THE IMPACT OF THE LCFS ON CALIFORNIA S TRANSPORTATION FUEL MARKET

Similar documents
California Environmental Protection Agency. Air Resources Board. Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) Update 2015 CRC LCA of Transportation Fuels Workshop

Your Fuel Can Pay You: Maximize the Carbon Value of Your Fuel Purchases. Sean H. Turner October 18, 2017

RNG Production for Vehicle Fuel. April 4, 2018

Renewable Fuels: Overview of market developments in the US and a focus on California

CALIFORNIA S LOW CARBON FUEL STANDARD (LCFS) REVIEW OF COMPLIANCE TRENDS

The California Low Carbon Fuel Standard. John D. Courtis August 10-12, 2009

California s Low Carbon Fuel Standard

Lower Carbon Intensity Solution. How Biodiesel Has Become the Answer to Emission-cutting Initiatives

ZEVs Role in Meeting Air Quality and Climate Targets. July 22, 2015 Karen Magliano, Chief Air Quality Planning and Science Division

UC DAVIS SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION ENERGY PATHWAYS

Susan G. Lafferty. P: E:

State of the States NATIONAL BIODIESEL BOARD. Jacobsen Conference. Shelby Neal. May 24, 2018 Chicago, IL

POLICIES THAT REDUCE OUR DEPENDENCE ON OIL. Carol Lee Rawn Ceres November 2013

Welcome and Introduction June 2007

Environment and Climate Change Canada Clean Fuel Standard for ISCC Stakeholder Meeting North America

How to Get to a Biofuels Future. Governors Ethanol Coalition Chicago, Illinois April 2008

How Carbon Intense Is Your Fuel?

GROWING YOUR BUSINESS WITH BIODIESEL. Copyright 2016 Renewable Energy Group, Inc.

Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program. Advisory Committee Meeting

Addressing Indirect Land Use Change in the NEMA LCFS

The Clean Energy Biofuels Act of 2008: Promoting Advanced Biofuels in Massachusetts

Part 3 Agreement Programs for 2017 and Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Renewable and Low Carbon Fuel Requirements) Act

U.S. Alternative Fuels Policies Lessons Learned and Future Directions

To: Honorable Public Utilities Board Submitted by: /s/ Barry Leska AGM Energy Resources Planning. From: Sarah Liuba Approved by: /s/

Legislative and Regulatory Developments Likely to Affect the U.S. Refining Sector in the Next Decade

California Low Emission Truck Policies and Plans

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

Public Meeting Point of Regulation for the Sources of Fuel Combustion Included in the Second Compliance Period in a California Cap-and-Trade Program

Legal Quick Hit: Top Five Issues when Complying with California s Low Carbon Fuel Standard

Opportunities in Biodiesel, 2006 to 2010

LOW CARBON FUELS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

Biofuels Outlook - December 2017

California Greenhouse Gas Vehicle and Fuel Programs

An overview of national, international and state low carbon fuel policies

RFS2: Where Are We Now And Where Are We Heading? Paul N. Argyropoulos

Agreement with Enbridge for the Installation of Compressed Natural Gas Refuelling Stations at City Facilities

RICanada Comments on the British Columbia Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Renewable and Low Carbon Fuel Requirements) Act and the Renewable and Low Carbon

EPA MANDATE WAIVERS CREATE NEW UNCERTAINTIES IN BIODIESEL MARKETS

Renewable and Low Carbon Fuel Requirements Regulation Summary:

LOW CARBON FUEL REQUIREMENTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

Future of Biofuel Use in the United States: An Examination of the Renewable Fuel Standard

The Northeast / Mid-Atlantic Low-Carbon Fuels Initiative Matt Solomon

The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA): Proposed Changes to the Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2)

INDIRECT LAND USE CHANGE, LOW CARBON FUEL STANDARDS, & CAP AND TRADE: The Role of Biofuels in Greenhouse Gas Regulation

