Refining Fitness Check Concawe Step 2 data Highlights

Similar documents
Examining the cost burden imposed on European refining by EU legislation

EU Refining Sector Fitness Check

IED RELATING TO OIL AND GAS BURNERS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE

The Prime Glass DeNOx solutions in the present scenario of the glass industry NOx containment technologies

Operational eco-efficiency in Refineries

2007 Chevron and John Zink Company, LLC

Increased flexibility of refineries by O 2 enrichment. Sulphur recovery and new opportunities.

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

Emission control at marine terminals

Providing clean DPF technology for Iran. Soot-free Teheran

Future Technology Trends in Heavy Duty Commercial Vehicle Diesel Engines February 26 th, 2013

Tier III considerations

What is the impact of changing patterns in energy markets on EU competitiveness? A refining industry perspective

Collection and Analysis of Data for the Review required under Article 30(9) of Directive 2010/75/EU on Industrial Emissions (IED)

TEPCO s Emission Control Measures (in Thermal Power Plants) September 7, 2013 Toyoto Matsuoka Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) 东京电力公司

DANIEL LEUCKX. Recent and proposed legislative developments. PLATTS, Middle Distillates 4 th Annual Conference. Policy Executive, EUROPIA

Challenges for sustainable freight transport Maritime transport. Elena Seco Gª Valdecasas Director Spanish Shipowners Association - ANAVE


BDC Symposium Ottawa, September 29, 2015

Curbing emissions and energy consumption in the transport sector how can we deal with it in Warsaw 2012 Annual POLIS Conference

Legislation in the European Union and the impact on existing plant

Schwechat Refinery Visit

Challenges and Opportunities in Managing CO 2 in Petroleum Refining

A pathway for the evolution of the refining industry and liquid fuels in Europe

EUROMOT. Recommendation for emission limit values and definition of stationary engines. Angers, 02 October Panagiotis Daskalopoulos, Euromot

TFEIP/ EIONET meeting Ghent 2014 The challenges of estimating Mercury emissions

A portfolio of power-trains for Europe: a fact-based analysis

Emission controls for NOx compliance Challenges & Applications. Greener Shipping Summit November 2017

Evaluation of Directive 98/70/EC Fuel quality Directive (FQD) Study for:

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 222 PETROLEUM INDUSTRY OUTLOOK (July 1999)

Criterias for August 2014 Procurement of small vehicles for municipal cleaning

Low Sulphur Fuel Oils Preliminary Estimated Costs to Canadian Industry based on European Data

Vapor Recovery Developments in Emission Standards and Applications

Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems America. Coal to Gas Conversions

Refining impact of the IMO bunker fuel sulphur decision

Emission Reduction Technologies towards zero emissions

GASCO Habshan SRUs - Challenges of Operation. Abdulkader Ahmed Al Kasem, Jumaa Al Marzouqi

Maximizing Refinery Margins by Petrochemical Integration

Toyota. Stephen Stacey - General Manager Arjan Dijkhuizen - Senior Engineer. Government & Technical Affairs Toyota Motor Europe TOYOTA MOTOR EUROPE

C C A. Combustion Components Associates, Inc.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION. Quality of petrol and diesel fuel used for road transport in the European Union

Financing and roadmap for roll-out of clean inland ship technologies

INTEGRATION TRENDS OF PROPULSION SYSTEMS

Environmental Expenditures. by the U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Industry

AP1 EEA31 emissions of SO 2

Eco-Fact PETROTEL-LUKOIL. Deputy General Manager Dan Danulescu

Vasilikos Power Station

MEETING ULTRA-LOW SULPHUR DIOXIDE (SO 2 ) EMISSIONS LIMITS THE REGENERABLE WAY

Background document prepared by the Lower. Olefins Sector Group of CEFIC on the BAT conclusions. for lower olefins in the LVOC BREF

UniCRE UNIPETROL Centre of Research & Education. Datum Autor Projekt

California s Success in Controlling Large Industrial Sources

DIOXIDE REMOVAL FROM STACK GASES

European Refining Outlook to 2030: Technical & Economic Challenges

EU SUSTAINABLE ENERGY WEEK JUNE Prof. Dr Ozren Ocić. 22 June Energy

Synergies between Refining and Petrochemicals : Today and Tomorrow

Diesel for the Future

Low sulphur bunker fuel oil : what are the options?

