CITY OF GILROY 2012 SPEED SURVEY

Similar documents
Applicable California Vehicle Code Sections, 2015 Edition

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

Engineering and Traffic Survey

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Evaluation of Request to Establish 15 MPH Speed Limits on Streets around Schools

Assistant General Manager

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. Speed Limit. Sellas Road North/Sellas Road South; Ladera Ranch; TB 952-F1. Traffic Engineering.

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

Establishing Realistic Speed Limits

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

traversing them. Speed dips may be installed in lieu of speed humps where the 85 th percentile speed on a street is at least 36 mph.

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

Effective Speed Zoning Why and How

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

85th. HB 87 vs 85 Percentile Speed

DATE: August 13, 2013 AGENDA ITEM # 8. City Council. Cedric Novenario, Transportation Manager RECOMMENDATION:

CHAPTER 69 PARKING REGULATIONS

TITLE VII: TRAFFIC CODE

POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION. Effective Date: July 10, 2013

CHAPTER 14 TRAFFIC CODE THE MINNESOTA HIGHWAY TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT.

Speed measurements were taken at the following three locations on October 13 and 14, 2016 (See Location Map in Exhibit 1):

POLICIES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPEED HUMPS (Amended May 23, 2011)

SIGNING UPDATES MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), 2009 EDITION. CLIFF REUER SDLTAP WESTERN SATELLITE (c)

800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

CHAPTER 11 SNOWMOBILES AND ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES SNOWMOBILE AND ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE REGULATIONS

TITLE 16. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 27. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

Chapter 17 TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES. Adoption of Uniform Rules of the Road. Temporary Traffic Regulations.

Speed Zoning. District Traffic Engineer ISHC, Seymour, Indiana

TRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS

TITLE VII: TRAFFIC CODE 70. GENERAL PROVISIONS 71. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS 72. PARKING REGULATIONS 73. TRAFFIC SCHEDULES 74.

As Reported by the House Local Government Committee. 131st General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No

SPEED HUMP POLICY. It is the policy of Hamilton Township to consider requests for speed humps as outlined below:

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Memorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017

CAR 10-1 TRAFFIC CALMING CAR 10-1 OPR: Engineering 06/06

TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy

o or Violating What They Capture?

3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY

CITY CLERK. Warrants for All-Way Stop Sign Control and 40 km/h Maximum Speed Limits

ATTACHMENT ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY

CITY OF VALLEJO. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Engineering Division

Plainfield, Indiana Speed Limit Study

TITLE 15 MOTOR VEHICLES, TRAFFIC AND PARKING 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS

Traffic Regulations Guidelines

Slow Down! Why speed is important in realizing your Vision Zero goals and how to achieve the speeds you need

2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Access Management Standards

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

a. A written request for speed humps must be submitted by residents living along the applicable street(s) to the Public Works Department.

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

San Antonio Municipal Code Selected Sections

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO STAFF REPORT. January 5, 2016

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. South Fork Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 30N44

CHAPTER 71: TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

Ramsey, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - CODE OF ORDINANCES >> Chapter 54 - TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES >> ARTICLE IV. - RECREATIONAL VEHICLES >>

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER

traffic markings. (Ord , )

IC Chapter 5. Speed Limits

CHAPTER XIV. TRAFFIC ARTICLE 1. STANDARD TRAFFIC ORDINANCE

CONSTRUCTION PARKING MANAGEMENT POLICY

Act 229 Evaluation Report

EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO.

City of, Kansas Electric Department. Net Metering Policy & Procedures for Customer-Owned Renewable Energy Resources

RESTRICTIONS ON PARKING; POSTED LIMITATIONS.

Existing Traffic Conditions

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLESEX CENTRE BY-LAW NUMBER

ENTUCKY RANSPORTATION C ENTER

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Town of Odessa Town Council continues to strive for the economic benefit of the Town;

Created by: St. Louis County

CHAPTER 69 PARKING REGULATIONS

1200 ZONES AND STUDIES Traffic Engineering Manual

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

Vista Municipal Code

TOWN OF LEICESTER COMMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PARKING RULES & REGULATIONS

Chapter 70 TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES*

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

1200 ZONES AND STUDIES Traffic Engineering Manual

CITY OF PLACENTIA RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES 2017

GARWIN, IOWA CHAPTER 62 CHAPTER 62 GENERAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 9 PARKING REGULATIONS (SEE CHAPTER 7 FOR DEFINITIONS, SCOPE AND APPLICATION RELATING TO THIS CHAPTER)

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan 2040

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF GUELPH/ERAMOSA BY-LAW

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 903, PARKING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. Chapter 903 PARKING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

Low Speed Design Criteria for Residential Streets Andrew J. Ballard, P.E. and David M. Haldeman, E.I.T.

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

Emergency Signal Warrant Evaluation: A Case Study in Anchorage, Alaska

CHAPTER 69 PARKING REGULATIONS

The Design-Builder shall meet local road criteria provided by the local governing agencies.

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Transcription:

CITY OF GILROY 2012 SPEED SURVEY GILROY, CALIFORNIA Final Report Prepared For City of Gilroy Public Works Department Gilroy, California May 17, 2013 Adopted by City Council on July 13, 2013 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc

City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Hatch Mott MacDonald being obtained. Hatch Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement, to indemnify Hatch Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Hatch Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Hatch Mott MacDonald accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether contractual or tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Hatch Mott MacDonald and use by Hatch Mott MacDonald in preparing this report. 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page i

City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 2 SPEED LIMIT AND SPEED ZONE CALCULATIONS... 2 2.1 Blanket Traffic Regulations... 2 2.2 Speed Limit Signs and Markings... 4 3 TRAFFIC COLLISION HISTORY... 6 3.1 Traffic Collision Data... 6 4 SPEED SURVEY RESULTS... 9 4.1 Field Speed Surveys... 9 4.2 Speed Survey Results... 9 5 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT CHANGES... 16 5.1 Establishing Speed Limits... 16 5.2 Existing Speed Limits to Remain... 18 5.3 Recommended Speed Limit Modifications... 5.4 Recommended Additional Speed Limit Signs... 32 5.5 Recommended Speed Zone Transition Signs... 32 6 CONCLUSION... 34 7 REFERENCES... 7.1 List of References... 7.2 List of Contacts... 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page ii

