Review of iterative design approach Mass Estimating Relationships (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis

Similar documents
Mass Estimating Relations

Mass Estimating Relations

Mass Estimating Relations

Preliminary Cost Analysis MARYLAND

Cost Estimation and Engineering Economics

Suitability of reusability for a Lunar re-supply system

SPACE PROPULSION SIZING PROGRAM (SPSP)

Subjects: Thrust Vectoring ; Engine cycles; Mass estimates. Liquid Bipropellant rockets are usually "gimballed" to change the thrust vector.

Fly Me To The Moon On An SLS Block II

Lunar Surface Access from Earth-Moon L1/L2 A novel lander design and study of alternative solutions

Modern Approach to Liquid Rocket Engine Development for Microsatellite Launchers

CONCEPT STUDY OF AN ARES HYBRID-OS LAUNCH SYSTEM

Parametric Design MARYLAND

Ares V: Supporting Space Exploration from LEO to Beyond

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

AN OPTIMIZED PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR Soyuz/ST

Vehicle Reusability. e concept e promise e price When does it make sense? MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Vehicle Reusability

Artemis: A Reusable Excursion Vehicle Concept for Lunar Exploration

Lunar Cargo Capability with VASIMR Propulsion

ReachMars 2024 A Candidate Large-Scale Technology Demonstration Mission as a Precursor to Human Mars Exploration

CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION TO LM-3C

ASABOOSTER CD005 Conceptual Design Study for an Asaspace Launch Capability Version 0.04

Transportation Options for SSP

EuLISA. <Chemical Propulsion> Internal Final Presentation ESTEC, 8 July Prepared by the ICPA / CDF* Team. (*) ESTEC Concurrent Design Facility

Rocket 101. IPSL Space Policy & Law Course. Andrew Ratcliffe. Head of Launch Systems Chief Engineers Team

ENERGIA 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : K Series : K-1/SL-17 Version : 4 strap-ons

Development of a Low Cost Suborbital Rocket for Small Satellite Testing and In-Space Experiments

Technical Assessments of Future European Space Transportation Options

USA FALCON 1. Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310)

Ares I Overview. Phil Sumrall Advanced Planning Manager Ares Projects NASA MSFC. Masters Forum May 14, 2009

Centurion: A Heavy-Lift Launch Vehicle Family for Cis- Lunar Exploration

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

AMBR* Engine for Science Missions

Comparison of Return to Launch Site Options for a Reusable Booster Stage

Design Rules and Issues with Respect to Rocket Based Combined Cycles

Modern Liquid Propellant Rocket Engines

AAE STAGING. Ch3 46

AME 436. Energy and Propulsion. Lecture 6 Unsteady-flow (reciprocating) engines 1: Basic operating principles, design & performance parameters

Architecture Options for Propellant Resupply of Lunar Exploration Elements

Launch Vehicle Engine Selection Using Probabilistic Techniques

A Scalable Orbital Propellant Depot Design

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

Welcome to Aerospace Engineering

Development of a Nitrous Oxide Monopropellant Thruster

Page 2. (a) (i) Show that during the change AB the gas undergoes an isothermal change.

Space Propulsion. An Introduction to.

NASA s Choice to Resupply the Space Station

Preliminary Design Review

Rocketry and Spaceflight Teleclass Webinar!

SOYUZ-IKAR-FREGAT 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : SOYUZ Series : SOYUZ Version : SOYUZ-IKAR SOYUZ-FREGAT

The SABRE engine and SKYLON space plane

Analysis of Launch and Earth Departure Architectures for Near-Term Human Mars Missions

Performance Evaluation of a Side Mounted Shuttle Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle for Lunar Exploration

Ares V Overview. presented at. Ares V Astronomy Workshop 26 April 2008

From HOTOL to SKYLON British Spaceplane Programmes: Past, Present and Future

AFRL Rocket Lab Technical Overview

SMILE - Small Innovative Launcher for Europe

TURBOPROP ENGINE App. K AIAA AIRCRAFT ENGINE DESIGN

Loads, Structures, and Mechanisms Design Project ENAE 483 Fall 2012

A Model-Based Systems Engineering Approach to the Heavy Lift Launch System Architecture Study

lights on, down 2 ½ 40 feet, down 2 ½ Kickin up some dust 30 feet, 2 ½ down faint shadow

IAC-15-C4.3.1 JET INDUCER FOR A TURBO PUMP OF A LIQUID ROCKET ENGINE

THE FALCON I LAUNCH VEHICLE Making Access to Space More Affordable, Reliable and Pleasant

