Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

Similar documents
TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

December 5, Red Bank Planning Board Municipal Building 90 Monmouth Street Red Bank, NJ 07701

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

VOA Vista Drive Residential housing Development TIA Project #13915 TABLE OF CONTENTS

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Traffic Engineering Study

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia

Critical Movement* Delay (sec/veh) Critical Movement* LOS 8 a.m. 9 a.m. B 25.2 C. 3 p.m. 4 p.m. B 17.3 B

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Section 5.8 Transportation and Traffic

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

One Harbor Point Residential

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

IV. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND

Intersection Control Evaluation

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:

Interchange Operations Study

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Appendix Q Traffic Study

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

Traffic Impact Study for the proposed. Town of Allegany, New York. August Project No Prepared For:

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS


Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VICDOM BROCK ROAD PIT EXPANSION

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality

Perris Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis City of Perris, California

P07033 US 50 EB Weaving Analysis between El Dorado Hills and Silva Valley Ramp Metering Analysis for US 50 EB On-Ramp at Latrobe Road

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

MADERAS HOTEL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Transportation Planner III & Jorge Cuyuch Transportation Engineer I

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Appendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study

Mineola Village Green

HIGHWAY 28 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN

Appendix C. Traffic Study

Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis

Memorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017

STANDARD LIMITATIONS

MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA

Existing Traffic Conditions

Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

MULTILANE HIGHWAYS. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 CHAPTER 21 CONTENTS

Airport Road Improvements

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Interchange Justification Report

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA. Prepared For:

LCPS Valley Service Center

LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Traffic Feasibility Study

Transcription:

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California DRAFT REPORT Prepared By Tulare County Association of Governments (TCAG) April 2013

Table of Contents Introduction:... 3 Project Purpose:... 3 Study Area:... 3 Methodology:... 5 Existing Operations Analysis:... 9 2035 Operations Analysis:... 10 Conclusions:... 11 Recommendations:... 11 List of Figures Figure 1: Project Location Map... 4 Figure 2: 2012 Intersection Geometrics and Turning Movement Counts...7 Figure 3: 2035 Intersection Geometrics and Turning Movement Counts... 8 List of Tables Table 1: Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service... 6 Table 2: Shirk Road at State Route 198 Intersection Analysis... 10 Appendix A Intersection Turning Movement Analysis Data Sheets Appendix B Intersection Signalization Analysis Data Sheets Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 2 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

Introduction: State Route 198 in Tulare County extends from the Kings County line eastward to Sequoia National Park, a distance of approximately 50 miles. In the vicinity of Shirk Avenue (the study area) SR 198 consists of a four lane divided freeway separated by guardrail median barriers. According to Caltrans, the annual average daily traffic volumes (AADT) in the vicinity of SR 198 and Shirk Road interchange is between 42,500 to 54,000 vehicles per day. 1 Project Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess current (2012) and future (2035) intersection levels of service at the Shirk Road and State Route 198 interchange to assist in determining if future mitigation is necessary to improve traffic flow through the area. Study Area: The study area consisted of the intersections at Shirk Road and the westbound and eastbound ramps to State Route 198. Shirk Road is major north-south arterial connecting southwest Visalia with the Visalia Industrial Park and the Community of Goshen. In the early 1990 s Shirk Avenue existed as a stop controlled, at grade intersection crossing SR 198 west of the City of Visalia. As a result of the State Route 198-Visalia Widening Project in 2000, Shirk Road was constructed as a grade separated crossing with diamond-shaped on-off ramps to Stare Route 198 (aerial photo below, and Figure 1): 2 California Department of Transportation, Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency, Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic on the California State Highway System, (Traffic and Vehicle Data System, 2011), pp. 152-153. Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 3 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 4 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

