U.S. Application No: ,498 Attorney Docket No: ( )

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES

PATENT UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. ET AL.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. INOV A LABS, INC. Requester/ Appellant

USOO582O2OOA United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,820,200 Zubillaga et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 13, 1998

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. ORTHOPEDIATRICS CORP., Petitioner, K2M, INC.

ADJUSTABLE PEDAL ASSEMBLY WITH ELECTRONIC THROTTLE CONTROL RELATED APPLICATION. filed Jan. 26, 1999, U.S. Pat. No. 6,109,241.

od f 11 (12) United States Patent US 7,080,599 B2 Taylor Jul. 25, 2006 (45) Date of Patent: (10) Patent No.:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD BLD SERVICES, LLC. Petitioner LMK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.

Paper 8 Tel: Entered: September 18, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,588,825 B1

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,429,647 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,643,958 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,205,840 B1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,168,973 B2

United States Statutory Invention Registration (19)

USOO5963O14A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,963,014 Chen (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 5, 1999

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,805,593 B2

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Costco Wholesale Corporation Petitioner

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

September 2, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

NOTICE. The above identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

US A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,531,492 Raskevicius (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 2, 1996

Paper Entered: March 17, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,215,503 B2. Appel et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 10, 2012

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,758,066 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,028,376 B2. filed on Jul. 2, 2012, now Pat No. 8,814,763, and a Assistant Examiner Nyca TNguyen

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,469,466 B1

November Jeffrey A. Wong Thomas L. Daugherty Gordon D. Huntzberry NOTICE

NOTICE. The above identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1620

III. United States Patent (19) Barefoot 5,507,368. Apr. 16, Patent Number: (45) Date of Patent:

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,220,819 B1

(12) United States Patent

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,543,270 B2

Phillips (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 10, (54) TRIPLE CLUTCH MULTI-SPEED (58) Field of Classification Search

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 6,915,721 B2. Hsu et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 12, 2005

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. SHIMANO INC., Petitioner

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,484,362 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,733,225 B1

(51) Int. Cl... B62D 25/00 flush with the end of the bed and the other edge overlapping

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,641,228 B2

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19)

USOO58065OOA United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,806,500 Fargo et al. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 15, 1998

United States Patent 19 Schechter

United States Patent (19) Muranishi

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, Petitioner. Patent No.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,624,044 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. U.S. Patent No. 6,837,551 Attorney Docket No.

(12) United States Patent

22-y 2 24, 7. -l- az. Z é - Jan. 26, 1971 D. F. webster 3,557,549 TURBOCHARGER SYSTEM FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE. is is a ST.

NOTICE. The above identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,378,207 B2

Electric motor pump with magnetic coupling and thrust balancing means

(12) United States Patent

OFF ROAD VEHICLE OPERATION VILLAGE OF CHESANING, SAGINAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO PREAMBLE

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

Case 1:99-mc Document 458 Filed 06/05/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 6,994,308 B1. Wang et al. (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 7, 2006

OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/08/2013.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/ A1

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,196,085 B1

US 9, B2. Stamps et al. Jul. 11, (45) Date of Patent: (10) Patent No.: (12) United States Patent (54)

TEPZZ 6Z7 _6A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2013/26

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. FUEL AUTOMATION STATION, LLC, Petitioner,

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

United States Patent (19) Miller, Sr.

United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,780,736 Russell 45) Date of Patent: Jul. 14, 1998

~ mi mi ii mi ii imiii i ii ii i ii European Patent Office Office europeen des brevets (11) EP A1 EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION

United States Patent (19) Reid

III III III. United States Patent 19 Justice. 11 Patent Number: position. The panels are under tension in their up position

IIIHIIII 5,509,863. United States Patent (19) Månsson et al. Apr. 23, Patent Number: 45) Date of Patent:

Advisory Opinion. Tokyo, Japan YAZAKI ENERGY SYSTEM CORPORATION

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/ A1

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,125,133 B2

(12) United States Patent

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1. Cervantes et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 7, 2007

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.2 US 6,778,074 B1 Cu0ZZ0 (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 17, 2004

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8, B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,416,362 B1

(11) 4,398,742. United States Patent (19) Sanders. (45) Aug. 16, Assistant Examiner-Mitchell J. Hill

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,152,637 Maughan (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 28, 2000

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,080,888 B2. Hach (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 25, 2006

/6/6 64. Oct. 14, , Vi: 2,613,753. Wa?ter C. Stueóira

Transcription:

U.S. Application No: 1 11465,498 Attorney Docket No: 8 1 143 194 (36 190-34 1) IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Application No: Filing Date: Applicant(s): Confirmation No: Group Art Unit: Examiner: Title: Attorney Docket No: Customer No: 111465,498 August 18,2006 Nichols et al. 1364 3677 Emily M. Morgan DOOR HINGE SYSTEM FOR AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE 81143194 (36190-341) 28549 Mail Stop Appeal Brief - Patents Commissioner for Patents P. 0. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 223 13-1450 APPEAL BRIEF This brief is submitted in support of the Notice of Appeal of the Final Rejection filed December 12, 2008.

