Solar Plus: A Holistic Approach to Distributed Solar PV Eric O'Shaughnessy, Kristen Ardani, Dylan Cutler, Robert Margolis

Similar documents
Solar PV and Storage Overview

Market Drivers for Battery Storage

Rate Impact of Net Metering. Jason Keyes & Joseph Wiedman Interstate Renewable Energy Council April 6, 2010

What, Why, and Where? Brian Lips Senior Project Manager for Policy NC Clean Energy Technology Center

Virtual Power Plants Realising the value of distributed storage systems through and aggregation and integration

The impact of electric vehicle development on peak demand and the load curve under different scenarios of EV integration and recharging options

Economics of Integrating Renewables DAN HARMS MANAGER OF RATE, TECHNOLOGY & ENERGY POLICY SEPTEMBER 2017

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S (U 338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION

2016 UC Solar Research Symposium

Alternatives to Utility-scale Renewable Energy in the Desert. Basin & Range Watch

Demand Charges to Deal With Net Energy Metering: Key Considerations

Update on State Solar Net Metering Activities Lori Bird, NREL RPS Collaborative Summit Washington, DC September 23, 2014

Illinois Solar Energy Association. Residential Rate Design Webinar August 25, 2016

BROCHURE. End-to-end microgrid solutions From consulting and advisory services to design and implementation

Analysis of Impact of Mass Implementation of DER. Richard Fowler Adam Toth, PE Jeff Mueller, PE

Demand Charges: A Less Equitable and Less Effective Rate Design Than TOU Energy Rates. Jim Lazar Senior Advisor The Regulatory Assistance Project

Topic Small Projects (< 100 kw) Large Projects (>100 kw)

Advanced Rate Design. Smart Electric Power Alliance Grid Evolution Summit. David Littell Principal The Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP)

Technical and Economic Assessment of Solar Photovoltaic and Energy Storage Options for Zero Energy Residential Buildings

40KW Solar System for Apple Sauce Co

Advances in Energy Storage and Implementing a Peak Shaving Battery at Fort Carson

Zero Emission Bus Impact on Infrastructure

Overview of Net Energy Metering (NEM) Successor Tariff (NEM 2.0)

Making electricity billing fair

Presented by Eric Englert Puget Sound Energy September 11, 2002

PDR Energy Baseline Alternative. Proposal for Discussion October 27, 2015

The International Cost Estimating and Analysis Association (ICEAA) Southern California Chapter September 9, 2015

Executive Summary: U.S. Residential Solar Economic Outlook :

Guideline on Energy Storage

SolarPACE + Storage Expanding Opportunities and Improving Project Economics. Presented By:

Utility-Scale Storage in High-RE Power Systems

Grid Energy Storage: Policies

Statewide Joint IOU Study of Permanent Load Shifting Workshop #2: Expanding the Availability of Permanent Load Shifting in California

Facilitated Discussion on the Future of the Power Grid

ALBERTA SOLAR MARKET OUTLOOK. CanSIA Solar West 10 May 2017

Evaluating Batteries: Deployment, Integration and Market Drivers

Measured Performance of a High-Efficiency Solar-Assisted Heat Pump Water Heater

Australian Solar Cooling Interest Group (ausscig) Conference Queensland Solar City

Net Metering in Illinois. Eric P. Schlaf Senior Economic Analyst Illinois Commerce Commission January 31, 2014

Demand and Time of Use Rates. Marty Blake The Prime Group LLC

Beyond Net Metering Issues for Washington State

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT E-27 CUSTOMER GENERATION PRICE PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL SERVICE

Smart Rate Design for a Smart Future

2018 Load & Capacity Data Report

The Electrification Futures Study: Transportation Electrification

Planning for Renewables

Operational Opportunities to Minimize Renewables Curtailments

2019 NYC Solar Installer Workshop: Solar and Storage. March 18, 2019

2018 Customer generation rates

USAID Distributed PV Building Blocks

Customers with solar PV units in NSW producing and consuming electricity

Solar Power, NEM and Challenges to the Traditional Utility Model. Carrie Cullen Hitt SVP, State Affairs

ARISEIA Energy Forum APS Residential Rate Design

Energy Produced by PV Array (AC):

Impact of Distributed Energy-Efficiency with Solar on SMUD s Peak Load

This presentation was given as part of a workshop on February 7, Presenters were:

Designing Distributed Generation Tariffs Well

Meter Insights for Downtown Store

Solar + Storage: How to Develop & Sell High Value Projects September 7, 2016

Case study: Grid parity analysis of a PV- BESS hybrid By D Kanetey-Essel and M Moghul, juwi Renewable Energies

Thomas Alston Director of Business and Policy Development. Presented By N. Scottsdale Rd, Suite 410 Scottsdale Arizona 85257

