Case No IV/M Lucas / Varity. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/07/1996

Similar documents
Case No COMP/M DAIMLERCHRYSLER / DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Case No IV/M HAGEMEYER / ABB ASEA SKANDIA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 007/10/1997

Case No COMP/M GE / JENBACHER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 14/04/2003

Case No COMP/M INA / LUK. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/12/1999

Case No IV/M EDF / EDISON-ISE. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/06/1995

Case No IV/M Ford / Mazda. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/05/1996

&DVH 1R, <'52 6$*$ 5(*8/$7,21((&1R 0(5*(5352&('85( Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 05/07/1999

Case No COMP/M VOLKSWAGEN / SCANIA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 13/06/2008

Case No IV/M Texaco / Norsk Hydro. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 09/01/1995

Case No COMP/M PETROPLUS / EUROPEAN PETROLEUM HOLDINGS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M GENERAL MOTORS/ DELPHI STEERING BUSINESS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M ABB/ POWER-ONE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/07/2013

Case No IV/M NESTE / STATOIL. REGULATION (EEC)No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Case No COMP/M BRIDGESTONE / BANDAG. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/05/2007

Case No IV/M UNITED TECHNOLOGIES / SUNDSTRAND. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/05/1999

Case No COMP/M INDORAMA / SINTERAMA / TREVIRA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 09/06/2011

Case No COMP/M ABB / ELSAG BAILEY. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(2) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/12/1998

Case No COMP/M SGL CARBON / BREMBO / BCBS / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/05/2009

Case No COMP/M MAHLE / DANA EPG. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/03/2007

Case No COMP/M FIAT/ GM/ VM MOTORI JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/03/2011

Case No COMP/M SIEMENS / FLENDER. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/06/2005

Case No COMP/M VWFS/ PON HOLDINGS B.V./ PON EQUIPMENT RENTAL & LEASE

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/17/015 AVANACAR (BRIGHTSTONE TRADING)/CITROËN DUBLIN

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/14/013 -

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/006 VALERO ENERGY (IRELAND) / RIVERSIDE SERVICE STATION

Case No COMP/M THYSSENKRUPP / EADS / ATLAS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/05/2006

: D Lewis (Presiding Member), Y Carrim (Tribunal Member) and N Manoim (Tribunal Member). Reasons

Revised mandate to CEN for standardization in the field of recreational craft.

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Reasons for Decision

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

ECOMP.3.A EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2018 (OR. en) 2018/0220 (COD) PE-CONS 67/18 ENT 229 MI 914 ENV 837 AGRI 596 PREP-BXT 58 CODEC 2164

Official Journal of the European Union

MINUTES. OF THE 1st MEETING TYPE-APPROVAL AUTHORITIES EXPERT GROUP - TAAEG * * *

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. Porsche Automobil Holding SE Acquiring Firm

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION. Quality of petrol and diesel fuel used for road transport in the European Union

Official Journal of the European Communities

Draft COMMISSION DECISION

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA ROADSPAN HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD

(Text with EEA relevance)

12042/16 MGT/NC/ra DGE 2

Whereas pursuant to Article 4b of Regulation (EEC) No 3164/76, as inserted by Regulation (EEC) No 1841/88, the Council must adopt the measures

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 11 December /3/06 REV 3 ADD 1. Interinstitutional File: 2003/ 0153(COD) ENT 84 CODEC 561

Case No IV/M RWE-DEA / AUGUSTA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/07/1995

(Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION COMMISSION DECISION. of 14 February 1995

Low Sulphur Fuel Oils Preliminary Estimated Costs to Canadian Industry based on European Data

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

FEDIOL assessment of the practical implications of mandatory country of origin labelling options on the vegetable oils sector 1

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Respect for customers, partners and staff. Service: another name for the respect that a company owes its customers, partners and staff.

