Sustainable transport better infrastructure - The Danish Government s vision for green infrastructure

Similar documents
Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Project Overview. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Mobilitätsbeirat Hamburg 01. July 2015

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

Bus The Case for the Bus

Kreis Ostholstein, the Fehmarnbelt Committee, municipalities, tourist attractions and transport enterprises in the Fehmarnbelt Region

Pametno gospodarenje cestovnom infrastrukturom Smart Management of Road Infrastructure Christophe Nicodème, ERF

The Indian Infrastructure Industry

Strategic Plan

Designing and financing resilient transport infrastructure

Technological Viability Evaluation. Results from the SWOT Analysis Diego Salzillo Arriaga, Siemens

Maintaining the current-, and developing future Performance Management

Factors affecting the development of electric vehiclebased car-sharing schemes

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

The deployment of public transport innovation in European cities and regions. Nicolas Hauw, Polis

Efficient & Sustainable City Bus Services

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

Ex-Ante Evaluation (for Japanese ODA Loan)

SAA Financial Results 2008/09. Building on Restructuring

Data Challenge Goethe University Frankfurt Mobility options in smart cities. DB Systel GmbH Norbert Schaffitzel T.IVP 21 Frankfurt 19/04/2018

INTEGRATION OF WINDPOWER IN THE ENERGY MARKET

How to make urban mobility clean and green

URBAN FUTURE SOME LEADS FOR LEEDS. Véronique Ramadi, Leeds,

The future is electric!

The Role of the Infrastructure Investments in the New EU Road Mobility Package

The Impact of Digital Twin on Transportation Infrastructure Monitoring & Maintenance

Oslo - Carbon-neutral by 2030? Sture Portvik Project manager Agency for Urban Environment City of Oslo Nordic EV Summit 2017

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

Electric City Transport Ele.C.Tra project. Challenges of New Urban Mobility Models Towards EU 2020 Targets

Sustainable Transportation. Presented by Rob Fleming, Chief Administrative Officer Ministry of Transportation

Energy Innovation Emporium. Transport. Chair: Prof. John Nelson, Centre for Transport Research University of Aberdeen

Decarbonization of the Transport Sector and Urban Form

E-mobility in The Netherlands

The future is electric! Experiences from Oslo. Sture Portvik Manager Electro mobility Agency for Urban Environment City of Oslo

TEMPLATE OF THE NATIONAL REPORT

GPP in Copenhagen - Sharing experiences on Sustainable Mobility and GPP. Webinar, EU NGO Network on GPP, Jan 2018

Global Perspectives of ITS

10 Th Urban Mobility Conference / CODATU XVII Innovative Funding For Urban Mobility Case study: RATP & Ile-de France mobility

Planning for Sustainable Urban Transport Systems in India - Strengths and Weaknesses

Labelling Smart Roads DISCUSSION PAPER 4/2015

The Health Benefits of Public Transport. Vince Hills Business Development Officer - Nexus

BMW GROUP DIALOGUE. HANGZHOU 2017 TAKE AWAYS.

Christos Koulouris CEO, Invision Consulting S.A.

Bus and coach transport for greening mobility

The Century of Cities

New York, We ve Got a Problem!

Krakow, 16 September Laurence A. Bannerman President EPA

Amman Green Policies Projects and Challenges. Prepared by: Eng. Sajeda Alnsour Project coordinator Sept. 20, 2017

Transport An affordable transition to sustainable and secure energy for light vehicles in the UK

FENEBUS POSITION PAPER ON REDUCING CO2 EMISSIONS FROM ROAD VEHICLES

INFODAY Brussels, June 23,2009 Griet Van Caenegem, Directorate G Components and Systems Unit Microsystems

The Swedish Government Inquiry on Smart Grids

V2G and V2H The smart future of vehicle-to-grid and vehicle-to-home. September 2016

Oslo The EV Capital. Agency for Urban Environment City of Oslo Sture Portvik

Practical Issues in Market Design

Curbing emissions and energy consumption in the transport sector how can we deal with it in Warsaw 2012 Annual POLIS Conference

PROMOTION OF EFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN MALAWI BY CHIMWEMWE KAUNDA

Mobility of Gurugram & NCR-

Electric Vehicle Adoption in the South African Context

Mobility on Demand, Mobility as a Service the new transport paradigm. Richard Harris, Xerox

IMPACT OF AUTOMATED HIGHWAY SYSTEMS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH.