Austria. Advanced Motor Fuels Statistics

Bio-Renewable Fuels: Green Diesel

Control of gaseous emissions and dust in a single-step solution

Is a 10-ppm sulphur limit on road fuels desirable?

GLASSMAN EUROP CERCAT : A Technology for Air Pollution Control. Process, Construction & Performances

ICI Boiler NOx & SO 2

NGC Emissions Calculator Methodology (United Kingdom)

Automotive sector the driver of future PGM demand PDAC March 2005 Bob Gilmour Overview

IMPACTS OF THE IMO SULPHUR REGULATIONS ON THE CANADIAN CRUDE OIL MARKET

REACTORS C 0.2 barg STEAM SULPHUR PIT. Figure 4.11: Simplified process flow diagram of a sulphur recovery unit (CLAUS) unit

Emission Reduction Program (ERP) For Existing Pulverized Fuel Fired Thermal Power Plants

Waste-Based Biodiesel Market in 2016

Transitioning to low carbon / low fossil fuels and energy sources for road transport

Clean Up Your Fleet. for lower emissions, better air quality. Introducing a practical approach to cleaner, more efficient fleet operation

Evolution of Advanced Emissions Control System to meet NOx and Particulates Regulations

BIODIESEL CHAINS. Biofuels in Poland

Motor Vehicle Emissions and the Government Response

Urban Air Quality and Diesel Cars

ME 74 AUTOMOTIVE POLLUTION AND CONTROL Automobile Engineering-vii sem Question Bank( )

RULE NOX REDUCTIONS FROM MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES (Adopted 12/13/2016)

Vehicle Emissions Standards, Fuel Quality, Air Pollution and Health

Anna Petre. Manager Government Relations, Saab Automobile

Financial Statements Matti Lievonen, President & CEO 7 February 2017

Availability of Marine Fuels from EU refining

PERSPECTIVES FOR THE BRAZILIAN REFINING INDUSTRY

NOx Reduction Technologies for 2-stroke Diesel Engines to Meet IMO Tier III

INTERNATIONATIONAL CONFERENCE BIOENERGY POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IN AFRICA. Fringilla, Lusaka 26 th -28th May 2009

MECHANISM OF NOx CONTROL

The Need For and Potential Benefits of Advanced Technology Vehicles in China

H.R. Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008

Effect of SOx and NOx Regulation Implementation, ECA s and NOx Tier III Current Developments in General

Evaluating the Long-Term Performance of Composite Wear Rings in Centrifugal Pumps. Robert Aronen, Boulden International Martin Russek, Sunoco

Acomprehensive analysis was necessary to

2018 Biofuels from Landfill & Waste Water Plant. (17 th October)

Changes in Bunker Fuel Quality Impact on European and Russian Refiners

EffShip. Love Hagström D.E.C. Marine AB

A submission to European Commission, Secretariat-General, 1049 Brussels

Environmental and EnergyStrategies for Freight Transport. Dipl.-Ing. Håkan Samuelsson, Chairman of the MAN Nutzfahrzeuge Gruppe

Neste. Sustainable Growth through Innovation. Dr. Lars Peter Lindfors, Senior Vice President, Technology.

