I. T-38A ADV GENERAL FEATURES

Similar documents
A310 MEMORY ITEMS Last Updated: 20th th October 2011

Owners Manual. Table of Contents 3.1. INTRODUCTION AIRSPEEDS FOR EMERGENCY OPERATION OPERATIONAL CHECKLISTS 3

INDEX. Preflight Inspection Pages 2-4. Start Up.. Page 5. Take Off. Page 6. Approach to Landing. Pages 7-8. Emergency Procedures..

Cessna Aircraft Short & Soft Field Takeoff & Landing Techniques

XIV.C. Flight Principles Engine Inoperative

Fokker 50 - Landing Gear & Flaps

FLIGHT CONTROLS SYSTEM

Lecture 5 : Static Lateral Stability and Control. or how not to move like a crab. G. Leng, Flight Dynamics, Stability & Control

FLASHCARDS AIRCRAFT. Courtesy of the Air Safety Institute, a Division of the AOPA Foundation, and made possible by AOPA Services Corporation.

Vso 61. Vs1 63. Vr 70. Vx 76. Vxse 78. Vy 89. Vyse. 89 (blue line) Vmc. 61 (radial redline) Vsse 76. Va 134) Vno 163

Landing Gear & Brakes

System Normal Secondary Direct. All 3 PFC work in parallel. available. Pitch Normal Secondary Direct. Pitch maneuver command.

North American F-86F Sabre USER MANUAL. Virtavia F-86F Sabre DTG Steam Edition Manual Version 1

Reducing Landing Distance

DASSAULT AVIATION Proprietary Data

JODEL D.112 INFORMATION MANUAL C-FVOF

Jump to Table of Contents

V - Speeds. RV-10 V fe Flaps Speeds Trail (0 deg) Half (15 deg) Full (30 deg) 122 kias 96 kias. 80 kias

CESSNA CITATION C750 (CITATION X) PUNTA BRAVA S.A. (Rev Abril 2012)

DASSAULT AVIATION Proprietary Data

CESSNA 182 TRAINING MANUAL. Trim Control Connections

COLUMBIA 350 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES

Engine Performance Analysis

F-5E Tiger II USER MANUAL. Virtavia F-5E Tiger II DTG Steam Edition Manual Version 2.0

AIRSPEEDS. Cessna 172R Emergency Checklist

MilViz F-4E/J/S ADV Manual. Military Visualizations Inc

Y. Lemmens, T. Benoit, J. de Boer, T. Olbrechts LMS, A Siemens Business. Real-time Mechanism and System Simulation To Support Flight Simulators

Normal T/O Procedure. * * * Engine Failure on T/O * * *

XIV.D. Maneuvering with One Engine Inoperative

Facts, Fun and Fallacies about Fin-less Model Rocket Design

Embraer Systems Summary [Landing Gear & Brakes]

Prop effects (Why we need right thrust) Torque reaction Spiraling Slipstream Asymmetric Loading of the Propeller (P-Factor) Gyroscopic Precession

BMAA FLIGHT TEST PLAN BMAA/AW/010a issue 2 Reg: Type: TADS or MAAN applying:

CARENADO COPYRIGHTS. Normal & Emergency Checklist

DO NOT WRITE ON THIS TEST FEB 2013 Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test. Cessna - 182

Airframes Instructor Training Manual. Chapter 6 UNDERCARRIAGE

FIRST FLYING TECHNIQUES COCKPIT PREPARATION STARTUP TAXI

CESSNA 182 CHECKLIST. LEFT WING Trailing Edge 1. Aileron CHECK freedom of movement and security

If, nonetheless, an emergency does arise, the guidelines given here should be followed and applied in order to clear the problem.

Mig-29A FulcrumA & Mig-29S FulcrumC Short range air to air fighter with limited air to ground capability.

Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test

F/A-18A/B/C/D Flight Control Computer Software Upgrade

Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test

Fokker 50 - Limitations GENERAL LIMITATIONS MASS LIMITATIONS. Page 1. Minimum crew. Maximum number of passenger seats.

