UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Similar documents
Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/16 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

PlainSite. Legal Document. Texas Western District Court Case No. 1:15-cv RP Yeti Coolers, LLC v. RTIC Coolers, LLC. Document 64.

PlainSite. Legal Document. Texas Western District Court Case No. 1:15-cv RP Yeti Coolers, LLC v. RTIC Coolers, LLC. Document 1.

Case 1:99-mc Document 458 Filed 06/05/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

FILED 2017 Mar-23 PM 12:37 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 3:12-cv BHS Document 1 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/17/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv RPM Document 1 Filed 12/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 4:11-cv MAG -PJK Document 1 Filed 02/09/11 Page 1 of 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 293 Filed 06/27/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 5:17-cv NC Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:1. Deadline.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

H-D USA LLC et al v. Urban Outfitters Inc View Document View Docket

Design Protection in the United States

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 3:10-cv JGH Document 1 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Senator BOB SMITH District 17 (Middlesex and Somerset)

Maryland Lemon Law Statute. For Free Maryland Lemon Law Help Click Here

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SENATE BILL lr1706 A BILL ENTITLED. Vehicle Laws Manufacturers, Distributors, and Factory Branches Prohibited Acts

Aamco Transmissions v. James Dunlap

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

mew Doc 2578 Filed 02/16/18 Entered 02/16/18 12:17:29 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/26/16 Page 1 of 7

PATENT UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. ET AL.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:16-cv K Document 1 Filed 04/15/16 Page 1 of 21 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MAINE LEMON LAW SUMMARY

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/19 Page 1 of 14 : : : : : : : : : : :

Telhio Credit Union Account to Account (A2A) Transfer Service User Agreement

Filing # E-Filed 09/12/ :15:57 PM

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Docket No. NHTSA ]

GUIDELINES FOR PREVUE DISTRIBUTORS USE OF PREVUE TRADEMARKS AND COPYRIGHTS January 23, 2017

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM

July 16, 2014 Page 2 of 9 Model Year Jeep Liberty (KJ) , , , , , ,997 Model Year Jeep Gr

Public Access Electric Vehicle Charging Station Rebate Program Agreement

CHAPTER 14.3 TOWING AND STORAGE OF VEHICLES*

Case 3:12-cv G Document 1 Filed 06/22/12 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1

Case Doc 7 Filed 02/28/17 Page 1 of 11. IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Greenbelt Division)

SANTA CLARA CITY RENEWABLE NET METERING & INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT

Case 3:16-cv N Document 13 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 44 PageID 113 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. Chapter Non-Consensual Towing

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED APRIL 5, 2018

USAACE & Fort Rucker Preventative Law Program. Alabama Lemon Law

NEW HAMPSHIRE LEMON LAW SUMMARY

DEALER REGISTRATION PACKAGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No

Case 1:17-cv LEK-DJS Document 1 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 24

City of Washington, Kansas Electric Department. Net Metering Policy & Procedure For Customer-Owned Renewable Energy Resources

CHAPTER 12 TOW TRUCKS

City of, Kansas Electric Department. Net Metering Policy & Procedures for Customer-Owned Renewable Energy Resources

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

RECOGNIZING FRANCHISING OPPORTUNITIES

PLEASE NOTE Legislative Counsel Office not Table of Public Acts

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 14, 2018

Amsterdam Boats. High-quality luxury boats and hospitality. Conditions of use and disclaimer. Version: August 2018

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

Every Disclosure Document issued by a Franchisor Member pursuant to the Code shall comply with the following requirements: -

2:16-cv GER-APP Doc # 3 Filed 04/28/16 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 7

LEGAL MEMORANDUM OF THE TOWN OF WEST WARWICK IN SUPPORT OF RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC TOWING ASSOCIATION, INC S PETITON FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

CHAPTER 20.1 WASTEWATER HAULING. Section Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following definitions shall apply:

Georgia Territorial Act

Case 2:12-cv KJM-DAD Document 1 Filed 12/07/12 Page 1 of 17

CHAPTER 25. SUBSTANTIVE RULES APPLICABLE TO ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDERS.