Production of Transportation Fuels by Co-processing Biomass-Derived Pyrolysis Oils in a Petroleum Refinery Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit

Emissions Legislation

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to A key to understanding the future of marine bunkers and fuel oil markets

Venice s Green Refinery: process and products innovation. Giacomo Rispoli

Transcription:

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE FOR THE EUROPEAN REFINING INDUSTRY Refining Fitness Check Concawe Step 2 data Highlights Concawe Symposium Brussels 24 February 2015 C. Caiado, Research Associate

Concawe data collection Concawe questionnaire was based on data requested by JRC 1. IPPC* and LCPD** sheet Data requested for every year from 1998 to 2012 Total annual CAPEX in K for air emissions abatement Total annual CAPEX in K for water emissions abatement Indicate whether CAPEX and/or OPEX were incurred for selected emission abatement measures 45 responses required Choice between Yes, No, Data Unavailable, Not Applicable Total of 705 cell entries for each refinery! *IPPC: Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control ** LCPD: Large Combustion Plants Directive Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 2

IPPC-LCPD sheet Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 3

Concawe data collection 2. RED sheet Data requested for every year from 1998 to 2012 Total annual CAPEX in K for biofuels infrastructure On-site (within refinery fenceline) Off-site depots Itemised by type of biofuel: BioMethanol BioEthanol BioMTBE BioETBE BioDiesel Other Total of 90 cell entries for the refinery s on-site CAPEX, plus 90 cell entries for each off-site depot Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 4

RED sheet Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 5

Aggregation Groups (Solomon methodology) EU-28 EU-15 EU-13 Nine Geographical Regions Petrochemical Integrated Sites Five Complexity Groups: Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data 1 x Hydroskimming + Thermal group 4 x Gas Oil Conversion (GOC) groups defined by Complexity Factor 67 refineries responded to the questionnaire Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 6

Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data EU-28 Refineries 95 mainstream refineries operating in 1998, dropping to 85 in 2012 82 Mainstream refineries operating in September 2014 Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 7

Number of Operating Refineries Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data EU-28 Refinery Complexity Groups 100 90 80 70 60 10 10 11 11 14 14 14 14 18 18 22 22 23 16 16 18 18 19 19 23 23 20 20 17 17 19 19 14 14 14 14 20 20 19 18 23 29 Closures per complexity group C, 2 D, 1 HS, 4 50 40 30 20 17 17 17 17 19 31 31 26 26 28 28 24 24 20 20 16 16 13 17 19 14 10 10 A, 3 10 0 21 21 21 21 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 17 15 Since 2012: 2013 -> 2 closures (A and HS Groups) 2014 -> 1 closure (A Group) HS A B C D Refineries have become more complex Note: Cartagena refinery as an D refinery from 2008 to 2011 Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 8

Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data Air & Water Emission Abatement Measures Million Euros EU-28 Average CAPEX per Responding Refinery 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 IPPC and LCPD implementation for existing installations 2007 and 2008 respectively 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Air emissions Water emissions Total of 4.7 Billion EUR CAPEX from 1998 to 2012 Increase in CAPEX intensity after 2006: On average, each responding refinery invested 6.8 MEUR per year since 2006 82% of the investments were in air abatement measures Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 9

Annual CAPEX per Complexity Group / Total annual CAPEX (%) Total CAPEX invested MEUR/year Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data Air & Water Emissions Abatement Measures Annual CAPEX per Complexity Group 600 500 400 300 200 100 Complexity group D registered the biggest amount of Capex across the entire period (39% of Total Capex) 0 HS A B C D Complexity group HS was the least Capex intensive 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Note: Cartagena refinery as a D complexity type refinery from 2008 to 2011 HS A B C D Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 10

Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data Air & Water Emissions Abatement Measures CAPEX & OPEX: Positive responses for costs in a given category % OF CAPEX RESPONSES % OF OPEX RESPONSES VOCs 9% CO 2% CO 14% Water Emissions 26% SOx Emissions 36% VOCs 22% Sox 50% Dust and Metals 8% NOx Emissions 19% Dust and Metals 12% Nox 2% More than 60% of these positive responses were for costs incurred in the 2007-2012 period Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 11