EMERGENCY PROCEDURES SECTION I. HELICOPTER SYSTEMS

TECNAM P92 EAGLET N615TA TECNAM P92 EAGLET CHECKLIST [FLIGHT PLAN DESIGNATION IS ECHO ]

DESIGN FOR SPIN. Leonardo Manfriani Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Keywords: aerodynamic design, rotary balance testing, flight mechanics, spinning

Climber is 776B101101

TECNAM P2004 BRAVO N128LS

Su-33 Flanker Volume Multi-Role carrierborne fighter-bomber.

Examen Teórico sobre Habilitación de Tipo B (Última actualización: Septiembre 2016)

canadair chsfflencjibr

Initial / Recurrent Ground Take-Home Self-Test: The Beechcraft 58 Baron Systems, Components and Procedures

Clean Sky 2. LifeCraft Demonstrationt (IADP RC 2 & ITDs) Consultation meetings Brussels th December 2012 OUTLINE

CIRRUS AIRPLANE MAINTENANCE MANUAL

NORMAL PROCEDURRES CHECKLIST PA T SENECA II PREFLIGHT CHECK INSIDE CABIN OUTSIDE CABIN

Owners Manual. Table of Contents 4.1. INTRODUCTION SPEEDS FOR NORMAL OPERATION CHECKLIST & PROCEDURES 4

SECTION 3 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES CONTENTS

30A BLDC ESC. Figure 1: 30A BLDC ESC

Cessna 172P PPL Checklist Page 1

PA32-RT LANCE II CHECKLIST

Preflight Inspection Cabin EMPENNAGE RIGHT WING Trailing Edge RIGHT WING NOSE

Lateral Directional Flight Considerations

Flightlab Ground School 13. A Selective Summary of Certification Requirements FAR Parts 23 & 25

Die Lösungen müssen manuell überpüft werden. Die Buchstaben stimmen nicht mehr überein.

AIRPLANE OPERATIONS MANUAL SECTION 2-15

RFC Dallas, Inc. AIRCRAFT QUESTIONNAIRE (9/25/2016) "A Safe Pilot Knows His Equipment"

Performance means how fast will it go? How fast will it climb? How quickly it will take-off and land? How far it will go?

FLIGHT TEST PROGRAM YOUR AIRPLANE HERE FLIGHT TEST PROGRAM YOUR AIRPLANE HERE

9303 PROGRAM MIX EXAMPLES

EXAMEN POR MATERIAS PARA USO DE LOS POSTULANTES A LA HABILITACIÓN DE TIPO EN MATERIAL B733. ENERO 2018

LAD Inc. Beechcraft King Air 200 Series Technical Ground School Syllabus Material Covered

CESSNA P 337 H Pressurized Skymaster

Compiled by Matt Zagoren

ENGINE GROUND RUNNING

Unscheduled Maintenance Checks

Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test

L 298/70 Official Journal of the European Union

FSFlyingSchool2010 Cessna 172 Detail Pack

CHAPTER 14 LANDING GEAR

Operational Liaison Meeting FBW aircraft. Avoiding Tail Strike

Flight Test Evaluation of C-130H Aircraft Performance with NP2000 Propellers

Interior Pre Flight Documents: Check Control Wheel Lock: Remove Flight Controls: Check Instruments: Check for Damage Switches: Verify All Off Master

Cessna 172RG WARNING. Maximum Demonstrated Crosswind. Takeoff or landing..15 KTS

Dealing with customer concerns related to electronic throttle bodies By: Bernie Thompson

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 7, July ISSN BY B.MADHAN KUMAR

PA-28R 201 Piper Arrow

Flight Manual DG-300. No. page description issue date. 2 4, 17, 21, 33 Installation of an additional tow hook TN Oct. 85

Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test

LATERAL WEIGHT ASYMMETRY LIMITS. Catapult takeoff

Gyroplane questions from Rotorcraft Commercial Bank (From Rotorcraft questions that obviously are either gyroplane or not helicopter)

A-6E Intruder USER MANUAL. Virtavia A-6E Intruder DTG Steam Edition Manual Version 2.0

