Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Matt Williams Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University January 6, 2009

Similar documents
Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends

EVALUATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTS APPLIED ON PERENNIAL RYEGRASS DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA SUBMITTED BY: SPONSORED BY: AND

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

(TURF1402) Site Description Page 1 of 5 University of GA Coop Ext Service Poa annua Control in Overseeded 'Tifway' Bermudagrass.

University of GA Coop Ext Service

Planting Date: Planting Method: Broadcast Rate: 10 lb/1000 sq ft

Final Report: Segway X2 Traffic Study (2007)

(TURF2002) AOV Means Table Page 1 of 2 University of Georgia, CES Crabgrass Control in Bermudagrass with Preemergence Herbicides.

2 CGA WG 10 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a. 3 CGA WG 12 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a. 4 CGA WG 7 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a

GENERAL TRIAL INFORMATION

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Roundup GPA Test

University of Georgia, CES Evaluation of Homeowner Preemergence Herbicide Formulations for Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass.

Smooth Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass with Pendulum Formulations

Smooth Crabgrass Control in 'KY 31' Tall Fescue with Pendulum Formulations

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Table 2. Evaluation of herbicide systems to control giant ragweed in soybeans at Rochester, MN in Pest Code AMBTR YIELD Pest Name Giant ragweed

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2016.

Date 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn

Southern Illinois University. Trial Location

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

9/12/2009 (C8 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia

9/14/2009 (C39 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia Twelve inch GR Palmer amaranth response to burndown herbicides.

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2015.

Southern Illinois University Marestail and Waterhemp Control in No-Till Enlist Soybeans with Burndown plus Residual.

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

(AG-02d-04) Site Description Page 1 North Carolina State University. Ignite/graminicide tank-mix interactions as affected by graminicide rates and AMS

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Command Extra/Gauntlet Test

in each of the trials conducted at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center (HTRC) in East

Southern Illinois University

Variety testing of Lolium perenne, Dactylis glomerata and Festuca arundinacea

Control of Little Barley in No-Till Wheat.

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application. Weed Density

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

(Forage2-06) Site Description Page 1 of 5 University of GA Coop Ext Service. Dogfennel Control in Pastures

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Roundup Formulation and Tank Mix Test #1

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Rescue Treatments in Roundup Ready Soybeans

Southern Illinois University

Comparison of weed control programs with herbicides containing bicyclopyrone and their standards in field corn in SE Minnesota in 2013

(FORAG9-02) AOV Means Table Page 1 of 4 University of Georgia, CES Tolerance of newly-sprigged forage bermudagrass to broadleaf herbicides.

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

Distribution Uniformity of Multi Stream Multi Trajectory Rotary Nozzles Spaced Below Recommended Distance

(01-ASC-15) Date June 27

Switchgrass plot following the 2011 harvest at Central Grasslands Research Extension Center, Streeter, ND.

General Trial Information Study Director: Bill Nutt Affiliation: UGA CAES

Glyphosate-Resistant Marestail, Waterhemp or Palmer Amaranth Control

MSU Weed Science Research Program

Miscellaneous, Including Horseradish and Wheat

Comments: Select Max (12 fl oz/a) + COC (1% v/v) was applied to the entire study to control grass weeds.

Performance Testing of Tall Fescue Turfgrasses at Oklahoma State University, Stillwater

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2010

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

Greenbush School Maintenance Calendar

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application. Weed Density

11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 University of Georgia. Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton.

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Valor PRE Test

Application Description. Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application

August 22, DAT Dandelion White Clover percent control. 26 b-e 57 bc. 7 de 65 bc. 19 cde 86 ab. 34 a-d 86 ab. 34 a-d 52 c.

To evaluate 120 commercial and experimental varieties of perennial ryegrass under low mowing height, high maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

Performance of Fine Fescue Cultivars and Selections ( )

Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY

PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

CONCLUSIONS No crop response was observed at any time for any of the treatments in this trial.

Southern Illinois University Bicyclopyrone: Tolerance and Efficacy in Horseradish - Site 2 - Low Weed Pressure.

