Nashville MusicCity Star

Similar documents
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

is being pushed by the locomotive, which reduces the number of seats in that car.

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Overview of Regional Commuter Rail Webinar: Phoenix, Arizona December 18, 2013

Regional Transportation District. Dave Genova Interim General Manager and CEO August 21, 2015

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Charlotte Area Transit System: Moving Forward John Lewis CATS Chief Executive Officer

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Green Line Long-Term Investments

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

UNION STATION MASTER PLAN STUDY

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Click to edit Master title style

SUPPORTING TOD IN METRO CHICAGO

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Maryland Gets to Work

Georgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at

DART Capital Program Update

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

DRAFT Subject to modifications

Successful Passenger Rail in the State of California

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

Planning of the HSR Network

Proposal for September 2006 Start of Commuter Rail from Lovejoy on the Macon Line to Atlanta

Assessing Streetcar Feasibility in Your Community. Rail~Volution. Thomas Brennan Nelson\Nygaard Nygaard Consulting September 9, 2005

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

Regional Commuter and Intercity Passenger Rail in Arizona

History of Subway in Kyoto

The South Waterfront District and the Portland Aerial Tram

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Independence Institute Denver West Parkway, Suite 185 Golden, Colorado i2i.org/cad.aspx BRT = BTR

Shuttle Bug: Linking Workers to Public Transportation in Northern Cook and Southern Lake Counties University of Illinois- Chicago Urban

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

FasTracks News. RTD s Eagle P3 Transit Project Nears Halfway Mark to Opening Day EP3 will add three commuter rail lines to metro area in 2016

Southern California - CHSRA

Equitable transit-oriented development: Tools + Tactics

The Latest on Joint Development Policy Guidance

Alternative Transportation Options:

DAVID DAVID BURNS BURNS RAILROAD RAILROAD INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERING CONSULTANT CONSULTAN CHICAGO CHICAGO, USA, USA

Background Information for MPRB Community Advisory Committee for 2010 Southwest Light Rail Transit Project DEIS Comment Letter Section 2

Chapter 7. Transportation Capital Improvement Projects. Chapter 7

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

The Future of Transportation on the Caltrain Corridor

Dismantling the Streetcar System:

Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

D2 - CBD Second Alignment

Energy Technical Memorandum

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

DART Priorities Overview

Proposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

I-35W Past, Present, and Future: METRO Orange Line

Positive Train Control (PTC)

Program. presented by: September 22, 2010

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Introduction

The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects

Leveraging Land Use Changes through Transportation Funding

Navigating in Different Rivers

Building Equitable Sustainable Transit OPEN HOUSE

METRO TRANSIT a n n ua l re p o r t. madison, wisconsin // mymetrobus.com

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

Husky Stadium: TMP Modernization Project

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

The range of alternatives has been reviewed with the RTAC Subgroup and the preliminary analysis is proceeding on the following HCT alternatives:

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Proposed FY2015 Budget and Fare Increase

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Rocky Mountain. Corridor Input Team. Alternatives Overview. TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC

Transcription:

Nashville MusicCity Star The MusicCity Star (MCS) commuter rail went into service September 2006. The Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) in Nashville was formed as the body to implement commuter rail in the region. The commuter rail service stretches 32 miles from Lebanon, TN, to downtown Nashville. The MCS shares a single track with the Nashville and Eastern Railway Authority (a public entity). There are six stations, including two terminus stations. Passing sidings were added to accommodate freight rail and to alleviate the problems of freight and passenger rail conflicts. Nashville Metro Population: 1.2 Technology: Commuter Rail Length: 32 miles Station Count: 6 Fare: $4-$5 one way Began service: 2006 Total Cost: $41 Cost per Mile: $1.28 Est. Annual Operating Cost: $3 Federal Funding: $24 (58%) Ridership: 1,500 each Costs: Description Project Management Railroad Rehabilitation Total Budgeted Cost (in s) $4.3 $23.1 Station Design $1.1 The MusicCity Star operates four inbound and four outbound trips per day. In addition, there is special service for events such as NFL football games. The cost per trip is $5 one way for the longest trip segment. The total trip time from the farthest station to downtown Nashville is 40 minutes. It took 10 years from the initial feasibility study to the final implementation. The environmental impact study for the corridor was completed in 2000, and a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was issued. Eighty percent of the funding for the commuter rail came from Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration funds. Eleven used coach cars were purchased from the Chicago METRA train system to reduce costs. Locally Proposed Financial Plan Source of Funds Total Funds Percent of Total in s Federal Section 5309 New Starts $24.0 58.4% FHWA High Priority Project Funds $7.4 18.0% Section 115 Funds (STP) $1.0 2.4% State TDOT General Fund $4.0 9.7% Local Nashville & Eastern Rail Authority $2.5 6.1% Nashville, Davidson County $1.6 3.9% City of Mt. Juliet $0.2 0.5% City of Lebanon $0.2 0.5% Wilson County $0.2 0.5% Total $41.1 100.0% Station Construction $11.3 Vehicles $0.675 $40.5