PA28R ARROW CHECKLIST

Aircraft Maintenance Prof. A.K Ghosh Prof. Vipul Mathur Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

GACE Flying Club Aircraft Review Test 2018 N5312S & N5928E. Name: GACE #: Score: Checked by: CFI #:

ACTIVE STICK & THROTTLE FOR F-35. Joseph Krumenacker NAVAIR Flight Controls / JSF Vehicle Systems 16 October 2008

IN-FLIGHT CHECK LIST B-17 Technical Session for Flight Engineers 11/18/2017 (with REVISION)

Surface and Brakes Anti-Ice Systems

N123AX Piper Saratoga II HP (PA-32R-301) Checklist (v23 - Revision 3 April 2011) AIRSPEEDS FOR SAFE OPERATIONS. Best Rate of Climb (gear up, flaps up)

EMERGENCY CHECKLIST for N11HC

Transcription:

I. T-38A ADV GENERAL FEATURES Physics Model: Custom Flight Dynamics Engine (FDE) The T-38A ADV uses a 100% custom physics engine. Aside of a new level of accuracy in terms of flight dynamics modeling, it lacks the traditional and well-known MSFS / P3D FDE limitations. Custom ground dynamics and structural model This allows structural characteristics and limitations being realistically modeled for the T-38 airframe, engines, landing gear struts and tires. Accurate T-38 aerodynamic model based on Northrop and NASA data The ADV model is built only around wind tunnel and Flight Test data obtained from the aircraft manufacturer, NASA and other research agencies. The resulting model has been corrected and validated by real T-38 pilots. Realistic GE- J85-5A engine model The engine dynamics and performance characteristics are accurately modeled. This also involves real engine operating limitations (compressor stall, afterburner flameout, etc ) and realistic engine start procedures, including in-flight windmilling restarts. Accurate aircraft performance numbers vs real thing As result of the highly accurate model, the T38 ADV matches the real jet figures in terms of flight envelope, fuel consumption (range/endurance), energy manoeuvre diagrams, etc Flight Control System: The T-38 ADV flight control system model features: Stability Augmentation System (SAS) o Yaw SAS o Pitch SAS (T-38A Block20) Control stick bob-weight While a 100% realistic recreation of the aircraft control stick effects due to its bobweight system would need from a ForceFeedback joystick device, some algorithms have been included in this version in order to partially model it. This results in an overall more realistic flight experience.

Flap-Slab system T-38 aircraft flap-horizontal tail interconnect system is implemented in this version. Flight Control System limitations depending on Flaps configuration The maximum control surfaces deflection for ailerons and rudder are accurately limited depending on aircraft flaps position. Realistic control surfaces response curves to pilot inputs The control surfaces (ailerons, horizontal tails and rudder) are realistically deflected according to stick and pedal displacements since the actual flight controls gearing is implemented. Hydraulic/electric actuators model The dynamics of the hydraulic (ailerons, h. tails, and rudder) and electric (flaps) actuators is implemented. Other systems: Nose Wheel Steering Accurate model recreation based on actual T38 s NWS characteristics and limitations. Hydraulic Systems Flight Controls and Utility Hydraulic Systems realistically implemented including separated sub-system feed lines. Failures/damage model: Custom failures model affecting: Airframe Engines Landing gear Hydraulic Systems (FLT CTRLS + UTILITY) Flight Controls (control surfaces, flap-slab, etc ) SAS Forced and random failures system Possibility to create time dependant events or randomly created failures on different systems with scalability in damage. In case of random failures selection, the probabilities can be adjusted to realistic values based on actual T-38 fleet maintenance data. Operating limitations damage Exceeding real aircraft operating limitations will cause damage depending on the system affected: i.e. flaps jamming, tires blowout, etc

Bird strikes Based on real data for military aircraft, bird strikes could happen if flying at low altitudes. Damage severity and systems affected is based on a probabilistic system. Icing effects on engine and airframe The engines can be damaged when flying in icing conditions without ANTI-ICE system activated. This damage is due to ice accrued on engine intake that is detached and ingested by the compressor causing a FOD. Due to the lack of wing anti-ice devices, the aircraft could see a degradation of its handling qualities and its performance due to ice accrued on its airframe.

