Dr. K. Gunasekaran Associate Professor Division of Transportation Engineering Anna University Chennai

Similar documents
The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Page 1 TRANSFORMING CITY BUS SERVICE - NOIDA

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

Central London Congestion Charging Scheme. 17 March 2005 Impacts - 9 th Annual Conference. Michele Dix Director Congestion Charging Division

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

The Bus Rapid Transit System of Lagos, Nigeria

Shared Transport experience from the UK

2019 New Transit Service Plan

TransMilennio Bogota Colombia 84 7m 45,000 1,300,000

2015 LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT

Sound Transit Operations July 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Economy. 38% of GDP in 1970; 33% of GDP in 1998 Most significant decline in Manufacturing 47% to 29%

Mysuru PBS Presentation on Prepared by: Directorate of Urban Land Transport

2015 LRT PASSENGER COUNT. CAPITAL and METRO LINES

February 2012 Caltrain Annual Passenger Counts Key Findings

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Intermodal Regional Planning INTERCITY BUS PILOT PROGRAM. October 1, 2010 Presentation Bob Kuhns, Clark Nexsen (Washington, DC)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

History of Subway in Kyoto

2010 Motorcycle Risk Study Update

Click to edit Master title style

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

SA TAXI IMPACT DELIVERING A SOCIAL & COMMERCIAL BENEFIT R18.6 BILLION LOANS ORIGINATED CREATING R2.9 BILLION LOANS ORIGINATED CREATING

ACCESS MODE CHOICE MODEL FOR INTERCITY PASSENGER TRAVEL. Prof. CSRK Prasad Head, Transportation Division NIT Warangal

EXPERIENCE IN A COMPANY-WIDE LONG DISTANCE CARPOOL PROGRAM IN SOUTH KOREA

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area

Suggestions toward quality improvement in public transportation service in Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil

Whither the Dashing Commuter?

First of four service increases delivered in April 2015

Expansion Projects Description

building liveable cities

Vacaville Transit Service Evaluation Study Working Paper Two Route and Network Evaluation

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. March 2017

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Table of Contents. Attachment 1 Caltrain Service History Attachment 2 Tables and Graphs Caltrain Annual Passenger Counts 1 of 12 Final

Executive Summary October 2013

Husky Stadium: TMP Modernization Project

Viable City bus in Small Cities

Draft Results and Recommendations

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito

One City, One System: Integrating Public Urban Transportation in Coimbra

Tarrant County Projected Population Growth

Service and Operations Planning for Ottawa s New Light Rail Line Pat Scrimgeour

Car passengers on the UK s roads: An analysis. Imogen Martineau, BA (Hons), MSc

BUS SERVICES IN CHAMBERLAYNE ROAD NW10

[Kanalli, 3(3): March, 2014] ISSN: Impact Factor: 1.852

2. Big Data Big Data in Seoul s Transportation Policy: Designing Late Night Bus Routes Based on Big 2. 빅데이터 빅데이터를활용한서울시교통계획 : 빅데이터를이용한심야버스노선설계

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. April 2018

Preferred citation style

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. July 2018

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

MOBILITY CHALLENGES IN EU LOW DENSITY AREAS, TRENDS AND SOLUTIONS Presentation of a case study in the Swiss Jura

Transit Fares for Multi-modal Transportation Systems

The main figures of public transport in Catalonia

The impact of electric vehicle development on peak demand and the load curve under different scenarios of EV integration and recharging options

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Paid Parking Pilot Program Parking Management

Draft Results and Open House

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Leakage of Transit Ridership in BCLL Bus Service over Private Bus Service Provider in Bhopal

Preferred citation style

Milano, from pollution charge to congestion charge

Comparison of bus services in Indian cities

Urban Land Use/Transport Policy, Metro and Its Impacts in Shanghai

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

The Motorcycle Industry in Europe. Powered Two-Wheelers the SMART Choice for Urban Mobility

Level of Service Analysis for Urban Public Transportation of Dumlupinar University Evliya Celebi Campus in Kutahya, Turkey

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Efficient & Sustainable City Bus Systems

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

M E M O / N O T E D E S E R V I C E

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Valuing Convenience in Public Transport in the Korean Context

Meter Insights for Downtown Store

Appendix B CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation

Initiatives on BMTC. BMTC - Bringing Bangalore to your Door Steps. By MUKKANNA.B Chief Mechanical Engineer BMTC, Bangalore 18/12/2015

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

Smart Green Transportation of LG CNS. Seoul Case

Role of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles

February 2011 Caltrain Annual Passenger Counts Key Findings

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

World Bank Support to Urban Transport in India

Sofia Urban Transport challenges and strategies

The Strategies and Revelation of Free Buses in Chengdu

The impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban mobility

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Image from:

Transcription:

Dr. K. Gunasekaran Associate Professor Division of Transportation Engineering Anna University Chennai

INTRODUCTION Bus Transport is the most preferred Public Transport System in many Indian cities Recent times the passenger patronage for bus transport is declining due to o increased travel time o low reliability o low frequency of services in urban fringe areas o Higher dependency on private modes of Travel

