LSFO (0.10%) Chris Fisher Mobile: Brookes Bell Group

Similar documents
ULSFO (0.10) and RM (VLSFO) Category Potential future trends

Index 1. ISO 8217 :

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF LOW SULPHUR FUEL OILS IN SHIPS

Changing Scene of Marine Fuel Quality

Bunker Claims. How an Engine Works. How an Engine Works. Alex Macinnes Sept 2018

all engines Diesel engine fuels Issue

Bunkering With New Fuels Building on Strong Foundations.

Meeting ECA requirements a new challenge & a new opportunity

Our reputation is the wheel of our success.

Marine Fuels & Environment

On-Line Process Analyzers: Potential Uses and Applications

New Regulatory Environment

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Oct Applicability: All Brightoil clients ISO 8217:2010 VS ISO 8217:2010 Major Changes

ISO 8217:2010 Dr.r.Vis, Viswa Lab

Neste. Cimac Cascades 2017 Helsinki. Teemu Sarjovaara, D.Sc.(Tech) Neste R&D, Products

Bunker Fuel Quality: 2020 Outlook North of England P&I Athens, November

The Nautical Institute

Fuel Related Definitions

Supply of Services for Detailed OEB Crude Assay Analysis

Marine Fuel Management. Mark Pearson ASGL Marine Fuel Manager Athens, 9 April 2014

ISO Petroleum products Fuels (class F) Specifications of marine fuels

REBCO (RUSSIAN EXPORT BLEND CRUDE OIL) SPECIFICATION GOST

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE

Fuel handling. in Emission Controlled Areas

CIMAC Position Paper

Changes in Bunker Fuel Quality Impact on European and Russian Refiners

FUEL QUALITY TESTING YOUR FUEL MANAGEMENT PARTNER

The road leading to the 0.50% sulphur limit and IMO s role moving forward

ISO 8217 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Petroleum products Fuels (class F) Specifications of marine fuels

Bunker Summit Greece. Monique Vermeire Athens. 10 May, 2007

Tanker Operator Hamburg Conference Cases of increased wear due to Cat Fines avoidable by on-board fuel condition

Emissions regulation compliance and low sulphur fuels

GUIDANCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SHIP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE CONSISTENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 0.50% SULPHUR LIMIT UNDER MARPOL ANNEX VI

Desulphurizing Bunker Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology

Marine Fuel Solutions. 5 th European Bunker Fuels Conference Rotterdam May 2014 Chris Turner Group Technical Manager

Desulphurizing Marine Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology. November 19, 2017 International Ultrasonic Technologies Inc.

Recommendation for petroleum fuel treatment systems for marine diesel engines

FUEL LUBE OIL. and. By Charlotte Røjgaard MAN Diesel. MAN Diesel / Charlotte Røjgaard MAN Diesel A/S 1

Refining impact of the IMO bunker fuel sulphur decision

Low sulphur bunker fuel oil : what are the options?

Sampling & Test Accuracy under the umbrella of emissions legislation

10K98MC-C and 6S35MC on the same Testbed

ISO 8217 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Petroleum products Fuels (class F) Specifications of marine fuels

THE IMPACT OF REGULATIONS ON MARINE FUEL QUALITY

Oil & Gas. From exploration to distribution. Week 3 V19 Refining Processes (Part 1) Jean-Luc Monsavoir. W3V19 - Refining Processes1 p.

COMMON SENSE ABOUT 2020

Middle East DownStream Weak May 2013 ABU DHABI, UAE

System Engineering Concept Guidance

ANNEX 2, REFERENCE FUELS

Container MBW12K90MC Thursday 25 Jan 2007

Conversion Processes 1. THERMAL PROCESSES 2. CATALYTIC PROCESSES

Bunkers. KIVI 30 oct 2012 Anton Spierings (VNPI)

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Specifications Of Straight Run Naphtha for Exportation

products 22 º C Ventilation Air Conditioning Refrigeration MGO Cooler - The reliable solution towards lower sulphur emissions Inside

SHIP OPERATIONS COOPERATIVE PROGRAM

Fundamentals of Petroleum Refining Refinery Products. Lecturers: assistant teachers Kirgina Maria Vladimirovna Belinskaya Natalia Sergeevna