II. T-38A ADV Failures description Realism bar: This setting bar enables and simultaneously modifies the probability of failure for all aircraft systems. The realistic position sets the failure probabilities according to values taken from real T-38 fleet maintenance data (USAF source). Moving the realism selector to the right or to the left, will increase or decrease the mentioned probabilities above or below a realistic value. So, moving the selector all the way to the right will increase the probabilities to meet those of a poorly maintained aircraft and doing the opposite (to the left) will reflect an over reliable aircraft. Birds: This option enables the possibility of aircraft mid-air (or on ground!) collisions with birds. The probability of a bird strike will increase with increasing aircraft airspeed and decreasing altitude. So, the best way to have an undesired encounter is flying low & fast. The effects of an impact will depend on the impact zone: fuselage or engines and the strike energy (bird weight / relative speed). The effects will range from a slight engine or fuselage damage to a complete engine loss or severe airframe damage affecting the aircraft handling qualities. Icing: Flying in icing conditions with the engine Anti-Ice in OFF position will cause ice being accrued in the inlet guide vanes and bullet nose of the engine. This will increase the probability of getting an engine FOD (Foreign Object Damage) due to ice being detached from these parts and ingested by the compressor. Aside, the T-38 is not provided with any wing DE-ICE / ANTI-ICE device. Flying in icing conditions will also cause ice being accrued on wings. This will have negative impact on the aircraft handling qualities and performance. As a tip, avoid flying under icing conditions as much as possible!. Realistic Landing gear: This option enables landing gear mechanical characteristics and limitations. With this option enabled, the maximum energy the landing gear can absorb in an impact (a touchdown) is limited to realistic values. Very high sink rates could cause a partial or a total landing gear collapse. Aside, the landing gear tires limitations are modeled. Exceeding the maximum ground speed ( 190kts) could and will damage the nose and/or main gear wheels causing a blowout. Applying full brake action beyond 100kcas is not recommended either, as it could overheat the breaks and wheels and could block the main gear wheels causing tires skidding and a possible blowout due to an excessive tires wear.

Taxing the aircraft off the runway on unprepared terrains may damage the landing gear. Realistic Engine: This option enables realistic GE-J85-5A engine characteristics. Flying at high angles of attack, applying aggressive engine throttle inputs or flying outside the engine operational envelope could (and will) lead to engine compressor stalls or engine flameouts.

Failures explained: The below table explains the causes and/or the effects and behaviours that should be expected with each failure. As can be seen, they range from a minor or negligible degradation of aircraft system functionalities to the total loss of aircraft control. FAILURE GROUP Airframe Horizontal Tail Ailerons Rudder Flaps Airbrakes Hydraulic systems Landing gear Engine / Power Stability Aug. Sys.(SAS) DESCRIPTION This failure is mainly caused due to the delamination in the wing tip resulting in roll and/or yaw control deficiencies. Depending on the level of damage a more or less pronounced aircraft roll and/or yaw tendency will be noticed. Most of the horizontal tail problems are due to improper rigging. This failure could partially or totally affect the flap to horizontal tail interconnect function. In the most critical situation a horizontal tail jamming can occur. In this case, no pitch axis control from stick or trim inputs will be possible after the failure and aircraft ejection will be more than a recommended option. A large percentage of the aileron problems are due to improper adjustments of the rigging. In the most critical case, an aileron jamming can occur. The aircraft roll capability will be affected accordingly. The principal causes of rudder subsystem failures are: improper rigging, hydraulic leaks and access door screw fastenings improperly secured that project sufficiently to hinder rudder movement. In the most critical case a rudder jamming can occur. In this case, yaw axis control will be lost and a residual yaw movement will be found depending on the rudder jamming position. The trailing edge flaps can partially or totally fail to extend or retract (if previously extended) if a flaps system failure occurs. Aside, the flaps can result damaged if extended beyond its maximum extension speed ( 240kcas @ Flaps>46%). In this case, a single or dual flap jamming can occur. A residual roll motion could result due to the flaps asymmetry after the jamming. The airbrakes can partially or totally fail to extend or retract (if previously extended) if an airbrakes system failure occurs. A failure in the Hydraulic System will suppose the total loss of one or both (if a system leakage exists) of the Hyd Sub-Systems: - Flight Controls Hyd - Utility Hyd. The landing gear failures range from a failure to obtain a positive indication of gear up or down to an actual landing gear leg extraction or retraction failure. In the first case, the failure is due to an improperly adjusted landing gear door and can be solved by recycling the landing gear up and down after the initial extension or retraction in order to obtain the proper indication. This failure reflects damage occurred in the engine core (compressor/turbine), the Variable Exhaust Nozzle (VEN) actuation system or the engine power gearbox. Damage will range from unnoticeable effects by the pilot to a complete engine or power gearbox loss, depending on damage severity. If the gearbox is failed, the engine associated generator and hydraulic systems (FLT CTLS or UTILITY) will be lost. A SAS failure will involve different possibilities ranging from an erratic/oscillatory SAS behaviour in the affected axis (either pitch or yaw) to a non responding system (no stability augmentation). If any undamped oscillation is found in either pitch or yaw with the system ON, the corresponding SAS switch should be immediately turned OFF.