SDG&E Customer Distributed Generation Programs. Steve Jaffe Senior Market Advisor Customer Innovations Group September 14, 2009

Montana Renewable Energy Association

Cutting Demand Charges with Battery Storage. June 5, 2018

RESNET San Diego, California February 24, 2003

Economics and Barriers to Solar Photovoltaic Applications in Barbados

Time of Use Rates. The Policy, Economics, Physics

SDG&E Electric Vehicle activities

Electric Vehicle Grid Integration Research Analyzing PHEV Impacts on Distribution Transformers in Hawaii

Irrigation energy efficiency How to analyse your energy costs. Nick Bullock The Energy Guys

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT E-21 PRICE PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL SUPER PEAK TIME-OF-USE SERVICE

The Solar Trifecta: A Path to Smart Utility-Scale Solar. October 2017

Transmission Access Charges (TAC) Structure Use Transmission Energy Downflow (TED) as the TAC Billing Determinant

This presentation was given as part of a workshop on November 14, Presenters were:

Stationary Energy Storage Solutions 3. Stationary Energy Storage Solutions

Virtual Net Metering. Scott Benson 12/01/2016

Solar*Rewards Frequently asked questions system size and customer usage

DEVELOPING TALENT GROWING VENTURES OPENING MARKETS. CCRE Policy Forum. Paul Murphy, Nov 24, Our Future Matters

Volume II: Summer 2012

Distributed Storage Systems

NJ Solar Market Update As of 6/30/15

To Shift or not to Shift?

Sustainable Infrastructure and South Mountain Village: Building Energy Use

Reforming the TAC and Retail Transmission Rates. Robert Levin California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division August 29, 2017

A deep dive into behind-the-meter battery storage economics: PG&E territory in California

ELG 4126 DGD Sustainable Electrical Power Systems

Your electricity bill

Regulated Price Plan (RPP) - Tiered Prices Prices effective May 1, 2011 (per kwh)

New Business Models for Distribution Network Operators

Net Metering in the world

Example 1MW Solar System for Fosters Yatala

Please Refer to Attached Sample Form

SOLAR SHARES BUSINESS MODEL

Transforming New York s Electricity System with the Marcus Garvey Village Microgrid. Philip Martin DER Business Development Enel X North America

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

OPTIMIZING THE ACQUISITION AND OPERATION OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION SYSTEMS

Technical Conference: Alternative Utility Cost Recovery Mechanisms

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Inergy Systems - Home Energy Management Systems Demand and Distributed Resource Management

CUSTOMER OWNED SOLAR IN WISCONSIN

Transcription:

Solar Plus: A Holistic Approach to Distributed Solar PV Eric O'Shaughnessy, Kristen Ardani, Dylan Cutler, Robert Margolis NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

2 Solar Plus Solar plus refers to an emerging approach to distributed solar photovoltaic (PV) deployment that uses energy storage and controllable devices to optimize customer economics.

Introduction

Maintaining PV Value as Rates Evolve Net metering addresses the temporal mismatch between PV output and customer load by compensating excess output But lower net metering rates and other rate reforms could reduce the value of PV under net metering programs Solar plus could mitigate PV value loss by providing a technical solution to the mismatch between PV output and customer load 4

5 Solar Plus Technologies Solar plus increases customer system value through technologies such as electric batteries, smart domestic water heaters, smart air conditioner (AC) units, and electric vehicles (EVs).

How Does Solar Plus Work? Solar plus optimizes customer economics through load shifting. Solar plus technologies shift customer loads under the PV output curve, reducing grid electricity use. In time-of-use (TOU) rate structures, solar plus technologies can also shift grid electricity use from high-rate to low-rate periods. Figure note: Grid net load refers to customer load at the meter, the net sum of customer load and PV output. Negative grid net load reflects PV exports to the grid. 6

7 Traditional Water Heating Typical electric water heaters heat water after each hot water draw to keep water around a target temperature (e.g., 125 F)

8 Smart Water Heating The smart domestic water heat controls how and when the unit heats water. The unit uses PV output to pre-heat water to 180 F. After PV is no longer available, the unit allows water temperature to drift down to 120 F without using grid electricity to heat water.

9 Traditional AC A traditional AC unit maintains home temperature within some deadband (e.g., 70 F-72 F). The AC unit turns on each time the home s temperature reaches the upper end of the deadband.

10 Smart AC The smart AC unit controls how and when the AC unit cools the home. The AC unit uses PV output to pre-cool the home to 66 F. The AC unit then allows the home s temperature to drift up to 74 F without using grid electricity.

