The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Similar documents
Public Transportation Investment Background Data

Public Transportation

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-one Articulated Hybrid Diesel Expansion and Replacement Buses

Starting and Growing Rural Vanpool Programs: From Financing to Vehicle Procurement

APPROVE VANPOOL VEHICLE SUPPLIER BENCH CONTRACTS

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

USDOT CMAQ Program. Southeast Diesel Collaborative Annual Conference September, 2017

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-two Double Deck Buses for Increased Passenger Capacity, Bus Replacement and Service Expansion

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Recommend to Board. Final Action

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

FISCAL YEAR MARCH 2014 FINANCIAL RESULTS

Regional Transportation District. Dave Genova Interim General Manager and CEO August 21, 2015

TRANSIT DRIVES PENNSYLVANIA MOBILITY FACT SHEET

Small Urban & Rural Transit Center

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

Washington State Road Usage Charge Assessment

The Regional Municipality of York. Purchase of Six Battery Electric Buses

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Colorado Association of Ski Towns August 26, 2016

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

CAPITAL AREA RURAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 31, 2007 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER 2006 (ADVANCE)

Energy Technical Memorandum

WASHINGTON STATE ROAD USAGE CHARGE ASSESSMENT

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Commuter Transit Service Feasibility

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Chapter 6 - Capital Improvement Program

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACT BOOK

ARC TAQC. June 12, 2014

PARTIAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FFY

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

State Safety Oversight Program

Transit Fares for Multi-modal Transportation Systems

ACTION: ESTABLISH LIFE-OF-PROJECT BUDGET FOR UP TO 100 NEW COMPO BUSES

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

2011 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report

Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH 2 JU) Frequently Asked Questions

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Case Study: City of San Diego

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Valley Metro: Past, Present and Future. September 11, 2014

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

FISCAL YEAR MARCH 2015 FIRST HALF FINANCIAL RESULTS. New Mazda Demio

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

LADOT Enhancing Transit Services through Competitive Bidding

Motorcoach Census. A Study of the Size and Activity of the Motorcoach Industry in the United States and Canada in 2015

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ROLES

RE: Comments on Proposed Mitigation Plan for the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust

FISCAL YEAR MARCH 2018 FIRST QUARTER FINANCIAL RESULTS

Mauritius 1.1 Background

RNG Production for Vehicle Fuel. April 4, 2018

Business Member Business Development Committee AGENDA

Our mission is to be the best public service transporter for passengers in the city of Kigali using modern, clean and safe urban city buses.

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Office of House Republican Whip, Stan Saylor

Branch Edmonton Transit

MOTION No. M Purchase of Five 40-foot Buses PROPOSED ACTION

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

ACT 89: THE FOUNDATION TO REBUILD SEPTA FOR THE FUTURE JOSEPH M. CASEY GENERAL MANAGER

METRO TRANSIT a n n ua l re p o r t. madison, wisconsin // mymetrobus.com

Memorandum. To: The Arlington County Board Date: June 29, 2018 From: Subject:

Submission to the Transport and Public Works Committee s inquiry into the operations of toll roads in Queensland

King County Metro. Sustainably and equitably achieving a zero-emission fleet

Sustainability SFMTA Path to Platinum

Planning for Future Mobility In a Performance-Based World Steven Gayle, PTP

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Agreement to Purchase Compressed Natural Gas Articulated Buses. Staff Report

Infrastructure Investment How Much Do You Need?

Transportation Electrification: Reducing Emissions, Driving Innovation. August 2017

10 Th Urban Mobility Conference / CODATU XVII Innovative Funding For Urban Mobility Case study: RATP & Ile-de France mobility

Proposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1

Figure 1 Unleaded Gasoline Prices

FISCAL YEAR MARCH 2015 FIRST QUARTER FINANCIAL RESULTS. Mazda Roadster 25 th Anniversary Model

High Quality Service through Continuous Improvement st Quarter Performance Report

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

CNG Strategy/Overview

Transcription:

