Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

AUGUST 2015 URBAN MOBILITY. Scorecard

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Needs and Community Characteristics

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

BROCHURE AND APPLICATION FORM

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 865 850 840 825 810 Rank 52 52 52 52 52 Commuters (1000s) 426 426 414 406 397 Freeway 3,826 3,784 3,755 3,793 3,761 Arterial Streets 11,760 11,308 10,680 10,832 10,741 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.23 3.47 3.34 3.19 2.70 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.55 3.77 3.94 3.68 2.99 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 28 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 26 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 2.40 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 17,477 16,594 16,438 16,074 16,034 Rank 44 44 44 44 44 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 23 22 22 21 21 Rank 18 21 18 22 21 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 35,993 34,176 33,854 33,104 33,022 Rank 44 44 44 44 44 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 47 45 46 46 47 Rank 23 25 23 21 17 Travel Time Index 1.22 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.22 Rank 32 33 32 32 29 Commuter Stress Index 1.24 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23 Rank 40 42 40 40 40 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 2.11 -- -- -- -- Rank 53 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 856 826 830 829 853 Rank 44 45 44 45 44 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,128 1,089 1,094 1,092 1,124 Rank 23 26 25 25 25

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 790 775 760 740 720 Rank 52 52 52 53 54 Commuters (1000s) 386 377 368 356 344 Freeway 3,632 3,550 3,510 3,650 3,540 Arterial Streets 11,100 11,260 11,205 11,235 11,100 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.32 3.36 3.03 2.63 2.42 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.59 4.09 3.55 2.97 2.69 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 15,411 16,733 15,654 14,725 13,845 Rank 43 43 43 44 45 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 20 22 21 19 18 Rank 24 15 20 33 39 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 31,739 34,461 32,240 30,327 28,513 Rank 44 44 43 45 46 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 46 51 49 47 46 Rank 20 17 22 25 26 Travel Time Index 1.21 1.24 1.23 1.22 1.21 Rank 32 27 30 34 35 Commuter Stress Index 1.23 1.26 1.25 1.24 1.23 Rank 39 38 39 41 41 Total Cost ($ millions) 833 901 876 846 822 Rank 44 42 44 44 45 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,098 1,188 1,154 1,115 1,083 Rank 25 17 25 30 34

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 700 685 665 655 645 Rank 55 56 56 59 59 Commuters (1000s) 333 324 311 302 293 Freeway 3,425 3,285 3,000 2,750 2,420 Arterial Streets 10,320 10,105 9,620 9,610 9,355 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.04 1.59 1.47 1.62 1.52 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.12 1.61 1.46 1.66 1.57 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 12,663 12,264 11,679 11,331 11,061 Rank 47 47 47 46 45 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 17 16 15 15 15 Rank 43 44 49 40 33 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 26,078 25,257 24,052 23,336 22,781 Rank 47 48 48 46 46 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 43 43 43 42 42 Rank 28 28 28 28 24 Travel Time Index 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 Rank 35 35 35 32 28 Commuter Stress Index 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.21 1.21 Rank 43 43 42 44 40 Total Cost ($ millions) 777 773 753 742 745 Rank 47 46 46 46 46 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,024 1,019 992 978 982 Rank 46 43 42 40 37

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 640 635 625 625 620 Rank 58 58 58 57 56 Commuters (1000s) 288 282 274 271 265 Freeway 2,100 1,955 1,775 1,670 1,475 Arterial Streets 9,265 9,135 8,985 8,250 8,000 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.38 1.19 1.32 1.26 1.20 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.39 1.31 1.34 1.29 1.22 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 10,454 9,789 9,221 8,642 8,233 Rank 45 44 43 43 41 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 14 13 12 11 11 Rank 34 34 38 41 35 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 21,529 20,160 18,991 17,799 16,956 Rank 46 44 44 44 43 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 41 39 37 35 34 Rank 23 23 22 26 26 Travel Time Index 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.16 1.16 Rank 30 29 32 36 32 Commuter Stress Index 1.21 1.20 1.19 1.18 1.17 Rank 39 40 42 46 46 Total Cost ($ millions) 728 696 666 639 626 Rank 45 44 44 43 42 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 959 918 878 842 826 Rank 38 38 36 38 38

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 605 590 560 550 530 Rank 56 56 59 59 59 Commuters (1000s) 256 246 231 224 213 Freeway 1,365 1,330 1,280 1,250 1,275 Arterial Streets 7,725 7,675 7,500 7,320 7,190 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.19 1.18 1.22 1.06 1.07 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.21 1.20 1.26 1.20 1.18 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 7,582 7,219 6,796 6,362 5,823 Rank 42 41 42 41 44 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 10 10 9 8 8 Rank 37 24 28 31 25 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 15,615 14,867 13,997 13,103 11,992 Rank 43 43 42 42 41 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 32 32 32 31 29 Rank 28 22 18 18 21 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.14 1.14 Rank 35 30 26 28 25 Commuter Stress Index 1.17 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.15 Rank 44 44 44 41 42 Total Cost ($ millions) 593 579 562 542 517 Rank 42 42 42 41 40 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 782 763 740 714 681 Rank 37 35 32 32 33

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 510 500 490 480 470 Rank 61 61 61 61 61 Commuters (1000s) 203 198 192 187 182 Freeway 1,200 1,070 1,130 1,040 970 Arterial Streets 7,110 7,050 6,980 6,940 6,910 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.11 1.02 1.03 1.00 1.31 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.20 1.10 1.11 1.08 1.42 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 5,243 4,888 4,363 4,128 3,658 Rank 43 41 40 41 41 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 7 6 6 5 5 Rank 29 31 27 33 29 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 10,797 10,066 8,985 8,501 7,534 Rank 42 41 40 40 41 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 28 26 24 23 21 Rank 19 20 20 21 22 Travel Time Index 1.13 1.12 1.11 1.11 1.10 Rank 27 27 29 26 26 Commuter Stress Index 1.14 1.14 1.13 1.12 1.11 Rank 42 40 40 40 42 Total Cost ($ millions) 490 479 445 437 394 Rank 40 40 41 39 40 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 646 631 587 576 520 Rank 35 31 35 34 34

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 455 450 450 Rank 61 61 60 Commuters (1000s) 174 171 169 Freeway 950 810 750 Arterial Streets 6,885 6,800 6,750 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.33 1.36 1.42 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.43 1.46 1.53 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 3,275 3,038 2,946 Rank 40 40 40 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 4 4 4 Rank 34 29 28 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 6,745 6,257 6,068 Rank 42 39 40 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 20 19 18 Rank 24 22 21 Travel Time Index 1.09 1.09 1.08 Rank 29 27 28 Commuter Stress Index 1.11 1.10 1.10 Rank 39 42 37 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 366 354 354 Rank 41 40 38 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 482 466 467 Rank 38 37 33