St. Louis MetroLink The St. Louis MetroLink consists of 38 miles of light rail throughout the St. Louis Metro Area. The original 16 mile line opened in 1993 and served the Lambert International Airport, Downtown St. Louis and East St. Louis. Portions of the system are grade-separated with two subway stations and three elevated stations. The remaining 23 stations are at-grade and have characteristics similar to a light rail system. St. Louis Metro Population: 2.7 Technology: Light Rail Length: 16 miles (1 st line), now 38 miles Station Count: 28 Fare: $2.00 one way Began service: 1993 Total Cost: $348 (for first 16 mile Starter Line) Cost per Mile: $21.7 Ridership: 55,000 each $4.3 billion in new development within 10 minute walk of transit Most of the system utilizes former railway alignments that since have been abandoned. A portion of the railway uses an abandoned baggage-handling tunnel beneath Union Station in downtown. Ridership has reached 50,000 riders daily, for an annual passenger mile count of 125. Conversely, the bus system generated only 122 passenger miles, and at a greater per-passenger cost. The one rail line accounts for more passenger miles than the entire 101 bus routes combined. Although federal funds were used to build the initial 16 miles of alignment, the latest extension, an 8.2 mile segment into the suburb of Shrewsbury, was funded entirely by local bond proceeds. Over the past 14 years since the original segment was built, there has been $4.3 billion in new development within ½ mile of the original alignment. The ridership characteristics of the MetroLink system are unique when compared to transit systems around the country. Many riders are choice riders that own cars but choose to ride transit. According to a recent study, 68% of MetroLink riders own two or more cars. Even more surprising, 80% of MetroLink riders are not former bus riders, but instead entirely new riders that did not use transit before the rail line was built.

Albuquerque Rail Runner The Rail Runner Express operates 47 miles of commuter rail each. The Rail Runner operates seven roundtrips each. Tracks are shared with BNSF (although they are owned by the New Mexico Department of Transportation and have freight traffic on them during the times when the commuter train is not using the tracks. By 2008, NMDOT expects to purchase 300 miles of track from BNSF for further expansion of the line. Albuquerque Metro Population: 816,800 Technology: Commuter Rail Length: 47 miles Station Count: 9 Fare: $1-$3 one way Began service: 2006 Total Cost: $135 Cost per mile: $2.8 Est. Annual Operating Cost: $9.5 Federal Funding: None Ridership: 2,000 each Initiated by Governor Bill Richardson in 2003 Completely funded at the state level $50 for purchase of 51 miles of BNSF railway $75 for 10 railcars and 5 locomotives The New Mexico Rail Runner was an idea that had been started decades before, but it was not until Governor Bill Richardson created Governor Richardson s Investment Partnership (GRIP) in 2003, that the project really took off. In just three years, by utilizing only state funding and an already existing rail corridor, the New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT) and Mid Region Council of Governments (MRCOG) partnered to develop the 47 mile commuter rail line. The GRIP program is part of a $1.6 billion project in New Mexico aimed at building infrastructure and providing new modes of transportation to New Mexicans. Service began in July of 2006 and was well-received by the public. For the first three months, the service was provided free of charge to encourage people to try out the service. Park-and-ride lots are located at each of the stations, with ample parking for customers who prefer to keep the flexibility of having their vehicles, but want the relaxed nature and dependability of commuter rail travel times. Fares are reasonable and easily make the trip worth the fare. Depending on the distance traveled, fares range from $1 to $3. Expansion of the current system is already being demanded by citizens wanting transportation to the state capitol in Santa Fe. Plans are in place to extend the service to Santa Fe within the next three years.