Future mobility - Challenges of driverless vehicles and shared economy

The deployment of public transport innovation in European cities and regions. Nicolas Hauw, Polis

Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Transport Gautrain Update. Jack vd Merwe (Pr. Eng) CEO: Gautrain Management Agency 25 August 2009

NOTAT. Mopeds - Risk of serious injury or death Delnotat III. Transport-, Bygnings- og Boligministeriet. knallert og lille motorcykel.

ELECTRIC VEHICLE ROADMAP FOR MALAYSIA

History of Subway in Kyoto

Challenges and solutions for transport in Norway

* Presented at 2011 World Bank Transport Forum, March Jaehak Oh. Director, Global Research Office for Green Growth & Convergence

UfM Ministerial Declaration on Energy

Planning of the HSR Network

Renewables in Transport (RETRANS)

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

The Future is Bright! So how do we get there? Council of State Governments West Annual Meeting August 18, 2017

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

RIETI BBL Seminar Handout

! " # $ % # & " ' % ( ' ) "

Accelerating Electric Recharging Infrastructure Deployment in Europe

EMC Automotive Event Woerden, 13 en 14 november ENEVATE Outlook. Edwin Bestebreurtje FIER Automotive. FIER Automotive

AlphaElectric Get the full potential from your emobility.

Competition in long distance train service between Eastand Westdenmark. Kontorchef Lasse Winterberg 9. februar 2011

Energy Efficiency Transport Sector

A CO2-fund for the transport industry: The case of Norway

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

ADP!AALTO FULL SPEED AHEAD! A presentation to the CEO of Harley Davidson 1/10/2019. Matti Karjalainen Patrick Timmer Lauri Hanninen Tommi Bergstrom

When Grids Get Smart - ABB s Vision for the Power System of the Future

Is there an alternative solution?

Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia and the Pacific FACT SHEET

Electric Scooters. Ignoring one key solution to sustainable urban/ metropolitan transport?

New York s success was built on a transportation system that was fast, safe, and fair. It s time to return to those principles.

How a smarter grid enables smart mobility and how smart mobility enables smarter cities!

Impact of Copenhagen s

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Innovation Center for Mobility and Societal Change. Vision, mission and projects

EMBARQ, the WRI Center for Sustainable Transport

Shaping the Future of Railway Industry Student Engagement Event 20 th September 2016

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

UITP PTx2 Strategy: What Role for Busses and Recommendations from UITP Istanbul Bus Declaration

Kathrine Wilson-Ellis Strategic Safety Team. Phil Proctor Future Technologies

MOBILITY AS A SERVICE

Urban Transport Development Investment Program (RRP MON 39256) SECTOR ROAD MAP

VIETNAM TRAFFIC SAFETY FOR 2 WHEELERS: CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES. Trinh Thu Ha Deputy Chief Office National Traffic Safety Committee Vietnam

Transcription:

Sustainable transport better infrastructure - The Danish Government s vision for green infrastructure Maja Caroee Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Hawaii at Manoa May 5th 2009

Presentation overview: Project overview Green innovations Greener vehicular traffic Public transport and cycling Better railway network Better roads Noise Benefits Social Economic Environmental Challenges

Project overview This is a long-term green transport plan It introduces: Green taxes Intelligent road pricing More and better public transport Intelligent traffic systems (ITS) Making Denmark a test bed for new green transportation technologies Greater regard for the value of the nature

Project magnitudes The Government s green transportation plan will require enormous investments The investment will be more than DKK 150 billion ($27 billion) up to year 2020 The 2 large scale projects, the Fixed Fehrmarn Belt Link and Metro Circle Line in Copenhagen accounts for approx DKK 60 Billion ($11 billion) This leaves DKK 90 billion ($16 billion) for investments in roads, railways etc.