City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey LIST OF TABLES 1. COLLISION DATA 2. SPEED SURVEY DATA LIST OF EXHIBITS 1. CALIFORNIA ROAD SYSTEM MAP FOR GILROY AREA 2. EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMITS 3. CRITICAL SPEEDS AT LEAST 5 MPH GREATER THAN POSTED SPEED LIMIT 4. RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMITS LIST OF APPENDICES A. SPEED SURVEY DATA 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page iii

1 INTRODUCTION City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey This study summarizes the 2012 engineering and traffic survey performed in the City of Gilroy. The study includes a summary of radar speed surveys at 117 locations within the city, as well as collision histories at key locations. This report includes the following: Speed limit and speed zone traffic regulations; Traffic collision history; Speed survey results; and Recommended speed limit changes. This report is an update of the City of Gilroy 2007 Citywide Speed Survey. 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 1

City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey 2 SPEED LIMIT AND SPEED ZONE CALCULATIONS Traffic regulations regarding speed limits and zones are described in the California Department of Transportation s (Caltrans) California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) and the California Vehicle Code (CVC). This section summarizes blanket traffic regulations and speed limit sign and marking procedures. 2.1 Blanket Traffic Regulations Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The statutes contained in the CVC establish or provide means for establishing speed limits by blanket regulations or by prima facie speed limits which are established by local authorities on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. The Gilroy Speed Survey is intended to comply with the statutes contained in the Vehicle Code. Basic Speed Law Section 220 of the CVC describes the Basic Speed Law. It states that No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. Reasonable is defined in Merriam-Webster s Collegiate Dictionary as moderate, fair and not extreme or excessive," while prudent is defined as marked by wisdom or judiciousness and shrewd in the management of practical affairs. The courts have determined that the 85 th percentile speed represents a reasonable or prudent speed. Maximum Speed Limit Section 22349 of the CVC provides that no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour (MPH). An exception to this, as stated in Section 226, is that Caltrans may increase the speed limit to 70 miles per hour (MPH). This increase can only be made after consultation with the California Highway Patrol and on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. Even if the maximum speed is raised, certain vehicles are still not to be driven over 55 MPH per Section 226. These are listed below: Motor trucks or truck tractors having three or more axles or any truck towing another vehicle. Passenger vehicles or buses towing other vehicles. School buses transporting school pupils. Farm labor vehicles transporting passengers. Vehicles transporting explosives. Trailer buses, as defined in Section 636 of the CVC. Speed Law Violations and Prima Facie Speed Limits Section 221 of the CVC states that the speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 222 or established as authorized in [the CVC] is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law. This same 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 2

City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey section also states that the speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 222 or established as authorized in [the CVC] is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law [CVC Section 220] at the time, place and under the conditions then existing. Evidence may include what the CVC terms an Engineering and Traffic Survey, more commonly called a speed study. Section 222 of the CVC establishes prima facie speed limits for local roads and streets. The literal definition of the phrase prima facie is first appearance. It is also defined as first view and before investigation. Prima facie evidence is evidence sufficient to establish fact, or to raise presumption of fact, unless rebutted. Prima facie speed limits are those that are defined in Section 222. These speed limits shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in the CVC and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof. A speed limit of 15 MPH applies at railroad crossings, at uncontrolled highway intersections with obstructed view, and on alleys. A speed limit of MPH applies on any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is established by local authority under procedures described in the CVC. The MPH speed limit also applies in school zones and when passing senior centers. Section 2 of the CVC describes a business district as an area which at least 50 percent of the properties are used for business for a minimum distance of 600 feet on one side or 0 feet on both sides of the highway. Section 515 describes a residence district as an area outside of the business district along a highway which has a minimum of 13 separate dwelling units on one side, or 16 on both sides for a minimum distance of a quarter-mile. CVC Sections 227 and 228 authorize local authorities to establish prima facie speed limits on streets and roads under their jurisdiction, on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. CVC Sections 228.3 and 228.4 authorize local agencies to reduce prima facie speed limits to 20 or 15 MPH on narrow streets (roadway width less than feet), school zones, or senior centers on the basis of engineering and traffic surveys. Speed Traps Section 802(a) of the CVC provides that prima facie speed limits established under Sections 222(b), 224, 227, 228, and 228.3 may not be enforced by radar unless the speed limit has been justified by an engineering and traffic survey (a.k.a. speed survey) within the last five years. Roadways with speed limits not justified by a speed survey are classified by the CVC as speed traps, which are outright prohibited in CVC Section 801. Section 2B.13 of the 2012 CA MUTCD further emphases that that a speed limit sign shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorizing agency based upon a speed survey. 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 3

City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey Local Streets CVC Section 802(a) defines local streets and roads as ones that are functionally classified as local on the California Road System Maps approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Exhibit 1 depicts the current California Road System Maps covering the City of Gilroy. If a local street or roadway is not indicated on the California Road System Maps, CVC Section 802(b) also allows local streets and roads to be defined as those roadways that meet the following four conditions: Primarily provides access to abutting residential property; Roadway width of not more than feet; Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices; and Not more than one traffic lane in each direction. As noted in CVC Section 802(a), roadways meeting either of the above CVC definitions for local streets and roadways are categorically exempt from any of the speed trap provisions within Section 802. This means that the City of Gilroy may enforce speed limits on local streets and roads meeting either definition without first performing an engineering and traffic survey (i.e. speed survey). However, enforcement on local streets would still be based upon the Basic Speed Law (i.e. 85 th percentile). Note: A jurisdiction s functional classification of a local street or roadway has no bearing on whether the roadway actually meets either of the CVC definitions. For example, if there is a discrepancy in function classification between the city s General Plan and the California Road System Maps, the California Road System Maps is the controlling definition. It is therefore important that cities submit their roadway classifications to Caltrans after adoption of city General Plan revisions. 2.2 Speed Limit Signs and Markings Section 219 of the CVC states that all prima facie speed limits established by Caltrans or a local authority shall be posted with the appropriate speed restriction signs for the speed limit to be effective. Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones. Speed limit pavement markings with appropriate figures may be used to supplement speed limit signs. Such markings are not common in in Gilroy. Where speed limits vary by more than 10 MPH along contiguous segments of a roadway, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice, a Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign should be used. An example of such a situation is northbound Monterey Road in advance of Tenth Street, where the current speed limit changes from 50 MPH south of Tenth Street to MPH north of Tenth Street. Such a sign is currently in place just south of Tenth Street. 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 4

