ON BOARD MEASUREMENTS OF SCRUBBER

Similar documents
ECA Compliance & PM. Thomas Kirk Director of Environmental Programs. Ottawa, Canada 9 September 2014

Exhaust Gas Cleaning System Guidelines An Update May 2017

DNV GL EGC system approval and experience

RESOLUTION MEPC.259(68) (adopted on 15 May 2015) 2015 GUIDELINES FOR EXHAUST GAS CLEANING SYSTEMS

RESOLUTION MEPC.184(59) Adopted on 17 July GUIDELINES FOR EXHAUST GAS CLEANING SYSTEMS

"Exhaust Gas Scrubbers Abatement System as an Alternative under IMO MARPOL Annex VI''

Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems. (Scrubber / SCR) Dual Fuel Engines

Case study -MARPOL emission standards ECA Compliance. Your Trusted Partner

RESOLUTION MEPC.170(57) Adopted on 4 April 2008 GUIDELINES FOR EXHAUST GAS CLEANING SYSTEMS

NORTH AMERICAN AND US CARIBBEAN SEA ECA UNDERSTANDING COMPLIANCE ISSUES

Monitoring Air Emissions on Ships. Restricted Siemens AG 2014 All rights reserved.

Exhaust Gas Cleaning A green and Economical choice

SOx scrubbers Engine Makers view MDT points, markets and Tier III combinations. Greener Shipping Summit Jesper Arvidsson

Exhaust Gas Cleaning Program

Exhaust Gas Cleaning System (Scrubber)

World s Smallest SO X Removal Cyclone Scrubber for Marine Vessels

Dr Diamantis Andriotis, Technical Manager, Stealth Maritime Corporation SA

GASEOUS FUELS SAFETY ASPECTS

Scrubbing Systems for the Marine and Offshore Industries.

EffShip. Love Hagström D.E.C. Marine AB

Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference. MARPOL Annex VI TECHNOLOGY & COMPLIANCE. Ramona Zettelmaier Lloyd s Register

GREEN SHIPPING SUMMIT 2016 BWTS - EGCS. Andrea COGLIOLO Deputy General Manager Marine

Consistent implementation of the 2020 sulphur limit and work to further address GHG emissions from international shipping

Regulatory update on implementation of the 0.50% sulphur limit for international shipping

INTEGRATED MULTISTREAM EXHAUST GAS CLEANING

Emission project guide

RESOLUTION MEPC.251(66) Adopted on 4 April 2014

Global Sulfur Cap

Effect of SOx and NOx Regulation Implementation, ECA s and NOx Tier III Current Developments in General

PureSO x. Exhaust gas cleaning. This document, and more, is available for download from Martin's Marine Engineering Page -

NORTH AMERICAN ECA AND NEW FUEL SULFUR CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

Commercial Marine Presentation

Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI)

EXHAUST GAS CLEANING SYSTEMS

HYBRID & LNG SOLUTIONS FOR FERRIES

IEA Bioenergy ExCo78 workshop Biofuel supply to Interislander

CIRCULAR IMO FAQ on the sulphur limits in Emission Control Areas (ECAs)

Regulatory Compliance Shipowner Perspective

PUBLIC TEST REPORT EXHAUST GAS SCRUBBER INSTALLED ONBOARD MT SUULA 20 JUNE, 2010

By Edmund Hughes, Technical Officer, Marine Environment Division, IMO

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to A key to understanding the future of marine bunkers and fuel oil markets

MARITIME GLOBAL SULPHUR CAP. Know the different choices and challenges for on-time compliance SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

Implementation of SECA rules in the Baltic countries

Preliminary Report of MEPC 73

ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

Form of IOPP Certificate and Supplements * INTERNATIONAL OIL POLLUTION PREVENTION CERTIFICATE

ANNEX 30 RESOLUTION MEPC.240(65) Adopted on 17 May 2013

Emissions Control Strategies from Ocean Going Vessels Effect on Black Carbon Emission Methods

Innovation and Sustainability: new systems to reduce exhaust emissions

Alternative fuels and abatement technology for future shipping an overview

Technical File Engine Model: MD706MX (4.2L 230) - MD706MS (4.2L 200)

EMISSION ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES

INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION (IMO) Technical File and Copy of United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Statement of Compliance

ECO optimization with NOx equipment

3. Steam Turbines and Boilers

Emission Project Guide MAN B&W Two-stroke Marine Engines

Water Scrubbing Technology for reducing marine emissions

Technical Publication. Guidelines for the development of ship's Data Collection Plan (SEEMP Part II) /

The international SAACKE Group. SAACKE Marine Systems - Company Presentation / 02

Assessment of Fuel Oil Availability (stakeholder consultation) EGCSA Annual Meeting, 25 February 2016