Case 1:14-md JMF Document 279 Filed 09/02/14 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) )

Case: 2:16-cr ART-CJS Doc #: 3-1 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 1 of 6 - Page ID#: 9

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION

TITLE 15 MOTOR VEHICLES, TRAFFIC AND PARKING 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS

Case 5:15-cv MHH Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv PAG Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/28/17 1 of 21. PageID #: 1

SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSED GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RULES CHAPTER TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES AND TAXI SERVICES

TOWN OF WINDSOR AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO

Prospector Square Property Owners Association Parking Rules & Regulations SECTION 1- GENERAL

Forensic Sciences Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC SCIENCES ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER IGNITION INTERLOCK RULES

Case bem Doc 854 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 17:13:18 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 53

Diesel Exhaust Fluid Certification Program Overview FEBRUARY 2009 REVISION 01

Case 2:18-cv MSD-LRL Document 1 Filed 06/14/18 Page 1 of 29 PageID# 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

ARLINGTON COUNTY CODE. Chapter 14.3 IMMOBILIZATION, REMOVAL, TOWING AND STORAGE OF VEHICLES FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY*

Enforcement Against Counterfeit Motorcycles In Asian Countries

PUBLIC Law, Chapter 539 LD 1535, item 1, 124th Maine State Legislature An Act To Create a Smart Grid Policy in the State

The Ram Brand. Key Visual Elements and Usage Guidelines

Assembly Bill No CHAPTER 309. An act to amend Section of, and to add Section to, the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles.

HOUSE AMENDED PRIOR PRINTER'S NOS. 13, 30, 47, PRINTER'S NO , 56 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

Transcription:

Automobili Lamborghini, S.p.A. v. Sangiovese, LLC et al Doc. AKERMAN SENTERFITT 00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. JACOB D. BUNDICK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. AKERMAN SENTERFITT 00 South Fourth Street, Suite 0 Las Vegas, Nevada Telephone: (0) -000 Facsimile: (0) 0- Email: ariel.stern@akerman.com Email: jacob.bundick@akerman.com Attorneys for Plaintiff AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI, S.p.A., an Italian Company, Plaintiff, - against - SANGIOVESE, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, SANGIOVESE BANQUET, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, and DAL TORO EXOTIC CARS LAS VEGAS, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case No.: :-cv-0 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Plaintiff, AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI, S.p.A., ("Lamborghini"), complains and alleges against Defendants, SANGIOVESE, LLC, SANGIOVESE BANQUET, LLC, and DAL TORO EXOTIC CARS LAS VEGAS, LLC, (collectively "Defendants"), as follows: I. NATURE OF THE ACTION. Lamborghini seeks damages and injunctive relief pursuant to Sections,, (a) and (c) of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C.,, (a) and (c)), Section.0() of the Nevada Revised Statutes, and common law. {WP;} Dockets.Justia.com