3 TRAFFIC COLLISION HISTORY City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey Recent collision histories were considered to determine appropriate speed limits. 3.1 Traffic Collision Data Collision reports were reviewed for the 5-year period between January 2008 and December 2012 by the City of Gilroy Police Department. This information is summarized in Table 1. The summary table includes the total collisions within each street study segment, plus collisions where speed was a primary collision factor. Both total and non-intersection collisions are summarized in this table. No additional analysis was performed on the information. Table 1: Collision Data No. Street From To Total Collisions Mid-Block Collisions Pedestrian/ Bicycle Collisions Speed Related Collisions 1 Arroyo Circle Leavesley Road Camino Arroyo 31 16 0 9 2 Arroyo Circle Camino Arroyo Camino Arroyo 29 23 0 11 3 Bolsa Road HWY 101 City Limits 2 1 0 2 4 Calle del Rey Longmeadow Drive Mantelli Drive 3 2 0 1 5 Cameron Boulevard HWY 152 (East) Venture Way N/A 6 Camino Arroyo Arroyo Circle End 37 29 0 11 7 Camino Arroyo Arroyo Circle HWY 152 (East) 1 0 0 0 8 Camino Arroyo HWY 152 (East) Holloway Road 47 19 2 11 9 Camino Arroyo Holloway Road Venture Way N/A 10 Carmel Street First Street Third Street 8 4 1 1 11 Carmel Street Third Street Sixth Street 11 4 0 3 12 Chestnut Street Murray Avenue End 5 2 0 1 13 Chestnut Street End Old Gilroy Street 8 2 1 2 14 Chestnut Street Old Gilroy Street Tenth Street 36 10 0 12 15 Chestnut Street Tenth Street Luchessa Avenue 16 11 0 6 16 Church Street End Mantelli Drive 15 8 3 4 17 Church Street Mantelli Drive Welburn Avenue 21 4 1 5 18 Church Street Welburn Avenue First Street 7 2 10 19 Church Street First Street Third Street 20 Church Street Third Street Sixth Street 43 11 4 6 21 Church Street Sixth Street Tenth Street 43 8 1 3 22 Church Street Tenth Street Luchessa Avenue 12 5 1 4 23 Club Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard Grenache Way 8 1 0 4 24 Day Road Santa Teresa Boulevard Cougar Court N/A Eighth Street Miller Avenue Princevalle Street 5 3 1 1 26 Eighth Street Princevalle Street Monterey Street 27 11 2 4 27 Farman Frontage Road 7 Monterey Road City Limits 0 0 0 0 28 Farrell Avenue Wren Avenue Monterey Road 13 5 2 5 29 Forest Street Yamane Drive Leavesley Road 0 0 0 0 Forest Street I.O.O.F. Avenue Old Gilroy Street 16 6 3 2 31 Fourth Street Miller Avenue Carmel Street 5 0 0 1 32 Fourth Street Carmel Street Church Street 7 1 1 2 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 6

Table 1: Collision Data (Continued) City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey No. Street From To Total Collisions Mid-Block Collisions Pedestrian/ Bicycle Collisions Speed Related Collisions 33 Fourth Street Church Street Monterey Street 5 1 1 3 34 Hirasaki Avenue End Mantelli Drive 6 1 1 2 Holloway Road End Silacci Way 0 0 0 0 36 I.O.O.F. Avenue Monterey Street Murray Avenue 8 2 0 3 37 Kern Avenue City Limits Mantelli Drive 5 2 1 3 38 Kern Avenue Mantelli Drive Welburn Avenue 12 4 4 5 39 Kern Avenue Welburn Avenue First Street 8 1 3 1 Kishimura Street Forest Street Murray Avenue 1 0 0 0 41 Las Animas Avenue Church Street Monterey Road 7 1 0 1 42 Las Animas Avenue Monterey Road Murray Avenue 2 0 1 0 43 Leavesley Road San Ysidro Avenue City Limits 41 18 1 7 44 Longmeadow Drive Rancho Hills Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard 1 0 1 0 45 Longmeadow Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard Hirasaki Avenue 18 6 0 8 46 Luchessa Avenue Cimino Street Thomas Road N/A 47 Luchessa Avenue Thomas Road Monterey Road 14 4 1 4 48 Luchessa Avenue Monterey Road Rossi Lane 5 1 0 3 49 Mantelli Drive End Country Drive 0 0 0 0 50 Mantelli Drive Country Drive Rancho Hills Drive 0 0 0 0 51 Mantelli Drive Rancho Hills Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard 12 1 1 2 52 Mantelli Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard Kern Avenue 3 2 1 1 53 Mantelli Drive Kern Avenue Wren Avenue 11 1 3 3 54 Mantelli Drive Wren Avenue Church Street 1 1 0 1 55 Miller Avenue First Street Third Street 56 Miller Avenue Third Street Sixth Street 24 7 0 4 57 Miller Avenue Sixth Street Eighth Street 58 Miller Avenue Eighth Street Uvas Park Drive 2 0 1 0 59 Miller Avenue Uvas Park Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard 14 8 2 5 60 Miller Avenue Santa Teresa Boulevard San Justo Road 61 Miller Avenue San Justo Road Thomas Road 22 4 0 6 62 Monterey Road (101/B) City Limits Cohansey Avenue 63 Monterey Road (101/B) Cohansey Avenue Las Animas Avenue 27 8 0 7 64 Monterey Road (101/B) Las Animas Avenue Leavesley Road 48 9 1 15 65 Monterey Street (101/B) First Street Third Street 49 23 1 11 66 Monterey Street (101/B) Third Street Sixth Street 22 12 2 5 67 Monterey Street (101/B) Sixth Street Tenth Street 31 10 1 8 68 Monterey Road (101/B) Tenth Street Luchessa Avenue 6 6 0 1 69 Monterey Road (101/B) Luchessa Avenue Farman Frontage Road 7 4 0 0 70 Murray Avenue Las Animas Avenue Leavesley Road 9 3 1 1 71 Murray Avenue Leavesley Road I.O.O.F. Avenue 48 12 4 16 72 Murray Avenue I.O.O.F. Avenue Chestnut Street 0 0 0 0 73 No Name Uno Avenue City Limits Las Animas Avenue 2 0 1 1 74 Old Gilroy Street Monterey Street Eighth Street 10 6 1 1 75 Princevalle Street Sixth Street Tenth Street 22 6 3 11 76 Princevalle Street Tenth Street Luchessa Avenue 5 2 0 1 77 Rancho Hills Drive End Longmeadow Drive 0 0 0 0 78 Rancho Hills Drive Longmeadow Drive Mantelli Drive 2 2 0 1 79 Rossi Lane Luchessa Avenue Southside Drive 0 0 0 0 80 San Ysidro Avenue Las Animas Avenue Leavesley Road 11 9 1 0 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 7