Preliminary Report of MEPC 71

Opening keynote: Setting the scene the shipowners and shipmanagers point of view

Marine Division. Peter Leifland Alfa Laval Group

Royal Belgian Institute of Marine Engineers

Annex-1: Summary of new IMO requirements from 1 January2017 Resolution New Ship Existing Ship Subject Remarks Ship type Size Compliance date

Emission Project Guide MAN B&W Two-stroke Marine Engines

11,000 teu container vessel

2020 Fuel Oil Sulphur Cap. Stamford, CT March 12, North American Panel Mee1ng. Interna1onal Associa1on of Independent Tanker Owners

Internationaler Congress für Schiffstechnik

Pollution & GHG emissions from ships. Development of market-based. Marine Environment Division - IMO

RESOLUTION MEPC.251(66) (Adopted on 4 April 2014) AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNEX OF THE PROTOCOL OF 1997 TO AMEND THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE

DIFFERENTIATED PORT DUES AND EPI

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Desulphurizing Bunker Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology

Ship Energy Efficiency and Air Pollution. Ernestos Tzannatos Department of Maritime Studies University of Piraeus

MARTOB Application of low sulphur marine fuels New challenges for the Marine Industry. Kjell Olav Skjølsvik MARINTEK

2ND EXAM OF MAIN MACHINERY AND AUXILIARY MARINE SYSTEMS

SFOC Optimisation with Low Load or Part Load Exhaust Gas Bypass (LL-EGB, PL-EGB)

MARINE EXHAUST GAS CLEANING SOLUTIONS

Design and experimental study on desulphurization process of ship exhaust

Tier III considerations

PAX_SOLUTIONS IMO2020 EMISSIONS MANAGEMENT. October 2018

GREENER SHIPPING SUMMIT 2017

Green Event Athens, Gazarte Frode Helland-Evebø Chief Sales & Marketing Officer

Insight in the Development of MAN s Game Changing 45/60CR Engine Portfolio

Assessing Ship Emissions Reduction Strategies. Pacific Ports Clean Air Collaborative Conference March 2018 San Pedro, California

Bunker Fuel Quality: 2020 Outlook North of England P&I Athens, November

Transport Canada Marine Safety Emission Control Area North America

Monitoring, reporting and verification of CO 2 emissions from ships - EU MRV regulation and obligations and the parallel IMO activities

MARINE POWER PLANT POLLUTANT EMISSIONS

Guidelines for PSCOs on the Inspection Campaign on MARPOL ANNEX VI

SCR under pressure - pre-turbocharger NOx abatement for marine 2-stroke diesel engines

Field experience with considerably reduced NOx and Smoke Emissions

Looking to the Future: Operating in an Emissions Control Area (ECA)

MARPOL Annex I and Changes to the Oil Record Book Parts I and II.

ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

TYPE APPROVED CEMS GREEN EFFICIENCY ON BOARD

Are lubricants an aid to meeting requirements resulting from new regulations challenges? 6th May 2011 Patrick HAVIL

ANNEX 7. RESOLUTION MEPC.182(59) Adopted on 17 July 2009

SHIP ENERGY EFFICIENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN SEEMP. Edilberto Peralta Operations Manager Central and South America

Transcription:

ON BOARD MEASUREMENTS OF SCRUBBER PERFORMANCE ON VESSELS Tadeusz Borkowski Maritime University of Szczecin

Contents: 1. Background wet scrubber types Wet Scrubbing classic functional principle of operation Wet and Dry Scrubbing current approach 2. Gas Cleaning System list of manufacturers 3. EGCS installations number in service 4. Regulatory requirements 5. On board survey methodology 6. Ship s routine voyage and relevant EGCS operation 7. emission in open loop mode 8. Sea and washwater parameters in open loop mode 9. emission and sea water parameters in closed loop mode 1. Conclusions

Wet Scrubbing classic functional principle of operation Wet scrubbers Packed Bed Packed Bed Tower Bath Packed bed

Membrane Wet and Dry Scrubbing current approach Wet scrubbers Dry scrubber Venturi SO 2 Venturi Cyclonic Membrane

Gas Cleaning System list of manufacturers WARTSILA AEC MARITIME WÄRTSILÄ MOSS ANDRITZ AIR POLLUT. CONTROL CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT ECOSPRAY TECHNOLOGIES LANGH TECH PURETEQ ALFA-LAVAL CLEAN MARINE FUJI ELECTRIC MAN DIESEL SAACKE MARINE SYSTEMS BABCOCK NOELL CR OCEAN ENGINEERING LAB MARINE EXHAUST SOLUTIONS TRITON EMISSION SOLUTIONS INC. BLUESOUL DUPONT BELCO CLEAN AIR IONADA MUNTERS YARA MARINE

