Test Method D5967 Mack T-8. Version. Method: Conducted For

Similar documents
D 5966 Roller Follower Wear Test. Final Report Cover Sheet. Report Packet Version No. Conducted For:

Mack T-11 D EGR Engine Oil Test. Report Packet Version No. Conducted For

D ISM Lubricant Performance Test. Report Packet Version No. Method. Conducted For:

D ISB Lubricant Performance Test. Report Packet Version No. Method. Conducted For:

Mack T-12 EGR Engine Oil Test. Report Packet Version No. Conducted For

1P D 6681 Final Report Cover Sheet

Sequence VH Report Forms Version Conducted For

Report On Sequence IVB Evaluation Version. Conducted For. NR = Non-reference oil test RO = Reference oil test

1R SCOTE Test Procedure Form 1. Method Version Conducted For. Was This Test Run Under a Valid Calibration? (Y/N)

Report On Sequence IIIG Evaluation. Version. Conducted For. NR = Non-Reference Oil Test RO = Reference Oil Test

Two-Stroke-Cycle Gasoline Engine Lubricant Evaluation D4857 (Y350M2) ASTM TC Sequence I Test Procedure Title / Validity Declaration Page Form 1

Report Forms Test Method D 7038 L-33-1 Version Conducted For. N = Results Cannot Be Interpreted (See Comment Section)

TEST METHOD D6121 L-37 Load Evaluation VERSION CONDUCTED FOR: I = Invalid N = Results cannot be interpreted(refer to comment section)

Technical File Engine Model: MD706MX (4.2L 230) - MD706MS (4.2L 200)

Technical File and Copy of United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Statement of Compliance

Technical File and Copy of United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Statement of Compliance

Technical File and Copy of United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Statement of Compliance

INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION (IMO) Technical File and Copy of United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Statement of Compliance

Supply of Services for Detailed OEB Crude Assay Analysis

Diesel Engine Lubricant Evaluations

CODE BULLETIN C-60. American Chemistry Council Product Approval Code of Practice January 2018 Edition

Technical File D3*GL*E3

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17043:2010. ASTM INTERNATIONAL 100 Barr Harbor Drive West Conshohocken, PA Amy Meacock

Exceeding Expectations

Ceiba Crude (31.44 API, Sul WT%)

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

Certificate of Accreditation

Draft Indian Standard SYN GAS/ AMMONIA TURBO COMPRESSOR LUBRICATING OILS SPECIFICATION

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Heartland Pipeline. Heartland Pipeline Company Product Specifications. Effective Date: 10/1/2015

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION AND AIR QUALITY ENGINE INTERNATIONAL AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION CERTIFICATE

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION AND AIR QUALITY ENGINE INTERNATIONAL AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION CERTIFICATE

Additions, Revisions, or Updates

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

Crude Assay Report. Crude Oil sample marked. Barrow Crude Oil. On Behalf Of. Chevron Australia Pty Ltd. Laboratory Supervisor. Crude Assay Chemist

Sampling kits and test suites

Technical File D16-MH*CCS*E3E2C1. According to Revised MARPOL Annex VI and NOx Technical Code Contents

Phillips Texas Pipeline Company, LTD. Amarillo-Lubbock Pipeline (SAAL) Product Specifications

ASTM D Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel (B 100) Blend Stock for Distillate Fuels

MTEP Methods for Rated Parameters

Regional Laboratory, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Korukkupet Terminal, Kathivakkam High Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures ~ Fuels & Lubricants

St. Clair County Road Commission Specifications Diesel Fuels

ASTM Aviation (Turbine) Jet Fuel Sample ID: JF1211

Crude Assay, ASTM, TBP distillations, Evaluation of crude oil properties.