Introduction of the Digital Tachograph

Case No COMP/M.2139 Bombardier/ADtranz. Only the English text is authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

EU-Mexico Free Trade Agreement EU TEXTUAL PROPOSAL

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Proportion of the vehicle fleet meeting certain emission standards

12468/10 SJC/fp 1 DG I 1A

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

February 13, Docket No. ER ; ER Response to Request for Additional Information

Eurocode 3 Design of steel structures

AMENDMENTS TO BUNKER DELIVERY NOTE TO PERMIT THE SUPPLY OF FUEL OIL NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION 14 OF MARPOL ANNEX VI

DIRECTIVE 2006/40/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX

Eurocode 3 Design of steel structures

CMP294: National Grid Legal Separation changes to CUSC Section 14. CUSC Modification Proposal Form

July 16, 2014 Page 2 of 9 Model Year Jeep Liberty (KJ) , , , , , ,997 Model Year Jeep Gr

Analysis of BMW against Audi and Toyota. Name of student: Admission: Course: Institution: Instructor: Date of Submission:

VOLUNTARY CODE OF PRACTICE FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC) OF MOTOR VEHICLES (13 October 2014)

Eurocode 3 Design of steel structures

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC)

Official Journal L 076, 22/03/2003 P

EU TOY DIRECTIVE 2009/48/EC: OVERVIEW - REGULATORY CONTEXT AND MAJOR CHANGES

OBLIGATION TO FIT ISOFIX ANCHORAGES. (Discussion paper)

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Position Paper. Anti-lock Braking for Agricultural Tractors

ZF, UBS and innogy Innovation Hub Announce the Jointly Developed Blockchain Car ewallet

HyLAW. HyDrail Rail Applications Assessment. Main Author(s): [Dainis Bošs, Latvian Hydrogen association] Contributor(s):

Establishment of Joint Venture with PSA for EV Traction Motor Business

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Case no.: 109/LM/Nov05. In the large merger between: Chemical Services Limited. and.

AGREEMENT. (Revision 2, including the amendments entered into force on 16 October 1995) Addendum 102: Regulation No. 103

CEMA position on draft braking regulation, 4 June 2008 ENTR/F1/ /rev16

* * * Brussels, 20th October 2012

Eurocode 1 Actions on structures

Revision 1. Incorporating all valid text up to: Supplement 5 to the original version of the Regulation Date of entry into force: 7 December 2002

ANNEX MOTOR VEHICLES AND MOTOR VEHICLES' PARTS. Article 1. General Provisions

A comparison of the impacts of Euro 6 diesel passenger cars and zero-emission vehicles on urban air quality compliance

THE ISSUE AND USE OF SECTION 10B PERMITS FOR ROAD PASSENGER TRANSPORT AND MINIBUS DRIVING IN NORTHERN IRELAND

Implementation Plan PRC Transmission Relay Loadability Project Phase II Relay Loadability

GLOBAL REGISTRY. Addendum. Global technical regulation No. 10 OFF-CYCLE EMISSIONS (OCE) Appendix

ANNEX MOTOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT AND PARTS THEREOF. Article 1. Definitions

(Text with EEA relevance)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT & TECHNOLOGY Magazine, July 1998

Delegations will find attached document D036128/02.

Economic and Social Council

RESOLUTION MEPC.278(70) (Adopted on 28 October 2016) AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNEX OF THE PROTOCOL OF 1997 TO AMEND THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE

New Batteries Directive Version 4 December 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Table of contents. Page ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TABLE OF TABLES TABLE OF FIGURES

Transcription:

EN Case No IV/M.768 - Lucas / Varity Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/07/1996 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 396M0768 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Brussels, 11.07.1996 PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION Registered letter with advice of delivery: To the notifying parties Dear Sirs, Subject : Case No IV/M.768 - LUCAS / VARITY Notification of 10.6.1996 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 1. The companies Lucas Industries plc, Solihull/UK ("Lucas"), and Varity Corporation, Buffalo, New York/USA ("Varity"), notified that they intend to enter into a full merger. Under the terms of the merger a new UK holding company, to be known as LucasVarity plc, will be created. The Lucas shareholders will own about 62% and the Varity shareholders about 38% of the new merged business. 2. After the examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 ("Merger Regulation") and does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the functioning of the EEA Agreement. I. THE PARTIES 3. Lucas designs, manufactures and sales advanced technology systems and components for the automotive and aerospace industry, in particular braking systems, diesel fuel injection systems as well as electrical and electronic systems. In its last business year, ended July 1995, the company had a worldwide turnover of about ECU 3.5 billion, about ECU 2.5 billion of it was generated within the Community. Rue de la Loi 200 - B-1049 Brussels - Belgium Telephone: exchange (+32-2)299.11.11 Telex: COMEU B 21877 - Telegraphic address: COMEUR Brussels