NYC s GREEN Fuel Supplier... March 2010

Electric Vehicle Charge Ready Program

FARMLAND MARKETS: PROFITABILITY AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

California Low Carbon Fuel Standard Status Report. John D. Courtis October 17, 2011

NYSERDA Alternative Fuel Vehicle Programs. Patrick Bolton and Adam Ruder NYSERDA April 24, 2013

State Policy Trends in Biomass

Designing a Low-Carbon Fuel Standard for the Northeast

BIODIESEL 2020: Global Market Survey, Case Studies and Forecasts. Multi-Client Study pages - Published October, 2006 by Emerging Markets Online

Overview of Plug-In Electric Vehicle Readiness. Coachella Valley Association of Governments

Creating a Large, Guaranteed Market for Advanced Biofuels Through a Low Carbon Fuel Standard

Methodology. Supply. Demand

Published on Market Research Reports Inc. (

Copyright 2018 Renewable Energy Group, Inc. AFOA Biomass Based Diesel Market Trends

A CRITICAL U.S. BIOFUELS MARKET JUNCTURE: HOW WILL IT IMPACT YOU?

Low Carbon Fuel Standard i LUC Status

Genbright LLC. AEE Technical Round Table 11/15/2017

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS GREEN FLEET POLICY

March 18, Samira Monshi Seungwon Noh Wilfredo Rodezno Brian Skelly

Overview of California AB32 Regulations

A CO2-fund for the transport industry: The case of Norway

Department of Legislative Services

Why California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard Matters To You

Plug-in Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure

Energy Independence. tcbiomass 2013 The Path to Commercialization of Drop-in Cellulosic Transportation Fuels. Rural America Revitalization

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

Trev Hall U.S. Department of Energy

Comparison of California Low Carbon Fuel Standard with Bush s 20 in 10 Alternative Fuel Standard

Overhauling Renewable Energy Markets

Discussing the Ratepayer Benefits of EVs On the Electrical Grid

Update: Estimated GHG Increase from Obama Administration Inaction on the 2014 RFS

Electricity Technology in a Carbon-Constrained Future

Impacts of Options for Modifying the Renewable Fuel Standard. Wallace E. Tyner Farzad Taheripour. Purdue University

Aviation Industry Roadmap to Sustainability. Thomas Rötger IATA

Updates. Pat Reiten President and CEO, PacifiCorp Transmission

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6416) City Council Staff Report

Economic Development Benefits of Plug-in Electric Vehicles in Massachusetts. Al Morrissey - National Grid REMI Users Conference 2017 October 25, 2017

1

California s Energy Storage Summit California Energy Storage Association and Association of California Water Agencies

California Transportation Electrification and the ZEV Mandate. Analisa Bevan Assistant Division Chief, ECARS November 2016

EV Strategy. OPPD Board Commitee Presentation May 2018 Aaron Smith, Director Operations

Biomass-based Diesel Policy Options: Larger RFS Requirements and Tax Credit Extension

Impact of Energy Efficiency and Demand Response on Electricity Demand

Renewable Fuels Regulations. Performance Report: December December 2012

LOW CARBON FUELS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA. BioCleantech Forum November 3, 2016

U.S. Department of Energy: Vehicle Technology and Infrastructure Deployment

A Global Solution for Sustainable Biofuels

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 222 PETROLEUM INDUSTRY OUTLOOK (July 1999)

Biofuels - Global Situation, Concerns and the Future

Feasibility of Establishing an E85 Fuelling Station in Oshawa

THE MULTI-STATE ZEV ACTION PLAN

Volkswagen Group of America Virginia Energy Conference Session 30: Fossil Fuels Diesel Developments Presented by Stuart Johnson, Engineering and

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

Published on Market Research Reports Inc. (

U.S. Ethanol Ready For The World Market

How will electric vehicles transform the copper industry? 14 March 2018

Status Review of California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard

Transcription:

NEW INDUSTRY STUDY THE IMPACT OF THE LCFS ON CALIFORNIA S TRANSPORTATION FUEL MARKET California s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) policy is designed to promote dramatic change in the state s transportation sector and liquid fuel markets. The regulation is already impacting refiners, consumers, blenders, traders and related companies. PIRA s latest study will offer insight into this complex policy approach and improve decision-making of key stakeholders.

