Enhance Naphtha Value and Gasoline Reformer Performance Using UOP s MaxEne TM Process

Similar documents
Maximizing Refinery Margins by Petrochemical Integration

LD Parex TM Aromatics Complex: Lowest Cost of Production for PX Technology

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm Joseph C. Gentry, Director - Global Licensing Engineered to Innovate

Refining/Petrochemical Integration A New Paradigm. Anil Khatri, GTC Technology Coking and CatCracking Conference New Delhi - October 2013

Stephen Stanley Jose de Barros Fred Gardner Lummus Technology 1 st Indian Oil Petrochemical Conclave March 16, 2012 New Delhi

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm

GTC TECHNOLOGY WHITE PAPER

Refinery & Petrochemical Integration- An IOCL Perspective

Investment Planning of an Integrated Petrochemicals Complex & Refinery A Best Practice Approach

Solvent Deasphalting Conversion Enabler

Quenching Our Thirst for Clean Fuels

INTRODUCTION Enabling Iran s Future Through Partnership and Technology

Refinery / Petrochemical. Integration. Gildas Rolland

CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY 2-1 TECHNICAL ASPECTS 2-1 ECONOMIC ASPECTS 2-2

Process Economics Program

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 203 ALKANE DEHYDROGENATION AND AROMATIZATION (September 1992)

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM SRI INTERNATIONAL Menlo Park, California

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 158A OCTANE IMPROVERS FOR GASOLINE (February 1992)

ACO TM, The Advanced Catalytic Olefins Process

A new simple and robust process FT-NIR Spectrometer with small footprint and extended maintenance interval

Modernization of Libyan Oil Refineries and Petrochemical Plants

Modernizing a Vintage Cat Cracker. Don Leigh HFC Rahul Pillai KBR Steve Tragesser KBR

The Role of a New FCC Gasoline Three-Cut Splitter in Transformation of Crude Oil Hydrocarbons in CRC

Mr. Steve Jenkins Head Global PX and Derivatives PCI X&P Malaysia

MAXIMIZING PARAXYLENE PRODUCTION WITH PARAMAX

UOP UNITY Hydrotreating Products

SCANFINING TECHNOLOGY: A PROVEN OPTION FOR PRODUCING ULTRA-LOW SULFUR CLEAN GASOLINE

THE OIL & GAS SUPPLY CHAIN: FROM THE GROUND TO THE PUMP ON REFINING

IHS CHEMICAL Light Hydrocarbon and Light Naphtha Utilization. Process Economics Program Report 297. Light Hydrocarbon and Light Naphtha Utilization

ON-PURPOSE PROPYLENE FROM OLEFINIC STREAMS

Middle East DownStream Weak May 2013 ABU DHABI, UAE

UOP/EMRE Alliance for High Quality Lube and Diesel Production Technology

The Role of the Merox Process in the Era of Ultra Low Sulfur Transportation Fuels. 5 th EMEA Catalyst Technology Conference 3 & 4 March 2004

REFINING PETROCHEMICALS INTEGRATION

GTC TECHNOLOGY. GT-BTX PluS Reduce Sulfur Preserve Octane Value - Produce Petrochemicals. Engineered to Innovate WHITE PAPER

Mr. Joseph C. Gentry. Director, Global Licensing GTC Technology US, LLC USA

REFINERY PROCESS AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

Renewable Liquids as Steam Cracker Feedstocks

Maximizing Profitability from Unconventional Oil and Gas using UOP Technologies

Lummus Technology and GTC. FCC Gasoline Desulfurization with CDHDS+ /GT-BTX PluS. A World of Solutions

Downstream & Chemicals

Catalytic Reforming for Aromatics Production. Topsoe Catalysis Forum Munkerupgaard, Denmark August 27 28, 2015 Greg Marshall GAM Engineering LLC 1

Focus on Refinery Product Flows

Presentation. Strategy of Octane Management at IOCL Mathura Refinery

Abu Dhabi International Downstream Summit 2017 Downstream optimization: role of technology, integration and industrial gases. Dr.Ch.