Commercial Marine Presentation

INTERTANKO Documentary Committee Bunker 2020

TechnipFMC RFCC Technology converts bunker fuels into high value products for African refiners

BC control options reduction technologies

ANNEX 3 REFERENCE FUELS. Parameter Unit Limits (1) Test method Minimum Maximum Research octane number, RON

Assessment of Fuel Oil Availability. Jasper Faber, The Hague, 3 October 2016

White paper. MARPOL Annex VI fuel strategies and their influence on combustion in boilers

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.119/Amend.1 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.119/Amend.1

Co-Processing of Green Crude in Existing Petroleum Refineries. Algae Biomass Summit 1 October

Fuel cat fines - problems and mitigation

Products Methodology. September 2013

Technology Development within Alternative Fuels. Yves Scharff

Bottom of Barrel Processing. Chapters 5 & 8

A multi-fuel future: the impact of the IMO sulphur cap

LNG. DME Ethane. Coal Slurry MSAR. Biofuel ULSFO (Ultra Low Sulphur Fuel Oil) Methanol Glycerine Hydrogen

Coking and Thermal Process, Delayed Coking

New Residue Up-grading Complex at European Refinery Achieves Euro 5 Specifications

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL STANDARD

Workshop on GHG Emission On Ships Co-organised by CIL and MPA

Bunker Fuel Quality Management Today & Tomorrow

Petroleum Refining Fourth Year Dr.Aysar T. Jarullah

Fuel oils Specification

26th September 2018 IRPC - Houston

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

EURONAV TALKS IMO 2020 FROM THE VIEW OF A SHIPOWNER JUNE

UPGRADE PROJECT SAMIR- MOROCCO BY MADHOUNI BOUCHAIB HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABORATORIES ARA, 2-3 JULY 2009, ACCRA, GHANA

Bunker Fuel Quality. Ian Workman Account Manager VPS Testing & Inspection Inc

ISBN SANS 342:2006 Edition 4 SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL STANDARD Automotive diesel fuel Published by Standards South Africa 1 dr lategan roa

International Quality Assurance Exchange Program Schedule. Fuel Month Number Type Dispatch Date Closing Date

Fischer-Tropsch Refining

ANNEX 18. RESOLUTION MSC.150(77) (adopted on 2 June 2003)

UOP/EMRE Alliance for High Quality Lube and Diesel Production Technology

Removing High Sulphur Bunker from the Refineries: Eni s case study

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs)

Low sulphur marine fuel options: Technical, environmental & economic aspects

ABS Notes. Use of Low Sulphur Marine Fuel for Boilers

DEVELOPMENT OF DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR CONSISTENT IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION OF MARPOL ANNEX VI

OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS IN SLOW SPEED DIESEL ENGINES CAUSED BY USE OF POOR QUALITY FUELS WITH HIGH CAT-FINES CONTENT

FUELS. Product Specifications

Low carbon content Carbon content lower than 0.01%wt. Low nitrogen content Very low content of nitrogen compounds (traces)

Examining the cost burden imposed on European refining by EU legislation

What to Expect from Your New Low (and Ultra-Low) Sulfur Fuels

MARINE FUEL OIL ADVISORY ABS MARINE FUEL OIL ADVISORY 2018 i. Alex Kolokythas/Shutterstock

Transcription:

LSFO (0.10%) Chris Fisher Mobile: 07717872095 Email: chris.fisher@brookesbell.com Brookes Bell Group Marine scientific and technical consultants and surveyors Providing comprehensive services in the marine and energy world 1

Scope of Presentation Conventional and Alternative refinery streams for Marine fuel Fuel Specifications Availability and quality issues - gas oil Availability Alternative LSFO Quality and specification issues alternative fuels Storage, handling and consumption Commercial issues Price, Energy, Specifications Conclusions Excellence Integrity Proficiency 2

Crude Oil Atmospheric Distillation Gas (internal fuel and LPG) Naphtha (for gasoline) Kerosene (for Jet fuel) Crude oil feed Gas oil (for diesel) Atmospheric residue 3