API Engine Oil Licensing and Certification System (EOLCS) Licensees API Lubricants Group Other Interested Parties

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)"

Container MBW12K90MC Thursday 25 Jan 2007

Sweeny to Pasadena Pipeline

National Oil Corporation Libyan Petroleum Institute. Crude oil assay Sarir crude oil

National Oil Corporation Libyan Petroleum Institute. Crude Oil Assay Messla Crude Oil

Delo 400 NG SAE 15W-40 CNG Heavy Duty Engine Oil

Phillips 66 Carrier LLC. Borger-Amarillo Pipeline (BAM) Product Specifications

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

Conversion of Peanut Oil into Jet and Diesel Fuels. Panama City, Florida 22 July 2016 Edward N. Coppola

The Effects of Engine Technology and Fuel Property on Diesel Emission

Tesoro Logistics Northwest Terminalling Company LLC Product Quality Control Guidelines

ASTM #2 Diesel Fuel Sample ID: DF21210

Small GTL A New Midstream Opportunity

SJ, SL 7.4 min 7.4 min 8.6 min 7.4 min. R&R None

NGEO REVIEW Ray Sparling, Technical Support. January 20, 2016

Certificate of Accreditation

Specifications Of Straight Run Naphtha for Exportation

Prediction of Physical Properties and Cetane Number of Diesel Fuels and the Effect of Aromatic Hydrocarbons on These Entities

COMPRESSOR OILS HYCOM VDL T 32, 46, 68, 100, 150, 220, 320

CHAPTER ELEVEN. Product Blending GASOLINE OCTANE BLENDING

Valvoline Premium Blue Plus

GENERAL SERVICE INFORMATION

MARINE ENGINE PERFORMANCE DATA [T2P PREFIX]

LONG SERVICE LIFE OILS. The Larix MED engine oils are particularly developed for all modern turbocharged, high output

PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM

DELIVERING MAXIMUM ENGINE PROTECTION

What to Expect from Your New Low (and Ultra-Low) Sulfur Fuels

On-Line NIR Analysis for Blending

aramco base oils product catalog aramco base oils Get ready for a new base oils era from the world s largest crude oil supplier.

OIL PT. Scheme Description. Oils and Fuels Analysis Proficiency Testing Scheme

Louis Dreyfus Claypool Holdings, LLC. Biodiesel Production Plant Claypool, Indiana

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

THE MODERN ENGINE OILS

Engine Oil Requirements for Volkswagen s Light Duty Diesel Engines Dr.-Ing. Sven-Oliver Kossmehl, VOLKSWAGEN AG

PART X SUB PART (B): DETAILS OF STANDARDS OF VISIBLE AND GASEOUS POLLUTANTS FROM DIESEL ENGINES FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VEHICLES

White Paper. Improving Accuracy and Precision in Crude Oil Boiling Point Distribution Analysis. Introduction. Background Information

Zürich Testing on Fuel Effects and Future Work Programme

Premium Protection for Today s Engines EXTRA PROTECTION AND VALUE. PROTECK TM ELITE K SYNTHETIC BLEND ENGINE OIL

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

IIIF Timeline 07:24 Monday, May 2,

Table of Contents. Copyright and Trademarks 5. Copyright 5 Revision 5 Disclaimer of Liability 5 Copy and Use Restrictions 5.

COLOMBIA. 2. Vehicle categories: 2.1. Categories for application with European limits. M = Passenger vehicle N = Commercial vehicle

SINGLE CYLINDER ENGINE TESTS FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF CRANKCASE LUBRICANTS

Cross-Channel Connector Pipeline

CRUDE OIL SPECIFICATIONS

Demonstration of 2 nd Generation Vegetable Oil Fuels in Advanced Engines

ULSFO (0.10) and RM (VLSFO) Category Potential future trends

Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC. Borger-Denver Pipeline Product Specifications

REPORT ON TESTING OF BIODIESEL AS AN ALTERNATE FUEL (Test Bed Results & limited Field Trial On Jan Shatabdi)

Used Oil Aeration Control for GF-5

Self-assembled VMs and the advantages of using them in modern engines. Isabella Goldmints, Rajiv Taribagil, Stuart Briggs Infineum USA, LP

SHELLSOL D60. Shell Chemicals. Data Sheet. Lemont, IL Cotton Valley, LA. Product Name

Transcription:

