High Octane Fuels, Making Better use of Ethanol

Similar documents
Can Fuel Efficiency Standards Be Met Cost-Effectively? The Potential for High-Octane, Low-Carbon Fuels

Effects of High-Octane Ethanol Blends on Four Legacy Flex-Fuel Vehicles, and a Turbocharged GDI Vehicle

Fuels to Enable More Efficient Engines

Light-Duty SI Engine Technologies and the Impact of Higher Carbon Alcohol Fuels

Dr. Terry Alger. Southwest Research Institute. Southwest Research Institute. San Antonio, Texas

Midterm Evaluation of the Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Standards

Direct Injection Ethanol Boosted Gasoline Engines: Biofuel Leveraging For Cost Effective Reduction of Oil Dependence and CO 2 Emissions

Advanced Vehicles & Fuel Quality

Fuel-Engine Co-Optimization with Ethanol for High Efficiency Engines

Viewing the Vehicle and Fuel as a System: The Economic Implications of High Octane Low Carbon Fuel

Wood-to-Wheels Engines and Vehicles Research

Vehicle Powertrain CO 2 Emissions in Review

The Future for the Internal Combustion Engine and the Advantages of Octane

Ethanol and Regulatory Perspectives

Steel Intensive Engine Executive Summary

From Passenger Vehicles - California's Program

2013 NCWM Interim Meeting January Charleston, SC

Application of the SuperGen Electro-Mechanical Supercharger to Miller-Cycle Gasoline Turbocharged Engines

Fuel and Aftertreatment Effects on Particulate and Toxic Emissions from GDI and PFI Vehicles: A Summary of CE-CERT s Research

Vehicle Technologies Program

Topic Paper #4. Alcohol Boosted Turbo Gasoline Engines

2012 SAE Government and Industry Meeting January 26, 2012 EPA & NHTSA

Meeting the Time Varying Gasoline Engine s Octane Requirement Through On Board Fuel Blending

ADVANCED STEEL OFFERS AUTOMAKERS AGGRESSIVE ENGINE DOWNSIZING

Potential Environmental and Economic Benefit s of Higher-Oct ane Gasoline

On the Road to the Future Powertrain. David Johnson President and CEO Achates Power

2017 ETHANOL PRODUCTION STRONGER THAN EVER

Medium-Duty Emissions and GHG from a Full-Line Manufacturer s Perspective

CRC Project No. CM-136

Cummins Light Truck Clean Diesel Engine. September 2004

Future Powertrain Technology for the North American Market: Diesel & Hydrogen

Automobile Manufacturers and E15 Approval. Tracey King Renewable Fuels Association

EVALUATION OF CURRENT AND FUTURE ATKINSON ENGINE TECHNOLOGIES

Lubrication Needs for Next Generation Gasoline Passenger Car Engine Technology

Gaseous Fuels in Transportation -- Prospects and Promise

Evaluation of Costs of EPA s GHG Standards With High Octane Fuels and Optimized High Efficiency Engines AIR, Inc. 1 September 14, 2016

PM Emissions from HCCI Engines

Lean Gasoline Engine. Focus Group March 31, 2011

Cummins Light Truck Clean Diesel Engine. September 2004

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE Washington, DC Washington, DC 20590

A PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO REDUCING THE CO2 FOOTPRINT OF THE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE

EPA Heavy Duty Vehicle Emissions Program

Volkswagen Group of America Virginia Energy Conference Session 30: Fossil Fuels Diesel Developments Presented by Stuart Johnson, Engineering and

MORPHOLOGY AND VOLATILITY OF PARTICULATE MATTER EMITTED FROM TWO DIRECT-INJECTION ENGINES

Potential of Modern Internal Combustion Engines Review of Recent trends

Cummins/DOE Light Truck Clean Diesel Engine Progress Report

Kurt Faller

BACK TO THE FUTURE: Lessons Learned from California s 1990s Methanol Program and Renewed Interest in Petroleum Reduction

EPA Advanced Technologies

STATEMENT OF WORK #1. Engine Durability Study

Study of Fuel Oxygenate Effects on Particulates from Gasoline Direct Injection Cars

Low Emissions IC Engine Development at Ford Motor Company

Emissions Characterization for D-EGR Vehicle

Advanced Combustion Strategies for High Efficiency Engines of the 21 st Century

Improving Engine Efficiency and Fuels: An Overview. John B. Heywood. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Nancy Homeister Manager, Fuel Economy Regulatory Strategy and Planning

October 5, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR Submitted via

MECA DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM OF ADVANCED EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES FINAL REPORT