Table 1: Collision Data (Continued) City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey No. Street From To Total Collisions Mid-Block Collisions Pedestrian/ Bicycle Collisions Speed Related Collisions 81 Santa Teresa Boulevard Day Road Mantelli Drive 18 7 0 6 82 Santa Teresa Boulevard Mantelli Drive First Street 23 6 2 8 83 Seventh Street Princevalle Street Monterey Street 15 4 1 2 84 Silacci Way HWY 152 (East) End 1 0 0 1 85 Sixth Street Wren Avenue Miller Avenue 3 1 0 0 86 Sixth Street Miller Avenue Church Street 9 4 2 2 87 Sixth Street Church Street Monterey Street 12 3 0 2 88 Sixth Street Monterey Street Rogers Lane 7 2 1 2 89 Sixth Street Rogers Lane Arroyo Circle 4 2 0 1 90 Southside Drive Obata Way Rossi Lane 1 1 0 0 91 Southside Drive Rossi Lane End 0 0 0 0 92 93 Sunrise Drive Sunrise Drive Rancho Hills Drive Tapestry Drive / Cooper Place Tapestry Drive / Cooper Place Santa Teresa Boulevard 0 0 0 94 Tenth Street Uvas Park Drive Princevalle Street 12 5 1 2 95 Tenth Street Princevalle Street Church Street 6 2 0 2 96 Tenth Street Church Street SB HWY 101 63 21 0 31 97 Third Street Santa Teresa Boulevard Westwood Drive 3 0 0 3 98 Third Street Westwood Drive Wren Avenue 10 4 1 1 99 Third Street Wren Avenue Miller Avenue 9 2 0 2 100 Third Street Miller Avenue Church Street 3 0 1 1 101 Third Street Church Street Monterey Street 5 1 0 0 102 Thomas Road Luchessa Avenue Santa Teresa Boulevard 11 3 0 4 103 Uvas Park Drive Wren Avenue Tenth Street 4 0 0 2 104 Wayland Lane Welburn Avenue First Street 18 6 3 5 105 Welburn Avenue Mantelli Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard 0 0 0 0 106 Welburn Avenue Santa Teresa Boulevard Kern Avenue 2 1 0 0 107 Welburn Avenue Kern Avenue Wren Avenue 4 2 0 1 108 Welburn Avenue Wren Avenue Church Street 109 Welburn Avenue Church Street Monterey Street 29 9 2 6 110 Westwood Drive Welburn Avenue First Street 5 4 3 111 Westwood Drive First Street Third Street 12 9 2 4 112 Wren Avenue End Tatum Avenue 113 Wren Avenue Tatum Avenue Mantelli Drive 7 4 1 1 114 Wren Avenue Mantelli Drive Welburn Avenue 6 4 1 2 115 Wren Avenue Welburn Avenue First Street 33 7 2 11 116 Wren Avenue First Street Third Street 6 3 1 0 117 Wren Avenue Third Street Uvas Park Drive 5 0 0 1 Data within table based on traffic collision data from police reports for the period between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2012. Source: City of Gilroy Police Department 3 2 0 1 0 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 8

4 SPEED SURVEY RESULTS City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey This section of the report summarizes the results of the radar speed surveys. The median speed (50 th percentile) and critical speed (85 th percentile speeds) are reported. 4.1 Field Speed Surveys The measurement of prevailing speeds was done by using a radar speed gun. The following general procedures were followed for the measurements: Locations were selected where prevailing speeds were representative of the entire speed zone. Areas near traffic control devices and horizontal and vertical curves were avoided. Speed measurements were taken during off-peak hours on weekdays. If there was difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements were taken during other periods with free-flowing traffic. Weather was fair and the surveyor and radar equipment were as inconspicuous as possible. Angle to roadway centerline was no greater than 15 degrees in both directions. The desired minimum survey sample was 100 vehicles. Short speed zones of less than one-half mile were avoided where possible. Speed zone changes were coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development. Because Gilroy is an urban area, speed zone changes in 5 MPH increments were allowed. 4.2 Speed Survey Results Table 2 summarizes the existing speed limits, median (50 th percentile) speeds and critical (85 th percentile) speeds for all studied street segments. The median speed is the middle value of speeds ranked in order of magnitude. The critical, or 85 th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of people surveyed drive, and is the primary basis for the establishment of a speed limit on a roadway. The field speed survey sheets are provided in Appendix A. Exhibit 2 indicates the existing posted speed limits and Exhibit 3 the roadways with critical speeds which exceed the posted speed limit by at least 5 miles per hour. 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 9