(09 SRR-5 UPI KFD Soy BD) Site Description Page 1 of 21 Northeast Research & Extension Center

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Cooperative Research Project Dr. W. Douglas Gubler, U.C. Davis Dept. of Plant Pathology. Trial name... MBA Strawberry Fruit Rot Trial, 2006

EVALUATION OF REDUCED RISK INSECTICIDES FOR CODLING MOTH MANAGEMENT IN ENGLISH WALNUTS 2005

2009 Table Beet Weed Control Trials Methods: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2: Results: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2:

Bromacil, Diuron, and Flumioxazin Combinations for Total Vegetation Control

EVALUATION OF REFLEX AND BICYCLOPYRONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION

Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

MSU Weed Science Research Program Weed control and crop tolerance in Balance Beans - "Stewardship"

2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

(03 08 CRR-03 MAN Parallel Heavy South Pivot) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center

TREATMENT OF ONION BULBS WITH "SURROUND" TO REDUCE TEMPERATURE AND BULB SUNSCALD

Liquid Fertilizer Formulations Raw Materials

What s Creeping You Out Now

HARD APPLICATION BAREGROUND TREATMENTS COMPARING AE WP AND ROUNDUP PRO COMBINATIONS Trial ID: 09-T6 Protocol ID: 09-T6

Crop Stage at Each Application A B C Crop Name: ZEAMX ZEAMX ZEAMX Height (In.): 12-15(14) 21-27(24) Stage (L): V5-6(6)8L V8 11L

FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA

Variety testing of Poa pratensis, Festuca rubra, Lolium perenne and Dactylis glomerata

1/Jun/2005 (03-PPAC-CORN-BURC) Site Description Page 1 of 10 Purdue University Burcucumber control in corn

Trial Location. Objectives: Evaluate efficacy of Engenia in sequential programs compared to early postemergence plus residual programs.

Trial Report: Bell Pepper Variety Evaluation Spring 2017

Our objective was to determine which of the 134 cultivars of perennial ryegrass were best adapted to Indiana growing conditions.

factsheet Field Sprayer Calibration Introduction Pre-Calibration Checklist Using a Calibration Bottle

ARM U ... ARM U ADVANCED INTELLIGENT NITROGEN STABILIZERS TECHNOLOGY PAST THE POINT OF NUTRITION Distributed and supported by

1. Ignite 280 = glufosinate [BAYER] 2. OpTill = saflufenacil (Sharpen) + imazethapyr (Pursuit) [BASF]

Equipment Options for Small Pecan Orchards George Ray McEachern Professor of Horticulture TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY College Station, Texas 77843

Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Date 4/21 5/22 6/3 6/16 Treatment

Alternative Fuels Offer Pro

Weed control in ornamental bulbs (2000). Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU Mount Vernon.

Forage Harvester Evaluation

The Production of Perennial Forages. Paul E. Nyren

Transcription:

Georgia-Pacific s Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) and Blends of Nfusion (25-0-0) Steady- Delivery Nitrogen Soluble Fertilizer Compared to UMAXX (47-0-0) StabilizedNitrogen Fertilizer on a Perennial Ryegrass Lawn Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Matt Williams Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University January 6, 2009 A field study was conducted at the Washington State University Turfgrass and Agronomy Research Center (TARC) in Pullman, WA during the summer of 2008 to evaluate the effects of Nitamin 30L and Nfusion blended with Urea (46-0-0) or UAN (32-0- 0) and compared to UMAXX on perennial ryegrass (cv. Gallery ) mowed at 1.5. A randomized-complete block design was used with four replications and individual treatment plots were 6 x 10. Nitamin 30L was diluted 1:1 with water. Three soluble fertilizer blends were used: Nfusion (15%) + Urea (85%), Nfusion (40%) + Urea (60%), and Nfusion (40%) + UAN (60%). Soluble fertilizer treatments were applied 22 May 08 and 22 Jul 08 (9 weeks after initial treatment (WAIT)) with a bicycle-wheeled CO 2 pressurized (40 psi) sprayer using 11002 flat fan nozzles. Each plot was sprayed 2 times at approximately 25 gpa rate to achieve the desired nitrogen rate of 1.5 lbs N/M at each application date. UMAXX granular fertilizer was applied by hand at 1.5 lbs N/M at each application date. Each week, up to 18 WAIT, chlorophyll index readings were taken with a Field Scout CM1000 chlorophyll meter (Spectrum Technologies, Inc.). Clippings were collected once per week using a Toro rearbag mower, with mowing height set at 1.5. Clippings were dried in a forced-air drier at 45 o C for 72 hours then weighed. Visual turfgrass quality and color were rated on a scale of 1-9, with 9 equal to excellent quality or dark green color, respectively. Turfgrass quality rating of 6 is considered acceptable. After the first application of fertilizer at 1.5 lbs N/M on 22 May, there was little difference in chlorophyll readings between any of the Nitamin 30L or the 3 Nfusion blend treatments up to 8 WAIT (Table 1 and Figure 1). However, the UMAXX fertilizer treatment had the highest chlorophyll readings over this same time period. Following the second application of fertilizer on 22 July, UMAXX treated turf resulted in very high levels of chlorophyll from 10 to 13 WAIT compared to the other fertilizer treatments. Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85%) and Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) resulted in very similar chlorophyll readings and at levels that were higher than Nitamin 30L or Nfusion (40%) + Urea (60%) through 18 WAIT. By 15 WAIT there was no difference in chlorophyll content between Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85%), Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N), or UMAXX.

