Road Transport Emission Factors and Fleet Data Information from the National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory

Similar documents
Emission Factor Toolkit (EFTv5.2c) User Guide January 2013

Atmosphere and Local Environment. Trends in NO X /NO 2 emissions and ambient measurements in the UK

Vehicle Emissions Remote Sensing Preliminary results from Measurements on A472 Hafod Road

Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT. Remote Sensing Vehicle Emissions

VEPM 5.3. Vehicle Emission Prediction Model update: Technical report. Prepared for NZ Transport Agency. April 2017

NO x and NO 2 concentrations, trends and sources

NOx Emissions from Modern Diesel Vehicles. Dr Ben Marner

Deriving Background Concentrations of NOx and NO 2 April 2016 Update

LAEI 2013 Non-road transport emission estimates

Environmental Impact of Taxis Is there a Business Case for Hybrids. Dr James Tate, Institute for Transport Studies

Trends in air pollution and emissions projections

L O W E M I S S I O N CITY

ONE YEAR ON: THE IMPACTS OF THE LONDON CONGESTION CHARGING SCHEME ON VEHICLE EMISSIONS

Overview of Changes Introduced by EFT V7.0 and by CURED V2A

London Buses Emissions Reduction. Finn Coyle Environmental Manager, Transport Emissions

RHA NOx Emission Assessment 2018

COPERT 4 v7.1. Dimitrios Gkatzoflias Chariton Kouridis Giorgos Mellios Leon Ntziachristos

Low Emission Vehicle Policy Development in London

Modelling LEZ and Demand Management measures in the City of York using Detailed Traffic-Emission Tools

The Low Emissions Toolkit

Low Emissions Towns and Cities Programme

NewcastleGateshead Low Emission Zone Feasibility Study

Department for Transport. Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG) Unit Values of Time and Operating Costs

Deriving Background Concentrations of NOx and NO 2 for Use with CURED V3A

Jon Andersson, Ricardo UK Ltd. Edinburgh, January 24 th Ricardo plc 2015

2014 AEIG. Road Transport Chapter Update. Ghent,

Low Emission Strategies Sussex-DEFRA Seminar, March 2011

French - IFSTTAR activities

Proposals for an Ultra Low Emission Zone

The CONOX project: Pooling, sharing and analyzing European remote sensing data

Ricardo-AEA. Passenger car and van CO 2 regulations stakeholder meeting. Sujith Kollamthodi 23 rd May

The impact of CO 2 reducing tax policies on NO X emissions from passenger cars

EMISSION FACTORS FROM EMISSION MEASUREMENTS. VERSIT+ methodology Norbert Ligterink

New methodological elements. EMISIA workshop, 27 May 2016, Lyon, France

NSW Fleet Forecast for Tunnel Ventilation Design: 2016 to 2040

The role of biomethane transport fuel Update from the Department for Transport

REMOTE SENSING RDE: ITS, University of Leeds UK urban Air Quality exceedance areas: 2007 present > 1 million pass-by measurements

Eric Ling, Committee on Climate Change Secretariat

Riccardo Enei «The coach of the future study : preliminary results» IRU Conference

VEHICLE EMISSIONS. ITF-SEDEMA workshop in Mexico City Norbert Ligterink

Capabilities of Emission Control Technologies and their Impact on Air Quality. Expert Meeting of the EU Refining Forum Brussels 1 December 2017

NGC Emissions Calculator Methodology (United Kingdom)

METHODOLOGIES FOR CALCULATING ROAD TRAFFIC EMISSIONS IN MILAN

Project Appraisal Guidelines for National Roads Unit National Parameters Values Sheet

Technical support to the correlation of CO 2 emissions measured under NEDC and WLTP Ref: CLIMA.C.2/FRA/2012/0006

Research. White Paper: Segway i2 Personal Transporter Carbon Footprint Calculation (Update)

Diesel engines on the pathway to low impact on local air quality in Europe

Some Comments on Air Quality Nitrogen Oxide

Bus and coach transport for greening mobility

Street emission ceilings (SEC) project

Introduction to the Ultra Low Emission Zone

This is a repository copy of Real Driving Emissions (RDE): Results from the 2015 remote sensing campaigns (UK).