- 2-4. Varity is predominantly active in the manufacture of braking systems and anti-lock systems (through its subsidiary Kelsey-Hayes) as well in the manufacture of diesel engines (through VarityPerkins). Besides that, Varity through its subsidiary VarityZecal is active in the development of a patented process of additive plating of copper to ceramic substrates. In its last business year, ended January 1996, the company had a worldwide turnover of about ECU 1.8 billion, of which ECU 584 million was generated within the Community. II. THE OPERATION 5. The parties have signed a transaction agreement by which they will enter into a full merger of their businesses. Under the terms of the agreement a new UK holding company, to be known as LucasVarity plc, will be created. The Lucas shareholders will own about 62% and the Varity shareholders about 38% of the new merged business. Ultimately the new company will own all the assets of both Lucas and Varity. III. CONCENTRATION 6. The merger between two previously independent undertakings, Lucas and Varity, will constitute a concentration according to Article 3(1)(a) of the Merger Regulation. IV. COMMUNITY DIMENSION 7. The combined aggregate worldwide turnover of Lucas and Varity exceeds ECU 5,000 million. Each of the undertakings has a Community-wide turnover in excess of ECU 250 million, but they do not achieve more than two-thirds of their aggregate Community-wide turnover within one and the same Member State. The notified operation therefore has a Community dimension according to Article 1(2) of the Merger Regulation. V. COMPATIBILITY WITH THE COMMON MARKET 8. Although the merged entity will enter a rank within the world's top ten component suppliers for the automotive industry as well for the aerospace industry the parties' activities are mostly complementary both with respect to the affected product markets and to the geographical markets. The proposed operation will not result in any addition of market shares in the component markets for the aerospace industry, in the electrical and electronic systems business and in the field of additive plating of copper to ceramic substrates since there is no overlap with respect to the activities of Lucas and Varity. Against that both parties are active in the diesel systems business and in the braking systems business. Relevant product markets 9. For the case under consideration one can distinguish the overall diesel systems business into the markets for the manufacture of diesel engines and of diesel fuel injection systems. The overall market for diesel engines then has to be divided further into the distinct markets for the manufacture of diesel engines for cars and of diesel engines for

- 3 - off-highway vehicles for agricultural, industrial and marine uses. These markets are characterized by particular requirements for power, application characteristics, legislative compliance, specific types of customers etc. According to the power range of diesel engines the market could be divided further into distinct sub-markets, for instance small (up to 40 horsepower), medium (40 to 300 horsepower) and large diesel engines (more than 300 horsepower). However, the question of the definition of the relevant product markets can be left open to that extent, because even in the narrowest market the proposed concentration would not create or strengthen a dominant position. 10. With regard to the braking business one has to distinguish hydraulic braking systems for light vehicles (cars and light commercial vehicles) and air brakes for heavy commercial vehicles (trucks, buses and off-road vehicles) (1). Both markets have to be divided further according to the different uses and product characteristics into the markets for "actuation systems" and for "foundation brakes" (2). Foundation brakes again consist of several different components (disc brakes, drum brakes) that, from a customers point of view, belong to separate product markets. 11. Within the line followed in several cases anti-lock systems for light vehicles and for heavy commercial vehicles constitute separate product markets (3). Relevant geographic market 12. For the case under consideration the geographical scope of the relevant product markets is assumed to be EEA-wide. There are no apparent reasons for dividing markets on a national basis. Local production is not a necessary precondition for determining market positions in individual Member States and the costs for transportation and freight within the EEA are of minor importance. Assessment Diesel systems 13. Lucas Diesel systems is the world second largest manufacturer of diesel fuel injection systems. In Europe, Lucas manufactures diesel fuel injection systems in plants in France, UK and Spain. According to the parties, Lucas reaches the second rank in Europe having a market share of about 29%. Market leader is the German company Bosch with a market share of more than 50%. Smaller competitors in Europe are Stanadyne, Caterpillar and Cummins. Since Varity does not manufacture diesel fuel injection systems the proposed merger will not result in any addition of market shares to that extent. 14. Varity through its subsidiary Perkins manufactures a comprehensive array of multicylinder water-cooled diesel engines in the 7 to 2,500 horsepower range in United Kingdom and purchases diesel fuel injection systems for its engines in the 30 to 600 horsepower range from Lucas. According to the parties, VarityPerkins' market share in 1 See case No IV/M.148 - Lucas/Eaton, points 25 and 28; No IV/M.726 - Bosch/Allied Signal, point 9. 2 See case IV/M.337 - Knorr-Bremse/Allied-Signal, points 21 et seq.; No. IV/M.726 - Bosch/Allied Signal, point 11. 3 See case No IV/M.726 - Bosch/Allied Signal, point 14.

