Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

2017 Mobility Report

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

Urban Transportation in the United States: A Time for Leadership

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

Dulles Corridor Air Rights Study Investigation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Final Report. Refining the Real-Timed Urban Mobility Report. Tim Lomax, Shawn Turner, Bill Eisele, David Schrank, Lauren Geng, and Brian Shollar

Click to edit Master title style

Summary FEBRUARY 2019

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

AUGUST 2015 URBAN MOBILITY. Scorecard

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

5.6 ENERGY IMPACT DISCUSSION. No Build Alternative

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

1 On Time Performance

3.17 Energy Resources

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - All 471 Areas Sum There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Performance Measure Summary - All 471 Areas Sum Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 228,888 227,593 226,357 225,103 222,874 Commuters (1000s) 109,866 109,700 109,557 109,405 109,238 Freeway 1,920 1,905 1,880 1,855 1,829 Arterial Streets 2,065 2,045 2,025 2,003 1,985 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.20 3.51 3.30 3.40 2.75 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.50 3.90 3.65 3.75 3.01 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 32 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 25 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 4.39 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (million gallons) 3,122 3,074 3,023 2,884 2,851 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 19 19 18 18 18 Total Delay (millions of person-hours) 6,922 6,815 6,702 5,520 5,457 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 42 42 41 41 40 Travel Time Index 1.22 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.20 Commuter Stress Index 1.29 -- -- -- -- Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 2.41 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ billions) 159.12 153.33 149.12 144.13 137.32 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 960 961 959 959 970

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 221,651 219,412 216,234 216,290 212,016 Commuters (1000s) 109,087 108,902 108,652 108,443 108,186 Freeway 1,811 1,800 1,839 1,820 1,793 Arterial Streets 1,967 1,960 1,986 1,970 1,945 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.28 3.51 3.06 2.70 2.36 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.62 4.18 3.44 2.87 2.53 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (million gallons) 2,813 2,755 3,234 3,197 3,167 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 17 18 18 17 17 Total Delay (millions of person-hours) 5,428 5,229 5,876 5,941 5,909 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 40 42 42 42 41 Travel Time Index 1.20 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 Total Cost ($ billions) 133.34 138.22 134.69 127.27 118.37 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 967 996 1,034 1,043 1,048

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 207,415 202,169 195,464 191,811 190,829 Commuters (1000s) 107,973 107,823 107,769 107,683 107,577 Freeway 1,736 1,672 1,586 1,540 1,499 Arterial Streets 1,895 1,816 1,736 1,688 1,667 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.01 1.57 1.45 1.61 1.59 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.99 1.53 1.39 1.57 1.52 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (million gallons) 3,017 2,831 2,665 2,512 2,386 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 17 17 16 15 14 Total Delay (millions of person-hours) 5,612 5,270 4,966 4,701 4,496 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 41 40 39 38 37 Travel Time Index 1.21 1.20 1.20 1.19 1.19 Total Cost ($ billions) 108.34 99.68 93.93 88.68 82.63 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,049 1,034 1,014 983 962

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 185,494 183,415 180,764 177,030 174,524 Commuters (1000s) 107,564 107,451 107,403 107,280 107,210 Freeway 1,459 1,411 1,369 1,333 1,294 Arterial Streets 1,628 1,584 1,564 1,541 1,502 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.23 1.12 1.24 1.28 1.20 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.17 1.18 1.28 1.36 1.24 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (million gallons) 2,277 2,116 2,015 1,902 1,779 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 13 13 12 12 11 Total Delay (millions of person-hours) 4,296 4,002 3,848 3,640 3,420 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 36 35 34 32 31 Travel Time Index 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.16 Total Cost ($ billions) 74.60 69.44 65.92 61.53 56.32 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 945 915 881 852 826

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 172,003 169,747 169,564 167,118 163,963 Commuters (1000s) 107,083 106,913 106,706 106,429 106,326 Freeway 1,251 1,208 1,176 1,111 1,084 Arterial Streets 1,461 1,412 1,369 1,308 1,279 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.10 1.15 1.17 1.14 1.10 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.14 1.18 1.20 1.23 1.11 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (million gallons) 1,638 1,571 1,499 1,409 1,365 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 11 10 9 9 8 Total Delay (millions of person-hours) 3,192 3,064 2,903 2,727 2,662 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 30 29 28 27 26 Travel Time Index 1.15 1.15 1.14 1.14 1.13 Total Cost ($ billions) 51.43 47.18 43.44 39.87 36.13 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 800 769 745 723 707

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 161,962 159,198 155,991 152,328 150,254 Commuters (1000s) 106,129 106,000 105,975 105,896 105,826 Freeway 1,046 995 931 882 833 Arterial Streets 1,247 1,214 1,163 1,157 1,110 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.12 1.03 1.03 1.01 1.32 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.09 1.00 1.01 0.98 1.29 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (million gallons) 1,279 1,153 999 883 753 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 7 7 7 7 6 Total Delay (millions of person-hours) 2,514 2,291 1,991 1,794 1,557 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 25 24 23 22 21 Travel Time Index 1.13 1.12 1.12 1.11 1.11 Total Cost ($ billions) 32.39 29.10 26.33 23.91 22.97 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 702 694 676 658 631

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 148,335 146,798 144,276 Commuters (1000s) 105,812 105,623 105,373 Freeway 791 742 698 Arterial Streets 1,051 1,047 979 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.33 1.36 1.43 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.30 1.33 1.39 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (million gallons) 648 585 533 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 6 5 5 Total Delay (millions of person-hours) 1,345 1,228 1,118 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 20 19 18 Travel Time Index 1.10 1.10 1.09 Commuter Stress Index -- -- -- Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Total Cost ($ billions) 20.89 18.73 17.17 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 609 591 569