The Case for Business investment in Public Transportation

Introduction Public transportation is an enterprise with expenditure of $55 billion in the United States. There has been a steady growth trend over the past three decades, with long-term economic and social trends (population, energy, public choice) all pointing to an even more prominent future standing. Since 1980, the number of fixed-guideway systems has grown exponentially with a bevy of projects positioned to become the next generation of investment. Investment from all levels of government is on a long-term upward trend, and public support for more and better public transportation, as measured through ridership and public approval of transit ballot measures (a 73 % approval rate over the past 12 years) continues to increase. This report focuses on issues critical to private investors as they consider investments or future expansion into the public transportation industry. Investment questions typically focus on public transportation financing sources, process, and dependability, finding targets for investments, and funding needs. State of the Transit Industry - Growth in Ridership, Service and Funding The public transportation industry has recently experienced significant growth; in ridership, funding levels, and services provided. America s public transit systems will carry more than 10 billion passenger trips for the sixth consecutive year in 2011. Public Transportation Will Carry Over 10 Billion Passenger Trips for Six Straight Years Figure 1 Billions of Unlinked Passenger Trips 11 10 9 8 7 6 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 Source: APTA Public Transportation Fact Book 2011 Since 1980 The Number of Rail Systems Has Increased More Than Two and One-Half Times Figure 2 n 1980 n 1990 n 2000 n 2010 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Commuter Rail Systems Heavy Rail Systems Source: APTA Public Transportation Fact Book 2011 Appendix A Light Rail Systems The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation 1

The number of public transit agencies operating rail systems has grown continuously over the past three decades. In 1980 there were only 10 commuter rail systems by 2010 there were 28. Four new heavy rail systems opened between 1980 and 2010. The number of light rail systems increased five-fold, from seven in 1980 to 35 in 2010. Rail transit systems, including automated guideway transit and inclined planes, now provide public transportation service in 32 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Sources of Public Transportation Funds Figure 3 Sources of Operating Funds, 2009 Sources of Capital Funds, 2009 Fact Existing systems have also expanded during those years, extending and adding routes. From 1980 through 2010, ridership on commuter rail systems increased 67 percent, on heavy rail systems ridership increased 66 percent, and on light rail systems ridership increased 250 percent. Most public transportation systems are self-governing stand-alone entities within some form of local or regional government structure. Most have their own Board of Directors and operate in a mode of quasi-private enterprise. A large portion of transit agency budgets are covered through dedicated revenue sources that are, in comparison to many industries, stable and include a mix of local, state and federal resources. Federal 8% State 25% Directly Generated 12% Fares 32% Local 23% State 14% Local 13% Federal 42% Directly Generated 31% Diverse and Stable Source of Public Transportation Funding Public transportation funding is provided from a mix of federal, state, local and transit agency sources. In total, transit industry revenues reached $57.1 billion in 2009, of which $38.9 billion was for agency operations and $18.2 billion for agency capital programs. This report focuses primarily on capital programs. Public transit revenue is generated from four primary sources: Directly Generated Revenues are acquired by the transit agency through their own activities including fares, taxes levied by the system and other revenue, including advertising, concessions, parking revenues or private contributions. Local Revenues are taxes or fees generated by a local or regional government. Examples include local sales, income, property or other local taxes. State Revenues are taxes or fees imposed by a state government. Federal Revenues originate from federal government funds. Most operating revenue is generated by the agency or local tax revenue sources, with only 33 percent of funds coming from state or federal sources. Capital funds are generated from a more diverse range of resources with the federal government providing more than 40 percent of these funds. A relatively large portion of funds are generated from dedicated revenues with the majority coming from sales taxes. Dedicated revenues are taxes levied with the express purpose of funding public transportation and are, therefore, less susceptible to short-term changes in political support. Dedicated revenues may vary depending on economic conditions. Source: APTA Public Transportation Fact Book 2011 Diverse Funding with Significant Share of Dedicated Funds - Sources of Capital Funds, 2009 Table 1 Year Directly Generated Other Dedicated Source: APTA Public Transportation Fact Book 2011 Federal General Revenue State Dedicated Amount of Funding (Millions of Dollars) General Revenue Local Dedicated 2007 2,280 2,509 5,864 474 1,127 455 1,601 14,310 2008 2,367 3,284 6,954 489 1,657 799 1,895 17,445 2009 4,457 1,157 7,686 653 1,961 952 1,363 18,229 Percent of Annual Total 3-Year Average 18.2% 13.9% 41.0% 3.2% 9.5% 4.4% 9.7% 100.0% Total 2 The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation 3

