In-House paper on Implementation of Telescopic Tariffs in LMV-6 category

Similar documents
UP Electricity Regulatory Commission Vidyut Niyamak Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow. Public Notice

In-House Paper on the implementation of Single Part Tariff in Power Distribution

PRESS NOTE. Distribution Tariff for Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) applicable with effect from 1 June, 2015

MPSEZ Utilities Private Limited Truing up for FY and Determination of Tariff for FY

In-House Paper on Rationalizing Rural Domestic Tariff & achieving 100% Metering

TARIFF SCHEDULES FOR HIGH TENSION CONSUMERS. Table of Contents

D.P.U A Appendix B 220 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

(2) Scope. 220 CMR applies to all Distribution Companies subject to the jurisdiction of the Department.

JEA Distributed Generation Policy Effective April 1, 2018

Name and address of DISCOM with Logo. TARIFF NOTIFICATION The 22 rd March, 2018 RETAIL SUPPLY TARIFF EFFECTIVE FROM 1 st APRIL, 2018

Petition No. 1051, 1054 & 1055 of 2015 BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION LUCKNOW Date of Order :

MYPD3 tariff restructuring plan use-of-system charges. Brochure

FITCHBURG GAS AND ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY NET METERING SCHEDULE NM

A Guide to the medium General Service. BC Hydro Last Updated: February 24, 2012

Reforming the TAC and Retail Transmission Rates. Robert Levin California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division August 29, 2017

TARIFF STRUCTURE OF TNEB

CITY OF BOWLING GREEN, OHIO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELECTRIC RATE SCHEDULES

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the filing.

The Gambia National Forum on

FITCHBURG GAS AND ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY NET METERING SCHEDULE NM

SERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 7 LARGE GENERAL TIME-OF-DAY SERVICE

CITY OF BOWLING GREEN, OHIO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELECTRIC RATE SCHEDULES

kvah Billing - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

COMMERCIAL RATE SCHEDULES

NERSA CONSULTATION PAPER PROCESS. Moefi Moroeng Specialist: Wholesale Electricity Trading

a) The 2011 Net Metering and Buyback Tariff for Emission Free, Renewable Distributed Generation Serving Customer Load

216B.164 COGENERATION AND SMALL POWER PRODUCTION.

Sub : In the matter of determination of Parallel Operation Charges. MPERC, Bhopal - Petitioner

SOLAR PV INTEGRATION: ISSUES & CHALLENGES with NET METERING

Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Renewable Purchase Obligation, Its. Regulations, 2016 STATEMENT OF REASONS

Consumer Guidelines for Electric Power Generator Installation and Interconnection

THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY, DBA EVERSOURCE ENERGY. LARGE TIME-OF-DAY ELECTRIC SERVICE RATE 58 NON-MANUFACTURERS Page 1 of 5

Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission Vidyut Bhawan, J.L.Nehru Marg, Patna

ANNEXURE: TARIFF SCHEDULE

NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AN ORDER OF THE BOARD NO. P.U. 17(2017)

MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY NANTUCKET ELECTRIC COMPANY NET METERING PROVISION

H 7366 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

RATE APPLICATION MANUAL. Kansas City Board of Public Utilities

CMP271 Initial thoughts on Cost Recovery of GB Demand Transmission Charges

NESCO UTILITY. Januganj, Balasore TARIFF NOTIFICATION The 23 rd March, 2015 RETAIL SUPPLY TARIFF EFFECTIVE FROM 1 st APRIL, 2015

Tariff Circular & Tariff Schedules

Southern California Edison Rule 21 Storage Charging Interconnection Load Process Guide. Version 1.1

Net Metering Policy Framework. July 2015

ANNEXURE: TARIFF SCHEDULE TARIFF FOR SUPPLY OF ELECTRICITY AT LOW TENSION, HIGH TENSION, AND EXTRA HIGH TENSION Effective from 1 st April, 2016

PUBLIC Law, Chapter 539 LD 1535, item 1, 124th Maine State Legislature An Act To Create a Smart Grid Policy in the State

Michigan Renewable Energy Case Study

ENERGY STRATEGY FOR YUKON. Independent Power Production Policy

Anil Agarwal Dialogue 2014

Electricity Trends in Pennsylvania

Final Report. Solar feed in tariff for regional Queensland for

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Basic tariff guiding principles

SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Wheeling charges, Banking charges & Cross Subsidy Surcharge for Solar Power Generators

ENERGY STRATEGY FOR YUKON. Net Metering Policy DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION

ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION BIDYUT NIYAMAK BHAVAN UNIT-VIII, BHUBANESWAR *****************

Chapter 3.1: Electrical System

RIDER RTP REAL-TIME PRICING

National Grid. Narragansett Electric Company INVESTIGATION AS TO THE PROPRIETY OF COMPLIANCE TARIFF CHANGES. 2 nd Amended Compliance Filing

CASE NOS. 79, 80, 81 & 82 of 2017/363 Date

EXTRA ORDINARY 16 AASHAADHA, 1937(S) BIHAR ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

ANNEXURE: TARIFF SCHEDULE

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Table of contents. Page ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TABLE OF TABLES TABLE OF FIGURES

Tariff Design Issues: Approaches for Recovering Grid and System Costs

Smart Non-Residential Rate Design

Case Study Congestion Charges in Singapore

Net Metering in Illinois. Eric P. Schlaf Senior Economic Analyst Illinois Commerce Commission January 31, 2014

National Agency for Energy Regulation

GENERAL INFORMATION 15. MARKET SUPPLY CHARGE ("MSC")

Buy All Sell All Rider for Interconnection of Renewable Generation

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Understanding Impacts of Distributed Solar Generation on Cost Recovery and Rates IAMU Annual Energy Conference Preconference Seminar

Notice regarding the Competition Law Treatment of Vertical Agreements in the Motor Vehicle Trade 1

UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LIMITED

Pioneer Electric Rates and Tariffs

City of Washington, Kansas Electric Department. Net Metering Policy & Procedure For Customer-Owned Renewable Energy Resources

CUSC Panel 30 September 2016 John Martin National Grid

ROANOKE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE RATE SCHEDULES

Designing Distributed Generation Tariffs Well

P. SUMMARY: The Southeastern Power Administration (SEPA) establishes Rate Schedules JW-

Utility Operator Model

Xcel Energy Guidelines for Interconnection of Electric Energy Storage with the Electric Power Distribution System

Participation of Beacon Power s Flywheel Energy Storage Technology in NYISO s Regulation Service Market

Technical Conference: Alternative Utility Cost Recovery Mechanisms

Statement of Expected Price Trends

BC Hydro writes in compliance with Exhibit A-4 to provide its Final Submission in respect of the Application (Exhibit B-1).

Methodology of Cost Allocation

EC Task ForceforSmart Grids: Assessment framework

NET METERING. The terms set forth below shall be defined as follows, unless the context otherwise requires.

City of Lethbridge ELECTRIC UTILITY. Electric Distribution Tariff Rate Schedule

Residential Load Profiles

Planning Distributed Generation for Transmission Savings 1 By Kenneth Sahm White and Stephanie Wang 2 March 19, 2014

Cost Reflective Tariffs

City of, Kansas Electric Department. Net Metering Policy & Procedures for Customer-Owned Renewable Energy Resources

Information Packet Kissimmee Utility Authority Customer-Owned Renewable Generation Interconnection And Net Metering Program

Proposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service

RATE SCHEDULE FOR FY

Western Electricity Supply Company of Orissa Ltd., Burla, Sambalpur , Orissa

Should I Get a Solar Array for my House? The Regulations, Available Equipment, and Benefits Steven Johnson

WASHINGTON ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. NET METERING TARIFF POLICY BULLETIN NO. 38 NM

Transcription:

Date: January 23, 2017 In-House paper on Implementation of Telescopic Tariffs in LMV-6 category Background As per Section 61 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the electricity Tariff charged from any consumer should reflect the cost of supply, encourage efficiency, safeguard consumer interest and at the same time allow reasonable return on investment. The relevant extract of Section 61 of the electricity Act, 2003, has been reproduced below: Section 61. (Tariff regulations): The Appropriate Commission shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, specify the terms and conditions for the determination of tariff, and in doing so, shall be guided by the following, namely:- (a) the principles and methodologies specified by the Central Commission for determination of the tariff applicable to generating companies and transmission licensees; (b) the generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity are conducted on commercial principles; (c) the factors which would encourage competition, efficiency, economical use of the resources, good performance and optimum investments; (d) safeguarding of consumers' interest and at the same time, recovery of the cost of electricity in a reasonable manner; (e) the principles rewarding efficiency in performance; (f) multi year tariff principles; 1[(g) that the tariff progressively reflects the cost of supply of electricity and also, reduces crosssubsidies in the manner specified by the Appropriate Commission;] (h) the promotion of co-generation and generation of electricity from renewable sources of energy; (i) the National Electricity Policy and tariff policy: Further, the power has been vested under Section 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003, to the appropriate Commission, to determine the Tariff for generation, supply, transmission and wheeling of electricity, wholesale, bulk or retail. Relevant extract of the Section 86 has been reproduced below:

Section 86. (Functions of State Commission): --- (1) The State Commission shall discharge the following functions, namely: - (a) determine the tariff for generation, supply, transmission and wheeling of electricity, wholesale, bulk or retail, as the case may be, within the State: Provided that where open access has been permitted to a category of consumers under section 42, the State Commission shall determine only the wheeling charges and surcharge thereon, if any, for the said category of consumers; As per the aforementioned provisions, UPERC has continuously strived for determining tariff that effectively recovers all the cost incurred while supplying electricity to the consumer or class of consumers and at the same time promotes efficient usage of electricity. A tariff design exercise has some important principles, which the Commission follows during every tariff exercise for various categories of Consumers. In this context, the commission through the present paper intends, to assess further scope for implementation of telescopic and non-telescopic tariff for LMV-6 category of consumer. Basic Definition of Telescopic and Non-Telescopic Telescopic Tariff: Under this Tariff structure, the rate of electricity increases with the increase in consumption thereby charging the consumers non-uniformly (wherein the consumer is billed on slab wise basis). In this tariff structure first slab of consumption is billed at lower rate and the next slab of consumption billed at higher rate and so on. This tariff structure is designed such a way that there is no overlapping of slabs (e.g. 0-100 Units charged at Rs. 3.50 and 101-150 Units charged at Rs. 4.00). This tariff structure emphasizes on providing basic minimum electricity requirement at lower rates and the electricity demand for comforts and luxury at a higher rate. Non-Telescopic Tariff: Under this Tariff structure the energy consumed is cumulatively billed at one uniform rate for the entire consumption depending on the slab rate in which the consumption falls. For example a consumer is billed @ Rs. X /unit for consumption range of 0-100 Units, if his consumption exceeds above 100 Units then the consumer will be billed @ Rs. Y /unit for his entire consumption, where Y is the rate applicable for consumption range above 100 Unit and Y> X. Telescopic Tariff Structure is widely accepted over Non-Telescopic tariff among various Discoms across India due to following reasons: 1. The rate of electricity in Telescopic Tariff increases gradually with increase in consumption, thereby giving a signal to the consumer to restrict its consumption. In contrary to this, in Non- Telescopic Tariff there is increase in the tariff for the entire consumption for consumption of that extra unit beyond the slab. 2 P a g e

2. Non-Telescopic Tariff structure has implementation issues in pre-paid metering system. Existing Non-Telescopic Rate Schedule for LMV-6 for FY 2016-17 In Uttar Pradesh there is Non-Telescopic Tariff structure for LMV-6 (Small and Medium Power) consumers. The Rate Schedule for LMV-6 consumers from the Tariff Order for FY 2016-17 is provided below: LMV-6 (SMALL AND MEDIUM POWER) 1. APPLICABILITY: This schedule shall apply to all consumers of electrical energy having a contracted load up to 100 HP (75 kw) for industrial / processing or agro-industrial purposes, power loom (load of 5 kw and above) and to other power consumers, not covered under any other rate schedule. Floriculture / Mushroom farming units having loads up-to 100 BHP (75kW) shall also be covered under this rate schedule. This schedule shall also apply to pumping sets above 25 BHP. 2. CHARACTER AND POINT OF SUPPLY: As per the applicable provisions of Electricity Supply Code. 3. RATE: Rate, gives the fixed and energy charges (including the TOD rates as applicable to the hour of operation) at which the consumer shall be billed for his consumption during the billing period applicable to the category: (A) Consumers getting supply other than Rural Schedule: Contracted Load Up to 4 kw Above 4 kw to 9 kw Above 9 kw Consumption Range Up to 1000 kwh / month Up to 2000 kwh / month For above 2000 kwh / month Fixed Charge Rs. 245 / kw / month Rs. 255 / kw / month Rs. 275 / kw / month Energy Charge Rs. 7.00 / kwh on entire consumption Rs. 7.35 / kwh on entire consumption Rs. 7.60 / kwh on entire consumption 3 P a g e