III. T-38A ADV FAQs The Nose wheel steering is not working: - The NWS is toggled with the "Tailhook" command. Like in the real aircraft, the NWS is automatically disabled if afterburner operation is selected. Also, once the aircraft weight is off wheels, the NWS is automatically disengaged. It must be manually activated (tailhook) after each landing. Sudden loss of aircraft control after brakes application (realistic landing gear): - The T-38 aircraft is not provided with anti-skid brakes system. This means, the faster you go and the harder the brakes are applied, the higher the heat generated in both, the brakes and the wheels. In extreme cases the wheels could result blocked and a wheel blowout will follow almost inmediately. Wheels blowout at high speeds (realistic landing gear): - If the aircraft ground speed limitation is exceeded (>190kts approx.) landing gear wheels will result damaged and a wheel blowout could happen. When I start the left engine first I can hear the engine sound but I don t see RPM increasing : - That s because the engine instruments need AC current to work. Only the right engine instruments are supplied with AC from a battery operated static inverter. In absence of any external ground power, the right engine should be started first. If both generators are offline (and the battery is ON), only the right engine instruments will work. Engines go "BANG!" and flameout (realistic engine): - The J85-GE-5 engine is an old and tricky engine. If engine operational limitations are not observed, it is relatively easy to enter in the compressor instability zone. This can be caused by several factors: > Rapid engine throttle movements > Selecting afterburner outside its operational envelope > Flying at high AoA or Sideslip angles

- Once the instability be noticed (loud "bangs" heard) the affected engine throttle must be inmediately retarded to idle to recover the compressor and to avoid engine damage. If no corrective action is taken an engine flame-out will follow. Low engine RPMs and engine not responding to throttle commands (realistic engine): - This low rpm condition is caused by a compressor stall ("RPM drop"). In this situation, the FADEC limits the amount of fuel injected to avoid a flameout and/or engine damage. To exit this condition the throttle needs to be retarded to idle and "pumped" starting from this position. Also, the airspeed needs to be increased above 300KIAs to help nominal compressor airflow conditions be restored. Oscillating engine RPMs (realistic engine): - The best indication that the engine has been damaged :) - In this ADV version different sources of engine damage are implemented: compressor/turbine blade mechanical failures, ground collisions, birds ingestion, ice ingestion (see below), etc...also, engine damage level can range from mild damage (small vibrations) to a complete engine loss, in some cases accompained by fire!. - Once any engine damage be noticed or suspected, the emergency procedures should be inmediately applied. Usually, retarding to idle or completely shutting off the affected engine is the safest option. On the other hand, if the engine keeps running while damaged, specially at high RPM regimes, it becomes more and more probable a damage increment and a fire risk with it. Anti-ice...just only cosmetic? (realistic engine): - Not at all! - Flying in icing conditions with the anti-ice system OFF will cause ice being accrued on the inlet guides vanes and engine bullet nose. If the ice results detached (i.e during high-g manoeuvring) and hence ingested by the compressor, an engine FOD damage will happen. - The anti-ice device will have a realistic impact on engine performance and operation.