Development of Main Propulsion System for Reusable Sounding Rocket: Design Considerations and Technology Demonstration

Development of Low Cost Propulsion Systems for Launchand In Space Applications

6. The Launch Vehicle

Lessons in Systems Engineering. The SSME Weight Growth History. Richard Ryan Technical Specialist, MSFC Chief Engineers Office

35 th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit June 1999 Los Angeles, California

Hovercraft

Lecture 4. Lab 8 Check valve and pilot-operated check valves Lab 9 Flow divider. Update: Identifying lab objectives Review: Metering/Bleed-off

Investigations of Future Expendable Launcher Options

Size of Boost-Phase Region of Ballistic Missile Flight

AME 436. Energy and Propulsion. Lecture 6 Unsteady-flow (reciprocating) engines 1: Basic operating principles, design & performance parameters

High Performance Green Propulsion (HPGP): A Flight-Proven Capability and Cost Game-Changer for Small and Secondary Satellites Aaron Dinardi

Typical Rocketry Exam Questions

Atlas V Launches the Orbital Test Vehicle-1 Mission Overview. Atlas V 501 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL Space Launch Complex 41

CONTENTS Duct Jet Propulsion / Rocket Propulsion / Applications of Rocket Propulsion / 15 References / 25

MISSION OVERVIEW SLC-41

Innovative Small Launcher

Media Event Media Briefing Arif Karabeyoglu President & CTO SPG, Inc. June 29, 2012

Utilizing Lunar Architecture Transportation Elements for Mars Exploration

European Lunar Lander: System Engineering Approach

THE BIMESE CONCEPT: A STUDY OF MISSION AND ECONOMIC OPTIONS

Case Study: ParaShield

CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design Final Examination. Instructor: Prof. Dr. Serkan ÖZGEN Date:

EXTENDED GAS GENERATOR CYCLE

New H-IIA Launch Vehicle Technology and Results of Maiden Flight

Multi-Purpose Space Tug Vehicle

Week 8 Thursday (3/3)

NASA s Space Launch System Marks Critical Design Review

John Klaus Robert Cooper Thilina Fernando Zoe Morozko

Appenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis

Studying the Positioning Accuracy

CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION TO LM-2E

Preliminary Design Study of Main Rocket Engine for SpaceLiner High-Speed Passenger Transportation Concept

OMOTENASHI. (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor)

Prototype Development of a Solid Propellant Rocket Motor and an Electronic Safing and Arming Device for Nanosatellite (NANOSAT) Missions

Hypersonic Airplane Space Tether Orbital Launch (HASTOL) System

ARIANEGROUP ORBITAL PROPULSION ROBERT-KOCH-STRASSE TAUFKIRCHEN GERMANY

Transcription:

Review of iterative design approach (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis 2005 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu

The Spacecraft Design Process

Akin s Laws of Spacecraft Design - #3 Design is an iterative process. The necessary number of iterations is one more than the number you have currently done. This is true at any point in time.

Vehicle-Level Preliminary Design - 1st Pass Single Stage to Orbit (SSTO) vehicle 5000 kg payload LOX/LH2 propellants Isp=430 sec δ=0.08 ΔV gi r = e sp = 0.1127 λ = r δ = 0.0327 M 0 = M L = 153,000 kg λ M i = δm 0 = 12, 240 kg M p = M ( 0 1 r) =135,800 kg

System-Level Estimation Start with propellant tanks (biggest part) LOX/LH2 engines generally run at mixture ratio of 6:1 (by weight) LH2: 19,390 kg LOX: 116,400 kg Propellant densities ρ LOX = 1140 kg m 3 ρ LH2 =112 kg m 3

LOX Tank MERs Mass of Tank M LOX Tank ( kg) = 0.0152M ( LOX kg) + 318 Mass of Insulation M LOX Insulation kg ( ) =1.123 kg m 2

LOX Tank Design Mass of LOX=116,400 kg M LOX Tank ( kg) = 0.0152( 116,400) + 318 = 2087 kg Need area to find LOX tank insulation mass - assume a sphere V LOX Tank = M LOX / ρ LOX =102.1 m 3 r LOX Tank = V 1 LOX 3 = 2.90 m 4π / 3 M LOX Insulation ( kg) =1.123 kg 2 A LOX Tank = 4πr LOX m 2 =105.6 m 2 ( 105.6 ) m2 = 119 kg