Volume 8, ISSN (Online), Published at:

Air quality at Heathrow Airport

Innovation in London. Policy approaches to mobility management and sustainable travel. Transport for London

Use of Big Data for Vehicle Kilometres. Noreen Dorgan CSO Ireland April 2018

New results from a 2015 PEMS testing campaign on a Diesel Euro 6b vehicle

Learning Legacy Document

Technology Implementation for Low Carbon HGVs. Andy Eastlake - MD Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership LCV 10 Sep 2014

COPERT - SIBYL workshop October 2015 Brussels, Belgium Diesel NOx emissions

Evaluation of the effectiveness of measures to improve quality air applied in Northern and Central Europe. Claire Holman, Roy Harrison, Xavier Querol

European Urban Transport Roadmaps to 2030

Low Emission Zones in Germany

Emissions source apportionment Putney High Street

Real Driving Emissions

Energy in transports: quantification of impacts

Recent Development of On- Board Vehicle Emissions Measurements in Hong Kong

Newcastle/Gateshead Low Emission Zone Feasibility Study

TACKLING POLLUTION AND CONGESTION

USE OF VEHICLE FLEET DATA FOR ON-ROAD MOBILE SOURCES EMISSION INVENTORIES

The Low Emission Zone

Evaluating opportunities for soot-free, low-carbon bus fleets in Brazil: São Paulo case study

Where do Euro 6 cars stand? Nick Molden 29 April 2015

NGC Emissions Calculator Methodology (United Kingdom)

Emissions Control Technologies for Mobile Pollution Sources

This is a repository copy of Some Observations Based on Complementary International Evaluations of Edar Vehicle Emissions Remote Sensing Technology.

Technical Committee Motor Vehicles 15 September RDE 3 discussion

Upgrading City Buses to Reduce NOx Emissions

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

EURO 6d Diesel Performance & Impact on Urban Air Quality

Congestion Charging in London

Evolution of Advanced Emissions Control System to meet NOx and Particulates Regulations

SNAP CODES:

SCC Greenhouse Gas Assessment

Proportion of the vehicle fleet meeting certain emission standards

Reducing CO 2 emissions from vehicles by encouraging lower carbon car choices and fuel efficient driving techniques (eco-driving)

Urban Air Quality and Diesel Cars

BUS SERVICES IN CHAMBERLAYNE ROAD NW10

Final Report. Rail Emission Model. November AEA Technology i

Toyota. Stephen Stacey - General Manager Arjan Dijkhuizen - Senior Engineer. Government & Technical Affairs Toyota Motor Europe TOYOTA MOTOR EUROPE

Put yourself in the driving seat

The Air Quality Improvement Measures in Seoul Metropolitan Area

Comparing unit emissions from on-road remote sensing with HBEFA

REAL WORLD DRIVING. Fuel Efficiency & Emissions Testing. Prepared for the Australian Automobile Association

Vehicle emissions prediction model (VEPM 5.3) user guide. Version 2.0, April 2018

Real-Driving Emissions test programme results from a Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV)

THE UK RAIL MARKET 2015

AIR QUALITY DETERIORATION IN TEHRAN DUE TO MOTORCYCLES

Effectiveness of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Validated by Analysis of Real World Driving Data

LowC VP. Transport Roadmaps. A guide to low carbon vehicle, energy and infrastructure roadmaps. Prepared by Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership

Transcription:

Road Transport Emission Factors and Fleet Data Information from the National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory Tim Murrells DMUG Meeting London 5 th December 2012

Introduction NO x emission factors Reasons for change What are the changes? Fleet composition Evidence What are the changes? PM, HC emission factors Factors for alternative vehicle technologies

Recent Trends in Roadside NO x Concentrations David Carslaw et al, 2011 Concentrations have been flat or weakly downward over the past 6-8 years

NO x ktonnes/yr) Recent Trends in Roadside NO x Concentrations Trend in conc.: -0.5% to -2%/year 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Mcycle Bus Artic HGV Rigid HGV Diesel LGV Petrol LGV Diesel car Petrol car Trends implied by UK inventory up to 2009 were not consistent with observations Trend in emissions: -6%/year

NO x Trends at Roadside Sites in European Cities

Approach in NAEI 2009 2009 version of NAEI published in early 2011 NAEI used average DfT/TRL (2009) speed-related emission factors for different vehicle types, fuels and Euro standards with DfT traffic flow data and national fleet composition data Why cannot emission inventories explain trends in roadside NO x concentrations? Have Euro standards delivered expected improvements? Are real-world emission factors dependent on technologies?