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to Section of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. ), and U.S.C., (a) and, and has supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to U.S.C. (a).. Venue is properly founded in this judicial district pursuant to U.S.C. (b) and (c) because Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction within this judicial district and operate businesses within this district because a substantial part of the events giving rise to these claims occurred within this district. III. THE PARTIES AKERMAN SENTERFITT 00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0-. Lamborghini is a company organized and existing under the laws of Italy, having its principal place of business at Via Modena, 00, Sant' Agata, Bolognese, Italy. Lamborghini is or has been the manufacturer of the world famous Automobili Lamborghini sportscars including, but not limited to, Lamborghini Murcielago, Lamborghini Gallardo, Lamborghini Reventon, Lamborghini Diablo and Lamborghini Countach.. Lamborghini is the holder of the world famous Lamborghini Trademarks, defined herein, including, but not limited to, the phrase Automobili Lamborghini, the phrase Lamborghini, the Automobili Lamborghini Bull-In-Shield Logo and the Lamborghini Bull-In- Shield Logo.. Defendant Sangiovese, LLC ("Sangiovese"), upon information and belief, is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada, having a principal place of business at Dean Martin Drive, #0, Las Vegas, NV and operating businesses within this jurisdiction at The Palazzo Resort Hotel and Casino, Las Vegas Blvd. S., Las Vegas, NV, including the Dal Toro Exotic Car Showroom, Dal Toro Merchandise Gallery, and Dal Toro Il Ristorante Italiano, and of which Lorenzo Barracco ("Barracco") is Manager. Upon information and belief, Sangiovese also conducts business within this jurisdiction through the operation of the fully interactive website domain: www.daltoro.com.. Defendant Sangiovese Banquet, LLC ("Sangiovese Banquet"), upon information and belief, is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada, {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- having a principal place of business at Dean Martin Drive, #0, Las Vegas, NV and operating businesses within this jurisdiction at The Palazzo Resort Hotel and Casino, Las Vegas Blvd. S., Las Vegas, NV, including the Dal Toro Exotic Car Showroom, Dal Toro Merchandise Gallery and Dal Toro Il Ristorante Italiano, and of which Barracco is Manager. Upon information and belief, Sangiovese Banquet also conducts business within this jurisdiction through the operation of the fully interactive website domain: www.daltoro.com.. Defendant Dal Toro Exotic Cars Las Vegas, LLC ("Dal Toro Exotic Cars"), upon information and belief, is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada, having a principal place of business at Dean Martin Drive, #0, Las Vegas, NV and operating business within this jurisdiction at The Palazzo Resort Hotel and Casino, Las Vegas Blvd. S., Las Vegas, NV, including the Dal Toro Exotic Car Showroom, and of which Barracco is Manager. Upon information and belief, Dal Toro Exotic Cars also conducts business within this jurisdiction through the operation of the fully interactive website domain: www.daltoro.com.. Defendants, upon information and belief, in their everyday operation, including through the Exotic Car Showroom, Merchandise Gallery, Restaurant and/or www.daltoro.com website, are directly engaging in the unauthorized use of the world famous Lamborghini Trademarks; parasitically living, trading and profiting off of the Lamborghini Trademarks; causing consumer confusion amongst the public through infringing activities and deceptive trade practices; and/or selling infringing and/or counterfeit products within this District as alleged herein. IV. THE WORLD FAMOUS LAMBORGHINI BRAND, TRADEMARKS AND TRADE DRESS. Lamborghini is the owner of the world famous Lamborghini Trademarks referenced in Paragraph that have become synonymous with luxurious and exotic automobiles. Moreover, the owners of the Lamborghini brand have long been recognized as worldwide leaders in the design, advertising, marketing and distribution of premium, high-quality products. Consumers and the trade instantly identify Lamborghini as the source of all products bearing the Automobili Lamborghini or Lamborghini names and affiliated trademarks. The Lamborghini Trademarks are strong and {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- distinctive, have acquired great fame, enjoy worldwide recognition, are of great value and are thus entitled to a high degree of protection.. United States Federal Courts have adjudicated and upheld Lamborghini s Trademarks as famous, protected and distinctive. See Report and Recommendation dated June, 0 issued in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida by United States Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell [DE ], adopted by Opinion and Order dated July, 0 by United States District Judge John E. Steele [DE ], in Automobili Lamborghini SpA and Automobili Lamborghini Holding, SpA v. The Lamboshop, Inc. and Michael Heick, 0 WL (M.D.Fla.)., Case No: :0-cv--FtM-SPC; See also Final Judgment dated August, 0 entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by United States District Judge P. Kevin Castel [DE -], in Automobili Lamborghini SpA, Automobili Lamborghini Holding, SpA, and Lamborghini ArtiMarca SpA v. Alliance Capital, LLC a/k/a "Lamborghini Luxury", "Global Index, Inc.", and "Lamborghini Merchandise USA, Inc." and Ronald Goldberg, Case No: :0-cv-0- PKC. A. Lamborghini s Famous AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD Design Mark. Lamborghini is the owner of the world famous AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark consisting of the words Automobili Lamborghini and a distinctive bull within a shield. The AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark is the subject of the following registrations, among others, with the United States Patent and Trademark Office: Mark Reg. No. Serial No. Reg. Date 0 //0 {WP;}

