CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

Similar documents
CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

RSA Protective Technologies

FAAC International, Inc.

Virginia Department of Transportation

CRASH TESTING OF RSA/K&C ANTI-RAM FOUNDATION BOLLARD PAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIPLOMATIC SECURITY SD-STD-02.

The Center for Auto Safety

The Center for Auto Safety

COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 207 SEATING SYSTEMS

REPORT NO. TR-P NC SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 223 REAR IMPACT GUARDS 2007 TRANSFREIGHT TECHNOLOGY NHTSA NO.

REPORT NUMBER TR-P NC SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

ASTM F TEST M30 ON THE RSS-3000 DROP BEAM SYSTEM

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT FORD MOTOR COMPANY 2009 FORD F150 2-DOOR PICKUP

REPORT NUMBER TR-P NC SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS CHRYSLER LLC 2009 DODGE JOURNEY 5-DOOR MPV

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY HONDA MOTOR COMPANY 2007 HONDA ACCORD 4-DOOR SEDAN

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION 2008 MAZDA CX-9 SUV

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 111. REARVIEW MIRRORS (Other Than School Buses)

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 111. REARVIEW MIRRORS (Other Than School Buses)

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Chevrolet Malibu

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 111. REARVIEW MIRRORS (Other Than School Buses)

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 202a Head Restraints

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF OCCUPANT ENTRAPMENT FORD TAURUS INTO REAR OF FORD EXPLORER 30% OFFSET, 70 MPH. Test Date: August 3, 2010

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Toyota Prius

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware

TEST REPORT FOR: The Tracy Law Firm Honda Fit 5-Door Hatchback TESTED TO: 64.4 km/h 40% Moderate Overlap Frontal Impact PREPARED FOR:

CLASSIFICATION NOTES. Type Testing Procedure for. Crankcase Explosion Relief Valves

VERIFICATION & VALIDATION REPORT of MGS Barrier Impact with 1100C Vehicle Using Toyota Yaris Coarse FE Model

REPORT NUMBER: NCAP305I-MGA NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (NCAP) FMVSS No. 305 Indicant Test

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Toyota Camry

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

STI Project: Barrier Systems, Inc. RTS-QMB Longitudinal Barrier. Page 38 of 40 QBOR1. Appendix F (Continued) Figure F-3

Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version II) February 2019

State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation for Motor Vehicles. Protocol No. 1003/UO/MMB/W/94-12

GENERAL TESTING LABORATORIES, INC LEEDSTOWN ROAD COLONIAL BEACH, VIRGINIA 22443

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Scion xb

SPCT Method. The SPCT Method - Testing of Dog Crates. Utskrivet dokument är ostyrt, dvs inte säkert gällande.

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 201 Occupant Protection In Interior Impact Upper Interior Head Impact Protection

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 214S SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION (STATIC)

Fuel System Integrity

July 10, Refer to: HSA-10/CC-78A

REPORT NUMBER: 214P-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 214 DYNAMIC SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION RIGID POLE

Draft for comments only Not to be cited as East African Standard

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version 1) December 2018

REPORT NUMBER: 120-MGA

TEST METHODS CONCERNING TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT

REPORT NUMBER: 120-MGA

REPORT NUMBER: 131-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 131 SCHOOL BUS PEDESTRIAN SAFETY DEVICES

Occupant Restraint Systems in Frontal Impact

Active Bollards An aesthetic solution to a complex need

Low-Speed Crash Test Protocol (Version V) May 2002

TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 138 TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEMS

CNG Fuel System Integrity

Electronic Reporting

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

REPORT NUMBER: 214P-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 214 DYNAMIC SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION RIGID POLE

REPORT NUMBER: 214P-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 214 DYNAMIC SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION RIGID POLE

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY

REPORT NUMBER: 305-MGA

PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS DELTA MODEL DSC 1500 PORTABLE BEAM - CRASH CERTIFIED BARRIER SYSTEM

MASH Test 3-11 on the T131RC Bridge Rail

City of Storm Lake Fire Department Heavy Rescue Specifications

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

5. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY 5.1 STRUCTURAL STRENGTH AND DISTORTION TESTS - STRUCTURAL SHAKEDOWN TEST 5.1-I. DISCUSSION

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS

EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNTERMEASURES IN RESPONSE TO FMVSS 201 UPPER INTERIOR HEAD IMPACT PROTECTION

NCHRP Report 350 Test 4-12 of the Modified Thrie Beam Guardrail

2.0 TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS Vibration Test TEST EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 7 ATTACHMENTS

ISO 8855 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Road vehicles Vehicle dynamics and road-holding ability Vocabulary

June 5, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-178. Mr. Kevin K. Groeneweg Mobile Barriers LLC Genesee Trail Road Golden, CO Dear Mr.