Alternative Sources of Emission Factors for Road Transport in Europe New factors published in 2010/2011 COPERT 4 Supported by European Environment Agency for national inventory reporting under CLRTAP EMEP/CORINAIR Emissions Inventory Guidebook www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-emission-inventory-guidebook-2009/part-b-sectoral-guidancechapters/1-energy/1-a-combustion/1-a-3-b-road-transport.pdf Average speed-related emission factors similar in style to UKEF COPERT 4 v8.1/v9 (November 2011) HBEFA v3.1 Swiss/German Handbook of Emission Factors (January 2010) Factors for many different traffic situations

NO x Emission Factors: Diesel Cars UKEF refer to previous factors used in NAEI up to 2009 version developed in 2010/11

Remote Sensing of Vehicle Emissions Carslaw et al, King s College 2011

NOx (g/km) @ 31 kph Urban NO x Emission Factor: Diesel Cars 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 UKEF COPERT RSD 0.4 0.2 0 Euro 1 Euro 2 Euro 3 Euro 4 UKEF refer to previous factors used in NAEI up to 2009 version developed in 2010/11

NOx emission factor (g/km) NO x Emission Factors: Diesel Cars 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 COPERT 4 factors Euro standard 0.4 0.2 0 Euro 1 Euro 2 Euro 3 Euro 4 Euro 5

NO x Emissions for Euro V Heavy Duty Vehicles with SCR vs EGR NOx (g/km) 20,0 15,0 10,0 5,0 SCR EGR Emission Standard 0,0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Speed (km/h) Source: COPERT 4 manual (European Environment Agency, 2011)

UK Fleet Composition - ANPR Data Automatic Number Plate Recognition data from DfT for 256 sites in UK grouped into different road types for each year from 2007-2010 Road Type England Scotland Wales Northern Ireland Total urban 82 16 8 5 111 rural 82 16 8 14 120 motorway 20 2 2 1 25 Total 184 34 18 20 256 Tells us: the age/euro mix of the fleet as seen on the road The petrol/diesel car mix on different types of roads

Diesel Car Mix on UK Roads in 2009: Previous NAEI Assumptions vs ANPR Evidence % diesel cars on road 60% 50% 50% 40% 41% 33% 35% 43% 30% 28% 20% 10% 0% NAEI urban rural m-way ANPR Previous NAEI fleet based on vehicle licensing data, travel surveys and assumptions about annual mileage - used to split km travelled by cars

% Euro standards on urban roads Euro Standard Mix for Cars on UK Urban Roads in 2009: Previous NAEI Assumptions vs ANPR data 100% 90% 80% 70% 57.6% 57.8% 52.5% 56.4% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 18.9% 19.2% 37.8% 34.5% 18.2% 17.8% 4.6% 4.2% 7.1% 6.9% 2.5% 2.0% NAEI ANPR NAEI ANPR Petrol car Diesel car Euro 1 Euro 2 Euro 3 Euro 4 ANPR data indicate fleets for LGVs and HGVs are newer than previously assumed in NAEI fleet. ANPR-based fleet data incorporated into latest NAEI

NAEI Road Transport Emission Factors and Fleet Data http://naei.defra.gov.uk/data_warehouse.php Speed-emission factor equations for all vehicle classes Guidance on emission degradation calculation