As with chlorophyll content, clipping dry weight for the UMAXX treatment was generally higher compared to the other treatments through 8 WAIT following the first fertilizer application (Table 2 and Figure 2). There was little difference between the Nitamin 30L or the 3 Nfusion blend treatments during this same time period. However, following the second fertilizer application on 22 July, there was a dramatic increase in the UMAXX clipping dry weight from 11 to 13 WAIT compared to the other fertilizer treatments. Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) generally had the lowest clipping dry weight (except for the check), up to 18 WAIT compared to the other fertilizer treatments. In general, UMAXX maintained the highest turfgrass quality and color ratings throughout the study (Tables 3 and 4 and Figures 3 and 4). Up to 5 WAIT, Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) and UMAXX had higher turfgrass quality and color compared to Nitamin 30L or the other 2 Nfusion blends. After the second application, Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) and Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) resulted in higher quality and color, for the most part, compared to Nitamin 30L or Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N). Along with the higher chlorophyll readings, turfgrass quality and color, UMAXX also had higher clipping dry weights than the other fertilizer treatments up to 15 WAIT. Following the first application, there was little difference in chlorophyll readings, clipping dry weight, turfgrass quality and color between Nitamin 30L or the 3 Nfusion blends. However, following the second application, Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) and Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) resulted in higher chlorophyll readings, turfgrass quality and color for most of the remaining 18 WAIT compared to Nitamin 30L or Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N). For the most part, clipping dry weight was similar among the Nitamin 30L and the Nfusion treatments except for Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) which tended to be lower.

Table 1. The effect of Nitamin 30L, three Nfusion fertilizer blends, and UMAXX on chlorophyll readings of a Gallery perennial ryegrass lawn. Chlorophyll Index* App. Rate 6/5/08 6/12/08 6/19/08 6/26/08 7/3/08 7/10/08 7/17/08 Fertilizer treatment dates (lbs N/M) 2 WAIT** 3 WAIT 4 WAIT 5 WAIT 6 WAIT 7 WAIT 8 WAIT Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 354.1 bc*** 376.6 bc 362.2 b 368.7 b 393.5 b 348.2 b 182.6 bc Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 371.4 b 387.9 b 372.3 b 365.0 b 395.3 b 345.8 b 195.3 ab Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 372.5 b 385.5 b 383.4 b 374.3 b 394.9 b 352.7 b 203.2 ab Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 325.1 c 349.7 c 350.1 b 361.2 b 408.3 b 349.7 b 186.2 bc UMAXX (47-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 407.7 a 471.0 a 471.4 a 420.6 a 463.6 a 413.0 a 225.9 a CHECK 0 272.6 d 277.5 d 259.2 c 288.4 c 285.5 c 278.2 c 156.7 c *Chlorophyll index 0-999; with 999 = high chlorophyll content. **WAIT (weeks after initial treatment) Chlorophyll Index* App. Rate 7/31/08 8/7/08 8/14/08 8/21/08 8/28/08 9/4/08 9/11/08 9/18/08 9/25/08 Fertilizer treatment dates (lbs N/M) 10 WAIT** 11 WAIT 12 WAIT 13 WAIT 14 WAIT 15 WAIT 16 WAIT 17 WAIT 18 WAIT Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 399.9 c*** 384.6 c 360.8 c 389.0 c 334.8 c 280.7 b 285.0 c 337.7 bc 322.0 bc Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 503.5 b 448.2 b 419.8 b 434.0 b 370.6 b 307.1 a 319.5 ab 358.7 ab 345.6 ab Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 400.8 c 390.5 c 355.8 c 398.3 c 337.6 c 276.8 b 295.4 bc 319.0 c 304.4 c Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 499.6 b 444.6 b 429.4 b 459.1 b 385.0 b 311.0 a 317.4 ab 372.5 a 363.5 a UMAXX (47-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 730.4 a 593.9 a 515.7 a 508.7 a 412.6 a 316.6 a 334.1 a 369.8 a 362.2 a CHECK 0 260.6 d 271.3 d 254.2 d 299.4 d 263.4 d 227.4 c 234.7 d 267.7 d 251.5 d *Chlorophyll index 0-999; with 999 = high chlorophyll content. **WAIT (weeks after initial treatment).