Little Rock River Rail Streetcar The original idea for a streetcar in Little Rock did not come from the Transit Agency, Central Arkansas Transit (CAT), but instead was borne from the mayors of Little Rock and North Little Rock. The Alltel Arena had just been built on the north side of the Arkansas River and the mayor felt that it needed to be accessible to the River District of Little Rock on the south side of the river. In addition, the Clinton Presidential Library site had been selected on the south side of the river with construction ready to begin. It has been noted by many users of the system that the view from the bridge crossing the Arkansas River is spectacular. Little Rock Metro Population: 652,800 Technology: Streetcar Length: 2.5 miles No. of Stops: 11 Fare: $0.50 per round trip Began service: 2004 Total Cost: $19.6 Cost per Mile: $7.84 Federal Funding: 15.5 (80%) Ridership: 750 each $200 in new development since opening $28 minorleague baseball stadium will be built on the line Serves the Alltel Arena in North Little Rock The system contains 2.5 miles of streetcar track built into existing streets. This greatly decreased the cost of the project, because additional right-of-way was not required. Little Rock considered a rubber-tire trolley system, but ultimately declined to build that type of system because of the lack of investment that would result. The rationale was that private investors would not invest in a system that could be changed so easily. It was not guaranteed that the trolley route would stay the same with a rubber-tire system. Since the opening of the River Rail in 2004, ridership has averaged 750 riders per day. The number of people riding the River Rail has steadily increased as more and more development happens around the River Market District. Since service began in 2004, more than $200 in new development has been built or is planned. In 2006, an extension to the line was built to serve the Clinton Presidential Library, which opened the same year. The development of this line has spurred economic development that otherwise would not have happened, and has added a lively atmosphere to central Little Rock both day and night. The route connects many destinations including Alltel Arena, the convention center, loft apartments, hotels, two city halls, historic Argenta neighborhood, two museums, and the main library branch.

Dallas Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) In 1984 the Dallas Area Rapid Transit Board selected Light Rail as the mode of rail transportation for the Dallas area. Twelve years later, in 1996, the first 20 miles of Light Rail Transit opened. Since that time, enthusiasm for light rail has swelled in the Dallas area. Since the construction of the 20-mile starter line in 1996, the system has doubled in size to 45 miles. Plans to double the system again to 93 miles by 2014 are in full swing. In a historically car-oriented city, DART has attracted new ridership that otherwise would have been driving and contributing to the area s air quality woes. Dallas Metro Population: 4 Technology: Light Rail Length: 45 miles Station Count 34 Fare: $1.25 one-way Began service: 1996 Total Cost: $860 (for first 20 miles) Cost per Mile: $43 Light Rail Operating Cost per Passenger Mile: $0.54 Ridership: 62,000 each $3.3 billion in direct private business investment near stations Vacant land values increased 5x faster when located near transit Serves American Airlines Arena Over time, once staunch transit opponents are realizing the economic development potential of Light Rail Transit. Communities like Plano, Carrollton, and Farmers Branch, which at first rejected DART in their communities, are now embracing the idea and changing their zoning codes to incorporate transit oriented development. The most successful example to date is Mockingbird Station, located a few miles north of downtown Dallas. This station has resulted in successful mixed-use development that is now attracting new residents and businesses from all over the metro area. Today there is 200,000 sq. feet of apartments and 45,000 sq. feet of retail space. Mockingbird Station is becoming a true livework-play community that attracts the coveted young professionals demographic. Since opening in 1996, $3.3 billion in development has been constructed or is planned within walking distance of transit stations. This development far exceeded the expectations when the idea of light rail first took hold 23 years ago.

Salt Lake City TRAX Light Rail When planners first envisioned the TRAX Light Rail project, they expected to have 25,000 riders daily by the year 2020. By this year, daily ridership was already 55,000, twice what was originally expected. The success of Salt Lake City s light rail system is not uncommon. Citizens have embraced Light Rail as a method of improving their downtown areas. Salt Lake City residents have continued to pass sales tax increases to show their support of increased options in transportation. In November 2006, citizens voted to spend $2.5 billion to build an additional 26 miles of light rail, 88 miles of commuter rail, and 40 new stations. All this for a metro area with fewer people than Oklahoma City. SLC Metro Population: 1.06 Technology: Light Rail Length: 19 miles Station Count: 23 Fare: $1.60 one-way Began service: 1999 Total Cost: $520 Cost per mile: $27 Ridership: 55,000 each Planned $2.5 billion expansion over the next 10 years Over the past eight years since the development of TRAX, an incredible amount of development has sprung up around stations. One development in suburban Murray City (pop. 50,000) is a $140 retail, office, and housing development oriented near the station. This project will include 420 new housing units and is already sold out. Salt Lake City officials cites the demographic shift and rising fuel prices as reasons the development has done so well. Singles make up 41% of the population in Salt Lake City. Those demanding urban type developments are singles and couples without children. Also, as the baby boomer generation retires, many look for places to live that require less maintenance and better accessibility without the automobile. Another development that surprised officials was Waverly Station, developed on 10 acres alongside Meadowbrook TRAX station. The $42 project has 47 condos, 131 town homes, and 14,000 sq. feet of retail and office space. Before TRAX was built, Salt Lake City lacked interesting places in its downtown areas. Now there is a resurgence of life in the downtown areas and near transit stations that surprise even the planners who envisioned it.