The Impact of the LCFS on California's Transportation Fuel Market California s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) policy is designed to promote dramatic change in the state s transportation sector and liquid fuel markets. The regulation is already impacting refiners, consumers, blenders, traders and related companies. PIRA s multi-subscriber study offers a close assessment of the regulation (as it currently stands, with consideration of potential policy changes) projecting the composition of California s market for transportation energy use and in particular, demand and pricing of fuels over the next decade. The development of this program can also have broader implications, as other jurisdictions are considering implementation of such policies. PIRA s study offers insight into this complex policy approach and improve decision-making of key stakeholders. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has established a Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) designed to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in transportation fuels in order to fight climate change. All fuels are assigned carbon intensity (CI) values according to their GHG emissions over a life cycle. The program was readopted in late 2015, and key changes to the standards, CI methodology, and other program details were implemented during 2016. To comply with the law, fuel suppliers must reduce the CI of transportation fuels each year by specified percentages. A 3.5% decrease this year will increase sharply to 10% by 2020. The LCFS is very complex, consisting of hundreds of pages of regulations and related documents. New CI values underwent re-certification in 2016. A progress report is scheduled for later in 2017, with a full program review required in 2019. Complicating matters, the LCFS is a cornerstone policy for transportation sector reductions needed to meet Governor Jerry Brown s aggressive 2030 GHG target. Additional tightening is expected post-2020. 2020 Standards Gasoline 88.62 Diesel 91.81 CARBOB 0 20 40 60 80 100 In an attempt to offer compliance flexibly (and thus reduce the cost of achieving the goals) the LCFS -20% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 also establishes a credit system and allows for *Required reduction is current regulatory trajectory through 2020 with PIRA assumptions to 20251 trading. Given the serious challenges of achieving a 10% reduction in 2020, fuel suppliers are building a surplus (bank) of these credits in the early years of the program for future compliance use. After rising $100/MT from an average of $22 in May 2015 to $122 in February 2016, LCFS pricing fell last year and is currently around $96 as of. Diesel Corn Ethanol Cane Ethanol Cellulosic Ethanol Electricity Biodiesel Canola/Soybean Biodiesel & RD Corn Oil/Tallow Biodiesel & RD Used Cooking Oil 0% -10% Representative LCFS CI Values g/mj LNG/CNG Renewable Natural Gas RD = Renewable Diesel; CIs from Regulatory Lookup Tables or re-certified pathways for 2016 Projected Reductions in LCFS Carbon Intensity Will Not Hit Nominal Targets Projected CI Reduction vs. 2010 Baseline Required CI Reduction vs. 2010 Baseline* 3 Park Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY 10016-5989 t 1 212 686 6808 www.pira.com For authorized subscribers only. 2017 PIRA Energy Group. 1

