Two Companies Joined to Develop a Catalytic Solution for Bottoms Upgrading to Diesel in the FCC Unit

Similar documents
Recycle and Catalytic Strategies for Maximum FCC Light Cycle Oil Operations

Petroleum Refining Fourth Year Dr.Aysar T. Jarullah

Testing Catalyst Additives for Sulfur Reduction in Cat-Naphtha

Strategies for Maximizing FCC Light Cycle Oil

Boron-Based Technology: An Innovative Solution for Resid FCC Unit Performance Improvement

Grace Davison s GENESIS Catalyst Systems Provide Refiners the Flexibility to Capture Economic Opportunities

TechnipFMC RFCC Technology converts bunker fuels into high value products for African refiners

The GENESIS TM Catalyst System

Maximizing FCC Light Cycle Oil Operating Strategies Introducing MIDAS -300 Catalyst for Increased Selectivity

Resid fluid catalytic cracking catalyst selection

Modernizing a Vintage Cat Cracker. Don Leigh HFC Rahul Pillai KBR Steve Tragesser KBR

Strategies for Metals Management in Resid FCC Units ERTC. November Dr. Vasilis Komvokis, Technology Manager

Co-Processing of Green Crude in Existing Petroleum Refineries. Algae Biomass Summit 1 October

Utilizing the Flexibility of FCC Additives for Shale Oil Processing. Todd Hochheiser Senior Technical Service Engineer, Johnson Matthey

Technip Stone & Webster Process Technology Offering in Refining

An Innovative New Technology Platform for FCC Distillate Maximization

Mike Hurley Galveston, TX May 2012

EST technology: an advanced way to upgrade the bottom of the barrel G. Rispoli

Balancing the Need for Low Sulfur FCC Products and Increasing FCC LCO Yields by Applying Advanced Technology for Cat Feed Hydrotreating

Solvent Deasphalting Conversion Enabler

Case Studies Using Grace Resid FCC Catalysts W. R. Grace & Co.

New Residue Up-grading Complex at European Refinery Achieves Euro 5 Specifications

ACHIEVE. In this issue: Processing Tight Oils in FCC: Issues, Opportunities and Flexible Catalytic Solutions

CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY 2-1 TECHNICAL ASPECTS 2-1 ECONOMIC ASPECTS 2-2

GSR Products Maintain Excellent Performance When Used with Olefins Additives

Eni Slurry Technology:

GULFTRONIC SEPARATOR SYSTEMS

Effect of Feedstock Properties on Conversion and Yields

Production of Transportation Fuels by Co-processing Biomass-Derived Pyrolysis Oils in a Petroleum Refinery Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit

LCO Processing Solutions. Antoine Fournier

Rive Molecular Highway TM Catalyst Delivers Over $2.50/bbl Uplift at Alon s Big Spring, AM-13-03

LLANO NOGALES, BERTA ARAMBURU LOPEZ-ARANGUREN

Refinery / Petrochemical. Integration. Gildas Rolland

Conversion Processes 1. THERMAL PROCESSES 2. CATALYTIC PROCESSES

AT734G: A Combined Silicon and Arsenic Guard Catalyst

Challenges and Solutions for Shale Oil Upgrading

LC-FINING Options for Heavy Oil Upgrading

CONVERT RESIDUE TO PETROCHEMICALS

Optimizing Distillate Yields and Product Qualities. Srini Srivatsan, Director - Coking Technology

On-Line Process Analyzers: Potential Uses and Applications

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm Joseph C. Gentry, Director - Global Licensing Engineered to Innovate

Petroleum Refining Fourth Year Dr.Aysar T. Jarullah

Leading the Way with Fixed Bed Resid Hydroprocessing Technologies

WORLDWIDE REFINERY PROCESSING REVIEW. Fourth Quarter 2017

Unity TM Hydroprocessing Catalysts

Challenges and Opportunities in Managing CO 2 in Petroleum Refining

SOLVENT DEASPHALTING OPTIONS How SDA can increase residue upgrading margins

Maximize Yields of High Quality Diesel

GTC TECHNOLOGY WHITE PAPER

Maximize Vacuum Residue Conversion and Processing Flexibility with the UOP Uniflex Process

