recovery Table 1 and Figures 1A through 2B present two exercises of determining maximum theoretical kerosene recovery with infinite fractionation. Both exercises assume a front-end limiting kerosene flash point specification of 105 F. In Exercise 1 (at the top of Table 1, and graphed on Figures 1A in F and 1B in C), the limiting kerosene D-86 EP of 550 F was used, and in Exercise 2 (at the bottom of Table 1, and graphed on Tables 2A in F and 2B in C) a lighter limiting kerosene D-86 EP of 515 F was used. Page 1 of 11 This publication is the intellectual property of MPEC, Inc., Houston, Texas

By infinite fractionation definition, all the product TBP s fall directly on top of the crude TBP. Assuming starting and ending LV% kerosene cutpoints on crude, the D-86 distillation curve was then hand calculated from the TBP using the 1963 ASTM conversion method (which MPEC prefers). This was redone by trial-and-error until the resulting D-86 5% point was 324 F (consistent with a 105 F flash point by correlation), and the D-86 EP was the desired 550 F or 515 F. The cutpoint between LPG and LSR was set at 65 F, and the cutpoint between LSR and HSR naphtha was set at 187 F. The TBP s of the LSR, HSR, and Debut Btms (LSR+HSR) were then also defined as equal to the crude TBP, and they were converted to D-86 s. As seen in Exercise 1 of Table 1 and Figures 1A &1B for 550 F EP kerosene, the 90% D- 86 point of the lightest possible Debut Btms utilizing infinite fractionation would be 234.0 F, and the kerosene cutpoints for this particular example light crude would be from 22.6 to 56.5 LV%, yielding 33.9 LV% on crude. As seen in Exercise 2 of Table 1 and Figures 2A & 2B, making the lighter 515 F endpoint kerosene decreases recovery greatly from the back-end, but only slightly from the front-end. In Exercise 2, the 90% D-86 point of the lightest possible Debut Btms utilizing infinite fractionation would be 237.5 F, and the kerosene cutpoints would be from 23.1 to 53.1 LV%, yielding 30.0 LV% of crude. Typical Crude Column Maximizing Kerosene Figure 3 summarizes a PRO/II run of a typical good Crude Unit operation to maximize kerosene with a 105 F flash and a 550 F D-86 EP, consistent with Exercise 1 above. Even though this operation probably has more theoretical stages and OH reflux than most crude columns, note that the 90% D-86 point for the Deb Btms (from the OH Naphtha) is 263 F, or 29 F higher than theoretically possible. Note too, that the dry kerosene yield is much lower than theoretical at only 26,185 BPSD from 100,000 BPSD of charge, for 26.2 LV% on crude (vs. 33.9 LV% theoretical). This yield is shown on Figures 1A & 1B as the Kero Yield Per Typical PRO/II Run line. Maximizing Kerosene by Adding a Kerosene Fractionator Figure 4 summarizes a PRO/II run of the same typical Crude Unit, but with a 12 Ø Kerosene Fractionator replacing the 6.5 Ø Kerosene Stripper. This does not recover all the theoretical kerosene, but it is a first-pass, not-yet-optimized attempt to put what is practical into perspective for recovering naphtha to kerosene without trying to recover diesel to kerosene. As seen, this recovers 28,940 BPSD of dry kerosene, or 28.9 LV% of crude. This yield is shown on Figures 1A & 1B as the Kero Yield Per PRO/II Run w 1 New Frac line. To achieve this, heavy naphtha has been dropped down to the kerosene draw for much sharper fractionation OH in the Kerosene Fractionator. This recovers 2,500 BPSD of naphtha into kerosene. Holding the kerosene endpoint constant at 550 F, 223 BPSD of diesel is also moved to kerosene, as well. Holding the 640 F 90% point on diesel requires the loss of some diesel to AGO, but this loss is only 78 BPSD. The total duty of the new Kerosene Fractionator is substantial at 59.9 MM BTU/Hr, but using 75% efficiency and $4/MM BTU, this only amounts to $2.7 MM/Yr. This can also be partially Page 2 of 11 This publication is the intellectual property of MPEC, Inc., Houston, Texas