Vacuum Distillation Reduced pressure Light Vacuum Gas Oil / Waxy Gas Oil Medium Vacuum Gas Oil Crude oil feed Heavy Vacuum Gas Oil Atmospheric residue Vacuum residue 4

Catalytic Cracking Excellence Integrity Proficiency 5

Hydrocracker Hydro crackers are not new units on the refinery Frequently used to upgrade difficult distillate streams from: Vacuum units high wax/viscosity Cokers very unstable and generally poor quality fuels Visbreakers/Thermal gas oil units unstable Catcrackers cycle oils unstable and very aromatic. The bottom stream from the distillation unit is either recycled or moved on as a feedstock for other processes. It can also be used as a very low sulphur fuel in its own right or as a LS fuel blend component 6

Hydro Cracker Bottoms Very low Sulphur Very low metals Quite waxy High pour point High viscosity relative to normal distillates Very high flash point Excellent ignition/combustion properties Cheaper than gas oil! Excellence Integrity Proficiency 7

ISO 8217 - Specification of Marine Fuels Distillate Fuel (marine gas oil) Residual Fuel (fuel oil) 8

Traditional Blend components Distillate fuel Gas oil (atmospheric distillation) Waxy gas oil (vacuum distillation) Light cycle oil (cracking) Residual fuel Vacuum Residue (vacuum distillation) Light and Heavy Cycle oils (cracking) Main Column Bottoms (cracking) 9

MARINE DISTILLATE FUELS ISO 8217:2010 Parameter Unit Limit DMX DMA DMZ DMB Viscosity at 40 C mm ² /s Max 5.500 6.000 6.000 11.00 Viscosity at 40 C mm ² /s Min 1.400 2.000 3.000 2.000 Micro Carbon Residue at 10% Residue % m/m Max 0.30 0.30 0.30 - Density at 15 C kg/m 3 Max - 890.0 890.0 900.0 Micro Carbon Residue % m/m Max - - - 0.30 Sulphur a % m/m Max 1.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 Water % V/V Max - - - 0.30 b Total sediment by hot filtration % m/m Max - - - 0.10 b Ash % m/m Max 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 Flash point 0 C Min 43.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 Pour point, Summer 0 C Max 0 0 0 6 Pour point, Winter C Max -6-6 -6 0 Cloud point C Max -16 - - - Calculated Cetane Index Min 45 40 40 35 Acid Number mgkoh/g Max 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Oxidation stability g/m 3 Max 25 25 25 25 c Lubricity, corrected wear scar diameter (wsd 1.4 at 60 C d um Max 520 520 520 520 c Hydrogen sulphide e mg/kg Max 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Appearance Clear & Bright f b, c 10

RESIDUAL FUELS ISO 8217:2010 11

ECA Fuels What are they & why do we have them? MARPOL annex VI regulations, Jan 1 st 2015 0.1 %m/m max sulphur content Does not have to be Gas Oil 12

Gas Oil Quality Issues Sulphur content often just above the limit of 0.10% but usually within repeatability Flash point occasionally just below 60C Risk of microbial infection developing on board if water is present. Maybe stored for long periods Low viscosity and hence careful temperature control needed during switching Paraffinic risk of instability with HSFO 13

Alternative ECA Fuels ExxonMobil Premium Heavy Distillate (HDME 50) Premium Advanced Fuel Marine ECA 2000 (AFME 200) Shell ULSFO (ultra low sulphur fuel oil) BP RMD (residual fuel 80 cst max) Lukoil Eco Marine SK Energy ULSFO Chemoil 0.10 % S Fuel oil DMB (distillate) Many different names that will cause confusion 14

Availability 0.10% Gas Oil & LSFO It appears that there are no major problems with adequate supplies of 0.10% gas oil to meet the ECA & EU port demand. There is an increasing number of suppliers offering alternative LSFO. These include:- BP - ARA Lukoil - Mermansk Total ARA Cepsa Algeciras, L.Palmas Phillips Caltex Chemoil Gulf Coast & Long Beach Shell - ARA Exxon Mobil ARA & Hamb Lukoil - Mermansk Vertex Mobile, Al Neste Helsinki region Atlantic Gulf Gulf Coast Excellence Integrity Proficiency 15