Annexure-I. Product Pattern after Implementation of Projects

ACO TM, The Advanced Catalytic Olefins Process

Issue No. 109 / 2011 / Catalagram

UOP UNITY Hydrotreating Products

Maximizing Bottom-of-the Barrel Conversion with Commercially Proven Technologies. Jacinthe Frécon

Changing Refinery Configuration for Heavy and Synthetic Crude Processing

Options for Resid Conversion

New hydrocracking catalyst brings higher diesel yield and increases refiner s profitability

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm

Results Certified by Core Labs for Conoco Canada Ltd. Executive summary. Introduction

Mild Hydrocracking using IsoTherming Technology

Low NOx Promoter Optimization at

Report. Refining Report. heat removal, lower crude preheat temperature,

Catalytic Cracking. Chapter 6

Sensitivity analysis and determination of optimum temperature of furnace for commercial visbreaking unit

A message from the editor...

FCC UNIT FEEDSTOCK FLEXIBILITY IN MOL S DANUBE REFINERY

Acombination. winning

Characterization of crude:

Unit 4. Fluidised Catalytic Cracking. Assistant lecturers Belinskaya Nataliya Sergeevna Kirgina Maria Vladimirovna

Hydrocarbon processing Conversion processes. English version based on the presentation of Szalmásné Dr. Pécsvári Gabriella held in 2014

Flexible produc.on of refining products

Impact of Processing Heavy Coker Gas Oils in Hydrocracking Units AM Annual Meeting March 21-23, 2010 Sheraton and Wyndham Phoenix, AZ

A Look at Gasoline Sulfur Reduction Additives in FCC Operations

Process Economics Program

ON-PURPOSE PROPYLENE FROM OLEFINIC STREAMS

Catalytic Reforming for Aromatics Production. Topsoe Catalysis Forum Munkerupgaard, Denmark August 27 28, 2015 Greg Marshall GAM Engineering LLC 1

Investment Planning of an Integrated Petrochemicals Complex & Refinery A Best Practice Approach

FCC pre-treatment catalysts TK-558 BRIM and TK-559 BRIM for ULS gasoline using BRIM technology

Chris Santner; Sr Director, Catalytic Cracking Technology. Coking and CatCracking Conference, New Delhi, October 2013

Refining impact of the IMO bunker fuel sulphur decision

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 211A HYDROCRACKING FOR MIDDLE DISTILLATES (July 2003)

Increase Flexibility to Upgrade Residuum Using Recent Advances in RDS/VRDS-RFCC Process and Catalyst Technology

IHS CHEMICAL High Olefins Fluid Catalytic Cracking Processes. Process Economics Program Report 195B. High Olefins Fluid Catalytic Cracking Processes

THE OIL & GAS SUPPLY CHAIN: FROM THE GROUND TO THE PUMP ON REFINING

Coking and Thermal Process, Delayed Coking

UPGRADER FOR HEAVY, EXTRA-HEAVY CRUDE/BITUMEN AND RESIDUAL FRACTIONS

Cracking the Bottom of the Barrel with MIDAS Technology

Features of HS-FCC. Catalyst System. Optimized Reaction Conditions

Effect of Hydrotreating FCC Feedstock on Product Distribution

Removing High Sulphur Bunker from the Refineries: Eni s case study

Technology for Producing Clean Diesel Utilizing Moderate Pressure Hydrocracking With Hydroisomerization

Recycle and Catalytic Strategies for Maximum FCC LCO Operations

Maximizing Refinery Margins by Petrochemical Integration

UTILIZING CHEAP GAS TO MAXIMIZE REFINERY PROFITS IN NORTH AMERICA. Daniel B Gillis and Ujjal K Mukherjee, Chevron Lummus Global Gary M Sieli, CB&I

The Role of a New FCC Gasoline Three-Cut Splitter in Transformation of Crude Oil Hydrocarbons in CRC

How. clean is your. fuel?