Method D5967 Mack T-8 Version Method: Conducted For T-8A: T-8: T-8E: V = Valid I = Invalid N = Not Interpretable The Reference Oil/Non-Reference Oil was evaluated in accordance with the test procedure. The Reference Oil/Non-Reference was not evaluated in accordance with the test procedure The Non-Reference Oil results cannot be interpreted and shall not be used in determining an average test result using multiple test criteria. Stand: Stand Run No.: Engine No.: Engine Hours: End Of Date: End Of Time: /CMIR: A Alternate Codes: A CMIR or Non-Reference Submitted By: ing Signature Typed Name Title

Method D5967 Mack T-8 Form 1 Result Summary T -8E Formulation/Stand Code: Length: A Reference Oil Non-Reference Oil CMIR No.: TMC Oil No. Lab Stand No. Stand Run No. Engine Block Serial No. Rebuild Block Hours : Lab Stand No. Stand Run No. Engine Block Serial NO. Engine Block Hours Date Started: Date Completed: EOT Time: Date Started: Date Completed: EOT Time: Oil Oil Code: Code: SAE Viscosity: SAE Viscosity: Viscosity Slope 100-150 h, cst/h Viscosity Slope 100-150 h, cst/h Viscosity Increase At 3.8% TGA, cst Viscosity Increase At 3.8% TGA, cst Correction Factor, Vis. Inc. at 3.8% TGA Correction Factor, Vis. Inc. at 3.8% TGA Severity Adjustment For Viscosity Inc. At 3.8% TGA, cst Final Viscosity Increase At 3.8% TGA, cst Final Viscosity Increase At 3.8% TGA, cst Relative Viscosity At 4.8%, TGA (50% Loss) B Relative Viscosity At 4.8%, TGA (50% Loss) B Correction Factor, Relative Vis. (50% Loss) Correction Factor, Relative Vis. (50% Loss) Severity Adjustment For Relative Viscosity Final Relative Viscosity (50% Loss) Final Relative Viscosity (50% Loss) Relative Viscosity At 4.8%, TGA (100% Loss) B Relative Viscosity At 4.8%, TGA (100% Loss) B Correction Factor, Relative Vis. (100% Loss) Correction Factor, Relative Vis. (100% Loss) Severity Adjustment For Relative Viscosity Final Relative Viscosity (100% Loss) Final Relative Viscosity (100% Loss) TGA Soot % At 250 h TGA Soot % At 250 h TGA Soot % At 300 h TGA Soot % At 300 h Average Oil Consumption At 250 h (g/kw-h) Average Oil Consumption At 250 h (g/kw-h) Oil Filter Delta At 250 h, kpa Oil Filter Delta At 250 h, kpa A length is discussed in sections 1.2, 4.1 A8.3.1 and A9.3.1 B Relative viscosities are calculated using shear loss determined by D6278

FORM 2 OPERATIONAL SUMMARY A TEST PARAMETER SPECIFICATION AVERAGE STD. DEV. MINIMUM MAXIMUM Engine Speed, r/min 1800 + 5 Torque, N-m 1369 1398 Fuel Flow, kg/h 63.28 + 0.63 Humiditv, g/kg Report Blowbv, L/min Report TEMPERATURES SPECIFICATION AVERAGE STD. DEV MINIMUM MAXIMUM Coolant Out, C 85 + 3 Coolant In. C Report Only Oil, C 100-107 Fuel In, C 40 + 1 Intake Air, C 25 + 3 Intake Manifold, C 43 + 3 Pre- Turb. (F), C 602-632 Pre-Turbo (R), C 602-632 TailPipe, C 455-474 PRESSURES SPECIFICATION AVERAGE STD.DEV MINIMUM MAXIMUM Oil Gallery, kpa 372-441 Crankcase, kpa 0.50 +0.25 Exhaust, kpa 3.1 + 0.4 Oil Filter Delta, kpa 138 Max. Inlet Air Res., kpa 2.5 + 0.25 Intake Manifold, kpa 186-199 Compressor Discharge, kpa Report Intercooler Delta, kpa 13.6 Maximum A ALL DATA VALUES SHOWN ARE BASED ON TEST LENGTH REPORTED ON FORM1 B TEST NUMBER IS: STAND STAND RUN NO. ENGINE SERIAL NO. ENGINE HOURS