TOD Rates (% of Energy Charges): 22:00 hrs 06:00 hrs (-) 7.5% 06:00 hrs 17:00 hrs 0% 17:00 hrs 22:00 hrs (+) 15% (B) Consumers getting supply as per Rural Schedule: The consumer under this category shall be entitled to a rebate of 7.5% on demand & energy charges as given for under urban schedule without TOD rates. Issue in implementing Telescopic Tariff structure for LMV-6 category As per Tariff Order for FY 2016-17, most of the categories are billed as per the Telescopic tariff structure. But for LMV-6 category, there could be Implementation problem as telescopic rates with varying TOD zones cannot be made applicable at the same time and hence non Telescopic Tariff has been specified. Example: Let s assume that units consumed by a LMV-6 Consumer in different TOD zones in a billing cycle are as follows: TOD-1 TOD-2 TOD-3 Total 500 units 300 units 400 units 1200 units As mentioned above the total units consumed by the LMV-6 consumer is 1200 units. Further considering three slab rates i.e. 0-1000 units, 1001-2000 units and above 2000 units. In this case, it is unrealistic to execute shifting of energy rates in different slabs along various time zone hence the part of TOD units under chunk of 0-1000 kwh cannot be bifurcated. It is evident from the above that TOD Tariff is very difficult to implement with Telescopic Tariff in existing scenario in a realistic manner. Way Forward- Theoretical Approach Two possible solutions for implementation of Telescopic Tariff Structure for LMV-6 Category are shown below: 4 P a g e

Assumptions taken for developing the Models are as follows: Assumption 1: Rate Schedule for LMV-6 consumer (Telescopic Tariff Structure as submitted by the Licensee for FY 2016-17) (A) Consumers getting supply other than Rural Schedule: Contracted Load Up to 4 kw Above 4 kw to 9 kw Above 9 kw Fixed Charge Rs. 245 / kw / month Rs. 255 / kw / month Rs. 275 / kw / month Consumption Range Energy Charge 0-1000 kwh / month Rs. 7.10/ kwh 1001-2000 kwh / month Rs. 7.45 / kwh For above 2000 kwh / month Rs. 7.70 / kwh TOD Rates (% of Energy Charges): 22:00 hrs 06:00 hrs (-) 7.5% 06:00 hrs 17:00 hrs 0% 17:00 hrs 22:00 hrs (+) 15% (B) Consumers getting supply as per Rural Schedule: The consumer under this category shall be entitled to a rebate of 7.5% on demand & energy charges as given for under urban schedule without TOD rates. Assumption 2: Total Units consumed by a LMV-6 consumer in a billing cycle is 3,250 units. Assumption 3: For better understanding, four scenarios have been considered depending on the energy consumed in different TOD zones as represented below: TOD Zone % of Energy Charge Scenerio-1 Scenerio-2 Scenerio-3 Scenerio-4 5 P a g e

TOD Zone % of Energy Charge Scenerio-1 Scenerio-2 Scenerio-3 Scenerio-4 22:00 hrs-6:00 hrs (-) 7.5% 2500 2000 1200 250 6:00 hrs-17:00 hrs 0% 500 700 1000 1000 17:00 hrs -22:00 hrs (+) 15% 250 550 1050 2000 MODEL-1 This Model is developed considering meter having three registers to record TOD units. In this Model first energy charge is calculated without considering TOD and after that energy charge is bifurcated as per the weight of TOD units considering corresponding percentage of TOD rebate/penalty. The total Energy Charge is obtained by adding the bifurcated energy charge arrived considered with respective TOD (% of energy charges). Steps for Calculation: Step -1: Calculate the Energy charge without considering TOD Step-2: Calculate the percentage of TOD units to the total units (i.e. Calculate the weight of TOD unit in respect to total units). Step-3: Multiply Energy Charge calculated in Step-1 with percentage (weights) as calculated in Step2 and TOD (% Energy Charge) for arriving at Total energy charge. Detailed Design: Detailed design for Model-1 is as follows. ( 4 scenarios are considered for analysis): Unit consumed by a LMV-6 consumer in billing cycle (as per assumption-2) : 3250 Units Bill amount without considering TOD Slabs: Rs. 24175 Table:-1: Units consumed under TOD slabs in different Scenarios as per assumption-3 TOD Zone Scenerio-1 Scenerio-2 Scenerio-3 Scenerio-4 22:00 hrs-6:00 hrs 2500 2000 1200 250 6:00 hrs-17:00 hrs 500 700 1000 1000 17:00 hrs -22:00 hrs 250 550 1050 2000 Table:-2: % Energy consumed in different time zone (TOD Units/Total Units) TOD Zone Scenerio-1 Scenerio-2 Scenerio-3 Scenerio-4 22:00 hrs-6:00 hrs 76.92% 61.54% 36.92% 7.69% 6 P a g e

