Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Click to edit Master title style

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Final Report. Refining the Real-Timed Urban Mobility Report. Tim Lomax, Shawn Turner, Bill Eisele, David Schrank, Lauren Geng, and Brian Shollar

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 7/31/2013

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 52,230 51,700 51,105 50,545 50,025 Commuters (1000s) 26,157 26,154 25,924 25,715 25,398 Freeway 493,249 493,930 476,765 493,653 488,326 Arterial Streets 436,804 438,882 441,505 447,904 442,626 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.33 3.56 3.53 3.36 2.75 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.67 3.92 3.93 3.71 3.01 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 31 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 26 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 3.75 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 796,444 780,028 764,542 745,517 728,576 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 21 21 20 20 19 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 1,717,129 1,680,553 1,646,255 1,606,060 1,569,824 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 45 44 44 43 43 Travel Time Index 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.22 1.22 Commuter Stress Index 1.28 1.28 1.27 1.27 1.27 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 2.46 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 39,716 39,507 39,282 39,105 39,430 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,045 1,039 1,033 1,028 1,038

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 49,371 48,795 48,230 47,550 46,910 Commuters (1000s) 24,993 24,608 24,187 23,713 23,237 Freeway 479,232 472,980 482,625 474,570 466,085 Arterial Streets 437,446 438,075 442,590 440,400 436,385 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.30 3.47 3.02 2.67 2.34 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.61 4.17 3.43 2.90 2.56 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 706,384 732,173 726,745 711,518 691,228 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 19 19 19 19 18 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 1,522,074 1,580,157 1,568,564 1,535,049 1,489,531 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 42 44 45 44 44 Travel Time Index 1.22 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23 Commuter Stress Index 1.26 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28 Total Cost ($ millions) 38,864 40,174 41,426 41,657 41,787 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,023 1,057 1,091 1,098 1,102

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 46,385 45,615 44,860 44,070 43,205 Commuters (1000s) 22,859 22,364 21,682 20,962 20,239 Freeway 455,705 440,385 424,265 411,975 400,150 Arterial Streets 430,035 420,595 408,320 397,660 387,430 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.97 1.56 1.42 1.55 1.57 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.01 1.53 1.41 1.59 1.55 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 669,966 639,702 611,789 582,029 547,599 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 18 17 16 16 15 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 1,441,675 1,375,375 1,313,897 1,248,605 1,174,005 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 43 42 41 40 39 Travel Time Index 1.22 1.22 1.21 1.21 1.20 Commuter Stress Index 1.27 1.26 1.26 1.25 1.25 Total Cost ($ millions) 41,828 40,976 40,029 38,643 37,369 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 1,104 1,082 1,059 1,025 994

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 42,450 41,810 41,265 40,555 39,845 Commuters (1000s) 19,552 18,959 18,424 17,824 17,236 Freeway 390,010 378,480 366,985 355,445 342,165 Arterial Streets 378,195 368,670 361,030 351,500 340,750 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.21 1.12 1.22 1.29 1.19 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.22 1.21 1.31 1.38 1.27 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 515,509 483,072 455,937 428,686 399,533 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 14 13 12 12 11 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 1,104,739 1,034,002 975,154 916,183 853,849 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 38 36 35 34 33 Travel Time Index 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.17 Commuter Stress Index 1.24 1.23 1.22 1.22 1.21 Total Cost ($ millions) 36,337 34,766 33,291 32,009 30,721 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 969 929 892 862 831

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 39,145 38,485 37,815 37,200 36,415 Commuters (1000s) 16,683 16,141 15,621 15,113 14,556 Freeway 328,050 312,950 296,795 281,835 272,410 Arterial Streets 328,825 316,040 305,175 294,340 283,915 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.10 1.14 1.15 1.14 1.10 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.17 1.22 1.22 1.25 1.13 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 369,731 339,692 312,913 289,127 264,131 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 10 9 9 8 7 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 790,507 726,888 670,089 619,375 564,723 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 31 29 28 26 25 Travel Time Index 1.16 1.15 1.14 1.13 1.13 Commuter Stress Index 1.20 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.17 Total Cost ($ millions) 29,240 27,573 26,186 24,935 23,721 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 794 749 713 680 649

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 35,730 35,215 34,515 33,955 33,430 Commuters (1000s) 14,180 13,849 13,469 13,126 12,828 Freeway 259,821 248,290 234,940 221,590 208,945 Arterial Streets 274,195 268,055 257,470 250,360 240,355 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.13 1.04 1.04 1.02 1.33 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.10 1.01 1.02 0.99 1.30 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 241,606 219,327 198,153 181,334 165,418 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 7 6 5 5 5 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 516,361 469,247 423,797 387,954 353,858 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 23 22 20 19 17 Travel Time Index 1.12 1.11 1.10 1.10 1.09 Commuter Stress Index 1.16 1.15 1.14 1.14 1.13 Total Cost ($ millions) 22,864 21,771 20,483 19,436 18,059 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 626 594 559 531 494

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 32,920 32,485 30,450 Commuters (1000s) 12,529 12,274 11,407 Freeway 199,065 187,365 168,475 Arterial Streets 232,170 223,400 204,750 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.35 1.38 1.44 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.31 1.34 1.40 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 150,072 136,509 116,868 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 4 4 3 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 321,296 292,020 249,117 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 16 15 14 Travel Time Index 1.08 1.08 1.07 Commuter Stress Index 1.12 1.12 1.11 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 16,977 16,102 14,160 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 464 441 409