Public Transport Scenario in Major Indian Cities In Chennai Bus transport modal share has declined from 42% in 1970 to 26% share in 2008. Challenging task to pull back the commuters who have switched to private modes opting comfortable, convenient and faster travel

EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SCENARIO IN CHENNAI Description Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) Area in sq.kms Population in 2001 1189 7 million Chennai City 176 4 million Total daily person trips in Millions 9.153 (in 2001) 20.760 (in 2026) Total number of motor vehicles in Chennai city has increased from 0.569 million in 1991 to 3.2 million in 2010 Average growth rate of vehicle population per annum is about 9.7% 3151 buses are operated by Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTC) in 681 routes in Chennai 5.7 millions trips per day are performed in MTC buses

BUS OPERATIONS IN CHENNAI MTC is the monopoly bus operator in Chennai Metropolitan area Initial fleet strength of 1029 buses in 1972 the fleet has increased to 3421 buses in 2010 80% of bus commuters belong to Low Income Group (LIG) (Study 2001) Operates 22% of fleet as ordinary buses with low fare and the balance as special services and AC Services at 1.25 to 5 times the fare of ordinary busses. Average passenger occupancy varied between 57% to 90% during the last four decades. The average occupancy around 86% and 125-150% occupancy during the peak hours. The average kilometer operated in a day increased from 223 km/bus in 1972 to 316 kilometers/bus in 2010.

10 Air conditioned buses operated end of 2007 in Chennai Fleet was increased with MOUD financial support through JNNURM Scheme to 100 buses in the end of 2009 AC buses were introduced to facilitate comfortable travel at cost higher than ordinary buses. Fare of AC buses was relatively lower than travel cost of two wheeler & Car trips. Higher fare initially had less takers and ridership gradually increased.

The study was devised to analyze the seasonal variations on ridership to understand the influence of climatic variations on average occupancy level per bus To analyze the trend/impact of increase in fleet strength on ridership. It was planned to interview 1% of the commuters on a typical working day to understand the travel characteristics of the passengers. The passengers were interviewed during the travel to understand their personal characteristics & travel preferences Ridership level in AC buses needs to be analyzed to plan the operations

Trend of Monthly Trips by AC Buses (2008 2010) 10 AC buses introduced in September 2007, increased to 30 in October 2008 and to 100 March 2010 with the addition of buses procured with MOUD financial support. In 2008 nearly 120,000 passengers were carried per month, increased to 1.4 million passengers per month in 2010 The ridership has grown 11.5 times in the last two and half years

Daily Variation of Passengers carried (Sep 2010) Maximum ridership was realised on Monday work trips from Monday to Friday and the recreational/social trips on Sundays in equal numbers

Hourwise Passenger Loading in AC Buses 32.5% of ridership during the morning peak period (7-11 AM) and 29.5% during the evening peak period (4-8 PM). 13.5% of daily ridership was observed from 8AM to 9 AM in a day, higher than peak hour ridership (9.2%) of all MTC buses.

Average Daily Occupancy Level in AC Buses In spite of nearly twelve fold increase in fleet strength the average occupancy level increased from 26% to 33% in the last three years. Occupancy level is low - November to February due to pleasant weather in Chennai & in hot summer period (April to July) the occupancy level is highest. The low ridership is a cause of concern and MTC can collect reduced fare to encourage ridership during the lean hours and periods.

Travel Characteristics of Commuters Nearly 40,000 passengers travel by AC buses in a day Based on the survey 37% of the commuters in AC buses were regular travelers 55% of the passengers were aged between to 20-40 years 33% between 40-60 years 61% of the commuters interviewed were employed 47% of the commuters mainly for work trips 10% of trips were for education purpose Balance were for shopping, social and recreational activities It was observed that 74% of the travelers owned vehicle but opted for travel by AC buses

Earlier Mode of Travel Autorickshaw 9% Ordinary Bus 26% Two Wheeler 15% Car/Van 9% Deluxe Bus 41% The AC buses are successful in attracting 24% private vehicle users. Higher level of Comfort in AC Buses was prime reason for choosing it.

Punctuality Deviations of AC buses measured from Vehicle Tracking Facility o + punctuality deviation means that a vehicle is late o - value indicates that a vehicle is early o indicate the earliest and latest vehicle observed o shows the mean punctuality deviation o indicate the 15% and 85% values

Passenger Counts using Electronic Ticketing Machine Data

Time Space Plot to Monitor Operations Dashed line indicates scheduled trip s trajectory Solid line indicates the observed trip s trajectory

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION Nearly 5.7 million trips in Chennai are performed by buses Upgraded fleet of 100 Air Conditioned buses carry 40,000 passenger per day Cost of AC bus travel is relatively higher than other category of buses Successfully attracted the private vehicle riders to bus travel as AC Buses offer comfortable travel at reasonable cost. Public transport system offering a comfortable similar to AC buses is required. As considerable segment have opted to travel by AC Buses due to the less travel time use of ITS facilities need to be used for monitoring and maintaining the reliability of services.

Thank You