The LCFS credit market is currently oversupplied, with a growing bank, in advance of accelerated tightening of the standards. Moreover, concerns over regulatory certainty increased this summer, with speculation that the LCFS could somehow be weakened/used as a bargaining chip to secure support for tightening and extending beyond 2020 the economy-wide cap trade program for California, Quebec and likely Ontario. Cost Containment for the LCFS is through the Credit Clearance Market, which imposes a cost threshold of $200/MT ($2016) and allows for the carryover of deficits that cannot be reconciled in a given year. $/MT $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 Trends in Daily LCFS Credit Prices Annual Average Pricing 2013 $ 57 2014 $ 30 2015 $ 53 2016 $102 Sep 2013 9 th Circuit Appellate Court ruling UPHOLDS the LCFS on Constitutional grounds June 2013 Court ruling UPHOLDS LCFS, but freezes it at 2013 levels pending re-adoption Market lull with LCFS frozen and re-adoption required Re-adoption in late 2015 after public consultation process LCFS perceived to be at risk, related to negotiations over extending the state s GHG target beyond 2020 There is a clear need for key stakeholders- fuel suppliers, biofuels producers, electric vehicles providers, CNG, LNG, and RNG suppliers to understand how the LCFS will work and how it will influence their businesses. PROJECT SCOPE The policy is intended to be technology neutral, rewarding approaches that offer greater reductions in CI. Electric vehicles, natural gas and biogas in transport, ethanol, cellulosic ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel, demand reductions are all potentially part of the policy solution offering a particularly wide open array of potential outcomes. The use of biofuels has been the key way of complying with the LCFS, because of their availability and low CI values. Low Carbon Fuel Standard credit generation for 2015 and the first three quarters of 2016 (the latest data available) is shown in the pie chart to the right. Ethanol and biomass-based diesel (conventional biodiesel plus renewable diesel) generated 87% of the LCFS credits. Total Credits (2015): 5.5 million LCFS Credit Generation Data Total Credits (Q1-Q3 2016): 6.1 million Note: Non-metered residential EV charging credits are issued in the February following the data year. Electricity reported so far in 2016 largely reflects off-road. RESEARCH FEATURES OF "IMPACT OF CALIFORNIA S LCFS The study features a review of the current market and annual forecasts to 2025 for the items shown below: Currently dominant California fuels gasoline and diesel consumption and prices. Volume of biofuels by product type to meet Federal and California regulatory requirements. LCFS assessments also include estimates of natural gas, biogas, electric vehicle and hydrogen usage for compliance. California carbon Cap and Trade Market Allowance price forecast offering additional price incentives to move away from fossil fuels in transport. 2

Prices of D4 (biomass-based diesel), D5 (advanced biofuels) and D6 (mostly corn-based ethanol) RINs. Forecast Prices of Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel A discussion of potential values of LCFS Credits STUDY DELIVERABLES AND TIMING Executive Summary (8 pgs.) Report in Power Point form including detailed charts and graphs of forecasts (101 slides) (Table of Contents at right) Excel data set available for download Webinar to discuss findings PIRA will present the final results and explain in depth the key takeaways of the study in a live (and later recorded) webinar on March 14, 2017. The results of the study will be addressed by its authors, who will discuss the specific market implications of these findings. Clients will have the opportunity to ask questions. Executive Summary 4 Introduction to California s LCFS LCFS Credit Generation Data LCFS Credit Price History Table of Contents The U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) 37 The EPA & RINs 43 Analysis & Supply/Demand Forecasts Electricity Credit Generation / EVs Biofuels Ethanol Biomass-Based Diesel Natural Gas Hydrogen LCFS Balances & Price Forecast 81 RIN Forecasts 87 Biofuel Price Forecasts 95 18 31 36 51 54 61 63 69 75 80 Custom Scenarios Please contact your PIRA sales representative if you are interested in PIRA developing tailored scenarios price to be determined. Workshop Option For an additional fee, buyers may choose to have a private (online or on-site) briefing of the study's findings. Such an option allows for a more thorough dialog with the study authors as well as some customization of the presentation. Arrangements (location, date, etc.) are made on a case-by-case basis. WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THE IMPACT OF LCFS ON CALIFORNIA FUEL SUPPLY? The following market participants can all benefit from this study: Energy companies- refiners, and gasoline/diesel producers-will be able to make better-informed decisions on where and when to secure biofuels, improving flexibility and diversifying for the sources for their businesses. This will forecast the value of the Carbon Fuel Credits and assist companies in determining how much they should bank for future years. Blenders, traders, storage companies, and shippers will be able to anticipate supply/demand changes. This analysis will aid in understanding business opportunities Biofuels manufacturers- ethanol, biodiesel and renewable diesel producers will be able to benefit from PIRA s forecasts better identify market opportunities. 3