LH2 Tank MERs Mass of Tank M LH2 Tank ( kg) = 0.0694M ( LH 2 kg) + 363 Mass of Insulation M LH2 Insulation kg ( ) = 2.88 kg m 2

LH2 Tank Design Mass of LH2=19,390 kg M LH2 Tank ( kg ) = 0.0694( 19,390) + 363 = 1709kg Again, assume LH2 tank is spherical V LH2 Tank = M LH2 / ρ LH2 = 346.3 m 3 r LH2 Tank = V LH 2 4π / 3 M LH2 Insulation kg 1 3 = 3.46 m ( ) = 2.88 kg A = 4πr 2 LH2 Tank LH 2 m 2 = 150.2 m 2 ( 150.2 ) m2 = 433 kg

Current Design Sketch Masses LOX Tank 2089 kg LOX Tank Insulation 1709 kg LH2 Tank 119 kg LH2 Tank Insulation 433 kg

Other Tankage MERs Storable Propellants (RP-1, N 2 O 4, N 2 H 4 ) M Storables Tank Small tank (liquids) M Small Liquid Tank ( kg) = 0.316 M Storables kg Small tank (pressurized gases) M Small Gas Tank [ ( )].6 ( kg) = 0.1M ( contents kg) ( kg) = 2M ( contents kg)

Low-Cost Return to the Moon Boost Module Propellant Tanks Gross mass 23,000 kg Inert mass 2300 kg Propellant mass 20,700 kg Mixture ratio N 2 O 4 /A50 = 1.8 (by mass) N 2 O 4 tank Mass = 13,310 kg Density = 1450 kg/m 3 Volume = 9.177 m 3 --> r sphere =1.299 m Aerozine 50 tank Mass = 7390 kg Density = 900 kg/m 3 Volume = 8.214 m 3 --> r sphere =1.252 m Space Systems Laboratory University of Maryland

N 2 O 4 Tank Sizing Low-Cost Return to the Moon Need total N 2 O 4 volume = 9.177 m 3 Single tank Radius = 1.299 m Mass = 94.2 kg Dual tanks Radius = 1.031 m Mass = 62.2 kg (x2 = 124.3 kg) Triple tanks Radius = 0.900 m Mass = 48.7 kg (x3 = 146.2 kg) Space Systems Laboratory University of Maryland

Other Structural MERs Fairings and shrouds Avionics Wiring M ( Fairing kg) = 13.3 kg M Avionics M Wiring m 2 ( kg) = 10 M 0 kg [ ( )] 0.361 ( kg) =1.058 M ( 0 kg) l 0.25

Fairing Analysis Payload Shroud Area 51.74 m 2 Mass 688 kg Intertank Fairing Area 126.1 m 2 Mass 1677 kg Aft Fairing Area 107.7 m 2 Mass 1433 kg

Avionics and Wiring Masses Avionics M Avionics Wiring ( kg) = 10[ 153, 000 kg] 0.361 = 744 kg M Wiring ( kg) = 1.058 153, 000 ( 16.95 m) 0.25 = 840 kg

Propulsion MERs Liquid Pump-Fed Rocket Engine Mass M Rocket Engine ( kg) = 7.81 10 4 T( N) + Solid Rocket Motor 3.37 10 5 T( N) A e A t + 59 M Motor Casing = 0.135M propellants Thrust Structure Mass M Thrust Structure ( kg) = 2.55 10 4 T( N)

Propulsion MERs (continued) Gimbal Mass M Gimbals Gimbal Torque τ Gimbals kg P 0 (Pa) ( ) = 237.8 T(N).9375 ( N m) = 990,000 T(N) P 0 (Pa) 1.25

Propulsion System Assumptions Initial T/mg ratio = 1.3 Keeps final acceleration low with reasonable throttling Number of engines = 6 Positive acceleration worst-case after engine out Chamber pressure = 1000 psi = 6897 kn Typical for high-performance LOX/LH2 engines Expansion ratio A e /A t =30 Compromise ratio with good vacuum performance

Propulsion Mass Estimates Rocket Engine Thrust (each) Rocket Engine Mass (each) M Rocket Engine ( kg) = 7.81 10 4 324,900 Thrust Structure Mass M Thrust Structure T( N) = m 0g( T / W) 0 n engines = 324,900 N ( ) + 3.37 10 5 324, 900 ( ) 30 + 59 = 373 kg ( kg) = 2.55 10 4 ( 324,900) = 497 kg

