Opportunities for High Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Development Midwest Projects Northeast Corridor (NEC) current & next generation

Similar documents
Update of the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative. Tim Hoeffner Michigan Department of Transportation Director, Office of Rail Lansing, MI

Expanding Capacity for the Northeast Corridor The Gateway Program

Meeting the Transportation Challenge in the Northeast

Amtrak Overview. Marc Magliari. Indiana High Speed Rail Association. May 13, 2011

Joseph H. Boardman President and CEO, Amtrak

The Northeast Corridor Master Plan Amtrak s Next Generation High-Speed Rail and Northeastern Maryland

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

The Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor

An Overview of High Speed Rail. David Randall Peterman Congressional Research Service

Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

Program. presented by: September 22, 2010

New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Project Gateway to New England. Program Update March 14, 2011 Revised & Updated March 31, 2011

Funding Source / Project Type. Funding Amount* Applicant Name

Successful Passenger Rail in the State of California

Development of 220 mph High Speed Rail Service for Illinois. Mark C. Walbrun, PE TranSystems Corporation

Sand loader. Source: Southwestern Planning Commission

UPGRADING THE AMTRAK KEYSTONE CORRIDOR

2012 MULTIMODAL OPERATIONS WORKSHOP

New Haven Hartford Springfield Rail

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

Eurailspeed Parallel Session C.3. Albrecht P. Engel Vice Chairman High Speed Ground Transportation Association Chicago, USA

DRAFT Subject to modifications

Economic Impacts. Midwest Regional Rail System. of the. A Transportation Network for the 21st Century

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

SMART INVESTMENTS IN INTERCITY PASSENGER TRAVEL FACILITIES: A BALANCED MULTI-MODAL APPROACH

Needs and Community Characteristics

16.0 INTERCITY TRAVEL

NEW HAVEN-HARTFORD-SPRINGFIELD LINE HIGH SPEED INTERCITY RAIL PROJECT

Introducing the Solution to LA s Airport Congestion Problem

Working to implement a 21 st century passenger rail system by adding the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative network and additional state-supported

The Status of Passenger Rail Improvements in the Region and Plans for the Future

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

Ohio Passenger Rail Development. Northwest Ohio Passenger Rail Association

Oakland County Board of Commissioners General Government Committee April 23, SMART Services in Oakland County

Amtrak Fleet Strategy

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

LAST MILE / TERMINAL AREA PLANNING ISSUES WEBINAR SUMMARY AASHTO RAIL RESOURCE CENTER JULY 12, 2017

Rail~Volution 2012 R. Gregg Albright

The Latest on Joint Development Policy Guidance

Overview of Regional Commuter Rail Webinar: Phoenix, Arizona December 18, 2013

Chicago to St. Louis High-Speed Rail. IDOT District 8 Crossings. July 29, 2015

Public Meeting Thursday, Dec. 15, 2011 Chicago Union Station Union Gallery Room. Welcome

WhoWhatWhenWhereWhy. (lists only those in proposed Midwest-Northeast HSR Corridor) SOURCE: America 2050

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

NEC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS OF RELEVANCE TO NEW JERSEY

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Southern California - CHSRA

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Charlotte Gateway Station A State & City Partnership June 24, 2015

Georgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

UNION STATION MASTER PLAN STUDY

Proposal for September 2006 Start of Commuter Rail from Lovejoy on the Macon Line to Atlanta

Scope of Services January 26, Project Development and Conceptual Engineering for City of Lake Forest Amtrak Station

ALAMEDA CORRIDOR. A A Project of National Significance. TRB Summer Conference MTS as a Component of the Nation s Transportation System June 25, 2002

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Northeast Corridor New York to Philadelphia

New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Project Gateway to New England. Public Hearing June

A Vision for High-Speed Rail in the Northeast Corridor

Benchmarking Efficiency for MTA Services. Citizens Budget Commission April 6 th 2011