FORM 3 VISCOSITY INCREASE VERSUS TIME T-8E Formulation/Stand Code 80 70 60 VISCOSITY INCREASE, cst 50 40 30 20 10 0-10 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 TEST HOURS

FORM 4 OIL ANALYSIS SUMMARY Hours Soot TGA% Viscosity (cst) Viscosity Increase From Minimum (cst) 250 (2nd) 250 (Average) Viscosity Increase @ 3.8% TGA Soot Level D6278 Un sheared Viscosity (cst), Vu D6278 Sheared Viscosity (cst), Vs Relative Viscosity @, 4.8% TGA Soot Level (50% Loss) A Relative Viscosity @, 4.8% TGA Soot Level (100% Loss) A ELEMENT Fe Pb Cu Cr Al Si Na Centrifugal Oil Filter mass: grams Parts per million (ppm) at Hour Pre- Post- Mass Gain A Relative viscosities are calculated using shear loss determined by D5278.

Supplier: TEST METHOD D5967 FORM 5 TEST FUEL ANALYSIS (LAST BATCH) Batch Identifiers: Measurement Specs. Analysis Method NEW EOT Total Sulfur, % wt 0.03-0.05 D 129 Gravity, API 32-36 D 287 or D 4052 Hydrocarbon Composition Aromatics % vol 28-35 D 1319 Olefin Report D 1319 Saturates Report D 1319 Cetane Index Report D 4737 Cetane No. 42-48 D 613 Copper Strip Corrosion 3 max D 130 Flash Point, C 54 min D 93 Cloud Point C -12 max D 2500 Pour Point C -18 max D97 Carbon Residue on 10% Residium, % 0.35 max D 524 (10 % Bottoms) Water & Sediment, % Vol 0.05 max D 2709 Ash, % wt 0.01 max D482 Viscosity, cst @ 40 C 2.0-3.2 D445 Distillation C IBP 177-199 D 86 10% 210-232 D 86 50% 249-277 D 86 90% 299-327 D 86 EP 327-360 D 86

FORM 6 DOWN TIME AND COMMENTS Number of Downtime Occurrences Date Downtime Reasons Hours Total Downtime Other Comments Number of Comment Lines

FORM 6A DOWN TIME AND COMMENTS Number of Downtime Occurrences Date Downtime Reasons Hours Total Downtime Other Comments Number of Comment Lines

FORM 6B DOWN TIME AND COMMENTS Number of Downtime Occurrences Date Downtime Reasons Hours Total Downtime Other Comments Number of Comment Lines

FORM 7 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DATA ACQUISTION SYSTEM PARAMETER (1) SENSING DEVICE (2) CALIBRATION FREQUENCY (3) RECORD DEVICE (4) OBSERVATION FREQUENCY (5) RECORD FREQUENCY (6) LOG FREQUENCY (7) SYSTEM RESPONSE (8) Temperatures OIL@ FILT. FUEL IN. INTAKE AIR INTAKE MAN PRE- TURB. COOL. OUT Other FUEL FLOW ENGINE RPM LOAD INLET RESTR EXH. PRESS. OIL GAL PRES LEUEND: (I) OPERATING PARAMETER (2) THE TYPE OF DEVICE USED TO MEASURE TEMPERATURE, PRESSURE OR FLOW (3) FREQUENCY AT WHICH THE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM IS CALIBRATED (4) THE TYPE OF DEVICE WHERE DATA IS RECORDED LG-HANDLOGSHEET DL -AUTOMATIC DATA LOGGER SC-STRIPCHARTRECORDER C/M -COMPUTER, USING MANUAL DATA ENTRY C/D -COMPUTER, USING DIRECT VO ENTRY (5) DATA ARE OBSERVED BUT ONLY IF RECORDED OFF SPEC. (6) DATA ARE RECORDED BUT ARE NOT RETAINED AT EOT (7) DATA ARE LOGGED AS PERMANENT RECORD, NOTE SPECIFY IF: SS -SNAPSHOT TAKEN AT SPECIFIED FREQUENCY AG/X AVERAGE OF X DATA POINTS AT SPECIFIED FREQUENCY (8) TIME FOR THE OUTPUT TO REACH 63.2% OF FINAL VALUE FOR STEP CHANGE AT INPUT