0 //0 // AKERMAN SENTERFITT 00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0-. Copies of the trademark registration for the AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL- IN-SHIELD design mark are attached hereto as Exhibits A, B, and C.. The registration for the AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark is in full force and effect and have become incontestable pursuant to U.S.C... Lamborghini has used the AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark for many years on and in connection with the sale of high quality products, including on automobiles, vehicle parts, merchandise and apparel, and has carefully monitored and policed the use of the AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark. Further, Lamborghini has expended substantial time, money and other resources in developing, advertising and otherwise promoting its AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark. As a result of these efforts, consumers readily identify such items bearing the AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark as being high quality products sponsored and approved by Lamborghini.. Lamborghini s AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark qualifies as a famous mark, as that term is used in U.S.C. (c)(). {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- B. Lamborghini s Famous LAMBORGHINI Type Mark. Lamborghini is also the owner of the world famous LAMBORGHINI type mark. The LAMBORGHINI type mark is the subject of the following registrations, among others, with the United States Patent and Trademark Office: Mark Reg. No. Serial No. Reg. Date LAMBORGHINI 0 //0 LAMBORGHINI 00 0 //0. Copies of the trademark registration for the LAMBORGHINI type mark are attached hereto as Exhibits D and E.. The registration for the LAMBORGHINI type mark is in full force and effect and have become incontestable pursuant to U.S.C.. C. Lamborghini s Famous LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD Design Mark. Lamborghini is also the owner of the world famous LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN- SHIELD design mark consisting of the word Lamborghini and a distinctive bull within a shield. The LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark is the subject of the following registrations, among others, with the United States Patent and Trademark Office: Mark Reg. No. Serial No. Reg. Date 0 //0. A copy of the trademark registration for the LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark is attached hereto as Exhibit F.. Lamborghini has used the LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark for many years on and in connection with the sale of high quality products, including on automobiles, vehicle parts, merchandise and apparel, and has carefully monitored and policed the use of the LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark. Further, Lamborghini has expended substantial time, money and other resources in developing, advertising and otherwise promoting its LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark. As a result of these efforts, consumers readily identify such items bearing the LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark as being high {WP;}