EGCS installations number in service Ships equipped with EGCS TANKER 39 SERVICE 2 RORO SHIP GENERAL CARGO 25 CRUISE SHIP CONTAINER 27 113 11 Scrubber units in service 6 5 4 3 2 1 BULK CARRIER 24 5 1 15 Source: IHS Maritime 217 Source: IHS Maritime 217 Estimated number of scrubber units onboard In Service 843 Keel laid 13 Launched 16 On order and not commenced 21 Under construction 2 Total 895 Source: IHS Maritime 217

Regulatory requirements IMO Resolutions: MEPC.13(53), MEPC.17(57) and MEPC.184(59) 29; Guidelines for Gas Cleaning Systems, adopted on 17 July 29 emissions compliance limits For EGC systems operating on conventional fuel oils, exhaust emission compliance with the equivalent fuel oil sulphur content is verified from the measured SO2/CO2 concentration ratio Fuel Oil Sulfur Content (% m/m ) discharge and limits Emission Ratio SO 2 (ppm)/co 2 (% v/v ).1 4.3 1. ph criteria The ph of the discharged wash water from the scrubbing process should be no lower than 6.5 units 2. PAH* concentration The washwater maximum continuous PAH concentration is not to be greater than 5 μg/ltr above water PAH concentration 3. Turbidity The turbidity of the EGC unit washwater should not exceed 25 NTU above *Polycyclic the Aromatic water Hydrocarbons turbidity

On board survey methodology EGCS Operational survey EGCS documenation EGCS compliance EGCS operational data Ship Propulsion SO x Emissions Compliance Plan - SECP EGCS Technical Manual - ETM Onboard Monitoring Manual - OMM EGCS efficiency EGCS running cost emissions discharge Operating parameters Ship s speed Main engine power Auxiliary electric load Electronic Logging System - EGC EGCS reliability Electrical consumption Fuel oil consumption Emission factors NaOH consumption Sludge discharge

6.5 MW PEM 6.5 MW PEM 4.5 MW 4.5 MW 4.5 MW 4.5 MW Ship s propulsion and EGCS layout Ship s Diesel-Electric main/auxiliary propulsion Multiunit Hybrid Gas Cleaning System SO 2 SO 2 SO 2 SO 2 CO 2 CO 2 CO 2 CO 2 G ~ G ~ G ~ G ~ 6.6 kv 6.6 kv 44 V 44 V Main Engine specification Type MaK 6M 552 C Engine 4 stroke, direct injection Rated power 45 kw Rated speed 5 rpm Bore 45 mm Stroke 52 mm gas temperature - max 65 C

Ship s routine voyage and relevant EGCS operation 2 2 14 Ship speed [kts] 15 1 5 Ship speed Propulsion power Full steaming 21-Jul 21-Jul 21-Jul 15 1 5 Propulsion power [kw] 12 1 8 6 4 2 Manoeuvring Open Loop Port approaching Open Loop. 4.5 9. 13.5 18.1 22.6 27.1 Ship's speed [Kts] Steaming Open Loop Fuel oil Type Marine fuel RMG 38 Density 15 C 981. kg/m 3 Viscosity 5 C 375 cst Water % Sulphur % 1.75 EGCS running hours [hr] 24 2 16 12 8 4 Steaming - Open Loop At berth - Closed Loop 1 8 6 4 2 OP/CL Ratio 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 Day of the month

EGCS in open loop mode - compliance monitoring Engine sulphur combustion chemistry: gas De-plume unit SO 2 CO 2 S + O2 SO2 ~ 95% SO2 + ½O2 SO3 ~ 5% SO x reactions in Open Loop: for SO 2 Scrubber unit SO 2 + H 2 O H 2 SO 3 H 2 SO 3 H + + HSO 3 - HSO 3 - H + + SO 3 2- PAH ph Tur. Sea Water SO 3 2- +.5 O 2 SO 4 2- PAH ph Tur. Wash Water gas Residence tank Cleaning unit Settling tank for SO 3 SO 3 + H 2 O H 2 SO 4 H 2 SO 4 + H 2 O HSO - 4 + H 3 O + HSO - 4 + H 2 O SO 2-4 + H 3 O +

emission in open loop mode CO 2 [%] 8 6 4 2 Scrubber unit No: 1 * CO 2 Faulty SO 2 indications * SO 2 4 2 SO 2 [ppm] CO 2 [%] 9 6 3 Scrubber unit No: 2 * CO 2 Faulty SO 2 indications * SO 2 4 2 SO 2 [ppm] -2 1 2 1-2 2 CO 2 [%] 1 8 6 4 Scrubber unit No: 3 * CO 2 6 4 2 SO 2 [ppm] CO 2 [ppm] 8 7 6 5 4 3 Scrubber unit No: 4 * CO 2 4 2 SO 2 [ppm] 2 2 1 Faulty SO 2 indications * SO 2 * SO 2-2 1 2 1-2