Table 2: Speed Survey Data City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey No. Street From To Direction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 31 32 Posted Speed Limit (mph) Median Speed (mph) Critical Speed (mph) 10 mph Pace Speed % Within Pace Proposed Speed Limit (mph) Arroyo Circle Leavesley Road Camino Arroyo 31 37 27-36 67 SB 28 34-34 73 Arroyo Circle Camino Arroyo Camino Arroyo 34 37 29-38 85 SB 39 31-75 Bolsa Road HWY 101 City Limits 42 46 37-46 67 45 SB 41 47 38-47 69 Calle del Rey Longmeadow Drive Mantelli Drive 31 36 28-37 73 SB 32 36 27-36 73 Cameron Boulevard HWY 152 (East) Venture Way 28 31 22-31 87 N/A 1 SB 21 16-83 Camino Arroyo Arroyo Circle End 21 17-26 71 SB 24 28 19-28 73 Camino Arroyo Arroyo Circle HWY 152 (East) 33 38 28-37 69 SB 32 36 28-37 77 Camino Arroyo HWY 152 (East) Holloway Road 31 36 27-36 85 SB 32 36 28-37 75 Camino Arroyo Holloway Road Venture Way 33 39 32-41 54 N/A 1,3 SB 32 27-36 73 Carmel Street First Street Third Street 28 31 23-32 81 SB 27 31 23-32 81 Carmel Street Third Street Sixth Street 28 34 24-33 63 SB 28 31 24-33 79 Chestnut Street Murray Avenue End 22 17-26 81 WB 21 18-27 88 Chestnut Street End Old Gilroy Street 26-75 SB 29 24-33 69 Chestnut Street Old Gilroy Street Tenth Street 33 37 28-37 77 SB 39 31-85 Chestnut Street Tenth Street Luchessa Avenue 36 42 31-69 SB 37 42 34-43 65 Church Street End Mantelli Drive 34-34 83 SB 28 32 22-31 77 Church Street Mantelli Drive Welburn Avenue 26-81 SB 33 39 28-37 75 Church Street Welburn Avenue First Street 39-39 77 SB 39 31-87 Church Street First Street Third Street 34-34 81 SB 34 26-85 Church Street Third Street Sixth Street 33 27-36 83 SB 31 27-36 81 Church Street Sixth Street Tenth Street 31 27-36 79 SB 33 37 28-37 85 Church Street Tenth Street Luchessa Avenue 32 36 28-37 77 SB 32 37 28-37 81 Club Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard Grenache Way 28 33 24-33 77 WB 34-34 69 Day Road Santa Teresa Boulevard Cougar Court 38 44 33-42 62 WB 38 44 34-43 65 Eighth Street Miller Avenue Princevalle Street 29-34 65 WB 27 32 23-32 79 Eighth Street Princevalle Street Monterey Street 22 29 17-26 69 WB 27 31 22-31 58 Farman Frontage Road 7 Monterey Road City Limits 31 26-83 SB 31 37 27-36 65 Farrell Avenue Wren Avenue Monterey Road 31 37 26-73 WB 32 36 26-81 Forest Street Yamane Drive Leavesley Road 32 38 28-37 63 SB -34 63 Forest Street I.O.O.F. Avenue Old Gilroy Street 32 37 28-37 77 SB 31 36 28-37 81 Fourth Street Miller Avenue Carmel Street 29 34 24-33 67 WB 26 31 22-31 77 Fourth Street Carmel Street Church Street 24 28 20-29 75 WB 28 21-81 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 10

Table 2: Speed Survey Data (Continued) City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey No. Street From To Direction Posted Speed Limit (mph) Median Speed (mph) Critical Speed (mph) 10 mph Pace Speed % Within Pace Proposed Speed Limit (mph) 33 Fourth Street Church Street Monterey Street 22 26 17-26 67 WB 20 15-24 75 34 Hirasaki Avenue End Mantelli Drive 33 37 28-37 77 SB 32 37-39 69 Holloway Road End Silacci Way 31 37 28-37 62 WB 32 39 28-37 63 36 I.O.O.F. Avenue Monterey Street Murray Avenue 23 26 19-28 90 WB 20 17-26 77 37 Kern Avenue City Limits Mantelli Drive 31 26-78 SB 31 36 27-36 77 38 Kern Avenue Mantelli Drive Welburn Avenue 29 32 24-33 85 SB 28 33-34 85 39 Kern Avenue Welburn Avenue First Street 31 36 28-37 72 SB 31 36 26-71 Kishimura Street Forest Street Murray Avenue 23 28 22-31 60 WB 26 31 21-63 41 Las Animas Avenue Church Street Monterey Road 28 22-31 71 WB 28 20-29 67 42 Las Animas Avenue Monterey Road Murray Avenue 38 44-44 58 WB 38 44-44 60 43 Leavesley Road San Ysidro Avenue City Limits 29-34 63 WB 29 36 24-33 67 44 Longmeadow Drive Rancho Hills Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard 32 37 26-69 WB 32 36 26-75 45 Longmeadow Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard Hirasaki Avenue 26 29 22-31 90 WB 24 27 19-28 85 46 Luchessa Avenue Cimino Street Thomas Road 38 43 33-42 69 N/A 1 WB 36 39 31-79 47 Luchessa Avenue Thomas Road Monterey Road 41 45 37-46 83 WB 41 44-44 79 48 Luchessa Avenue Monterey Road Rossi Lane 38 45 34-43 60 WB 38 41 32-41 71 49 Mantelli Drive End Country Drive 36 32-41 75 WB 38 41 33-42 73 50 Mantelli Drive Country Drive Rancho Hills Drive 37 42 33-42 63 WB 31-63 51 Mantelli Drive Rancho Hills Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard 36 29-38 75 WB 39 28-37 73 52 Mantelli Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard Kern Avenue 38 31-73 WB 34 37 29-38 83 53 Mantelli Drive Kern Avenue Wren Avenue 38 41 33-42 79 WB 34 38 31-79 54 Mantelli Drive Wren Avenue Church Street 31-77 WB 36 41-39 75 55 Miller Avenue First Street Third Street 33 26-90 SB 33 26-87 56 Miller Avenue Third Street Sixth Street 33-34 90 SB 31 36 28-37 88 57 Miller Avenue Sixth Street Eighth Street 31 26-69 SB 31 37 26-71 58 Miller Avenue Eighth Street Uvas Park Drive 29 32 24-33 81 WB 29 33-34 77 59 Miller Avenue Uvas Park Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard 42 47 38-47 67 SB 41 44-44 79 60 Miller Avenue Santa Teresa Boulevard San Justo Road / 33 28-37 56 SB/WB 34 42 27-36 52 61 Miller Avenue San Justo Road Thomas Road 34 39 29-38 75 SB 34 38-39 79 62 Monterey Road (101/B) City Limits Cohansey Avenue 50 53 57 46-55 71 50 SB 51 56 46-55 60 63 Monterey Road (101/B) Cohansey Avenue Las Animas Avenue 46 52 38-47 54 50/45 2 SB 46 51 38-47 63 45 64 Monterey Road (101/B) Las Animas Avenue Leavesley Road 45 47 53 39-48 62 45 SB 46 51 43-52 75 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 11