TOD Zone Scenerio-1 Scenerio-2 Scenerio-3 Scenerio-4 6:00 hrs-17:00 hrs 15.38% 21.54% 30.77% 30.77% 17:00 hrs -22:00 hrs 7.69% 16.92% 32.31% 61.54% Table:-3: Energy Charges with TOD (Total Energy Charge X % calculated in Table:-2 X (1+TOD Percentage energy charge) TOD Zone Scenerio-1 Scenerio-2 Scenerio-3 Scenerio-4 22:00 hrs-6:00 hrs 17,201.44 13,761.15 8,256.69 1,720.14 6:00 hrs-17:00 hrs 3,719.23 5,206.92 7,438.46 7,438.46 17:00 hrs -22:00 hrs 2,138.56 4,704.83 8,981.94 17,108.46 Total Energy Charge 23,059.23 23,672.90 24,677.10 26,267.07 Inference: It can be seen from the calculations shown above, that the Model-1 may be implemented without any change in the meter, however, assumptive calculation is required to be done(shown Table:-2) to draw the end results, which can be done by the up-gradation in the billing software of the licensee. However there is the variance in the bills of consumers consuming equal total units but having different amount of energy consumed in different TOD slabs. MODEL-2 This Model is more precise than Model-1, as no assumptive calculation is required in this method. But this Model cannot be implemented in present scenario, since, implementation of this Model requires meter with nine TOD registers. It is assumed in this Model, that every slab of telescopic tariff can be read with all three TOD zones, which can be done by a nine register meter. Total Energy Charge is calculated by adding all the energy charges corresponding to the nine registers. Thus calculation of Total Energy charges is managed without any assumptive calculation. Steps for Calculation: Step-1: Meter should be designed to record TOD units for different slabs i.e. It must record TOD consumption in three time zones for 0-1000 units, next three TOD consumption in three time zones between 1001-2000 units and another three TOD consumption in three time zones for consumption above 2000 units. Step-2: Energy Charge will be calculated corresponding to the units read as per Step-1. For example, calculation for first slabs (i.e. from 0-1000 units) is as follows: 1000 units X Corresponding Energy Charge X (1+ TOD Percentage Energy Charge), 7 P a g e

Step-3: Total Energy charge will be calculated by adding all nine Energy Charges calculated, corresponding to slab rates and TOD zones as per Step-2. Detailed Design: Detailed design for Model-2 is show below, where 4 scenarios are considered for analysis: Scenario 1 Table- 1(a): Further bifurcation of TOD Units into three slabs of consumption, as shown in Scenerio-1 of Assumption-3. Unit Range Total units TOD-1 TOD-2 TOD-3 0-1000 1000 700 200 100 1001-2000 1000 800 100 100 2001-3250 1250 1000 200 50 Sum of Units 3250 2500 500 250 Table- 1(b): Calculation of Total Energy Charge corresponding to the slab wise Units consumed, shown in Table- 1(a). Units Slabs Total unit EC (Rs. /Unit) EC (TOD-1) EC (TOD-2) EC(TOD-3) Total 0-1000 1000 7.10 4597.25 1420.00 816.50 1001-2000 1000 7.45 5513.00 745.00 856.75 2001-3250 1250 7.70 7122.50 1540.00 442.75 Total Energy Charge 17232.75 3705.00 2116.00 23053.75 Scenario 2 Table- 2(a): Further bifurcation of TOD Units into three slabs of consumption, as shown in Scenerio-2 of Assumption-3. Unit Range Total units TOD-1 TOD-2 TOD-3 0-1000 1000 700 200 100 1001-2000 1000 800 100 100 2001-3250 1250 500 400 350 Sum of Units 3250 2000 700 550 8 P a g e