PILOT PLANT DESIGN, INSTALLATION & OPERATION Training Duration 5 days

Impact on Crude Quality

Growing the World s Fuels

Transcription:

Two Companies Joined to Develop a Catalytic Solution for Bottoms Upgrading to Diesel in the FCC Unit William Morales Hipolito Rodriguez Luis Javier Hoyos Tania Chanaga Luis Almanza Ecopetrol-Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo (ICP) Colombia Uriel Navarro Larry Hunt Clemencia Marin Hongbo Ma Rick Wormsbecher Tom Habib Grace Catalysts Technologies Columbia, MD, USA Summary The objectives for this project were developed after an in-depth analysis of the local and world situation of the refining opportunities for diesel production, and of the existing catalyst technologies in the market. The project s team considered the following objectives: 1. Develop an FCC catalyst to increase the LCO (light cycle oil) yield by 3 vol.% 2. Increase the Cetane Index (CI) of the LCO by 4 numbers 3. Maximum gasoline loss of 2 vol.%, while maintaining the Octane number. All of these results were required at constant coke when compared to a base catalyst of adequate zeolite and matrix surface areas. The catalyst results in one of the commercial FCC units of Ecopetrol in the Barrancabermeja refinery were: Increase of 2.3 vol.% in the LCO yield Increase of 3 numbers in the CI Decrease of 1.5 vol.% in gasoline yield, while maintaining octane number. Introduction The largest company in Colombia, Ecopetrol, and the world leader of FCC catalysts, Grace, joined their efforts, talents and resources in a technology innovation project to mitigate the deficit of diesel fuel in Colombia. Local and global market trends showed that the growth in the demand for diesel is greater than for gasoline. Several factors were key in developing the project s objective to maximize LCO production, such as: 1. The conversion capacity of Ecopetro s refineries, based upon FCC technology; 2. An increase in crude oil slates that are steadily richer in heavy oils; 3. The absence of specific catalyst solutions to meet the diesel objectives; 4. LCO is an important component in the streams being sent to diesel hydrotreating units. 30 Issue No. 114 / 2014

This article presents the following stages of this joint development project: 1. The experimental design to obtain the best formulations for the catalysts 2. Laboratory testing 3. Development of the deactivation and simulation procedures for equilibrium catalyst (Ecat) 4. Evaluation in the DCR Circulating Riser pilot plant and the scale-up using a simulation model 5. Commercial evaluation in an FCC unit at Ecopetrol s refinery in Barrancabermeja. In the catalysts design phase, the following factors were considered: the impact of the type and quantity of the zeolite and matrix; the concentration of Rare Earths (RE 2 O 3 ); as well as the catalyst stability and selectivity in a high contaminant metals environment (>10,000 ppm of Ni+V). The best formulations evaluated in the ACE reactors showed increases of 4.0 wt.% in LCO yield and nearly 4 numbers of CI. The evaluation of catalysts in the DCR pilot plant showed an incremental LCO yield of 3.0 wt.% with an improvement in CI of 3 numbers. Recognizing that in resid cracking the coke selectivity of the catalyst is one of the most important properties, great efforts were made for its optimization. The industrial plant scale-up allowed us to corroborate the excellent coke selectivity of the developed catalyst, and the simulations performed confirmed the incremental LCO yields and quality derived from the best formulation. The most important stage of a catalyst development project is its evaluation in the real world of a commercial plant. A commercial trial was started in April 2013 maintaining an average of 25% of resid in the feed throughout the test. The main goal for both companies was to corroborate the lab and pilot plant results in Ecopetrol s commercial unit, as well as to reach the objectives programmed for the project. These were confirmed. Improved coke selectivity was also evident in the commercial FCC unit, which provided a better heat balance and increased operational flexibility. Experimental Design The first step of this project was to identify the catalyst s parameters that affect LCO selectivity (distillation range 221-370 C [430-700 F]) while minimizing any gasoline yield loss. These were: 1. High surface area matrix with good bottoms cracking selectivity 1. 2. Moderate activity to improve LCO conversion while avoiding excessive LCO cracking. 3. Good coke and gas selectivity in resid cracking (fraction 550 C+[1022 F+]). Figure 1 shows a diagram of the experimental design for this project. To select the matrix, 8 different commercial catalysts were evaluated in a fluidized bed micro-reactor (ACE) unit 2. The ACE unit was run at the following conditions: RxT: 505 C [941 F]; C/O ratios of 4, 6 and 8; reaction time 30 sec. The variables that will be optimized are: zeolite content, RE 2 O 3 concentration in the catalyst, and matrix level. Twenty different catalyst formulations were prepared. To deactivate fresh catalysts and simulate the Ecat, two methods were used; Grace CPS-1 3 method and a method developed for this project by ICP (called IDM) 4,5. To develop this IDM method, an Ecat sample that contained the selected matrix was taken from a commercial unit. Then, in the lab, the effect of operating variables such as residence time, deactivation temperature and steam flow were determined, until the optimal conditions were defined that would simulate the physical-chemical properties, the activity and the selectivity of this Ecat. After the catalyst deactivation by the IDM method at 12,000 ppm of Ni+V equivalent, the pilot plant (DCR) studies were run. These studies were performed at the Colombian Petroleum Institute (ICP) [Instituto Colombiano de Petróleo] in isothermal conditions 5, at RxT of 525 C [977 F] and C/O ratio between 4 and 17. For coke optimization it was necessary to optimize the proportion and the type of V and Ni traps. With the results obtained from the DCR unit, a scale-up was performed to a commercial unit, using a commercial model for simulation and optimization. Finally, the commercial trial was performed in an FCC Orthoflow Unit at the 1 1 Matrix Selection 2 Variable Optimizations in ACE Unit 3 Ecat Simulation 4 DCR Study Optimum Formulations 5 Coke Optimization 6 Pilot Plant Scale-up 7 Commercial Trial FIGURE 1: Experimental Methodology Grace Catalysts Technologies Catalagram 31

