Small GTL A New Midstream Opportunity

Similar documents
Technical Session: Crude Oil Supply High Quality Competitive Distillate Fuels from Coal-to-Liquids Processing

Natural Gas to Liquid/Diesel - Modular Technology Flares, Stranded or Pipeline Natural Gas

Supply of Services for Detailed OEB Crude Assay Analysis

2014 Gas/Electric Partnership

Crude Assay Report. Crude Oil sample marked. Barrow Crude Oil. On Behalf Of. Chevron Australia Pty Ltd. Laboratory Supervisor. Crude Assay Chemist

GTL Technology and its Potential Impact on the Global Energy Markets

Conversion of Peanut Oil into Jet and Diesel Fuels. Panama City, Florida 22 July 2016 Edward N. Coppola

GTL Technology and its Potential Impact on the Global Energy Markets

Acomprehensive analysis was necessary to

An Upstream Success Story in a $50 Oil World 2015 IGTC 2015, DUBAI 1

Louis Dreyfus Claypool Holdings, LLC. Biodiesel Production Plant Claypool, Indiana

Acombination. winning

Modular GTL Industry Approved & Operating

D3MAX Update 2017 FEW. Mark Yancey, CTO D3MAX LLC Office: (701) Cell: (303)

NATURAL GAS MONETIZATION PATHWAYS

Table of Contents. Copyright and Trademarks 5. Copyright 5 Revision 5 Disclaimer of Liability 5 Copy and Use Restrictions 5.

- Supercritical Water Cracking Technology -

Neville Hargreaves Gastech, April 2017, Tokyo. Roll out of smaller scale GTL technology at ENVIA Energy s plant in Oklahoma City, USA

ABCs of GTL. Dr. Ronald Sills Founding Director, XTL & DME Institute SM

Agenda Velocys Introduction Modular FT Technology Conventional FT Technology FT Demonstration Status Modular Hydrocracking Technology

Life-Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Results of Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Produced from Natural Gas, Coal, and Biomass

Heartland Pipeline. Heartland Pipeline Company Product Specifications. Effective Date: 10/1/2015

OIL REFINERY PROCESSES

Technology Development within Alternative Fuels. Yves Scharff

REBCO (RUSSIAN EXPORT BLEND CRUDE OIL) SPECIFICATION GOST

Specifications Of Straight Run Naphtha for Exportation

Oxidative Desulfurization. IAEE Houston Chapter June 11, 2009

ASTM D Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel (B 100) Blend Stock for Distillate Fuels

UPGRADER FOR HEAVY, EXTRA-HEAVY CRUDE/BITUMEN AND RESIDUAL FRACTIONS

Conversion of Carinata Oil into Drop-in Fuels & Chemicals. Carinata Summit Quincy, Florida 15 March 2016

ASTM #2 Diesel Fuel Sample ID: DF21210

Bio-Renewable Fuels: Green Diesel

SELLING GTL SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE MARKETING OF GTL PRODUCTS

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Utilizing Small-Scale GTL for Distributed Fuel Production

ALASKA RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT A LEGACY DECISION FOR ALASKA

Exceeding Expectations

Maximizing Refinery Margins by Petrochemical Integration

Crude to Chemicals. Opportunities and Challenges of an Industry Game-Changer. MERTC, Bahrain. January 23, 2017

Why Light Duty Diesels Make Sense in the North American Market MARTEC. Automotive News World Congress. January 16, 2007

HQCEC has contracted KBC to obtain an assessment of future market and market pricing. The market study results have been used as the basis of study.

D 5966 Roller Follower Wear Test. Final Report Cover Sheet. Report Packet Version No. Conducted For:

Bakken Well Economics & Production Forecasting

Argus Americas Base Oils Summit Houston May Iraj Isaac Rahmim, PhD E-MetaVenture, Inc. Houston, Texas

Ceiba Crude (31.44 API, Sul WT%)

LCO Processing Solutions. Antoine Fournier

Investment Planning of an Integrated Petrochemicals Complex & Refinery A Best Practice Approach

MUTINEER EXETER CRUDE OIL. Santos Limited

CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY 2-1 TECHNICAL ASPECTS 2-1 ECONOMIC ASPECTS 2-2

A Transportation Perspective on Biodiesel and Advanced Biomass Conversion Fuels. California Energy Commission Sacramento, CA March 1, 2005

Test Method D5967 Mack T-8. Version. Method: Conducted For

LNG versus GTL: The Impact of Unconventional Gas

Optimization of Toluene-Benzene Reactor

Results Certified by Core Labs for Conoco Canada Ltd. Executive summary. Introduction

White Paper.