Figure 1. The effect of Nitamin 30L, three Nfusion fertilizer blends, and UMAXX on chlorophyll readings of a Gallery perennial ryegrass lawn. 800 700 2nd App 7/22/08 (9 WAT) Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend Chlorophyll Index (0-999) 600 500 400 300 UMAXX (47-0-0) CHECK 200 100 2 WAIT 3 WAIT 4 WAIT 5 WAIT 6 WAIT 7 WAIT 8 WAIT 10 WAIT 11 WAIT 12 WAIT 13 WAIT 14 WAIT 15 WAIT 16 WAIT 17 WAIT 18 WAIT

Table 2. The effect of Nitamin 30L, three Nfusion fertilizer blends, and UMAXX on clipping dry weight of a Gallery perennial ryegrass lawn. Clipping dry wt. (g/1 ft 2 ) App. Rate 5/30/08 6/5/08 6/12/08 6/19/08 6/26/08 7/3/08 7/10/08 7/17/08 Fertilizer treatment dates (lbs N/M) 1 WAIT* 2 WAIT 3 WAIT 4 WAIT 5 WAIT 6 WAIT 7 WAIT 8 WAIT Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 0.24 c** 0.29 b 0.50 b 0.50 b 0.23 ab 0.32 b 0.43 ab 0.29 ab Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 0.37 ab 0.39 ab 0.48 b 0.51 b 0.18 ab 0.31 b 0.31 b 0.25 bc Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 0.30 bc 0.34 ab 0.39 b 0.47 bc 0.30 ab 0.30 b 0.39 ab 0.20 bc Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 0.33 bc 0.34 ab 0.43 b 0.46 bc 0.34 a 0.33 b 0.48 ab 0.23 bc UMAXX (47-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 0.45 a 0.50 a 0.70 a 0.80 a 0.37 a 0.57 a 0.56 a 0.34 a CHECK 0 0.10 d 0.11 c 0.34 b 0.29 c 0.04 b 0.08 c 0.31 b 0.16 c *WAIT (weeks after initial treatment) **Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different. LSD P = 0.05. Clipping dry wt. (g/1 ft 2 ) App. Rate 7/31/08 8/7/08 8/14/08 8/21/08 8/28/08 9/4/08 9/11/08 9/18/08 9/25/08 Fertilizer treatment dates (lbs N/M) 10 WAIT* 11 WAIT 12 WAIT 13 WAIT 14 WAIT 15 WAIT 16 WAIT 17 WAIT 18 WAIT Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 0.42 bc** 0.48 bc 0.33 b 0.43 bc 0.33 b 0.27 bc 0.29 ab 0.37 ab 0.18 ab Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 0.53 ab 0.57 b 0.40 b 0.43 bc 0.35 ab 0.30 abc 0.31 ab 0.34 ab 0.22 a Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 0.25 cd 0.28 cd 0.29 b 0.32 c 0.30 b 0.20 cd 0.40 a 0.28 bc 0.10 bc Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 0.48 ab 0.61 b 0.37 b 0.50 b 0.41 ab 0.36 ab 0.33 ab 0.37 ab 0.21 a UMAXX (47-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 0.61 a 1.3 a 0.72 a 0.80 a 0.46 a 0.40 a 0.40 a 0.42 a 0.26 a CHECK 0 0.16 d 0.23 d 0.15 c 0.12 d 0.10 c 0.13 d 0.15 b 0.21 c 0.07 c *WAIT (weeks after initial treatment) **Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different. LSD P = 0.05.