Supplier Data BP Lukoil Cepsa Phillips GS Caltex Chemoil NY/Sav Chemoil LA Chemoil US Gulf Density 845.4 870.9 868.0 855.2 866.4 896.0 885.0 858.0 Viscosity @50C 8.78 8.24 8.8 8.6 5.54 26.3 10.5 16.84 Upper Pour 21 21-12 -12-9 -6-4 -20 Point Water 0.01 0.05 0.004 0 0.15 MCR Lt 0.10 0.29 0.1 0.04 1.88 3.8 0.1 Lt 0.01 Sulphur Lt0.03 0.09 0.05 0.06 0.1 Lt0.1 0.085 0.084 TSP 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.05 0.01 Ash Lt 0.01 0.001 0.01 0.06 0.005 0.003 Aluminium Lt 1 6 Lt 5 Lt 1 Silicon Lt 1 1 Lt5 2 Vanadium Lt 1 Lt 1 Lt 0.1 2 Lt 1 Lt 1 Sodium Lt 1 1 4 1 4 Net Calorific 43 42.7 42.8 43 42.7 42 42.5 42.8 Acid Number 0.04 0.15 0.27 2.35 0.1 CCAI 794 792 793 764 Est Cet No. 80.4 58.5 Lubricity 326 270 410 310 16

Independent test Data Exxon Shell Total Vertex Unknown HDME 50 ULSF Marine Density 908.8 889.3 873.8 858.1 990.9 Viscosity 53.9 31 8.93 16.64 18 @50C Upper 6 18-9 -9-36 Pour Point Water 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.1 MCR 0.28 2.31 1.91 0.01 9.8 Sulphur 0.08 0.1 0.1 0.08 0.07 TSP 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Ash 0.002 0.003 0.002 0 0.01 Aluminiu 0.8 5 0 0 2 m Silicon 1.1 3 0.6 0 5 Vanadium 2.7 0 0.7 0 10 Sodium 0.1 10 1.7 0 1 Net 42.26 42.47 42.69 42.87 41.10 Calorific Acid 0.1 0.07 0.25 0.2 0.06 Number CCAI 794 792 793 764 894 17

ExxonMobil HDME 50 Heavy Distillate Higher flash point than MGO Viscosity 25 45 cst @ 50 C Density 895-915 kg/m³ @ 15 C Pour point 15-30 C Low in catalyst fines Produced at Antwerp refinery launch date mid 2014 ISO 8217 compliant? Fails distillate specs for viscosity, density, pour point Meets residual fuel spec RMD 80 18

ExxonMobil HDME 50 Performance claims Advantages No thermal shock at switch-over Reduced risk of boiler explosions Lubricity additive not required Higher energy content (compared with DMA) Disadvantages Cleaning effect in storage tanks > filter blocking High pour point > heated storage Possible compatibility issues, limit co-mingling to 2% 19

ExxonMobil AFME 200 Advanced fuel oil Processed to remove sulphur, metals and other contaminants Meets ISO 8217 spec for RME 180 Viscosity 67cSt @ 50 C (typical) Density 917 kg/m³ @ 15 C (typical) Pour point 0 C (typical) CCAI 799 Available from Southampton launch date March 2015 20

ExxonMobil AFME 200 Performance claims Reduced risk of thermal shock compared with MGO (90 C for 15 cst at injectors) Extended engine life - reduced metals and other contaminants Fully compatible with ExxonMobil HDME 50 and MGO 21

Shell ULSFO Ultra low sulphur fuel oil Typical properties Flash point > 60 C Viscosity 10 60 cst @ 50 C Density 790-910 kg/m³ @ 15 C Availability ARA, Montreal, Gulf Coast Launch Dec 2014 NY Harbour, Singapore 2015 22

Shell ULSFO Performance claims Advantages Reduced risk of thermal shock compared with MGO Good lubricity - additive not required Good ignition properties Disadvantages Possible compatibility issues, limit comingling to 2% Beware of cleaning effect blocked filters Cylinder oil issues use lower TBN oil 23

Lukoil ULSFO Flash point > 60 C Viscosity 10 60 cst @ 50 C Density 790-910 kg/m³ @ 15 C Good ignition properties (paraffinic) Available in ARA, Launch Dec 2014 Beware of cleaning effect blocked filters Avoid mixing - compatibility issues possible Cylinder oil issues use lower TBN oil 24