FORM 8 BUILD-UP AND HARDWARE INFORMATION TIMING Lite/HPC Offset (deg) Piston Travel to TDC (deg) Initial Timing (deg) First Timing Change (deg) First Timing Change Hour (Hrs) Second Timing Change (deg) Second Timing Change Hour (Hrs) PARTS Part Part Number Serial Number Injection Pump Turbo Charger Cylinder Head (front) Cylinder Head (rear) Pistons Injection Nozzles

FORM 9 OPERATIONAL DATA ENGINE SPEED (R/MIN) PLOT TORQUE (N-M) PLOT FUEL FLOW (KG/H) PLOT AVERAGE PRE-TURBINE TEMPERATURE ( C) PLOT TAILPIPE TEMPERATURE ( C) PLOT

FORM 10 OPERATIONAL DATA COOLANT IN TEMPERATURE ( C) PLOT COOLANT OUT TEMPERATURE ( C) PLOT OIL TEMPERATURE ( C) PLOT FUEL IN TEMPERATURE ( C) PLOT

FORM 11 OPERATIONAL DATA INTAKE AIR TEMPERATURE ( C) PLOT INTAKE MANIFOLD TEMPERATURE ( C) PLOT OIL GALLERY PRESSURE (KPA) PLOT OIL FILTER PRESSURE (KPA) PLOT

FORM 12 OPERATIONAL DATA CRANKCASE PRESSURE (KPA) PLOT EXHAUST PRESSURE (KPA) PLOT INLET AIR RESTRICTION (KPA) PLOT INTAKE MANIFOLD PRESSURE (KPA) PLOT

Form 13 American Chemistry Council Code of Practice Conformance Statement Sponsor T8E Formulation / Stand Code Number Start Time Time Zone Declarations No. 1 No. 2 All requirements of the ACC Code of Practice for which the test laboratory is responsible were met in the conduct of this test. Yes No * The laboratory ran this test for the full duration following all procedural requirements; and all operational validity requirements of the latest version of the applicable test procedure (ASTM or other) including all updates issued by the organization responsible for the test, were met. Yes No * If the response to this Declaration is No, does the test engineer consider the deviations from operational validity requirements that occurred to be beyond the control of the laboratory? Yes * No No. 3 A deviation occurred for one of the test parameters identified by the organization responsible for the test as being a special case. Yes * No (This currently applies only to specific deviations identified in the ASTM Information Letter System) Check The Appropriate Conclusion Operational review of this test indicates that the results should be included in the Multiple Acceptance Criteria calculations. *Operational review of this test indicates that the results should not be included in the Multiple Acceptance Criteria calculations. Note: Supporting comments are required for all responses identified with an asterisk. Comments Signature Typed Name Date Title

Form 13A American Chemistry Council Code of Practice Conformance Statement Sponsor T8 Formulation / Stand Code Number Start Time Time Zone Declarations No. 1 No. 2 All requirements of the ACC Code of Practice for which the test laboratory is responsible were met in the conduct of this test. Yes No * The laboratory ran this test for the full duration following all procedural requirements; and all operational validity requirements of the latest version of the applicable test procedure (ASTM or other) including all updates issued by the organization responsible for the test, were met. Yes No * If the response to this Declaration is No, does the test engineer consider the deviations from operational validity requirements that occurred to be beyond the control of the laboratory? Yes * No No. 3 A deviation occurred for one of the test parameters identified by the organization responsible for the test as being a special case. Yes * No (This currently applies only to specific deviations identified in the ASTM Information Letter System) Check The Appropriate Conclusion Operational review of this test indicates that the results should be included in the Multiple Acceptance Criteria calculations. *Operational review of this test indicates that the results should not be included in the Multiple Acceptance Criteria calculations. Note: Supporting comments are required for all responses identified with an asterisk. Comments Signature Typed Name Date Title