ETHYLENE-PROPYLENE PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No. 29A. Supplement A. by SHIGEYOSHI TAKAOKA With contributions by KIICHIRO OHYA.

Conversion Processes 1. THERMAL PROCESSES 2. CATALYTIC PROCESSES

On-Line Process Analyzers: Potential Uses and Applications

AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION SULPHUR REGULATIONS

Challenges and Solutions for Shale Oil Upgrading

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 203 ALKANE DEHYDROGENATION AND AROMATIZATION (September 1992)

Technologies & Economics

ND Pipeline Authority Web Presentation

Annex no. 1 of Accreditation Certificate no. LI 333 from

There is no shortage of attention on the issue of Bakken related natural gas flaring.

Low Cost Electricity Micro-Grid Service and Biofuel. Kevin Marnell

Commercializing the Rentech Process

SOLVENT DEASPHALTING OPTIONS How SDA can increase residue upgrading margins

US Shale Liquids Surge: Implications for the Crude Oil Value Chain

3Q 2016 Analyst Presentation

Preface... xii. 1. Refinery Distillation... 1

Volatility Advantage for CRT

National Iranian Oil Engineering & Construction Co.

JBUFF & TED Programs Value Proposition Business Model Return on Investment (ROI)

IMM CONE CT Study Results

Co-Processing of Green Crude in Existing Petroleum Refineries. Algae Biomass Summit 1 October

St. Clair County Road Commission Specifications Diesel Fuels

Valero Energy Corporation (NYSE: VLO)

Tung Xiao Dan Assistant Chemist Mark Tan Section Head Feedstock Evaluation Department

Dr Philipp Stratmann ABLC, Washington DC, March Roll-out of smaller scale gas-toliquids: current commercialisation. and future approach

Using Pyrolysis Tar to meet Fuel Specifications in Coal-to-Liquids Plants

Q Matti Lievonen President and CEO

Desulphurizing Bunker Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology

Renewable Jet Propulsion

Annual KRTA Report for the Year 2016

FSR on Expansion and Modernization of the MOIN Refinery Project

Synfuels International, Inc. Upstream GTL Solutions for Flaring. Edward Peterson, PhD, P.E., Chief Engineer

Regional Laboratory, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Korukkupet Terminal, Kathivakkam High Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

CRUDE OIL SPECIFICATIONS

Exceed Your Hydrocracker Potential Using The Latest Generation Flexible Naphtha/Middle Distillate Catalysts

Sensitivity analysis and determination of optimum temperature of furnace for commercial visbreaking unit

Phillips Texas Pipeline Company, LTD. Amarillo-Lubbock Pipeline (SAAL) Product Specifications

Conversion of Carinata Oil into Drop-in Fuels & Chemicals Ed Coppola Principal Engineer Quincy, Florida 28 April 2015

Technology Trend of Fuels in the Future

Crude Assay, ASTM, TBP distillations, Evaluation of crude oil properties.

Transitioning from Commercial Pilot to Mass Production 2 IUT s skid mounted 15,000 barrel per day Processing Unit

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17043:2010. ASTM INTERNATIONAL 100 Barr Harbor Drive West Conshohocken, PA Amy Meacock

TARIFF DECISION FOR SASOL OIL (PTY) LTD S SECUNDA TO NATREF INTEGRATED (SNI) PIPELINE

Changes to America s Gasoline Pool. Charles Kemp. May 17, Baker & O Brien, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cosmo Oil Co., Ltd. Presentation on Results for First Quarter of Fiscal 2012 August 2, 2012 Director: Satoshi Miyamoto

Transcription:

Small GTL A New Midstream Opportunity March 4, 2014 Mark Agee VP Business Development

Some Definitions: In this presentation, GTL (Gas-To-Liquids) refers to the conversion of natural gas into hydrocarbon liquids, primarily middles distillates (diesel and jet) and naphtha via Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis. 2

(Some Definitions) Large GTL Over 30,000 BPD (Shell and Sasol) Medium GTL 10,000 to 30,000 BPD Small GTL - 500 BPD up to 10,000 BPD Goal of all: Monetize Natural Gas via the liquid Petroleum Markets 3

GTL becomes a viable option when: The oil/gas ratio (WTI/Henry Hub) is at least 20 or Synergies exist with other revenue opportunities that enhance the overall economics and There is a financeable mechanism to hedge the oil/gas ratio risk over the finance term of the plant 4

GTL Synergies/Opportunities: Trapped oil - flaring no longer allowed, no available market for gas Curtailed NGL production - due to Ethane Bubble or Methane Bubble Pipeline constraints regional oversupply, prices depressed significantly below Henry Hub 5

GTL Basics Natural Gas Hydrogen Syngas Production Clean-Up FT Synthesis Product Upgrading Jet Diesel Naphtha Air Separation Process Integration - Utilities 6

ASTM D-975 No. 2-D Diesel Fuel Typical GTL Product specs: Blend Stock (4) Parameter ASTM Method Unit Value Ref Criteria Value Water and Sediment D-2709 % Vol 0 0.05 Max 0 Ash % D-482 Wt % 0 0.01 Max 0 Sulfur (S-15) D-5453 ppm (ug/g) 0 15 max 0 Copper Strip Corrosion D-130 1 No. 3 Max 1 Cetane number D-613 > 70 40 Min > 70 Cetane Index D-976 75.5 40 Min > 70 Lubricity HFRR @ 60 C D-6079 Microns 450 (3) 520 Max n/a Conductivity D-2624 C.U. 50-600 (3) 25 Min n/a Flash Point D-93 C 54 52 Min 60-64 Cloud Point D-2500 C -17 (1) (2) -20 Kinematic Viscosity @ 40 C D-445 cst 1.984 1.9 Min < 1.9 Kinematic Viscosity @ 40 C D-445 cst 1.984 4.1 Max > 4.1 Distillation 90% Vol Recovered D-86 C 313 Min 282 290 Distillation 90% Vol Recovered D-86 C 313 Max 338 330 Ramsbottom Carbon D-524 % Mass <.35 0.35 Max <.35 (1) Data from EFT lab method (2) Based on specific geographic location and time of year (3) with Additive (4) directional only Note: Finished fuels require additives per EPA and DOT regulations. Blend Stock Yields as high as 83% (17% Naphtha) D-975 Yields around 75% (25% Naphtha) Diesel Blend Stock is the most common product because the value is the same, yield is higher and is usually sold to others to make finished fuels. 7

Typical GTL Product Specs JP-8 Appendix A GTL -SPK Specification Units Minimum Maximum Distillation 10% recovered C 205 Final BP C 300 Commercial Lab Value 164.8 280.1 Freeze Point C -47-64 Flash Point C 38 46 Density kg/l @ 15 C 0.751 0.770 0.753 Viscosity (+/1 20 C) cst 8.0 4.506 Yields as high as 65% (35% naphtha) More economical: 50% Diesel 30% Jet 20% Naphtha SPK jet is always blended with petroleum jet per ASTM 7566 requirements Fischer-Tropsch Paraffinic Naphtha Parameter ASTM Method Unit Value Flash Point D-93 C -23 Freeze Point D-5972 C -102 (1) Density @ 15 C D-1298 Kg/m 3 0.69 (1) Distillation 10% Vol Recovered D-2887 C 89.4(2) Distillation 50% Recovered D-2887 C 98.8 (2) Distillation End Point D-2887 C 184.6 (2) (1) Data from EFT lab method (2) D-86 Correlation 8 Naphtha characteristics vary based on what other products are