The new fuels on offer Some come from Hydrocracker cycle oils and bottoms Some DMB type products Some are from multiple blends including a sulphur reduced residual. Others could be from recycled used oils Product description can be vague and confusing. 25

Alternative 0.1% fuels The products are all very different They would not meet any of the ISO Distillate grades Density range 845.0 910.0 kg/cum Viscosity range 8cSt 70cSt @50C Pour Point range -20 to + 22 deg C Low metals, good ignition, low acid, good lubricity. As with Gas Oil they may not be compatible with HFO. 26

Ship Operational Issues 1. Storage 2. Segregation 3. Heating 4. Changeover 5. Availability Excellence Integrity Proficiency 27

High Sulphur F.O. Delivery manifold Settling tank Service tank Purifiers Supply and booster pumps Transfer pump Filters Heaters Primary tanks Deep Double bottom Wing Note: One primary tank may have Been used to store 1.0% LSFO up until 2015 Some ships have two settling and service tanks HSFO & LSFO 28

Delivery manifold Segregated from HSFO Settling tank Service tank Gas Oil or 0.1% sulphur fuel. Traditional MDO/Gas Oil tanks have no heating coils Storage tank Segregated from HSFO Could be a tank previously used for HFO after cleaning Transfer pump Purifiers for distillate only Supply and booster pumps Filters Cooler?? Primary tanks Deep Double bottom Wing Some ships use HSFO circulating and booster pumps. Others have dedicated LSFO system 29

Delivery manifold Segregated from HSFO Settling tank Service tank Gas Oil or 0.1% sulphur fuel. Purifiers for distillate only Supply and booster pumps HSFO supply Storage tank Segregated from HSFO Could be a tank previously used for HFO after cleaning Transfer pump Filters Cooler?? Primary tanks Deep Double bottom Wing Some ships use HSFO circulating and booster pumps. Others have dedicated LSFO system 30

Commercial Issues 1. Purchase and Supply specifications 2. Significance of some characteristics being out of specification 3. Charterparty quality clauses 4. Price 5. Storage and Transportation 6. Additives Excellence Integrity Proficiency 31

Purchase and Supply Specifications Most of these fuels are distillates but do not conform with ISO distillate grades Some may meet with ISO low viscosity residual fuel grades but beware of different quality characteristics between residual grades and the test methods to be used Routine testing labs need to be aware of the type of fuel ordered and compare test results against the correct specification and not assume an ISO grade Most likely that supply quality for contract purposes would be based upon Supplier specification rather than ISO 32

Significance of quality not meeting specification As with all fuels the deviation from the specification may give rise to commercial and technical claims and disputes In each case the deviation would need to be evaluated and consideration given to the potential consequences 33

Charterparty clauses These typically contain reference to ISO grades If the charterer wants to supply any of these alternative fuels he will need to agree with the ship owner who would need to be satisfied that the fuel is suitable for his particular vessel Pour point and storage temperature may be critical 34

Price Most of these alternative fuels should be cheaper than gas oil 35

Storage and Transportation Suppliers will need to ensure high pour point fuels are kept at temperature at least 10deg C above their pour point throughout the supply chain These fuels have a tendency to clean tanks and lines of pre-existing residual deposits and they should only be supplied through clean designated systems Ship s tanks and lines must be free of residue 36

Additives There is a potential for pour point modifiers but these would be added in the supply chain rather than on board ship Additive price may make these fuels less attractive. 37

Conclusions These alternative fuels have merits In particular they are low in metals, stable and provide high energy with good igniition and combustion qualities Pour point and storage temperature need consideration They must be segregated from residual fuels (but this is also the case with gas oil) May not be compatible with other alternative fuels. Those with residual component may not be compatible with gas oil. CFPP could become an issue but test is only appropriate on some of these fuels Ship s crew MUST know what they are getting and manage storage and treatment on board accordingly More attractive for use on ships that trade in ECAs where there is a regular supply of similar product No reports of problems to date! Forget compliance with existing ISO grades as this is not helpful! 38

FOR YOUR ATTENTION 39