U.S. Fuel Economy and Fuels Regulations and Outlook

Ultra-Low Carbon Powertrain Program (ETHOS) Sep 20, 2016

Corn Outlook. David Miller Director of Research & Commodity Services Iowa Farm Bureau Federation December 2013

By the Book: How to Offer E15

Development of Two-stage Electric Turbocharging system for Automobiles

Gasoline Engine Performance and Emissions Future Technologies and Optimization

Opportunities for Reducing Oil Demand for Transportation

Advanced Catalyzed Gasoline Particulate Filter to Fulfill Future Emission Targets

Cooled EGR and alternative fuels Solutions for improved fuel economy

Development of a Double Variable Cam Phasing Strategy for Turbocharged SIDI Engines

Tel Aviv 28 November 2011

New Engines and Fuels for U.S. Cars and Light Trucks Ryan Keefe* Jay Griffin* John D. Graham**

Final Report. Assessment of Higher Efficiency Options For Alcohol Fueled Vehicles +

Improving Fuel Efficiency with Fuel-Reactivity-Controlled Combustion

Fuel Economy, ACEA 2016 and other challenges for European Passenger Car Oils Richard van den Bulk

EPA Registration. 1. Attached is the EPA letter confirming the registration of the MPG-CAPS.

IS THE GASOLINE GALLON EQUIVALENT AN ACCURATE MEASURE OF MILEAGE FOR ETHANOL AND METHANOL FUEL BLENDS?

Advanced Emission Reduction Technologies for Locomotives: Fuels & Lubes

High Pressure Smoke Diagnostics. Mark Hawkins, Redline

MODELING ENGINE FRICTION WITH TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE FOR VEHICLE THERMAL MANAGEMENT

USABC Development of 12 Volt Energy Storage Requirements for Start-Stop Application

João Rafael Dezotti Neto, Everton Lopes da Silva, Eduardo Tomanik, Eduardo Nocera. MAHLE Metal Leve S.A.

Appendix B: Summary of high-octane research

GROWTH ENERGY MS. EMILY SKOR SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY & COMMERCE

Future Powertrain Conference 24 th February C 2016 HORIBA Ltd. All rights reserved.

Biofuels as Alternatives to Diesel and Gasoline

PEMS International Conference & Workshop April 3, 2014

Ethanol and the Economics of Octane The Superior Solution

Maximizing Engine Efficiency by Controlling Fuel Reactivity Using Conventional and Alternative Fuels. Sage Kokjohn

Regulatory and Compliance Update

Vehicle Transportation: Technology & Alternative Fuels

California Greenhouse Gas Vehicle and Fuel Programs

APBF-DEC Heavy Duty NOx Adsorber/DPF Project: Heavy Duty Linehaul Platform Project Update

Pima Association of Governments Energy Programs Clean Cities

Impact of Advanced Technologies on Medium-Duty Trucks Fuel Efficiency

GM and E85 Efforts. September Mary Beth Stanek

Fuel Efficiencies - A Supplier Perspective. June 4th, 2009

Opportunities for Reducing Transportation s Petroleum Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Opportunities in CNG. July, 2016

Lean Gasoline Engine Emission Challenges

Low Temperature Aftertreatment for Future Engines Challenges and Opportunities

U.S. Navy Fleet AFV Program Report for Fiscal Year 2006 February 12, 2007

Transcription:

High Octane Fuels, Making Better use of Ethanol Brian West Fuels, Engines, and Emissions Research Center EESI High-Octane Fuels Briefing Washington, DC November 13, 2017 Work supported by DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Ag/Auto/Ethanol Workgroup

Ethanol is a very effective octane booster ~2/3 rd of octane benefit from first 1/3 rd of ethanol volume percent U.S. EPA opened the door for a high octane ~E30 fuel in Tier 3 rule we allow vehicle manufacturers to request approval for fuel such as a high-octane 30 percent ethanol blend (E30) for vehicles optimized for such fuel Road fuel infrastructure for a midlevel ethanol blend is not trivial (but significantly less complex than many other alternatives) USDA Biofuel Infrastructure Partnership is helping grow number of stations capable of dispensing E25 and higher blends Research Octane Number 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 D4806 Data from Stein, et al., SAE 2012-01-1277 0 20 40 60 80 100 Ethanol Content (vol %) 2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy

Industry and DOE Investing In Programs to Quantify Efficiency and GHG Benefits of High Octane Fuels DOE Work supported by Vehicle Technologies Office Bioenergy Technologies Office Brake Thermal Efficiency (%) 40 35 30 25 20 15 92 RON (E0) CR10.1 101 RON (E30) CR 10.1 101 RON (E30) CR12 Industry Cost-Share, Funds-in, and Tech Support Ford General Motors Fiat Chrysler Coordinating Research Council Ag/Auto/Ethanol Workgroup Thermal Efficiency of Ford EcoBoost (data from Sluder, ORNL) 3 10 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 Brake Mean Effective Pressure (kpa) Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy

A New High Octane Fuel Could Make Better Use of Ethanol s Properties, Moving The U.S. Toward Multiple Goals Engine efficiency can be improved with increasing ethanol and octane rating E25-E40 blend in future vehicles can return equivalent tank mileage as E10 in today s comparable vehicles Energy density penalty is linear with increasing ethanol concentration Power and efficiency gains are non-linear Volumetric Fuel Economy Parity means every gallon of ethanol displaces a gallon of gasoline Efficiency/fuel economy benefit to OEM is significant Can help U.S. Comply with Renewable Fuel Standard Legal to use in >20M legacy FFVs REGULAR Today s Octane Numbers PLUS PREMIUM Future: New Regular? HIGH OCTANE FUEL MINIMUM OCTANE RATING RON METHOD 100 Managed by UT-Battelle for the 4 U.S. Department of Energy 4

5 A few example results

High Octane Vehicle Demonstration Supported by DOE Bioenergy Technologies Office and follow-on work by Ag/Auto/Ethanol Objective: Demonstrate High Octane fuel benefits at the vehicle level Late model vehicle with 2.0 liter, 4-cylinder, turbocharged GDI engine Efficiency gains of 5-10% demonstrated with high-octane mid-level blends Fuel Economy (E0mpg equivalent) 27.0 26.0 25.0 E0_equiv mpg CO2 g/mi +8.5% FTP (City Test) -6.6% 400 350 300 CO2 Emissions (g/mi) Piston Blank Cadillac ATS equipped with a 2.0 liter turbocharged, direct-injection engine and manual transmission 9.5:1 Production 10.5:1 Prototype 24.0 Baseline E10 Downsped E10 Downsped E30 Factory Setup 10.5:1 Compression Pistons, Downspeeding 250 6 Range bars denote max and min of multiple tests

Ag/Auto/Ethanol Supporting Mini Cooper E25 Demonstration Vehicle Specs: 2.0 liter turbo GDI Factory pistons and drivetrain Why Mini? Owner s manual calls out E25: Tier 3 E10 and Tier 3 E25 fuels High-Octane E25 provides efficiency and performance gains Property Research Octane Number Motor Octane Number Test Method Tier 3 E10 Value Tier 3 E25 Value ASTM D2699 92.3 98.9 ASTM D2700 84.5 87.5 AKI (RON+MON)/2 88.4 93.2 Sensitivity RON-MON 7.8 11.4 7 * Acknowledgement to BMW for informal technical support

Downsizing experiments conducted with Mini Cooper on dynamometer using 2006 Dodge Charger test weight and road load. High-octane E25 on aggressive US06 test provides efficiency gain over regular E10. Fuel Economy (E0-equiv. mi/gal) 27.0 26.5 26.0 25.5 25.0 24.5 US06 Aggressive Driving Test 2.0 Turbo GDI Mini Cooper Tested at 4500 lb Dodge Charger Test Weight (downsize experiment) 3.6% 2006 Dodge Charger dynamometer settings used with Mini Cooper vehicle to simulate downsizing 24.0 E10 E25 8 Range bars indicate max and min of multiple tests

Extreme downsizing can improve fuel economy at the expense of acceleration performance. Mini is 0.4s quicker with high-octane E25 than with E10. With Charger test weight, vehicle considerably slower; high-octane E25 again provides 0.4s quicker acceleration. Aftermarket Power Module increases boost, improves acceleration time by 2.4 s with HO E25 fuel. 14.0 13.0 E10-Mini E25-Mini 13.02 2006 Dodge Charger dynamometer settings used with Mini Cooper to simulate downsizing 15-80 mph Elapsed Time (s) 12.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 E10-Charger E25-Charger E25-Charger with Power Module 9.01 8.61 12.58 10.60 NM Engineering Power Module (PM) intercepts T MAP sensor and increases boost. PM installed by previous owner; PM was disconnected for all tests except these final E25 WOT tests. http://www.nmeng.com/338/0/0/3128/nm64884 6-nm-eng-power-module.html 9 7.0 E10 Mini Cooper E25 E10 E25 E25 Dodge Charger Dyno Settings

