Economy. 38% of GDP in 1970; 33% of GDP in 1998 Most significant decline in Manufacturing 47% to 29%

Similar documents
Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

Urban Land Use/Transport Policy, Metro and Its Impacts in Shanghai

Mobility in Cities Database 2015

Structure. Transport and Sustainability. Lessons from Past. The Way Forward

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Back to the Future? Land Use, Mobility & Accessibility in Metropolitan China Day 23 C. Zegras. Contents

2.1 Outline of Person Trip Survey

Moscow International Transport Experts Council. Laurence A. Bannerman

Dr. K. Gunasekaran Associate Professor Division of Transportation Engineering Anna University Chennai

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito

Application of EMME3 and Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) for Estimation of Zonal Time Varying Population Density Distribution in

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

Development of Alternative Fuel for Public Transport in Ho Chi Minh City

Key Outcomes. The key outcomes of the preliminary study:

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Japanese Facts on Car Demand & others

DAVID DAVID BURNS BURNS RAILROAD RAILROAD INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERING CONSULTANT CONSULTAN CHICAGO CHICAGO, USA, USA

Ministry of Environment and Forests. Ministry of Communication

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Land Transport Demand Analysis and Energy Saving Potentials in Thailand

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

Sustainable Transport and Restraining CO 2 emissions in Latin America- good news from a forgotten continent

RETROFIT VEHICLES IN MEXICO CITY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND PASSENGER TRANSPORT RED

Decarbonization of the Transport Sector and Urban Form

Shared Transport experience from the UK

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Transport Sector Performance Indicators: Sri Lanka Existing Situation

The main figures of public transport in Catalonia

Whither the Dashing Commuter?

Outline. Research Questions. Electric Scooters in Viet Nam and India: Factors Influencing (lack of) Adoption and Environmental Implications 11/4/2009

Three ULTra Case Studies examples of the performance of the system in three different environments

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Pilot project to introduce electric mobility. Sergio Fernández Project Manager. March 2011

10 Th Urban Mobility Conference / CODATU XVII Innovative Funding For Urban Mobility Case study: RATP & Ile-de France mobility

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Transport and the rural economy. Gordon Stokes

APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS

LRT Almaty, PPP. 23 January 2018, Brussels

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

The Environmental Benefits and Opportunity of Shared Mobility

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

LONG-TERM TRENDS IN MODAL SHARE FOR URBAN PASSENGER TRAVEL

Igor Baria BRAZILIAN URBAN RAIL SYSTEMS SCENARIO. Balance 2016/2017

Aging of the light vehicle fleet May 2011

Energy Saving Potential Study on Thailand s Road Sector:

Continental Mobility Study Klaus Sommer Hanover, December 15, 2011

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): URBAN TRANSPORT

Amman Green Policies Projects and Challenges. Prepared by: Eng. Sajeda Alnsour Project coordinator Sept. 20, 2017

Is The Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project the answer?

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

Bus and coach transport for greening mobility

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

Moving around Metro Vancouver: EXPLORING NEW APPROACHES TO REDUCING CONGESTION

REPUBLIC OF CHILE. GDP per capita: 1980 s: $2, s: $3, s: $8, : $15,700. Population: Country: 17.6 M Santiago: 6.5 M.

Ex-Ante Evaluation (for Japanese ODA Loan)

The development of the Milan transport system and the ECOPASS congestion charge

8. TRIP DISTRIBUTION. 8.1 Trip Distribution by Trip Purpose. Figures 8.1 show desire lines by trip purpose. < To Work >

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Mobile Area Transportation Study Urban Area and Planning Boundary

CSE CONCLAVE. ENABLING CITY ACTION PLAN FOR CLEAN AIR India Habitat Centre, New Delhi April 19-20,

Level of Service Analysis for Urban Public Transportation of Dumlupinar University Evliya Celebi Campus in Kutahya, Turkey

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

Evaluating opportunities for soot-free, low-carbon bus fleets in Brazil: São Paulo case study

ITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

Urban Transport systems in major cities in China. Sun Kechao Senior Engineer China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Beijing, China

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

DEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY

Mississauga Moves: A City in Transformation icity Symposium Hamish Campbell

The Built Environment and Motor Vehicle Ownership & Use. Outline

Smart Green Transportation of LG CNS. Seoul Case

Fiji Bus Industry: improving through greening

PSTA as a Mobility Manager

ECONOMIC SURVEY STATISTICAL APPENDIX

Cab Availability and Ridership in New York City,

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Projections of global emissions of air pollutants

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2015 LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT

Engineering Solutions to Congestion

OPTIMAL POLICIES FOR TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE

Planning of the HSR Network

Flexible and sustainable mobility for urban areas.

Chapter 4. Design and Analysis of Feeder-Line Bus. October 2016

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 2: USE OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

Transitioning to Integrated Sustainable Multi-mobility. A Model Climate Action Strategy

Our mission is to be the best public service transporter for passengers in the city of Kigali using modern, clean and safe urban city buses.