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

ACT 89: THE FOUNDATION TO REBUILD SEPTA FOR THE FUTURE JOSEPH M. CASEY GENERAL MANAGER

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

Central Loop Bus Rapid Transit

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

CrossRail Chicago. CrossRail Chicago, a modern vision for transportation in our region. 1:00 1:00. Union Station 0:30 1:00

Contents. Executive Summary...1 Introduction...2 Operating Plan...4 System Connectivity...5

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

The Future of Rail in Maryland. Kevin B. Quinn, Jr. Administrator

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

U.S. System Summary: CALIFORNIA

Overview: Division of Rail & Mass Transportation

The Future of Transportation on the Caltrain Corridor

THE PARTNERSHIP OF RAIL & COAL MOVING AHEAD 2014 RMCMI ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 2014

The Smart Growth Countywide Transit Master Plan

Click to edit Master title style

State Safety Oversight Program

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Chicago St. Louis High-Speed Rail. Braidwood Construction Public Meeting. August 7, 2014

High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

The Global Evolution of HSR. Lessons from the Spanish Experience. Application to U.S. High Speed Rail Acknowledgements CONTENT

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Redefining Mobility Ready or not: Autonomous and connected vehicle planning and policy, now and in the future

Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Policies

TXDOT PLANNING CONFERENCE. Quincy D. Allen, P.E. Houston District Engineer June 16, 2016

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

Wyoming Energy Projects

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Illinois High Speed Rail Project. Dave Orrell General Director Construction / Public Projects

Transcription:

Opportunities for High Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Development Midwest Projects Northeast Corridor (NEC) current & next generation Mike Franke, P.E. Assistant V.P., Amtrak Policy & Development

Basic facts about Amtrak Chartered by Congress as national intercity passenger railroad; opened for business on May 1, 1971 20,000 employees operate a 21,100 mile system 60% of trains operate at top speeds in excess of 90 mph (145 kph) The Acela Express is the fastest train in North America Top speed of 150 mph (241kph) Recovered 141% of operating expense in FY10 Amtrak covers about 76% of operating costs with ticket revenue; total revenue covers 85% of operating costs 1

Amtrak services Acela Express Northeast Corridor (NEC) 150 mph Acela and 125 mph Regional services Links New York, Boston, and Washington (electrified) 457 mi route, 153 of 308 daily Amtrak trains operate on some portion of the NEC Positive train control system in use Short distance trains/corridors (86-750 mi) Services range from 59 mph operations in unsignaled territory up to 110 mph w/automatic train stop and/or cab signals Pacific Surfliner 2-32 daily trains, depending on route (most diesel) 15 states provide operating support for Amtrak services Long Distance Trains (up to 2,438 mi) California Zephyr Fifteen trains, most daily (two tri-weekly trains) Most include sleeping and dining car service 1 train in each direction, diesel-powered for most or all of route 2

Persons per hour What role can passenger rail play? CO 2 Emissions by Mode 2.4% 2.7% 2.3% 9.1% 0.6% 21.4% 27.5% 33.9% Passenger cars Light-duty trucks All other trucks Busses Aircraft Ships and boats Freight and passenger rail Other Rail is inherently: Energy-efficient Clean Scalable Source: EPA Modal Capacity Per Meter of Width 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 9000 3000 5200 2000 1000 200 1500 0 Auto Bus Bus lane Rail (separate) Source: Int l Union of Railways Can access city centers on existing rights-of-way Provides an affordable means of capacity expansion 3

Amtrak Midwestern Operations Chicago Union Station is the hub for Midwestern services Served by 56 daily Amtrak trains, plus Metra Frequency varies - Cardinal operates 3 times a week - Hiawatha has 7 daily departures State of Illinois supports 3 services Lincoln Service, Chicago-St. Louis (4 daily round trips) Illini/Saluki, Chicago-Carbondale (2 daily round trips) Illinois Zephyr/Carl Sandburg, Chicago-Quincy (2 daily round trips) FRA s High Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Grant program has made significant funding available for several routes 4