Methods

NREL REopt Model We use NREL s Renewable Energy Optimization (REopt) tool to model the economics of solar plus. For more information about REopt visit: http://www.nrel.gov/tech_deployment/tools_ reopt.html. 12

13 Candidate Technologies REopt deploys optimal combinations of PV, a battery, and smart load control to optimize customer economics based on customer bill savings. Many other technologies, such as EVs, can serve as solar plus technologies. With EVs, customers could schedule vehicle charging to coincide with peak PV output. However, EV ownership is currently low in the United States, and EVs are not a solar plus option in our analysis.

14 Modeled Home Customer loads are modeled using NREL s Building Energy Optimization model and typical meteorological year data. The modeled home is a 199-m 2 house with 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, and 1.5 stories. More complete technical assumptions are available in the full report.

Scenarios Standalone Solar REopt is limited to deploying only a PV system and determines an optimal PV system size. Solar Plus REopt determines an optimal configuration of PV, battery, smart AC, and smart domestic water heater. 15

Sensitivity Analysis

17 Sensitivity Analysis To model the economics of solar plus under different rate structures, we allow certain rate parameters to vary while holding all other factors constant. We use REopt to determine optimal combinations of solar plus technologies under different rate assumptions We estimate the system s net present value (NPV) of the system at each rate assumption o NPV is calculated relative to what the customer would pay without a PV system See technical report for all techno-economic assumptions.

18 Rate Parameters Flat rates: Customers pay a constant flat volumetric rate ($/kwh). TOU rates: Customers pay time-varying volumetric rates ($/kwh). The TOU delta refers to the difference between the peak and off-peak rates. Net metering rates: Customers are compensated ($/kwh) for excess PV output delivered to the grid. Demand charges: Fees are assessed based on peak demand ($/kw) during some period. See technical report for all assumptions.

19 Varying Flat Rates Solar plus results in larger PV systems at low flat rates Incremental value is higher at higher flat rates The Economics of Solar Plus Under Different Flat Rates Assumptions: Net metering rate is half of flat rate at every step. REopt deploys the smart AC unit and smart domestic water heater at all flat rates, but it does not deploy a battery under our assumptions

20 Flat Rates: Varying Net Metering Rates Incremental value is higher at lower net metering rates Solar plus results in larger PV systems at low net metering rates The Economics of Solar Plus Under Different Net Metering Rates Assumptions: Flat rate of $0.22/kWh. REopt deploys the smart AC unit and smart domestic water heater at all net metering rates, but it does not deploy a battery.

TOU Rates: Varying TOU Deltas Incremental value is higher at higher TOU deltas The Economics of Solar Plus Under Different TOU Deltas Assumptions: Off-peak rate is $0.08/kWh, net metering rate is $0.03/kWh, peak period is 4pm-9pm. REopt deploys the smart AC unit and smart domestic water heater at all TOU deltas (differences between peak and off-peak rates), and it deploys a battery at TOU deltas above $0.26/kWh 21

TOU Rates: Varying Peak Period Timing Incremental value is higher for later peak periods Solar plus results in smaller PV systems for earlier peak periods, but larger systems for later peak periods The Economics of Solar Plus with TOU Rates and Different Peak Rate Periods Each point on x-axis represents beginning of a 5-hour peak rate period. Assumptions: Off-peak rate of $0.08/kWh, on-peak rate of $0.22/kWh, net metering rate of $0.03/kWh. REopt deploys the smart AC unit and smart domestic water heater, but no battery, under all peak rate periods. 22

23 Flat Rates: Varying Demand Charges Incremental value increases with demand charge Solar plus results in larger PV systems at higher demand charges The Economics of Solar Plus Under Different Demand Charges Assumptions: Flat rate of $0.06/kWh, net metering rate $0.03/kWh. REopt deploys a smart AC unit and smart domestic water heater at all demand charges, and it deploys a battery for demand charges above $16/kW

24 Sensitivity Analysis Summary Solar plus improves system value under all rate structures with less-than-retail rate net metering.* The incremental value of solar plus is greater for customers with: o High flat rates o Low net metering rates o High TOU peak rates o Peak rate periods that do not coincide with PV output o High demand charges * Solar plus also improves system value with full retail rate net metering for customers with TOU rate structures or demand charges.

25 Sensitivity Analysis Summary The incremental benefits of solar plus are higher for rate designs that are generally less favorable for PV economics: Demand charges Low net metering rates Late TOU peak periods (non-coincident with solar) The results suggest that solar plus may mitigate some of the negative impacts of certain rate designs on PV economics.