Baseline Assumptions - 2,000 BPD GTL Plant: TIC: $213 million Debt: 60% Equity: 40% Products: 81% Diesel at $3.00/gal $126/Bbl 19% Naphtha at WTI + 5% $105/Bbl 9

Baseline Assumptions - 2,000 BPD GTL Plant: (Continued) Nat Gas consumption: 19.5 MMSCFD (9700 SCF/Bbl) Electric Power: Plant total 9900 KW Plant Generated 7410 KW Net Purchased 2490 KW Cooling water: 658 GPM Waste water: 253 GPM to local utility Land Requirements: 15-20 Acre (depends on storage capacity) 10

Project Summary Information Base Case $4 Gas Feedstock Estimated Construction Costs Site Prep/Earth Work $ 845,000 Land 1,000,000 Structures/Foundations 3,425,000 Process Equipment 91,600,000 Support Equipment (Loading, etc) 19,200,000 Oxygen plant 16,000,000 Permitting 225,000 EPC related 24,000,000 Other fees 6,964,130 Total Direct Construction Costs 163,259,130 Indirect Construction Costs 22,000,000 Contingency (15%) 27,788,870 $ 213,048,000 11

Project Summary Information Base Case $4 Gas Feedstock Labor Costs Operating Labor Staff Salary Benefits Total Plant Manager 1 $140,000 35% $ 189,000 Operations Manager 1 $80,000 35% 108,000 Lab Manager 1 $80,000 35% 108,000 Lab Techs 2 $60,000 35% 162,000 Process Engineer 1 $100,000 35% 135,000 Plant Reliability Engineer 1 $100,000 35% 135,000 Environmental Health Safety Engr. 1 $80,000 35% 108,000 Office Mmnger/Admin Assistant 1 $43,000 35% 58,050 Product Shipping/Logistics 1 $55,000 35% 74,250 Shift Supervisors 4 $72,000 35% 388,800 Control Room Operators 8 $65,000 35% 702,000 Auxiliary Operations 12 $65,000 35% 1,053,000 Total Headcount and Costs 34 $ 3,221,100 12

Project Summary Information Base Case $4 Gas Feedstock Example of Annual Operations ($000s) Annual Operating at 340 days of production 681,360.00 BBLs Capital Cost Year 3 of Operations Facility $ 205,674,450 Per BBL % of Rev Initial Catalyst $ 7,373,550 Revenue Total $ 213,048,000 Diesel $ 69,829.20 84% Naphtha 13,351.80 16% Funding: Equity 40% $ 90,400,000 Total revenues 83,181.00 $ 122.08 100% Debt Commitment 60% $ 135,600,000 Term in months 120 Interest Rate 7% Fixed Expenses: Commitment Fee 0.5% Labor Costs 3,221.10 4.73 4% Routine and Major Maintenance 4,830.11 7.09 6% Revenues: Price/BBL Product Split General Consumables & Tools 125.00 0.18 0% Environmental Testing 225.00 0.33 0% Diesel $ 126.00 81% General and Admin 555.00 0.81 1% Naphtha $ 105.00 19% Insurance and Tax 1,940.48 2.85 2% Production BBL/Day 2,004 Total Fixed Costs 10,896.68 15.99 13% Leveraged IRR on Equity 16.1% Variable Expenses: Feedstock Gas 26,436.77 38.80 32% NPV after debt service $ 156,547,515 Royalties 1,635.26 2.40 2% Catalysts and Chemicals (net of metals recoveries) 2,973.05 4.36 4% Note- IRR and NPV used 20 year operating cash flow Power 660.90 0.97 1% assumption using average of last 5 years for Make-up Water and non-forecasted years. Wastewater 284.07 0.42 0% Marketing & Delivery 1,717.03 2.52 2% Total Variable Expenses 33,707.07 49.47 41% Total Fixed and Variable 44,603.75 65.46 54% EBITDA 38,577.25 56.62 46% Depreciation 10,307.49 15.13 12% Interest 6,429.40 9.44 8% Net income (loss) before taxes $ 21,840.35 $ 32.05 26% 13