table 2 Dedicated Revenue by Type of Tax Source for Public Transportation in Urbanized Areas, 2009 Dedicated Operating Revenue (in Millions) Type of Tax Directly Generated State Local Total Percentage of Total Sales Tax 1,653 3,244 3,641 8,539 67% Income Tax 0 857 81 938 7% Public transportation systems are funded by local, regional, state and federal sources. Funding has continued to grow significantly for more than a decade and political support for transit investment continues to increase. Local and regional sales taxes dedicated to investment in public transportation have grown by 275 percent over the past 15 years, and growth has continued even after the economic downturn in 2008. Fact Gasoline Tax 0 600 159 759 6% Property Tax 325 4 392 721 6% Other Tax 231 1,333 233 1,797 14% Total 2,209 6,038 4,507 12,754 100% Source: National Transit Database 2009 Consistent Growth in Funding for Public Transportation Since 1995, capital funding provided by the combined total of directly generated and local sources has increased 180 percent. Federal funds have grown 125 percent and state funds have grown 155 percent. Federal authorizations for the transit program have grown from $5.1 billion in FY 1995 to $10.5 billion in FY 2011. Since 1998 the appropriations have nearly matched the authorization every year. In addition to funds appropriated to the Federal Transit Administration programs, some funds appropriated to Federal Highway Administration programs may be transferred to transit uses at the request of states. Transit projects have competed well for those flexible funds and have received over $17 billion from the program s inception in 1992 through 2010. Since 2009, the flexible funding programs have been supplemented with additional cross-modal discretionary programs such as the TIGER (Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery) program, through which $225 million has been provided from FY 2009 through FY 2011. Including all U.S. DOT sources, transit received $12.2 billion in FY2010. figure 4 : Capital Funding by Source (1995-2009) Millions of U Dollars 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1995 1996 1996 1996 1996 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Fiscal Year Transit Authorization Transit Appropriation Percent of Authorized Funds Appropriated Flexed Funds Transit Appropriation Plus Flexed Funds 2007 8,975 8,975 100.0% 1,023 9,998 2008 9,731 9,492 97.5% 894 10,386 2009 10,338 10,231 99.0% 1,281 11,512 2010 10,508 10,508 100.0% 1,455 11,963 2011 10,529 10,096 95.9% NA NA Source: APTA Primer on Transit Funding, July 2011 Federal Funding 2007 to 2011 Table 3 Federal Assistance State Assistance Local Plus Directly Generated Assistance Source: APTA Public Transportation Fact Book 2011 Appendix A 4 The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation 5

In addition to relatively stable revenue sources, public transportation has generated a high degree of ongoing support from the electorate as demonstrated by the high approval rate for transit ballot measures. Between the years 2000 through 2011, over 73 percent of the transit ballot measures have been approved, with such approval consistent across regions of the country and across party affiliations. Type Capital Expense by Mode and Type of Investment 2009 (Million $) Table 5 Bus Commuter Rail Paratransit Heavy Rail Light Rail Trolley Bus Other Total % of Amount Total table 4 Widespread Political Support for Public Transportation - Local Public Transportation Referenda Approvals Nationwide Year Measures on Ballot Measures Approved Percent Approved 2010 56 43 77% 2009 11 8 73% 2008 47 35 74% 2007 18 12 67% 2006 45 34 76% 5-Year Total 177 132 75% Source Center for Transportation Excellence Guideway 100 1,384 0 2,333 2,534 6 38 6,400 36% Passenger Vehicles 2,439 456 561 1,646 404 14 228 5,748 32% Stations 342 413 6 1,311 358 <1 50 2,481 14% Communication and Information Systems 241 94 84 558 114 2 10 1,103 6% Maintenance Facilities 575 246 38 60 158 <1 14 1,092 6% Fare Revenue Collection Equipment 104 13 5 81 34 <1 1 238 1% Administrative Buildings 160 3 37 16 2 <1 17 234 1% Service Vehicles 39 5 5 40 7 1 <1 96 1% Other 140 137 28 182 30 <1 9 527 3% Total 4,139 2,751 764 6,228 3,647 23 368 17,919 100% Source: APTA Public Transportation Fact Book 2011 Public transportation systems continue to find ways to leverage revenue streams through programs such as the America Fast Forward program in Los Angeles, the Eagle Public Private Partnerships (P3) programs in Denver, and advance construction programs funded through U.S. DOT s TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) program. The Transit Passenger Vehicle Fleet Has Grown Steadily figure 5 180,000 Capital Funding for Public Transportation Supports A Wide Range of Business Sectors Based on the most recent data available (2009), the largest portion of capital expenditures was spent on facility construction (57 percent), including fixed-guideways, stations, administration buildings and maintenance facilities. Purchases for passenger and service vehicles accounted for 33 percent of capital expenditures. Fare revenue collection equipment, communication and information systems, and other capital accounted for the remainder. Transit Passenger Vehicles 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2003 2009 Source: APTA Public Transportation Fact Book 2011 Appendix A 6 The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation 7