First Pass Vehicle Configuration

Mass Summary - First Pass Initial Inert Mass Estimate 12,240 kg LOX Tank 2087 kg LH2 Tank 1709 kg LOX Insulation 119 kg LH2 Insulation 433 kg Payload Fairing 688 kg Intertank Fairing 1677 kg Aft Fairing 1433 kg Engines 2236 kg Thrust Structure 497 kg Gimbals 81 kg Avionics 744 kg Wiring 840 kg Reserve - Total Inert Mass 12,543 kg Design Margin -2.4 %

Modifications for Second Pass Keep all initial vehicle sizing parameters constant Pick vehicle diameter and make tanks cylindrical to fit Redo MER analysis

Effect of Vehicle Diameter on Mass Margin 0.2000 0.1500 0.1000 0.0500 0.0000-0.0500-0.1000 0 2 4 6 8 Vehicle Diameter (m)

Effect of Mass-Optimal Diameter Choice Vehicle has L/D of 25.2 - severe complications from structural dynamics Mass margin goes from -2.4% to +18.3% Decreased volume for rocket engines in aft fairing Infeasible configuration

Effect of Diameter on Vehicle L/D 120.0 100.0 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 Vehicle Diameter (m)

Second Pass Vehicle Configuration

Mass Summary - Second Pass Initial Inert Mass Estimate 12,240 kg 12,240 kg LOX Tank 2087 kg 2087 kg LH2 Tank 1709 kg 1709 kg LOX Insulation 119 kg 133 kg LH2 Insulation 433 kg 547 kg Payload Fairing 688 kg 689 kg Intertank Fairing 1677 kg 669 kg Aft Fairing 1433 kg 585 kg Engines 2236 kg 2236 kg Thrust Structure 497 kg 497 kg Gimbals 81 kg 81 kg Avionics 744 kg 744 kg Wiring 840 kg 985 kg Reserve - - Total Inert Mass 12,543 kg 10,960 kg Design Margin -2.4 % +11.7 %

Modifications for Iteration 3 Keep 4 m tank diameter Change initial assumption of δ iteratively, with resulting changes in m 0 and m i, to reach 30% mass margin

Vehicle-Level Preliminary Design - 3rd Pass Single Stage to Orbit (SSTO) vehicle 5000 kg payload LOX/LH2 propellants Isp=430 sec δ=0.08655 ΔV gi r = e sp = 0.1127 λ = r δ = 0.0261 M 0 = M L = 191,300 kg λ M i = δm 0 = 16,560 kg M p = M ( 0 1 r) =169,800 kg

Third Pass Vehicle Configuration

Mass Summary - Third Pass Initial Inert Mass Estimate 12,240 kg 12,240 kg 16,560 kg LOX Tank 2087 kg 2087 kg 2530 kg LH2 Tank 1709 kg 1709 kg 2046 kg LOX Insulation 119 kg 133 kg 162 kg LH2 Insulation 433 kg 547 kg 672 kg Payload Fairing 688 kg 689 kg 689 kg Intertank Fairing 1677 kg 669 kg 669 kg Aft Fairing 1433 kg 585 kg 585 kg Engines 2236 kg 2236 kg 2708 kg Thrust Structure 497 kg 497 kg 622 kg Gimbals 81 kg 81 kg 100 kg!! Avionics 744 kg 744 kg 807 kg Wiring 840 kg 985 kg 1146 kg Reserve! - - Total Inert Mass 12,543 kg 10,960 kg 12,740 kg Design Margin -2.4 % +11.7 % +30 %

Mass Budgeting Estimates Budgeted Margins Initial Inert Mass Estimate 16,560 kg 16,560 kg 3826 kg LOX Tank 2530 kg 2910 kg 380 kg LH2 Tank 2046 kg 2354 kg 307 kg LOX Insulation 162 kg 187 kg 24 kg LH2 Insulation 672 kg 773 kg 101 kg Payload Fairing 689 kg 793 kg 104 kg Intertank Fairing 669 kg 769 kg 100 kg Aft Fairing 585 kg 673 kg 88 kg Engines 2708 kg 3115 kg 407 kg Thrust Structure 622 kg 715 kg 93 kg Gimbals 100 kg 115 kg 15 kg Avionics 807 kg 928 kg 121 kg Wiring 1146 kg 1318 kg 172 kg Reserve!! 1913 kg! 1913 kg Total Inert Mass 12,740 kg 16,560 kg