Table 2: Speed Survey Data (Continued) City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey No. Street From To Direction Posted Speed Limit (mph) Median Speed (mph) Critical Speed (mph) 10 mph Pace Speed 65 Monterey Street (101/B) First Street Third Street 29 34 24-33 77 SB 29 34 26-81 66 Monterey Street (101/B) Third Street Sixth Street 19 23 15-24 81 SB 19 22 14-23 88 67 Monterey Street (101/B) Sixth Street Tenth Street 24 28 18-27 65 SB 27 29 22-31 79 68 Monterey Road (101/B) Tenth Street Luchessa Avenue 50 42 47 37-46 62 SB 44 48-49 56 69 Monterey Road (101/B) Luchessa Avenue Farman Frontage Road 50 41 48-44 56 SB 43 50 42-51 58 70 Murray Avenue Las Animas Avenue Leavesley Road 42 31-67 SB 37 43 34-43 63 71 Murray Avenue Leavesley Road I.O.O.F. Avenue 34 39 29-38 69 SB 38 28-37 71 72 Murray Avenue I.O.O.F. Avenue Chestnut Street 31 36 27-36 62 SB 28 33-34 79 73 No Name Uno Avenue City Limits Las Animas Avenue 41 46 36-45 63 SB 43 48-49 67 74 Old Gilroy Street Monterey Street Eighth Street 24 27 19-28 92 WB 23 27 19-28 88 75 Princevalle Street Sixth Street Tenth Street 31 26-75 SB 34-34 73 76 Princevalle Street Tenth Street Luchessa Avenue 31 26-81 SB 32 36 29-38 87 77 Rancho Hills Drive End Longmeadow Drive 33 37 29-38 75 SB 31 28-37 67 78 Rancho Hills Drive Longmeadow Drive Mantelli Drive 31 34 26-79 SB 27-36 75 79 Rossi Lane Luchessa Avenue Southside Drive 38 44-44 56 SB 36 41 32-41 67 80 San Ysidro Avenue Las Animas Avenue Leavesley Road 41 47-44 63 SB 38 44-44 75 81 Santa Teresa Boulevard Day Road Mantelli Drive 45 44 49 38-47 60 SB 42 47 38-47 69 82 Santa Teresa Boulevard Mantelli Drive First Street 45 44 36-45 71 SB 41 45 36-45 67 83 Seventh Street Princevalle Street Monterey Street 28 19-28 83 WB 24 28 19-28 81 84 Silacci Way HWY 152 (East) End 36 26-54 SB 28 34-34 48 85 Sixth Street Wren Avenue Miller Avenue 32 36 28-37 83 WB 34-34 88 86 Sixth Street Miller Avenue Church Street 32 36-34 81 WB 32 36 26-81 87 Sixth Street Church Street Monterey Street 22 17-26 90 WB 22 26 19-28 92 88 Sixth Street Monterey Street Rogers Lane 23 19-28 96 WB 24 27 19-28 96 89 Sixth Street Rogers Lane Camino Arroyo 34 37 28-37 85 WB 37-39 85 90 Southside Drive Obata Way Rossi Lane 31 19-28 67 WB 31 19-28 69 91 Southside Drive Rossi Lane End 29 37-34 56 WB 31 37 29-38 50 92 Sunrise Drive Rancho Hills Drive Tapestry Drive / 29 24-33 67 Cooper Place WB 31 27-36 65 93 Sunrise Drive Tapestry Drive / 29-38 62 Santa Teresa Boulevard Cooper Place WB 29-38 71 94 Tenth Street Uvas Park Drive Princevalle Street -39 75 WB 32 37 28-37 73 95 Tenth Street Princevalle Street Church Street 34 38-39 87 WB 33 37 28-37 81 96 Tenth Street Church Street SB HWY 101 31 36 27-36 65 WB 33 38 28-37 79 % Within Pace Proposed Speed Limit (mph) 45 45 45 45 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 12

Table 2: Speed Survey Data (Continued) City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey No. Street From To Direction Posted Speed Limit (mph) Median Speed (mph) Critical Speed (mph) 10 mph Pace Speed % Within Pace Proposed Speed Limit (mph) 97 Third Street Santa Teresa Boulevard Westwood Drive 27 23-32 81 WB 28 31 22-31 77 98 Third Street Westwood Drive Wren Avenue 34 39 31-65 WB 34 37 31-77 99 Third Street Wren Avenue Miller Avenue 28 31 22-31 73 WB 28 32 24-33 79 100 Third Street Miller Avenue Church Street 28 31-34 79 WB 27 22-31 81 101 Third Street Church Street Monterey Street 22 18-27 83 WB 22 17-26 87 102 Thomas Road Luchessa Avenue Santa Teresa Boulevard 41 45 36-45 73 SB 41 46-44 63 103 Uvas Park Drive Wren Avenue Tenth Street 37 41 34-43 79 WB 38 43 33-42 75 104 Wayland Lane Welburn Avenue First Street 31 27-36 75 SB 32 36 27-36 88 105 Welburn Avenue Mantelli Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard / 36 26-67 SB/WB 28 34-34 71 106 Welburn Avenue Santa Teresa Boulevard Kern Avenue 41 32-41 62 WB 34 29-38 63 107 Welburn Avenue Kern Avenue Wren Avenue 34 38 29-38 81 WB 32 36 28-37 79 108 Welburn Avenue Wren Avenue Church Street 27 32 23-32 75 WB 27 31 23-32 87 109 Welburn Avenue Church Street Monterey Street 26 28 22-31 87 WB 19-28 69 110 Westwood Drive Welburn Avenue First Street 32 37 29-38 73 SB 31 27-36 81 111 Westwood Drive First Street Third Street 28 33-34 88 SB 29 33-34 79 112 Wren Avenue End Tatum Avenue -39 63 SB 29-38 63 113 Wren Avenue Tatum Avenue Mantelli Drive 37 41 32-41 85 SB 39 31-73 114 Wren Avenue Mantelli Drive Welburn Avenue 36 41 32-41 77 SB 33 37 29-38 83 115 Wren Avenue Welburn Avenue First Street 32 27-36 83 SB 31 36 27-36 79 116 Wren Avenue First Street Third Street 32 26-81 SB 31 26-85 117 Wren Avenue Third Street Uvas Park Drive 33 38 29-38 81 SB 33-42 73 Notes: 1. N/A = No speed limit sign posted on street segment. 2. Monterey Road (segment 63) has two different posted speeds. See Section 5.2 for more information. 3. Traffic along Camino Arroyo (segment 9) resulted in less than the standard 100 observations due to lack of existing traffic. 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 13