offset by integrating the new column s OH condenser and reboiler into the Crude Unit s exchanger system for crude preheat and product cooling. Eliminating the Kerosene Steam Stripper also saves 10,000 #/Hr of steam worth $0.4 MM/Yr at $5.0/M#. Making the lighter Crude Column OH has greatly increased offgas from the OH Receiver, but this gets reabsorbed by compressing it to 50 psig and recontacting it with the OH naphtha. Since this additional compression requires only 285 additional BHP, its incremental cost at 10 /KWH is only $0.2 MM/Yr. Maximizing Kerosene with an Additional Diesel Fractionator Figure 5 summarizes a PRO/II run of the same typical Crude Unit, but with 12 Ø fractionators replacing both the 6.5 Ø Kerosene and Diesel Side Strippers. This has still not recovered all the theoretical kerosene, but, again, it is only a first-pass, not-yet-optimized attempt to put what is practical into perspective. As seen, this recovers 32,759 BPSD of dry kerosene, or 32.8 LV% of crude. This yield is shown on Figures 1A & 1B as the Kero Yield Per PRO/II Run w 2 New Frac s line. To achieve this additional recovery, heavy kerosene has been dropped down to the diesel draw for much sharper fractionation OH in the Diesel Fractionator. The total duty of the new Kerosene Fractionator and the Diesel Fractionator reboilers is substantial at 102.2 MM BTU/Hr, but using 75% efficiency and $4/MM BTU, this only amounts to $4.6 MM/Yr. This can also be partially offset by integrating the new column s OH condensers and reboilers into the Crude Unit s exchanger system for crude preheat and product cooling. Eliminating the Steam Strippers also saves 12,500 #/Hr of steam worth $0.5 MM/Yr at $5.0/M#. When kerosene and diesel are evenly valued, the only purpose of the Diesel Fractionator is to recover diesel to kerosene so that more naphtha can be recovered to kerosene, and this option recovers 441 BPSD of additional naphtha as kerosene. However, Figure 5 shows that taking so much kerosene out of diesel, while maintaining the diesel D-86 90% point at 640 F, has greatly decreased diesel yield and increased the dry AGO yield by an additional 1,565 BPSD. It may be that diesel with a heavier 90% point than 640 F can still be made as viable product. For instance, if substantial kerosene is blended into the Refinery s diesel product, then it is only the blended Refinery diesel product that must be maintained at the 90% point, substantially reducing this loss to AGO. If diesel is recovered in the Vacuum Unit, it may also be that AGO can be routed to the Vacuum Unit s HVGO PA for better splitting between diesel and AGO than can be done in the Crude Column to further offset this loss. If none of these heavier diesel options are viable, then the economics of the Diesel Fractionator will probably not merit its installation. Of course, optimization of any new fractionators will greatly depend on your particular crude TBP, Crude Unit configuration, product values, product specifications, product blending, and utility costs. Page 3 of 11 This publication is the intellectual property of MPEC, Inc., Houston, Texas