Methodology: Level of Service: The intersections at the State Route 198 and Shirk Road interchange at were analyzed for existing and 2035 operating conditions (approach delay and LOS). Data for the analysis was based on AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts collected by TCAG staff on October 30, 2012. Data was collected during normal traffic operations (i.e. Tuesday through Thursday of non-holiday weeks when school is in session). Count data was obtained during the hours of 6 a.m.to 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. on 15 minute intervals. Based on the data collected, the AM and PM peak hour for State Route 198 at Shirk Road was determined to be: EB Ramp Junction WB Ramp Junction AM Peak Hour: 7:30 8:30 AM 7:15 8:15 AM PM Peak Hour: 4:30 5:30 PM 4:30 5:30 PM Existing and future traffic operations were evaluated through the determination of intersection LOS. LOS is a qualitative measure of traffic operating conditions, whereby a letter grade A through F is assigned to an intersection or roadway segment representing progressively worsening traffic conditions, Table 1. LOS is determined for different intersection control types using the methods documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010) as provided in Appendix A. It should be noted that during data collection, staff observed three near side-impact collisions during the peak hour counting period. This demonstrates the importance of analyzing the SR 198 / Shirk Road interchange for possible intersection control. Signal Warrants: Each intersection was evaluated for traffic signal warrants described in Part 4 of Chapter 4C of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). The traffic signal warrant provides a procedure to determine input into the decision of whether or not conditions warrant the installation or the continued operation of a traffic signal. Warrant #3, the Peak Hour warrant was used for the analysis. Warrant #3 applies where traffic conditions are such that for a minimum of 1 hour of an average day, the minor-street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street. The fact that an intersection meets traffic warrant does not necessarily mean that signalization is required. The MUTCD suggests that a detailed engineering analysis be performed before making a final determination. Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 5 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

Table 1 Level of Service Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Average Control Delay (sec/veh) A 0-10 B >10-15 C >15-25 D >25-35 E >35-50 F >50 Unsignalized intersections Level of Service descriptions are provided as follows: Level of Service A - describes operations where there is very little, to no confliction traffic for a minor side street movement, i.e. an average control delay up to 10 seconds per vehicle. Level of Service B describes operations with average control delay greater than 10 and up to 15 seconds per vehicle. Level of Service C describes operations with average control delay greater than 15 and up to 25 seconds per vehicle. Level of Service D describes operations with average control delay greater than 25 and up to 35 seconds per vehicle. Level of Service E describes operations with average control delay greater than 35 and up to 50 seconds per vehicle. Level of Service F describes operations with average control delay greater 50 seconds per vehicle. LOS F exists when there are insufficient gaps of suitable size to allow a side street demand to cross safely through or enter a major street stream. Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 6 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 7 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 8 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

Existing Operations Analysis: Traffic count data for existing operations was entered into Highway Capacity Software 2010 (HCS 2010) developed by the Center for Microcomputers in Transportation (McTrans) at the University of Florida. The HCS 2010 software is based on analytical procedures and methodologies contained in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010). Traffic count data was entered into HCS 2010 for two-way stop controlled intersections analysis based existing intersection geometry, Figure 2. The following HCS inputs were used in the intersection analysis: Volume from data Analysis Period 15 minutes Peak hour factor (PHF) 0.92 Hourly flow rate (HFR) (volume/phf for each approach) Percent heavy vehicles: (heavy vehicles / total volume x100 (per approach) Median type / storage divided / undivided Channelization yes/no Number of lanes and usage lanes per approach / shared? Upstream signals yes/no As performance measures, HCS 2010 outputs the approach volume in vehicles per hour (vph), the capacity in vehicles per hour (vph), the volume to capacity ratio (v/c), the queue length and control delay for each approach to the intersection. The analysis also outputs the approach delay in seconds (sec) and approach level of service (LOS). Results of Existing Operations Analysis The existing operations analysis indicates that the intersections at State Route 198 and Shirk Road are operating at acceptable levels of service for the AM peak hour. The eastbound intersection is operating at LOS C and the westbound intersection at LOS B. For the PM peak hour, the westbound intersection is operating at a LOS C, but the eastbound intersection is at an LOS F (demand exceeds capacity). The HCS 2010 analytical reports for the Existing Operations Analysis are provided in Appendix A. Signal Warrants Analysis The for the existing operations analysis, the westbound intersection at State Route 198 and Shirk Road was found to meet Warrant #3, the Peak Hour warrant, for both the AM and PM peak hour. However the eastbound intersection met Warrant #3 for only the PM peak hour; the warrant was not met for the AM peak hour (Table 3). Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 9 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