Figure 2. The effect of Nitamin 30L, three Nfusion fertilizer blends, and UMAXX on clipping dry weight of a Gallery perennial ryegrass lawn. 1.5 1.0 Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend UMAXX (47-0-0) CHECK 2nd App. 7/22/08 Clip DW (g/1 ft2) 0.5 0.0 1 WAIT 2 WAIT 3 WAIT 4 WAIT 5 WAIT 6 WAIT 7 WAIT 8 WAIT 10 WAIT 11 WAIT 12 WAIT 13 WAIT 14 WAIT 15 WAIT 16 WAIT 17 WAIT 18 WAIT

Table 3. The effect of Nitamin 30L, three Nfusion fertilizer blends, and UMAXX on turfgrass quality of a Gallery perennial ryegrass lawn. Turfgrass quality* App. Rate 5/30/08 6/5/08 6/12/08 6/19/08 6/26/08 7/3/08 7/10/08 7/17/08 7/24/08 Fertilizer treatment dates (lbs N/M) 1 WAIT** 2 WAIT 3 WAIT 4 WAIT 5 WAIT 6 WAIT 7 WAIT 8 WAIT Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 5.3 c*** 6.5 ab 6.5 bc 6.8 b 7.0 ab 6.8 a 7.0 a 6.3 a 6.0 cd Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 6.0 ab 7.0 ab 7.3 ab 7.0 ab 7.0 ab 6.8 a 6.8 a 6.5 a 7.0 b Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 5.5 bc 6.3 b 6.3 c 7.0 ab 7.0 ab 7.0 a 6.8 a 6.3 a 5.8 d Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 5.3 c 6.3 b 6.5 bc 6.5 b 6.5 b 6.8 a 6.8 a 6.3 a 6.8 bc UMAXX (47-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 6.3 a 7.3 a 7.8 a 7.5 a 7.5 a 7.5 a 7.3 a 6.8 a 8.0 a CHECK 0 3.5 d 4.0 c 4.0 d 4.0 c 4.5 c 4.0 b 4.8 b 5.3 b 4.0 e *Turfgrass quality rated 1-9 with 9 = excellent. **WAIT (weeks after initial treatment) Turfgrass quality* App. Rate 7/31/08 8/7/08 8/14/08 8/21/08 8/28/08 9/4/08 9/11/08 9/18/08 9/25/08 Fertilizer treatment dates (lbs N/M) 10 WAIT** 11 WAIT 12 WAIT 13 WAIT 14 WAIT 15 WAIT 16 WAIT 17 WAIT 18 WAIT Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 5.8 c*** 6.3 bc 6.3 c 6.5 b 6.3 cd 6.0 b 6.3 ab 5.3 b 5.8 ab Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 6.5 bc 7.0 b 7.3 ab 7.0 b 7.0 bc 6.3 ab 6.5 ab 6.0 ab 6.3 a Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 5.8 c 5.8 c 6.0 c 5.5 c 6.0 b 6.3 ab 6.0 b 5.3 b 5.3 b Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 6.8 ab 6.8 b 6.8 bc 7.3 ab 7.3 ab 6.3 ab 6.3 ab 6.0 ab 6.3 a UMAXX (47-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 7.5 a 8.0 a 8.0 a 8.0 a 8.0 a 7.0 a 7.0 a 6.5 a 6.5 a CHECK 0 4.0 d 4.0 d 4.3 d 4.3 d 4.0 e 4.8 c 4.8 c 3.8 c 3.5 c *Turfgrass quality rated 1-9 with 9 = excellent. **WAIT (weeks after initial treatment)