Funding The 2 large scale projects are being funded partly by tolls and outside the Finance and Appropriations Act The remaining DKK 90 billion ($16 billion) is being funded by a new Infrastructure Fund The Infrastructure Fund is among other things financed accordingly: The DKK 6 billion ($1 billion) proceeds from the Scandlines sales DKK 9 billion ($1.6 billion) in funds from A/S The Great Link (This will prolong the payback period with 5-6 years) Savings in operations according to the new signal systems Within the free scope of the Finance and Appropriations Act

Rolling investment program Since it is not possible to decide which projects should be built from now till 2020 the government wants a rolling investment program Every other year current construction projects must be evaluated On the basis of analysis and decision-making criteria Every 4 years decisions must be made to which projects will be subject to new analysis EIS analysis to determine the effect all the projects have Social-economic effects must also be determined

Green innovations Today the transport sector accounts for 25% of Denmark s CO2 emissions This trend must be reversed Some of the objectives are: Greener vehicular traffic (green car tax) More public transport and cycling Better railway network Better roads Noise

Greener vehicular traffic Fundamental restructuring of the taxation of cars It will be cheaper to buy a energy-efficient car Intelligent traffic systems Information on alternative routes and speed limit control will even out the flow of traffic Smart road pricing More expensive to drive during daytime in the city than evenings in the country The overall taxation can not rise Road pricing must be offset by a lower registration tax

More public transport and cycling Public transportation must be a viable alternative to cars Reduction in travel times The hour plan Extensive network of routes Trains running on time Repairing and replacing rail track and bridges New modern signal systems Interfaces between different forms of transport must be improved Better parking facilities near train stations Investments in exclusive cycle lanes Better parking facilities near train stations

Better railway network The hour plan Copenhagen-Odense: 1 hour Odense-Aarhus: 1 hour Aarhus-Aalborg: 1 hour Reduces travel time from Copenhagen to Aalborg by 1.5 hour This plan will move 10.000 passengers daily from cars to trains The fixed Fehmarn Belt Link Reduce travel time between Copenhagen-Hamburg with 1.5 hour Clear capacity on the railway network between Zealand, Jutland and Funen

Continued A continued repair and replacement of rail tracks Fewer delays New signal systems Fewer delays Increased safety More efficient operation Better passenger information Higher speed High speed trains are a necessary to fulfill the hour plan Electrification of the railway network Electric trains are more CO2 efficient than diesel trains Will be carried out when the replacing of the signal system is finished

Better roads With the improvement in public transport the goal is to move the commuters from cars to public transport and thereby reduce congestion After the move of the commuters the government will address the traffic problems where they are worst The capacity will be improved at bottlenecks Existing roads will be upgraded Intelligent traffic systems will be integrated ITS can exploit the usage of the roads by 5-10% Can reduce accidents by 35% Better access to harbors New roads will be built to connect Denmark

Noise Use of noise reducing pavement This can reduce the noise pollution as much as a vehicle reduction of 50% Funds for noise barriers Development and design of noise barriers Both visual and noise reducing efficiency Continue to lobby for reduction in noise levels from vehicles Continue to lobby for new ideas on EU/international level

Social benefits It connects Denmark better both in traffic and environmental terms The plan will promote economic growth and high mobility Danes has always been dependent on high mobility Many work in a different part of Denmark than where they live Better public transportation Cars are expensive in Denmark, this is very good for students and pensioners who cannot afford a car It addresses health issues Promote cycling Reduces the CO2 emissions Better infrastructure will reduce the no. of accidents

Economic benefits Reduction in congestion It is estimated that in the Copenhagen area congestion causes a DKK 6 billion cost to the society yearly ($1.1 billion) Delays in the railway system also causes major economic losses As of 2010 1% of the Danish GDP is invested in research This is approx DKK 20 billion yearly ($3.6 billion) This will promote interaction between public research and private companies Stimulate economic growth An economic kick-start in a time of financial crisis

Environmental benefits Reduction in CO2 emissions Both by moving commuters from cars to public transport and greener cars ITS by informing commuters of congestion and improving flows Smart road pricing Reduction in noise pollution

Challenges It is the Government s vision for the Danish infrastructure Negotiations with the opposition Not ambitious enough? Experts believe the plan is not ambitious enough to cope with the infrastructure challenges of the future Funding Car industry against road pricing Taking money from A/S the Great Link

Continued Congestion many years to come It is a long term plan, many solutions are in the future but they are needed now Forgets busses as a part of public transport The plan primarily focuses on the rail but forgets the part of the country there is not connected to the railway system Environmental groups are afraid the plan will result in more roads They want more focus on public transport Local opposition against some of the projects The environment is important therefore unpopular solutions has been chosen some places

Thanks for your attention