CRASH TEST OF MILE POST MARKER. T. J. Hirsch Research Engineer. and. Eugene Buth Assistant Research Engineer. Research Report Number 146-8

REPORT NUMBER: 111SB-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111SB SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

REPORT NUMBER: 305-MGA

Methodologies and Examples for Efficient Short and Long Duration Integrated Occupant-Vehicle Crash Simulation

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 114 THEFT PROTECTION

Advances in Simulating Corrugated Beam Barriers under Vehicular Impact

SHORT PAPER PCB OBLIQUE COLLISIONS ENGINEERING EQUATIONS, INPUT DATA AND MARC 1 APPLICATIONS. Dennis F. Andrews, Franco Gamero, Rudy Limpert

SFI SPECIFICATION 35.2 EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 29, 2014 *

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

Incomplete Vehicle Document 2014 Model Year NOTE:

REPORT NUMBER: 111-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111 SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

HEAVY-DUTY 500,000-MILE BUS WITH A MINIMUM SERVICE LIFE OF 12 YEARS 5. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY

Analysis of Tire Rub Rail Interaction

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

AGATE (ADVANCED GENERAL AVIATION TRANSPORTATION EXPERIMENT PROGRAM) FULL-SCALE TEST AND DEMONSTRATION REPORT NO: C-GEN (REV N/C)

Reduced Stopping Distance: Why the Mandate?

TITLE: EVALUATING SHEAR FORCES ALONG HIGHWAY BRIDGES DUE TO TRUCKS, USING INFLUENCE LINES

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 104 WINDSHIELD WIPING AND WASHING SYSTEMS

Crashworthiness Evaluation. Roof Strength Test Protocol (Version III)

Transcription:

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH 2003 Anti-Ram Bollards Prepared for: RSA Protective Technologies, LLC 1573 Mimosa Court Upland, CA 91784 Test Report No. KARCO Engineering, LLC AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH CENTER 9270 Holly Road Adelanto, CA 92301 Tel: (760) 246-1672 Fax: (760) 246-8112 April 20, 2005

KARCO Engineering compiled this publication for information gathering only. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of any other organization. KARCO Engineering provides test services only and is not involved in consulting, product design or the manufacturing of any automotive products. KARCO does not warrant, supervise or monitor compliance of products or services except as specifically agreed to in writing. By their very nature, testing, analysis and other KARCO services are limited in scope and subject to expected measurement variability. No activity by KARCO Engineering can release a manufacturer from product or any other liability. Tested By: Reviewed By: Approved By: Approval Date: Mr. Matthew A. Ivory, Project Manager Mr. Michael L. Dunlap, Quality Assurance Mr. Frank D. Richardson, Program Manager

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Test Procedure and Instrumentation Summary 2 3 Test Results and Data Sheets 5 Table Page 1 Test Designations 2 Data Sheet Page 1 Test Vehicle Information 6 2 Test Vehicle Geometry 7 3 Evaluation of Test Results 8 4 Vehicle Accelerometer Data Summary 9 5 Camera Views and Film Speeds 10 Appendix Page A Photographs A B Data Plots B C Instrumentation List C D Manufacturers Drawings D i

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS Figure Page 1 Test Article as Received A-1 2 Excavation A-1 3 Test Article Positioned in Place A-2 4 Test Article During Installation A-2 5 Test Article During Installation A-3 6 Test Article During Installation A-3 7 Bollard Foundation Module A-4 8 Bollard Foundation Module A-4 9 Test Article During Installation A-5 10 Test Article During Installation A-5 11 Test Article During Installation A-6 12 Test Article During Installation A-6 13 Test Article During Installation A-7 14 Test Article During Installation A-7 15 Test Article Front View A-8 16 Test Article Left Side View A-8 17 Pre-Test Front View A-9 18 Test Set-Up A-9 19 Pre-Test Front Left Side View A-10 20 Pre-Test Left Side View A-10 21 Pre-Test Left Side View Close-up A-11 22 Test Article Orientation to Front Bumper A-11 23 Test Article Orientation to Front Bumper A-12 24 Test Article Orientation to Front Bumper A-12 25 Pre-Test Left Rear Side View A-13 26 Ballast A-13 27 Post-Test Left Side View A-14 28 Post-Test Left Side View Close-Up A-14 29 Post-Test Front Left Side View Close-Up A-15 30 Post-Test Front View A-15 31 Post-Test Left Rear Side View A-16 32 Ballast A-16 33 Post-Test Test Article Front View A-17 34 Post-Test Test Article Front Right Side View A-17 35 Post-Test Test Article Front Left Side View A-18 36 Post-Test Test Article Left Side View A-18 37 Center Bollard Deflection A-19 38 Post-Test Concrete Displacement A-19 39 Post-Test Concrete Damage A-20 40 Post-Test Concrete Damage A-20 41 Action Sequence 1 A-20 ii

