OPENDSS SIMULATIONS ON KAUPINRINNE LV-NETWORK

Similar documents
Impact of electric vehicle charging on low-voltage grids and the potential of battery storage as temporary equipment during grid reinforcement

UNIVERSITY OF SWAZILAND MAIN EXAMINATION, DECEMBER 2014

USAGE OF ACCUMULATION TO SUSTAIN THE DAILY DIAGRAM OF ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION IN PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER PLANT

PLUG-IN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE IMPACTS ON A CENTERAL CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL DISTRIBUTION CIRCUIT. A Thesis. presented to

Impacts of Large-Scale Penetration of Electric Vehicles in Espoo Area

Determination of the integration and influencing potential of rapid-charging systems for electric vehicles in distribution grids

Developing tools to increase RES penetration in smart grids

Pretest Module 24 Three-phase Service Entrance

Electric Vehicles Coordinated vs Uncoordinated Charging Impacts on Distribution Systems Performance

Recommended Procedures

Custom Power Solar Radian Battery Energy Storage System

Sensitivity Analysis of Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity of Distribution Circuits

Hot-spot Scenarios of Electric Vehicles on LV Grid including Statistics and Effect of Decentralized Battery Storage

Introduction. Systems Specifications

CHAPTER 3 TRANSIENT STABILITY ENHANCEMENT IN A REAL TIME SYSTEM USING STATCOM

Impacts of Fast Charging of Electric Buses on Electrical Distribution Systems

9/16/2010. Chapter , The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS. 2010, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Planning of electric bus systems

Impact of electric vehicles on the IEEE 34 node distribution infrastructure

IMPACTS OF PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE ON RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM USING STOCHASTIC AND SENSITIVITY APPROACH

3.1 Overview of ATCO Electric s URD System Design

/12/$ IEEE. M. Bashir M.Sc student, Student Member, IEEE Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Mashhad, Iran

EH2741 Communication and Control in Electric Power Systems Lecture 3. Lars Nordström Course map

Distribution Line Transformer / Secondary

3.2. Current Limiting Fuses. Contents

Technical Series, Edition 16

Indoor electrical installation

Models: PMG A and PMG P

Impact Analysis of Fast Charging to Voltage Profile in PEA Distribution System by Monte Carlo Simulation

LOCAL VERSUS CENTRALIZED CHARGING STRATEGIES FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES IN LOW VOLTAGE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS

STOCHASTIC ESTIMATION OF FEEDER-SPECIFIC DISTRIBUTED GENERATION (DG) HOSTING CAPACITY

Static Voltage Stability Investigations on a Part of a Transmission Grid

A Novel Hybrid Smart Grid- PV-FC V2G Battery Charging Scheme

4-Day Power System Analysis, Coordination, System Studies

Interconnection System Impact Study Report Request # GI

Each of these factors, as they apply to the selection of Types CLE and CLS current limiting fuses, is briefly outlined on the following pages.

tests Partial discharge level from day 1 10 pc Insulation 24 kv : impulse tested at 125 kv Insulation 36 kv : impulse tested at 170 kv, 200 kv indeed.

Utilizing Analytics to Model Distribution System Losses with Smart Grid Data

Outdoor Power Transmission & Distribution

Oncor Electric Delivery Distributed Storage and Microgrid Demonstration Projects

Analyses of the grid resistance measurement of an operating transformer station

EDS FUSE RATINGS AT DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATIONS

APPLICATION OF HIGH-RESOLUTION DOMESTIC ELECTRICITY LOAD PROFILES IN NETWORK MODELLING. A CASE STUDY OF LOW VOLTAGE GRID IN DENMARK - PAPER 415 -

N Daily Weekly Monthly Every 3 months. Every 6 months 1 Remove any materials not related

MeteorCalc SL. MeteorCalc SL is a CAD plugin for designing street lighting networks.

Switchgear and Distribution Systems for Engineers and Technicians

University of California, San Diego Cal (IT) 2 Technical Assignment #2. Brian Smith

Feasibility of Electric Propulsion for Semi-submersible Heavy Lift Vessels

Algorithm for Management of Energy in the Microgrid DC Bus

EPRI s Utility Direct DC Fast Charger Development, Testing, Demonstration. Arindam Maitra IWC Meeting March 28, 2012

CHAPTER 3. Basic Considerations and Distribution System Layout

Network service fees. Caruna Oy

DEVELOPING TALENT GROWING VENTURES OPENING MARKETS. CCRE Policy Forum. Paul Murphy, Nov 24, Our Future Matters

Georgia Transmission Corporation Georgia Systems Operations Corporation

CHAPTER V RESIDENTIAL WIRING

PV Grid Integration Research in the U.S.