Table- 2(b): Calculation of Total Energy Charge corresponding to the slab wise Units consumed, shown in Table- 2(a). Total EC (Rs. Units Slabs EC (TOD-1) EC (TOD-2) EC(TOD-3) Total unit /Unit) 0-1000 1000 7.10 4597.25 1420.00 816.50 1001-2000 1000 7.45 5513.00 745.00 856.75 2001-3250 1250 7.70 3561.25 3080.00 3099.25 Total Energy Charge 13671.50 5245.00 4772.50 23689.00 Scenario 3 Table- 3(a): Further bifurcation of TOD Units into three slabs of consumption, as shown in Scenerio-3 of Assumption-3. Unit Range Total units TOD-1 TOD-2 TOD-3 0-1000 1000 300 200 500 1001-2000 1000 600 300 100 2001-3250 1250 300 500 450 Sum of Units 3250 1200 1000 1050 Table-3(b): Calculation of Total Energy Charge corresponding to the slab wise Units consumed, shown in Table- 3(a). Total EC (Rs. Units Slabs EC (TOD-1) EC (TOD-2) EC(TOD-3) Total unit /Unit) 0-1000 1000 7.10 1970.25 1420.00 4082.50 1001-2000 1000 7.45 4134.75 2235.00 856.75 2001-3250 1250 7.70 2136.75 3850.00 3984.75 Total Energy Charge 8241.75 7505.00 8924.00 24670.75 Scenario 4 Table- 4(a): Further bifurcation of TOD Units into three slabs of consumption, as shown in Scenerio-4 of Assumption-3. Unit Range Total units TOD-1 TOD-2 TOD-3 0-1000 1000 100.00 500.00 400.00 1001-2000 1000 100.00 100.00 800.00 2001-3250 1250 50.00 400.00 800.00 9 P a g e

Unit Range Total units TOD-1 TOD-2 TOD-3 Sum of Units 3250 250.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 Table- 4(b): Calculation of Total Energy Charge corresponding to the slab wise Units consumed, shown in Table- 4(a). Units Slabs Total unit EC (Rs. /Unit) EC (TOD-1) EC (TOD-2) EC(TOD-3) Total 0-1000 1000 7.10 656.75 3550.00 3266.00 1001-2000 1000 7.45 689.13 745.00 6854.00 2001-3250 1250 7.70 356.13 3080.00 7084.00 Total Energy Charge 1702.00 7375.00 17204.00 26281.00 Inference: It can be seen from the above calculation that Model-2 does not require any assumptive calculation for calculation of Total Energy Charge as in the case of Model-1. But for implementation of Model-2, it requires presently installed meters to be changed, as present meters do not have the capability to read the TOD Units consumed for all the Tariff slabs separately, further installation of new meters for all the consumers may require more investment. Comparison of Model-1 & Model-2 The Comparison of Total Energy Charge calculated as per Model-1 and Model-2 under four scenarios has been shown below: Table: Difference in the Total Energy charges calculated with Model-1 and with Model-2 under four scenarios Summary Particulars Formula Scenerio-1 Scenerio-2 Scenerio-3 Scenerio-4 Energy Charges Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Method-1 A 23059.23 23672.90 24677.10 26267.07 Method-2 B 23053.75 23689.00 24670.75 26281.00 Difference C=B-A (5.48) 16.10 (6.35) 13.93 Difference (%) D=C X100/B -0.02% 0.07% -0.03% 0.05% 10 P a g e

It can be observed from the comparison, that the Total Energy Charge calculated as per Model-1 and Model-2 is different under all scenarios, but the difference is marginal. Model-2 is more appropriate than Model-1 as it depends on real information without any assumptive calculation. Further, implementation of Model-2 requires more registers in the meter for recording the TOD units consumed for all three slabs separately, which is not possible in currently installed meters. Moreover, Model -1 can be implemented without any up gradation in meter, but it requires assumptive calculation to be performed to arrive at the final results, which may be done by up-gradation in the billing software. It may be noted there is the variance in the bills of consumers consuming equal total units but having different amount of energy consumed in different TOD slabs. Merits and De-merits of Telescopic and non-telescopic Tariff Telescopic Tariff Non Telescopic Tariff Merits: Merits: Promotes efficient use of electricity as it Promotes efficient use of electricity as it also promotes law of conservation of electricity promotes law of conservation of electricity because rate of electricity increases with because same rate is applied on entire increase in the consumption. consumption Telescopic Tariff structure ensures affordability of electricity for underprivileged sections of consumers. De-Merits: De-Merits: Discrimination among the same category of consumers as price of electricity increases with increase in consumption. Encourages the waste of electricity as in this Tariff Structure there is no motivation for less consumption, after exceeding certain units. 11 P a g e

Public Comments Comments on the above Commission s In-House Paper may be submitted by all stakeholders and public at large to the Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission on or before February 15, 2017 at the following address: Secretary, U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2nd Floor, Kisan Mandi Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow - 226010 Email Id: secretary@uperc.org Phone No.: 0522-2720426 www.uperc.org 12 P a g e