NAEI Road Transport Fleet Data Basic fleet mix: 2008-2035 from DfT 2011 traffic (vkm) projections England (exc London) London Scotland Wales N Ireland 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 England Urban Petrol car 56.1% 55.2% 53.6% 50.1% 47.7% 45.4% 43.3% 41.3% (outside London) Diesel car 26.0% 26.7% 28.1% 31.3% 33.4% 35.4% 37.3% 39.0% Petrol LGV 0.8% 0.7% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% Diesel LGV 11.5% 11.8% 12.2% 12.5% 12.8% 13.1% 13.4% 13.6% Rigid 1.7% 1.7% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 2.0% 2.0% Artic 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% Bus and coach 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3% Motorcycle 1.9% 1.9% 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% Rural Petrol car 51.9% 51.3% 50.0% 46.3% 43.8% 41.4% 39.2% 37.1% Diesel car 27.1% 27.5% 28.7% 31.9% 33.9% 35.9% 37.7% 39.4% Petrol LGV 0.9% 0.8% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% Diesel LGV 13.0% 13.3% 13.8% 14.1% 14.5% 14.8% 15.1% 15.5% Rigid 3.0% 3.0% 2.9% 3.1% 3.2% 3.4% 3.6% 3.7% Artic 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% Bus and coach 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% Motorcycle 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% Motorway Petrol car 42.7% 42.9% 42.0% 37.8% 35.0% 32.3% 29.8% 27.5% Diesel car 32.4% 32.1% 33.0% 36.7% 39.0% 41.2% 43.3% 45.2% Petrol LGV 0.8% 0.7% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% Diesel LGV 11.2% 11.4% 11.7% 12.1% 12.5% 12.8% 13.2% 13.5% Rigid 4.2% 4.1% 4.1% 4.4% 4.7% 5.0% 5.3% 5.6% Artic 7.9% 7.8% 7.8% 7.6% 7.4% 7.3% 7.1% 7.0% Bus and coach 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% Motorcycle 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%

NAEI Road Transport Fleet Data Fleet mix by Euro class: 2008-2035 Petrol cars, diesel cars, petrol LGVs, diesel LGVs, rigid HGVs, artic HGVs, buses and coaches, mopeds and motorcycles Inside, outside London Fleet mix by engine size (cars and motorcycles) vehicle weight (HGVs and buses) catalyst status (OK or failed) Euro V HDVs: SCR or EGR Detailed fleet data for London from TfL LGVs HGVs Buses (by technology) Taxis

Example: Fleet Projections for Cars 1. UK Car Fleet Composition Projections - Proportion of VKM by Euro Standard and Catalyst Status 1a) UK - Petrol Cars Fleet Composition - All Pollutants Note: When the catalyst of a petrol car is failed, emission factors for Pre-Euro 1 are assumed. Petrol cars Euro Standard Catalyst Status 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Pre-Euro 1 NA 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - - Euro 1 OK 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - FAIL 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - Euro 2 OK 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 FAIL 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Euro 3 OK 0.39 0.42 0.40 0.38 0.35 0.31 0.26 0.21 0.16 0.12 0.08 0.05 0.03 FAIL 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Euro 4 OK 0.25 0.34 0.37 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.32 0.30 0.29 0.26 0.22 0.18 0.13 FAIL 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Euro 5 OK - - 0.04 0.11 0.19 0.28 0.36 0.37 0.35 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.26 FAIL - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Euro 6 OK - - - - - - - 0.07 0.17 0.27 0.37 0.47 0.56 FAIL - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 ALL 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1b) UK - Diesel Cars Fleet Composition - NOx Calculations Note: Failure rates of SCR system apply only to Euro 6 diesel cars and LGVs; when the SCR system is failed, NOx emission factors for Euro 5 are assumed. Diesel cars Euro Standard Catalyst Status 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Pre-Euro 1 NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - - - Euro 1 NA 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - Euro 2 NA 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Euro 3 NA 0.43 0.37 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.19 0.16 0.12 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 Euro 4 NA 0.45 0.53 0.54 0.47 0.41 0.36 0.32 0.28 0.25 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.11 Euro 5 NA - - 0.07 0.20 0.32 0.43 0.51 0.49 0.44 0.40 0.36 0.33 0.30 Euro 6 OK - - - - - - - 0.09 0.21 0.32 0.41 0.49 0.57 FAIL - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 ALL 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 This information is embedded in Emission Factor Toolkit

Urban Road Transport NO X Emissions Relative to 2002 Change relative to 2002 emissions 1.2 1 0.8 Trend to 20 0.6 0.4 0.2 NAEI09 Updated NOX EFs Final NAEI10 Trend to 2008: -6 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Use of new emission factors and fleet data still does not close the gap between trends in emissions and roadside concentrations