34 32 LCO, wt.% 30 28 26 24 22 LCO Yields, wt.% 33.5 33 32.5 32 31.5 31 30.5 20 30 18 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 Conversion, wt.% 29.5 Rare Earths Zeolite Content 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FIGURE 2: LCO Selectivity Defines Test Matrix FIGURE 3: Optimization of Catalyst Formulation Ecopetrol refinery in Barrancabermeja. The feed used by the laboratory for the entire project is a blend of 70 vol.% VGO (vacuum gasoil) and 30 vol.% DMO (demetalized oil, obtained in the DEMEX unit of the Barrancabermeja refinery). This blend has the following properties: 18.5 API Gravity, 2.5 wt.% sulphur, 2.3 wt.% CCR (Conradson Carbon Residue) and 10 ppm of Ni+V. Results and Discussion Shown in Figure 2 are the results of the ACE tests (LCO yield as a function of the conversion) to select the catalyst s matrix. These eight (8) catalysts were previously deactivated by the CPS-1 method. This chart shows that catalyst 2 presents higher LCO performance within a reasonable operational range for an FCC unit. In addition, it showed the best bottoms conversion and a good coke selectivity in metals-free testing. Based on these results, this matrix platform was selected as the most appropriate to meet the project objectives, and then the other catalyst variables were optimized. Shown in Figure 3 is the experimental design of this phase of the project, where the aforementioned variables were evaluated in the following ranges: zeolite content (5-30 wt.%), RE 2 O 3 concentration (0-6 wt.%) and the matrix level (20-40 wt.%). In this three-dimensional chart we observe that the maximum LCO performance is in the range of 30-33 wt.% matrix. Based on the different formulations that were studied, the best catalysts were selected for later studies. The two best formulations, among the 20 prepared, were used to study coke selectivity in a high metals environment, where it was necessary to optimize the V and Ni traps. We also needed to investigate the effect of the deactivation mode on the coke selectivity of the FCC catalysts in order to handle resid feedstocks. We did this because it was observed that the deactivation methods used had been developed for catalyst technologies designed for gasoline mode operations. Therefore, ICP developed the IDM deactivation method to simulate the properties of this type of catalyst technology to maximize LCO. Table I shows the activity and coke selectivity results for the two best catalysts comparing the two different deactivation procedures, ICP (IDM method) and Grace (CPS method) at constant conversion (50 wt.%). These results allow us to conclude that the IDM method, at similar metals levels (Ni+V), completely changed the relative activity and coke selectivity of the two deactivated catalysts. The catalyst deactivated by the IDM method required lower C/O ratio to reach the same conversion level with lower coke production. That is, after the hydrothermal deactivation, these catalysts were more active with better coke selectivity, since the IDM method produced a better matrix deactivation (higher Z/M ratio), hence minimizing the catalytic coke produced in the matrix structure. The higher activity (lower C/O) is related to the higher zeolite surface area. The better coke selectivity is related to the lower matrix area and the higher zeolite area, which means higher zeolite/matrix ratio, as is shown in Table I. This important result shows once more that all investigations can benefit from developing its own methods and analytical techniques that allow for correctly evaluating and studying new catalyst technologies. In this case, it can be concluded that the IDM method better simulated the catalyst technologies containing high levels of an active matrix that is designed to increase bottoms conversion to LCO. The results obtained in the DCR pilot plant were used to perform the scale-up to the commercial plant using a proprietary model of ICP, which is tuned with the commercial plant data. This scale-up allows us, through information from the pilot plant, to calculate kinetic parameters that are associated with the catalyst of origin. Once obtained, these parameters are fed to the simulator to proceed under optimization mode to find the optimal operational conditions for the commercial unit. The FCC process model from 32 Issue No. 114 / 2014