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS (CONTINUED) 42 Action Sequence 2 A-21 43 Action Sequence 3 A-22 44 Action Sequence 4 A-22 TABLE OF CONTENTS...(CONTINUED) LIST OF DATA PLOTS Plots Page B-1 Vehicle Rear Frame Rail X B-1 Vehicle Rear Frame Rail Y B-1 Vehicle Rear Frame Rail Z B-1 Vehicle Rear Frame Rail Resultant B-1 B-2 Vehicle Rear Frame Rail X Velocity B-2 Vehicle Rear Frame Rail X Displacement B-2 Table INSTRUMENTATION LIST Page C-1 Instrument Data Channel Assignments C-1 Figure MANUFACTURERS DRAWINGS Page 1 Manufacturers Test Article Layout Drawing D-1 iii

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this crash test was to determine if the tested vehicle impact-rated barrier meets the minimum performance standards of the United States Department of State Specification for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers and Gates (SD-STD-02.01, Revision A). This report presents the results of the performance and evaluation of one (1) full-scale crash test conducted on an RSA Anti-Ram Bollard system with 5 inch footings (ID=K8B5F5T). All tests were conducted in accordance with current SD-STD-02.01, Revision A, requirements for test designation K8. Procedures for receiving, inspecting, installation, testing and reporting of test results are described in the test procedure and are not repeated in this report. The purpose of this test was to evaluate the crash performance of the Anti-Ram Bollards. 1.2 TEST FACILITY All tests were conducted at KARCO Engineering s crash test facility in Adelanto, California. The tow road is constructed of reinforced concrete, presents a continuous level surface, and measures 850 feet in length. The width of the tow road is twelve feet with a thickness of six inches. A steel rail is embedded in the approach surface to provide vehicle guidance. Vehicle tow propulsion is provided by a 1 ton truck using a 1-to-2 pulley system coupled to a fixed prime mover (an internal combustion engine, Chevrolet V-8, 454 cubic inches displacement, with T-400 automatic transmission) and continuous cable drive system. The test vehicle is towed to within two feet of the barricade by a nylon rope clamped to a 3/8-inch steel cable. The clamp is released from the cable on contact with a cable release mechanism positioned to allow the test vehicle to proceed under its own momentum for the final two feet of travel before impacting the test array. 1.3 TEST ARTICLE Unit consists of 5, 40 inch high, 10 inch diameter Anti-Ram Bollards. The bollards have a 1 inch wall thickness and are filled with concrete during installation. Bollards are equally spaced at a distance of 4 foot 6 inches center to center. The system has a 5 inch Footings that is installed 1.5 inches below the level concrete surface. 1

SECTION 2 TEST PROCEDURE AND INSTRUMENTATION SUMMARY 2.1 TEST PROCEDURE To meet the recommended properties of SD-STD-02.01-Rev A. impact requirements, a commercially available production model test vehicle was selected. This test was conducted using a 1985 Chevrolet Diesel 70, medium duty truck with conventional cab, front mounted diesel engine, rear wheel drive and an automatic transmission. The vehicle was in good condition, was free of major body damage, and was not missing any structural components. The bumpers were standard equipment and were not modified for this test. The materials, assembly instructions and physical configuration of the test article are specified in the manufacturer s documentation and are not repeated in this test report. Installation of the test article was conducted by the manufacturer. The test article, as installed at the test facility, is illustrated in Appendix A. 2.2 IMPACT CONDITIONS As recommended in SD-STD-02.01-Rev A test specification, the following full-scale crash test was conducted to evaluate the impact performance of the Anti-Ram Bollards. The primary intent of this test is to evaluate the ability of the bollards to arrest a 15,000 pound vehicle from penetrating or vaulting into a secured area and the extent, if any, of barrier deformation 2.2.1 Test Mass. The specific mass (gross weight) of the test vehicle as specified in the standard is 15,000 pounds (lb.) ±200 lb. The test weight, with instrumentation and ballast, was 14,840 lb. 2.2.2 Speed. Vehicle speed at impact with the test article shall be dependent on the condition designation as outline in Table 1. For this test designated as K8, the velocity at impact was 38.58 mph. Table 1. Test Designations IMPACT SPEED (mph) CONDITION DESIGNATION MINIMUM NOMINAL MAXIMUM K4 28.0 30.0 37.9 K8 38.0 40.0 46.9 K12 47.0 50.0 56.9 2