Project Operating Statement Base Case $4 Gas Feedstock $000s, except per BBL and Days Revenue Construction Operating Revenue Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 or Cost Per BBL Diesel $ 54,631.08 $ 67,364.64 $ 69,829.20 $ 67,364.64 $ 69,829.20 Naphtha 10,445.82 12,880.56 13,351.80 12,880.56 13,351.80 Total revenues 65,076.90 80,245.20 83,181.00 80,245.20 83,181.00 $ 122.08 Cost of sales Feedstock and supply costs 20,682.88 25,503.71 26,436.77 25,503.71 26,436.77 38.80 Direct labor and overheads 3,163.05 3,163.05 3,163.05 3,163.05 3,163.05 4.64 Catalyst 3,309.31 3,309.31 2,973.05 2,973.05 2,973.05 4.36 Total cost of sales 27,155.24 31,976.06 32,572.87 31,639.81 32,572.87 47.81 Gross profit (loss) 37,921.66 48,269.14 50,608.13 48,605.39 50,608.13 74.28 Operating expenses Royalties 0.00 0.00 1,279.35 1,577.55 1,635.26 1,577.55 1,635.26 2.40 Utilities 0.00 0.00 810.70 923.19 944.96 923.19 944.96 1.39 Operating materials 0.00 0.48 5,178.95 5,179.52 5,180.11 5,180.65 5,181.39 7.60 Selling and G&A Labor 0.00 14.51 1,401.37 1,714.48 1,775.08 1,714.48 1,775.08 2.61 General & administrative and other costs 485.12 1,940.48 2,495.48 2,495.48 2,495.48 2,495.48 2,495.48 3.66 Construction train and operations 0.00 939.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Total operating expenses 485.12 2,894.73 11,165.85 11,890.21 12,030.88 11,891.34 12,032.17 17.66 EBITDA (485.12) (2,894.73) 26,755.81 36,378.93 38,577.25 36,714.06 38,575.97 56.62 Depreciation 0.00 5.86 10,298.47 10,305.12 10,307.49 10,309.42 10,309.72 15.13 Interest 334.88 5,599.23 8,899.49 7,725.25 6,429.40 5,233.23 4,186.59 9.44 Net income (loss) before taxes $ (820.00) $ (8,499.82) $ 7,557.85 $ 18,348.55 $ 21,840.35 $ 21,171.40 $ 24,079.66 $ 32.05 Cummulative $ (820.00) $ (9,319.82) $ (1,761.97) $ 16,586.58 $ 38,426.94 $ 59,598.34 $ 83,677.99 Production in BBLs 533,064 657,312 681,360 657,312 681,360 Production Days 266 328 340 328 340 14

