Response of the Road Haulage Association to Leeds City Council. Air Quality Public Consultation Feb 2018

Similar documents
Response of the Road Haulage Association to Transport for London s Consultation. Changes to the Ultra Low Emission Zone and Low Emission Zone.

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Leeds City Council. Air Quality Public Consultation August August 2018

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Southampton City Council. Southampton Clean Air Zone Consultation

Accommodating freight in Clean Air Zones

Improving the air we breathe A Clean Air Zone for Birmingham. Birmingham City Council

Intelligent Phasing for freight in Clean Air Zones

Proposals for an Ultra Low Emission Zone

RHA NOx Emission Assessment 2018

Response of the Road Haulage Association to the Scottish Government. Removal, Storage & Disposal of Vehicles Regulations.

ULTRA LOW EMISSIONS ZONE CONSULTATION LONDON COUNCILS RESPONSE

L O W E M I S S I O N CITY

We note the range of possible interventions identified in the consultation paper.

London Transport Policy, Planning and Strategies

Low Emission Vehicle Policy Development in London

Newcastle/Gateshead Low Emission Zone Feasibility Study

Innovation in London. Policy approaches to mobility management and sustainable travel. Transport for London

The Low Emission Zone

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Transport for London. New proposals to improve Air Quality.

Response ID ANON-K85H-GTWT-6

GUIDE FOR VAN DRIVERS

Clean Air Zones: An Approach for Local Authorities

Introduction to the Ultra Low Emission Zone

THE ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTS RoSPA RESPONSE TO THE DRIVING STANDARDS AGENCY CONSULTATION PAPER

The London Low Emission Zone. Nick Fairholme Head of the LEZ Transport for London

London s Congestion Charge. Introduction to the Scheme and its Principal Impacts

THE CHARGING OF THE USE OF ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE

The Central London Congestion Charge

WATFORD LOCAL PLAN PART 2. Review of Car Parking Policy and Standards. Evidence Base. February 2012

Low Emissions Towns and Cities Programme

GOVERNMENT CLEAN AIR STRATEGY

Congestion Charging in London

Upgrading City Buses to Reduce NOx Emissions

EU initiative for CO2 emissions reduction in Europe

LoCITY Low Emission Commercial Vehicle programme

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Welcome to the Birmingham Clean Air Roadshow

Central London Congestion Charging Scheme. 17 March 2005 Impacts - 9 th Annual Conference. Michele Dix Director Congestion Charging Division

committee report General Permitted Development Order SPT response to consultation

Aging of the light vehicle fleet May 2011

A Guide to the London Emission Zone

Personalized Solutions. Personalized Service.

Brexit time for politics to grow up. The reality of 30 March no deal

1. How has traffic congestion changed in London in recent years? Are there differences in the amount, time, type and/or location of congestion?

Risk Management of Rail Vehicle Axle Bearings

NCTCOG Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Working Group Conference Call. EDAR Pilot Project

The Low Emission Zone. Samantha Kennedy Strategy Manager: LEZ

Reducing deaths and injuries in the home

CIVITAS SMILE Introduction of a Low Emission Zone in Norwich. Andy Watt Head of City Development Services

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to 2025 Sourcing Lower Sulphur Products

Respecting the Rules Better Road Safety Enforcement in the European Union. ACEA s Response

Factors Influencing PPO Uptake

Section 5: Food waste collection vehicles

Response to the Department for Transport & Department for Infrastructure, Northern Ireland Consultation Paper

Poland drives e-mobility!

London 2050 Infrastructure Plan

ONE YEAR ON: THE IMPACTS OF THE LONDON CONGESTION CHARGING SCHEME ON VEHICLE EMISSIONS

Advantages of public transport

Procurement notes for councils (Scotland)

Hybrid and Retrofitted SCRT bus fleets. Simon Carlisle Engineering Director First West Yorkshire

Tackling Transport Emissions National information hub to support local action

Terms of Reference (ToR) Trade & Traceability Standing Committee (T&T SC)

#14. Evaluation of Regulation 1071/2009 and 1072/ General survey COMPLETE 1 / 6. PAGE 1: Background