2.2.3 Approach Angle and Impact Point. The test vehicle is oriented such that it approaches the test article at a critical impact angle of ninety degrees (90 ±3º), relative to the roadway, with the centerline of the vehicle impacting the test article at the impact point designated by the DOS Technical Representative. The actual center of the impact point must be within ± 1 foot (ft.) of the target. The impact point designated for this test was the middle of the test article. The actual point of impact was perpendicular to and within 2 inches of the target. 2.3 TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA ACQUISITION PROCEDURES All testing and data acquisition for this RSA Anti-Ram Bollard system with 5 inch footings (ID=K8B5F5T) certification test was performed in accordance with the SD-STD-02.01-Revision A test specification requirements. Appendix C contains a list of the instrumentation used in the performance of this test. 2.3.1 On-Board Data Acquisition. MDAS is an acronym for Miniature Data Acquisition System. The system is comprised of a 3-channel module. The module functions as a stand-alone, all-in-one unit with integral tri-axial accelerometer, computer control, signal conditioning, A/D circuitry, memory storage and battery pack. All functions are controlled by an off-board notebook or other PC compatible computer. Once the off-board computer initializes the system, it is designed to collect data with no off-board support. 2.3.2 Test Vehicle Instrumentation. Located near the vehicle rear frame rail, the test vehicle was instrumented with a tri-axial accelerometer to measure longitudinal (x), lateral (y) and vertical (z) acceleration. Data was recorded using the on-board MDAS three (3) channel module. Data was linked to a personal computer and processed using the MDAS crash test software. All equipment used in this test meets the requirements of SAE J211. 2.3.3 TDAS Software. The software utilized in this system is written in National Instruments LabWindows/CVI (C, Visual Interface) programming language, which is a Windows based (3.1 or Windows 95) software package with emphasis on ease of use and good engineering test practices. 2.3.4 SAE Compatibility. The software contains standard point and click processing options for selecting Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) class post filters and calculating the required integrals, resultants, Head Injury Criteria (HIC), clips, and other data processing parameters that may be required. 3

2.3.5 Photographic Documentation. Photographic documentation of this test included three (3) realtime video cameras and (4) high-speed color digital video cameras at 1000 fps set up for an overhead view, a driver side view perpendicular to the point of impact a driver side view with a pre-determined angle to the point of impact and a frontal view. All high-speed cameras were activated by a pressure sensitive tape switch, which was positioned on the test article to indicate the instant of contact (time zero). A digital still camera was used for documenting the pre- and post-test condition of the test vehicles and Anti Ram Bollards. 2.3.6 Test Article Instrumentation. None 4

SECTION 3 TEST RESULTS AND DATA SHEETS 3.1 TEST DESIGNATION K8 This forty miles per hour (38.58 mph) frontal impact crash test was conducted using a commercially available 1985 Chevrolet Diesel 70, medium duty truck to determine if the tested vehicle impact-rated bollards meet the minimum performance standards of SD-STD-02.01-Rev. A. The primary intent of this test was to evaluate the ability of the barrier to arrest a 15,000-pound vehicle from penetrating or vaulting into a secured area and the extent, if any, of bollard deformation. This was accomplished by measuring the vehicle penetration at the specified level of kinetic energy. The test article was positioned at an angle of ninety degrees (90 ) to the direction of travel of the impacting test vehicle, with the vehicle s centerline impacting the middle section of the bollard system. The vehicle was instrumented with a tri-axial accelerometer at the rear frame rail. This crash test was documented by four (4) real-time video cameras, and four (4) high-speed digital color cameras. Photographs of the test vehicle and the anti ram bollards are shown in Appendix A. 3.2 PRIMARY TEST RESULTS Test K8 was conducted on April 20, 2005. The test inertial weight of the vehicle was 14,840 lb. Test vehicle information is presented in Data Sheet No. 1 and Data Sheet No. 2. The test vehicle impacted the center of the barrier gate at a velocity of 38.58 mph. The evaluation of the anti ram bollard performance is presented in data Sheet No. 3. The vehicle was completely arrested by the barrier system. Pre- and Post-test photographs of the impact vehicle as well as of the bollards are shown Appendix A. Data plots of the event are presented in appendix B. The vehicle sustained severe damage to the entire cab. 5