Boost you Xylene Loop Performance with OPARIS TM. Authors : F. Alario*, J. Rault** * IFP Kinetic and Catalysis Division ** Axens Technology Division

Innovative Solutions for Optimizing Refining & Petrochemicals Synergies. Jean-Paul Margotin

Refinery/ Petrochemical Integration An option or a necessity? Steven Kantorowicz

New Residue Up-grading Complex at European Refinery Achieves Euro 5 Specifications

Focus on Slurry Hydrocracking Uniflex Process Upgrade Bottom-of-the-Barrel to Improve Margins

DUR O LOK couplings are all-purpose, lightweight connectors designed to replace standard ANSI flanges.

Recycle and Catalytic Strategies for Maximum FCC Light Cycle Oil Operations

Analyst Presentation 1Q 2008 Results

A) Particulars of organization

May Feedstock Disruptions in Chemicals chains necessitate business model innovation

ETHYLENE-PROPYLENE PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No. 29A. Supplement A. by SHIGEYOSHI TAKAOKA With contributions by KIICHIRO OHYA.

Converting Visbreakers to Delayed Cokers - An Opportunity for European Refiners

Jagdish Rachh, TSC EMEA, 4 th October UniSim Design New Refining Reactors Deep Dive

Co-Processing of Green Crude in Existing Petroleum Refineries. Algae Biomass Summit 1 October

Seeing is believing:

The Petrochemical Industry From Middle Eastern Perspective?

CHEMSYSTEMS. Report Abstract. Petrochemical Market Dynamics Feedstocks

PEP Review ON-PURPOSE BUTADIENE PRODUCTION By Richard Nielsen with a Contribution by Russell Heinen (June 2011)

Downstream Petroleum Sector The Growing Prominence of Asian Refining

Petroleum Refining Fourth Year Dr.Aysar T. Jarullah

Fig:1.1[15] Fig.1.2 Distribution of world energy resources. (From World Energy Outlook 2005, International Energy Agency.)[16,17]

IHS CHEMICAL PEP Report 29J. Steam Cracking of Crude Oil. Steam Cracking of Crude Oil. PEP Report 29J. Gajendra Khare Principal Analyst

Production of Transportation Fuels by Co-processing Biomass-Derived Pyrolysis Oils in a Petroleum Refinery Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit

PRESENTATION TO FOURTH IEA-IEF-OPEC SYMPOSIUM ON ENERGY OUTLOOKS

Impact of Sustainability and Environmental Factors on Technology Obsolescence

Unit 1. Naphtha Catalytic Reforming. Assistant lecturers Belinskaya Nataliya Sergeevna Kirgina Maria Vladimirovna

Downstream & Chemicals

KBR Technology Business

Olefins Recovery CRYO PLUS TECHNOLOGY

OCTANE THE NEW ECONOMICS OF. What Drives the Cost of Octane and Why Octane Costs Have Risen Since 2012 T. J. HIGGINS. A Report By:

Bio-Renewable Fuels: Green Diesel

Strategies for Maximizing FCC Light Cycle Oil

A New Refining Process for Efficient Naphtha Utilization: Parallel Operation of a C 7+ Isomerization Unit with a Reformer

The Greener FCC Moving from Fuels to Petrochemicals

Methaforming Production of gasoline from naphtha and methanol at 1/3 the cost. NGTS customer presentation for ERTC 8Oct17 metric 1

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 222 PETROLEUM INDUSTRY OUTLOOK (July 1999)

UTILIZING CHEAP GAS TO MAXIMIZE REFINERY PROFITS IN NORTH AMERICA. Daniel B Gillis and Ujjal K Mukherjee, Chevron Lummus Global Gary M Sieli, CB&I

National Iranian Oil Engineering & Construction Co.

Challenges and Solutions for Shale Oil Upgrading

UOP Unicracking TM Process Innovations in Hydrocracking Technology

Schwechat Refinery Visit

Technip Stone & Webster Process Technology Offering in Refining

CONVERT RESIDUE TO PETROCHEMICALS

Chapter 11 Gasoline Production

Opportunity in Map Ta Phut Retrofit Knowledge Sharing Session. February 18, 2016

HOW OIL REFINERIES WORK

Integrating Refinery with Petrochemicals: Advanced Technological Solutions for Synergy and Improved Profitability

Eni Slurry Technology:

FCC UNIT FEEDSTOCK FLEXIBILITY IN MOL S DANUBE REFINERY

PILOT PLANT DESIGN, INSTALLATION & OPERATION Training Duration 5 days

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

THE CHANGING WORLD OF RAW MATERIALS: IMPACT OF ADHESIVES AND COATINGS. Ingrid Brase

FUTURE SUPPLIES OF PARAXYLENE FEEDSTOCK

IHS Petrochemical Outlook

Maximize Vacuum Residue Conversion and Processing Flexibility with the UOP Uniflex Process

Transcription:

Enhance Naphtha Value and Gasoline Reformer Performance Using UOP s MaxEne TM Process Mark Turowicz UOP IPL, A Honeywell Company 1st IndianOil Petrochemical Conclave March 16, 2012 Gurgaon, India 2011 UOP LLC. All rights reserved. UOP 5614D-1

Contents MaxEne Technology Introduction Market Drivers for MaxEne Projects MaxEne Case Studies MaxEne Commercial Experience UOP 5614D-2

Refining-Petrochemical Integration The MaxEne Process was developed to help optimize the integration of refining and petrochemical facilities Normal paraffins are the preferred feed to naphtha crackers for optimized yields of light olefins (ethylene + propylene) Catalytic reforming yields increase significantly (octane barrels and aromatics yield) when paraffins are removed from the feed In an optimally integrated complex with MaxEne Process: N-paraffins are fed to the cracker resulting in: Upto a 30% increase in ethylene and propylene yield Paraffin depletion (and enriching of napthenes/ aromatics) in the feed to the Platformer results in: 4-6% increase in C 5 + yield at constant octane 2-3% increase in aromatics yield Full Range Naphtha Full Range Naphtha MaxEne Unit Typical Integrated Complex Naphtha Cracker Catalytic Reformer Naphtha Cracker Catalytic Reformer The MaxEne Process delivers benefits in an integrated facility and can also provide substantial benefits to the stand-alone refiner UOP 5614D-3

How Does the MaxEne Process Work? Adsorptive separation Adsorbent Chamber Rotary Valve Desorbent Extract Column n-paraffins feed to steam cracker Based on Sorbex TM Technology The adsorbent has greater affinity for n-paraffins Simulates a moving bed Pumparound pump Feed Naphtha Raffinate Column Feed to reformer The process influent and effluent points move, but the actual mechanical connections do not The solid adsorbent is in fixed, non-moving beds The liquid feed flows countercurrently relative to the solid More than 130 process units based on Sorbex Technology licensed worldwide UOP 5614D-4

Extension of Previous UOP Experience in Naphtha Separation Liquid phase extraction technology widely used to recover n-paraffins Gasoline Molex process (C 5 to C 6 ) in light naphtha isomerization applications for octane improvement 15 licensed units Kerosene Molex process (C 10 to C 13 ) for detergent applications. Heavy Molex process (C 14 to C 18 ) for other surfactant applications 35 licensed units MaxEne process (C 6 to C 11 ) bridges the carbon range between Gasoline and Kerosene Molex UOP 5614D-5

Contents MaxEne Technology Introduction Market Drivers for MaxEne Projects MaxEne Case Studies MaxEne Commercial Experience UOP 5614D-6

Average 2010 Steam Cracker Feedstock Slates Source: CMAI 2011 World Ethylene Cost Study Other than in N America and the ME, most steam cracker capacity is from naphtha -- presents an opportunity to refiners UOP 5614D-7

Contents MaxEne Technology Introduction Market Drivers for MaxEne Projects MaxEne Case Studies MaxEne Commercial Experience UOP 5614D-8

Case Study 1: MaxEne Process Integration Integration with a Catalytic Reformer Goal Maximize Catalytic Reformer profitability when market demand requires less gasoline production Produce high quality petrochemical naphtha for domestic or export sales Basis for integration Feed is a full range naphtha (FRN). FRN rate kept constant. MaxEne unit, catalytic reformer and steam cracker yields based on feed composition Feed, major products, and by-products included W. Europe price-set assumed with reformate price based on octane value Catalytic Reformer originally designed for 102 RONC but currently running at 96 RONC based on market need Why was MaxEne considered? Flexibility to increase reformate yield and/or octane Minimize changes to catalytic reformer Increase value of export naphtha UOP 5614D-9