quality products sponsored and approved by Lamborghini.. Lamborghini s LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark qualifies as a famous mark, as that term is used in U.S.C. (c)(). D. Lamborghini s Extensive Efforts to Advertise and Promote the Lamborghini Trademarks. Lamborghini has extensively advertised and promoted the products manufactured under the Lamborghini Trademarks. For decades, the Lamborghini Trademarks have received AKERMAN SENTERFITT 00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- widespread exposure in the marketplace. Over the years, millions of consumers have been exposed to the Lamborghini Trademarks through extensive marketing events and campaigns, in mainstream and automotive magazines and other periodicals, as depicted on television and in motion pictures, on the Internet, and in other forms of unsolicited media coverage.. Over many years, Lamborghini has realized enormous and ever-increasing success in its sales of products bearing the Lamborghini Trademarks, such sales totaling in the millions of dollars in the United States alone.. Lamborghini constantly strives to maintain the prestige and reputation of quality and luxury associated with the Lamborghini brand. Strict quality control standards are imposed in the manufacture of all Lamborghini branded products. Lamborghini s painstaking adherence to only the highest quality standards has resulted in widespread and favorable public acceptance among consumers for all products bearing the Lamborghini Trademarks.. As a result of Lamborghini s extensive advertising and promotion, adherence to the highest quality standards, and extraordinary sales success, the Lamborghini Trademarks, as well as other well known designs, logos and indicia introduced by Lamborghini, are among the most widelyrecognized automotive trademarks and source indicia in the United States, possessing strong secondary meaning among consumers and the trade, immediately identifying Lamborghini as the exclusive source of the products to which they are affixed, and signifying goodwill of incalculable value. V. DEFENDANTS ACTS OF INFRINGEMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION. In connection with their businesses, the Defendants are presently using Lamborghini's Trademarks, name and logo without authorization, permission or license. Brashly, Defendants {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- prominently display a large and striking LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD protected design mark at the entrance of Defendants' premises and a LAMBORGHINI protected type mark within Defendants' Exotic Car Showroom. A recent photograph of the unauthorized and infringing use by Defendants of Lamborghini's Trademark is attached hereto as Exhibit G. A copy of a printout from www.daltoro.com depicting the unauthorized and infringing display of the Lamborghini scripted type mark is attached hereto as Exhibit H.. Additionally, Defendants have engaged in designing, manufacturing, advertising, promoting, selling and/or offering for sale apparel and accessory products for consumers bearing logos and source-identifying indicia that are studied imitations of the Lamborghini Trademarks, including a bull-in-shield design (collectively the Infringing Products ). The Dal Toro Mark shown in Exhibit G, and deliberately placed next to Lamborghini's Trademark at Defendants' premises, is confusingly similar in shape, color and design to Lamborghini's. 0. The Infringing Products which display the infringing Dal Toro Mark are advertised, promoted and sold through the Defendants' Exotic Car Showroom, Merchandise Gallery and/or Restaurant. Defendants have strategically and deliberately placed such Infringing Products directly next to authentic Lamborghini merchandise and Lamborghini Trademarks so as to foreseeably cause confusion to the viewing public and consumers that Defendants' Infringing Products are somehow sponsored by, affiliated with, or authorized by Lamborghini. Similarly, infringing Dal Toro signage is placed along side Lamborghini's Trademarks at Defendants' premises and used in conjunction with the sale of the Infringing Products and other authentic Lamborghini merchandise. This plain intent of Defendants in such product placement is to bootstrap and tie the Infringing Products to the Lamborghini name, image, likeness and brand.. On or about May and, 0, Lamborghini met with Defendants Sangiovese and Sangiovese Banquet and their Manager Barracco to address the infringing Dal Toro Mark. Barracco, on behalf of said Defendants, agreed that the Dal Toro logo would be removed from all signage in and around Defendants' premises, including the Restaurant, that the Dal Toro Mark would be deregistered and canceled of record with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and that the Infringing Products containing the Dal Toro Mark would be discontinued. {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0-. On or about May, 0, one day after the above meetings concluded, a proposed Service Mark and Trademark Agreement confirming these accords was prepared and delivered to Defendants Sangiovese and Sangiovese Banquet for execution. Lamborghini also followed up on numerous occasions. However, Defendants' infringing actions persisted.. Thereafter, on September, 0, Lamborghini issued to Defendants Sangiovese and Sangiovese Banquet a Notice of Trademark Infringement and Demand to Cease and Desist from further use of the Dal Toro Mark, withdrawal of its registration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and removal of all infringing signage and merchandise. Exhibit I. Again, said Defendants failed to respond or take the agreed corrective actions and continued their infringing activities.. Upon information and belief, Defendants continued and intend to continue to design, manufacture, advertise, promote, display, sell and/or offer for sale the Infringing Products, unless otherwise restrained. Their infringing materials remain in defiance of Lamborghini's demands to cease and desist.. On or about May, 0, the Dal Toro Mark was determined abandoned by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for Sangiovese Banquet's failure to file a Statement of Use. However, the Dal Toro Mark continues to be proximately displayed and its use expanded through business cards, merchandise and signage, and through www.daltoro.com.. Defendants are well aware of the extraordinary fame and strength of the previously established Lamborghini Trademarks and the incalculable goodwill symbolized thereby, and that the Infringing Products and infringing signage misstate to the public and the trade, the source or sponsorship for the products and signs they are manufacturing, advertising, displaying and/or distributing. Accordingly, Defendants have been engaging in the above-described unlawful activities knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for Lamborghini s rights in the Lamborghini Trademarks.. Together with, and in addition to the Infringing Products and infringing signage, Defendants are using various other design elements and designations, including, but not limited to certain fonts, typefaces, designs and graphic designs that are knockoffs of design elements and designations used by or associated with Lamborghini (the Knockoff Products ), all with the {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- deliberate intention to cause consumers and the trade to believe that their products are manufactured or produced by Lamborghini, sponsored by Lamborghini, affiliated with Lamborghini or that they are authentic Lamborghini merchandise.. Defendants' advertisement, promotion and sale of the Knockoff Products is part of a sophisticated and elaborate scheme to target Lamborghini, to create products that are similar in appearance to well-known Lamborghini products, and to trade upon the goodwill and reputation associated with Lamborghini and its high quality, distinctive product lines, including by deliberately misleading the public and the trade as to the authenticity, source, affiliation or sponsorship of Defendants operations and products.. Rather than going through the effort and expense of developing and creating their own unique designs, Defendants have chosen to target and live parasitically off Lamborghini by knowingly and slavishly replicating Lamborghini s world-famous design elements and designations, to advantage the markets and demand Lamborghini has created for such designs without having to incur the developmental, promotional and advertising expenses that Lamborghini has incurred. 