- 4 - Europe does not exceed 25%. Sizeable competitors are Cummins, Deutz, Caterpillar and John Deere each having a market share of at least 10%. Since Lucas does not manufacture diesel engines the proposed merger will not result in any addition of market shares to that extent. 15. However, through the proposed merger Lucas and Varity will vertically integrate their diesel businesses. This link between one of the leading suppliers of diesel fuel injection systems with the leading supplier of diesel engines will result in a reduction of independent sources of supply with regard to diesel fuel injection systems. However, since there will be at least two independent sources of supply left, Bosch and Standyne, and two manufacturer of diesel engines, Cummins and Capterpillar, also produce diesel fuel injection systems the merger is unlikely to result in a foreclosure effect in the market for diesel fuel injection systems. Braking systems 16. The European markets for "actuation systems" and for "foundation brakes" for light vehicles are highly concentrated. Varity does not manufacture "actuation systems" and has not hitherto sold "foundation brakes" into the European market. In the OEM/OESmarket for "actuation systems" Lucas reaches the third rank behind the leading ITT/Teves and Bosch. In the component markets for "foundation brakes" Lucas has the leading position followed by ITT and Bosch. Since Varity is not active in these markets the market shares of Lucas will not be affected by the merger. The new entity will face strong competition from the other integrated brakes manufacturers Bosch and ITT. On both markets the suppliers face significant buying power from their customers in the automotive industry (4). In addition, several components for the foundation brakes (front and rear disc brakes, drum brakes) are still produced by the car manufactures themselves (in-house production). 17. In the European markets for air brakes for heavy commercial vehicles Lucas has the leading position with a market share of between 40% and 50% (5). Sizeable competitors in this markets are Knorr-Bremse, Rockwell, WABCO (Perrot) and Eaton. Since Varity has not hitherto sold heavy duty brakes into the European market the market shares of Lucas will not be affected by the merger. Approximately 51% of total European demand for heavy duty brakes is still met by in-house production by vehicle manufacturers, although the balance is progressively shifting towards out-sourcing (6). 18. The European market for anti-lock systems (ABS) for light vehicles is characterized by the strong market position of the leading Bosch and the following ITT/Teves. The sales of both companies account for more than 80% of the EEA market volume. Although Varity through its subsidiary Kelsey-Hayes is the world's largest producer of anti-lock braking systems the companies' current market share in Europe is just under 5%. Kelsey- Hayes has set up a production plant for ABS in Heerlen/NL and seeks to increase its market share. Lucas has only minor ABS activities both with regard to Europe as well on a worldwide level. It is expected that the proposed merger will provide the new entity the potential to compete effectively with the leading integrated brakes manufacturers. The 4 See case No IV/M.726 - Bosch/Allied Signal, points 41 et seq.. 5 See case No IV/M.149 - LUCAS/EATON, point 36. 6 See case No IV/M.149 - LUCAS/EATON, point 37.

- 5 - proposed merger therefore - in the long-term - will have a positive effect on the conditions of competition in Europe. VI. CONCLUSION 19. It follows from the above that the proposed concentration would not create or strengthen a dominant position as a result of which competition would be significantly impeded in the common market or in a substantial part of it. 20. For the above reasons, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the functioning of the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. For the Commission,