Sea and washwater parameters in open loop mode 1 8. 8 ph: 7.9 6. ph: 6.2 ph [-] 6 4 6 5 4 3 2 1 Sea Water ph [-] 4. 4 3 2 1 2 5.9 7.2 8.14 1 2 2. 5.8 6.175 6.55 6.925 7.3 1 2 4 1 8 Sea Water 3 6 4 PAH [µg/l] 2 2.1 9.1 18.1 27. EGCS Starting up 1 PAH: 2.2 1 2

Sea and washwater parameters in open loop mode Turbidity [NTU] 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 1 8 6 4 2 4 48 92 136 Sea Water EGCS Starting up 2 Turbidity: 6.2 1 2 Turbidity [NTU] 12 1 8 6 4 2 1 8 6 4 2 6. 29.75 53.5 77.25 Turbidity: 8.9 1 2

EGCS in closed loop mode - compliance monitoring gas SO x reactions in Closed Loop: SO 2 CO 2 for SO 2 De-plume unit Na + + OH - + SO 2 NaHSO 3 2Na + + 2OH - + SO 2 Na 2 SO 3 + H 2 O Scrubber unit 2Na + + 2OH - + SO 2 + 1/2 O 2 Na 2 SO 4 + H 2 O for SO 3 SO 3 + H 2 O H 2 SO 4 2NaOH + H 2 SO 4 Na 2 SO 4 + 2H 2 O Sea Water NaOH tank Sea Water PAH ph Tur. gas Process tank Holding tank PAH ph Tur. Separator Sludge tank

1221 emission and sea water parameters in closed loop mode Engine power [kw] 5 4 3 2 1 Rated power At berth Engine power: 122 kw 12 1 8 6 4 2 CO 2 [%] 15 12 9 6 3 Faulty SO 2 indications 15 1 5-5 -1-15 SO 2 [ppm] 1 2 * CO 2 * SO 2 1-2 2 1. 1 ph [-] 8. 6. 4. 2.. 2 15 1 5 ph: 6.9 5.2 6.2 7.2 8.2 9.2 Process Water 1 2 ph [-] 9 Sea Water ph: 6.3 6 * ph 3 Turbidity: 11.8 8 6 4 * Turbidity 2 1 2 Turbidity [NTU]

Conclusions 1. Hybrid EGCS performance measurements were carried out on board the ship during two month service operation period. 2. On average EGCS operation in open loop mode was 17 hrs at sea and 7 hrs a day in closed loop at port. 3. SO X and CO 2 emissions results are characterized by strong scattering of values, which in principle makes it impossible to assess compliance with the relevant limits, expressed in MEPC.184 (59) 29 guidelines. 4. Undoubtedly, this has to do with variable EGCS mode of operation, which is determined by the load of propulsion engines. 5. Sea water system exhibits much more stable parameters, qualifying for compliance assessment. Results of measurement of seawater parameters showed a slight lower ph value; 6.2 (OL) and 6.3 (CL) below the limit value 6.5. 6. No Turbidity of 8.9 NTU (OP) and 11.8 NTU (CL) over 25 NTU limit was exceeded. Survey period July August EGCS mode of operation Open Loop Closed Loop Open Loop Closed Loop EGCS runing hours [hr] 532 212 516 228 EGCS electric consumption [kwh] 397 81 78 591 385 844 84 513 EGCS fuel oil consumption [mt] 14.1 26.8 12.9 26.2 Total ship s fuel oil consumption [mt] 14 988 NaOH solution consumption [ltrs] 69 6875

Conclusions 1. The EGCS and related facilities introduce significant increases in electricity consumption, both: at sea and berth and this transfers into an increase in fuel consumption of 12.85 % of the total actual ship s flowrate. 2. The EGCS efficiency was estimated using the formula: ξ 1 = E SO2 E SO2 1% E SO2 and reached: 93.8 %. 3. Actual consumption of NaOH solution remains at 6.8 ltr/t of fuel oil. 4. The SOx emission for a ship equipped with EGCS was estimated at.47 g/kwh. 12 2. Scrubber efficiency [%] 1 8 6 4 2 6 5 4 3 2 1 SO 2 emission - [ppm] 1.26 43.1 84.94 Scrubber unit efficiency: 93.8% 1 2 3 4 SO 2 [g/kwh] 1.5 1..5 3 SO 2 specific emission [g/kwh] 25 2 15 1 5 -.165 1.1332 2.4313.4841 1.7823 SO 2 spec.:.47. 1 2 3 4 Engine power [kw] Engine power [kw]

Thank you for your attention