Engine over-temperature (realistic engine): - EGT values well above 650ºC is the best evidence that something is going wrong in the engine. High engine temperature is caused by engine damage either in its core (compressor/combustion chamber/turbine) or its VEN (Variable Exhaust Nozzle). It could be also a good evidence of an engine fire, of course. - If a VEN failure happens (VEN not changing with RPM or Afterburner) an increased EGT values will be obtained if the exhaust flow is not correctly expanded. This will happen when the exhaust area is smaller than the required one. Flying in an over temperature condition should be always avoided. Engine under-temperature (realistic engine): - This condition is only obtained when a VEN failure occurrs and the exhaust area is bigger than the required one. In this case, the exhaust gas is over expanded. In this case, the most remarkable effect will be a more or less noticeable loss of thrust in the affected engine. I have an engine flame out how/where can I re-start it?: - The J85-GE-5 restart envelope is depicted below. Having a successful engine restart outside the shaded area is very unlikely. Even in the heart of the envelope it can take several attempts before the engine comes to life again.

IMPORTANT! - External Weather modules (Active Sky Next): - It has been observed some interferences with the T-38A ADV Flight Dynamics and engine models when using external weather modules like ASN. Without entering to discuss about their realism...issues are caused by the injection of abrupt changes in the atmospheric variables. So, aside of wind, ambient temperature or pressure are abruptly modified and hence the inputs the T38A ADV model is using. Sudden engine parameter or aircraft attitude changes will be the result. - In order to minimize these unrealistic and unwanted effects, it is recommended to use the following settings with ASN: Turbulence effect scale = 50% (max value) Enhance Turbulence = OFF

Flaps stopped moving & roll-out tendency (realism enabled - Failures interface): - If flaps are operated beyond their structural limits (280 to 350 kias depending on deflection), a flaps system jamming will occurr. If this happens while the system is moving, an asymmetric jam (left/right flap) is very likely to occur and a residual roll tendency will result. The higher the flap asymmetry, the higher the roll tendency that simple. I can t spin this aircraft!!: - The T-38 is a very spin resistant airframe, but this does not mean it is impossible...with the correct technique. During the T-38 development it was found very difficult to force the aircraft into a spin. After several failed attempts, it was found that the pilot needed to perform a PIO like manoeuvre in pitch at very low speed, high pitch attitude and AoA conditions in order to force the spin. Adding some lateral stick will help in some occasions (no rudder needed). With that very unnatural pilot commands the resulting inertial coupling in combination with a reduced stability will do the rest. However, it was finally concluded that even when applying such abnormal control combinations (no "operational" at all) the spin was very difficult to get. - A good proof of the T-38 trainer spin resistance is that not a single T-38 aircraft has been lost in a spin related incident. Ok, I m in a spin...now, how to exit?!!: - The T-38 has two spin modes. The first one is a pitch and roll oscillatory mode, usually happening at the first stages of the spin development. The second mode (fully developed spin) is characterized by a quite flat spin with very steady yaw rotation (about 90-120 deg/s) with the nose slightly below the horizon and with no roll oscillations. - Once the spin confirmed, the recovery actions MUST be IMMEDIATELY applied: full aileron in direction of spin, full opposite rudder and full after stick (erect spin) - If no positive recovery is obtained after 4 or 5 gyrations from the spin start it is very likely that the spin start transitioning to its flat-steady mode which has been demonstrated unrecoverable. In this case, EJECT!! EJECT EJECT!!!...I try to raise the handgrip but: - Sorry, no ejection sequence implemented

Electrical failures not modeled why??!: - Simply, because there are no records of a dual electrical system failure (dual generator loss) nor AC crossover system failure in this aircraft. Electrical system redundancy will make transparent for the pilot any single system failure.