Case Studies

Hawaii Self-Supply Rate In late 2015, the Hawaii PUC effectively ended net metering with the approval of a selfsupply rate. Case study based on a home in Honolulu. RATES ($/kwh) Peak: $0.35 Off-peak: $0.22 Midday $0.13 TOU PERIODS Peak: 5pm-10pm Off-peak: 10pm-9am Midday: 9am-5pm NET METERING None Abbreviations used in the following figures: AC = air-conditioner load, BESS = battery energy storage load (system charging), DHW = domestic hot water load, Misc = miscellaneous customer load (other than AC and DHW). 27

28 Results: Hawaii System Deployments Standalone Solar Solar Plus PV 4.6 kw PV 8 kw Smart DHW Deployed Smart AC Deployed Battery 7.8 kwh System NPVs Standalone Solar Solar Plus $5,684 $16,851

Results: Hawaii Hawaii PV and Customer Load Profiles under Standalone Solar and Solar Plus Approaches (based on week in August) TOU peak periods depicted by shaded columns 29

Nevada Declining Net Metering Following a 2015 ruling, net metering is scheduled to decline from $0.092/kWh in 2016 to $0.026/kWh in 2028. Case study based on a home in Las Vegas. RATES Volumetric: $0.106/kWh Service charge: $29.23/mo TOU PERIODS None (flat rate) NET METERING $0.055/kWh 30

31 Results: Nevada System Deployments Standalone Solar Solar Plus PV 3.5 kw PV 4.3 kw Smart DHW Deployed Smart AC Deployed Battery - System NPVs Standalone Solar Solar Plus $1,117 $1,984

Results: Nevada Nevada PV and Customer Load Profiles under Standalone Solar and Solar Plus Approaches (based on week in July) 32

California TOU Rates In 2016, California amended its net metering rules to require PV customers to participate in TOU rates. Case study based on a home in San Francisco. RATES ($/kwh) Summer (Jun-Sep) Peak: $0.36 Off-peak: $0.26 TOU PERIODS Peak: 4pm-9pm NET METERING Follows TOU structure Winter (Oct-May) Peak: $0.22 Off-peak: $0.20 33

34 Results: California System Deployments Standalone Solar Solar Plus PV 6.5 kw PV 6.5 kw Smart DHW Deployed Smart AC - Battery - System NPVs Standalone Solar Solar Plus $19,386 $20,637

Results: California California PV and Customer Load Profiles under Standalone Solar and Solar Plus Approaches (based on week in July August) TOU peak periods depicted by shaded columns 35

Arizona Super Peak The super peak is designed to incentivize customers to reduce electricity use during the peak hours of the summer months. Case study based on a home in Phoenix. RATES ($/kwh) Off-peak: $0.06 Nov-Apr Peak: $0.20 TOU PERIODS Peak: 12pm-7pm Super peak: 3pm-6pm NET METERING $0.03/kWh May-Oct Peak: $0.24 Super peak: $0.47* * Applies Jun-Aug 36

37 Results: Arizona Super Peak System Deployments Standalone Solar Solar Plus PV 4.9 kw PV 4.2 kw Smart DHW Deployed Smart AC Deployed Battery - System NPVs Standalone Solar Solar Plus $5,968 $9,565

Results: Arizona Super Peak Arizona Super Peak PV and Customer Load Profiles under Standalone Solar and Solar Plus Approaches (based on week in July) TOU peak period depicted by light shaded columns, super peak by dark column 38

Arizona Demand Tariff Assesses a demand charge based on maximum demand during peak hours (12pm-7pm). Case study based on a home in Phoenix. RATES Off-peak: $0.04/kWh TOU PERIODS Peak: 12pm-7pm NET METERING $0.03/kWh Nov-Apr Peak: $0.06/kWh Demand: $9.30/kW May-Oct Peak: $0.09/kWh Demand: $13.50/kW 39

40 Results: Arizona Demand Tariff System Deployments Standalone Solar Solar Plus PV 2.7 kw PV 2.6 kw Smart DHW Deployed Smart AC Deployed Battery 0.3 kwh System NPVs Standalone Solar Solar Plus $750 $6,651

Results: Arizona Demand Tariff Arizona Demand Tariff PV and Customer Load Profiles under Standalone Solar and Solar Plus Approaches (based on week in July) TOU peak periods depicted by shaded columns 41

Summary

Summary Solar plus increases PV system value through increased solar self-use and grid arbitrage (in TOU rate structures). Solar plus may mitigate some of the negative economic impacts of certain rate structures such as low net metering rates, TOU rates where the peak period is non-coincident with PV output, and demand charges. 43

Future work Incorporate other technologies: EVs, controllable refrigeration, other controllable appliances, controllable heating. Model solar plus under new rate structures. Incorporate additional value streams such as grid-outage resiliency and grid-level ancillary services. 44

Full report is available at: [final link] eric.oshaughnessy@nrel.gov 303-275-4904