Impact of Copenhagen s

TfL Managing London s Roads. Glynn Barton, Head of RSM Outcomes Delivery, Transport for London. Copyright 2016 TRL Ltd

Bus The Case for the Bus

LAEI 2013 Non-road transport emission estimates

Road safety time for Europe to shift gears

Public Transport Proposals including: Subsidised Bus Services, Concessionary Travel and Community Transport Draft Passenger Transport Strategy 2016

January 8, ATTN: VW Settlement. Dear Mr. Phillips:

Steve Rubin, Managing Director, Finance and Support Services. It is requested that the Board or Harbor Commissioners approve the following actions:

Reducing CO 2 emissions from vehicles by encouraging lower carbon car choices and fuel efficient driving techniques (eco-driving)

Operating bus or coach services abroad if there s no Brexit deal

Nick Molden, Massimo Fedeli 26 September AIR ALLIANCE Vehicle eco-labelling for new and old vehicles

Caltex Australia comments on Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme White Paper February 2009

CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

! " # $ % # & " ' % ( ' ) "

Selected insights into road transport trends Ian Kershaw Managing Director, Ricardo Strategic Consulting

PROMOTING SOOT FREE PUBLIC TRANSPORT

Birmingham NO X reduction Champions project

Consumer attitudes to low and zero-emission cars

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

EU Road Transport Strategy ECG Conference Brussels 20 Oct. 2017

LOGISTICS CASE STUDY

Fuels Roadmap for 2020 and beyond - implications for future strategy

Integrating transport (buses)

Brief on the PCFV Used Vehicle Working Group. Partnership for Clean Fuels and Vehicles (PCFV)

RESPONSE TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT S CONSULTATION PAPER

What action is expected to take place in the foreseeable future in ADRs with regard to seat belts on school buses?

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Commissioning Director for Environment. Officer Contact Details Lisa Wright; Summary

Travel Action Plan De Montfort University

Review of the SMAQMD s Construction Mitigation Program Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices February 28, 2018, DRAFT for Outreach

Environmental Impact of Taxis Is there a Business Case for Hybrids. Dr James Tate, Institute for Transport Studies

Emissions Legislation

Zorik Pirveysian, Air Quality Policy and Management Division Manager Policy and Planning Department

A Transformational Approach to Energy Supply. September 2016 Gail Scholes, Jo Gilbert

City Transfer Stations: Loading Services and Fees

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

PROMOTING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC AND OTHER LOW EMISSION VEHICLES

Low Emission Zone Vehicle Registration Form

Transcription:

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Leeds City Council Summary Air Quality Public Consultation 2018 27 Feb 2018 1. Leeds City Council is consulting businesses (locally, regionally and nationally), commuters and those living in the wider Leeds region about proposals for a Clean Air Zone in Leeds. 2. Leeds City Council state that if it is to meet air quality standards, it is likely that a charging Clean Air Zone will need to be introduced. According to government frameworks, meeting the standards has to happen as soon as possible, by the end of 2019 at the latest. 3. The proposed Leeds Clean Air Zone would charge buses, HGVs, taxis and diesel private hire vehicles that fail to meet Euro VI emission standards to entering the city all day, every day. Any lorry not meeting the Euro VI standard will be charged 100 per day. (Euro VI has been the emission standard for new lorries only since 2014 all older lorries will have to pay). Background about the RHA 4. The RHA is the leading trade association representing road haulage and distribution companies, which operate HGVs as profit centres. Our 7,000 members, operating near to 100,000 HGVs, range from single-truck firms to those with thousands of vehicles. These companies provide essential services on which the people and businesses of the UK depend. 5. We proactively encourage a spirit of entrepreneurism, compliance, profitability, safety and social responsibility. We do so through a range of advice, representation and services, including training. 6. We would like to thank Leeds City Council for the consultation and the opportunity to comment on the issues raised. 7. The online consultation only provides limit scope for businesses to address the issues. We have answered the relevant questions in the survey in full rather than the narrow responses allowed in the survey. Version 1 Page 1