5 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT CHANGES City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey This section summarizes the recommended speed limits on city street segments, including locations where speed limits are recommended to be raised, lowered, newly established, or retained at existing levels. 5.1 Establishing Speed Limits The CVC and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) describe the procedure for establishing speed limits. Section 210 of the CVC states that The Department of Transportation shall revise the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices [CA MUTCD], as it read on January 1, 2012, to require the [California] Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. Accordingly, Section 2B.13 of the 2012 CA MUTCD states that When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85 th -percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, based upon the results of a vehicle speed survey. Note that this procedure can, in certain instances, result in speed limits of 1 or 2 MPH higher than the surveyed critical speed. The 85 th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the vehicles are driven. The 85 th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed. Speed limits higher than the critical speed are not generally considered reasonable and safe while limits below the critical speed do not facilitate the orderly movement of traffic. Speed limits established on this basis conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and safe, and are not dependent on the judgement of one or a few individuals. There are three categories of speed adjustments allowed by the CA MUTCD 1) business district; 2) residential density; and 3) pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Each category has its own factors that must be considered prior to application; each is described in Subsections 5.1.1 through 5.1.3, below. There is also a one-time exception that allows for the 85 th percentile speed (i.e. critical speed) to be rounded down instead of up this exception is described in Subsection 5.1.4. 5.1.1 Business District As previously noted in Section 2.1 of this document, speed limits within business districts are defined in the CVC as MPH. Section 2 of the CVC describes a business district as an area which at least 50 percent of the properties are used for business for a minimum distance of 600 feet on one side or 0 feet on both sides of the highway. 5.1.2 Residential Density Reduction As described within the CA MUTCD, a speed reduction of 5 MPH can be applied to the nearest 5 MPH increment to the critical speed if either of the following building densities currently exists along a roadway: 1. The density of separate dwelling houses or business structures contiguous along one side of a roadway is at least 13 houses or structures per 0. miles; or 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 16

City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey 2. The density of separate dwelling houses or business structures contiguous along both sides of a roadway is at least 16 houses or structures per 0. miles. 5.1.3 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety Reduction The CA MUTCD states that pedestrian and bicyclist safety can also be used as justification for keeping a speed limit low. The CA MUTCD does not provide specific criteria for use in this justification; however, in the spirit of the other guidance and statutes in the CA MUTCD and CVC, it is recommended that reductions be minimized where possible and that they be limited to roadways with moderate to heavy pedestrian and bicycle activity, such as near schools, parks, and other public gathering areas, as well as along obvious and established routes to schools. The factors which can enter into this decision process include the following: Most recent two-year accident record (minimum) Roadway design speed Safe stopping sight distance Superelevation Shoulder conditions Profile conditions Intersection spacing and offsets Driveway characteristics Pedestrian traffic in roadway without sidewalks The above factors conform to the conditions of CVC Section 627, Engineering and Traffic Survey, which states that the following factors shall be included for consideration: Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements Accident records Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Pedestrian and bicyclist safety The CA MUTCD also notes the following additional factors that may be considered when establishing or re-evaluating a speed limit: Roadway alignment Pace speed (i.e. the 10 MPH interval in which the highest percentage of vehicle speeds are situated) Roadside development and environment Parking practices and pedestrian activity 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 17

City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey 5.1.4 Exception for Adjustment of Critical Speed The CVC contains an exception to the CA MUTCD procedure to establish a speed limit from the critical speed (i.e. 85 th percentile speed). Section 210(b) 1 of the CVC allows for the speed limit of a roadway to be rounded down to the nearest 5 MPH increment below the critical speed, as long as the speed limit would have otherwise been rounded up to the 5 MPH increment above the critical speed. If this adjustment is applied to the critical speed, no additional adjustments can be made. This means that if this exception is applied, none of the other adjustments described under Subsections 5.1.1 through 5.1.3 could be applied, regardless of whether or not the criteria for those other adjustments are met. For example, if the critical speed was found to be 33 MPH, instead of rounding up to MPH (the nearest 5 MPH increment), the speed limit could be rounded down to MPH using the exception, but no further reductions could be taken. Alternatively, if the critical speed was found to be 32 MPH, the nearest 5 MPH increment would be MPH a speed lower than the critical speed and thus the exception would not apply but the other adjustments described in Subsections 5.1.1 through 5.1.3 could be applied if their criteria are met. 5.2 Existing Speed Limits to Remain The existing speed limits on the following 97 street segments are recommended to be retained. For many of these segments, the observed critical speeds exceed the existing speed limits by 5 MPH or more. However, a review of other factors besides the critical speed indicates that the existing speed limits are appropriate. These factors are included as an explanation for not raising the speed limit. The existing speed limits are indicated in parentheses next to each segment. The locations of these street segments are also depicted graphically in Exhibit 4. 1. Arroyo Circle Leavesley Road to Camino Arroyo ( MPH) The critical speed is between 34 to 37 MPH, which is 4 to 7 MPH above the existing speed limit; this would normally warrant a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as this location is eligible for the CVC 210(b) rounding down exception. 2. Arroyo Circle Camino Arroyo to Camino Arroyo ( MPH) 4. Calle Del Rey Longmeadow Drive to Mantelli Drive ( MPH) The critical speed is 36 MPH, which is 11 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides and fronts along both an elementary school and park that generate both pedestrian and bicycle traffic. 1 Note: This section is erroneously cited as Section 210(f) in the 2012 CA MUTCD, page 142. 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 18

7. Camino Arroyo Arroyo Circle to Hwy 152 (East) ( MPH) 8. Camino Arroyo Hwy 152 (East) to Holloway Road ( MPH) 12. Chestnut Street Murray Avenue to End ( MPH) City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey 13. Chestnut Street End to Old Gilroy Street ( MPH) The critical speed is MPH, 5 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. Instead, it is recommended that the speed limit remain at MPH, as this is a residential collector street with residences along both sides. 14. Chestnut Street Old Gilroy Street to Tenth Street ( MPH) 15. Chestnut Street Tenth Street to Luchessa Avenue ( MPH) 16. Church Street End to Mantelli Drive ( MPH) 17. Church Street Mantelli Drive to Welburn Avenue ( MPH) The critical speed is between and 39 MPH, 5 to 9 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides. 18. Church Street Welburn Avenue to First Street ( MPH) The critical speed is 39 MPH, which is 9 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences and businesses on both sides, fronts along a school that generates both pedestrian and bicycle traffic, and has a relatively high incidence of collisions. 19. Church Street First Street to Third Street ( MPH) The critical speed is 34 MPH, 4 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences and a few businesses on both sides. 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 20