Low Emission Vehicle Policy Development in London

International Rubber Study Group, London Economic and Social Institute, Amsterdam

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Sri Lanka. Area = 65,610 sq. km. Population = 21.2 million Per Capita GDP US$ 3,835 GDP US$ 81.3 Billion GDP Growth 4.4%

Designing and financing resilient transport infrastructure

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Transcription:

Economy MCMA as important, but declining, force in national economy 38% of GDP in 1970; 33% of GDP in 1998 Most significant decline in Manufacturing 47% to 29% Relatively constant contribution of Financial Services (33%); Social Services (40-45%) and Construction (30-35%) In general, as goes the country, so goes the MCMA, but Average Annual Growth Rate (%) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0-1 National DF EM 1980-84 1985-1989 1990-1994 1995-1999 21

Intra-Municipal Economy EM expected to have higher economic growth rates in future But, also, higher population growth DF will, thus, likely maintain higher GDP/Capita As of 1993, Relative contribution to GRP: % Contribution to MCMA GDP 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DF Commercial Industrial Services EM 22

MCMA Major Roads & Salient Characteristics General Characteristics Concentration of suburban and interurban bus terminals (and main subway stations) in northern and eastern DF/EM boundaries Northern and Eastern roads primary means of access from suburban/exurban areas Existing airport on Eastern edge of DF (on Periferico) ~ 50,000 passenger trips/day 24

Passenger Travel Demand Passenger Travel Demand Data Origin-destination surveys reportedly conducted in 1977/78, 1983 and 1994 1994 survey done by the national statistics institute (INEGI) in cooperation with DF Reportedly 29,700 households (~1%), using 135 traffic analysis zones (TAZs) 29.1 vehicle trip segments 82% by public transport; 18% private transport Roughly 21 million vehicle trips 75% public transport, 25% private transport 1.2 per person or 5.4 per HH; Santiago 1.7/person 6.4/HH Does not include walking trips (10% in Buenos Aires, 20% in Santiago, 30% in Sao Paulo) Conservatively (15%) adds 3.6 million trips 1.4 per person or 6.4 per HH (Santiago 2.12 per person or 8 per HH) Other estimates, significantly different 19 million (1.35/person) in 1983 to 31 million (2/person) in 1994 25

Passenger Travel Demand What Future? DF Transport authority (2000) predicts Region-wide change 21 million trips 1994 (1.2 per capita) 14 million in DF (1.6/capita); 7 million in EM (.8/capita) 28 million in 2020 (1.08 per capita) 17 million in DF (1.9/capita); 11 million in EM (.63/cap) How Realistic?? Data from Santiago 1977-1991 Elasticity of per capita trips to income: 1.87 Elasticity of auto trips to income: 1.69 Elasticity of public transport trips to income: -0.46 What will the future really bring? 26

Passenger Travel Demand What Future?? 27

Freight Demand Rail freight enters at two terminals in Northwest Truck through traffic major influence (lack of bypass) Major freight terminal on southeastern boundary of DF; trucks heavier than 3.5 tonnes unload farm and agricultural products for delivery via lighter vehicles throughout the MCMA 29% of freight transported in MCMA originates in DF; 12% in EM; 59% outside MCMA 28

Major Freight Generators 29

Passenger Supply Private Autos 2.3-3 million 78 per 1000 pop. in 1976 to 135-166 per 1000 in 1996 1.2-1.76 persons per vehicle Taxis 69,000 primarily in DF; no DF-EM inter-operation Hoy No Circula Buses, major decline since mid-1970s 15,000 in 1976; today roughly 4,000 in DF 1000 operated by state-owned RTP Roughly 1,200 operated by private owned companies (former R-100 and more recent concession winners) Estimated 1,800 introduced by colectivo organizations Suburban Services in EM, uncertain number of vehicles Some Metropolitan Routes, but generally border transfer Marginal trolleybus service 30

Passenger Supply The rise of the Colectivo Originated as shared taxi sedans in 1950s Tolerated informally until some formalization in the late 1960s By early 1980s with government takeover of the bus system, colectivos thrived Unregulated, licensed service Owner-operator, in route association structure DF: 103 colectivo organizations ~27,000 vehicles EM: 172 organizations, 94 companies Probably similar, if not greater, number of vehicles 31

Passenger Supply Metro & Light Rail First lines built in late 1960s 11 lines, 200 kms, 167 stations Original 3 lines carry 64% of passengers Lowest Fares in the World Fares cover approximately 40-50% of operating costs Service confined to DF Ability to keep up with urban expansion? Exacerbating expansion? Realistic expansion plans? Light rail of 13 kms. 32

Metro Indicators 300 250 Ninth Line Operational Tenth Line Operational 4,500 4,000 3,500 200 3,000 150 2,500 2,000 100 1,500 50 Length of Lines in Service (Kms) Avg. Daily VKT (Thousand Kms) Trains in Service (Units) Avg. Daily Ridership (Thousands) 1,000 500 0 0 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 34

Public Transport Fares 35

Motor Vehicle Contribution to MCMA Pollutants PM 1 10 SO2 CO NOx VOC 2 Light Duty Private Vehicles 3 5.2% 11.6% 62.2% 32.4% 23.4% Colectivos 0.3% 0.9% 13.4% 5.1% 4.6% Taxis 1.0% 2.5% 7.4% 5.4% 3.2% Buses 5.9% 1.0% 0.5% 5.7% 0.8% Trucks 23.4% 4.8% 14.4% 32.0% 7.5% All Vehicles 35.9% 20.8% 98.0% 80.5% 39.5% 1. Does not include Road dust. 2. Does not include refueling. 3. Includes pick ups, motorcycles, diesel vehicles under 3 tonnes. Source: CAM, 2001. 39

Next Time Regional Architecture Some Responses Looking to the Future 40