2035 Operations Analysis: The HCS inputs for the 2035 operations analysis were the same as those described above for existing conditions. Turning movement volumes for the AM and PM peak hours were determined by applying a 2% compounding growth factor to existing turn count volumes. The 2% growth factor is based on the assumption, that in a mostly rural area with minimal land use changes, traffic would not increase beyond this level for the foreseeable future. The future year turning count volumes and intersection geometrics are provided in Figure 3. Results of 2035 Operations Analysis The 2035 analysis indicates that the eastbound and westbound intersections at State Route 198 and Shirk Road are operating at LOS F, where demand exceeds capacity. In addition, the eastbound intersection was found to be suffering from extremely high delay times during the PM peak hour. A summary of the LOS analysis for existing and 2035 interchange operations is provided in Table 3. The HCS 2010 analytical reports for the 2035 operations analysis are provided in Appendix B. Signal Warrants Analysis: Based on projected traffic volumes, the intersections at State Route 198 and Shirk Road meet Warrant #3, the Peak Hour warrant for possible signalization for 2035 (Table 3). Intersections which meet warrant may benefit from signalization, but an engineering study should be performed to evaluate this and other options to improve LOS. Table 3 Shirk Road at State Route 198 Intersection Analysis AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Control Delay LOS Warrant Delay LOS Warrant Intersection Type (sec/veh) Met (sec/veh) Met Existing Conditions: Shirk Road/State Route 198 EB Ramps T 24.0 C N 201.0 F Y Shirk Road/State Route 198 WB Ramps T 14.9 B Y 17.3 C Y Future Conditions: Shirk Road/State Route 198 EB Ramps T 119.0 F Y 2795.0 F Y Shirk Road/State Route 198 WB Ramps T 57.4 F Y 132.3 F Y T=TWSC A=AWSC Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 10 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

Conclusions: Based on traffic count data collected during the study, it was determined that the eastbound SR 198 ramp intersection with Shirk Road is operating at failing LOS for the existing PM peak hour. The calculated delay time for this intersection is 201seconds/vehicle. In addition, the westbound and eastbound ramp intersections with Shirk Road are forecast to operate at failing LOS for the 2035 (future) year for both the AM and PM peak hours. The vehicle delay times for the 2035 intersection analysis ranged between 57 seconds/vehicle to over 2700 seconds/vehicle. Both intersections were found to meet the requirements of Warrant #3, the Peak Hour warrant, as described in CAMUTCD, with the exception of the eastbound ramp junction during the existing AM peak hour (see summary table above). The analysis indicates that the westbound and eastbound State Route 198 ramp junctions could benefit from possible signalization to improve LOS. Signalization could raise the LOS to C or better on the eastbound ramp junction for the existing PM peak hour and C or better for both the eastbound and westbound junctions for 2035 AM and PM peak hour conditions (see Appendix B). Recommendations: Based upon the findings of this report, it is recommended that the following be considered for the State Route 198 at Shirk Road interchange: Based on the foregoing analysis, staff s recommendation is for further monitoring of the State Route 198 at Shirk Road interchange followed with a detailed engineering report that fully assesses all options available for improving LOS and vehicle delay. Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 11 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

Appendix A Intersection Turning Movement Analysis Data Sheets Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 12 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 General Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information ~nalyst Marvin Demmers Shirk Rd. @ SR 198 EB Intersection Ramps ~gency/co. TCAG Jurisdiction City of Visalia/Caltrans Date Performed 111212012 ~nalysis Year 2012 ~nalysis Time Period lam Peak Hour Project Description Shirk Rd. @ SR 198/nterchange Analysis EasUWest Street: SR 198 North/South Street: Shirk Rd. Intersection Orientation: North-South!Study Period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Malor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 Volume (veh/h) 298 78 244 210 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 lrveh/h) 0 323 84 265 228 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 4 -- -- Median Type Undivided Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12!Volume (veh/h) 60 0 54 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 lrveh/h) 65 0 58 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 Configuration LT R Delay, Queue Length and Level of Service f.pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT R 1v (veh/h) 265 65 58 C (m) (veh/h) 1226 177 809!viC 0.22 0.37 0.07 95% queue length 0.82 1.57 0.23 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.7 36.7 9.8 LOS A E A f.pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 24.0 f.pproach LOS -- -- c Copyright 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ Version 5.6 Generated: 2/4/2013 10:00 AM file:///c:/users/mdemmers/appdata/local/temp/u2k3869.tmp 2/4/2013

Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 General Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information ~nalyst Marvin Demmers Shirk Rd. @ SR 19B EB Intersection Ramps Agency/Co. TCAG.lurisdiction City of Visalia/Caltrans Date Performed 111212012 nalysis Year 2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Shirk Rd. @ SR 19Binterchange Analysis EasUWest Street: SR 19B North/South Street: Shirk Rd. Intersection Orientation: Norlh-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~olume (veh/h) 222 34 376 20B Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 veh/h) 0 241 36 40B 226 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type Undivided Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R LT Upstream SiQnal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~olume (veh/h) 171 0 11B Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 veh/h) 1B5 0 12B 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 0 4 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 Configuration LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT R v (veh/h) 40B 1B5 12B C (m) (veh/h) 1331 122 BOB v/c 0.31 1.52 0.16 95% queue length 1.31 13.15 0.56 Control Delay (s/veh) B.9 334.1 10.3 LOS A F B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 201.7 Approach LOS -- -- F Copyright 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ Version 5.6 Generated: 2/4/2013 1 o:oo AM file:///c:/users/mdemmers/appdata/local/temp/u2kb056.tmp 2/4/2013

Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 General Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Analyst Marvin Demmers Shirk Rd. @ SR 198 WB Intersection Ramps Agency/Co. TCAG Jurisdiction City of Visalia/Caltrans Date Performed 111212012 Analysis Year 2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Shirk Rd.@ SR 198 Interchange Anal} sis East/West Street: SR 198 North/South Street: Shirk Rd. Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs : 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 Volume (veh/h) 130 267 444 169 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 veh/h) 141 290 0 0 482 183 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 4 -- -- Median Type Undivided Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume (veh/h) 38 0 261 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 veh/h) 0 0 0 41 0 283 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 2 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 1 Configuration LT R Delay, Queue Length and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT R v (veh/h) 141 41 283 C (m) (veh/h) 924 186 749 jv/c 0.15 0.22 0.38 95% queue length 0.54 0.81 1.77 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.6 29.7 12.7 LOS A D B!Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 14.9!Approach LOS -- -- B Copyright 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ Version 5.6 Generated: 214/2013 10:01 AM file:/ I /C :IU sers/mdemmers/ AppData!Local/T emp/u2k9bfb. tmp 2/4/2013

Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 General Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information!Analyst Marvin Demmers Shirk Rd. @ SR 198 WB Intersection Ramps jagency/co. TCAG [Jurisdiction City of Visalia/Caltrans Date Performed 111212012!Analysis Year 2012!Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Shirk Rd. @ SR 198/nterchange Anal~ysis East/West Street: SR 198 North/South Street: Shirk Rd. Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Wehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 Volume (veh/hl 79 291 581 107 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 veh/hl 85 316 0 0 631 116 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type Undivided Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume (veh/h) 61 0 175 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 veh/h) 0 0 0 66 0 190 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 0 4 1 0 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L TR v (veh/h) 85 66 190 C (m) (veh/h) 857 192 727 v/c 0.10 0.34 0.26 95% queue length 0.33 1.44 1.05 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 33.3 11.7 LOS A D 8 Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 17.3 f.pproach LOS -- -- c Copyright 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ Version 5.6 Generated: 214/2013 10:02 AM file:///c:/users/mdemmers/appdata/local/temp/u2k4e78.tmp 2/4/2013

Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 General Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information ~nalyst Marvin Demmers Shirk Rd. @ SR 198 EB Intersection Ramps ~ency/co. TCAG ~urisdiction City of Visalia!Caltrans Date Performed 111212012 ~nalysis Year 2035 ~nalysis Time Period ~M Peak Hour Project Description Shirk Rd. @ SR 198 Interchange Analysis East/West Street: SR 198 North/South Street: Shirk Rd. Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 Volume (veh/h) 470 123 385 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0 510 133 418 0 0 vehlhj Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- - 4 -- -- Median Type Undivided Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume (veh/h) 95 0 85 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 veh/h) 103 0 92 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 2 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 Configuration LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service lapp roach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT R tv (vehlh) 418 103 92 C (m) (vehlh) 1045 77 1082 tvtc 0.40 1.34 0.09 95% queue length 1.95 8.05 0.28 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.7 311.9 8.6 LOS 8 F A!Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 168.8!Approach LOS -- -- F Copyright 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ TM Version 5.6 Generated: 2/4/2013 10:03 AM file:/ //C:IU sers/mdemmers/ AppData/Local/Temp/u2k53B6. tmp 2/4/2013

Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 General Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Shirk Rd. @ SR 198 E8 ~ na l yst Marvin Demmers Intersection Ramps ~gency/co. TCAG blurisdiction City of Visalia/Caltrans Date Performed 111212012 ~nalys i s Year 2035!Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Shirk Rd. @ SR 198/nterchange Analysis EasUWest Street: SR 198 North/South Street: Shirk Rd. Intersection Orientation : North-South Study Period (hrs : 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 Volume (veh/h) 350 54 593 328 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1. 00 veh/h) 0 380 58 644 356 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type Undivided Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 rvolume (veh/h) 270 0 186 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 veh/h) 293 0 202 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 0 4 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 Configuration LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT R v (veh/h) 644 293 202 C (m) (veh/h) 1184 27 684 v/c 0.54 10.85 0.30 95% queue length 3.41 36.28 1.23 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.6 4714 12.5 LOS 8 F 8 Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 2795 Approach LOS -- -- F Copyright 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ Version 5.6 Generated: 2/4/2013 10:03 AM file:/ I /C:IU sers/mdemmers/ AppData/Local/Temp/u2kA992. tmp 2/4/2013

Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 General Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Analyst Marvin Demmers Shirk Rd. @ SR 198 WB Intersection Ramps Agency/Co. TCAG Jurisdiction City of Visalia/Caltrans Date Performed 111212012 Analysis Year 2035 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Shirk Rd.@ SR 198/nterchange Analysis East/West Street: SR 198 North/South Street: Shirk Rd. Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25!Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~olume (veh/h) 205 421 700 266 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 veh/h) 222 457 0 0 760 289 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 4 -- -- Median Type Undivided Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~olume (veh/h) 60 0 412 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 veh/h) 0 0 0 65 0 447 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 2 0 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 1 Configuration LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service fa.pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT R v (veh/h) 222 65 447 C (m) (veh/h) 663 58 604 v/c 0.33 1.12 0.74 95% queue length 1.47 5.39 6.43 Control Delay (s/veh) 13.1 273.2 26.0 LOS 8 F D Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 57.4 f.pproach LOS -- -- F Copyright 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ Version 5.6 Generated: 2/4/2013 10:04 AM file: ///C:/Users/MDemmers/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kF235.tmp 2/4/2013

Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 General Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Analyst Marvin Demmers Shirk Rd.@ SR 198 WB Intersection Ramps Agency/Co. TCAG.Jurisdiction City of Visalia!Caltrans Date Performed 111212012 nalysis Year 2035 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Prolect Description Shirk Rd. @ SR 198/nterchanqe Analysis East/West Street: SR 198 North/South Street: Shirk Rd. Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~olume (veh/h) 125 459 916 169 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 135 498 0 0 995 183 veh/h} Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type Undivided Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume (veh/h) 96 0 276 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 veh/h) 0 0 0 104 0 299 Percent Heavy Vehicles 4 0 4 1 0 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L TR v (veh/h) 135 104 299 C (m) (veh/h) 589 63 574!VIc 0.23 1.65 0.52 95% queue length 0.88 9.31 3.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.9 461.3 17.9 LOS 8 F c Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 132.3 Approach LOS -- -- F Copyright 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ TM Version 5.6 Generated: 2/4/2013 10:04 AM file:///c:/users/mdemmers/appdata/local!temp/u2k4d02.tmp 2/4/2013

Appendix B Intersection Signalization Analysis Data Sheets Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Study 13 K\Special Projects\Shirk SR 198 Interchange\Report Tulare County Association of Governments

HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary Copyright 2013 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 TM Streets Version 6.40 Generated: 2/4/2013 11:07:48 AM

HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary Copyright 2013 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 TM Streets Version 6.40 Generated: 2/4/2013 11:09:52 AM

HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary Copyright 2013 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 TM Streets Version 6.40 Generated: 2/4/2013 11 :10:24 AM

HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary Copyright 2013 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010"' Streets Version 6.40 Generated: 2/4/2013 11:11:02 AM

HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary Copyright 2013 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010 TM Streets Version 6.40 Generated: 2/4/201311:11 :34AM