Cat 1 Grace CPS NCat 1 ICP IDM Cat 2 Grace CPS Cat 2 ICP IDM Conversion, wt.% 50 50 50 50 C/O Ratio 7.9 4.6 8.75 5.5 Coke, wt.% 9.0 7.4 9.7 8.3 Zeolite/Matrix Ratio 0.24 0.64 0.15 0.59 Ni, ppm 3669 3896 3558 3363 V, ppm 6190 6500 6300 6400 TABLE I: Effect of the Catalyst Deactivation Procedure on the Catalyst Properties Operating Conditions Original Base Case New Base Case ICP-4C Total Feed Rate, BPD 20.200 20.200 20.200 Recycle of HCO, BPD 1.400 1.600 1.900 Reaction Temperature, C 516 516 516 Feed Preheat Temperature, C 216 216 216 Cat/Oil Ratio 6.3 6.2 6.4 Regenerator Temperature, C 729 728 721 Product Yields Conversion, vol.% 72.4 70.9 69.0 Dry Gas (H 2, C 1, C 2, C 2 =, H 2 S), vol.% 4.76 4.82 4.80 LPG (C 3, C 3 =, C 4, C 4 =), vol.% 26.1 21.8 19.4 Gasoline (C 5-221 C), vol.% 52.7 53.7 52.6 LCO, (221-343 C), vol.% 18.4 20.4 22.7 HCO, (343-427 C), vol.% 1.5 1.4 1.5 Bottoms, 427+ C, vol.% 7.7 7.3 6.7 Coke, wt.% 7.0 7.0 7.2 LCO Cetane Index 20.6 23.4 TABLE II: Operating Conditions and Yields for the DCR Pilot Plant Scale-up the scale-up of pilot plant data allows us to perform the heat balance of the commercial unit for each evaluated catalyst. Additionally we are able to perform optimizations toward specific products based upon the needs of the refinery, taking into consideration the operational restrictions of the unit. Table II shows the scaled-up results. There are two base cases shown, reflecting that during the project timeline, the base catalyst was changed as well as the FCC unit where the commercial trial was performed. The original base case was used to define the project s objectives, while the second base case was established from the FCC unit where the newly developed catalyst was tested. In these simulations there is a recycle effect, since it was considered that recycling heavy cycle oil (HCO) was a good practice for maximizing LCO production. The operating conditions allow us to conclude that the developed catalyst (ICP-4C) is more coke selective, since it produces a drop between 7-8 C [12.6-14.4 F] in the regenerator temperature at constant operating conditions. The yields reported with ICP-4C allow us to conclude that there is an increase of 4.3 vol.% in LCO yield compared to the first base case, and of 2.3 vol.% compared to the second base case, with an increase in the cetane index of 2.8 numbers. On the other hand, the decrease in gasoline yield was 1.1 vol.%. These results allowed us to meet the project s objectives and to start preparations for the commercial trial. The commercial trial in one of the FCC units of Barrancabermeja refinery started on April 23, 2013. In Table III, we present the main results from that trial, where the new catalyst (ICP-4C) had an 80% turnover in the Ecat inventory. The feed during the trial was 77 vol.% of VGO and 23 vol.% of DMO, which was 8% more resid (DMO) than the respective base case; so it was a slightly heavier, more refractory feedstock. The obtained yields, compared to the second base case, allowed us to corroborate that the developed catalyst maintained the main operating conditions while processing a slightly heavier feedstock. It was observed that ICP-4C provided Grace Catalysts Technologies Catalagram 33