0. Upon information and belief, Defendants pervasive use, display and sale of the Knockoff Products are blatant attempts to misappropriate the skills, expenditures, know how and labors of Lamborghini, and profit from the commercial advantage Lamborghini has established, and the international recognition Lamborghini has achieved for its famous design elements and designations.. Upon further information and belief, Defendants intend to continue to sell such Knockoff Products, and will continue to misappropriate additional design elements and designations associated with Lamborghini, unless otherwise restrained.. As a result of the Defendants' infringing activities and unfair competition, Lamborghini has been damaged. {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT ( U.S.C. ()(a)). The allegations set forth in paragraphs through hereof are adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.. Defendants have used in commerce, a reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of Lamborghini's Trademarks in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution or advertising of its Infringing Products.. Defendants Infringing Products and infringing signage are intended to cause, have caused and are likely to continue to cause, confusion, mistake and deception among the general consuming public and the trade as to whether they originate, are affiliated with, or sponsored or endorsed by Lamborghini.. Lamborghini's Trademarks have priority over the Dal Toro Mark used on the Infringing Products and infringing signage.. Upon information and belief, Defendants have acted with knowledge of Lamborghini s ownership of the Lamborghini Trademarks and with the deliberate intention to unfairly benefit from the incalculable goodwill symbolized thereby.. Defendants acts constitute trademark infringement in violation of Section of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. ).. Upon information and belief, by their acts, Defendants have made and will make substantial profits and gains to which they are not in law or equity entitled. 0. Upon information and belief, Defendants intend to continue their infringing acts, and continue to willfully infringe the Lamborghini Trademarks, unless restrained by this Court.. Defendants acts have damaged and will continue to damage Lamborghini, and Lamborghini has no adequate remedy at law. {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN ( U.S.C. (a)). The allegations set forth in paragraphs through hereof are adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.. Defendants promotion, distribution, sale and offering for sale of the Infringing Products, together with Defendants use of other designations and indicia associated with Lamborghini, is intended, and is likely to confuse, mislead, or deceive consumers, the public, and the trade as to the origin, source, sponsorship, or affiliation of the Infringing Products, and is intended, and is likely to cause such parties to believe in error that the Infringing Products have been authorized, sponsored, approved, endorsed or licensed by Lamborghini, or that Defendants are in some way affiliated with Lamborghini.. Defendants acts constitute a false designation of origin, and false and misleading descriptions and representations of fact, all in violation of Section (a) of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. (a)).. Upon information and belief, by their acts, Defendants have made and will make substantial profits and gains to which they are not in law or equity entitled.. Upon information and belief, Defendants intend to continue their willfully infringing acts unless restrained by this Court.. Defendants acts have damaged and will continue to damage Lamborghini, and Lamborghini has no adequate remedy at law. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF TRADEMARK DILUTION ( U.S.C. (c)). The allegations set forth in paragraphs through hereof are adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.. Lamborghini is the exclusive owner of the Lamborghini Trademarks in the United States. 0. The Lamborghini Trademarks are famous, strong and distinctive marks that have been in use for many years and have achieved enormous and widespread public recognition. {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0-. The Lamborghini Trademarks are famous within the meaning of Section (c) of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. (c)).. Defendants commercial use of the Infringing Products and infringing signage in commerce after Lamborghini's Trademarks became famous, without authorization from Lamborghini, is diluting the distinctive quality of the Lamborghini Trademarks and decreasing the capacity of such marks to identify and distinguish Lamborghini s goods.. Defendants have intentionally and willfully diluted the distinctive quality of the famous Lamborghini Trademarks in violation of Section (c) of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. (c)).. Upon information and belief, by their acts, Defendants have made and will make substantial profits and gains to which they are not in law or equity entitled.. Upon information and belief, Defendants intend to continue their willfully infringing acts unless restrained by this Court.. Defendants acts have damaged and will continue to damage Lamborghini, and Lamborghini has no adequate remedy at law. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF UNFAIR COMPETITION ( U.S.C. (a)). The allegations set forth in paragraphs through hereof are adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.. Defendants have used in commerce a reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of Lamborghini's Trademarks in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution or advertising of its Infringing Products.. Defendants Infringing Products and infringing signage are intended to cause, have caused and are likely to continue to cause confusion, mistake and deception among the general consuming public and the trade as to whether they originate, are affiliated, sponsored, or endorsed by Lamborghini. Specifically, Defendants have used and prominently display Lamborghini's priority Trademarks, without authorization, permission or license, in conjunction with and adjacent to the Dal Toro Mark at their premises. {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0-0. Upon information and belief, Defendants have acted with knowledge of Lamborghini s ownership of the Lamborghini Trademarks and with the deliberate intention to unfairly benefit from the incalculable goodwill symbolized thereby.. Defendants acts constitute unfair competition in violation of Section (a) of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. (a)).. Upon information and belief, by their acts, Defendants have made and will make substantial profits and gains to which they are not in law or equity entitled.. Upon information and belief, Defendants intend to continue their infringing acts, and will continue to willfully infringe the Lamborghini Trademarks, unless restrained by this Court.. Defendants acts have damaged and will continue to damage Lamborghini, and Lamborghini has no adequate remedy at law. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF COMMON LAW TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT. The allegations set forth in paragraphs through, and through, hereof are adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.. Lamborghini owns all right, title, and interest in and to the Lamborghini Trademarks as aforesaid, including all common law rights in such marks.. The aforesaid acts of Defendants constitute trademark infringement in violation of common law.. Upon information and belief, by their acts, Defendants have made and will make substantial profits and gains to which they are not in law or equity entitled.. Upon information and belief, Defendants intend to continue their willfully infringing acts unless restrained by this Court. 0. Defendants acts have damaged and will continue to damage Lamborghini, and Lamborghini has no adequate remedy at law. {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION. The allegations set forth in paragraphs through, and through, hereof are adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.. The aforesaid acts of the Dal Toro Defendants constitute unfair competition in violation of common law.. Upon information and belief, by their acts, Defendants have made and will make substantial profits and gains to which they are not in law or equity entitled.. Upon information and belief, Defendants intend to continue their willfully infringing acts unless restrained by this Court.. Defendants acts have damaged and will continue to damage Lamborghini, and Lamborghini has no adequate remedy at law. SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING ( U.S.C. ()(a), ). The allegations set forth in paragraphs through hereof are adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.. Defendants, without authorization from Lamborghini, have used and are continuing to use, advertise, promote and sell, including through the Knockoff Products, spurious designations that are identical to, or substantially indistinguishable from, Lamborghini s AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI type mark and LAMBORGHINI type mark.. Defendants, without authorization from Lamborghini, have used and are continuing to use, advertise, promote and sell, including through the Knockoff Products, spurious designations that are identical to, or substantially indistinguishable from, Lamborghini s AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark and LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark.. The foregoing acts of Defendants are likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deceive consumers into believing that Defendants products are genuine or authorized products of Lamborghini. {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0-0. Defendants acts constitute trademark counterfeiting in violation of Section of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. ), and Section of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. ).. Upon information and belief, by their acts, Defendants have made and will make substantial profits and gains to which they are not in law of equity entitled.. Upon information and belief, Defendants intend to continue their infringing acts, and will continue to willfully infringe Lamborghini s AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI type mark and LAMBORGHINI type mark.. Upon information and belief, Defendants intend to continue their infringing acts, and will continue to willfully infringe Lamborghini s AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN- SHIELD design mark and LAMBORGHINI BULL-IN-SHIELD design mark.. Defendants acts have damaged and will continue to damage Lamborghini, and Lamborghini has no adequate remedy at law. EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF VIOLATION OF N.R.S..0() DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICE. The allegations set forth in paragraphs through hereof are adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.. The aforesaid acts of Defendants constitute a deceptive trade practice in violation of the Section.0() of the Nevada Revised Statutes.. By virtue of their acts, including the unauthorized prominent display of Lamborghini's Trademarks in connection with their businesses and the infringing Dal Toro Mark, Defendants have knowingly made a false representation as to affiliation, connection, association with or certification by Lamborghini.. Upon information and belief, by their acts, Defendants have made and will make substantial profits and gains to which they are not in law or equity entitled.. Upon information and belief, Defendants intend to continue their willfully infringing acts unless restrained by this Court. 0. Defendants acts have damaged and will continue to damage Lamborghini, and Lamborghini has no adequate remedy at law. {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Lamborghini demands judgment against Defendants as follows:. Finding that (i) Defendants have violated Section of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. ); Section of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. Section ); Section (a) of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. (a)); and Section (c) of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. (c)); (ii) Defendants have engaged in trademark infringement and unfair competition under common law; and (iii) Defendants have violated Section.0() of the Nevada Revised Statutes.. Granting an injunction permanently restraining and enjoining Defendants, their officers, agents, employees and attorneys, and all those persons or entities in active concert or participation with them, or any of them, from: a) manufacturing, importing, advertising, marketing, promoting, supplying, distributing, offering for sale or selling any products which bear the Lamborghini Trademarks or any other mark substantially or confusingly similar thereto, including, without limitation, the Infringing Products, infringing signage, Knockoff Products, and engaging in any other activity constituting an infringement of any of Lamborghini s rights in the Lamborghini Trademarks, or any other trademark owned by Lamborghini; and b) engaging in any other activity constituting unfair competition with Lamborghini, or acts and practices that deceive the public and/or the trade, including, without limitation, the use of design elements and designations associated with Lamborghini; and c) engaging in any activity that will cause the distinctiveness of the Lamborghini Trademarks or any other mark substantially or confusingly similar thereto, to be diluted.. Directing such other relief as the Court may deem appropriate to prevent the public from deriving any erroneous impression that any product at issue in this case that has been manufactured, imported, advertised, marketed, promoted, supplied, distributed, offered for sale or sold by Defendants, has been authorized by Lamborghini, or is related to or associated in any way with Lamborghini or its products.. Directing that Defendants account to and pay over to Lamborghini all profits realized by their wrongful acts directing that such profits be trebled in accordance with Section of the {WP;}

