Human Exploration of the Lunar Surface

Similar documents
Lunar Architecture and LRO

Next Steps in Human Exploration: Cislunar Systems and Architectures

Lunar Surface Access from Earth-Moon L1/L2 A novel lander design and study of alternative solutions

From MARS To MOON. V. Giorgio Director of Italian Programs. Sorrento, October, All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space

lights on, down 2 ½ 40 feet, down 2 ½ Kickin up some dust 30 feet, 2 ½ down faint shadow

Solar Electric Propulsion Benefits for NASA and On-Orbit Satellite Servicing

Exploration Architecture Update

On Orbit Refueling: Supporting a Robust Cislunar Space Economy

European Lunar Lander: System Engineering Approach

The European Lunar Lander Mission

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION LAVOCHKIN ASSOCIATION PROGRAM OF THE MOON EXPLORATION BY AUTOMATIC SPACE COMPLEXES

OMOTENASHI. (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor)

Suitability of reusability for a Lunar re-supply system

The Role of Electric Propulsion in a Flexible Architecture for Space Exploration

NEXT Exploration Science and Technology Mission. Relevance for Lunar Exploration

Massachusetts Space Grant Consortium

NASA Glenn Research Center Intelligent Power System Control Development for Deep Space Exploration

Lunar Missions by Year - All Countries. Mission count dropped as we transitioned from politically driven missions to science driven missions

High Power Solar Electric Propulsion for Human Space Exploration Architectures

Moon Exploration Lunar Polar Sample Return ESA Thematic information day BELSPO, 3 July 2012

IAC-10-A5.1.6 A POWER ARCHITECTURE FOR THE ISECG REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE FOR HUMAN LUNAR EXPLORATION. M. Haese ESA, The Netherlands,

ReachMars 2024 A Candidate Large-Scale Technology Demonstration Mission as a Precursor to Human Mars Exploration

SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM. Steve Creech Manager Spacecraft/Payload Integration & Evolution August 29, 2017 A NEW CAPABILITY FOR DISCOVERY

A LEO Propellant Depot System Concept for Outgoing Exploration

The Intermediate Outpost - An Alternate Concept for Human Lunar Exploration

Future NASA Power Technologies for Space and Aero Propulsion Applications. Presented to. Workshop on Reforming Electrical Energy Systems Curriculum

Extending NASA s Exploration Systems Architecture towards Longterm Crewed Moon and Mars Operations

LUNAR DAYLIGHT EXPLORATION Cost Constrained Human and Robotic Exploration Brand Norman Griffin 1 A.M., ASCE

IAC-07- A3.I.A.19 A VALUE PROPOSITION FOR LUNAR ARCHITECTURES UTILIZING PROPELLANT RE-SUPPLY CAPABILITIES

Space Architecture. Master s Thesis Project Jain, Abhishek Dec. 2 nd, 2013

Industrial-and-Research Lunar Base

Analysis of Power Storage Media for the Exploration of the Moon

Building an Economical and Sustainable Lunar Infrastructure To Enable Lunar Science and Space Commerce

Planetary Surface Transportation and Site Development

NASA Perspectives on the Importance of Reform in Electric Energy Systems Education

CHANGING ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING PARADIGMS FOR HUMAN MARS LANDER

MARS-OZ: A Design for a Simulated Mars Base in the Arkaroola Region

Lunar Cargo Capability with VASIMR Propulsion

BIMODAL NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKET (BNTR) PROPULSION FOR FUTURE HUMAN MARS EXPLORATION MISSIONS

BIMODAL NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKET (BNTR) PROPULSION FOR FUTURE HUMAN MARS EXPLORATION MISSIONS

Mars Surface Mobility Proposal

Utilizing Lunar Architecture Transportation Elements for Mars Exploration

Martin J. L. Turner. Expedition Mars. Published in association with. Chichester, UK

