Toolbox Transit Presentation Professors Joseph DiJohn and Siim Sööt University of Illinois at Chicago

Similar documents
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

BRT: What is it & Where Does it Fit? Sam Zimmerman

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

An Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics. Date April 30, 2009

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Project Scoping Open House Welcome

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Transit on the New NY Bridge

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Smart Green Transportation of LG CNS. Seoul Case

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

What s New in Shared. Mayor s Innovation Project Jan 24, 2015

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. March 2015

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

The Implications of Automated Vehicles for the Public Transit Industry

AMERICA. rides the BUS

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

SERVICE IMPROVEMENT GUIDE

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

KRM Corridor Transit Service Options: Frequently Asked Questions

Transportation Policy for Reducing GHG Emissions in Korea. Junhaeng Jo

May 23, 2011 APTA Bus & Paratransit Conference. Metro ExpressLanes

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

DEFINITIONS OF TRANSIT SYSTEMS TERMS

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation

Practical Strategies to Maximizing Parking

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

Van Ness Transit Corridor Improvement Project. Engineering, Maintenance and Safety Committee March 25, 2015

Central Loop Bus Rapid Transit

HOW TO DELIVER PUBLIC TRANSPORT ON REDUCED BUDGET

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

Congestion Charging - An Idea Whose Time Has Come?

Shuttle Bug: Linking Workers to Public Transportation in Northern Cook and Southern Lake Counties University of Illinois- Chicago Urban

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Milwaukee County Transit System

Application of Autonomous Driving Technology to Transit

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

Where will. BRT run? BRT will serve 20 stations along the line, connecting to bus routes and serving major destinations. How often will service run?

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ROLES

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study

Review of the Wake County Transit Plan

What IS BRT, Really? Not BRT and RNY

Transit Fares for Multi-modal Transportation Systems

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

Parking Management Strategies

Click to edit Master title style

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

The Denver Model. Miller Hudson

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese - General Manager

Commuter Vanpool Program Scope of Work

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

Chapter 3. Service Analysis and Future Service Concepts

Energy efficiency policies for transport. John Dulac International Energy Agency Paris, 29 May 2013

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

Policy Template on Best Practices for Energy Efficient Urban Passenger Transportation

Bus Rapid Transit: Basic Design for Non-Transit Planners

Modal Choice for Mass Rapid Transit

LADOT Enhancing Transit Services through Competitive Bidding

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Shared-Use Mobility: First & Last Mile Solution. Sarah Nemecek Project Manager

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Initial Screening Analysis

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CAPACITIES AND COSTS

Shared Mobility and Transit It is The Road to Economic

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. March 2017

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Smart Solutions for. Shared Mobility

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

12/5/2018 DRAFT. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Smoothing Traffic for Urban Environment

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese CEO/General Manager

Brainstormed Solutions - Passenger

CTA Blue Line Study Area

TRAIN, BUS & TRANSIT

Public Transit Existing Conditions

Customer Service, Operations and Safety Committee Tariff Modifications July 21, 2005

FACT SHEET. US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies. Alternative Description/Overview

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Efficient Transportation Six Case Stories

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

[Kanalli, 3(3): March, 2014] ISSN: Impact Factor: 1.852

What is the Connector?

Tough Choices: The Whens, Whats and Hows of Mega Projects

Transcription:

Toolbox Transit Presentation Professors Joseph DiJohn and Siim Sööt University of Illinois at Chicago

Brief History of the RTA Early years Private operators CTA formed in 1946 1974 Referendum to create RTA Provided operating subsidies 1981 financial crisis impacts

Brief History of the RTA 1983 Reorganization of the RTA New local funding sales tax Create service boards - CTA, Metra & Pace 2007 Funding Legislation Increased sales tax ¼% Oversight Innovation

Mode Characteristics Passenger capacity Average speed Frequency of intervals Station or stop spacing Efficiency Trip length Fare type (base or zone)

Commuter Rail or Regional Rail (Example: Metra) Zone fares Highest speed Less frequent intervals Longer distance between stations High capacity single or double deck Most efficient, highest farebox recovery Longest distances, home to work, usually CBD

Heavy Rail (Examples: CTA elevated and subway) Usually in congested, high-density areas Moderate distance between stations Exclusive right-of-way Longer distances trips Platform boarding Higher speeds Frequent intervals

Light Rail (LRT: SDiego, SJose, PDX) Medium capacity in single or multiple cars Extensive use of exclusive right-of-way Medium- to short- distance trips Street level or platform boarding Overhead power source Frequent intervals Base fare system Seattle Phoenix

Street car - Portland Local circulator Operate as feeder Fare collection In city traffic Capacity hi/lo

Classic Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Bogota Platform loading Fares paid in station Exclusive right-of-way, or Signal Priority when in traffic Multiple doors (rapid loading safe operation) High capacity, articulated buses

MultiModal Systems Light rail heavy rail Encounters vehicular traffic in the city Heavy rail in the suburbs One-seat ride Long distance Feeder/main line Camden River Line

MultiModal Systems Light rail street car Operates on street in the CBD Exclusive right of way elsewhere with cross traffic

MultiModal Systems Heavy Rail Commuter Rail Subway in CBD Suburbs: station spacing Long distance trips Distance-based fares

Los Angeles Heavy Light

Express Bus (Pace 855, CTA X rtes.) Operate in traffic Street boarding Higher speed than local bus Frequent intervals Less frequent stops Medium to low capacity Signal Priority can increase speeds Base fare or express premium Operate on expressways, HOV lanes or bus on shoulders

Transfer/Feeder Operatio Feeders to high-capacity stations Serves local demand time and place Easy transfer: 1) protected environment 2) no transfer fee Toronto

Fixed-route Bus (Ex: CTA and Pace ) Low capacity Operate in traffic Frequent stops Lowest average speed Frequency varies with density and demand Base fare paid or scanned on vehicle Low farebox recovery

Paratransit (Ex: Pace Dial-A-Ride) Low density and suburban areas Smaller mini-buses or vans ADA special services required by law Curb-to-curb service, usually for elderly and disabled ADA same days and hours of fixed-route buses Local municipal or township dial-a-rides Limited hours and service area 24-hour notice call in period Lowest farebox recovery (10%) Hybrid: route deviation in lower-density areas

Ride Sharing (Ex: Pace VIP Vanpool and Regional Ride Sharing) Car pool-computer matching program Van pool- developed with Employers o Volunteer driver o Energy efficient o Zone fares based on distance and number of riders in pool o Route designed by members o One trip in AM, one in PM o High farebox recovery Car-sharing programs

Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Transportation Management Associations TMAs Commuter pre-tax benefits Emergency ride home Telecommuting Flexible work hours Compressed workweek Parking management, cash-out, HOV priority Transit promotion and subsidies Non-motorized modes, pedestrian and bicycle