U.S. Application No: 1 11465. 498 Attorney Docket No: 81 143 194 (361 90-341) TABLE OF CONTENTS & I. I1. 111. IV. V. VI. VII. Real Party in Interest... 3 Related Appeals and Interferences... 3 Status of the Claims... 3 Status of Amendments... 3 Summary of Claimed Subject Matter... 3 Grounds of Rejection to be Reviewed on Appeal... 5 Arguments... 5 VIII. Conclusion... 8 IX. x. XI. Claims Appendix... 9 Evidence Appendix... 12 Related Proceedings Appendix... 13

U.S. Application No: 111465,498 Attorney Docket No: 8 1 143 194 (36190-341) I. Real Party in Interest The real party in interest in this matter is Ford Global Technologies, LLC, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ford Motor Company, both of Dearborn, Michigan (hereinafter "Ford"). 11. Related Appeals and Interferences There are no other known appeals or interferences which will directly affect or be directly affected by or have bearing on the Board's decision in the pending appeal. 111. Status of the Claims Claims 1-10 are pending in the application. The rejection of Claims 1-10 is being appealed. IV. Status of Amendments No amendments were filed following the Final Rejection. V. Summary of Claimed Subject Matter Claims 1, 7 and 8 are the independent claims in this case. Claims 1, 7 and 8 are best understood with reference to Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6, and with the following citations to Appellants' specification. Independent Claim 1 A door hinge system for an automotive vehicle, 10, includes a hinge body, 36, having a first portion, 36a, pivotably attached to a door, 22, (Para. 21; lines 1-2) and a second portion, 36b, pivotably attached to a vehicle body, 28 (Para. 21; lines 1-2). A central control link, 40, (Para. 21; lines 2-4) has a first link end, 40a, and a second link end, 40b, (Para. 22; lines 3-4), with central control link 40 being pivotably attached to hinge body 36 at a position, 44, mediate first and second link ends 40a and 40b (Para. 26; lines 2-5). A body link, 48, has a first end, 48a, pivotably attached to vehicle body 28, and a second end, 48b, pivotably attached to the first link

U.S. Application No: 1 11465,498 Attorney Docket No: 8 1 143 194 (36190-341) end 40a of central control link (Para. 22; lines 2-6). A door link, 52, has a first end, 52a, pivotably attached to door 22, and a second end, 52b, pivotably attached to second link end 40b of central control link 40 (Para. 22; lines 3-6). Independent Claim 7 A door system for an automotive vehicle, 10, includes a door, 22, adapted for swinging about a generally vertical axis; an upper hinge body, 36, having a first end, 36a, pivotably attached to an upper portion of door 22, and a second end, 36b, adapted for pivotable attachment to an upper portion of vehicle body 28. (Para. 21; lines 1-2) An upper central control link, 40, has a first link end, 40a, and a second link end, 40b (Para. 21 ; lines 2-3 ). Central control link 40 is pivotably attached to upper hinge body 36 at a position, 44, mediate the first and second link ends (Para. 26; lines 2-5). A body link, 48, has a first end, 48a, adapted for pivotable attachment to vehicle body 28 (Para. 22; lines 3-6), and a second end, 48b, pivotably attached to first link end 40a of upper central control link 40 (Para. 22; lines 3-6). A door link, 52, has a first end, 52a, pivotably attached to door 22 and a second end, 52b, pivotably attached to the second link end 40b of said upper central control link 40 (Para. 22; lines 3-6). A lower hinge body, 36, has a first end, 36a, pivotably attached to a lower portion of door 22, and a second end, 36b, adapted for pivotable attachment to a lower portion of vehicle body 28; (Para. 21; lines 1-2). A lower central control link, 40, has a first link end, 40a, and a second link end, 40b (Para. 21; lines 2-3). Central control link 40 is pivotably attached to lower hinge body 36 at a position, 44, mediate the first and second link ends (Para. 26; lines 2-5). A body link, 48, has a first end, 48a, adapted for p~votable attachment to vehicle body 28 (Para. 22; lines 3-6), and a second end, 48b, pivotably attached to first link end 40a of lower central control link 40 (Para. 22; lines 3-6). A door link, 52, has a first end, 52a, pivotably attached to door 22 and a second end, 52b, pivotably attached to the second link end 40b of said lower central control link 40 (Para. 22; lines 3-6).