Lunar Science and Infrastructure with the Future Lunar Lander

ASTRIUM. Lunar Lander Concept for LIFE. Hansjürgen Günther TOB 11. Bremen, 23/

Architecture Options for Propellant Resupply of Lunar Exploration Elements

Analysis of Architectures for Long-Range Crewed Moon and Mars Surface Mobility

Name: Space Exploration PBL

Notes: GENERAL DYNAMICS EARLY LUNAR ACCESS [1993]

Long-Range Rovers for Mars Exploration and Sample Return

WHAT WE WILL DISCUSS IN THIS VIDEO

Cooperative EVA/Telerobotic Surface Operations in Support of Exploration Science

Affordable Exploration Architectures Using the Space Launch System and High Power Solar Electric Propulsion

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

MARTIAN HABITAT DESIGN

LLO LLO. = Commercial Missions. = = NASA Commercial Missions. = Military Missions. = Military = NASA Missions LEO LEO. Cargo / (to 2013) (U/PLC)

Landing Targets and Technical Subjects for SELENE-2

IN DECEMBER 2006, NASA published their initial plan [1] for a

Abstract. 1 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

The Common Spacecraft Bus and Lunar Commercialization

Lunette: A Global Network of Small Lunar Landers

Lunar and Mars Mission Analysis and Design Using Commercial Launch Systems and the International Space Station

Ares V: Supporting Space Exploration from LEO to Beyond

ULA Briefing to National Research Council. In-Space Propulsion Roadmap. March 22, Bernard Kutter. Manager Advanced Programs. File no.

Design of Power Systems for Extensible Surface Mobility Systems on the Moon and Mars

Light-Lift Rocket II

3 DESIGN. 3.1 Chassis and Locomotion

Station for Exploratory Analysis and Research Center for Humanity (SEARCH)

Two Related Primary Challenges for Successful Renewed Lunar Exploration

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A LUNAR IN-SITU RESOURCE UTILIZATION (ISRU) PROPELLANT SERVICES MARKET:

WhirliGig Transfer Vehicle for motor-driven, restartable A.G. Tom Sullivan June, 2002

Lunar Robotics. Dr. Rob Ambrose, NASA JSC December Dr. Robert O. Ambrose

A New Facility for Lander Touchdown and Rover Mobility Testing at DLR

Artemis: A Reusable Excursion Vehicle Concept for Lunar Exploration

INTERNATIONAL LUNAR NETWORK ANCHOR NODES AND ROBOTIC LUNAR LANDER PROJECT UPDATE

Adrestia. A mission for humanity, designed in Delft. Challenge the future

Affordable Human Moon and Mars Exploration through Hardware Commonality

Sample Fetching Rover - Lightweight Rover Concepts for Mars Sample Return

On the feasibility of a fast track return to Mars

Europa Lander Mission Overview and Update

Mars 2018 Mission Status and Sample Acquisition Issues

An Overview of CSA s s Space Robotics Activities

Challenges of Designing the MarsNEXT Network

Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) Benefits for Near Term Space Exploration

Christopher Cannon, Chief Sustainability Officer Port of Los Angeles AAPA Environmental Committee Meeting November 14/15, 2017

Fly Me To The Moon On An SLS Block II

VACCO ChEMS Micro Propulsion Systems Advances and Experience in CubeSat Propulsion System Technologies

Abstract #1756. English. French. Author(s) and Co Author(s) ispace & Team Hakuto s 2017 Lunar Mission

Comparison of Orbit Transfer Vehicle Concepts Utilizing Mid-Term Power and Propulsion Options

TOWARDS A HEAVY LAUNCHER - PROPULSION SOLUTIONS - A. Souchier - C. Rothmund Snecma Moteurs, Direction Grosse Propulsion à Liquides

Canadian Lunar & Planetary Rover. Development

Silicon-Germanium Integrated Electronics for Extreme Environments Applied to the Design of a Lunar Hopper