% of refineries responding "YES" Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data EU-28 Air Emission Abatement Measures SOx emissions abatement measures incurring annual CAPEX and/or OPEX 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 SOx reducing catalyst additives Use of low sulphur feedstock OPEX (FCC) Use of low sulphur feedstock CAPEX (FCC) Use of gas to replace liquid fuel Amine treatment of refinery fuel gas (RFG) Use of low sulphur refinery fuel oil (RFO) Acid gas removal e.g. by amine treating Sulphur recovery units (SRU) Tail gas treatment unit (TGTU) Average 2000-2006 Average 2007-2012 Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 12

Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data % of refineries responding "YES" 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 EU-28 Air Emission Abatement Measures NOx emissions abatement measures incurring annual CAPEX and/or OPEX Air and/or fuel staging Flue-gas recirculation Use of low-nox burners (LNB) Average 2000-2006 Average 2007-2012 % of responding refineries who reported costs in the given category Specific additives for NOx reduction Other less used abatement measures include: Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) FCC Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) (FCC/Calcining unit/comb. Units) Air and/or fuel staging Flue-gas recirculation Diluent injection Use of low-nox burners (LNB) Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) (comb. Units) Low temperature NOx oxidation (using ozone) (Comb units/fcc) SNOx combined technique Specific additives for NOx reduction Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 13

% of refineries responding "YES" Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data EU-28 Air Emission Abatement Measures CO, Dust or VOCs emissions abatement measures incurring annual CAPEX and/or OPEX 80 70 60 Other less implemented abatement measures include: 50 40 30 20 10 Carbon monoxide (CO) boiler Third stage blowback filter (FCC) Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) (combustion unit) Centrifugal washers 0 Catalysts with CO oxidation promoters Use of an attritionresistant catalyst Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) FCC Multistage cyclone separators FCC Vapour recovery by condensation, absorption, adsorption, membrane separation, or hybrid systems Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) programmes Average 2000-2006 Average 2007-2012 Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 14

% of refineries responding "YES" Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data EU-28 Water Emissions Abatement Measures Waste water treatments incurring annual CAPEX 50 40 30 20 10 0 Primary water treatment covers and treatment of offgases Average 2000-2006 Average 2007-2012 Secondary water treatment Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 15

Million Euros per responding refinery Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data Renewable Energy Directive (Biofuels) Additional Storage Capacity and Infrastructure EU-28 Average CAPEX per Refinery (including off-site depots) 1.5 * Simple average of total reported cost divided by 67 responding refineries 1.0 2009/28/EC (RED) Dec. 2010 0.5 0.0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 16

biomethanol biomtbe bioetbe Other (On site) biodiesel bioethanol Depots: bioethanol Depots: biodiesel Million Euro Renewable Energy Directive (Biofuels) Additional Storage Capacity and Infrastructure Total CAPEX per type of Investment Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data 1998-2012 4.5% 6.1% 3.4% 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 15.9% 0.4% 29.8% biomethanol bioetbe biodiesel Depots: bioethanol 39.9% biomtbe Other (On site) bioethanol Depots: biodiesel Total of 470 Million EUR invested since 2000 70% of the investments were in biodiesel and bioethanol on-site facilities Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 17

Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data CONCLUSIONS 95 refineries operating in 1998 dropping to 82 in 2014 Refineries have become more complex in the last years 4.7 Billion EUR of capital expenditure in Air & Water emissions abatement measures (1998-2012) Largest share of the investments took place after 2006 (when relevant regulation for the sector came into force) 82% of the reported Capex was in Air abatement measures Investments related to SOx emissions were the most widely implemented Biofuels infrastructure projects followed the trend of increasing Capex after 2006 Total of MEUR invested in biofuels infrastructure since 2000 70% of the investments were in biodiesel and bioethanol on-site facilities Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 18

Refining Fitness Check: Step 2 data Thank You! Questions? Concawe Symposium, 24 February 2015 19