Existing Refinery Complex * Purchased naphtha from other refiner *328 Yields, 545 873 Cracker C 2 = 316 C 3 = 162 478 1400 Full range naphtha 3.22 Wt-% H 2 Yield 27.5 Petrochemical Facility NHT 855 Catalytic Reformer 93.0 Wt-% C 5+ Yield 96 RONC 795 UOP 5614D-10

Refinery Complex with MaxEne Constant Full Range Naphtha * Purchased naphtha from other refiner 1400 Full range naphtha NHT 474 207 Normals 681 MaxEne Unit Non-normals 584 531 136 Can run catalytic reformer at higher severity with higher quality feedstock DeC 6 on MaxEne raffinate to remove Bz pre-cursors from reformer feed *192 873 667 Cracker Petrochemical Facility 52 / 82 RONC (light gasoline to blending) 3.68 Wt-% H 2 Yield 24.5 kmta Catalytic Reformer reformer Yields, C 2 = 337 C 3 = 171 508 104 RONC 607 91.0 Wt-% C 5+ Yield UOP 5614D-11

The MaxEne Process Effect Case Study #1 - Refinery Balance Existing with MaxEne Full Range Naphtha 1400 1400 Export Naphtha 545 681 n-paraffin Wt-% 42 62 Reformer Feed 855 667 Light Gasoline 0 52 Reformer Gasoline 795 607 RONC 96 104 Hydrogen 28 25 Tail Gas 11 12 LPG 22 24 MaxEne minimizes financial impact of lower reformate production via: Production of Light gasoline with 82 RONC Production of 104 RONC Reformate (within existing unit constraints of WAIT, Heater Duty and CCR Size) Production of Higher Quality (higher % n-paraffin) Petrochemical Naphtha Export UOP 5614D-12

$M/yr The MaxEne Process Effect Case Study #1 - Refinery GM Comparison 1400 Existing With MaxEne 1200 $176M $199M 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Feedstock Products Feedstock Products Feedstock Export Naphtha Reformate Light Gasoline Hydrogen LPG Tail Gas MaxEne resulted in $23M/yr incremental gross margin increase GM increase supports capital investment for MaxEne with simple payback periods < 3 years Export Naphtha value increase of $30/MT assumed based on sharing benefit with Ethylene Cracker UOP 5614D-13

The MaxEne Process Effect Case Study #1 - Steam Cracker Balance Existing w/maxene Existing w/maxene KMTA KMTA $M/yr $M/yr Feed 872 872 654 674 H2 11 9 12 10 Fuel Gas 138 107 36 27 C2= 316 337 +7% 462 493 v +6% C3= 162 171 243 256 C4 s 95 87 89 81 pygas 150 163 135 148 Total 872 872 324 341 GM Increase - 17 Pay MaxEne refiner 4% premium for high quality PC Naphtha Feedstock to get 5% GM increase Increased paraffin content to cracker results in $17M/yr additional GM with $30/MT premium on refiner export naphtha price for 500 kmta cracker (ethylene+propylene). UOP 5614D-14

MaxEne Process Integration Case Study #2 Integration with a Catalytic Reformer Goal Maximize yields of catalytic reformate (and hydrogen) Produce high quality petrochemical naphtha for domestic or export sales Basis for integration Feed is a full range naphtha (FRN). FRN rate allowed to increase. MaxEne unit, catalytic reformer and steam cracker yields based on feed composition Feed, major products, and by-products included W. Europe price-set assumed with reformate price based on octane value Feed rate to catalytic reformer kept constant and increased. Catalytic Reformer originally designed for 102 RONC and running at nameplate conditions Why was MaxEne considered? Increase reformate and hydrogen yield Minimize changes to catalytic reformer Increase value of export naphtha UOP 5614D-15

Existing Refinery Complex * Purchased naphtha from other refiner *328 Yields, 545 873 Cracker C 2 = 316 C 3 = 162 478 1400 Full range naphtha 3.75 Wt-% H 2 Yield 32 Petrochemical Facility NHT 855 Catalytic Reformer 90.4 Wt-% C 5+ Yield 102 RONC 772 UOP 5614D-16