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

NASA s Choice to Resupply the Space Station

Martian In Situ Investigations

Solar Electric Propulsion: Introduction, Applications and Status

Parametric Design MARYLAND

Initial Concept Review Team Alpha ALUM Rover (Astronaut Lunar Utility Mobile Rover) Friday, October 30, GMT

Phoenix Lander Implications on in situ resource utilization for robotic exploration of Mars

SABRE FOR HYPERSONIC & SPACE ACCESS PLATFORMS

Transcription:

International Space Exploration Coordination Group Human Exploration of the Lunar Surface International Architecture Working Group Future In-Space Operations Telecon September 20, 2017

Icon indicates first use opportunity. Commercial/Institutional launchers not shown. Human Exploration in Cislunar Space The Mission Scenario chart from GER2 notionally connects the Gateway (labeled as the Evolvable Deep Space Habitat) and the lunar surface scenarios together. Thus the IAWG sought to address the question: How would the Gateway be used to support human lunar surface missions? Potential functions for the Gateway in a lunar surface scenario include: 1 Storage and refueling of a reusable ascent module 2 Safe haven for crew aborting from the surface 3 Communications relay to Earth from the lunar far side 4 Teleoperations of robotic systems (on the far side) 5 Access to medical and exercise equipment for reconditioning. 6 Act as a hub for refueling spacecraft consumables. ISECG&Mission&Scenario& Low-Earth Orbit International Space Station Beyond Low-Earth Orbit Test Missions Rosetta Hayabusa-2 OSIRIS-REx (Sample Return) (Sample Return) Near-Earth Objects Lunar Vicinity LADEE Luna 25 Luna 26 Luna 27 RESOLVE SELENE-2 Moon MAVEN ISRO Mars Orbiter Mission Mars Multi-Destination Transportation Capabilities (Planned and Conceptual) Chandrayaan-2 ExoMars 2016 InSight Orion & SLS ExoMars 2018 Russian Piloted System 2020 2030 Asteroid Redirection Advanced Electric Propulsion Luna 28/29 (Sample Return) Apophis Extended Duration Crew Missions Mars JAXA 2020 Mars Precursor Evolvable Deep Space Habitat Commercial or Government-Owned Platforms SELENE-3 Explore Near Earth Asteroid Human-Assisted Sample Return Human-Assisted Sample Return Orion & SLS (Upgrade) Initial Cargo Delivery Small Cargo Lander Human Surface Mobility Crewed Lunar Lander Staging Post for Crew to Lunar Surface Potential Commercial Opportunities Humans to Lunar Surface Potential Commercial Opportunities Mars Sample Return Mission Opportunities Human Scale EDL Test Mission Opportunities Orion & SLS (Upgrade) Robotic Mission Human Mission Cargo Mission Sustainable Human Missions to the Mars System 2/16

ISECG Principles The GER has identified 6 exploration principles that are helpful metrics for devising a comprehensive architecture: 3/16

Architecture Driven by ISECG Principles The combined principles could be summarized as an endeavor to maximize partnership opportunities by prioritizing modular systems while at the same time minimizing cost and complexity, ultimately favoring minimum mass solutions. 1 GER derived strategic principles! A ordability, Exploration Value, International Partnerships, Capability Evolution, Human-Robotic Partnership 2 GER derived goals and objectives! 5 missions, 4 crew and 28+ days on surface 3 Capability based constraints as framed by international participants.! Currently featuring ESA, CSA, JAXA and NASA contributions 4/16

Cislunar Orbit Options While,the preferred orbit from a lander standpoint would be LLO, NASA s Orion doesn t have enough fuel to get in and out. Reduced round-trip times on the order of 85% to 95% to the surface from the NRHO compared to DRO or larger L2 Halos directly correlates to decrease in the mass of supplies, air and associated systems that in turn result in a multiplied increase in lander propellant mass. 5/16

Final Trade Space Acompletelymobilebasedsystemwasselectedasthepreferredimplementation for the crewed stays. Two pressurized rovers provide full habitation for 2 crew members each for 42 days (2 lunar days + 1 lunar night). Amobilesystem maximizes landing site diversity while simultaenously minimizing surface infrastructure. 6/16