Broad RHA view 8. The RHA and our members have serious concerns about the Leeds and other Clean Air Zone proposals. As currently configured the proposals will lead to business closure and disruption to road haulage and other businesses. In simple terms the mix of the timeline, the standards applied the simultaneous application of Clean Air Zones in many cities, the charging levels and the possibility of haulage operators being charged in more than one city each day will be catastrophic especially for smaller businesses. 9. Policy makers should note that every home, flat, factory or office built requires tonnes of furniture, bricks, concrete and wood. All Leeds residents need feeding and resupplying and their waste dealing with on a daily basis, and this has to be done by road vehicles. Road freight is essential for the city to function. 10. Goods also need to be moved in the most efficient road vehicles to minimise congestion and air quality impacts. The most efficient vehicles are large goods vehicles. 11. Over recent decades, UK air quality has improved significantly thanks to concerted action at all levels. Total UK emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) fell by almost 70% between 1970 and 2015 and by over 19% between 2010 and 2015. Poor air quality is a serious environmental risk to public health in the UK and investing in cleaner air and doing even more to tackle air pollution are priorities for the RHA membership. 12. The RHA supports clean air, Euro VI technology is superb but the industry is unable to keep pace with the unrealistic time frames set by this consultation. Compliance with the changes will be impossible for many businesses due to the lack of Euro VI Lorries, the absence of a lorry retrofit option, and the limited opportunity for redeployment of Euro IV and V vehicles outside Leeds. Implementing a tax in this way on the sector will destroy some businesses and will make no material difference to air quality. 13. Road Haulage is a minor contributor to the air quality problem, about 10% in 2013 according to TfL. Since then, as Euro VI lorries have come on stream, we estimate that NOx emissions will have fallen (without any Clean Air Zone incentives) by 40% at the end of 2019. 14. At the end of 2019 just over 50% of lorries will be Euro VI, around 26 % will be Euro V. The RHA position has been that all Clean Air Zones need to be, and can be, phased in a way that supports clean air objectives without major disruption to small businesses and their customers. In particular that we need to accommodate Euro V lorries for longer than is currently planned (either exempting Euro V from charges initially or having a much lower charge, say 10, to the end of 2023 at least). Version 1 Page 2

15. The Consultation answers of the RHA are relevant only to that which impacts on the Road Haulage sector. Consultation Questions Like many online survey consultations the ability to respond is very limited. Following the online questions sometimes requires a respondent to give an inaccurate answer as no suitable response is available. The Leeds online survey is better than many that we have seen, but the problem is still in evidence. Therefore we have answered the questions in full. The numbering is the RHA s, the order is the same as the original survey produced by Leeds. Question 1: What impact do you feel a charging Clean Air Zone would have on reducing air pollution? Answer: By charging only lorries and busses then we do not believe a charging CAZ will have the desired impact on air quality as per Q4 congestion is the key, this may mean having to charge cars and vans to enter. It can be seen from the London example that implementing a charge is not having the desired effect on air quality and what is needed is urgent action to tackle congestion. Question 2: What impact do you feel a charging Clean Air Zone would have on local businesses? Answer: There are 143 road haulage operators based within the proposal zone, with the majority of these having less than 5 vehicles. It is well known to us that these operators will have vehicles that are non-compliant at Euro VI Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGV) and therefore will have to pay on a daily basis irrespective of whether delivering into the city. We do not have the ANPR data to review the amount of HGV s entering the zone, however the bulk will again be small operators and thus liable to pay any charge. It will not be a viable option for many of these small operators to pay the charge as the cost cannot be passed on; there are little profit margins in the Road Haulage Sector and we believe that many small businesses operating HGV s will have no alternative to but to cease to trade. We have solid evidence that retrofitting in our sector is not available and will not be available or of any use by the start of any charging CAZ. Euro VI vehicles are in very high demand and there is insufficient in the market place to meet current demand. The HGV second hand market for Euro VI HGV s is now out of proportion and highly inflated due to Version 1 Page 3