Base Case Evaluation 80% Turnover Composition (VGO-DMO), vol.% 85-15 77-23 Metals Content (Ni+V), ppm 6.9 8.7 Basic Nitrogen, ppm 569 621 Conradson Carbon Residue, wt.% 1.8 2.0 Sulphur Content, wt.% 1.03 1.09 API Gravity, ÅPI 20.0 18.6 Ecat Ni+V, ppm 9379 9623 Operating Conditions Total Feed Rate 23000 20000 Reaction Temperature 523 521 Feed Preheat Temperature 200 199 Dense Phase Regenerator Temperature 734 734 Dilute Phase Regenerator Temperature 743 741 Cat/Oil Ratio 7.3 7.4 Fresh Catalyst Addition Rate 2.5 2.7 Product Yields Dry Gas (H 2, H 2 S, C 1, C 2, C 2 =), wt.% 4.46 3.63 Total LPG (C 3, C 3 =, C 4, C 4 =), vol.% 21.03 19.38 Naphtha (C 5-221 C), vol.% 48.53 47.06 LCO, (221-343 C), vol.% 21.3 23.6 HCO, (343-399 C), vol.% 7.0 7.5 Slurry (399 C), vol.% 13.9 15.1 Coke, wt.% 6.4 6.7 Conversion, vol.% 57.8 53.8 LCO Cetane Index 23 26 Net Economical Benefits, USD/bbl +0.34 TABLE III: Yields and Operating Conditions of the Commercial Trial a significant decrease in the dry gas production. LCO production was increased by 2.3 vol.% while the cetane index increased by 3 numbers. The decrease in gasoline yield was only 1.5 wt.%. According to the economic evaluation, the ICP-4C catalyst operation achieved an economic benefit for the refinery of 0.34 USD/bbl. The most important conclusion of this project was that the successful strategic alliance of Ecopetrol and Grace to develop a catalyst provided valuable benefits for both companies, while achieving the objectives initially set for the project. 3. D. Wallenstein, R.H. Harding, J.R.D. Nee, and L.T. Boock, Recent advances in the deactivation of FCC catalysts by cyclic propylene steaming (CPS) in the presence and absence of contaminant metals. Appl. Catal. A: General 204 (2000): 89-106. Grace Davison, Guide to Fluid Catalytic Cracking, Part three, Chapter 11. 4. Luis O. Almanza, Simulation of FCC equilibrium catalyst age distribution by using a deactivation model, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. Vol. 166, 2007. Edited by Dr. M. L. Occelli. References 1. Larry Hunt, Maximize bottoms upgrading with MIDAS, Davison Catalagram 98, 2005. 2. J. C. Kayser, US Patent 6 069 012 - Versatile fluidized bed reactor, assigned to Kayser Technology, 2000. 5. Luis O. Almanza, Irreversible deactivation model of the FCC catalyst, XII Colombian Chemical Engineering Congress, Manizales, August 2005. 6. Grace Davison, Guide to Fluid Catalytic Cracking, Part one, Chapter six. 34 Issue No. 114 / 2014