U.S. Application No: 1 11465,498 Attorney Docket No: 81 143 194 (36190-341) Independent Claim 8 An automotive vehicle, 10, includes a body having a passenger compartment with a door opening (Para. 18; lines 1-5). A door, 22, is sized to fit the door opening; a hinge body, 36, has a first end, 36a, pivotably attached to door 22, and a second end, 36b, pivotably attached to body 14, 28 (Para. 21; lines 1-2), such that door 22 may be rotated about a plurality of generally vertical axes. A central control link, 40, (Para. 21; lines 2-4) has a first link end, 40a, and a second link end, 40b, (Para. 22; lines 3-4), with central control link 40 being pivotably attached to hinge body 36 at a position, 44, mediate first and second link ends 40a and 40b (Para. 26; lines 2-5). A body link, 48, has a first end, 48a, pivotably attached to vehicle body 28, and a second end, 48b, pivotably attached to the first link end 40a of central control link (Para. 22; lines 2-6). A door link, 52, has a first end, 52a, pivotably attached to door 22, and a second end, 5211, pivotably attached to second link end 40b of central control link 40 (Para. 22; lines 3-6). VI. Grounds of Rejection to be Reviewed on Appeal 1. The rejection of Claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. 5 103(a) as being unpatentable over Russke (US 5,833,300) in view of Siladke et al. (US 5,491,875). VII. Arguments The rejection of Claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Russke (US 5,833,300) in view of Siladke et al. (US 5,491,875) The Examiner asserts that Russke discloses a hinge system having a hinge body, 20, having a first portion, 21, attached at point D, and a second portion, 19, attached to vehicle body at point B, and a central control link, 16, having a first link end and a second link end (Figure 9), with central control link 16 being pivotably attached to hinge body 20 and to a body link, 23, having a first end pivotably attached to vehicle body 29 at point B', and a second end pivotably

U.S. Application No: 1 11465,498 Attorney Docket No: 8 1 143 194 (36190-341) attached to the first link end of central control link 16 at point A', and a door link 24 having a first end pivotably attached at point D' and a second end pivotably attached to the second link end of central control link 16 at point C'. The Examiner admits that Russke does not disclose using the hinge mechanism on the door of a vehicle, but for this, the Examiner looks to Siladke, which the Examiner asserts, discloses a hinge mechanism having a hinged body 52 with a central control link, a body link 30, and a door link 60, citing Siladke at Figure 4. As set forth above in the Claim summary, a door hinge system includes a hinge body, 36, having a first portion, 36a, pivotably attached to a door, 22, and a second portion, 36b, pivotably attached to body 28. A central control link, 40, has a first link end, 40a, and a second link end, 40b. Central control link 40 is pivotably attached to hinge body 36 at a position mediate first and second link ends 40a and 40b. This limitation is found in each of Claims 1, 7 and 8. Applicants' claimed device also includes a body link, 48, having a first end, 48a, pivotably attached to vehicle body 28, and a second end, 48b, pivotably attached to first link end 40a of central control link 40. Finally, a door link, 52, has a first end, 52a, pivotably attached to door 22, and a second end, 52b, pivotably attached to second link end 40b of central control link 40. In contrast with Applicants' claimed device, Russke discloses a hinge in which the central control link, which the Examiner defines as item 16, is not pivotably attached at a position mediate its first and second ends to a hinge body. Rather, Russke's control link 16 is attached at one end to hinge body 20. Then, Russke uses a link, 24, from one end of his control link 16, and a second link, 23, which is attached to the middle of Russke's link 16. The Examiner apparently understands that Russke's kinematics are substantially different from the claimed structure; hence, the incorporation of Siladke in the rejection. The Examiner's

U.S. Application No: 1 11465,498 Attorney Docket No: 81 143 194 (36190-341) reliance on Siladke is not well-placed, because Siladke does not disclose body links and door links as set forth in Applicants' specification, because the cited "body link 30" the Examiner relies upon in Siladke is not pivoted at both ends; rather, it is noted froin Siladke at Figure 3 that structure 30 is rigidly attached to the vehicle body at one end, whereas Siladke's "door link 60" is rigidly attached to a door at one end. According to the lexicography of this case -- which follows the usual convention in automotive engineering -- neither of Siladke's links 32 or 60 may comprise a body link or door link as defined in Applicants' drawings, claims and specification, because the essence of a link, insofar as this case is concerned, is that both ends of the member must be pivotably attached to another structure. As a result, Applicants respectfully submit that neither Russke, nor Siladke, whether taken singly, or in combination with each other, either teach or suggest Applicants' claimed invention, because it would destroy the function of the Russke hinge, whatever it may be, to provide links which are not moveable at one end, as taught by Siladke. And, the Examiner has not indicated how the two references could be combined to overcome this functional problem. It seems clear, therefore, that teachings of Siladke and Russke are both incompatible and insufficient to support a prima facie case of obviousness, and this deficiency cannot be avoided by describing the combination of Siladke and Russke as a "mere rearrangement of parts", absent a description of a new structure which would demonstrably operate as claimed.