Riders Amtrak in Illinois, 2006-2010 Daily Departures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Illinois Corridor Ridership Growth, 2006-2010 1,000,000 Chicago-St. Louis 3 5 5 5 5 800,000 600,000 400,000 Chicago- Carbondale Chicago- Quincy 2 3 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 200,000 0 Chicago-St. Louis 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Chicago-Carbondale Fiscal Year Chicago-Quincy Chicago-Milwaukee Major service change on 3 downstate routes, November 2006 General Assembly doubled Illinois DOT Amtrak funding Corridor trains added to all three downstate routes, national network service by overnight trains maintained as a foundation Illinois shares Hiawatha Service cost with Wisconsin (25% Ill./75% Wisc.) These are successful state services that would be enhanced by new service to the Quad Cities & Rockford/Dubuque in the next two years 5

Other Midwestern State Partners Wisconsin one state-supported, one National Network route Hiawatha, Milwaukee-Chicago (7/6 state-supported round-trips) Empire Builder, Chicago-Seattle/Portland (station upgrades) Michigan two state-supported, one National Network route Pere Marquette, Grand Rapids-Chicago (1 state-supported round-trip) Blue Water, Port Huron-Lansing-Chicago (1 state-supported round-trip) Wolverines, Pontiac/Detroit-Ann Arbor-Chicago (capital improvements) Missouri one state-supported, two National Network routes Missouri River Runner, St. Louis-Kansas City (2 state-supported round trips) Texas Eagle, Chicago-San Antonio/Los Angeles (station upgrades) Southwest Chief, Chicago-Los Angeles (station upgrades) 6

Other Midwestern State Partners Iowa one planned state-supported, two National Network routes Iowa City/Des Moines extension from Illinois Quad Cities (pending) Southwest Chief, Chicago-Los Angeles (station upgrades) California Zephyr, Chicago-San Francisco Bay (capital improvements) Texas one state-supported, one National Network route Heartland Flyer, Fort Worth-Oklahoma City (1 state-supported round-trip) Texas Eagle, Chicago-San Antonio/Los Angeles (station upgrades) Sunset Limited, Los Angeles-New Orleans (station upgrades) Oklahoma one state-supported route Heartland Flyer, Oklahoma City-Fort Worth (1 state-supported round-trip) 7

The Midwest Regional Rail Initiative Implement improvements on a regional basis to gain efficiencies and economies of scale that are not available to individual states Use of 3,000 miles of existing freight rail and commuter rights-of-way to connect rural, small urban, and major metropolitan areas Operation of a hub-and-spoke system providing service to and through Chicago to locations throughout the Midwest Introduction of state-of-the-art train equipment operating at speeds up to 110 mph WiFi access Food service Power outlets at each seat In addition to current routes, provide rail service to Midwest areas not presently served by passenger rail Dedicated network of feeder bus service Modernized stations and facilities 7 of 8 MWRRI States are included in the National HSR Corridor System 8

Latest round of HSIPR grants Announced on May 9, 2011 More than $2.02 billion 22 projects in 15 states $404M to expand service in the Midwest $186.3M will go to improve the Chicago-St. Louis corridor - Previous grants will raise top speed on the St. Louis-Dwight segment to 110mph - New grant will make similar improvements on the Dwight-Joliet segment $196.5M will go to improve the Chicago-Detroit-Pontiac corridor - Trains can currently operate at 95mph on Amtrak-owned line between Porter, IN and Kalamazoo, MI - Funding will allow signal and track improvements needed to raise speeds to 110mph on the 235 mile Porter-Dearborn segment Remaining funds will support environmental, planning, and preliminary engineering work on projects in - Michigan - Minnesota - Missouri 9

Chicago-St. Louis corridor With $1.142 billion, the Illinois grant for the Chicago-St. Louis portion of the corridor will be upgraded to 110 mph by improving tracks, signals, and roadway crossings; also included is the installation of PTC, as well as planning studies for additional service enhancements Initial investment will result in faster service by decreasing trip times by more than an hour between end points Completion of work contemplated under this grant will set stage for another round of investments to permit an eventual increase to eight round trip frequencies per day on Chicago-St. Louis corridor 10