City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey 20. Church Street Third Street to Sixth Street ( MPH) The critical speed is between 33 and MPH, which is between 3 and 5 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides. 21. Church Street Sixth Street to Tenth Street ( MPH) The critical speed is between and 37 MPH, which is between 5 and 7 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides. 22. Church Street Tenth Street to Luchessa Avenue ( MPH) The critical speed is between 36 and 37 MPH, which is between 6 and 7 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides. 23. Club Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard to Grenache Way ( MPH) The critical speed is between 33 to 34 MPH, which is 3 to 4 MPH above the existing speed limit; this would normally warrant a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as this location is eligible for the CVC 210(b) rounding down exception. 24. Day Road Santa Teresa Boulevard to Cougar Court ( MPH) The critical speed is 44 MPH, which is 4 MPH above the existing speed limit; this would normally warrant a speed limit of 45 MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as this location is eligible for the CVC 210(b) rounding down exception.. Eighth Street Miller Avenue to Princevalle Street ( MPH) The critical speed is between 32 and MPH, which is between 7 and 10 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides. 26. Eighth Street Princevalle Street to Monterey Street ( MPH) The critical speed is between 29 and 31 MPH, which is between 4 and 6 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides. 29. Forest Street Yamane Drive to Leavesley Road ( MPH) 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 21

City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey. Forest Street I.O.O.F. Avenue to Old Gilroy Street ( MPH) The critical speed is between 36 and 37 MPH, which is between 6 and 7 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides. 31. Fourth Street Miller Street to Carmel Street ( MPH) 32. Fourth Street Carmel Street to Church Street ( MPH) 33. Fourth Street Church Street to Monterey Street ( MPH) 34. Hirasaki Avenue End to Mantelli Drive ( MPH) The critical speed is 37 MPH, which is 7 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides and the roadway fronts a park generating pedestrian traffic.. Holloway Road End to Silacci Way ( MPH) 36. I.O.O.F. Avenue Monterey Street to Murray Avenue ( MPH) 37. Kern Avenue City Limits to Mantelli Drive ( MPH) 39. Kern Avenue Welburn Avenue to First Street ( MPH). Kishimura Street Forrest Street to Murray Avenue ( MPH) 43. Leavesley Road San Ysidro Avenue to City Limits ( MPH) 44. Longmeadow Drive Rancho Hills Drive to Santa Teresa Boulevard ( MPH) 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 22

City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey 47. Luchessa Avenue Thomas Road to Monterey Road ( MPH) The critical speed is 44 to 45 MPH, which is 4 to 5 MPH above the existing speed limit; this would normally warrant a speed limit of 45 MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as this location is eligible for the CVC 210(b) rounding down exception. 48. Luchessa Avenue Monterey Road to Rossi Lane ( MPH) 49. Mantelli Drive End to Country Drive ( MPH) The critical speed is between and 41 MPH, which is 5 to 6 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as this roadway lacks sidewalks, thus forcing pedestrians to walk along the roadway shoulder. 50. Manteli Drive County Drive to Rancho Hills Drive ( MPH) The critical speed is between and 42 MPH, which is 5 to 7 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as this roadway lacks sidewalks, thus forcing pedestrians to walk along the roadway shoulder. 51. Mantelli Drive Rancho Hills Drive to Santa Teresa Boulevard ( MPH) The critical speed is between 39 and MPH, which is 4 to 5 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides. 52. Mantelli Drive Santa Teresa Boulevard to Kern Avenue ( MPH) 53. Mantelli Drive Kern Avenue to Wren Avenue ( MPH) The critical speed is between 38 and 41 MPH, which is 3 to 6 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides. 54. Mantelli Drive Wren Avenue to Church Street ( MPH) The critical speed is between and 41 MPH, which is 5 to 6 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is a residential collector street with residences on both sides. 55. Miller Avenue First Street to Third Street ( MPH) 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 23

56. Miller Avenue Third Street to Sixth Street ( MPH) 57. Miller Avenue Sixth Street to Eighth Street ( MPH) City of Gilroy 2012 Speed Survey 59. Miller Avenue Uvas Park Drive to Santa Teresa Boulevard ( MPH) The critical speed is between 44 and 47 MPH, which is 9 to 12 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of 45 MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, due to narrow shoulders and the fact that the roadway bisects a park generating pedestrian and bicycle traffic. 61. Miller Avenue San Justo Road to Thomas Road ( MPH) The critical speed is between 38 and 39 MPH, which is 13 to 14 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at MPH, as the roadway is narrow with no shoulders, no sidewalk in the southbound direction, and a drop in elevation along the southbound street frontage. 62. Monterey Road City Limits to Cohansey Avenue (50 MPH) The critical speed is between 56 and 57 MPH, which is 6 to 7 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of 55 MPH. However, the speed limit is recommended to remain at 50 MPH for consistency with the speed limit established by Santa Clara County in the unincorporated area immediately north of the City of Gilroy. 63. Monterey Road Cohansey Avenue to Las Animas Avenue (50/45 MPH) (Note: The speed limit on this segment is 50 MPH between Cohansey and Farrell Avenues and 45 MPH between Farrell and Las Animas Avenues. However, in light of recent residential developments being constructed and proposed between Farrell and Cohansey Avenues, this segment has been reconfigured to include both pieces.) The critical speed is between 51 and 52 MPH, which is between 1 and 7 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of 50 MPH. However, it is recommended that the speed limit be lowered to 45 MPH over the entire segment, as the roadway is a transition between the less urbanized unincorporated areas to the north and the more urbanized areas and increased driveway/cross-street frequency within the City. 64. Monterey Road Las Animas Avenue to Leavesley Road (45 MPH) The critical speed is between 51 and 53 MPH, which is between 6 and 8 MPH above the existing speed limit. This would normally require a speed limit of 50 MPH. However, it is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 MPH, due to the number and frequency of driveways along this roadway, as well as the relatively high incidence of collisions. 8712 Report3-FINAL.doc Page 24