Debt Assumptions Nominal 2,000 Diesel Fuel Facility i-rate 7.0% Sensitivity Analysis Matrix Commit Fee 0.5% Term in Mnths 120 Diesel Price/BBL $ 126.00 PIK Period 27 Naphtha Price/BBL $ 105.00 Payments Quarterly ($000s, except Per BBL) Financing Conditions Feed Annual Capacity Operations 340 Days Levered Condition Description Capex Funding Equity Debt Gas Cost Revenue Operating EBITDA IRR Commit % % /MSCF Expenses Capex Base + 10% $ 234,353 $ 248,000 40% 60% $ 2.00 $ 83,181 $ 31,865 $ 51,316 20.9% Capex Base + 10% $ 234,353 $ 248,000 40% 60% $ 3.00 $ 83,181 $ 38,474 $ 44,707 17.4% Capex Base + 10% $ 234,353 $ 249,000 40% 60% $ 4.00 $ 83,181 $ 45,083 $ 38,098 13.8% Capex Base + 10% $ 234,353 $ 252,000 40% 60% $ 5.00 $ 83,181 $ 51,692 $ 31,489 9.9% Capex Baseline $ 213,048 $ 226,000 40% 60% $ 2.00 $ 83,181 $ 31,385 $ 51,796 23.6% Capex Baseline $ 213,048 $ 226,000 40% 60% $ 3.00 $ 83,181 $ 37,995 $ 45,186 20.0% Capex Baseline $ 213,048 $ 226,000 40% 60% $ 4.00 $ 83,181 $ 44,604 $ 38,577 16.1% Capex Baseline $ 213,048 $ 228,000 40% 60% $ 5.00 $ 83,181 $ 51,213 $ 31,968 12.0% Capex Base -10% $ 191,743 $ 204,000 40% 60% $ 2.00 $ 83,181 $ 30,906 $ 52,275 26.8% Capex Base -10% $ 191,743 $ 204,000 40% 60% $ 3.00 $ 83,181 $ 37,515 $ 45,666 22.8% Capex Base -10% $ 191,743 $ 204,000 40% 60% $ 4.00 $ 83,181 $ 44,124 $ 39,057 18.7% Capex Base -10% $ 191,743 $ 204,000 40% 60% $ 5.00 $ 83,181 $ 50,734 $ 32,447 14.5% Capex Base -10%, Debt 70% $ 191,743 $ 206,000 30% 70% $ 2.00 $ 83,181 $ 30,906 $ 52,275 29.3% Capex Base -10%, Debt 70% $ 191,743 $ 206,000 30% 70% $ 3.00 $ 83,181 $ 37,515 $ 45,666 24.6% Capex Base -10%, Debt 70% $ 191,743 $ 206,000 30% 70% $ 4.00 $ 83,181 $ 44,124 $ 39,057 19.9% Capex Base -10%, Debt 70% $ 191,743 $ 208,000 30% 70% $ 5.00 $ 83,181 $ 50,734 $ 32,447 14.8% Capex Base -20%, Debt 75% $ 170,438 $ 184,000 25% 75% $ 2.00 $ 83,181 $ 30,427 $ 52,754 36.1% Capex Base -20%, Debt 75% $ 170,438 $ 184,000 25% 75% $ 3.00 $ 83,181 $ 37,036 $ 46,145 30.4% Capex Base -20%, Debt 75% $ 170,438 $ 184,000 25% 75% $ 4.00 $ 83,181 $ 43,645 $ 39,536 24.6% Capex Base -20%, Debt 75% $ 170,438 $ 186,000 25% 75% $ 5.00 $ 83,181 $ 50,254 $ 32,927 18.6% 15 Representative of Ethane Case

How Would a GTL plant work next to an NGL Plant? 16

Marcellus Region NGL Plant Data Name Plant Inlet Ethane Stream Vapor Fraction 1.0000 1.0000 Temperature degf 110.0 120.0 Pressure psia 855 115 Flow LbMole/Hr 21,961 1,373 Flow Lb/Hr 450,621 40,946 Density Lb/ft3 3.4330 0.5824 Mol Weight 20.5192 29.8293 Viscosity cp 0.0134 0.0104 Std Gas Flow MMscfd 200.01 12.50 Sufficient for 2,285 BBL/Day of GTL Nitrogen Mol % 0.190% 0.000% CO2 Mol % 0.000% 0.000% Methane Mol % 78.980% 2.427% Ethane Mol % 13.870% 96.862% Propane Mol % 4.460% 0.711% ibutane Mol % 0.440% 0.001% nbutane Mol % 1.060% 0.000% ipentane Mol % 0.240% 0.000% npentane Mol % 0.300% 0.000% nhexane Mol % 0.460% 0.000% 17

Comparing Natural Gas and Ethane as GTL Feedstocks Natural Gas: Ethane (Net-back to Plant): 9,700 SCF of C1 = 1 BBL of GTL 159.6 Gallons of C2 = 1 BBL of GTL @ $2/MSCF feedstock costs = $ 19.40 Per BBL @ $.15/Gallon feedstock costs = $ 23.94 Per BBL @ $3/MSCF feedstock costs = $ 29.10 Per BBL @ $.20/Gallon feedstock costs = $ 31.92 Per BBL @ $4/MSCF feedstock costs = $ 38.80 Per BBL @ $.25/Gallon feedstock costs = $ 39.90 Per BBL @ $5/MSCF feedstock costs = $ 48.50 Per BBL @ $.30/Gallon feedstock costs = $ 47.88 Per BBL 18

For more information about GTL and EFT please visit our website: www.emergingfuels.com Mark Agee VP Business Development magee@emergingfuels.com 19

Questions? 20