The replacement and expansion of the transit vehicle fleet is a significant focus of transit investment. The roadway vehicle fleet for the transit industry exceeds 150,000 with rail cars bringing the total fleet to more than 172,000 passenger vehicles. Two out of three roadway vehicles operated in urbanized areas are buses, with vans representing the majority of the remainder. Among the bus fleet, two out of three buses are approximately 40-feet in length and represent the most significant part of the potential new vehicle market. Public Transportation agencies generally replace vehicles according to guidance provided by the Federal Transit Administration, which for typical 40-foot buses is every 12 years, but varies by vehicle type. Length Active Buses by Length and Mode of Service in Urbanized Areas, 2009 table 7 Mode of Service, Buses Only by Length Bus Demand Response Vanpool and Publico Total Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 46 ft and Longer 3,881 6% 0 0% 0 0% 3,881 5% table 6 Active Transit Roadway Vehicle Fleet in Urbanized Areas, 2009 Type of Vehicle (NTD Categories) Mode of Service, All Vehicles Bus Service Demand Response Vanpool and Publico Total Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Buses 60,507 93% 10,081 30% 10 0% 70,598 61% 42 ft to 45 ft 3,664 5% 3 0% 0 0% 3,667 5% 35 ft to 41 ft 47,098 69% 93 1% 0 0% 47,191 61% 25 ft to 34 ft 8,136 12% 3,658 41% 1 10% 11,795 15% 24 ft and shorter 5,228 8% 5,228 58% 9 90% 10,465 14% Source: National Transit Database 2009 Articulated buses 3,767 6% 0 0% 0 0% 3,767 3% Double decked buses 140 <1% 0 0% 0 0% 140 <1% Vans/taxicab vans 552 1% 16,091 47% 17,196 100% 33,839 29% Taxicab sedan/station wagon/automobiles 7 <1% 7,635 23% 35 <1% 7,677 7% Other 189 <1% 102 <1% 0 0% 291 <1% Total 65,162 100% 33,909 100% 17,241 100% 116,312 100% Source: National Transit Database 2009 Length of Vehicle Transit Roadway Vehicle Fleet by Type and Length in Rural Areas, 2009 table 8 Bus, All Types Cutaway Van Type of Vehicle, Rural Areas Only Automobile, Minivan, and SUV Other Total Total Number Number Number Number Number Number Percent 35 ft and Longer 1,078 12 0 0 53 1,143 5% 25 ft to 34 ft 2,067 2,622 4 3 35 4,731 23% 24 ft and Shorter 620 5,840 4,923 3,574 59 15,016 72% Total, Number 3,765 8,474 4,927 3,577 147 20,890 100% Total, Percent 18% 41% 24% 17% 1% 100% --- Source: National Transit Database, Rural Areas 2009 8 The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation 9