Table 1 "Hand" Method for Maximum Possible Kerosene Yield Exercise 1 - See Figures 1A & 1B Crude TBP Assume Max Kero D-86 LPG's LSR Naph Hvy Naph Kerosene Example Light Crude EP of 550 F (288 C) LV% F C LV% F C LV% F C LV% F C (PRO/II Input) 0 65 18.3 0 187 86.1 0 262 127.8 0 579 303.9 LV% C F 3 65 18.3 13.5 187 86.1 22.6 262 127.8 56.5 579 303.9 0.00-161.49-258.68 3-148 -100.0 13.5-148 -100.0 22.6-148 -100.0 56.5-148 -100.0 0.01-88.60-127.48 0.35-42.04-43.67 0.72-11.72 10.90 Convert LSR TBP to D-86 Per ASTM 1963 (By Hand) LV% on Convert Deb Btms TBP to D-86 Per ASTM 1963 (By Hand) LV% on 2.06-0.50 31.10 LV% TBP F TBP F 50% D86 F D-86 F Crude TBP D-86 C LV% TBP F TBP F 50% D86 F D-86 F Crude TBP D-86 C 3.50 27.84 82.12 0 65.0 25.00 10.0 112.0 3.00 44.4 0 65.0 35.00 16.0 126.0 3.00 52.2 4.75 36.07 96.93 10 90.0 23.00 10.0 122.0 4.05 50.0 10 100.0 43.00 24.0 142.0 4.96 61.1 5.00 37.78 100.00 30 113.0 24.00 14.0 132.0 6.15 55.6 30 143.0 37.00 22.0 166.0 8.88 74.4 10.00 68.33 155.00 50 137.0 9.00 146.0 8.25 63.3 50 180.0 8.00 188.0 12.80 86.7 20.00 116.11 241.00 70 157.5 20.50 13.0 159.0 10.35 70.6 70 213.0 33.00 22.0 210.0 16.72 98.9 30.00 160.00 320.00 90 177.5 20.00 14.0 173.0 12.45 78.3 90 245.5 32.50 24.0 234.0 20.64 112.2 40.00 210.00 410.00 100 187.0 9.50 8.0 181.0 13.50 82.8 100 262.0 16.50 14.0 248.0 22.60 120.0 50.00 265.56 510.00 60.00 326.67 620.00 Convert HSR TBP to D-86 Per ASTM 1963 (By Hand) LV% on Convert Kero TBP to D-86 Per ASTM 1963 (By Hand) LV% on 70.00 393.33 740.00 LV% TBP F TBP F 50% D86 F D-86 F Crude TBP D-86 C LV% TBP F TBP F 50% D86 F D-86 F Crude TBP D-86 C 80.00 465.56 870.00 0 187.0 7.00 2.5 212.5 13.50 100.3 0 262.0 26.00 11.0 319.0 22.60 159.4 90.00 565.56 1050.00 10 194.0 16.00 7.0 215.0 14.41 101.7 10 288.0 55.00 32.0 330.0 25.99 165.6 95.00 648.89 1200.00 30 210.0 14.00 8.0 222.0 16.23 105.6 30 343.0 61.00 42.0 362.0 32.77 183.3 98.00 732.22 1350.00 50 224.0 6.00 230.0 18.05 110.0 50 404.0 0.00 404.0 39.55 206.7 100.00 815.56 1500.00 70 241.0 17.00 10.0 240.0 19.87 115.6 70 471.0 67.00 52.0 456.0 46.33 235.6 90 255.0 14.00 9.5 249.5 21.69 120.8 90 541.0 70.00 60.0 516.0 53.11 268.9 100 262.0 7.00 6.0 255.5 22.60 124.2 100 579.0 38.00 34.0 550.0 56.50 287.8 Graph PRO/II Kero Yield Ranges - 550 F EP Typical Run: LV% F C Exercise 2 - See Figures 2A & 2B Start 25.642 60.00 20.00 Assume Lower Kero D-86 LPG's LSR Naph Hvy Naph Kerosene Start 25.642 20.00 0.00 EP of 515 F (268 C) LV% F C LV% F C LV% F C LV% F C End 51.827 60.00 20.00 0 65 18.3 0 187 86.1 0 266 130.0 0 543 283.9 End 51.827 20.00 0.00 3 65 18.3 13.5 187 86.1 23.1 266 130.0 53.1 543 283.9 Start 25.642 40.00 10.00 3-148 -100.0 13.5-148 -100.0 23.1-148 -100.0 53.1-148 -100.0 End 51.827 40.00 10.00 Max w 2 Frac: LV% F C Convert LSR TBP to D-86 Per ASTM 1963 (By Hand) LV% on Convert Deb Btms TBP to D-86 Per ASTM 1963 (By Hand) LV% on Start 22.694-20.00-40.00 LV% TBP F TBP F 50% D86 F D-86 F Crude TBP D-86 C LV% TBP F TBP F 50% D86 F D-86 F Crude TBP D-86 C Start 22.694-60.00-60.00 0 65.0 25.00 10.0 112.0 3.00 44.4 0 65.0 36.00 17.0 126.5 3.00 52.5 End 55.453-20.00-40.00 10 90.0 23.00 10.0 122.0 4.05 50.0 10 101.0 44.00 24.0 143.5 5.01 61.9 End 55.453-60.00-60.00 30 113.0 24.00 14.0 132.0 6.15 55.6 30 145.0 36.50 22.0 167.5 9.03 75.3 Start 22.694-40.00-50.00 50 137.0 9.00 146.0 8.25 63.3 50 181.5 8.00 189.5 13.05 87.5 End 55.453-40.00-50.00 70 157.5 20.50 13.0 159.0 10.35 70.6 70 217.0 35.50 24.0 213.5 17.07 100.8 90 177.5 20.00 14.0 173.0 12.45 78.3 90 249.5 32.50 24.0 237.5 21.09 114.2 Max w 1 Frac: LV% F C 100 187.0 9.50 8.0 181.0 13.50 82.8 100 266.0 16.50 13.5 251.0 23.10 121.7 Start 23.142 20.00-10.00 Start 23.142-20.00-30.00 Convert HSR TBP to D-86 Per ASTM 1963 (By Hand) LV% on Convert Kero TBP to D-86 Per ASTM 1963 (By Hand) LV% on End 52.082 20.00-10.00 LV% TBP F TBP F 50% D86 F D-86 F Crude TBP D-86 C LV% TBP F TBP F 50% D86 F D-86 F Crude TBP D-86 C End 52.082-20.00-30.00 0 187.0 7.00 2.5 215.5 13.50 101.9 0 266.0 23.50 10.0 319.0 23.10 159.4 Start 23.142 0.00-20.00 10 194.0 16.00 7.0 218.0 14.46 103.3 10 289.5 48.00 26.0 329.0 26.10 165.0 End 52.082 0.00-20.00 30 210.0 16.00 8.0 225.0 16.38 107.2 30 337.5 53.50 36.0 355.0 32.10 179.4 50 226.0 7.00 233.0 18.30 111.7 50 391.0 0.00 391.0 38.10 199.4 Infinite Frac: LV% F C 70 244.0 18.00 11.0 244.0 20.22 117.8 70 449.0 58.00 44.0 435.0 44.10 223.9 Start 22.600-80.00-80.00 90 258.0 14.00 9.5 253.5 22.14 123.1 90 511.0 62.00 52.0 487.0 50.10 252.8 End 56.500-80.00-80.00 100 266.0 8.00 7.0 260.5 23.10 126.9 100 543.0 32.00 28.0 515.0 53.10 268.3 Page 4 of 11 This publication is the intellectual property of MPEC, Inc., Houston, Texas. WDM 2/20/2015 Maximizing Kero 1.xls - Table 1