Figure 3. The effect of Nitamin 30L, three Nfusion fertilizer blends, and UMAXX on turfgrass quality of a Gallery perennial ryegrass lawn. 9 8 2nd App. 7/22/08 Turfgrass quality (rated 1-9) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend UMAXX (47-0-0) CHECK 1 WAIT 2 WAIT 3 WAIT 4 WAIT 5 WAIT 6 WAIT 7 WAIT 8 WAIT 10 WAIT 11 WAIT 12 WAIT 13 WAIT 14 WAIT 15 WAIT 16 WAIT 17 WAIT 18 WAIT

Table 4. The effect of Nitamin 30L, three Nfusion fertilizer blends, and UMAXX on turfgrass color of a Gallery perennial ryegrass lawn. Pullman, WA 2008. Color* App. Rate 5/30/08 6/5/08 6/12/08 6/19/08 6/26/08 7/3/08 7/10/08 7/17/08 7/24/08 Fertilizer treatment dates (lbs N/M) 1 WAIT** 2 WAIT 3 WAIT 4 WAIT 5 WAIT 6 WAIT 7 WAIT 8 WAIT Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 5.3 c*** 6.5 bc 6.5 c 6.8 bc 7.0 bc 6.8 b 7.0 a 6.5 a 6.0 cd Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 6.0 b 7.3 ab 7.3 b 7.0 b 7.3 b 7.0 ab 7.0 a 6.5 a 7.0 b Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 5.5 bc 6.3 c 6.3 c 7.0 b 7.0 bc 7.0 ab 7.0 a 6. ab 5.8 d Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 5.0 c 6.5 bc 6.5 c 6.5 c 6.5 c 7.0 ab 7.0 a 6.8 a 6.8 bc UMAXX (47-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 6.8 a 7.5 a 8.0 a 8.0 a 8.0 a 8.0 a 7.3 a 7.3 a 8.0 a CHECK 0 3.5 d 4.0 d 4.0 d 4.0 d 4.3 d 3.8 c 5.0 b 5.3 b 4.0 e *Color rated 1-9 with 9 = dark green. **WAIT (weeks after initial treatment) Color* App. Rate 7/31/08 8/7/08 8/14/08 8/21/08 8/28/08 9/4/08 9/11/08 9/18/08 9/25/08 Fertilizer treatment dates (lbs N/M) 10 WAIT** 11 WAIT 12 WAIT 13 WAIT 14 WAIT 15 WAIT 16 WAIT 17 WAIT 18 WAIT Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 5.8 c*** 5.8 c 6.3 b 6.3 b 5.8 c 6.3 ab 6.0 bc 5.3 c 6.0 b Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 6.5 bc 7.0 b 7.0 b 6.8 ab 6.3 bc 6.3 ab 6.3 b 6.3 ab 7.0 a Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 5.8 c 6.0 c 6.3 b 6.0 b 5.8 c 5.8 b 5.5 c 5.3 c 6.0 b Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 6.8 b 6.8 b 6.8 b 6.8 ab 6.8 b 6.5 ab 6.0 bc 6.0 b 7.0 a UMAXX (47-0-0) 5/22 & 7/22 1.5 & 1.5 8.0 a 8.0 a 8.0 a 7.8 a 7.5 a 7.0 a 7.0 a 6.8 a 7.0 a CHECK 0 4.0 d 4.0 d 4.3 c 4.5 c 4.3 d 4.8 c 4.8 d 4.0 d 4.0 c *Color rated 1-9 with 9 = dark green. **WAIT (weeks after initial treatment)

Figure 4. The effect of Nitamin 30L, three Nfusion fertilizer blends, and UMAXX on turfgrass color of a Gallery perennial ryegrass lawn. 9 8 2nd App. 7/22/08 7 Color (rated 1-9) 6 5 4 3 2 Nitamin 30L (30-0-0) Nfusion (15% N) + Urea (85% N) blend Nfusion (40% N) + Urea (60% N) blend Nfusion (40% N) + UAN (60% N) blend UMAXX (47-0-0) CHECK 1 1 WAIT 2 WAIT 3 WAIT 4 WAIT 5 WAIT 6 WAIT 7 WAIT 8 WAIT 10 WAIT 11 WAIT 12 WAIT 13 WAIT 14 WAIT 15 WAIT 16 WAIT 17 WAIT 18 WAIT