Emissions trend relative to 2003 Trend in NO x emissions on roads nearest each AURN monitoring site in London 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 Croydon - Purley Way Enfield - Derby Road Greenwich - Blackheath Greenwich - Trafalgar Road Greenwich and Bexley - Falconwood Haringey - Haringey Town Hall Hounslow - Chiswick High Road Kensington and Chelsea - Cromwell Road Kensington and Chelsea - Kings Road Kensington and Chelsea - Knightsbridge Lewisham - New Cross Richmond Upon Thames - Castlenau Tower Hamlets - Mile End Road Watford (Roadside) Westminster - Marylebone Road 2010 NAEI - Urban RT emissions 0.2 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

PM 10 (g/km) at 31kph PM 10 (g/km) at 31 kph Exhaust Emission Factors for PM: NAEI vs COPERT 4 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 Diesel cars NAEI COPERT COPERT factors for PM lead to similar trends in road transport emissions compared with current DfT/TRL factors used in NAEI and EFT 0 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 Pre Euro 1 Euro 2 Euro 3 Euro 4 Euro 5 Euro 6 Euro 1 Diesel LGVs NAEI COPERT Many more contributions to roadside PM makes it more difficult to use roadside measurements to verify exhaust emission inventory trends 0 Pre Euro 1 Euro 2 Euro 3 Euro 4 Euro 5 Euro 6 Euro 1 Increasing importance of non-exhaust PM

Exhaust Emission Factors for NMVOCs: NAEI vs COPERT 4 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 Petrol cars NAEI COPERT COPERT factors for HCs are generally lower for most vehicle classes (but not every) compared with current DfT/TRL factors used in NAEI and EFT and lead to lower overall road transport emissions 0.05 0.00 Euro 1 Euro 2 Euro 3 Euro 4 Euro 5 Euro 6 Verification work by Dick Derwent - trends in HC measurements at Marylebone Road tend to support the road transport inventory

Trends in Hydrocarbon Concentrations at Marylebone Road Dick Derwent published in RoTAP report (2012)

Vehicle Technologies We are entering an era where knowledge of emission standard is not enough information to model traffic emission Even for conventional petrol and diesel vehicles, a wider range of technologies are used to meet standards, improve fuel efficiencies E.g. SCR vs EGR Low carbon technologies Different types same CO 2 performance, different air pollutant emissions, different cycle dependence Alternative fuels National uptake rates who knows?

Emission Factors for Alternative Vehicle Technologies and Fuels Literature review Information from TfL EMEP Emissions Inventory Guidebook (where possible) Scaling factors (or g/km emission factors) developed for different technologies relative to conventional petrol or diesel equivalent NO x, PM, CO 2

Emission Factors for Alternative Vehicle Technologies and Fuels Passenger cars Full hybrid electric (Toyota Prius) Plug-in hybrid electric E85 bioethanol LPG HGVs Buses Retrofit DPF B100 biodiesel Retrofit DPF Retrofit SCR Retrofit SCR TfL performance standards B100 biodiesel CNG/biogas Hybrid electric

Emission Factors for Alternative Vehicle Technologies and Fuels In some cases, very difficult to pin down a factor with any certainty Few measurements high uncertainty Variation in engineering design for notionally the same technology brings high variability in emission performance, even directional change. Dependent on drive cycle Hybridisation Not always certain what vehicles and cycles the emissions information reported in the literature can be compared against Retrofit technology - performance specification? TfL and London buses