750 Figure 1A ( F) Maximum Kero - By Hand Assuming 550 F Max Kero EP (Table 1, Exercise 1) 700 650 600 550 500 450 Kero D 86 400 324 F @ 5 LV% D 86 = 105 F Flash 350 300 250 HSR D 86 Crude TBP 200 150 Debut Btms D 86 100 LSR D 86 Assume 550 F Kero EP D 86 50 0-50 -100 Kero Yield Per Typical PRO/II Run = 26.2 LV% Kero Yield Per PRO/II Run w 1 New Frac = 28.9 LV% Kero Yield Per PRO/II Run w 2 New Frac's = 32.8 LV% Kero Yield Infinite Fractionation = 33.9 LV% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LV % OVER Page 5 of 11 This publication is the intellectual property of MPEC Inc., Houston, Texas. WDM 2/20/2015 Maximizing Kero 1.xls Figure 1A

400 Figure 1B ( C) Maximum Kero - By Hand Assuming 288 C Max Kero EP (Table 1, Exercise 1) 350 300 250 200 162.2 C @ 5 LV% D 86 = 40.6 F Flash Kero Kero D 86 150 HSR D 86 Crude TBP 100 Debut Btms D 86 50 0-50 LSR D 86 Assume 287.8 C Kero EP D 86 Kero Yield Per Typical PRO/II Run = 26.2 LV% Kero Yield Per PRO/II Run w 1 New Frac = 28.9 LV% Kero Yield Per PRO/II Run w 2 New Fracs = 32.8 LV% Kero Yield Infinite Fractionation = 33.9 LV% -100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LV % OVER Page 6 of 11 This publication is the intellectual property of MPEC, Inc., Houston, Texas. WDM 2/20/2015 Maximizing Kero 1.xls Figure 1B

750 Figure 2A ( F) Maximum Kero - By Hand Assuming 515 F Kero EP (Table 1, Exercise 2) 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 324 F @ 5 LV% D 86 = 105 F Flash Kero D 86 300 250 HSR D 86 Crude TBP 200 150 Debut Btms D 86 100 50 LSR D 86 Assume 515 F Kero EP 0-50 -100 Kero Yield Infinite Fractionation = 30.0 LV% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LV % OVER Page 7 of 11 This publication is the intellectual property of MPEC, Inc., Houston, Texas. WDM 2/20/2015 Maximizing Kero 1.xls Figure 2A

400 Figure 2B ( C) Maximum Kero - By Hand Assuming 268 C Kero EP (Table 1, Exercise 2) 350 300 250 200 162.2 C @ 5 LV% D 86 = 40.6 F Flash Kero Kero D 86 150 HSR D 86 Crude TBP 100 Debut Btms D 86 50 LSR D 86 0 Assume Current Kero EP -50 Kero Yield Infinite Fractionation = 30.0 LV% -100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LV % OVER Page 8 of 11 This publication is the intellectual property of MPEC, Inc., Houston, Texas. WDM 2/20/2015 Maximizing Kero 1.xls Figure 2B