table 9 The market for rail vehicles is less consistent year to year with longer life cycles than typical bus vehicles. Rail vehicles by year-manufactured data are available in the APTA Public Transportation Vehicle Inventory and provide an indication of the relative market size year to year. Rail Vehicles by Year of Manufacture Widespread Interest in Expansion of Transit Through Major Capital Projects The New Starts Program, which funds new capacity transit projects, also represents a significant target of investment for the federal transit program with over $1.5 billion in funding from the federal government in each of the past five years. Typically projects are matched with state and local funding for approximately one-half of the total cost, though the portion of matching funds varies by project. Projects move through various stages of planning, design and construction with a high degree of oversight from the federal government. As shown in Figure 6, many projects continue to move through the New Starts process. From 2011 APTA Public Transportation Vehicle Inventory Vehicle Type 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Commuter Rail Car 24 126 174 154 382 Number of New Start Projects Proposed for Fiscal Year 2012 Figure 6 Heavy Rail Car 382 447 578 281 170 Light Rail Car 48 25 99 150 80 Total 454 598 851 585 632 Source: APTA Public Transportation Vehicle Database 2011 Final Design 11 Full Funding Grant Agreement 10 The data are as of January 1, 2011, hence many vehicles manufactured in 2010 may not yet have been delivered and accepted by agencies and are not included in 2010 numbers. Preliminary Engineering 10 Project Development 15 Fact Public transportation vehicles are manufactured using parts made throughout the United States. Value chain analysis by the Duke University Center on Globalization, Governance and Competitiveness have identified railcar or locomotive original manufacturer facilities located in 15 states and subsystems and parts suppliers in 35 states. Bus original equipment manufacturer facilities were identified in 14 states and subsystems and parts were supplied from locations in 29 states, with a total of 32 states involved in bus manufacturing. Source: Federal Transit Administration Annual Report on New Starts 2012 Transit capital investment is a partnership of continued support from all levels of government. In 2009 the federal government provided 42 percent of transit capital funding, state governments 14 percent, and local government and transit sources 44 percent. This shared support shows that transit investment is a priority at all levels of government. Fact 10 The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation 11

table 10 Year Continued funding for rail transit construction has resulted in the steady expansion of transit rail infrastructure. Rail transit systems have added 1,500 miles of trackage in the past five years. Increased trackage resulted in the opening of new transit systems, as well as the expansion of existing systems to meet growing travel demand. Miles of Transit Rail System Trackage Miles of Track by Mode Commuter Rail Heavy Rail Light Rail Other Rail Total 2009 8,424 2,272 1,636 30 12,363 2008 8.018 2,277 1,538 30 11,865 2007 8,059 2,277 1,493 38 11,868 2006 8,017 2,277 1,464 38 11,796 2005 7,948 2,277 1,385 30 11,640 2004 7,284 2,210 1,321 30 10,845 Source: APTA Public Transportation Vehicle Database 2011 Over the last 15 years public transportation has experienced continuous long-term growth. Long-term growth in demand as shown by increased ridership Long-term growth in investment in facilities as shown by larger vehicle fleets and more rail systems References and Other Sources: Public Transportation Fact Book: The APTA Fact Book is a summary of national total data for the entire transit industry for a single year. Appendix A: Historical Data, provides data for every year as far back as 1902. Appendix B: Transit Agency and Urbanized Area Operating Statistics, ranks transit agencies and urbanized areas by size for six operating statistics. Public Transportation Vehicle Database: The APTA Vehicle Database lists vehicles reported by participating transit agencies for the active fleet, under contract for purchase, and planned purchases. APTA Primer on Transit Funding: The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, and Other Related Laws, FY 2004 Through FY 2011. The Primer describes the amount of funds from federal transit programs, how they can be used, and how they are distributed among transit agencies and states. Annual Report on Funding Recommendations ( New Starts Report ): FTA publishes an annual report outlining the status of various projects being considered for funding under the New Starts program. National Transit Database: A comprehensive source of data collected from transit agencies in urbanized areas which operate 10 or more vehicles produced by FTA. Data is typically released 12-18 months after the end of the reporting period. A less detailed report is also produced for rural area transit systems. Center for Transportation Excellence: The CFTE maintains an complete, up-to-date listing and analysis of all transportation ballot measures throughout the U.S. that include a transit component. Public Transportation Investment Background Data: This APTA Investment Background Data report is the source of the data included in this publication. The Investment Background Data report includes an extensive analysis of transit revenue sources and what transit funds are spent for with descriptions of the availability, quality, and meaning of data from primary sources. Data in this report are updated whenever they are updated in those primary sources. Long-term growth in support: support from the public as shown by the high-rate of referendum approvals to fund transit and support from elected officials as shown by federal, state, regional, and local government s increasing financial support for transit operations and capital investment. 12 The Case for Business Investm ent in public transportation

Printed on recycled paper For further details and updated information, please visit www.apta.com or contact us at: 1666 K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20006-1215 Phone: (202) 496-4800 Fax: (202) 496-4324 This report was developed by the private-sector business members of the American Public Transportation Association. December 2011