Emission Factors for Alternative Vehicle Technologies and Fuels Example for passenger cars :NO x Vehicle Type Alternative fuel / technology Full hybrid electric vehicle (petrol HEV) Emission factors [g/km] Scaling factors Urban Rural Mway Urban Rural Mway Relative to Model Year Data source 2005-2009 - - - 0.2 0.7 0.9 Euro 4 petrol Average scaling factors calculated from 2009 EEA Emission Inventory Guidebook (June 2010) emission factors for full hybrid car at typical average speeds Comment Based on measurements for a Toyota Prius. These are the only data available and it cannot necessarily be assumed that other models will achieve the same reduction in emissions 2010- - - - 0.2 0.7 0.9 Euro 5 petrol Assumes emission scaling same as for Euro 4 Passenger car/van Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (petrol-phev) 2010- - - - 0.1 0.5 0.9 Euro 5 petrol Based on study by Helms et al (2010) "Electric vehicle and plug-in hybrid energy efficiency and life cycle", http://www.ifeu.org/verkehrundumwelt/pdf/he lms%20et%20al.%20(2010)%20electric%20vehicl es%20(tap%20conference%20paper).pdf emissions No emission measurements available. Estimated from assumptions about the fraction of distance likely to be done under electric motor on each road type Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) All 0 0 0 - - - - Zero emissions. Refers to emissions at point of use, not full fuel-cycle emissions All 0 0 0 - - - - Zero emissions. Refers to emissions at point of use, not full fuel-cycle emissions Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle (FCEV) E85 Bioethanol All - - - 1 1 1 Emissions from fossil fuel petrol AQEG (2011) report on biofuels Based on previous NAEI report reviewing impact of biofuels on AQ emissions 1994-1996 0.317 0.292 0.326 - - - - 1997-2000 0.114 0.105 0.117 - - - - The Guidebook provides speed-related emission functions and the following speeds (30, 60 and 70 mph) have been used to derive the emission factors for urban, rural and motorway as shown here.. Passenger car LPG 2001-2005 0.076 0.070 0.078 - - - - 2006-2010 0.041 0.038 0.042 - - - - 2009 EEA Emission Inventory Guidebook (June 2010) 2011-2015 0.031 0.029 0.032 - - - - 2016-0.031 0.029 0.032 - - - - assume 25% reduction relative to Euro 4 assume 25% reduction relative to Euro 4 Emission factors are subject to change on review

Release Plan NAEI are finalising the factors Peer review by DfT Tables of factors with supporting text will be available on NAEI website Implementation in EFT Will need to be keep under constant review as further evidence emerges

Conclusions (1) New exhaust emission factors for NO x and fleet composition have been compiled and are available on NAEI website and included in EFT Recent Euro standards for light duty diesel vehicles not delivering the expected improvements for NO x under real-world conditions Use of new emission factors and fleet data closes the gap between trends in emissions and roadside concentrations of NO x, but there is still a gap Euro 5, 6? Primary NO 2 Importance of technology: SCR vs EGR

Conclusions (2) The EEA COPERT 4 source of emission factors of PM and VOCs have been adopted by the NAEI for national modelling of road transport emissions, but do not indicate such significant differences with previous UK factors Verification analysis on HCs do not indicate major discrepancies PM exhaust? Knowledge of Euro standards is no longer sufficient Increasing variety of vehicle technologies entering the fleet Increasingly important to understand technology mix, but getting this information is difficult Emission factors for many alternative technologies are very uncertain and variable Different levels of performance in retrofits, hybrids Procurement specification key to performance A set of emission factors for most main technologies will be made available and incorporated into EFT

Acknowledgements The NAEI work is supported by Defra, the Scottish Executive, Welsh Assembly and Department of the Environment in Northern Ireland: Sarah Honour, Emily Connolly (Defra-ALE) Ricardo-AEA colleagues who made a major contribution to this work are Yvonne Pang and Helen Venfield Much of the analysis on NO x trends was carried out by David Carslaw and colleagues at King s College. Grateful for figures and many useful discussions Grateful for advice and much useful information from Yvonne Brown (Bureau Veritas), Claire Cheriyan, Finn Coyle and colleagues at TfL who have been most helpful Analysis on hydrocarbon trends by Dick Derwent (rdscientific)

Tim Murrells Principal Consultant Ricardo-AEA The Gemini Building Fermi Avenue Harwell Didcot OX11 0QR Tel: +44 (0)870 190 6539 E: tim.p.murrells@ricardo-aea.com W: http://www.ricardo-aea.com Copyright Ricardo-AEA Ltd This presentation is submitted by Ricardo-AEA. It may not be used for any other purposes, reproduced in whole or in part, nor passed to any organisation or person without the specific permission in writing of the Commercial Manager, Ricardo-AEA Ltd.