Chicago-St. Louis corridor 11

Amtrak Michigan Line Amtrak Lines in Michigan and adjacent states Wolverine service Other Amtrak services Amtrak currently owns 97 miles (Porter-Kalamazoo) of our 304 mile Chicago-Detroit- Pontiac route Amtrak-owned NS-owned Michigan working to acquire Dearborn-Kalamazoo NS line Planned Federal investment in this route (including Chicago-Porter, Indiana and Englewood Flyover) in the vicinity of $600 million We have a strong partner in the state of Michigan Since 1990, state has invested about $65M in equipment and infrastructure This is the opportunity of a lifetime 12

Planned Federal investment in the Michigan Line Chicago-Porter, IN (NS-owned) 8 separate improvements as part of Indiana Gateway to relieve congestion and reduce delays ($71M) Kalamazoo-Dearborn Line (currently NS-owned) ($346M) Funding for purchase and improvement by state of Michigan, subject to STB approval Bring up to Michigan Line standards (PTC, 110mph top speed, etc) Additional $3.2M for service development plan and environmental work Construct new West Detroit connection track ($7.9M) Station improvements Construct new Dearborn Intermodal Station ($28M) Construct new platform, facilities at Troy ($8.5M) Renovate Battle Creek station ($3.2M) Preliminary engineering and environmental work for new Ann Arbor station ($2.8M) CREATE investments in Englewood Flyover ($133M) and Grand Crossing will also help Michigan Line Total planned investment will exceed $600M 13

CREATE Projects Benefiting Passenger Rail Rail congestion in and around Chicago is a major challenge Passenger Rail Delay Reduction a goal of CREATE 19 projects benefit Amtrak 21 projects benefit Metra Note: Projects benefiting passenger rail service are shown in red 14

CREATE supports the larger vision for the MWRRI 15

Englewood Flyover A bridge designed to eliminate the rail junction at 63 rd and State Englewood Flyover Total cost will be $133M (funded by HSIPR) Will separate an at-grade crossing of an NS main, and eliminate daily conflicts between: 78 Metra Rock Island commuter trains 14 Amtrak trains 46 NS trains 16

Amtrak Northeast Corridor More than half our daily trains (153 of 305), more than 1,800 daily commuter trains Carries more than 722,000 riders every day! Acela Express on the 1835 Canton Viaduct at 125mph Susquehanna River Bridge, 1907 We own (and maintain) 363 of the 457 routemiles 17 tunnels (six of them under the Hudson River) 1,186 bridges (14 of them moveable) Top speeds of 150 mph for Acela Express and 125 mph for Northeast Regionals Baltimore s B&P Tunnel: In continuous service since 1873 We carry more passengers than all the airlines put together between: NYC and Boston NYC and Washington, DC 17

Key Concepts Existing system serves as a foundation for development Terminal facilities Suitable segments are upgraded Existing network feeds high speed operations Most foreign systems have developed in this incremental fashion France - TGV lines use major terminals at endpoints - Speeds gradually upgraded as technology permitted St. Pancras Station, London then, and now Germany - High speed equipment preceded high speed lines - Gradual introduction of faster track segments allowed ICE trains to realize their capabilities 18

A quick comparison Amtrak Keystone Corridor Improvements (2006) Madrid-Valladolid high speed line (Dec 2007) Route 104 mile line (Philadelphia- Harrisburg) 111 mile line (Madrid- Valladolid) Scope of improvements Restored electrification, improved track and signals for 110 mph service Constructed dedicated ROW for 186 mph service, including a 28 km tunnel Segovia-Guiomar station Intermediate stops 10 intermediate stops, shared ROW with Norfolk Southern and SEPTA 1 intermediate stop Trip time improvement Harrisburg-Philly trip cut from 1:50 to 1:35 Trip time cut from 1:30 to 55 minutes Annual Ridership 1,183,821 riders in FY 08 825,043 riders in 2008 Frequency 14 daily trains 33 daily trains 2007-2008 Growth 20.1% More than 800% Program cost $145 million $5.9 billion Harrisburg station Alberto Saviejo photo 19