Denver TheRide The Denver Light Rail has been a good example of incremental development of a light rail system. The system began as 5.3 mile system has now blossomed into a 120 mile system that will be built over the next 12 years. Denver has not been known for it s transit in the past, but now that citizens have seen the benefits of public transportation, and fuel prices continue to climb, they are eager to vote more transit lines and more Transit Oriented Development (TOD). The 120 mile expansion is funded by a $4.7 billion program funded by an ambitious financing package that draws from a number of sources. Denver Metro Population: 2.4 Technology: Light Rail Length: 35 miles Station Count: 36 Fare: $1.50-$3.75 Service frequency: Every 8 minutes Began service: 1994 Total Cost: $880 (for latest 19-mile expansion opened in 2006) Cost per mile: $46 Federal Funding: $925 (19.6%) Ridership: 40,000 daily FINANCIAL PLAN (in s) Amount % Total of Cost Sales Tax Bonds $2,366 50.2% Certificates of Participation (COPs) $203 4.3% TIFIA Loan $143 3.0% Pay as you go Cash $985 20.9% Federal New Start $815 17.3% Federal Other $110 2.3% Local Contribution $95 2.0% Total $4,717 100% One of the foremost sources of funding, comprising half of the cost, is a region-wide sales tax. After seeing the success of the initial 5.3 mile system, Denver area voters were excited to continue the expansion and voted 58% in favor of the proposal. Transit Oriented Development has been a primary focus of the Regional Transit Authority (RTA) as they develop these rail lines. This protects the interest of suburban residents who do not want things to change, and allows for more urban environments for the newcomers to the city who want more interesting urban places to call home. The demand for interesting places to live is increasing as the population ages and as younger people wait longer to start families. TOD creates the environments for these types of people to thrive and focus development around transit stations.

Austin Capital MetroRail By the end of 2008, Austin, Texas will have an Urban Commuter Rail system. But success did not come easy in Austin. In 2000, voters rejected a $1.9 billion light rail project that would cut through established neighborhoods and require a sales tax increase. Despite this defeat, government and community leaders were not disheartened. In 2004, Capital Metro, the city s transit agency, proposed a scaled back system. The new proposal included 32 miles of commuter-type rail that would utilize already existing freight rail tracks. Capital Metro had already acquired the 32 mile corridor, giving them the advantage of precedence over freight rail users. Austin Metro Population: 1.5 Technology: Light Commuter Rail (DMU) Length: 32 miles Station Count: 9 Fare: $1 each way Began service: Late 2008 Total Cost: $90 Cost per Mile: $2.81 Projected Ridership: 2,000 each Swiss built railcars are first in U.S. to meet European crashworthiness standards The financing package was also revised to be funded totally by receipts Capital Metro already received combined with federal New Stars funding. The light rail project will entail purchasing six Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) rail cars which, unlike the previous light rail referendum, will not require the expensive overhead catenaries used by most light rail systems. Service will be provided by six DMU units making 24 one-way runs each. Most runs will be made during the morning and afternoon peak with a handful of midday runs. The DMU units have 117 seats and room for 83 additional standing passengers. Each railcar costs approximately $5.75. The remaining funds are used for the nine stations, upgrading at-grade crossings, and constructing a new 2,000 foot overpass to avoid freight interference with Union Pacific trains. Riders traveling from the farthest station will have a 55 minute ride to the terminus in downtown Austin. Bus routes will be reoriented to serve transit stations more effectively when the system goes into service in late 2008. Of the nine stations, the three outlying stations farthest from downtown Austin will have park-and-ride lots, while the remaining stations will have little or no parking. This pattern is similar to the pattern seen in Dallas and Houston.