U.S. Application No: 1 11465,498 Attorney Docket No: 8 1 143 194 (361 90-341) VIII. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, Appellants respectfully request that the Board direct the Examiner in charge of this examination to withdraw the rejections and to issue Claims 1-10 remaining in this case. Please charge any fees required in the filing of this appeal to deposit account 06-1510. Date: Z( [!/09 38525 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2000 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-2970 734-623-1698

U.S. Application No: 1 11465,498 Attorney Docket No: 8 1 143 194 (361 90-341) IX. Claims Appendix 1. (Previously Presented) A door hinge system for an automotive vehicle, comprising: a hinge body having a first portion pivotably attached to a door, and a second portion pivotably attached to a vehicle body; a central control link having a first link end and a second link end, with said central control link being pivotably attached to said hinge body at a position mediate said first and second link ends; a body link having a first end pivotably attached to said vehicle body, and a second end pivotably attached to the first link end of said central control link; and a door link having a first end pivotably attached to said door, and a second end pivotably attached to the second link end of said central control link. -. 3 (Original) A door hinge system according to Claim 1, wherein said hinge body comprises a r~gid. C-shaped member having a first end pivotably attached to said door and a second end pivotably attached to said vehicle body. 7. (Original) A door hinge system according to Claim 1, wherein said second portion of said hinge body is pivotably attached to a C pillar portion of a vehicle body. 4. (Original) A door hinge system according to Claim 1, wherein said central control link is attached to said hinge body at a location offset laterally from a line connecting the pivot points at which said hinge body is attached to said door and said vehicle body. 3. (Original) A door hinge system according to Claim 1, wherein said hinge body is attached to said door and to said vehicle body for rotation about generally vertical axes. 6. (Original) A door hinge system according to Claim 1, wherein said central control link is attached to said hinge body at a location offset longitudinally from the center of a line which is parallel to a line connect~ng the pivot points at which said hinge body is attached to said door and said vehicle body. 7. (Original) A door system for an automotive vehicle, comprising: a door adapted for swinging about a generally vertical axis;

U.S. Application No: 1 11465,498 Attorney Docket No: 8 1 143 194 (36190-341) an upper hinge body having a first end pivotably attached to an upper portion of said door, and a second end adapted for pivotable attachment to an upper portion of a vehicle body; and upper central control link having a first link end and a second link end, with said central control link being pivotably attached to said upper hinge body at a position mediate said first and second link ends; a body link having a first end adapted for pivotable attachment to said vehicle body, and a second end pivotably attached to the first link end of said upper central control link; a door link having a first end pivotably attached to said door and a second end pivotably attached to the second link end of said upper central control link; a lower hinge body having a first end pivotably attached to a lower portion of said door, and a second end adapted for pivotable attachment to a lower portion of a vehicle body; a lower central control link having a first link end and a second link end, with said central control link being pivotably attached to said lower hinge body at a position mediate said first and second link ends; a body link having a first end adapted for pivotable attachment to said vehicle body, and a second end pivotably attached to the first link end of said lower central control link; a door link having a first end pivotably attached to said door and a second end pivotably attached to the second link end of said lower central control link. 8. (Original) An automotive vehicle, comprising: a body having a passenger compartment with a door opening; a door sized to fit said door opening; a hinge body having a first end pivotably attached to said door, and a second end pivotably attached to said body, such that said door may be rotated about a plurality of generally vertical axes; a central control link having a first link end and a second link end, with said central control link being plvotably attached to said hinge body at a position mediate said first and second link ends; a body link having a first end pivotably attached to said vehicle body, and a second end pivotably attached to the first link end of said central control link; and a door link having a first end pivotably attached to said door, and a second end pivotably attached to the second link end of said central control link.

U.S. Application No: 111465,498 Attorney Docket No: 81 143 194 (36190-341) 9. (Original) An automotive vehicle according to Claim 8, wherein said second end of said hinge body is attached to a C pillar of said body. 10. (Original) An automotive vehicle according to Claim 8, wherein said hinge body comprises a C-shaped member.

U.S. Application No: 111465,498 Attorney Docket No: 81 143194 (36190-341) X. Evidence Appendix None.

U.S. Application No: 1 11465,498 Attorney Docket No: 8 1 143 194 (36190-341) XI. Related Proceedings Appendix None.