NEC Stair-Steps to Next-Gen HSR Vision NEC Gateway: Newark to NYC 160 mph Service South of NYC Acela II Fleet Doubles Capacity 40% Increase in Acela Capacity Next Gen HSR to Boston Next Gen HSR North to Hartford Next Gen HSR South to Wash D.C. Next Gen HSR MOS: NYC to PHL Fast-Track HSR Program Full Next-Gen HSR Network 20

NEC Next Generation High Speed Rail NYC Boston Alignment Diverges north of New Rochelle to serve Conn. and RI Converges with NEC alignment at Rt. 128 station in Mass. NYC - Washington Substantially parallels NEC New stations in Baltimore and Philadelphia more centrally located Analyzed Alignment used for costing and analysis purposes, subject to further analysis in next phase 21

Next-Gen High-Speed Rail : Dramatic Trip Time Reduction World-Class High-Speed Network: Dedicated 2 - track alignment; 220 mph equipment 40% - 60% travel-time reductions in key markets Boston Washington DC: from 6:30 to 3:20 NYC - DC 1:36 NYC - BOS 1:24 Existing Master Plan (2030) 2:42 2:15 3:35 3:08 Next-Gen HSR Plan Higher frequency Service Departures (Each Direction) Current Next-Gen HSR Hourly 1 3-4 Daily 10-15 53-73 Higher average speeds Average Speeds (Super Express) Current Next-Gen HSR NYC - BOS 104 kph 238 kph NYC - DC 136 kph 220 kph 22

Annual Ridership (Millions) Annual ridership (Millions) Next-Gen High Speed Rail : Quantum Ridership Leap Huge ridership growth over Master Plan:2020 to 2040 Master Plan: 16 million to 23 million (+46%) Next-Gen HSR Plan: 16 million to 34 million (+111% ) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Next-Gen Compared to Master Plan Next Gen Master Plan 38 34 25 16 25 23 21 12 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Major growth in premium service s share of NEC ridership (2040) Result: Next-Gen HSR Plan would raise revenues more than ridership 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Premium Ridership (2040) Master Plan (Acela): 6.5 million (28%) Next-Gen HSR Plan: 18 million (52%) Ridership by Type of Service 12 3 9 Regular Rail Service Acela Next-Gen HSR 16 5 11 25 11 34 18 38 20 14 16 18 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 23

NEC Gateway Keystone of the plan creating capacity where it s most needed Involves major capacity expansion Add extra tracks between Newark and Penn Station Build two new tunnels under the Hudson River Build Moynihan Station Add extra commuter rail capacity at Penn Station When commuter services get investment, high speed services get operational fluidity 24

New York-Philadelphia dedicated HSR Line The minimum operable segment concept: Existing line would be improved to raise speeds to 160 mph (short term) Separate HSR line could be built to provide dedicated 220mph express service (mid- to long term) Each improvement will generate Initial rounds of improvement will greatly increase capacity Subsequent rounds will increase speed, provide jumping-off point for later rounds of HSR construction 25

Opportunities for partnership Amtrak is very interested in opportunities for high speed rail partnerships We are modernizing our plant but we are also modernizing our organization and culture Working on programs to develop a more collaborative organization Make maximum use of talent Pass on the core skills and functions as we manage a generational transition Transform the way we deal with business partners, customers and each other We have sought partners who can work with us in a joint bid on HSR projects, reaching agreements with KPMG, DWH Strategic Advisors, Sharon Greene & Associates and TranSystems for NEC Next-Gen 26

The way ahead HSR projects are enormous undertakings and to succeed, we must organize so that: A consortium of partners can deliver all of the needed capabilities The system itself delivers benefits long before build-out is complete Connectivity is vital to success and a plan that incorporates feeder routes from one or many modes will be much more useful than one that does not Amtrak is very interested in pursuing HSR projects We have selected a strong suite of commercial partners We have a lot of experience working with state partners Projects like these represent the future of rail and can deliver meaningful results that will improve our quality of life 27