Suppliers of CNG- particularly biogas manufacturers will be able to better understand the demand and pricing for their product. Electrical Vehicle Manufacturers-will be able to estimate the demand for their products. Technology Companies- offering processes for manufacturing low carbon intensity fuels will be able to identify investment and licensing opportunities. AUTHOR BIOS Roman Kramarchuk Managing Director Global Power, Emissions and Clean Energy Roman Kramarchuk is leading efforts to expand PIRA s environmental /emissions offerings to meet the demand of clients looking for a deeper focus on renewables, technology and policy across the globe. Roman heads up PIRA's Greenhouse Gas Emissions and North American Environmental Markets services, which focus on assessing environmental policies and implications for the energy sector, including specific environmental markets such as the California Cap and trade system. Prior to joining PIRA in 2005, he was at the U.S. EPA, developing key energy emissions regulations at the Clean Air Markets Division. With PG&E NEG and PA Consulting / PHB Hagler Bailly, he evaluated strategies regarding power sector fuel choice and capital investments and advised on asset valuation. Roman also worked on energy sector USAID- and World Bank-funded projects in the FSU and India. He has an M.P.P. from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and a B.A. in economics and B.S.E. in systems engineering from the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Bruce H. Pickover Senior Director Global Biofuels Dr. Bruce H. Pickover manages PIRA s Global Biofuels Retainer Service. He began his career at ExxonMobil where he worked on petrochemicals and the refinery/chemical interface. Bruce spent 27 years at consulting company Chem Systems, where he was responsible for the Petroleum and Petrochemical Economics (PPE) program, multi-subscriber reports, and commercial proprietary studies. Bruce has a Bachelor s of Chemical Engineering from the City College of New York and earned an M.Ch.E and a Ph.D. from New York University. Jennifer McIsaac Director Emissions and Clean Energy Jennifer McIsaac follows environmental and regulatory trends, contributing to regular reports on U.S. federal policy initiatives and regional carbon markets as well as conducting special analysis. Prior to joining PIRA in 2001, her experience in the energy industry included positions at NUI Corp., the parent company of several gas utilities, and at Exxon Company International. Ms. McIsaac has a B.A. in mathematics from Drew University and an M.A. in economics from Cornell University. Corey Lavinsky Director Global Biofuels Corey Lavinsky joined PIRA in 2009 and is responsible for tracking and analyzing world biofuels markets. He coauthors all of the team s reports, including Biofuels Weekly Update, Weekly Ethanol Supply Report, Global Biofuels Monthly Forecast, Biofuels in Developing Markets, and World Biofuels Forecast. Prior to joining PIRA, he was the CEO of Growthink Research, a venture capital research firm. He began his career as an attorney with a prestigious St. Louis law firm. He has a J.D. from the University of Missouri and a B.A. in mathematics from Binghamton University. 4

IMPACT OF THE LCFS ON CA'S TRASPORTATION FUEL MARKET STUDY PROSPECTUS The Impact of the LCFS on California's Transportation Fuel Market Complete the form below and email to PIRA at sales@pira.com. (Company Name) wishes to subscribe to the study "The Impact of the LCFS on California s Transportation Fuel Market." We understand and agree that the fees are as follows: The fee is $6,995 New York City-based companies, please add 8.875% sales tax; all other New York State companies, please add the city/county-appropriate sales tax. Name/Title: Company: Address: Phone/e-mail: Total Fee: Signature: Please e-mail or mail to: PIRA Energy Group Attn: Sales 2 Penn Plaza, 25 th Floor New York., NY 10121 T: 1 212 686 6808 E: sales@pira.com Note: The Impact of the LCFS on California s Transportation Fuel Market contains no confidential technical information, to the best knowledge of PIRA. However, except for information that is or becomes available to the public in printed publication, or is already in the possession of subscriber or developed independently by subscriber, or is received by subscriber in good faith from a third party, any information in the study is for the sole and confidential use of the subscriber. Subscribers agree to use reasonable efforts to protect the confidential nature of the information supplied to them as part of this study.