the insistence of Euro VI being the only acceptable vehicles allowed within a CAZ without charge. In essence charging all businesses operating HGV s will have a devastating effect on the local business community, we will suggest some alternatives in our recommendations. Question 3: When setting the cost of a daily charge, which of the following objectives should Leeds City Council prioritise? (Tick one only) Answer: - Minimising the economic impact upon businesses and vehicle owners Question 4: Leeds' Clean Air Zone would be similar to London's Low Emission Zone (LEZ), which also imposes a defined boundary which the most polluting vehicles are charged for entering. With this in mind, do you think the London LEZ charges for vehicles that do not meet minimum emission requirements are too much, too little, or about right for Leeds' Clean Air Zone? 100 Charge? (Tick one only) Answer: - Too much Question 4: Do you believe that improving air quality within the shortest possible timescale should be a priority for Leeds? By Leeds, we mean the Leeds area rather than just the city centre? Please see answers to other questions and our broad view, the RHA believe that congestion is the main cause of air pollution and imposing a charge on trucks and busses which are essential movers of people and freight is the wrong direction for the authority to take. Cars and vans are the main cause of congestion; localised freight is being moved from Lorries due to possible charges along with many other legislative changes to the haulage sector and an influx of cars and small vans making parcel deliveries adding to the congestion issue. Tackling congestion during rush hours and school start and end times would have a major impact, free school transport and even more radical free public transport would tackle the over use of cars and have the required impact on Air Quality. Q5: Under current proposals, private vehicles entering the Clean Air Zone would not be charged even if the vehicles do not meet minimum emissions requirements. To what extent do you agree with this approach? Answer: As per Q4 we do not agree with this point, we understand the reasoning behind it, however by not charging cars congestion will not be effected, all that will be seen is re-routing of lorries that by-pass the City and congestion and air quality not effected. Version 1 Page 4

RHA Other Comments: 16. We have stated that a charging CAZ would have a devastating effect on the local business community, we have evidence from local businesses based in the area that they will be left with no option other than bankruptcy if the CAZ is introduced as suggested and HGV s are charged at 100 per day if not Euro VI compliant. 17. We do not believe that DEFRA and Local Authorities have taken into account businesses that operate HGV s in numerous cities on a daily basis and in fact could be charged three or more times a day. 18. We have pointed out to DEFRA and the Department for Transport that although clearly stated as an option in the Air Quality Plan and Clean Air Zone Strategy there is not a RETROFIT option for the heavy goods vehicle market. We attend CVRAS, LowCVP and Energy Savings Trust groups on a regular basis and have pointed out this fact. Further, there are no plans for any Lorry retrofit options to be funded - unlike the bus and coach sector. 19. Euro VI Lorries are in very high demand by the very large operators. We have evidence of the resale market being out of kilter due to the fact that Euro VI is in such demand and prices have increased upto threefold for a second hand lorries putting them out of reach of the smaller business. 20. A lorry in most cases will have a commercial and operational life span of about 12 years (this is increased for specialist vehicles) - it is important to understand how the vehicle fleet has changed and will continue to change over time. The RHA assessment of the changes in the lorry fleet, by emission standard over time given stable rates of change is shown in table 1. Table 1. Changes in the lorry fleet, by emission standard over time Version 1 Page 5

21. As can be seen in the above data, the fleet of modern Euro V vehicles remains substantial until after well after 2020. Undertaking limitation on the movement of Euro IV and V in the near term will be highly disruptive for operators, especially small operators. 22. At the end of 2020 45% of lorries will fall in scope of Clean Air Zone charging if a Euro VI only approach is adopted. As non Euro VI lorries will have to be used in substantial numbers the Clean Air Zone charges will in effect be a tax on many freight movements, a tax that will impact most severely on smaller and medium sized businesses. Recommendations of the RHA 23. There is limited opportunity to redeploy the Euro IV and V fleet due to widespread adoption of clean air zone solutions being mandated by central Government. There is no viable retrofit, given this, ideally we would advise that Euro V is used as the base standard until the end of 2023. This will give businesses more time to make the required adjustments. 24. If there is no other option than a charge below Euro VI, then the RHA recommend an Intelligent Phasing of the charges, charging older more polluting Euro III vehicles up to 100 but Euro IV less and Euro V even less - possibly 10 for Euro V until the end of 2023. This approach is likely to give the optimum air quality result from the road haulage sector. CT Snape Deputy Policy Director Date: 27 February 2018 Version 1 Page 6