00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- Lanham Act ( U.S.C. ).. At its election, awarding Lamborghini statutory damages including, in accordance with Section of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. ).. Awarding Lamborghini its actual damages including, in accordance with Section of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. ).. Awarding Lamborghini its costs and attorneys fees and investigatory fees and expenses, including to the full extent provided for by Section of the Lanham Act ( U.S.C. ).. Requiring Defendants to deliver up to Lamborghini for destruction or other disposition all remaining inventory of all Infringing Products and Knockoff Products, including all advertising, promotional and marketing materials therefore, as well as all means of making same.. Awarding Lamborghini pre-judgment interest on any monetary award made part of the judgment against Defendants. {WP;}

. Awarding Lamborghini such additional and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated this th day of July,. AKERMAN SENTERFITT 00 SOUTH FOURTH STREET, SUITE 0 TEL.: (0) -000 FAX: (0) 0- Of Counsel: AKERMAN SENTERFITT JOHN C. DOTTERRER, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 0 john.dotterrer@akerman.com STEPHEN J. GIOVINCO, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 0 stephen.giovinco@akerman.com Lakeview Avenue, Suite 00 West Palm Beach, Florida 0 Telephone: () -000 Facsimile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiff AKERMAN SENTERFITT /s/ Jacob Bundick ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. Email: ariel.stern@akerman.com JACOB D. BUNDICK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. Email: jacob.bundick@akerman.com 00 South Fourth Street, Suite 0 Las Vegas, Nevada Telephone: (0) -000 Facsimile: (0) 0- {WP;}