POW ER EN G IN EER S, L LC

PROTECTION OF THE BRANCH CIRCUIT

Solar Power Switchgear & Energy Storage Renewable Energy Systems

Deliverable D7.3 Report on large scale impact simulations

Published for electrical engineers by EPOWERENGINEERING and available at The ABC s of Overcurrent Coordination

Distribution System Analysis Tools for Studying High Penetration of PV with Grid Support Features. Raja Ayyanar

ECEN 667 Power System Stability Lecture 19: Load Models

694 Electric Machines

TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS

Power Balancing Under Transient and Steady State with SMES and PHEV Control

CIS-IEEE 2017 Conference Renewable Energy Session Renewable Energy s Impact of Power Systems

EE 456 Design Project

Y9. GEH2.3: FREEDM Cost Benefit Analysis based on Detailed Utility Circuit Models

Modeling Distribution System Impacts of Solar Variability and Interconnection Location

Managing the renewables challenge in secondary distribution networks. Tim Spearing, Product Marketing Manager Lucy Electric, United Kingdom

That s how compact transformer protection is today. The customer newsletter of Kries-Energietechnik

Case No. 5 Sequential Motor Dynamic Acceleration Simulation ETAP TS V&V Case Number TCS-TS-181

Reactive power support of smart distribution grids using optimal management of charging parking of PHEV

ABB solar inverters Product portfolio

PES Cook Islands KEMA Grid Study Final Report

Single phase pole mounted. 11kV. Electrical Engineer KEU ID#:

Maximum temp. rise in oil by 40 thermometer above design ambient (deg C) specified time Short circuit rating (Sec) for As per IS 2026

THE THREE VOLTAGE LEVEL DISTRIBUTION USING THE 1000 V LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM

Renewable Energy & Storage Best Practice at TPL and Issues Faced. Murray Sheerin Power Generation Manager, Tonga Power Limited.

ELG4125 Themes of Course Projects

Hardware Testing of Photovoltaic Inverter Loss of Mains Protection Performance

Figure 1. Two and Three-phase MagneX.

SIRFN Capability Summary European Distributed Energy Resources Laboratories (DERlab) e. V.

Analysis of 440V Radial Agricultural Distribution Networks

POWER GENERATION&DISTRIBUTION

Initial Project and Group Identification Document. Senior Design I EEL Off-Grid Clean Energy Power Generation

Fuel Efficient Power Plant Featuring Variable Speed Generation Systems for DP Drilling Units

Electric Vehicle Grid Integration Research Analyzing PHEV Impacts on Distribution Transformers in Hawaii

MEDIUM VOLTAGE DIN Fuse-Links

New Panelboard for Lot H, EV Charger Energization, Las Positas College. Scope of Work and Technical Specifications

Intelligent Fault Analysis in Electrical Power Grids

Industrial Contactors CTX 3 3P 185A - 800A

Small wonder. Station service voltage transformers for small power requirements

CHAPTER 5 ROTOR RESISTANCE CONTROL OF WIND TURBINE GENERATORS

Generator Interconnection System Impact Study For

ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION

Engineering Dependable Protection

ABB in Wind &Integration of renewables

NORDAC 2014 Topic and no NORDAC

Transcription:

- 1 - OPENDSS SIMULATIONS ON KAUPINRINNE LV-NETWORK Table of Contents Introduction... 1 The Model... 2 General description of the modelled network... 2 Model composition... 3 Simulations... 4 Power flow with symmetrical loadings... 4 Power flows with asymmetrical loadings... 6 Power flow with asymmetrical generation... 9 Daily simulations... 10 Introduction This document contains demonstration simulations with OpenDSS on a single LV-network model. The goal of these simulations is to show what kind of simulations can be easily run on OpenDSS when the system asymmetry is considered. The network itself is modelled as symmetrical in respect to impedance values of lines and the asymmetry in the system is considered to be due to asymmetry in network loads and generation. The three key points examined here are: 1. Voltage asymmetry on LV network side 2. Overloads due to asymmetric loading currents 3. Asymmetry in power drawn from MV-network The model is composed so that it can be easily attached to the previously created MV-network model if enough LV-network data is supplied to model other LV-networks.

- 2 - The Model General description of the modelled network The modelled network is Kaupinrinne LV-network which feeds the residential area of Kaupinrinne near the centre of Orivesi city. The network has 101 customers on 51 connection points, most of them being detached houses. LV network is fed by 500 kva Dyn11 distribution transformer and the network lines are mostly underground cables. The residential area is circled red on the map excerpt on figure 1. The customer connection points are circled green on the circuit plot on figure 2, the blue circle is the distribution transformer. Letter O next to connection point stands for detached house, the letter K stands for apartment house and the letter A stands for auxiliary connection (here this is streetlight connection). Figure 1: Kaupinrinne residential area

- 3 - Figure 2: Circuit plot of the LV-network Model composition For these simulations the MV network feeding the system is modelled with 20 kv voltage source and series impedance (Thevenin equivalent). The source feeds LV-network through distribution transformer modelled with OpenDSS s Transformer object. The general composition of the model is depicted in figure 3.

- 4 - Figure 3: Model composition On the LV side each customer connection point is modelled with a symmetrical 3-phase load and 3 single phase loads for asymmetrical simulations. Also, every customer connection point has an attached voltage recording element. Simulations Power flow with symmetrical loadings First simulations are done with only symmetrical loads computed from the measured customer loads. Two simulations are run, first with mean loading and secondly with maximum loading. The mean load is computed as average of all measured hourly loads per customer and the maximum loading is computed by selecting the highest hourly load from the measured period. The simulation results are shown on figure 4 and the buses on circuit plot are depicted in figure 5 (bus 0 is the distribution transformer primary).