F150 EcoBoost * Currently Under Test * 3.5L Turbocharged V6 Status Baseline testing at ORNL with Tier 3 E10 and E25 ** Complete Piston swap complete Mahle designed, fabricated, and delivered high-compression pistons (target +2.2 CR) More significant CR increase than previous experiments Ford F150 in ORNL Laboratory High Compression Experiments Underway Measurements planned Fuel Economy NMHC/NMOG, CO, NOx emissions PM mass (cold LA4) Acceleration **Same fuels used in Mini Cooper Work supported by Ag/Auto/Ethanol Workgroup Factory 10:1 MAHLE 12.2:1 Ford F150 Pistons 10

Factory and High Compression Pistons for Ford EcoBoost Engine from MAHLE Powertrain Factory 10:1 Prototype 12.2:1 11

F150 EcoBoost V6 Acceleration: High Octane E25 Provides performance difference over regular E10 in baseline (factory) test condition 9.5 9.0 E10 E25 Acceleration Time (s) 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 20 to 75 mph 15 to 80 mph 12

F150 EcoBoost V6 Particulate Matter: Baseline tests show E25 provides statistically significant reduction in cold start particulate matter over regular E10. Cold portion of test generally produces ~90% of particulate matter in certification test 12 Cold Start PM Baseline (Cold LA4) [mg/mile] FTP Cold-Start PM (mg/mile) 10 8 6 4 2 13 0 E10 E25 Range Bars Show min and max of three measurements

Summary High-octane fuels can enable improved vehicle efficiency (in vehicles designed for their use) Vehicle-level demonstrations have shown efficiency gains can more than offset lowered energy density of added ethanol Vehicle efficiency gains of up to 12% demonstrated Improved torque and power can provide performance improvement (or permit smaller engines) Legacy FFVs, turbo GDI engines (Mini Cooper) show improved acceleration, demonstrate potential for OEMs if fuel widely available 14 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy

Contact Information Brian West Deputy Director Fuels, Engines, and Emissions Research Center (865) 946-1231 westbh@ornl.gov 15 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy

Acknowledgements DOE Vehicle Technologies Office DOE Bioenergy Technologies Office Ag/Auto/Ethanol Workgroup National Corn Growers Illinois Corn Marketing Board Missouri Corn Growers Industry Partners and National Lab Peers Fuels, Engines, Emissions Research Center (FEERC) colleagues 16

Backup Slides 17 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy

Recent Experiments Highlight Efficiency Benefits of High Octane Fuel for SI engines Engines can make more torque and power with higher octane fuel Ethanol is very effective at boosting octane number 87 AKI E0 + 30% Ethanol = 101 RON Fuel Increased torque enables downspeeding and downsizing for improved fuel economy For future vehicles, engine and system efficiency can balance lower energy density of ethanol blends IMEP = data point E0 (9.2:1) Best Efficiency E30 (12:1) Constant Power 101 RON E30 87 AKI E0 E0 (12:1) 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200 Engine Speed (RPM) In a high compression research engine, high-octane E30 enables doubling of available torque compared to 87 AKI E0 fuel - Splitter and Szybist, ORNL 18

Legacy FFVs Realize Performance Gain with High Octane Mid-Level Ethanol Blends Work supported by DOE Bioenergy Technologies Office Motivation: Measureable performance improvement in legacy FFVs could enable early adoption of High Octane Fuel for Your FFV Tested 4 ethanol tolerant FFVs GMC Sierra Chevrolet Impala Ford F150 Dodge Caravan Prep and Baseline wide open throttle (WOT) test with Regular E10 Prep and WOT test with ~100 RON E30 HIGH OCTANE FUEL For your FFV MINIMUM OCTANE RATING RON METHOD 100 Car and Driver FFV test shows 0.4 second faster 0-60 mph time with E85 www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2014-chevrolet-silverado-v-6-instrumented-test-review Report available: 3 of 4 FFVs show acceleration improvement with E30 19 ORNL s Sierra results with E30 similar to Car and Driver test with E85 If half of FFVs on road today filled up with E25 half the time, nation would consume over halfbillion gallons more ethanol Time (s) 13.3 13.2 13.1 13.0 12.9 12.8 12.7 12.6 12.5 15 MPH to 80 MPH WOT Acceleration Time (GMC Sierra FFV, 12 run average) E10 Regular E10 0.45 seconds 10.1 CR (factory) High Octane E30 RSP E30 http://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/files/pub54888.pdf