DATA SHEET NO. 1 TEST VEHICLE INFORMATION Test Vehicle: 15,000 Ib. Truck Test No.: P25076-01 Test Program: RSA Bollards with 5 in. Footings Test Date: 4/20/05 Make Model Body Style VIN Color Odometer Reading Transmission Final Drive TEST VEHICLE INFORMATION Chevrolet Cylinders Diesel 70 Engine Displ. (L) Truck Engine Placement 1GBM7DIGF218403 Fuel Type White No. of Axles 290474 Disc Brakes, Front Automatic Disc Brakes, Rear Rear Anti-lock Brakes 8 8.2 Longitudinal Diesel Unknown Yes No No Manufactured By Date of Manufacture DATA FROM CERTIFICATION LABEL General Motors Corporation July-85 GVWR (lbs) GAWR Front (lbs) GAWR Rear (lbs) 31,000 12,000 19,000 DATA FROM TIRE PLACARD Measured Parameter Front Rear Max. Tire Pressure (psi) Unknown Unknown Cold Pressure (psi) 100 75 Recommend Tire Size 10-R20 10-R20 Actual Tire Size on Vehicle 10-R10 10-R10 Actual Tire Manufacturer Yokahama Yokahama VEHICLE WEIGHTS As Received (lbs) As Tested (lbs) Front Rear Total Front Rear Total Left 3440 2920 6360 4040 3370 7410 Right 3264 2880 6144 3978 3452 7430 Totals 6704 5800 12504 8018 6822 14840 Ratio(%) 54% 46% 100% 54% 46% 100% 6

DATA SHEET NO. 2 TEST VEHICLE GEOMETRY Test Vehicle: 15,000 Ib. Truck Test No.: P25076-01 Test Program: RSA Bollards with 5 in. Footings _ Test Date: 4/20/05 TEST VEHICLE GEOMETRY (mm) A 825 D 2392 G 815 K 2460 B 500 E 2808 I 585 L 2065 C 745 F 2630 J 1005 N 1890 7

DATA SHEET NO. 3 EVALUATION OF TEST RESULTS Test Vehicle: 15,000 Ib. Truck Test No.: P25076-01 Test Program: RSA Bollards with 5 in. Footings Test Date: 4/20/05 CRASH TEST ASSESSMENT PASS FAIL Penetration of the Front Edge of the Cargo Bed Limited to One Meter Beyond the Pre-Impact, Inside Edge of the Barrier. Comments: Vehicle was completely arrested by the bollard system. x 8

DATA SHEET NO. 4 - VEHICLE ACCELEROMETER DATA SUMMARY Test Vehicle: 15,000 lb Truck Project No.: P25076-01 Test Program: RSA Bollards with 5 in. Footings Test Date: 4/20/05 VEHICLE ACCELEROMETER PEAK DATA Vehicle Location Axis Units Max Time Min Time Vehicle Rear Frame Rail X X G's 13.8 70.6-24.1 80.3 Vehicle Rear Frame Rail Y Y G's 9.8 190.5-13.4 97.1 Vehicle Rear Frame Rail Z Z G's 14.1 49.9-12.7 79.8 Vehicle Rear Frame Res. N/A G's 27.0 80.1 9

DATA SHEET NO. 5 CAMERA VIEWS & FILM SPEEDS Test Vehicle: 15,000 Ib. Truck Test No.: P25076-01 Test Program: RSA Bollards with 5 in. Footings Test Date: 4/20/05 No. Camera View Location (mm) X Y Z Angle (Deg.) Lens (mm) Speed (fps) 1 Real Time (Panning) 10288-20422 -2438-4 30 2 Real Time (Side) -305-20422 -2438-4 30 3 Real Time (Rear 3/4) 18288-3658 -914 0 30 4 Real Time (Front) -57912-610 -2400 0 30 5 High Speed Digital Color (Driver's Side) 0-12802 -914 0 50 mm 1000 6 High Speed Digital Color (Overhead) 152 0-5791 -90 24 mm 1000 7 High Speed Digital Color -14935-14935 (Left Front 3/4) -1524-10 85 mm 1000 8 High Speed Digital Color -57912 (Front) 0-2438 -10 17-102 1000 All camera measurements were made relative to the point of impact. 10

APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHS A

FIGURE 1. Test Article as Received FIGURE 2. Excavation A-1

FIGURE 3. Test Article Positioned in Place FIGURE 4. Test Article During Installation A-2

FIGURE 5. Test Article During Installation FIGURE 6. Test Article During Installation A-3

FIGURE 7. Bollard Foundation Module FIGURE 8. Bollard Foundation Module A-4

FIGURE 9. Test Article During Installation FIGURE 10. Test Article During Installation A-5

FIGURE 11. Test Article During Installation FIGURE 12. Test Article During Installation A-6

FIGURE 13. Test Article During Installation FIGURE 14. Test Article During Installation A-7

FIGURE 15. Test Article Front View FIGURE 16. Test Article Left Side View A-8

FIGURE 17. Pre-Test Front View FIGURE 18. Test Set-Up A-9

FIGURE 19. Pre-Test Front Left Side View FIGURE 20. Pre-Test Left Side View A-10

FIGURE 21. Pre-Test Left Side View Close-up FIGURE 22. Test Article Orientation To Front Bumper A-11

FIGURE 23. Test Article Orientation To Front Bumper FIGURE 24. Test Article Orientation To Front Bumper A-12

FIGURE 25. Pre-Test Left Rear Side View FIGURE 26. Ballast A-13

FIGURE 27. Post-Test Left Side View FIGURE 28. Post-Test Left Side View Close-Up A-14

FIGURE 29. Post-Test Front Left Side View Close-Up FIGURE 30. Post-Test Front View A-15

FIGURE 31. Post-Test Left Rear Side View FIGURE 32. Ballast A-16

FIGURE 33. Post-Test Test Article Front View FIGURE 34. Post-Test Test Article Front Right Side View A-17

FIGURE 35. Post-Test Test Article Front Left Side View FIGURE 36. Post-Test Test Article Left Side View A-18

FIGURE 37. Center Bollard Deflection FIGURE 38. Post-Test Concrete Displacement A-19

FIGURE 39. Post-Test Concrete Damage FIGURE 40. Post-Test Concrete Damage A-20

FIGURE 41. Action Sequence 1 FIGURE 42. Action Sequence 2 A-21

FIGURE 43. Action Sequence 3 FIGURE 44. Action Sequence 4 A-22

APPENDIX B DATA PLOTS B

Test Vehicle: 15,000 lb Truck Test Date: 4/20/05 Test Program: RSA Bollards with 5 in. Footings Project No.: P25076-01 20 G's 10 0-10 -20-30 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Rail X CURNO Type SAE Class Units 001 FIL 60 G's Max Time Min Time 13.8 70.6-24.1 80.3 G's 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Rail Y CURNO Type SAE Class Units 002 FIL 60 G's Max Time Min Time 9.8 190.5-13.4 97.1 G's 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Rail Z CURNO Type SAE Class Units 003 FIL 60 G's Max Time Min Time 14.1 49.9-12.7 79.8 30 G's 20 10 0-10 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Rail Resultant CURNO Type SAE Class Units 001 RES 60 G's Max Time Min Time 27.0 80.1 0.1 0.1 B-1

Test Vehicle: 15,000 lb Truck Test Date: 4/20/05 Test Program: RSA Bollards with 5 in. Footings Project No.: P25076-01 40 MPH 30 20 10 0-10 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Rail X Velocity CURNO Type SAE Class Units 001 IN1 180 MPH Max Time Min Time 38.7 7.6-1.8 257.7 Inches 100 75 50 25 0-25 -50-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Rail X Displacement CURNO Type SAE Class Units 001 IN2 180 Inches Max Time Min Time 75.6 210.8 0.0 0.0 B-2

APPENDIX C INSTRUMENTATION LIST C

RSA Bollards with 5 in. Footings Instrumentation Data Channel Assignments 4/20/05 15,000 lb Truck CH. LOCATION AXIS IDENT. NO. DESCRIPTION MFR MODEL UNITS 1 Rear Frame Rail X MDASX Accel., Vehicle block I.C.Sensor 3031-100 G 2 Rear Frame Rail Y MDASY Accel., Vehicle block I.C. Sensor 3031-100 G 3 Rear Frame Rail Z MDASZ Accel., Vehicle block I.C. Sensor 3031-100 G C-1

APPENDIX D MANUFACTURERS DRAWINGS D