Refinery Complex with MaxEne Constant Reformer Feedrate 1794 Full range naphtha 174 NHT 607 265 Normals Additional FRN required to keep reformer full 872 MaxEne Unit Non-normals 748 681 DeC 6 on MaxEne raffinate to remove Bz pre-cursors from reformer feed 0 855 Cracker Petrochemical Facility 67 / 82 RONC (light gasoline to blending) 3.46 Wt-% H 2 Yield 30 Catalytic Reformer reformer Yields, C 2 = 347 C 3 = 175 522 102 RONC 789 92.4 Wt-% C 5+ Yield UOP 5614D-17

Refinery Complex with MaxEne Constant Reformer Feedrate 1794 Full range naphtha 174 NHT 265 Normals MaxEne process allows reformer to run at 11% over existing production rate 872 MaxEne Unit Non-normals 748 95 0 950 Cracker Petrochemical Facility 67 / 82 RONC (light gasoline to blending) 3.46 Wt-% H 2 Yield 33 Catalytic Reformer reformer Yields, C 2 = 347 C 3 = 175 522 102 RONC 878 92.4 Wt-% C 5+ Yield UOP 5614D-18

The MaxEne Process Effect Case Study #2 - Refinery Balance Existing with MaxEne Cases Full Range Naphtha 1400 1794 1794 CCR Range Naphtha 95 Export Naphtha 545 872 872 Reformer Feed 855 855 950 Light Gasoline 0 67 67 Reformer Gasoline 772 789 878 Hydrogen 32 30 33 Tail Gas 17 12 13 LPG 34 24 26 MaxEne enables: Richer feed allows reformer to run at higher capacity while still staying within CCR regenerator capacity, Rx WAIT and heater duty Production of Light gasoline with 82 RONC Increase in C 5+ gasoline yield at constant octane Higher quality (higher % paraffin) Petrochemical Naphtha Export that can command premium pricing UOP 5614D-19

$M/yr The MaxEne Process Effect Case Study #2 - Refinery GM Comparison 1800 Existing w/maxene w/maxene w/max Reformer 1600 1400 $247M $271M 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 $208M Feedstock Products Feedstock Products Feedstock Products Feedstock Export Naphtha Reformate Light Gasoline Hydrogen LPG Tail Gas MaxEne resulted in $39-63M/yr incremental gross margin increase GM increase supports capital investment for MaxEne with simple payback periods < 2 years Export Naphtha value increase of $30/MT assumed based on sharing benefit with Ethylene Cracker UOP 5614D-20

The MaxEne Process Effect Case Study #2 - Steam Cracker Balance Existing w/maxene Existing w/maxene KMTA KMTA $M/yr $M/yr Feed 872 872 654 680 H2 11 8 12 9 Fuel Gas 138 103 36 27 C2= 316 347 +10% 462 507 v +8% C3= 162 175 243 262 C4 s 95 83 89 78 pygas 150 156 135 141 Total 872 872 324 344 GM Increase - 20 Pay MaxEne refiner 2% premium for high quality PC Naphtha Feedstock to get 10% GM increase Increased paraffin content to cracker results in $20M/yr additional GM with $30/MT premium on naphtha price for 500 kmta cracker (ethylene+propylene). UOP 5614D-21

Contents MaxEne Technology Introduction Market Drivers for MaxEne Projects MaxEne Case Studies MaxEne Commercial Experience UOP 5614D-22

MaxEne feedrate 1.2 MMTA MaxEne Commercialization Status First unit to come on-stream in Asia in 2012 Refinery-Petrochemical Integration Application Licensee is refinery and cracker operator MaxEne feedrate is 1.2 MMTA (1200 ) UOP 5614D-23

In Conclusion European and Asian refiners will need outlet for naphtha as diesel continues to be transportation fuel of choice. Over half of the world s ethylene comes from cracking naphtha MaxEne can help refiners face the increasing shift towards diesel by Maximizing existing catalytic reforming assets Producing a premium petrochemical naphtha feedstock for sales to petrochemical producers MaxEne is an extension of well-proven, reliable commercial Sorbex technology used in aromatics, refining and detergents applications. First commercial unit start-up in 2012 in Asia UOP 5614D-24

UOP 5614D-25