Design Reference Mission Initial 3Launchscenario. Subsequent missions require 1.5 launches. 7/16

Two Stage Lander Reusable Ascent Module Main function: deliver 4 crew safely to the lunar surface and back. 3-4 day lifetime capability required for abort modes Reduced pressurized volume to 10 m 3 to save mass Pump-fed storable fuel-based engines LO 2 /CH 4 Descent Module LO 2 /CH 4 was selected for the descent module for ISRU potential and increased performance Key features of descent module given below: Item Descent Module Main Propellants LO 2 /CH 4 # Engines 3 Engine Thrust >80 kn Engine I sp 370 s RCS 40 x 220 N Power Solar Panels 8/16

Reusable Surface Rovers Small Pressurized Rovers 2reusableroverscarry2crew members each Yearly missions will require small cargo resupply Volumetric challenge to fit 2 rovers atop a descent module in launch vehicle shroud The rover has 4 main systems: 1 The rover platform/chassis 2 The radioisotope power/thermal source 3 The airlock 4 The pressurized module Unique hybrid power system includes: 1 Partially deployable solar panels 2 Multiple radioisotope power systems 3 Rechargeable batteries or regenerative fuel cells. Notional Rover Design Notional Launch Configuration 9/16

Element Co-Development Envisioned co-development approach Aprogrammaticanalysiswas performed on how to realize a lunar surface architecture. The time scale on the top of the figure indicates years to Human Lunar Return. Relationship between demonstrator and human elements The study found that: 1 Asub-scalerobotic demonstrator version of the human lunar lander is the most a ordable solution 2 System components would be implemented based on the partnership roles in the human architecture 3 Demonstrator mission should be between 4 and 6 years before human lunar return 4 Ademonstratordoesnot significantly delay human lunar return. 10 / 16

Key Technology Challenges Radioisotope-Solar Hybrid Power (Lunar Night survival) Life support and EVA for extended lunar stay (LSS atmosphere choices, dust mitigation, radiation, exercise requirements) Zero-boil-o LO 2 /CH 4 propulsion 11 / 16

Landing Sites to Connect 5 Consecutive Missions Notional Sites in SPAB Coordinates of Notional Sites # Site Lon. Lat. 1 Malapert Massif 0-85 2 Shackleton Plateau 126-89 3 Schrödinger Basin 139-75 4 Antoniadi 172-70 5 SPAB Interior 160-60 Detailed Example SPAB Landing Site Theme Geological Features Water or Ice Observation Objective Geological Exploration as wide area of SPAB Lunar Water/Ice or Volatile component exploration for ISRU Moonquake observation. Astronomical Observatory on lunar surface. The five example SPAB sites are useful for addressing the feasibility of the architecture concept driving power, thermal, and communication subsystem designs, as well as the assumptions on the terrain environment for surface landing and mobility. 12 / 16

Crew Concept of Operations 13 / 16

Sub-Scale Demonstrator Mission Aconceptforthedemonstratormissionscenariohasbeenadvancedto phase-0 level by the participating agencies CSA, ESA, and JAXA Once landed, surface rover is envisioned to collect up to 15 kg of samples from previously unexplored regions of the Moon. The first operational concept will allow significant advances in preparing for human missions to Mars and sustained exploration of the Moon While reliance on ISRU has been excluded for the DRM, it is nevertheless an objective of the campaign to deploy a to-be-defined ISRU pilot plant 14 / 16

Gateway Enabled Human Surface Summary Lunar surface concept is logical combination of: Planned components (SLS and Orion) + Conceptual Components (Human Lander and Pressurized Rovers) Key is a ordability: minimizing heavy lift launches, maximize reusability and minimize new developments Approval of the demonstrator mission for development is vital to make human lander project a ordable. 15 / 16

http://www.globalspaceexploration.org 16 / 16