- 5-1.02 1 0.98 0.96 Voltage Profiles - Kaupinrinne LV grid VOLTAGE (MEANLOAD) pu VOLTAGE (MAXLOAD) pu VOLTAGE 0.94 0.92 0.9 0.88 0.86 0.84 0 2 4 6 8 10121417192123252729313335373941434547495254565860626466687072 BUS Figure 4: LV-network voltages with symmetrical loads

- 6 - Figure 5: Buses on circuit plot Power flows with asymmetrical loadings In these simulations additional 3.3kW 1-phase load to symmetrical average load is attached to each customer connection point. In first simulation all 1-phase loads are attached to 1 st system phase and in the second simulation the system phase is selected at random. The simulation results for first case are shown on figure 6.

- 7 - VOLTAGE 1.05 3P Voltage profile w\1-phase loads on 1st phase Phase1 Phase2 Phase3 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 BUS Figure 6: 3-phase voltages of LV-network with 1-phase loads on 1st phase Connecting all the 1-phase loads to same phase causes an overload in the circuit. In table 1 an excerpt of the OpenDSS s overload report is shown. Table 1: Excerpt from OpenDSS's overload report Element Terminal I1 %Normal %Emergency I2 %I2/I1 I0 %I0/I1 Line.1764586 1 107 101 91.8 72.8 68 72.8 68 For these simulations the normal ampacity of a line is determined by maximum current allowed by line fuses. The emergency ampacity is the maximum current of a conductor type. After inspecting the phase currents of the overloaded line (with OpenDSS command: Visualize Currents Line.1764586) it s apparent that the overload is caused by current (252.5 A) in phase 1. The maximum normal current is 250 A. Overloaded line is show on circuit plot on figure 7.

- 8 - Figure 7: Overloaded line on circuit plot In the next simulation same loads as in previous simulations are attached to the system. Yet in this simulation the connection phase of an individual asymmetrical load is selected at random. The system voltages after simulation are depicted on figure 8

- 9 - VOLTAGE 1.05 3P Voltage profile w\1-phase loads on random phases Phase1 Phase2 Phase3 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 BUS Figure 8: 3-phase voltages of LV-network with 1-phase loads on random phase Power flow with asymmetrical generation In this simulation 3.7 kw single phase generation is attached to each connection point with detached house load ( see fig. 2 ). Mean loads are used for symmetrical base load. Each generation is attached to the 1 st system phase. System voltages are depicted on figure 9.

- 10 - VOLTAGE 3P Voltage Profiles w\ single phase generation Phase1 Phase2 Phase3 1.1 1.08 1.06 1.04 1.02 1 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.92 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 BUS Figure 9: 3-phase voltages of LV-network with 1-phase generation on 1st phase Daily simulations In these simulations a 24 h period is chosen during which the power drawn from the MV-network is recorded and examined. First a simulation with just the symmetrical load is run. Time period for the simulation is from 1.10. 12:00 to 2.10. 12:00. Simulation results are shown on the figure 10.

- 11 - Apparent power drawn from MV-network Power (kva) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 S1 (kva) S2 (kva) S3 (kva) 0 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Hour Figure 10: Power drawn from the MV-network with base loading Next, single phase EV charging loads are attached to the network. In this simulation the charging load is 3.3 kw with charging time between 6-8 h. The charging is determined to begin between 16 pm to 19 pm. So, the load profile for EV charging beginning at 17 pm and lasting for 7 hours would be as depicted on figure 11. When all EV loads are summed the total additional load would be as on figure 12. The charging time, the beginning hour, and the connection phase for each individual load is selected at random (with criterions above). The power drawn from MV-network with these loads is shown on figure 13.

- 12 - Figure 11: An example of an EV charging load profile

- 13 - Figure 2: Sum of EV charging loads 160 140 120 Apparent power drawn from MV-network Power (kva) 100 80 60 40 20 S1 (kva) S2 (kva) S3 (kva) 0 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Hour Figure 3: Power drawn from the MV-network with base loading and additional EV loads In the last simulation a 1-phase solar generation is attached to each detached house. The size of the generation unit is same for each connection point and the connection phase is selected at random. The simulation period is changed to 2.6 00:00 to 2.6 24:00. On figure 14 the power drawn without 1-phase generation is depicted.

- 14 - Apparent power drawn from MV-network 90 80 70 Power (kva) 60 50 40 30 S1 (kva) S2 (kva) S3 (kva) 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Hour Figure 4: Power drawn from the MV-network with base loading Every generation unit follows the generation curve depicted on figure 15 during the simulation. The power drawn from MV-network is shown on figure 16. Generation profile Power (kw) 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Hour P_gen Figure 5: the generation profile of a single generation unit

- 15 - Apparent power drawn from MV-network 90 80 70 Power (kva) 60 50 40 30 S1 (kva) S2 (kva) S3 (kva) 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Figure 6: Power drawn from the MV-network with base loading with additional generation